A8 www.quesnelobserver.com
Friday, August 31, 2012 Quesnel Cariboo Observer
FEEDBACK Pipeline proposal ‘reckless’ Editor: The Northern Gateway pipelines and the proposed refinery in Kitimat seem inefficient and reckless. Wouldn’t it be The main pipeline will pump about much safer and 375 thousand cheaper and better barrels of dense mud every for the economy to bitumen day diluted in 145 refine the bitumen thousand barrels natural gas in Alberta then of condensate. pipe high quality The condensate pipeline will oil to the coast – return the 145 eliminating all thousand barrels of condensate every the risk of spilling day. condensate in the So, every day 375 thousand barrels process? of bitumen will be piped and shipped and 290 thousand barrels of condensate (=2 x 145) will be piped and shipped. This extra 290 thousand barrels of condensate each day doubles the risk of a toxic spill and will use huge amounts of energy to pipe and ship. At the end of the line in Kitimat, David Black plans to refine the Bitumen into high quality crude. Wouldn’t it be much safer and cheaper and better for the economy to refine the bitumen in Alberta then pipe high quality oil to the coast – eliminating all the risk of spilling condensate in the process? Also, despite all the Enbridge controversy, foreign owned Kinder Morgan is going almost unquestioned with its plans to expand their similar Tran Mountain Pipeline through Vancouver. If that route is so much safer, maybe Enbridge should pipe their oil to Vancouver too. Along with double-hulled oil tankers, liners should also be required around the pipelines to contain any spill. Oil companies are heavily subsidized paying less than $8 barrel for royalties and selling the oil for well over $90/barrel, so they can obviously more than afford to pay for a safe efficient pipeline. With 804 Enbridge pipeline spills between 1999 and 2010, and Kinder Morgan having a similar record, any obvious safety improvements should be in the plan before the projects are seriously considered. Graham Gerry Quesnel
Fruity attractants Residents are encouraged to pick their fruit trees to avoid attracting wildlife into their neighbourhoods. Autumn MacDonald photo
Letters to the Editor
Letters and emails must include full name and contact phone number and should be 250 words or less. The editor reserves the right to edit submissions for clairity, brevity and legality. Letters to the Editor, Quesnel Cariboo Observer, 188 Carson Ave. Quesnel, BC V2J 2A8 email: newsroom@quesnelobserver.com Ph: 250-992-2121 Fax: 250-992-5229 Quesnel Cariboo Observer is a member of the British Columbia Press Council, a self-regulatory body governing the province’s newspaper industry. The council considers complaints from the public about the conduct of member newspapers. Directors oversee the mediation of complaints, with input from both the newspaper and the complaint holder. If talking with the editor or publisher does not resolve your complaint about coverage or story treatment, you may contact the B.C. Press Council. Your written concern, with documentation, should be sent to B.C. Press Council, 201 Selby St., Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2R2. For information, phone 888-687-2213 or go to www.bcpresscouncil.org