Tokenization: The Future of Entrepreneurial Finance

By Dr Iyandra Smith Bryan

As early as the 2000s, entrepreneurs have sought innovative and dynamic methods of raising capital from the public. We have seen this evident in the surge of crowdfunding platforms attracting professional and retail investors that have been at the center of digital transformation. At the height of the emergence of digital transformation having an incredulous impact on entrepreneurship financing, tokens have emerged allowing entrepreneurs to receive capital easily, quickly, and efficiently. Entrepreneurs are able to raise capital by issuing tokens to token holders in a similar way as a company would issue shares to its investors, in exchange for consideration (the token price). While tokens customarily are not representative of actual ownership in a company, token holders often seek to acquire tokens in anticipation of such tokens increasing in value post their acquisition, and later being sold on a secondary market.

So what is a token? A token is a digital representation of a right(s) to any tangible (financial or otherwise) or intangible assets, stored and recorded on a blockchain. There are different concepts of tokens: tokenized securities, security tokens, utility tokens, or payment tokens. Utility tokens are primarily focused on supporting and developing a communitybased ecosystem by awarding consumptive rights to token holders, while payment tokens are a means of payment in a blockchain based ecosystem. Tokenized securities are customarily considered to be a traditional, regulated security type with a digital wrapper; that is, where the proof of ownership in the company is recorded on a distributed ledger. On the other hand, security tokens tend to have a much expansive scope and inherent characteristics that are formulated to constitute or represent assets typically of an underlying financial type, such as participation in a company’s earnings streams, or an entitlement to dividends or interest payments, or a combination thereof packaged together. Such tokens may be classified as equities, bonds, collective investment schemes, or derivatives, dependent upon their economic functions and terms.

In modern times and in order to take advantage of the heightened process efficiency and greater ability to access global liquidity pools, we have seen new alternative assets formulated as a result of isolating specific economic functions, such as tokenized cash flows from real estate projects or royalty cash flows from works of art. For the purpose of this article, we will focus on security tokens. Security tokens introduce a myriad of benefits to entrepreneurs: first, they create an innovative new financing and capital raising model that leverages scalable efficiencies. They provide enhanced and easily accessible liquidity. Moreover, by removing third party intermediaries traditionally involved in the post-trading process, tokenization offers significant cost-efficiency benefits. A study by Ghent University concluded that tokenization could offer total cost savings of up to EUR 4.6 billion by 2030, provided adoption rates were high. Further, tokens provide customizable opportunities and bridge legacy finance with the new world of digitization, gleaning benefits from each. Customizing and designing security tokens carefully can equip entrepreneurs with heightened abilities to raise more capital easily and quickly. In addition, a data flow free of friction, provided that there is a regulatory framework and adequate policies in place, permits greater transparency.

Tokenization takes place when a new blockchain monopolizing an underlying protocol of various cryptocurrencies is instituted by the company issuing the tokens, and thereafter, the tokens issued by the company are sent directly to the token holder’s digital wallet address or through a crypto-exchange. Blockchain is a “shared distributed ledger that facilitates the process of recording transactions or tracking assets in a business network1.” Thus, blockchainis a distributed database for recording transactions. The word “distributed” means that there is no centralized storage location such as a central server or a cloud computing platform; instead, the information and technical transactions are spread across a wide network of computers. The blockchain concept was first discussed in a Bitcoin white paper, written by Satoshi Nakamoto, in which he referred to the distributed ledger as “a chain of blocks2.” In this white paper, Nakamoto suggested a peer-to-peer distributed ledger platform for the processing of financial transactions without relying on trusted third parties for their execution. The network is founded on a peer-to-peer distributed architecture which necessitates consensus calculations and/or algorithms to ensure that the transactions across the blockchain network are duplicated so that the ledger maintains its integrity. What this means is that anyone with access to the blockchain network will be able to see the same information. Blockchain networks can be public and accessible by anyone, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, or private and permissioned, such as a corporate network for asset tracking. Beneficially, trust is incorporated into the structure of the network.

In some jurisdictions, tokens continue to be unregulated, while in other jurisdictions, regulatory guidance has been issued or a regulatory framework has been put in place to govern token offerings. In the past, some token issuers took the position that so long as the token being offered was not a security under the laws of the jurisdiction if its issuance, there was no need to consider whether the token constituted a security in any of the jurisdictions in which the token may ultimately be purchased or resold. It is clear that this reasoning is faulty. Before issuing tokens, companies should ensure the requisite regulatory and legal analysis is undertaken to determine whether regulation would apply and their tokens could be considered a token, and the steps that must be taken to ensure adequate compliance. If the primary goal is to raise money, rather than for example to build a network, legal and commercial arise are likely to arise that require a consideration before conducting a token sale.

For example, in the United States, the Chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) has provided guidance to the effect that the SEC will apply the tests and standards that have been laid down by the Supreme Court in the well-established case, Securities Exchange Commission v WJ Howey Co. (“Howey”)3 In Howey, the Supreme Court held that the offering by a token constituted a security offering subject to the Securities Act. When determining whether a token offering constitutes a security offering that is subject to the Securities Act, the Supreme Court laid down the following four-prong test: Is there:

(1) an investment of money, (2) in a common enterprise, (3) with the expectation of profit, (4) from the managerial efforts of others? Factors that are relevant to this four-prong inquiry center on the manner in which the token is offered and/or distributed. If a token offering is considered to be a securities offering, then it must adhere to all securities law requirements, which include requirements to register, cybersecurity requirements, AML and market manipulation requirements, amongst other regulatory requirements. Further, firms that are handling the token offering, including any exchange or intermediary trading, are also subject to such securities law requirements. In applying the Howey four-prong test, the SEC has pursued a number of avenues for regulation. In 2017, the SEC applied the Howey test to digital assets for the first time, when it found that the sale of Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) digital tokens was an unregistered securities offering. The DAO was issued via a Swiss foundation, and the SEC’s report on the token offering confirmed that existing US securities law framework applies to token offerings and must be considered even in the case of token offerings occurring primarily outside of the US. The SEC has also issued further regulatory guidance clarifying its view that the vast majority of token offerings are often structured as offerings of securities, for the primary reason that token holders acquired tokens very likely for the exclusive purpose to later profit from an increase in the value of the token, emanating from the company’s business model and strategies.

In The Bahamas, the sale or redemption of a digital token in exchange for fiat currency or another digital assets is expressly regulated by the Digital Assets and Registered Exchanges Act, 2020 (“the DARE Act”). The DARE Act defines what triggers registration of an initial token offering under the legislation. An issuer that intends to offer digital tokens for sale in or from within The Bahamas through a token offering shall prepare an offering memorandum and shall comply with the regulations, rules, and guidelines to be promulgated under the DARE Act. The DARE Act applies to (a) any person who as organizer, issuer, founder, purchaser, or investor participates in the formation, promotion, maintenance, organization, sale, or redemption of an initial token offering; and (b) any legal entity carrying on a digital asset business irrespective of the physical location from which the activity is carried out. Importantly, the DARE

Act expressly excludes tokenized securities, non-fungible tokens, electronic representations of fiat currencies, virtual currencies, and certain other types of tokens are expressly exempted from the DARE Act.

What is important is that entrepreneurs as they seek to raise financing through token offerings remain cognizant of the trend of financial regulators to scrutinize and review token offerings, whether in the jurisdiction of issuance or the jurisdictions in which the tokens are marketed or resold. Tokenization creates new opportunities for raising capital, heightens access to liquidity in a cost-effective manner, and boosts access to new markets in an efficient and more readily accessible way.

1 See Manav Gupta, Blockchain for Dummies I (2017)

2 Satoshi Najamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System 8 (2008) httpsL//perma.cc/43H5-QCSK

3 328 US 293.

Dr Iyandra Bryan, is the General Manager of Quantfury Trading Limited (Nassau, The Bahamas), a fast growing fintech company founded by a group of traders, quants, and machine learning professionals. Quantfury’s mission is to change the exploitative retail trading industry globally, making it cost-effective, fair, and transparent. Quantfury serves 350,000+ users from 56 countries, generating more than $10 billion in monthly trading volume. In her role, amongst other things, she serves as a key strategic partner to the Board of Directors to drive forward business strategy, ensure proper governance, and facilitate the modernization, optimization, and efficiency of the company’s operations. With her depth of experience in financial services, Dr Bryan focuses on ensuring high quality service and support capabilities. Prior to this role, she practiced commercial law at leading law firms in The Bahamas and the Cayman Islands, acted as a Chief Operating Officer of the Cayman Islands Branch of a leading Swiss financial institution, and as Managing Director of the Bahamas Branch of an international fiduciary services company. Dr Bryan holds a BA in Economics from the University of Tampa, a JD from the University of Florida, and a PhD from the University of London, and is admitted to practice law in the State of Florida and the Commonwealth of The Bahamas. She is also an Adjunct Professor at the University of The Bahamas.

Over the past 10 years, the number of licensed captive insurance entities registered in The Bahamas has grown –at first very rapidly and, in the last five years, steadily. As a result, growth has occurred in overall net premium volume along with the expansion in the number of parent company regions throughout the US and Europe.

The growth in The Bahamas’ captive market is largely attributed to small-to-medium sized entities (SMEs) seeking to set up their own segregated accounts. This option has proven to be cost-effective for those SMEs, especially since they can and do outsource administrative and operational oversight to locally-registered insurance managers, financial and corporate service providers and other financial service professionals such as lawyers and accountants.

Presently, all captives are licensed as external insurers

SMEs across varying industries are all interested in the Bahamian captive market. Their aim is to minimise losses that they might incur during the course of their operations.