Page 2
The South African
Art Times
South African Art Times.
Sasol runs for cover from controversial photograph decision of the judges, but stating that they had a right to express a view on any decision.
September 2008 www.arttimes.co.za
“We also recognise that some members of the Sasol staff as well as some members of the public may be challenged or even offended by the piece and we feel it is both responsible and appropriate, that we distance Sasol from the artwork.”
Published monthly by
Global Art Information PO Box 15881 Vlaeberg, 8018, Cape Town Tel. 021 424 7733 Fax. 021 424 7732 Editor: Gabriel Clark-Brown editor@arttimes.co.za Advertising: Leone Rouse leo@arttimes.co.za Subscriptions: Bastienne Klein subs@arttimes.co.za
Richardt Strydom’s Familieportret 2
News: press@arttimes.co.za Shows: show@arttimes.co.za Artwork: art@arttimes.co.za
By Patrick Burnett
Layout: Newyearsday Media Deadlines for news, articles and classifieds 20th of each month The Art Times is published in the first week of each month. News and advertising material need to be with the news and marketing managers by the 15th- 20th of each month. Newspaper rights: The newspaper reserves the right to reject any material that could be found offensive by its readers. Opinions and views expressed in the SA Art Times do not necessarily represent the official viewpoint of the editor, staff or publisher, while inclusion of advertising features does not imply the newspaper’s endorsement of any business, product or service. Copyright of the enclosed material in this publication is reserved.
INTERNATIONAL SUBSCRIPTION Use our secure payment portal on www.arttimes.co.za Pay in UK Pounds, US Dollars and Euro’s NAMIBIA Call John at: Tel: +264 81 1286585
Front cover: Ann Schweizer: Rothmania capensis. See it at The Kirstenbosch Biennale 08
September 2008
A photograph featuring a semi-naked couple has sparked a debate over how corporates should handle controversial art after Sasol distanced themselves from the work when it won the prestigious New Signatures award. The photograph, Familieportret 2 by Potchefstroom photographic artist Richardt Strydom, features a penis, a hint of panties and a bit of bosom. Declared the winner of the Sasol New Signatures competition at an event at the Pretoria Art Museum two weeks ago, it netted Strydom R60,000. But Sasol were not impressed with the rationale that the photograph depicted the “suffering middle classes” and announced they were distancing themselves from the work. The petrochemical giant did, however, confirm their support for the judging panel. Artist and curator Clive van den Berg, quoted in Business Day, was scathing. “This is an extraordinary decision. If Sasol wants to sponsor an art competition they
must accept that a function of art is to challenge and comment on society. If they want to support something tame, they should stick to rugby.” Further questions have been raised elsewhere, with Sasol being seen as promoting itself as a patron of the arts, but only of work that it likes. And how could Sasol, as one blog posting asked, adopt a conservative approach when it’s own brand was concerned with innovation? Strydom’s image is described by the judges of the competition as “a picture of loss and the loss of human dignity depicting the extreme misery, pathos and dehumanisation of poverty.” Francì Cronjé, Sasol New Signatures Competition Chairperson, explained: “The work depicts a controversial level of nudity. However, the judging panel felt the entry could be any South African family, or part of the global community of suffering middle-class.” However, Sasol issued a statement on its website, accepting the
Contacted for comment, Strydom, a graphic design lecturer at North West University, defended his work. “I don’t think Sasol distancing themselves from my work diminishes the work and I put my faith in the panel.” However, he said the controversy opened an “interesting debate” about the future of corporate-sponsored art competitions. While corporate money was needed to develop the arts, corporates were also concerned about their brand image, which could be at odds with artists. Commenting on the issue, Mike van Graan, a playwright and director of the Africa Centre, which organises the Spier Contemporary, points out that there is a tension between the interests of any funder and those of artists when it comes to freedom of expression. This would inevitably lead to conflicts with society, politicians, funders and the public. “It’s the recognition of these inherent tensions that will help to manage these better,” he said. In this sense, Van Graan said the funder was providing a space and in so doing gained mileage, rather than being associated with every form of freedom of expression in
that space. But Van Graan said that by bringing attention to one work, there was a move to censorship. The better way of handling the issue would be to inform stakeholders beforehand about providing a space for artistic expression rather than distancing or justifying works in retrospect.
lection, remembers a piece by artist Abrie Fourie on the Voortrekker monument that led to criticism both from those who thought it was glorifying apartheid and those who believed it was mocking Afrikaans culture. MTN hosted a debate on the company intranet inviting people to air their thoughts and then published the results in a company publication.
Van Graan notes that corporates never distance themselves from sport. “And goodness knows there are sufficient examples of embarrassing things in sport,” he said.
“It’s best to be able to predict controversy, but sometimes you can’t do that and then the best way is to acknowledge it and deal with it head on.”
In response to questions about only wanting to be associated with art it likes, Sasol Group Communications Manager Jacqui O’Sullivan said: “Art is in the eye of the beholder and while it is true that we believe in infinite boundaries, we also have to responsibly consider the sensitivities of our various shareholders.”
But Hobbs believes that people are far more tolerant than they were 10 years ago, when there were heightened political, religious and racial sensitivities.
O’Sullivan said the issue was not about Sasol “disliking or labeling the winning piece” but being sensitive to different audiences, “particularly our diverse internal audience”. She said Sasol would not censure or control the New Signatures judging process and were proud of their 19-year association with the competition. “We respect freedom of expression and, with that, Sasol’s freedom to express an opinion. We also respect the many differing public views on what is perceived to be acceptable.” Other corporates have faced similar challenges and dealt with them differently, however. Philippa Hobbs, curator of the MTN art col-
“When there is sensitivity then one has to be very prepared with a professional strategy that is acceptable to the corporate world and the art sector.”
Why pay vast amounts of money for quality contemporary Art News ? Go to www.arttimes.co.za to find this month’s complete SA Art Times for free