0 O u 20ED WITHursued R IP MITT ll be p
ers n t r
ri TION PE ment P In C ge
t gh i r y op C ©
08ANY FOtual pro 0 2 R c
O lle rin DU ING d inte RO ts inf i T R P w E N E h I n R g N P ment • There must be an emphasis on the moral and humanitarian , PR ight a to be periodically OF rty ri • Reasons for Refusal should Gcontinue e N M r e I g R y Y n P cop FO l prop imperative of offering sanctuary through and reviewed and the UKBA COshould NY tinformation a All ensure that its presentation O u A N R llec O education in order to secure long of refusals are carefully handled and not misrepresented G term te public support. TIN nd in N I automatically as bogus claims. ta , PR • The concept of sanctuary NG yrighmust be distinguished very I Y p P N clearly from Oeconomic CO All co migration, through avoiding the • Access to legal representation from the earliest stage in the SIO S N I term ‘asylum’ and choosing appropriately understood process is imperative and research should be undertaken ERM as S P law. S E R N K terminology. to the inability of applicants to secure legalXPrepresentation E der U SIO S T I U at the earlier stages. Whilst researchHisO undertaken, current un ERM .the public on • The availability and quality of information IT sued S P for w W S r a E l R restrictions on legal aid funding be relaxed and ED should pu XP er UK those seeking sanctuary must be IT T ill be T Eimproved. M d R U where there is lack ofPlegal representation then interviews E O d un tw ITH to N ON emen ue promote tolerance and I • Efforts must be made W s T r should be postponed to allow proper representation. RA C ing ED e pu O U T r D T f G I te l b those seeking sanctuary and to neighbourliness towards TIN nd in PRO hts in ERM nt wil N E I P R • Engagement F rigwith applicants should ensure that applicants ta eat a local level. , PR ON assist integration NG yrigh M O perty I CTI ingem R Y U p are fully and properly aware of issues that surround O o D fr OP ll co Y F al pr A O C and PRO hts in of the key recommendations of the Commission AEsummary AN ctucredibility N R of claim with opportunity to clarify submit R g O elle F t y ri O G t r N n M I i e T R further evidence and where the system itself has failed the IN nd FO l prop , PR ight a a G u claimant then this must be recognised and addressed. ct yr YIN OP ll cop C A NO • Appeal rights and conduct of appeals
8 00
t2 h g ri
Pa
y op C ©
ers n t ar 8P
nt i r In P
0
0 R2
00
ers n t r
R2 P I nt. i r In P
ers n t ar 8P
t rin P In
ar P 8
t. IP n i Pr n I rs e n t
t gh i r py o ©C
00
2 ht g i r py o ©C
t rin P n rs I e tn
08 20
art P 8 00 2 R
P
ne
R • Fast Track XP ION process and its impact on quality of decision TE n ISS U M HO d u PERmaking should be examined and results used to inform WIT ursue SS law. E D R future policy TE e p UK XP T E nder MIT will b R U E on How to Improve How we decide Who Needs Sanctuary P HO d u nt ION • Expert Evidence ION eme ISS is as follows:WIT ursue T M D C g TE e p DU infrinProcess should PER • Public Understanding of Decision MIT will b RO Making SS law. s R P E E K P ent R right • Establishing a ‘protection culture’ U F N r O y O e be addressed rt M CTI ingem OR prope r F DU support f O n Y • Better access, screening and for applicants C R N al si NO R A llectu REP right O F y G te M O rtshould • That decisionRmakers be graduates of suitably high TIN nd in N O prope I F ta l , PR NY adequate grade, support for case work with respect to tua NG yrigh I R Awith c Y e O p l P G nmanagement, tel CO All co time, training and evaluation of decisions IN NT and i NO I R t G, P ghmade. YIN opyri N c All SIO • Interviews should be audio recorded, with sensitive handling S I ERM of claims based on sexual violence with appropriate S P law. S E R UK XP interviewees, clear guidelines on conduct of interviews T E nder U O u P ION with the UKBA Gender Asylum and training in accordance ITH sued ON I ISS W The final two reports will be formally published and T r M D C g TE be pu Instruction. S PER . DU infrin ITlaunched Oto l M w l R S in June and July 2008 and will pave the way i s a R P E t l R UK PE nt w RE righ XP OF by • Interpreters IONandeme reform of the system. The first report was welcomed T E nder should be appropriately recruited rty the T M U C g U frin OR prope HO e d u F D T I u and ensure all interviews are compliant l of the RO with W trained NYthatamany s in the UKBA and indications have been received urs R A llectu REP right TED be pinterpreters’ O F T I code of conduct. recommendations will be supported nte the Commission M O r ty ING and RM t will NT and i OR prope I n F R e , P ight will also be received as m NY tual be comprehensive, hopes that its final twoNGreports • Country of Origin Information I R A lleshould c Y O pyr P positively and constructively G inopportunities te CO All co as the first. updated and accurate for applicants’ INwith T O d N N PRI ht anThe Advisory Panel on Country As the Chairs of the Commission have said; “Fixing the system ,variance. to explain any G g i N r PYI copywidened to allow for Operational Information CO All be is not the whole answer. The public have to understand ION O N ISS M Guidance Notes to be scrutinised. and support sanctuary – and the system that PERprovides it for SS law. E R thoseKin politics and • Fast Track process should ensure that where there is evidence those fleeing persecution. We callT on EXP der U U n O u N and all people of H society, d IO trauma then government, the media andITcivil of torture, sexual violence or other formsSSof I W ursue M D good will in every class, race, region and nation of the UK, to R E p that person’s vulnerability shouldSbe urgently PE established IT T ill be . M w S a R K l Fast Track process. join together and t w in a campaign to win hearts and PEpersevere PRE Uthe and the individual removed Xfrom ON emen I T E nder T U and C long O d uHammondsworth and Yarl’s minds –DU OR ing term support – for sanctuary”. A review is undertaken e ITH ofsuthe O s infr YF R W N r P t E ireport ED e pudecisions. R A ctu Wood fast track gh is available on:www.independentasylumcommission.org.uk F R full IT T initial OThe yr G O intelle lb t M l r i N M I R tw PE OR ope INT nd Y F al pr ON emen , PR ight a I N T G u A R llectLawyer July 2008 UC ing yr YIN The OD s infr G O Muslim OP ll cop te R C N n I P i t T E A O h
s
t rin P In
py
t2 h g ri
R2
8 00
rs ne
ar P 8
00
8 00
ers n t r
R2 P I . t rin P In
ers n t r
©
Pa
ers n t ar 8P
ers n t ar 8P
t rin P In
2
ers n t ar P 8
t. IP n i r In P
00
2 ht g i r py o C
ers n t ar P 8
t rin P In
00
ar P 8
00
t2 h g i
nt i r In P
00
©
a 8P
00
R2 P I nt. i r In P
ers n t r
t2 h g yri p Co
IPR . t rin P n I
00
t2 h g yri p o ©C
o ©C
0
Pa
t rin P In
Par 8 0
n rs I e tn
. IP t n Pri
nt. i r nP I s r tne
2 IPR
art P 8 00 2 t gh i r y op C ©