A. Curran Portfolio

Page 1

ALYSSA CURRAN

Master in Urban Planning Harvard University Graduate School of Design alyssa.a.curran@gmail.com | 716.867.7593


2 / 20

Harvard University Graduate School of Design

2016 - 2018

MASTER IN URBAN PLANNING, CONCENTRATION IN URBAN DESIGN / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Harvard Re(Design) Innovation Challenge, 1st Place Team 2015 Career Discovery Program, Urban Design

University of California, Los Angeles Department of Geography PHI BETA KAPPA | COLLEGE HONORS PROGRAM, Magna Cum Laude BACHELOR OF ARTS IN GEOGRAPHY / ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

2009 - 2013 3.82 / 4.00 GPA

Center for American Politics and Public Policy Quarter in Washington Programs Abroad: Switzerland [Urban Planning], China [Geography], Spain [Language] DigUCLA: Founder and Director Ecochella Bike-Powered Concert: Bike Teams Coordinator


3 / 20

Experience 4 months 3 months

[2017] [2017]

6 months 2 years

[2016] [2013-2015]

U.S. Green Building Council, Massachusetts Chapter New York City Department of City Planning, Manhattan Borough Office Placetailor: Design, Build and Development Architecture Firm Natural Resource Strategies Environmental Consulting Services Community Conservation Solutions

Certifications [2017]

Envision Sustainability Professional Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure

[2017]

LEED Green Associate U.S. Green Building Council

[2017]

Living Building Challenge Ambassador International Living Future Institute

[2018 to present] [2016 to present] [2015 to present]

Unidos por Utuado, Board of Directors American Planning Association, Member The Global Grid, Urban Planning Blogger

Affiliations 3 months 2 years 3 years



[ALYSSA CURRAN] This collection of work reflects my personal mission to bring sustainable design principles and adaptation strategy into each project I work on. Driven by climate science, social disparities across geographies, and a love for both urban and natural environments, I am passionate about planning and building cities to manage operations, distribute resources, and embrace technology in a more effective and equitable way. I aspire to integrate this type of efficiency into creating and sustaining places that also offer chances for happiness and enjoyment.


CONTENTS

6 / 38

03 Planning for Sustainability

08

The Utuado Hydro Cooperative Roxbury District-Scale Development: Perspective Site Plan Partnering for a More Self-Sufficient South End Re(Design) Innovation Challenge: Countway CoLab Site Plan Pierview: Adapting The San Francisco Seawall Site Plans

02 Imagining the Possibilities

14

Roxbury “Knowledge Hub” Community Center Rendering Re(Design) Innovation Challenge: Countway CoLab Renderings

01 Diagramming Urban Systems Adapt East Boston | Climate Risk: Energy Infrastructure Adapt East Boston | Resilience Retrofits Transform: Building Scale

20


7 / 38

04 Analyzing the Built Environment

27

Pierview: San Francisco Seawall Geospatial Analysis - Hydrology, Sea Level Rise, Power Potential Grabbin’ It by the Rhetoric: Spatial References from the 2016 Campaign Trail NYC: What Do We Know About These Privately Owned Public Spaces? Mapping Vulnerability: Project Prioritization Tool Various Analyses: Harvard Campus, MBTA Ridership Critical Infrastructure Flood Risk Analysis: 2013 - 2070

05 Modeling Urban Dynamics

35

More Public Space: Pedestrian Through-Block Plaza Gender Rhythms: Rhythmanalysis Pierview: Adapting The San Francisco Seawall Clay Model

06 Blogging For The Record Musings on urban planning issues. Publisher: The Global Grid: Urbanist news. Local views.

38


8 / 40 01: Project Plans

THE UTUADO HYDRO COOPERATIVE CLIMATE SOLUTIONS LIVING LAB Instructor: Wendy Jacobs


01 PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY

The Utuado Hydro Cooperative project proposes reinvestment in legacy hydropower infrastructure to generate and distribute 100% clean energy in a remote

region of the island where some households have remained without power since September 2017 when back-to-back hurricanes struck the island.


Water project Energy project

Wate r Flow

Food project Vacant property Open space

1. Prioritize water collection, filtration, storage, and reuse project sites based on proximity to natural water flow 4. Identify clusters of vacant parcels for indoor/outdoor urban agriculture

M

LK

6. Form energy microgrids; pilot district resource pooling

Jr. B

lvd .

2. Create a community hub: experiments/research/training + kitchen/cafe + music studio

4

N

. n St

re War

3. Transform streets into “water arteries” (“green streets”)

5. Build projects that compliment existing uses (ex. industry + phytoremediation)


11 / 40 01: Project Plans

ROXBURY DISTRICT-SCALE DEVELOPMENT Neighborhood food, water, and energy production/collection projects in the Roxbury Crossing neighborhood of Boston. A hydrology study and vacant property survey formed the basis of this project’s design strategy. By harnessing the strength of Roxbury’s Urban Farming Institute and identifying key sites for community-driven projects, this proposition employs a “district-scale” approach to community development. URBAN PLANNING CORE STUDIO I Instructors: Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Sai Balakrishnan, Toni Griffin


12 / 40 01: Project Plans

2.

1/2-MILE DIAM ETER

4.

1.

6.

5. 3.


13 / 40 01: Project Plans

PARTNERING FOR A MORE SELF-SUFFICIENT SOUTH END Stakeholder analysis and site plan for microgrid + local water resources district in the South End neighborhood of Boston. 4. Residents

DISTRICT PARTNERS

2. Academic Institution

1. Anchor Institution: Boston Medical Center 2. Academic Institution: Boston University School of Medicine 3. Public Space: Recreational Fields; Streetscape, Parking Lots 4. Residents: Worcester Square Pilot Project 5. Industry: Renewable Energy Technologies 6. New Development: Education, Training, & Community Center URBAN DESIGN FOR PLANNERS Instructor: David Gamble

6. New Development

1. Anchor Institution

3. Public Space

5. Industry


14 / 40 01: Project Plans

RE(DESIGN) INNOVATION CHALLENGE Vision: The Countway CoLab. The CoLab embodies three overarching design principles: (1) sustainability, (2) usability, and (3) community. Âť Green Dream Team, 1st Place Winners Daniel Sherman, Harvard College Alyssa Curran, Harvard Graduate School of Design Shoshanna Levine, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Bhargav Srinivasan, Harvard Business School, Harvard Law School Meghan Venable-Thomas, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Role: strategy, research, site plan and design, construction documents.


THE COUNTWAY COLAB

Site Plan | Design Elements

Sustainability

COUNTWAY LIBRARY

Innovative Growing Weathering Drainage

Usability Sound Space Energy Community Collaboration Accessibility Creative Placemaking By: The Green Dream Team

N


16 / 40 01: Project Plans

PIERVIEW: ADAPTING THE SAN FRANCISCO SEAWALL Embracing inflows of rising seawater at waterfront ecopark, harnessing tidal and wave power with renewable energy technology, and upgrading combined sewer system using green infrastructure. Multi-purpose infrastructure; climate adapted; designed for virtual power plant integration; open space components. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OPTION STUDIO Instructors: James Lord, Roderick Wyllie

1. SEAFLOOR TIDAL ENERGY 2. POWER BUOY WAVE ENERGY 3. FERRY PIER RETROFIT: WAVE ENERGY COLUMNS

4. NEW EMBANKMENT: LEVEE + WATER CHANNEL 5. ENERGY STORAGE 6. DEEP POOL TIDAL BASIN

7. HIGH MARSH TIDAL ZONE (ABOVE MEAN HIGHWATER) 8. LOW MARSH TIDAL ZONE + SUBSURFACE WATER STORAGE 9. GRASSED / VEGETATED SWALE AND UPLAND AREA

10. STORMWATER COLLECTION AND DIRECTION RUNNEL 11. VEGETATED BUFFER ZONE

7 11

2

10

5

6

3

9

4

SALT WATER

CHANNEL

BRACKISH WATER

HIGH MARSH

LOW MARSH

GRASSED SWALE / UPLAND

BUFFER

URBAN

8

RUNNEL

1


04 ANALYZING THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT 0

375

Feet 1,500

750

Deep Water Outfall

Harness energy at the waterfront

Storm drain

Manage inflow of sea level rise and flooding

Improve stormwater quality and management

Natural Water Flow

Wet Weather

North Point

Facility

nel

Water Tun

CONCEPT: SAN FRANCISCO WATERFRONT PARK 0

375

750

STORMWATER FLOW & INFRASTRUCTURE

Feet 1,500

0

375

750

1000-15

Feet 1,500

00 W 2 /m

600-10

00 W 2 /m

FEMA Special

Flood Hazard

400 -6

Area - HIGH RISK

00 W 2 /m

200-40

0 W/m 2

0-200

0 ft

W/m 2

tourism + retail

SLR office + mixed

6 ft

SLR industrial + government ernment nment residential

SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION UP TO 6 FT (YEAR 2100)

TIDAL ENERGY PRODUCTION POTENTIAL


18 / 40 04: Analysis

https://vimeo.com/216477348

GRABBIN’ IT BY THE RHETORIC Spatial References from the 2016 Campaign Trail

Do references to places (“name-dropping”) by a candidate correspond to voter preference? By: Alyssa Curran, Charles Newman, Hazal Seval and Sam Matthew Role: speech content analysis, data management, map animation (points). MAPPING: GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND SPECULATION | Instructor: Robert Pietrusko


19 / 40 04: Analysis

NYC: WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THESE PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC SPACES? Independent research project conducted during internship with NYC Department of City Planning. Proposition: GIS data can be used to configure Privately Owned Public Space (POPS) amenities to the needs or desires of the proximate public. Consider a POPS with a high concentration of residents within a 5-minute walk. Vegetated noise buffers, pedestrian through-block corridors and dog waste recepticles might be a good match. POPS: 5 min walksheds of 15 POPS in Manhattan Within walksheds: » 93,000 residents » 398,000 employees » 491,000 people total POPS properties: » 188,000 SF public space » 1,202,000 SF bonus area built » 9,400,000 total SF built Did You Know? For every 1.0 SF of privatepublic space provided, 6.4 SF of bonus private space was built across these 15 POPS.


20 / 40 04: Analysis

MAPPING VULNERABILITY: PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOL

SOCIAL JUSTICE MEDIAN INCOME

EDUCATION ATTAINMENT

LANGUAGE

PEOPLE OF COLOR

RENT BURDENED

PROXIMITIES & DENSITIES PROXIMITY TO FLOOD RISK

PROXIMITY TO SCHOOLS

POPULATION DENSITY

overview | objectives| identification tool| property analysis | conclusion

CRITICAL ASSETS DENSITY

VEGETATION DENSITY


zation Index: Results

PROBABILITY

Prioritization Tool (ModelBuilder, weighted overlay) created to identify where various conditions overlap; data layers included are based on the Social Determinants of Vulnerability Framework developed by Dr. Atyia Martin, City of Boston Chief Resilience Officer.

URBAN PLANNING COREIndex: STUDIO II Prioritization Instructors: Stephen Grey, Kathy Spiegelman,Results Daniel D’Oca Model

| identification tool| property analysis | conclusion


22 / 40 Making Use 04: Analysis

PROXIMITY ANALYSIS: of Harvard's Green Spaces: Prioritizing Sites forSPACE Stormwater+ & Flood Management Projects GREEN HYDROLOGY

Alyssa Curran | Vis 2129 | Assignment 04

Key Priority Sites for Stomwater/Flood Projects (based on water flow accumulation)

Harvard Green Space: Proximity to Water Flow Accumulation Closest Closer Close Lowell Park

Drainage Pattern: Flow Accumulation Low Low-Med Med Med-High High Harvard Buildings Water Bodies Beren Tennis Center

Elevation - Feet Under 5

Charles River

5 - 15 15 - 25

Soldiers Field Athletic Area

25 - 35 O'Donnell Field

35 - 45 45 - 55 55 - 65

McCurdy Track

65 - 70

¯

70+ Roads

0

500

1,000

2,000 Feet


PREDICTING MBTA RIDERSHIP CAMBRIDGE: PREDICTING MBTA RIDERSHIP IN IN CAMBRIDGE:

DAILY RIDERSHIP + PEOPLE WITHIN A 1,000M WALKSHED RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS: DAILY RIDERSHIP + PEOPLE WITHIN A 1,000M WALKSHED PREDICTING MBTA RIDERSHIP IN CAMBRIDGE:

23 / 40 04: Analysis

RESIDENTS + JOBS + MBTA RIDERS DAILY RIDERSHIP + PEOPLE WITHIN A 1,000M WALKSHED

Daily Rid Daily Ridership

25000 25000

Daily Ridership vs. People in 1,000m Walkshed 25000

HARVARD

20000

ALEWIFE ALEWIFE

DAVIS DAVIS

15000

DAVIS ALEWIFE

10000

PORTER

PORTER 5000

PORTER PORTER

MBTA Daily Ridership

DAVIS

MBTA Daily Ridership

ALEWIFE

MBTA Daily Ridership

20000

20000

CENTRAL

15000

KENDALL/MIT

15000

DAVIS ALEWIFE

10000 ALEWIFE

10000

PORTE PORTER

0

5000 0

10,000

20,000

5000 30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Total Number of People (jobs+residents) in 1,000m Walkshed

HARVARD

0

Legend MBTA Red Line Cambridge Daily Ridership

Un der 1 0,000 10,001 - 1 2,000

Why do Porter and Kendall/MIT fall below the trendline? 0 10,000 0 Porter: centrally located at the point of Mass. Ave. and Somerville Ave.; 20,000 0 10,000 close to residences, grocery stores, restaurants, and other shops; ample Total N bike parking, hubway station, four bus line connections. Total Number of Kendall/MIT: centrally located near institutions, businesses, and restaurants on Main St.; two hubway stations in close proximity, four bus Why do Porter and K line connections. Both stations are wheelchair accessible. Why do Portercentrally and Kendal Porter: locat

CENTRAL

HARVARD KENDALL/MIT HARVARD

12,001 - 1 5,000 15,001 - 1 6,000

16,001 - 2 0,000

Legend 20 ,0 00 MBTA Red LineOver Cambridge

Legend

Daily Ridership

People MBTA Red Line Cambridge

Un Jobs der 1+0,000 Residents

Daily Ridership

11,000 10,001 -Un 1 der 2,000

Un der 1 0,000

11,00 0 - 20,00 0

- 3 0,000 1 5,000 10,001 - 1 2,000 12,001 -20,001 30,001 - 3 6,000

12,001 - 1 5,000

36,001 - 4 0,000

15,001 - 1 6,000

Over 40 ,0 00

15,001 - 1 6,000 16,001 - 2 0,000

0

16,001 - 2 0,000

500

1,000

Meters Over 20 ,0 00

CENTRAL CENTRAL

Porter: centrally located at t

residences, g It is interesting to note the comparison - and lack ofclose patternto - for median close tobike residences, grocery income of these areas. Porter Square median income is $75,658, veryhubway parking, close to that of Cambridge as a whole ($75,909), while Kendall/MIT bike parking, hubway station Kendall/MIT: centrall KENDALL/MIT area is $104,014.1 Perhaps ridership is lower than we might predict centrally locate KENDALL/MIT restaurants S from the trendline because there are moreKendall/MIT: people who both live andon Main restaurants ontransit. MainIt’sSt.; two work in these areas and therefore do not need to take linepublic connections. possible residents and workers of these areas are walking, biking, or line connections. Both stations are whe using rideshare/carshare services more than other areas. It may also be Bothconditions stationsareare wheelchair possible that there is ample parking, and traffic such that driving to/from these areas is more convenient thanItpublic transit. is interesting to note

¯

People

People

Jobs + Residents

Jobs + Residents Un der 11,000 11,00 0 - 20,00 0 20,001 - 3 0,000 30,001 - 3 6,000 36,001 - 4 0,000

Un der 11,000

Alyssa Curran | Vis 2129 | Assignment 05

11,00 0 - 20,00 0 20,001 - 3 0,000 30,001 - 3 6,000 36,001 - 4 0,000 Over 40 ,0 00

Over 40 ,0 00

0

500

It is interesting tothese note the co income of areas incomeclose of these areas. Porte to that of Camb 1 close toarea thatisof$104,014. Cambridge Pea 1 Perhaps area isfrom $104,014. the trendline becr from the trendline because work in these areas at work inpossible these areas and ther residents an possible residents and worke using rideshare/carsh using rideshare/carshare possible that there ser is

1. 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Yr Estimates.

Over 20 ,0 00

1,000

¯


24 / 40 04: Analysis

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FLOOD RISK ANALYSIS: 2013 - 2070 Energy & Communications System Vulnerabilities URBAN PLANNING CORE STUDIO II ADAPT EAST BOSTON Instructors: Stephen Grey, Kathy Spiegelman, Daniel D’Oca

FLOOD IMPACT

2013

2030

2070

19% underground storage tanks

33% underground storage tanks

86% underground storage tanks

50% critical energy sites

63% critical energy sites

88% critical energy sites

46% communications towers

62% communications towers

62% communications towers

Flood Probability: area flooded by 2 or more inches of water at a particular location. Range: 0.1 % - probability of 1000 year flood level (red) | 100 % - probability of highest annual tide (blue) Data source: Boston Harbor Flood Risk Model, MassDOT


REVERE

25 / 40 01: Diagramming

��������� � L�������� N������ ��� ������� � S������

CHELSEA ��������� � H������ O�� S������ ��������� S������

���������� S������ �N������ ��� � �����

EVERETT

T����������� C�������

EAST BOSTON

S�������� C������� ��������� S������

BOSTON

S��������� S�������� T����������

����������� S������ T��� ���������� �� O���� H�������� S���������� N

������� C�������


01 DIAGRAMMING URBAN SYSTEMS

26 / 38

ADAPT EAST BOSTON CLIMATE RISK: INFRASTRUCTURE Energy and communications infrastructure in East Boston are vulnerable to disruption, including the effects of climate change. As a low-laying peninsula in the Boston Harbor, the neighborhood is susceptible to coastal storms, high tide flooding and sea level rise. The region also experiences seasonal storms, including heavy snow and rainfall events. These conditions require advanced planning to protect public safety, infrastructure, and the economy. A vulnerabilities assessment was performed to examine threats to energy and communications infrastructure in the coming 50 years. URBAN PLANNING CORE STUDIO II Adapt East Boston | Instructors: Stephen Grey, Kathy Spiegelman, Daniel D’Oca


27 / 40 01: Diagramming

27 / 38

ADAPT EAST BOSTON | RESILIENCE RETROFITS

CURRENT SYSTEM

PROPOSED SYSTEM 1/27/18, 10:01 PM

  PRODUCTION 

nonrenewable energy production

  

DISTRIBUTION





  

CONSUMPTION



LOCAL PRODUCTION + CONSUMPTION FEEDBACK LOOP

 https://cdn5.aoe.com/fileadmin/AOE.com/images/icons/coding/aoe_icons_Continuous_Deployment.svg

linear production - consumption process

Page 1 of 1

  

 - 

results in wasted resources & pollution     &  ()

 

nonrenewable    energy storage

  +  water treatment  

resources delivered across vast networks  +      losses across transmission lines = $ billions         

distribution network susceptible hazards      to ( & )

 

 


DISTRICT COMPOSITION

28 / 38

single family

two family

three family

4+ apartments

9%

11%

41%

4%

commercial

school + municipal

residential

energy

5 % buildings 37 % land

65 % buildings 48 % land

2 % buildings 4 % land Data source: City of Boston, 2015

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC: ROOFTOP AND VERTICAL PANELS SOLAR WATER HEATER SMALL ENERGY STORAGE MICROWIND LARGE ENERGY STORAGE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION

UPGRADES

GEOTHERMAL KINETIC ENERGY COMBINED HEAT & POWER FUEL CELLS

water

WASTE TO ENERGY

GREYWATER SYSTEM RAINWATER HARVESTING BASEMENT CONVERSION: RAIN/STORMWATER STORAGE (DETENTION BASIN) LIVING ARCHITECTURE: GREEN ROOFS AND GREEN WALLS PARKING LOT CONVERSION: RAIN/STORMWATER STORAGE (DETENTION BASIN)

communications

SPORTS FIELD CONVERSION: WATER STORAGE

STORM-HARDENED LOCAL WIFI NETWORKS LOW-POWER FM RADIO


SOLAR POWER SOLAR POWER

RAINWATER COLLECTION

WIND POWER

29 / 40 01: Diagramming

29 / 38 GREYWATER REUSE KINETIC ENERGY: BIKE GENERATOR

UPGRADED COURT

PERMEABLE PAVEMENT KINETIC ENERGY TILES

BIOSWALE / RAIN GARDEN RAIN/STORMWATER FILTRATION

BIOSWALE / RAIN GARDEN

STORMWATER FILTRATION & STORAGE

School

Public Space

WIND POWER

SOLAR POWER SOLAR POWER WIND POWER COMMUNITY SPACE

MANUFACTURING SPACE

HEALTH CENTER BIKE POWER

ENERGY STORAGE

TRAINING / WORKSHOP

WATER PLAZA ZERO EMISSION COMMUTER CORRIDOR +BIOSWALES/ RAIN GARDEN

PERMEABLE PAVEMENT STORMWATER FILTRATION & STORAGE

GEOTHERMAL POWER

STORMWATER FILTRATION & STORAGE

New Development

Industry


SOLAR POWER RAINWATER COLLECTION

30 / 40 01: Diagramming

30 / 38 GREYWATER REUSE

GREEN ROOF

RAINWATER IRRIGATION +STORAGE

ENERGY STORAGE

Residential

TRANSFORM: BUILDING SCALE

STORMWATER FILTRATION & STORAGE WIND POWER

RAINWATER COLLECTION

These diagrams explore distributed energy and local water system design elements based on building type. The building types shown represent the six most prevalent types within the area of interest.

SOLAR POWER ENERGY STORAGE

BIOSWALE V2G ELECTRIC VEHICLE FLEET + CHARGING STATIONS STORMWATER FILTRATION & STORAGE

Institution / Commercial

BASIC ELEMENTS »on-site power generation »on-site water collection & filtration »on-site water reuse »energy, water storage »vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology »connection to district system / marketplace »sustainable building materials and design


31 / 40 02: Imagining

31 / 38

ROXBURY DISTRICT-SCALE DEVELOPMENT

«Knowledge Hub» Community Center in Roxbury Distributed Resources District. URBAN PLANNING CORE STUDIO I Instructors: Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Sai Balakrishnan, Toni Griffin


32 / 38

02 IMAGINING NEW POSSIBILITES


33 / 40 02: Imagining

33 / 38

RE(DESIGN) INNOVATION CHALLENGE Vision: The Countway CoLab. The CoLab embodies three overarching design principles: (1) sustainability, (2) usability, and (3) community.


34 / 38

34 / 40 02: Imagining


35 / 40 02: Imagining

35 / 38

RE(DESIGN) INNOVATION CHALLENGE Vision: The Countway CoLab. The CoLab embodies three overarching design principles: (1) sustainability, (2) usability, and (3) community.


36 / 38

36 / 40 02: Imagining


37 / 38


38 / 38

05 MODELING URBAN DYNAMICS

MORE PUBLIC SPACE: PEDESTRIAN THROUGH-BLOCK PLAZ Building form and program design for parking lot infill project. SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT | Instructor: Andres Sevtsuk


ZA

39 / 40 05: Models

39 / 38

GENDER RHYTHMS: RHYTHMANALYSIS


PIERVIEW: ADAPTING THE SAN FRANCISCO SEAWALL

40 / 38

(Left) What patterns do gendered pathways reveal? This rhythmanalysis presents a representation of the spaces and trajectories men and women occupy for fulfilling daily activities. The city has been remapped according to four major activity layers in the dataset: Bodily, Mental, Social, and Economic for men and women (2014 to 2017 student data). For this investigation, gender has been simplified to a female/male binary and assigned based on the judgment of the investigators.

40 / 40 05: Models

Sea Level Rise

By: Alyssa Curran, Lena Ferguson, Natasha Hicks Role: data review and analysis, fabrication (laser cutting, woodshop). MAPPING: GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND SPECULATION | Instructor: Robert Pietrusko Stormwater

(Right) Clay modeling was used to imagine how ecological design can be used to direct stormwater and seawater through a water treatment, storage, and recreation park along the waterfront. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OPTION STUDIO Instructors: James Lord, Roderick Wyllie

Energy elements


41 / 40 06: Blog

41 / 38

615 AND COUNTING: LEED PROJECTS HELP LA REACH GLOBAL CLIMATE GOALS | 5500+ views

L.A. PLANS FOR RESILIENCY IN THE WAKE OF INTENSIFYING CLIMATE EVENTS | 4500+ views

ANGELENOS OPT FOR TRAFFIC, NOT TRANSIT: RIDERSHIP DOWN 10% 6800+ views

L.A. JOINS GROWING NUMBER OF U.S. BIKE-SHARE CITIES 5100+ views

SAVE THE DROP! L.A. ACHIEVES 16% BOSTON IS GETTING WATER WISE REDUCTION IN WATER CONSUMPTION, WITH GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUT MISSES THE MARK | 2800+ views DESIGN | 7100+ views


42 / 38

06 BLOGGING FOR THE RECORD

CLIMATE ACTION ON THE CITY LEVEL: HOW DO BOSTON AND L.A. COMPARE? 2900+ views

FOOD WASTE, HUNGER, ENERGY AND GROWTH IN NEW YORK CITY 4200+ views

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT IN NYC: THE ROLE OF PRIVATELY-OWNED PUBLIC SPACE | 2200+ views

GREENBUILD 2017: TURNING A “SLEEPY COUNTRY INTO AN INNOVATION NATION” | 1100+ views

HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN BOSTON: THE ANTIDOTE TO “HERITAGE DÉCOR?” | 660+ views

GROWING A SUSTAINABLE, “GREEN” ECONOMY IN BOSTON Posted January 30, 2018

42 / 40 06: Blog


THANK YOU

»issuu.com/alyssacurran »www.linkedin.com/in/alyssacurran »alyssacurran.myportfolio.com

43 / 38


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.