University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Architecture ARCH 573 Integrative Design Studio, Fall 2013 Michael Kyong-il Kim, Ph.D., AIA, NCARB Professor of Architecture With Teaching Office HDR, Inc. and Gensler
Final Design Review
The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
355 East Erie, Chicago, Illinois December 6, 2013
Student Team: Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
Table of Contents
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
1
Acknowledgement
Page 3
2
Introduction
Page 4
3
Project Goals and Design Objectives
Page 5
4
Context Analysis and Design Implications
Page 8
5
Site and Meronic Design Implications
Page 14
6
Major Functional Units and Relationships
Page 16
7
Space Organizational Concept
Page 17
8
Site Plan
Page 22
9
Elevator Riser Diagram
Page 26
10
Floor Plans
Page 27
11
Building Sections and Elevations
Page 36
12
Building Images
Page 40
13
Enclosure System
Page 52
14
Structural System
Page 56
15
Mechanical System
Page 62
16
Area Tabulation
Page 69
Appendix A
Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting
Page 71
Appendix B
References
Page 76
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
2
Acknowledgement We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Michael Kim for his continuous support and guidance throughout the semester. Without his patience, passion, and immense knowledge it would not have been possible to complete the project. We are also very thankful to the distinguished firms of HDR, Inc. and Gensler for serving as our teaching offices. We appreciate the time and effort they have committed to advancing architectural education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This project has taught us many valuable lessons about the comprehensive design and the integrated practice of architecture. We thoroughly enjoy the learning experience, and feel more prepared for future challenges in the profession.
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
3
2 Introduction The purpose of ARCH 573 Comprehensive Integrative Design studio is to focus on creating maximum value under the realistic temporal, technical, legal, and budgetary limitations. Using the new Ability Institute of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC), designed by HDR and Gensler, as a teaching project, our team learn about the integration of building system, functionality, and aesthetics. The state-of-the-art RIC facility will represent a new form of healthcare delivery, which embraces the philosophy of creating ability. It will be a place where people, not patients, regain ability. It will also be a place of collaboration for multiple disciplines, and support the concept of translational medicine where clinical care, physicians, researchers, and students coming together. Our team began the design process with defining the project goals and design objectives, which became the guiding principles throughout the development of the project. Contextual analysis of the site such as the socioeconomic condition of the neighborhood were explored to help us recognize the meronic value of the design. Since mid-review, our team focused on further enhancing the meronic quality of the design, to better engage the pedestrian and the community, and ensuring continuity of experience from ground level to the upper floors. Landscape and interior design were also examined to enhance the brand of the RIC.
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
4
3 Project Goals and Design Objectives Institutional Mission/Vision
To Improve Human Life through research, patient care, and education RIC Mission and Vision The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) is dedicated to providing the highest-quality patient care through integrated research, scientific discovery, and education for the purpose of maximizing the recovery of the individuals in our care. To Advance Human Ability. RIC will serve as the world’s leading scientific hospital for the innovation and application of new and more promising treatments that improve and eliminate the effects of injury, disease and debilitating health conditions.
1
(Adapted from the RIC’s institutional mission and vision statements)
Project Goal: Functional Utility
To Enhance The Rehabilitation and Healing Process To Facilitate Advancement of Research, Education, And Clinical Care Sub Goal: Functional Efficiency • • • • • •
To provide personalized care by bringing rehabilitation and clinical care to patients To promote collaboration among departments To design flexible and adaptable rooms To meet the patient needs who might have physical and cognitive challenges To create a total space for research and rehabilitation activities To encourage the team work and community support
Sub Goal: Environmental Comfort • • • •
To provide green spaces to assist with physical and psychological recovery To facilitate a low-stress environment through aesthetics To maximize daylighting To provide controllable lighting and shading devices
Sub Goal: Safety and Protection • • • •
To respect patient privacy through spatial organization To reduce hospital acquired infections To prevent patient falls To designate controlled entry points
Sub Goal: Usability • • •
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
To ensure easy wayfinding so it is intuitive for patients, family, and staff To provide clarity in circulation and destination points To create ease of movement throughout the facility
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
5
3 Project Goals and Design Objectives
2
Project Goal: Aesthetic Value
To Enhance The RIC’s Image As A World-Class Rehabilitation And Research Center To Portray the Image of Wellness Objectives • •
3
To portray the idea of innovation and technological advancement through materials, form, and massing To inject liveliness into the space such as using colors, furnishings, and finishes
Project Goal: Meronic Value
To Create A Place That Enriches The Human Spirit Objectives • • • • •
4
To activate the community through urban parks and public plazas To serve as an outreach educational center To give back to the community through green and open spaces To be a respite for the medical professionals To motivate patients and families through spaces that promote interaction
Project Goal: Constructibility
To Construct a Quality and Efficient Building Sub Goal: Economy • •
To specify local and readily available materials To design with efficient modular construction where applicable
Sub Goal: Safety • •
To use materials that are not harmful to human and the environment To ensure patient safety through building design and material selection
Sub Goal: Speed • • ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
To construct in phases for possible early occupancy To select an efficient structural and mechanical system
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
6
3 Project Goals and Design Objectives
5
Project Goal: Investment Value
To Form Strong Partnerships For Profitability To Increase The Rate of Return on Investment Objectives • • •
6
To create retail and commercial opportunities and promote healthy living, such as grocery store, cafe, and pharmacy To build a strong network with local business such as bookstore, library, museum, and local universities and enhance the research and education functions To lower long term maintenance and operational expenses
Project Goal: Social Responsiveness
To Manage Resources Responsibly Objectives • • • •
7
To provide accessible care to anyone in need, regardless of their physical or psychological abilities, race, age, gender, or socio-economic status To be self-sustain and self-sufficient in building energy use To give back to the community through returning excess energy To contribute to the global research efforts on rehabilitation
Project Goal: Preservation of Design Value
To Create Maintainability And Adaptability Objectives • • •
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
To design adaptable and flexible spaces for future changes in use To employ durable and easily replaceable materials To accommodate future expansion and program
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
7
4 Context Analysis and Design Implications
Michigan Ave. (From North)
th)
Design Implications • Ensure easy arrival experience • Entrance along McClurg should be more prominent • Convenient location for main entrance and drop-off • Consider service entrance from Erie and exit from Ontario
om Nor LSD (Fr
4.1 Site Access Diagram • Patients and visitors will be approaching from multiple directions • Highest traffic count along Lake Shore Drive • Most traffic converge at the corner of Erie and McClurg • Service vehicles will approach from the west I-90/I-94
From I-90/I-94
Project Site
Ontario Ohio
Vehicular Traffic From Lake Shore Drive South From North Michigan Avenue From South Michigan Avenue
Michigan Ave. (From South)
Truck Traffic From I-90/I-94
Traffic Count 150,000 cars/day 50,000 cars/day 10,000 cars/day
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
LSD (From South)
From Lake Shore Drive North
N
* Trucks can only access site from I-90/I-94 or from Michigan Avenue
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
8
4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.2 Streeterville Neighborhood Overview • Economic boom of the 1920s - high-end shopping district, high-rise apartment buildings and luxury hotels
Dr ore ive
Design Implications • Site is located near the heart of the neighborhood and the medical campus; consider connection with the residential, medical, and the university communities
e Sh Lak
Today - hotels, restaurants, professional office centers, residential high rises, universities, medical facilities, and cultural venues Michigan Avenue
•
Streeterville Neighborhood Approxmiate Boundary
Project Site
Land Use Hotel
Illinois Street
Retail Commercial Office Mixed-Use Culture & Entertainment University Residential
N
Healthcare
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
200
500
1000
9
4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.3 Socio-Cultural Context Population • Majority of the residents in Streeterville are young professionals, small households with young children •
Median income level Streeterville is relatively high compared with Chicago
•
Most residents live in multi-family (50+ units) high-rise apartment or condominium towers
Design Implications • Focus on needs of the community of young families; expectations of high quality and world-class facilities
Population Density (2010)
Average Household Size (2010)
Streeterville
Streeterville
27,265 people per mile2
1.5 people
Chicago
Chicago
11,877 people per mile2
2.6 people
Median Household Income (2010)
Families with Children (2010)
Streeterville
Streeterville
$78,043
40%
Chicago
Chicago
$46,195
21.5%
Streeterville Median Age (2010)
Families with Both Parents Working (2010)
Streeterville 97.1%
Chicago 61.1% Owners vs. Renters by Unit Type (2010)
http://www.city-data.com/neighborhood/Streeterville-Chicago-IL.html
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
10
4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.3 Socio-Cultural Context • Streetville has a variety of restaurants and cafes, but only has a few services for daily necessities, e.g. grocery stores
2000 feet (about 10-minute walk)
Design Implications • Can inform the meronic value for the design
1000 feet (about 5-minute walk) 500 feet (about 2-minute walk)
ive
Michigan Avenue
Dr ore
e Sh Lak Project Site
Services Restaurants & Cafes Banks & ATMs Grocery Stores Florists & Gift Shops Salons & Spas Daycare Centers
Illinois Street
Dry Cleaners
Arts & Recreation Museums Theaters Parks
N
Playground
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
200
500
1000
11
4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.4 Climatic Context Temperature • Wide Temperature Range (18-85) • Create outdoor space the is usable year-round • Control internal temperature efficiently Precipitation • Access to site during inclement weather • Efficient ways to collect and reuse rain water
90
Annual December November October September August July June May April March February January
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
0
HIGH (F)
LOW (F)
MEAN (F)
5
10
15
SNOW (IN.)
Chicago Annual Temperature
20
25
30
35
40
PRECIPITATION (IN.)
Chicago Annual Precipitation
January - March
April-June
July-September
October-November
Chicago Wind Speed and Direction ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
12
4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.5 Physical Context Soil • Streeterville’s soil is composed of silt and sand •
Hazardous soil has been found in a dozen Streeterville locations due to the use of radio-active chemical in the mid 1930s
•
The EPA and the City of Chicago require soil investigation if any hard surfaces such as concrete or asphalt are removed in the area
Adjacent Structures • Building materials - concrete and steel structures with glass, brick, stone, and metal exterior finishes
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
13
5 Site and Meronic Design Implications 5.1 Meronic Design Implications: Three roles of the RIC
as an innovative research center a place to collaborate and learn
•
as the community partner - a place to engage local residents through services
Residential Community
Medical Community
University Community
ive
Michigan Avenue
•
Dr ore
as the world-class rehabilitation center - a place to heal and regain ability
e Sh Lak
•
Project Site
Residential Community
Illinois Street
N 0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
200
500
1000
14
5 Site and Meronic Design Implications 5.1 Meronic Design Implications: Three roles of the RIC
To uplift spirits
To Heal Inpatient Care
To Improve Human Lives
RIC as the world-class rehabilitation center To heal and regain ability
To Care
RIC as the innovative research center
Clinical Care & Research
To care and collaborate
To Activate
RIC as the community partner
Public Amenities
To activate and engage To enrich everyday lives
Translation To Building Mass
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
Functional Relationship
15
Inst. adv./women board, non-clinical support serv., care mgr & social workers, global patient serv., phys. practice, clinical admin., consulting phys., education/conf., IT, exec. suite
Administrative Offices
Double beds, Queen beds, King beds, Suites, Storage
Hotel Rooms
Non-Hospital MOB
Research
Pediatric services, day rehab, neuro physician, musculoskeletal physician & therapy, pain mgmt. centers, prosthetics/ orthotics & assistive tech program, wheelchair room
Outpatient Services
Brain, spinal cord, neuromusculoskeletal, obstacle course, pediatrics, non-inpatient
Ability Lab
Lobbies, life center, coffee kiosk, chapel/ spiritual care, security, volunteers
Inpatient - Public
Dietary, materials management, environmental services, medical record, pharmacy, facilities/biomed, admitting, facility shops
Inpatient - Support
Respiratory herapy, dialysis, radiology services, therapeutic recreation, pool, ADL apartment/ car transfer
Inpatient - Clinical
Low Adjacency/ No Direct Access
244 RICU beds
Moderate Adjacency/ Convenient Access
Inpatient - Stepdown Unit
Immediate Adjacency/ Direct Access
Inpatient - Care Unit
Legend
36 Pediatric, 108 brain (1-3), 72 spinal cord (1-2), 72 neuromusculoskeletal (1-2) beds
6 MAjor Functional Units and Relationships
Inpatient - Care Unit 36 Pediatric, 108 brain (1-3), 72 spinal cord (1-2), 72 neuromusculoskeletal (1-2) beds
Inpatient - Stepdown Unit 244 RICU beds
Inpatient - Clinical Respiratory herapy, dialysis, radiology services, therapeutic recreation, pool, ADL apartment/ car transfer
Inpatient - Support Dietary, materials management, environmental services, medical record, pharmacy, facilities/biomed, admitting, facility shops
Inpatient - Public Lobbies, life center, coffee kiosk, chapel/spiritual care, security, volunteers
Ability Lab Brain, spinal cord, neuromusculoskeletal, obstacle course, pediatrics, non-inpatient
Outpatient Services
Pediatric services, day rehab, neuro physician, musculoskeletal physician & therapy, pain mgmt. centers, prosthetics/orthotics & assistive tech program, wheelchair room
Research Non-Hospital MOB Hotel Rooms Double beds, Queen beds, King beds, Suites, Storage
Administrative Offices Inst. adv./women board, non-clinical support serv., care mgr & social workers, global patient serv., phys. practice, clinical admin., consulting phys., education/conf., IT, exec. suite
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
16
7 Space Organizational Concept
44 43
7.1 Vertical Stacking Diagram
42
Mechanical
Shelled Space
41 40 39
Estimated 4 Levels
Shelled Space
38
36 35
Future Expansion for Research
Inpatient - Spinal Cord 36,978 NSF
34 33 32 31 30 29
Inpatient - NMSK 36,978 NSF
Inpatient - Brain 55,467 NSF
28 27 26 25
Inpatient & Ability Lab
24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17
MOB & Outpatient
Public
15
13M 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 B
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
17,079 NSF
A.L. - Spinal Cord 11,059 NSF
A.L. - Flex A.L. - NMSK 10,071 NSF
A.L. - Brain 2 5,657 NSF
A.L. - Brain 1 10,213 NSF
A.L. - Non Inpatient 3,331 NSF
A.L. - Peds 6,694 NSF
Research Off. & Support 29,450 NSF Patient Services 19,880 NSF Outpatient Services
A.L. - Obstacle 7,964 NSF
72,410 NSF
Medical Office Building 150,000 NSF
16
14
Sky Lobby
Stepdown 6,262 NSF Inpatient Clinical 18,883 NSF Inpatient - Pediatrics
21,296 NSF
37
Neurosci. & Eng. Research
Future Expansion
Future Expansion for Ability Lab
Hotel Rooms/ Future Expansion
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
Administrative Offices 62,240 NSF Education/Conf. Sky Lobby & Dietary Advancement Office Mechanical Staff Parking Public Parking
Public Lobby, Entrance, Retail
Mechanical
Electrical Vault 17
7 Space Organizational Concept 7.2 Building Form and Program
Mechanical Hotel & Future Expansion
To Heal
Hotel Amenities & Future Expansion
Inpatient Care
Inpatient Units Ability Lab Research
To Care
Outpatient Services
Clinical Care & Research
MOB Administration Sky Lobby
To Activate Public Amenities
Parking Public Lobby
Building Form in Mid-Review
Revised Building Form
Revised Program Stacking
Tighten mass and accentuate beacon
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
18
7 Space Organizational Concept 7.3 Functional Space Organization - Ground Floor Lobby
Non-Public
Function: • Serve as the street level pedestrian access and main reception • Serve as the drop-off point for patients arriving by private car, ambulance, medi-van or other transport • Provide a space for patients waiting for transportation • Serve as the entry point for employees arriving by private car, public transit or bicycle
Public
Erie
Parking Ramp
Staff Lobby
Cafe
Building Core Service Access
Lobby
Loading
Parking Ramp
Vehicular Traffic
Patient Drop-off
Outdoor Space
Retail
Patient and Visitor Vehicles Service Vehicles
Pedestrian Traffic
Ontario
Patient and Visitor Staff 00 Ground Floor Lobby ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
19
7 Space Organizational Concept Best View to Lake Michigan
7.3 Functional Space Organization - Sky Lobby Function: • The formal reception of patients and visitors coming to the inpatient floors, MOB, Ability Labs, research, outpatient clinics, obstacle course, etc. • Include an information/greeter desk and security • Provide access to Life Center, Volunteers, and access to outdoor spaces
Cafe Dietary
Building Core
Lobby
Garden
Administrative Offices Volunteer
Chapel
Life Center
Circulation Patient and Visitor Staff 13 Sky Lobby
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
20
7 Space Organizational Concept Best View to Lake Michigan
7.3 Functional Space Organization - Typical Inpatient Floor
Family
Patient Room
Family
Ability Lab
Arrival Patient Room
Function • Provide care for adult and pediatric patients requiring admission for rehabilitation of acute and/or chronic illness, and participate in therapy • A therapy- driven team approach to care/treatment • Patients will spend most of their day involved in therapy either in their room, in the Ability Lab or in the community
Nurse Station & Staff
Building Core Research
Arrival Activity Family
Patient Room
Family
Patient Room
Family
Circulation Patient and Visitor 23 - 36 Inpatient
Staff
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
21
8 Site
Lake Michigan
8.1 Site & Meronic Design Quality Legend
E. Huron Street
Anchor Points/ Destination Public Plaza Ground Lobby Building Support E. Erie Street
rive
Service
eD hor
Patients & Visitors
S ake
Overhang above
N. L
Vehicular Circulation
E. Ontario Street
Immediate Context Healthcare Office/ Retail Residential Hotel
N. McClurg Court
N. Fairbanks Court
E. Ohio Street
E. Grand Avenue
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
100
200
400
N 22
8 Site 8.2 Site & Meronic Design Quality Continuity from Ground Level to Sky Lobby
Sky Lobby
Ground Level
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
23
8 Site 8.3 Site & Meronic Design Quality - Ground Level
Small Group Lounge Seating e. O
hio
Small Group Cafe Seating Str
eet
Communal Seating Water Feature
Coffee Shop
Lobby Retail Store
e. O
nta
rio
Tone-on-tone Concrete Pavers Str
eet
Large Group Lounge Seating Small Group Seating Water Feature Communal Gathering Space ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
N 24
8 Site 8.4 Site & Meronic Design Quality - Sky Lobby
Sculpture
Small Group Lounge Seating Small Group Cafe Seating Communal Seating Water Feature
Dietary
Administrative Offices
Volunteer Lobby
Chapel LIFE Center
Sculpture
Large Group Lounge Seating
Water Feature Communal Seating
N ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
9 Elevator riser diagram Mechanical
Hotel
Service
Staff Inpatient & Ability Lab
MOB
Patient
Public Parking
Hotel
Express
Ability Lab/Clinical
RIC Expansion Floors
Outpatient
MOB
Sky Lobby & Offices
Parking
Public ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
26
10 Floor Plans B
10.1 Ground Floor (Level 1) E. Erie Street
Key 1
Public Plaza
2
Drop-off
3
Entry Vestibule
4
Retail Space
5
Lobby and Reception
6
Coffee Shop
7
Security
8
Parking Elevator Lobby
9
Staff Lobby
10
Staff Elevator Lobby
11
Loading and Sorting
1
Ramp Down to Exit
9
6
7
2
A
11
Legend
10
8
A’
5
Public & Visitor Entrance N. McClurg Court
3
Staff Entrance Parking Entrance Service Entrance One-Way Traffic
Ramp Up to Parking Floors
4
Two-Way Traffic
1
Elevators Express Public Parking Staff
B’
Service E. Ontario Street
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 27
10 Floor Plans 10.2 Public Parking Floor (Level 3) Key 1
Mechanical
2
Elevator Shaft (Express)
3
Electrical & Communication Closets
4
Storage
5
Elevator Shaft (Staff )
5
2
3
4
3
DOWN TO EXIT
4 1
Legend Down Traffic Up Traffic UP
Elevators Public Parking Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 28
10 Floor Plans 10.2 Public Parking Floor (Level 4-8) Key 1
Mechanical
2
Elevator Shaft (Express)
3
Electrical & Communication Closets
4
Storage
5
Elevator Shaft (Staff )
5 3
4
2
3 4
Legend Down Traffic Up Traffic
Elevators Public Parking Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 29
10 Floor Plans B
10.3 Sky Lobby (Level 13) Key 1
Gardens
2
Coffee Kiosk
3
Lobby and Reception
4
MOB Elevator Lobby
5
Inpatient Elevator Lobby
6
Hotel Elevator Lobby
7
Staff Elevator Lobby
8
Cafeteria
9
Outdoor Dining
10
Kitchen
11
Institutional Advancement and
Balcony Above
UP
9
Line of Ceiling Above
1
2
8
Mezzanine Above
A
A’
Women’s Board Offices 12
Outdoor Space for Staff
13
Volunteer Office
14
Chapel
15
Outdoor Meditative Space
16
LIFE Center
6
4
3
5
11
Elevators Express MOB
7
10
12
13
14
16
1
15
Balcony Above
Hotel Outpatient & Inpatient Staff
B’
Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 30
10 Floor Plans 10.4 Sky Lobby Mezzanine (Level 13M) Key 1
Lobby/ Pre-Function Space
2
Global Patient Services
3
Staff Elevator Lobby
4
Conference Center Offices
5
Outdoor Pre-Function Space
6
Conference Center
7
Staff Development & Training Center
8
Outdoor Break Space
9
Staff Development Offices
10
Security Office
Line of Garden Below
5 Open to Lobby Below
4
1
3
6
7 Elevators Express
Line of Ceiling Above
2
9
10
8
Staff Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 31
10 Floor Plans 10.5 Inpatient Floor - Pediatrics (Level 23-24) Key 1
Inpatient Elevator Lobby
2
Reception
3
Family Communal Space
4
Ability Lab
5
Outdoor Space
6
Neuroscience & Engineering Research
7
Classroom
8
Patient Room
9
Play Room
10
Inpatient Support
11
Staff Elevator Lobby
12
Ability Lab Support
Mezzanine Above
5
4
7 2 8
10
11
12 1 6
5
2
9
8
3
8
7
Elevators Future Inpatient Ability Lab/Clinical Outpatient & Inpatient Staff Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 32
10 Floor Plans B
10.6 Inpatient Floor - Typical (Level 25-36) Key 1
Inpatient Elevator Lobby
2
Reception
3
Family Communal Space
4
Ability Lab
5
Ability Lab - Research
6
Neuroscience & Engineering Research
7
Respite
8
Patient Room
9
Activity/Multipurpose Room
10
Inpatient Support
11
Staff Elevator Lobby
12
Ability Lab Support
Mezzanine Above
7
8
UP
4
3
2
A 8
10
11
UP
12
A’
5
1 6 2 9 Elevators
8
3
8
7
7
Future Inpatient Ability Lab/Clinical Outpatient & Inpatient Staff
B’
Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 33
10 Floor Plans 10.7 Hotel (Future Expansion) - Typical (Level 37-40) Key 1
Hotel Elevator Lobby
2
Lobby
3
Communal Lounge
4
Shelled Space
5
Business Lounge
6
Standard Room
7
Suite-Style Room
8
Concierge Lounge
9
Hotel Storage and Housekeeping
Mezzanine Above
5 7
DN
4
3
4
2
6 1 9
4 2
8 Elevators
7
3
6
5
5
Hotel Future Clinical Future Inpatient Future Staff Service
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 34
10 Floor Plans 10.9 Inpatient Floor - Typical Patient Room
Patient View Range
Bedside Charting
View to Exterior Primary View
View to Staff
Dry Work Zone Wet Work Zone Charting Station
Hygiene Zone Family Zone
Patient Zone
Clinical Zone
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
2
4
8
16
N 35
11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.1 East-West Section (A-A’)
44 Top of Penthouse
620’-0”
43 Rooftop/Penthouse
590’-0”
41 Mechanical
560’-0”
37 Hotel
500’-0”
34 Spinal Cord
455’-0”
31 NMSK
410’-0”
26 Brain
335’-0”
23 Pediatrics 22 Research
290’-0”
19 Outpatient
230’-0”
15 MOB 14 Administration
155’-0”
13 Sky Lobby
125’-0”
03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby
275’-0”
170’-0”
25’-0” 0’-0”
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
50
100
200
36
11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.1 North-South Section (B-B’)
44 Top of Penthouse
620’-0”
43 Rooftop/Penthouse
590’-0”
41 Mechanical
560’-0”
37 Hotel
500’-0”
34 Spinal Cord
455’-0”
31 NMSK
410’-0”
26 Brain
335’-0”
23 Pediatrics 22 Research
290’-0”
19 Outpatient
230’-0”
15 MOB 14 Administration
155’-0”
13 Sky Lobby
125’-0”
03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby
275’-0”
170’-0”
25’-0” 0’-0”
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
50
100
200
37
11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.2 Building Elevations
44 Top of Penthouse
620’-0”
43 Rooftop/Penthouse
590’-0”
41 Mechanical
560’-0”
37 Hotel
500’-0”
34 Spinal Cord
455’-0”
31 NMSK
410’-0”
26 Brain
335’-0”
23 Pediatrics 22 Research
290’-0”
19 Outpatient
230’-0”
15 MOB 14 Administration
155’-0”
13 Sky Lobby
125’-0”
03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby
275’-0”
170’-0”
25’-0” 0’-0”
East Elevation
North Elevation 0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
50
100
200
38
11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.2 Building Elevations
44 Top of Penthouse
620’-0”
43 Rooftop/Penthouse
590’-0”
41 Mechanical
560’-0”
37 Hotel
500’-0”
34 Spinal Cord
455’-0”
31 NMSK
410’-0”
26 Brain
335’-0”
23 Pediatrics 22 Research
290’-0”
19 Outpatient
230’-0”
15 MOB 14 Administration
155’-0”
13 Sky Lobby
125’-0”
03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby
275’-0”
170’-0”
25’-0” 0’-0”
South Elevation
West Elevation 0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
50
100
200
39
12 Building Images 12.1 Exterior - From Huron and McClurg (northeast)
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
40
12 Building Images 12.1 Exterior - From Erie and Fairbanks (northwest)
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
41
12 Building Images 12.1 Exterior - From Ontario (southeast)
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
42
12 Building Images 12.2 Exterior - Arrival Plaza
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
43
12 Building Images 12.2 Exterior - Plaza
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
44
12 Building Images 12.3 Interior - Ground Lobby
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
45
12 Building Images 12.4 Interior - Sky Lobby
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
46
12 Building Images 12.4 Interior - Sky Lobby
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
47
12 Building Images 12.5 Interior - Ability Lab
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
48
12 Building Images 12.5 Interior - Ability Lab
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
49
12 Building Images 12.6 Interior - Typical Inpatient Corridor
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
50
12 Building Images 12.7 Interior - Typical Patient Room
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
51
13 Enclosure System Aluminum panel
13.1 Enclosure Details
Fritted glass up to sill @ 3’-0” AFF Vision glass, 6’-0”H Fritted glass, 3’-0”H @ 9’-0” AFF
1
2
Aluminum panel Fritted glass Vision glass
Cable Wall
Inpatient (Brain 3)
Ability Lab (Brain 2)
Inpatient (Brain 2)
Ability Lab (Mezzanine)
Inpatient (Brain 1)
Ability Lab (Brain 1)
1) Inpatient Floors & Ability Lab Aluminum panel
3
Fritted glass up to sill @ 3’-0” AFF Vision glass, 6’-0”H
Cable Wall MOB
MOB MOB
2) MOB & Outpatient Floors Aluminum panel - embossed finish Open Parking 5 Parking 4 Parking 3 Parking 2
3) Typical Parking Floors ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
52
13 Enclosure System
13.2 Typical Curtain Wall Section Vision Panel
Structural Silicone Joint
Fritted Insulated Glass
Curtain Wall Slab Anchor
Aluminium Panel
Extruded Horizontal Mullion
Fritted Glass Spandrel Panel
Structural Silicone Joint Black Out Screen Light Fixture Vision Panel
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
53
13 Enclosure System 13.3 Typical Curtain Wall Axonometric
Aluminium Panel
Fritted Glass Spandrel Panel
Vision Panel
Fritted Insulated Glass
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
54
13 Enclosure System 13.4 Cable Wall Detail
Button Anchor
Structural Silicone Joint
Terrazzo Tile Flooring Concrete Slab Metal Decking
Cable Guide Low Iron Glass 1� Steel Cable
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
55
14 Structural System 14.1 Structural Axon
Steel Framing: Sky Lobby (Level 11) to High Roof (Level 43)
Flat Plate Concrete Strcuture: Basement (-1 Level) to Parking (Level 10)
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
56
14 Structural System 14.2 Ground Floor Structure
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
300'-0" 15'-0"
30'-0"
45'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
45'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
15'-0"
15'-0"
A
30'-0"
B
30'-0"
C
30'-0"
E
210'-0"
30'-0"
D
30'-0"
F
30'-0"
G
J
15'-0"
H
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N
57
14 Structural System 14.3 Parking Floor Structure
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
300'-0" 15'-0"
30'-0"
45'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
45'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
15'-0"
15'-0"
A
30'-0"
B
30'-0"
C
30'-0"
E
210'-0"
30'-0"
D
30'-0"
F
30'-0"
G
J
15'-0"
H
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N
58
14 Structural System 14.4 Sky Lobby Mezzanine Framing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
300'-0" 15'-0"
30'-0"
45'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
45'-0"
30'-0"
30'-0"
15'-0"
15'-0"
A
30'-0"
B
30'-0"
C
30'-0"
E
210'-0"
30'-0"
D
30'-0"
F
30'-0"
G
J
15'-0"
H
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N
59
14 Structural System 14.5 Typical Steel Framing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H J
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N
60
14 Structural System 14.6 Patient Floor Framing w/ Ability Lab Mezzanine
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H J
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N
61
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.1 Mechanical Air Riser Diagram
44 43 42
Zone 5
FRESH AIR
Hotel
41 40 39 38
NATURAL VENTILATION
37 36 35 34
EXHAUST AIR FROM RETURN EXHAUST AIR
33 32
Zone 4
Inpatient & Ability Lab
31 30 29 28 27
SUPPLY
26 25
RETURN
24 23
EXHAUST
22
Zone 4
Outpatient
21 20 19 18
Zone 3
MOB
17 16 15 14
Zone 2
Sky Lobby
13M 13 12
Parking
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
Zone 1
Ground Lobby
1 B
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
62
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.2 Ground Floor (Level 1) E. Erie Street
SUPPLY RETURN EXHAUST
N. McClurg Court
UP
UP
E. Ontario Street 0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 63
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.3 Public Parking Floor (Level 3)
SUPPLY RETURN EXHAUST
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 64
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.4 Staff Parking/ Mechanical Room (Level 9-10)
SUPPLY FRESH AIR PLENUM
RETURN
AHU for SKY LOBBY
AHU for O.P.
AHU for SKY LOBBY
EXHAUST AIR PLENUM
EXHAUST
AHU for MOB
FRESH AIR PLENUM
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 65
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.5 Sky Lobby (Level 13)
SUPPLY RETURN
UP
EXHAUST
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 66
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.6 Inpatient Floor - Typical (Level 25-36)
SUPPLY RETURN EXHAUST
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
25
50
100
N 67
15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.7 Top Mechanical Floor (Level 41-42)
SUPPLY RETURN
AHU for HOTEL
AHU for INPATIENT
FRESH AIR PLENUM
AHU for HOTEL
AHU for INPATIENT
FRESH AIR PLENUM
0
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
EXHAUST AIR PLENUM
EXHAUST AIR PLENUM
EXHAUST
25
50
100
N 68
16 Area Tabulation - Departmental Summary Floor
Major Functional Areas
Basement
Electrical Vault
Level 1, 13, 13M Level 1 Level 1 Level 1 Level 13 Level 13 Level 13 Level 13 Level 13M
Public
Total Departmental NSF Required
CafĂŠ (On Sky Lobby) Security Dietary
Level P11
Mechanical
Level 1, 13M, 14
Administration
Total Departmental NSF Provided
29,825 4,105
635 2,325 785 4,230
1,350 1,010 15,385
Institutional Advancement/ Women's Board
Level 13M Level 13M Level 1
Education/Conferencing Space Global Patient Services Bike Storage/Showers
Level 14
Non-Clinical Support Service
14,950
Level 14
10,720
Level 14 Level 14
Physician Practice Administration Clinical Administration Consulting Physician Space
Level 14
Medical Education/ Residents
2,255
Level 14
Information Systems/ Telecommunications Executive Suite
4,315
Level 15-18
MOB
Level 19-21
Outpatient Services
Level 19-21 Level 19-21 Level 19-21
Outpatient Pediatric Day Rehab Neuro/Neuromuscular Physician Center Neuro/Neuromuscular Therapy Center Musculoskeletal Physical & Theraphy Center Center for Pain Management
Level 19-21 Level 19-21 Level 19-21 Level 19-21
Prosthetics Orthotics & Assistive Tech Program Wheelchair Room
Level 19-21 Level 21
Inpatient Support
Level 21 Level 21 Level 21 Level 21 Level 21 Level 22
37,227 3,660 4,443 2,141 697 3,009 737 4,620 2,940
+25% +150%
+10% +29% -6% +9%
Research
1,000
73%
+39% -26%
2,760 1,420 15,322
62,304
+0%
74,765
21,540
Increase NSF to enhance meronic value Increase NSF to enhance meronic value
Added to program for conference and training center prefunction
Decentralize portion of the dietary program to each inpatient floor 83% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.20
16,065 1,070 700
3,390 345
4,725 150,000
150,000
0%
173,399
87%
72,410
73,600
+2%
103,040
71% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.40
21,236
+7%
29,730
71% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.40
33,969
+2%
43,820
78% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.29
8,181 7,859 9,040 11,525 12,700 8,245 11,745 3,115
7,050 3,770 1,510 5,470 2,080 33,381
Level 22
Neuroscience & Engineering Research Office
25,750
Level 22
Neuroscience & Engineering Research Office Support
3,700
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
Remarks
3,705
19,880 Material Management Environmental Service Medical Records Facilities/Biomed Admitting
Efficiency (NSF/GSF)
50,707 5,249 5,956 2,926 872 3,530 872 8,440 3,360
2,178 1,400 11,402
62,240
Level 13M
Level 14
Comparison (% Increase Total Departmental Gross Area Provided
or Decrease)
-
Ground Lobby Retail (on Ground Lobby) CafĂŠ (on Ground Lobby) Volunteer Life Center Chapel/Spiritual Care Sky Lobby Sky Lobby - Mezzanine
Level 13 Level 1 & 13 Level 13
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Department
69
16 Area Tabulation - Departmental Summary Floor
Major Functional Areas
Department
Total Departmental NSF Required
Level 22
Neuroscience & Engineering Research Research Support
2,931
Level 22
Clinical Research Office
1,000
Neuroscience & Engineering Research Center for Aphasia Other Research Related Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes & Research
Level 23-36
Inpatient Inpatient Care Pediatrics
Level 23-24
Step down RICU
Comparison (% Increase Total Departmental Gross Area Provided
Efficiency (NSF/GSF)
Remarks
or Decrease)
Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below
-
253,982
434,838
+71%
572,507
76%
152,764 17,079
265,720 30,440
+74% +78%
352,730 42,240
75%
6,262
8,530
+36%
11,440
Increase 2450 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points
Level 26-30
Brain 1, 2, 3 (18,489 NSF per floor)
55,467
98,860
+78%
129,730
Increase 4500 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points
Level 31-33
Neuromusculoskeletal 1, 2 (18,489 NSF per floor)
36,978
63,945
+73%
84,660
Increase 4500 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points
Level 34-36
Spinal Cord 1, 2 (18,489 NSF per floor)
36,978
63,945
+73%
84,660
Increase 4500 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points
Level 23-36
Ability Lab Pediatrics Obstacle Course Non-inpatient Brain Lab 1 Brain Lab 2 Neuromusculoskeletal Lab Flex Lab Spinal Cord Lab
54,989 6,694 7,964 3,331 10,213 5,657 11,059
122,889 14,512 17,760
+123% +117% +57%
162,395 22,692 22,932
17,908 18,031 18,121 18,232 18,325
+75% +219% +64% +82%
23,136 23,262 23,353 23,464 23,556
Research Neuroscience & Engineering Research Center for Aphasia Other Research Related Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes & Research
27,346 21,296
27,346
0%
29,162
94%
Inpatient Clinical
18,883
18,883
0%
28,220
67% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.50
90,160
72%
Level 23-36
Level 25
Dialysis Radiology Services Laboratory Therapeutic Recreation Pharmacy ADL Apartment/ Car Transfers
10,071
Increase NSF to allow for flexibilty in future use Combine Obstacle Course and Non-Inpatient Ability Labs into one double-height ability lab Increase NSF to allow for flexibilty in future use Allow for flexibility in future expansion
1,105 9,783 2,885 1,125 3,535 450
Hotel
Level 37-40
Shelled
-
148,915
Level 41-42
Mechanical
-
56,440
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
76%
1,660 1,950 2,440
Level 37-40
Required Department Net Areas Provided Department Net Areas Departmental Gross Area Provided Overall Building Efficiency
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Total Departmental NSF Provided
-
64,608
621,718 877,782 1,217,108 72%
- Not included in efficiency calculations -
Excluding shelled floors
70
Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Date: Location: Time:
Friday, October 18, 2013 Room 17, Temple Buell Hall, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Reviewers Dr. Michael Kim, AIA, NCARB Todd Eicken John Gresko Brian Vitale Scott Hurst
Professor of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Senior Vice President, HDR Senior Project Architect, HDR Design Director, Gensler Associate Project Designer, Gensler
Student Team Members Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp Summary The purpose of the Concept Design (Mid-Semester) Review on October 18, 2013 was for the student team to share their work and receive feedback from the teaching offices HDR and Gensler. The in-progress design was well received by the reviewers. Major decisions were viewed favorably, such as the vertical stacking and the Ability Lab as a prominent feature on the north-east portion of the building. The reviewers challenged the student team to further explore the meronic quality of the design to better engage the pedestrian and the community, while ensuring continuity of experience from ground level to the upper floors. The following is a synopsis of the Concept Design (Mid-Semester) Review Meeting. Meronic Value 1. Further develop the meronic quality, especially the research and the community components 2. Community engagement – consider something more than just retail, plaza, and amenities; suggestions: - How would you enhance pedestrian quality, through design elements such as lighting, design, colors, etc.? - How does the building affect, touch, and engage individuals? 3. Revisit the project goals and objectives, and think about how they intersect and enhance the idea of engagement 4. Consider more possibilities and flexibilities for public engagement - Design spaces that are less specific - Leave room for imagination so users can decide how they can use the space - Connect the north and south ends of the ground lobby, and become one entity - Provide a small cafe on the north end of lobby for the medical community ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
71
Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Aesthetics 1. Enforce the brand of RIC; suggestions: - Reinforce consistent identity and continuity of experience between the ground lobby and sky lobby - Colors in interior spaces can be more provocative, bold, and daring 2. Further enhance the outdoor spaces 3. Introduce layering and sequence of space and experience 4. Develop a common vocabulary in plans to improve the spatial organization 5. Lower the ceiling height at the sky lobby reception desk (7’-0”) 6. The horizontal language is very prominent. Consider something different for the Ability Lab, e.g. weaving of horizontality and verticality 7. Consider curves in the design; curves play an important role in patient experience Functionality Ground Floor 1. Use air-lock vestibule and sliding doors on ground floor entrances, because revolving doors are challenging for people with disabilities 2. Move entrances further south to avoid traffic back-up at drop-off 3. Remove the island and columns in the drop-off zone (increase the span) 4. Layout furniture groups so they are more engaging with the lobby space Parking 5. Parking is the first experience for many building users; develop further in terms of design & aesthetics 6. Show ADA symbols in parking spots 7. Consider using 45’ bays and reduce the number of columns; avoid columns at the corners of traffic paths ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
72
Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Functionality (Continued) 8. Consider consolidating staff parking and staff elevators. Should be left for hospital management to decide? 9. 40% or more openings in garage,would eliminate the need for mechanical Mechanical 10. Consider placing the mechanical floors under the sky lobby; reasons: - Noise and vibration of the equipment from the mechanical floors can be disruptive - Separate maintenance staff from the patient/public traffic 11. Increase the number and size of air shafts (4 times) Sky Lobby 12. The stairs in the sky lobby could be viewed as an obstacle for people with disabilities; however, if stairs are placed, be sure it is monumental and become an experience for the patient (that they feel confident about walking up and down the stairs in the public space) 13. Give stronger definition to the mezzanine level - Make it an experience, more than just waiting space - Can introduce more amenities for the hotel guests, administrative offices Inpatient Floor 14. Connect circulation in elevator lobby (remove dead end) 15. Can remove charting desk outside patient room, because patients are not in acute conditions 16. Respite rooms at the ends of corridor are successful 17. Create stronger destination points on patient floors, similar to the activity room we have placed along the hallway; in addition, consider: - Introduce street experience along the corridor - Place landmarks and destination points - Use instruments of measurements, e.g. floor pattern, lighting - Create moment of respite, movement and mobility 18. Ability Lab is the heart and soul of RIC, and therefore: - Can be more distinct from the rest of the building (structural and aesthetic expression) ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
73
Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Functionality (Continued) - Become a strong symbol of RIC - Improve the form of the Ability Lab; can be more specific to RIC’s identity and its “soul” - Refer to Ralph Johnson’s Boeing Headquarters building - Think of it as a “ beacon”, but consider from the pedestrian’s standpoint and also the city’s skyline (building is visible from the Michigan Avenue bridge) - Introduce transitional zone between patient room to the ability lab; be more gracious 19. Express strong connection with research component: - Must be planned on the patient floor also - Workspaces for the researchers at RIC are similar to our studio space, very active; researchers work long hours - Doctors work in private offices and their work hours are regular 20. Develop the roof top level with undulating landscape and garden space; not just a place for cooling tower Other Suggestions 1. Pause and slow down when renderings are shown; describe the experience as shown in the rendering 2. (For our information) Drop-off lanes need to be very spacious because patients take a lot of time to get off or board (up to 20 to 30 minutes) Next Steps - Priority 1. Explore meronic quality of the design further; look for examples of urban plaza and landscape design 2. Revisit the structural grid, reduce the number of columns and add transfer girders 3. Refine and enhance the Ability Lab form, giving it a stronger identity 4. Revise vertical stacking for mechanical and research floors 5. Strengthen inpatient floor plans with research program and refine transition to the ability lab The foregoing represents our understanding of matters discussed and conclusions reached. Other participants are requested to review these items and advise the originator in writing of any errors or omissions. ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
74
Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
75
Appendix B References “LEED 2009 for Healthcare: New Construction and Major Renovations.”, accessed Nov. 27, 2013, http://www.usgbc.org/ resources/healthcare-v2009-checklist-xls. “Spaulding Hospital / Perkins+Will.”, accessed Dec 2, 2013, http://www.archdaily.com/443408/spaulding-hospita-perkinswill/. Guidelines for Design and Construction of Health Care Facilities 2010. 2010th ed. Chicago, IL: American Society for Healthcare Engineering of the American Hospital Association. Allen, Edward and Joseph Iano. 2007. The Architect’s Studio Companion: Rules of Thumb for Preliminary Design. Fourth ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. 1998. Americans with Disabilities Act: Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG) US Access Board. Babyak, Maria, Aleta Budd, Cavin Costello, Christopher Crocker, Justin Dicristofalo, Christopher Godfrey, Brittany Levine, Michael Prattico, Bridgette Treado, and Joseph Yacobellis. 2008. “Parking.” Graduate Degree Project Studio, Northeastern University School of Architecture. Ching, Francis DK. 2008. Building Construction Illustrated. Fourth ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Dishman, Lydia. 2011. The Hospital Room of the Future: Flexible, Media Rich, very Shiny. Grondzik, Walter T., Alison G. Kwok, Benjamin Stein, and John S. Reynolds. 2011. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Hutlock, Todd. 2012. “In the City, of the City: Lurie Children’s Hospital.” Healthcare Design Magazine 12 (11): 120-129. Kim, Michael Kyong-il. 2010. “What would You Say Now, Mr. Vitruvius? Building Design Technology, then & Now.” Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Design Education, ConnectED 2010, Jun 28 – Jul 1, 2010, Sydney, Australia. ———. 2013. “Design Reasoning: The Logic, the Structure, & Strategies.” Presented at the 3rd Annual International Conference on Architecture, Jun 10-13, 2013, Athens, Greece. ———. “Integrative Design of Buildings: Principles and Strategies, Chapter 1: Buildings and the Design Teleology.” Neufert, Ernst and Peter Neufert. 2000. Architects’ Data, edited by Bousmaha Baiche, Nicholas Walliman. Third ed. WileyBlackwell. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. “RIC - Advancing Human Ability (TM).”, accessed Nov, 27, 2013, http://www.ric.org/. Walker, Carl and Timothy Haahs. 2005. “Parking Planning.” In The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice, edited by The American Institute of Architects. 2006th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim
Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp
76