Journal of Education and Practice ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 14, 2012
www.iiste.org
APPENDIX Tables indicating performances of participants Table 1: Responses for research question one. CWHI Pre-test and post-test mean scores and standard deviation on lip reading. N = 36. Experimental groups
Pre-test
Post-test
Group 1 Mean
12.50
11.67
N
18
12
STD
3.54
2.72
10.08
10.75
N
18
12
STD
3.50
2.34
6.94
14.31
N
36
36
STD
2.35
2.35
Group 1 Mean
Total Mean
Main gain scores 6.17
8.67
7.37
Table2: Summary of the one way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on CWHI post-test scores on lip reading test. Sources
Type III
df
Mean square
F
Significant decision at
Sum
0.05 Corrected model
197.511a
6
33.252
2.972
.00
Intercept
653.855
1
653.855
158.912
.000
Post-test
1.843
1
1.843
.449
.508
Treatment
76.279
3
38.140
9.384
.001
.S
Gender
12.915
1
12.915
3.244
.087
.NS
Treatment X
31.942
2
15.971
3.888
.032
.S
Error
115.032
2
4.108
Total
6516.00
30
Corrected total
311.543
36
* Significant at 0.05 level * Not significant at 0.05 level of significance Table 3: Result of scheffe test for post-test on lip reading. Test Achievement score of the treatment group: Experimental Groups (1)
Mean difference
Std
Sign
with CWHI amplification
6.061*
.936
.124
CWHI without amplification
-3.083*
.916
.008
Experimental Groups
The mean difference is significant at 0.05 level.
115