12 minute read

U.S. Navy Aerial Surveys 1926-1929

“During the summers of 1926 to 1929, Sargent was on loan from the Survey to the Departments of Interior and Agriculture, under whose aegis he participated in the groundbreaking Naval Alaskan Survey Expeditions that mapped Alaska from the air, the first aerial surveys the United States government undertook.” —from Mapping the Frontier: A Memoir of Discovery from Coastal Maine to the Alaskan Rim, by R. Harvey Sargent

Taku Glacier, 1926

Taku Glacier, 1926

U.S. Navy photo

Advertisement

'The Mineral Resources of Alaska' was an annual compilation of the distribution, character, origin, and extent of the territory’s ore deposits, recording the kinds and quantity of minerals produced; mining developments and production of significance to the prospector, miner, or businessman; and in general as thorough a report on the Last Frontier’s mineral resources as could be produced at the time.

In the twenty-fourth such report, produced by The Geographic Survey for 1927, on page 74, under the heading ‘Projects In Progress During Season of 1927, the following was reported: “One of the most important pieces of work that was started in the winter of 1926-27 and will be continued for several years is the compilation and working up into maps of the aerial pictures taken by the Navy Department, at the request of the Geological Survey, of a large part of southeastern Alaska. This work has been largely under the technical direction of R. H. Sargent, with the cooperation of F. H. Moffit in special phases of the work.”

Due to funding problems the aerial surveys were suspended in 1928, but the 1929 'Mineral Resources of Alaska' report included this update: “Topographic supervision of aerial photographic work in southeastern Alaska was a continuation of a project started in 1926, when the Navy Department, at the request of the Geological Survey, photographed from the air about 10,000 square miles of southeastern Alaska, so that the resulting pictures might be used for preparing maps of the region. This work was so successful and of such inestimable value, not only to the Geological Survey but also to other Government bureaus, notably the Forest Service, that in the winter of 1928-29 the Geological Survey joined with the Forest Service in requesting the Navy Department to send another expedition to continue the work in tracts that had not been photographed. The Navy Department, recognizing the need of these bureaus and the excellent training that the work afforded for its own members, assigned the necessary personnel and equipment under command of Lieut. Commander A.W. Radford. This unit photographed about 12,000 square miles of difficult country with speed, precision, and high technical competence, and the resulting films were turned over to the Geological Survey for cartographic use. In the course of this work many services were rendered to other Government bureaus concerned with Alaskan development The successful accomplishment of this difficult piece of work without accident demonstrates the great value of the airplane as a means of transportation in a country that is almost untraversable by any other means, and shows the economy that can be effected in many phases of the Geological Survey's work by this modern method of attack. In order that the naval officers might have knowledge of the requirements, a skilled topographic engineer of the Alaskan branch, R. H. Sargent, was attached to the expedition and served throughout its field work.”

Photograph of some of the officers and crew of the Alaska Aerial Survey Detachment at Juneau, August 10, 1929; visible behind the men is one of the Loening OL-8 amphibian planes, used in photo-mapping flights over S.E. Alaska.

Photograph of some of the officers and crew of the Alaska Aerial Survey Detachment at Juneau, August 10, 1929; visible behind the men is one of the Loening OL-8 amphibian planes, used in photo-mapping flights over S.E. Alaska.

U. S. Navy photo

In 'Mineral Resources of Alaska,' 1926, an article by R. S. Sargent and Fred H. Moffitt described the history underlying the expedition: “Making maps from airplane photographs is a relatively new undertaking which did not become practicable until the great advances in airplane construction and operation arising from the necessities of the World War took place. Airplane photographs and maps made from them were of inestimable value to the conduct of war by both sides, and since the war they have become increasingly important for the peacetime enterprises of all countries. In the United States private interests have devoted much though and spent large sums of money in the development of methods for adapting airplane photographs to map making. Different departments and bureaus of the Federal Government also have no only been engaged in investigations of the same kind but have during the last few years photographed for map making considerable areas in different parts of the United States. The work has received special attention from the engineers of the United States Army, who have had a leading part in the development of the method used in the surveys here to be described.”

The photographers and their cameras.

The photographers and their cameras.

U. S. Navy photo

A few paragraphs later, “Many reasons were involved in the choice of southeastern Alaska as the area in which to begin the work. First of all, its numerous waterways make it easily accessible to the boats of the Navy, which were to provide accommodations for the men and care for the planes of the expedition. This in itself was almost a deciding reason, because any other plan would have involved a much greater expenditure of money. Again, this part of Alaska includes the most extensive and valuable of its forests, extensive mining and fishing interests, and a considerable proportion of the population. Furthermore, the work of the Coast and Geodetic Survey in southeastern Alaska furnishes much control for assembling the data contained in the pictures, and the need of maps in this region is immediate and great.”

Aerial photo of Juneau, the expedition base while in the area was the long dock on the left.

Aerial photo of Juneau, the expedition base while in the area was the long dock on the left.

U. S. Navy photo

Sargent and Moffit went on to share specifics of organizing the project. “The tender Gannet … was detailed from the Bureau of Operations and was well equipped for the work, as her regular duty was service as tender for the airplane carrier Langley. A barge 140 feet long and 40 feet wide, housed over and provided with a bulkhead forward sufficiently strong to withstand any seas she might meet, furnished additional room, especially that required for the photographic operations of the expedition.

The Government Dock at Juneau. The amphibious planes were parked on the dock and the U.S.S. Gannett (next to dock) and the restructured barge (beside the Gannett) were moored alongside.

The Government Dock at Juneau. The amphibious planes were parked on the dock and the U.S.S. Gannett (next to dock) and the restructured barge (beside the Gannett) were moored alongside.

U. S. Navy photo

“The barge was equipped and manned as a separate unit and could function properly in the absence of the Gannet. All the photographic operations were performed on her, and for this purpose three rooms were provided as photographic laboratories. The rest of her space was taken up with a kitchen, dining room, office for the clerical force, rooms for the commanding officer, other offices, hospital, the petty officers' and enlisted men's quarters, engine repair shop, store room, and barber shop. On the after end was a loft for carrier pigeons. An electric lighting system was installed to furnish light when the Gannet was separated from the barge.”

Planes passing over Twin Glaciers Lake at the Head of Taku Inlet

Planes passing over Twin Glaciers Lake at the Head of Taku Inlet

U.S. Navy photo

The central role held by R. Harvey Sargent was explained: “R. H. Sargent was designated representative of the Geological Survey to accompany the expedition. Mr. Sargent was to act in an advisory capacity only and was directed also to cooperate so far as practicable with the other Government bureaus and with civilians who had an interest in the work. The choice of the specific areas to be flown rested with him and also the preparation of the flight charts, which gave the spacing and direc- tion of the flights. He later inspected the developed film to make certain that sufficient overlap of pictures was being provided and that no areas were left uncovered by the pictures. Finally he received the film and transmitted it to the Geological Survey in Washington.”

Introductions to other key personnel, detailed descriptions of the camera equipment, and an appreciation for the cooperation of various government and civil entities, as well as private companies and individuals involved, led into an explanation of the field operations of the expedition: “The first requirements for surveying an extensive area by airplane photography are a systematic plan for taking the photographs and the choice of an appropriate height for flying. The height of flying depends in part on the relief of the country to be photographed and the height of the clouds, if any are present, but is limited by the ability of the plane to reach and fly economically at the desired altitude. The altitude adopted for the work in southeastern Alaska was 10,000 feet, although the detail of the photographs would have been amply sufficient and a greater area could have been covered with the same number of pictures if it had been practicable to fly at a higher altitude. This altitude gave the resulting photographs a scale of approximately 1:20,000, which is much greater than the publication scale of the maps that are to be made from them.”

Toward the end of their article Sargent and Moffit summed up the work: “The season's field work when completed was represented only by developed rolls of film from which prints were to be made in the office. Each of these rolls consisted of several pieces, the film having been cut to facilitate the developing. Each roll contained on the average about 180 sets of three negatives, or a total of 540 negatives to the roll. The total number of negatives from which prints were to be made was approximately 17,280. The area covered by these negatives is about 10,000 square miles and includes a large part of southeastern Alaska specifically the islands of Revillagigedo, Annette, Gravina, and Duke, Cleveland Peninsula and Chickamin River, the islands of Wrangell, Woronkofski, Etolin, Zarembo, Long, Dall. Sikkwan, Prince of Wales, Tuxekan, Heceta, Kosciusko, Mitkof, Kupreanof, Kuiu, and Admiralty, and Lindenberg Peninsula. The choice of areas to be flown was based primarily upon their economic importance to the work of the Geological Survey and other bureaus interested, principally the Forest Service.”

In the March-April, 1930 issue of The Military Engineer, published by the Society of American Military Engineers, an article appeared, ‘Photographing Alaska from the Air,’ again by R. H. Sargent, Topographic Engineer, United States Geological Survey, with an update on the expedition’s progress: “It was my pleasure to describe in The Military Engineer, May-June, 1928, the work of the Aerial Survey Expedition of the Navy Department, which was sent to Alaska in 1928 for the purpose of making aerial photographs of the 10,000 square miles of the southeastern part of the Territory.

“During the past three years, these photographs have been utilized and studied by the Geological Survey in making base maps and by the Forest Service in studying the problems relating to the forests and the potential water power of the region. During this time their real worth has been realized by officials of both services and the data which these photographs yield are invaluable in the execution of the work of these bureaus.”

After a nod to the 112 man crew, noting “…the Navy may be justifiably proud of them,” Sargent explained more details of the expedition: “The equipment consisted of the airplane tender Gannet and a converted 110-foot ammunition barge, both of which had been attached to the 1926 expedition, and four Loening amphibian planes. The Gannet furnished motor power and light for the barge, towing it to Alaska and back and moving it from place to place while in Alaskan waters. Water which was consumed in large quantities because of the photographic work in the dark rooms usually came from the local water supply of the towns at which we based. This year, the great value of the 54-foot boom of the Gannet was realized, for it was extensively used in hoisting the planes from the water to the docks where they were kept, and back to the water again.”

“Four Loening amphibian planes of the latest model, OL-8A, were used. These planes bore the names of the four Southeastern Alaskan cities at which the expedition planned to base; Juneau, Ketchikan, Petersburg and Sitka. These names, and the insignia of the expedition which was painted on the planes attracted much attention. The insignia was a large black circle within which the predominant figure was a seal standing erect upon its tail with its flippers extended as if in the act of flying. On one side was a flaming red midnight sun and on the other was an active volcano belching forth a stream of crimson lava. It was known as ‘The Flying Seal.’

“In the cooperative scheme, the Navy furnished the personnel, equipment, and all expenses usually incurred in the functioning of such a unit. The civil bureaus vitally interested in supplying the funds necessary for securing the photographs, which included films, paper, and chemicals; gas an oil for the planes while on photographic flights; the expenses of the crews when away from the ship; and other incidental expenses. It was a most worthy act on the part of the officials of the Navy Department to be willing to enter into such an enterprise to assist other departments. It demonstrated again what can and should be done in circumstances where one federal agency can be of assistance to other agencies without impairing its own efficiency. “

Later in the article Sargent shares this about photographing the many glaciers the expedition flew over: “It was my purpose to have the fronts of all large glaciers in the region photographed, both by the mapping and the oblique cameras, so as to record the position of the fronts of the glaciers in 1929. The oblique photographs, taken from the side of the plane, are marvels of grandeur and beauty, and the mapping photographs present wonderful views of the glaciers from directly overhead. These vertical photographs reveal the phenomenon of glacier flow in a manner never before recorded in the United States, so far as I know. It is believed that there is a wealth of valuable scientific information for the glaciologist in these pictures.”

The Grand Pacific Glacier from the Head of Tarr Inlet, Glacier Bay

The Grand Pacific Glacier from the Head of Tarr Inlet, Glacier Bay

U.S. Navy photo

In their 1926 article for 'Mineral Resources of Alaska,' Sargent and Moffitt explained, “The aerophotographic surveys in southeastern Alaska were in a certain degree experimental. Their purpose was to apply a new method of surveying, which has certain marked advantages over the older methods, as well as some disadvantages, and which was being used with success in parts of the United States and elsewhere, to a region where surveying by any method meets with many difficulties. The photographs were not expected to furnish all the data for a completed map but to give quickly certain features, such as crest lines, stream courses, distribution of forests, and culture, with a detail and accuracy that could be obtained by the usual surveying methods only by the expenditure of much time and money. It was recognized that the pictures would not have in themselves all the control required for combining them into a map. The photographic work was preliminary to further field work in which the material compiled from the pictures will supply a base map which the topographer will take into the field and on which he will sketch the topography according to the usual methods.” ~•~

To see a photograph album of the Alaskan Aerial Survey at the San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives, visit https://tinyurl.com/AASalbum