II. INTERNATIONAL SMART CITIES
S.No. Continent
Firstly, I started with the general typology analysis and further moved towards characterizing the cities in terms of smart objectives and dimensions. Later I will be studying one relevant smart project from each 25 cities and try to connect them to Indian context. How they are relevant? what useful methods or principles can be used in Indian cities?
Vienna
414.
2
Netherlands
Amsterdam
219.
3
Spain
Barcelona
101
England
London
1,57
5
Denmark
Copenhagen
86.
6
Finland
Helsinki
715.
7
England
Manchester
115
8
Washington
Seattle
9
California
San Francisco
USA
New York
141,3
11
Massachusetts
Boston
232.
12
Canada
Toronto
630.
Brazil
Rio De Janeiro
1,22
Mexico
Mexico City
1,48
Brazil
Sau Paulo
1,22
South Africa
Cape Town
400.
South Africa
Johannesburg
334.
State of Victoria
Melbourne
9,990
New South Wales
Sydney
12,36
20
China
Beijing
16,4
21
United Arab Emirates Dubai
4,11
China
Hong Kong
2,75
Singapore
Singapore
719
24
Abu Dhabi
Masdar City
25
Japan
Tokyo
10
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
23
56 |
Master Thesis | Alankrita Sarkar
Area (K
Austria
22
Table 4.1: Smart city typologies Source: Drawn by Author
City
1
4
The 25 cities around the world are selected from all the continents to access the differences in their smart city applications. The 25 cities are mostly representative smart cities of the continents. To use these examples in my initiatives, I started categorizing and clustering them under various attributes.
Country
Europe
America
South America Africa Australia
Asia
17
600
6
2,187