Guideline Note on Data Privacy for Digital Financial Services

Page 29

29

AFI GUIDELINE NOTE ON DATA PRIVACY FOR DIGITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES

PILLAR 5: SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENT This Pillar covers a range of important issues relevant to supervision and enforcement including risk-based supervision; supervisory mandate, powers, capacity and resources; the need for consultation and coordination on an ongoing basis; establishing a credible threat of enforcement and considering data privacy in a regulatory sandbox environment. 5.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLE: TAKE A RISK-BASED AND PROPORTIONATE APPROACH TO SUPERVISION KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: Supervise DP4DFS rules on a firm and market risk > basis. Develop a methodology for assessing privacy risks in > DFS business models from e.g., information sources, information sensitivity, use cases and systems interconnectivity.

5.3 GUIDING PRINCIPLE: ESTABLISH CLEAR CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION FRAMEWORK KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: Provide for ongoing consultation and coordination > with public sector stakeholders on policy and regulatory issues, FinTech innovations and systemic DP4DFS issues. Implement consultation mechanism with DFS industry > and civil society groups (e.g., privacy advocates and consumer associations). Consider if Industry Advisory Group is desirable.65 > > Establish MOUs with key regulators and government agencies. > Consider regional data privacy initiatives.

5.4 GUIDING PRINCIPLE: CONSIDER DP4DFS ISSUES IN REGULATORY SANDBOX ENVIRONMENTS KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: > Consider data privacy issues when testing DFS innovations in regulatory sandboxes. > Consider thematic regulatory sandboxes specifically for DP4DFS innovations.

5.5 GUIDING PRINCIPLE: ENSURE CREDIBLE THREAT OF ENFORCEMENT KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

5.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLE: ENSURE SUPERVISORS HAVE EFFECTIVE MANDATE, POWERS, CAPACITY, AND RESOURCES

Ensure sanctions are significant enough to be > effective.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

> Require notice of significant breaches to regulators/ and data subjects.

> Provide supervisors with clear DP4DFS mandate. > Ensure appropriate powers for supervisor e.g., to supervise, to assess use of FinTech-related technologies or require evidence of how they are used; to issue fines, to grant exemptions, to make orders to ban/suspend DFS processing practices, to register or de-register data controllers and to handle complaints.

> Publicize all enforcement action.

Consider making provision for fines to be a > percentage of profits or turnover and/or a specified flat amount. > Consider basing fines on severity of breaches.

> Ensure supervisor has organizational and technological capacity and resources to design, implement and supervise DP4DFS now and in future, taking into account likely FinTech developments. > Consider current environment and likely future developments. e.g., open banking.

65 See, for example, Personal Data Protection Advisory Committee in Malaysia


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Guideline Note on Data Privacy for Digital Financial Services by Alliance for Financial Inclusion - Issuu