blocks quickly without lowering the market price and thereby impairing the return to themselves. What's more, the CEO's of the companies barely have any stock in their portfolios, eliminating the alignment with shareholder values. Instead, it's become vogue to pay these CEO's via stock options, giving them an incentive to show short term results and then cash out their options while the rest of the investing public holds shares that were sold by insiders. This is done by using unwitting brokers, paid analysts and unquestioning media to tow the company line. And because the CEO's and the companies have been held in high esteem, no one questions the use of these tools or their motives. Penny stock companies often use similar tools. Only with a penny stock it's called stock promotion. And penny stock companies have better motives: without stock promotion, the best company in the world won't be worth anything because no one would have heard of it - and therefore the enterprise would be hard pressed to raise money for growth. Promotion should be a driving investment criterion for choosing a penny stock. The issue with promotion is that the SEC often believes that stock promotion involving a penny stock needs more supervision than the promotion being conducted by billion dollar house hold names. Is there in fact an opportunity for fraud in the penny stock market? Of course there is. But I contend that the risk is much higher with well established companies that have CEO's holding stock options (big motive for early liquidation since options expire) rather than actual restricted stock (unsellable) for which they actually paid (as many penny stock companies experience). Empirical proof is offered by the billions lost in the financial sector right under the nose of, and with the blessing of the SEC and other regulatory bodies than has ever been lost on penny stocks. 3. Penny stocks are often accused of being used by scam artists who sell them through spam email or off-shore brokers. As the recent IRS/SEC probes have proven, many, many, many American CEO's have offshore accounts making them no more honest or dishonest than the operators of penny stock companies. Both traditional penny stock startups and the fallen as exemplified by the financial sector have the potential for growth and for fraud. Both are blighted by cash requirements, by short sellers and by image problems. The difference is that the fallen companies have the government and SEC fighting for them while the typical startup penny stock company is vilified. The dichotomy is even more surprising when we stop to think that economists have long been telling us, and the American experience has long proved that the start-up is what drives the economy, diversifies the job base, creates the most jobs and is lean enough to take advantage of changing times. So I ask you America: Are all Penny Stocks Created Equal?
[http://www.pennystockjockey.com]