The Impact of non-Equidistance on Anova and Alternative Methods

Page 6

Bjorn Lantz

3.2 Brown-Forsythe test

The results regarding the Brown-Forsythe test are presented in tables 5a–5d. When the effect size is 0.00, the MAPE values are generally low when all sample sizes are large (albeit higher than when ANOVA is used to analyze data), and generally high when all sample sizes are small. When sample sizes are unequal, the MAPE values are considerably higher under the Brown-Forsythe test than under the ANOVA test. In these cases, many results differ significantly from the equidistant case. This indicates that the actual significance level is rather sensitive to non-equidistance. The MAPE values are also generally higher when data are skewed, for all combinations of sample sizes. Table 5a: Brown-Forsythe test, symmetric case with equally spaced means f 0.00

n1,n2,n3 25,25,25 5,5,5 5,5,25 5,25,25

Eq 0.051 0.046 0.050 0.055

V1 0.050 0.042* 0.047 0.052

V2 0.050 0.034* 0.044* 0.049*

V3 0.051 0.047 0.054 0.063*

V4 0.051 0.047 0.052 0.059*

V5 0.050 0.036* 0.051 0.056

V6 0.051 0.044 0.049 0.054

MAPE 2.1% 21.0% 5.7% 11.1%

0.10

25,25,25 5,5,5 5,5,25 5,25,25

0.106 0.053 0.064 0.077

0.103 0.048* 0.060* 0.073

0.101 0.040* 0.044* 0.061*

0.104 0.054 0.066 0.082*

0.105 0.053 0.065 0.081

0.101 0.040* 0.083* 0.091*

0.104 0.050 0.060* 0.074

2.5% 20.2% 16.7% 10.5%

0.25

25,25,25 5,5,5 5,5,25 5,25,25

0.452 0.098 0.152 0.215

0.447 0.090* 0.143* 0.206*

0.435* 0.079* 0.104* 0.167*

0.437* 0.100 0.145* 0.209

0.447 0.099 0.145* 0.211

0.429* 0.077* 0.195* 0.251*

0.450 0.094 0.141* 0.206*

2.7% 17.8% 24.4% 11.6%

0.844 0.188 0.299* 0.435*

0.827* 0.150* 0.378* 0.508*

0.848 0.180* 0.302* 0.437*

1.4% 16.1% 27.2% 12.6%

0.40

25,25,25 0.849 0.845 0.832* 0.832* 5,5,5 0.188 0.175* 0.154* 0.186 5,5,25 0.318 0.302* 0.241* 0.296* 5,25,25 0.453 0.437* 0.372* 0.434* Note: ’*’ indicates a significant difference from the equidistant case

Table 5b: Brown-Forsythe test, symmetric case with one extreme and two equal means f 0.00

n1,n2,n3 25,25,25 5,5,5 5,5,25 5,25,25

Eq 0.050 0.045 0.048 0.054

V1 0.049 0.041* 0.045 0.052

V2 0.049 0.034* 0.043* 0.048*

V3 0.051 0.046 0.053* 0.061*

V4 0.050 0.046 0.051 0.059*

V5 0.049 0.036* 0.050 0.054

V6 0.049 0.043 0.047 0.053

MAPE 1.3% 20.0% 6.6% 12.9%

0.10

25,25,25 5,5,5 5,5,25 5,25,25

0.108 0.052 0.061 0.098

0.107 0.048* 0.059 0.096

0.104 0.040* 0.062 0.087*

0.108 0.053 0.067* 0.098

0.109 0.053 0.065 0.100

0.106 0.042* 0.050* 0.106*

0.107 0.050 0.062 0.096

1.6% 18.1% 7.0% 4.6%

0.25

25,25,25 5,5,5 5,5,25 5,25,25

0.451 0.095 0.123 0.335

0.446 0.090* 0.120 0.329

0.426* 0.075* 0.123 0.308*

0.432* 0.090* 0.127 0.306*

0.439* 0.091 0.127 0.313*

0.445 0.084* 0.095* 0.358*

0.447 0.091 0.124 0.328

2.8% 17.9% 11.3% 14.5%

0.842* 0.167* 0.243 0.649*

0.849* 0.178 0.206* 0.707*

0.854 0.174* 0.248 0.674*

1.5% 16.9% 14.2% 14.1%

0.40

25,25,25 0.856 0.852 0.836* 0.835* 5,5,5 0.182 0.173* 0.147* 0.165* 5,5,25 0.247 0.244 0.240* 0.241 5,25,25 0.686 0.676* 0.647* 0.639* Note: ’*’ indicates a significant difference from the equidistant case www.ejbrm.com

21

©ACPIL


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.