Aid for nutrition 2013 final

Page 25

AID FOR NUTRITION

The G8 donors increased their overall funding for nutrition, in terms of volume and proportion of ODA, from 2010 to 2011 (Figure 3.4 on page 23). They increased their overall investment for both direct and indirect nutrition interventions in 2011 to US$573 million (Constant 2010 prices), although this still accounted for only 0.74% of total ODA from G8 donors. When all donors analysed in this update are considered for 2011 only, they collectively invested, on US$907.7

million in nutrition overall, US$281.3 million for direct nutrition interventions and US$626.3 million for indirect nutrition interventions (Figure 3.5 on page 23).

3.3 WHO ARE THE DONOR NUTRITION CHAMPIONS FOR THE PERIOD OF 2007 TO 2011? Of the donors analysed, those who invested the most in nutrition were (starting with the biggest): Bilateral donors: Canada, the EU, the UK, the USA and Spain (unchanged from the 2005 to 2009 period);

FIGURE 3.6: AVERAGE ODA FOR NUTRITION INTERVENTIONS FOR ALL DONORS BETWEEN 2007 AND 2011 Canada

155.2

EU institutions

129.2

UNICEF

85.6

United Kingdom

75.8

Spain

31.4

United States

24.9

IDA

24.7

Sweden

10.4

Norway

8.6

Ireland

2.7

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

FIGURE 3.7: AVERAGE ODA FOR NUTRITION INTERVENTIONS FOR G8 COUNTRIES FOR 2010 TO 2011 PERIOD Canada

180.3

EU Institutions

154.5

United Kingdom

95.2 40.9

Japan 25.0

United States 6.2

Germany

3.3

Italy 0

20

Direct Interventions

24

40

60

Indirect Interventions

80

100

120

Constant 2010 US$ (millions)

140

160

180

200


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.