1
Expert’s opinion about the concept and script of Hause of Fates, named Etz Hayim
The concept and script are the products of a long, coordinated work, several historians and experts took part in it. The structure and the vision of the exhibition is clear. I agree with it. But I don’t want to praise the concept. I concentrate only to the disputable points, where I propose some corrections, or supplement. Prelminary I sign a remarkable lack in the text of the concept. It’s evident, that there is several points in the main text of the Gallerys and of the shelf too, what must be „enlarged”, explained in detailed way, for whom having enough time for a longer visit (60 minutes or more) in the House of Fates. The visitor may be informed about the disputed or not enough known details (biographys of persons, events, storys, identification of places, etc.) by touching them in a screen. This modern technics combine the suggessive visuality of the modern museum with the „encyclopedia on the wall”. It would be important to see the references-notes together with he main texts, but they are not signed any way. Without them it’s not easy to write an expert’s opinion. As far as me, together with the corrections I propose some suplementary texts, too. In the period which is my speciality, the post-holocaust period, I will join to my opinion a paper in Hungarian. From this paper, concerning the events in Hajdunánás during the revolution of 1956, I’m ready to make a shortened version, a reference-note for the exhibition, if you agree. And now let see the texts of the Gallerys.
Supplement 1.5.
Tiszaeszlar. Blood libel in Hungary
p. 45
First of all: we need to comment the picture, like in other place, too. (Scene of the trial in Nyiregyháza, Moricz Scharf is witnessing.) And it’s important to join a reference-note to the the expression: blood libel. As a comment, it’s not enough