CHONG YI HUI 0324404 - CCDS FINAL DESIGN REPORT

CHONG YI HUI 0324404 CULTURE & COMMUNITY DESIGN STUDIO (ARC 70209)

TUTOR : AR. ALICE LIM

1.0 Site Introduction 1.1 Urban Morphology Timeline ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 4 1.2 Macro Site Analysis …..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….. 5 1.3 Micro Site Analysis …..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 2.0 Component 1 2.1 Design Statement & Individual Position ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

11

3.0 Component 2A 3.1 Precedent Studies ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 3.2 Interim Proposal ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 4.0 component 2B (Final Outcome) 4.1 Design Strategies ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

4.2 Massing Strategies ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

4.3 Site Response Strategies ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

4.4 Site Plan & Development Data ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

4.5 Floor Plans ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

4.6 Unit Layout ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

4.7 Elevation & Section …….………………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

4.8 Exploded Axonometric …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

4.9 Perspectives ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

18 19 20 21 22 35 42 47 48

5.0 Environment & Technology Component 5.1 Facade Strategy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 57 5.2 Structural Consideration ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 59 5.3 Fire Protection Strategy …….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 60 6.0 Appendix 6.1 Working Drawing ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 62

TABLE OF CONTENT

1.0 SITE INTRODUCTION

Jalan Raja Abdullah Jalan Raja Abdullah is one of many roads located in the neighbourhood of Kampung Baru in central Kuala Lumpur, and was originally known as Hale Road, named after the Collector of Land Revenue of Kuala Lumpur and Registrar of Titles for Selangor, Abraham Hale (Figure 1.0), due to his contribution in the creation of Kampung Baru.

In the 1970s, however, Hale Road became present day Jalan Raja Abdullah, aptly named after Raja Abdullah, who in the 19th century alongside his brother Raja Jumaat were instrumental in the opening of tin mines in Klang Valley, especially in Ampang. He was also responsible for bringing in 87 Chinese tin miners from Lukut, eventually laying the foundation for the establishment of Kuala Lumpur.

Abraham Hale (1854-1919) in 1907 Source: http://www.phakinee.com/finding-abraha m-hale-creator-of-john-smith/

Founded in 1899, Kampung Baru / “Kampong Baharu” is a name given by the British government at the time (Federal Malay States) to call a cluster of smaller villages that each already had their unique names. It is classified as the oldest residential area in Kuala Lumpur.

They intended for the people to be “Malay”, so as to “educate the children of Malays” to take part in the administration and enable them to reap of the present prosperity but the settlers were subjected to settlement tax and contract rules (e.g.) fines for failing to cultivate plots.

Despite the modernisation of times’ past, this village in the city has a stronghold on its historical remnants, as it can be seen through the many traditional Malay wooden houses, and also due in fact that its inhabitants refused all forms of transformation.

Key Plan NTS

1.0 SITE INTRODUCTION

1900

1927

1950-1965

Kampung Baru started off as a village; a cluster of houses in a neighbourhood context. Agriculture was prominent within the village; chilli, banana, paddy, herbs, and etc. Jalan Raja Abdullah, formerly known as Hale Road, is situated at Kampung Hujung Pasir.

Infrastructure such as tarred roads, street lighting and roadside piped water were implemented. Jalan Raja Abdullah/Hale Road was the first of the roads to receive such upgrades. Road networks appeared to be constructed according to a plan.

High-rise buildings have begun to develop on areas to the left of Kampung Baru. The settlers of Kampung Baru were given land titles, which meant that the area was to be developed and owned exclusively by the Malay ethnic group – resulting in the difficulty of “outsiders” obtaining the many plots of land for future developments.

1970

1990

2000

The massive flood of 1971 resulted in the Klang River being drastically straightened, deepened and widened, to mitigate flood occurrences.

The image of Kampung Baru worsened as this resulted in a physical separation from Jalan Ampang.

The Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations were opened to provide access and connectivity to the rest of Kuala Lumpur for both visitors and residents. Constructed underground, indicative of the 1965 settlement.

High-rise buildings have spread to nearly all areas of Kampung Baru; as if swallowing it. From a network of well-connected roads to a cluster of highways and multiple smaller roads. Situated in a congested city, Kampung Baru/Jalan Raja Abdullah is a village in a city, with redevelopment plans still up in the air.

1.1 URBAN MORPHOLOGY TIMELINE

Zoning

Key Plan (nts) The proposed site is located in between Chow Kit and Menara Kuala Lumpur. It is right below Kampung Baru and above KL City Center, right at the edge of the suburb along the Klang river.

District The Proposed site sits at the edge Kampung Baru (Residential) alongside Klang River with corporates and institutions across the river; whereas the site can be easily accessible to the commercial shops and buildings. The proposed site is accessible via Jalan Raja Abdullah and Jalan Dang Wangi. It sits above the river bank of Klang River with Dang Wangi LRT station connected on the other site. The site is also surrounded by multiple main roads and highways.

1.2 MACRO SITE ANALYSIS

Morning

Global Nodes T1

P2

Morning

Afternoon

Morning

P3

Morning

P4

Night

Bus Stop @ Jalan Dang Wangi It is less crowded compared to the LRT station and Monorail station. The number of users is constant during the weekdays, and it is used less during weekends.

Medan Tuanku Monorail station The number of users is constant during weekdays and less crowded during weekends.

Weekend

Afternoon

T4

Night

Weekday

Afternoon

Morning

Night

Afternoon

Night

T5

T2

Local Nodes

V T5

Night

T1

Nodes which public gather the most and disperse to other places

P1

Afternoon

T3

T2 T4

Where locals gather to go about their daily routines and activities

P5

Morning

P6

P7

Afternoon

Night

Morning

Weekday

T6

Back Alley @ Wilayah Complex During the day, it is used by pedestrians for shading seatings. Alleyways are turned into street food stalls.

Jalan Kamunting Office lunch and weekend crowd in due to iconic eateries and a collection of hotels in the neighbourhood.

Weekend

Afternoon

Night

T3

Morning

Afternoon

Night

T6

P8

P

P9

T

Permanent Nodes Temporary Nodes

Morning

Permanent & Transient Nodes From the site analysis, information of prominent gathering spots, of which lines or pathways intersect and branch out were gathered and mapped out diagrammatically.

Dang Wangi LRT Station The underground rapid LRT station is used mostly in the morning and evening as mode of transportation to workplaces during weekdays

Afternoon

Night

P1

P4

Morning

Afternoon

Night

P7

Night

P5

Afternoon

Night

P3

The Row (Asian Heritage Row) It is crowded mostly during weekends when youngsters usually go to eat out and attend events.

P6

Morning

Afternoon

Night

Jalan Bunus 6 Close to Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, large crowds due to textile and street food trading activities in the evening.

Morning

Afternoon

Night

P8

Jakel Mall The mall is most popular on the weekends as compared to weekdays. Additional to this, Fridays are highly dense due to weekly prayers.

Malaysian Institute of Art The institute is more active and highly populated during school hours and quiet during the weekends.

University Kuala Lumpur (UniKL) High frequency during school hours and lowest during the weekends.

Morning

1.2 MACRO SITE ANALYSIS

Afternoon

Jalan Raja Abdullah Occupied with commercial activity by day and food vending by night and constantly used by users as it is connected to major road in the weekdays and Morning Afternoon Night weekends.

Quill City Mall A popular spot that mainly attracts students and the local youth during their free time.

P2

Morning

Cap Square The centre of capsquare is well-connected with surrounding major thoroughfares, is busy during lunch break.

Morning

Afternoon

Night

P9

KL Forest Eco Park (Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve) Low crowd density in the park during weekdays and weekends due to secluded location

Morning

Afternoon

Night

Kuala Lumpur Tower The tower is a tourist attraction and usually crowded especially on weekend afternoons and during school holidays.

OPPORTUNITY -

To introduce a common dwelling ground for transient users and residential users to congregate on site Possibility of utilising the public realm as a facilitator of building programs Emphasis on eateries as the primary node Site area sufficient to accommodate a multi-functional space

STRENGTH -

1.3 MICRO SITE ANALYSIS DEMOGRAPHICS & SWOT ANALYSIS

Cultural richness as a catalyst to invite all walks of life View toward landmarks such as KL Tower and Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve Good connectivity to public transports Site is well lit and has adequate ventilation due to open side from the river

THREAT -

Site is part of an urban heat island Unsheltered walkways from heavy rain Potential of flooding Culture and identity is being threatened Potential future development caused by gentrification removes existing site experience

WEAKNESS -

Extension of business that encroaches the walkway Lack of social/green public space on site Long and narrow site Lack of proper sidewalk Privatisation of streets and back alleys disrupts service lane

ROAD SIDE STALLS

ROAD SIDE STALLS

INFORMAL SPACES

1.3 MICRO SITE ANALYSIS SITE PHOTOS

YUT KEE (TRADITIONAL FOOD)

TAPESTRY (HIPSTER CAFE)

2.0 COMPONENT 1

DESIGN STATEMENT Upon our site analysis of Jalan Raja Abdullah, Kampung Baru, there were several problems identified on-site and we are to propose a high-rise dwelling that resolves some of these issues. The proposed design idea is to cater towards the existing demographic on site which mostly consists of the youth (18-29) and working class adults (30-59). Providing a sustainable community through the act of co-living which is essential towards upholding the future of Kampung Baru. In order the reach this objective, the design proposes to accommodate multigenerational living.

Qualitative findings suggested that increased psychological flexibility and self-compassion encouraged co-living residents to be more vulnerable and trusting, which enabled communication regarding one’s needs and enhanced mutual social support and relationship quality. This, in turn, improved overall boundary management, work-life balance and well-being. Originality and value of Co-living settings – while contributing to overall sustainable development through more efficient use of space and resources – can also contribute to societal and individual sustainability. However, to ensure this contribution, the physical environment including private areas and common and semi-public areas need to be considered (Mellner, 2021).

The most common disadvantage of a highrise apartment is its ability to properly address community interaction as well as lack of green spaces for residents.

Buildings that do provide these spaces are often met with the problem of contested ownership as there are desires for more space and personal needs (Hadi, Health & Oldfield, 2018). Thus, to resolve this issue, each unit is provided with its own private garden space and community spaces (eg: breakout space, cafe, amphitheatre, laundry?) throughout the building, which reflects to how the local community live.

The idea of this design hopes to improve the current situation of Jln Raja Abdullah by bringing in the youth and working adults to create a positive change in environment, to ensure a sustainable social community and economy.

2.1 DESIGN STATEMENT & INDIVIDUAL POSITION

3.0 COMPONENT 2A

3.1 PRECEDENT STUDY HABITAT 67 (safdie architects) & TREEHOUSE (studio bo-daa)

Development begins with rectangular mass matching site with setback & regulations

Utilisation of a 9m x 9m grid allows for maximum efficiency in terms of car park and units shall be comprised from multiples of 3m

The initial stacking of units to gauge the overall high rise size for further development

Structural considerations as well as subtraction of units to create voids for additional unit spaces

A staggered mass and further addition of voids for a visually lighter form as well as placement of cores and unit types

Decentralised facilities & green decks to break up mass and have relation between co-living experience

3.2 INTERIM PROPOSAL MASSING DEVELOPMENT

TYPE A // 388 SQFT // 36 SQM 1-2 PEOPLE

TYPE C // 1356 SQFT // 126 SQM 6-8 PEOPLE

ENTRY LEVEL TYPE C // 1356 SQFT // 126 SQM 6-8 PEOPLE UPPER LEVEL TYPE B // 581 SQFT // 54 SQM 1-3 PEOPLE

3.2 INTERIM PROPOSAL UNIT TYPES

3.2 INTERIM PROPOSAL MOCK UP 3D

4.0 COMPONENT 2B (FINAL OUTCOME)

Additional Space For Unit (flexi-use) -Opportunity for additional space -Solution to contested ownership -Typology of landed housing

Hangout space

Storage area

Garden

Unit>Cluster>Community

Grid-Unit-Gap -To break away from conventional unit arrangement -Dynamic layout that encourages connectivity -Gaps provide opportunity for better natural ventilation

4.1 DESIGN STRATEGIES

Visual Connectivity

Porous Mass -Cross ventilation -Lighter looking mass -Vertical voids as open spaces

Elevate Development begins with rectangular mass matching site with setback & regulations

Grid Utilisation of a 9m x 9m grid allows for maximum efficiency of car park and units shall be comprised from multiples of 3m

Stacking The initial stacking of units to gauge the overall high rise size for further development

Structure Structural considerations as well as subtraction of units to create voids for additional unit spaces

Staggering A staggered mass and further addition of voids for a visually lighter form as well as placement of cores and unit types

Vegetation The addition of vegetation and green decks to overall mass completes intended design

Decentralised Facilities Decentralised facilities & green decks to break up mass and have relation between co-living experience

Final Massing Rooftop leisure promotes an active lifestyle while also fostering a healthy bond with the environment

4.2 MASSING DEVELOPMENT

Vehicular Access Ingress & egress directly on Jalan Raja Abdullah

Natural Ventilation Cross & stack ventilation cooling down spaces throughout building

4.3 SITE RESPONSE DIAGRAM

Pedestrian Access Formal & informal walkways in & out of site

Natural Lighting Natural light received from voids, staggering mass & green decks

Views Various view of site at various vantage points

Vegetation & Green Decks Addition of greenscapes soften building and positively impact the surrounding context

4.4 SITE PLAN & DEVELOPMENT DATA

SCALE 1:500

LEGEND CORE

VISITOR CAR PARK : 53 NOs OKU CAR PARK : 2 NOs MOTORCYCLE CAR PARK : 7 NOs

4.5 FLOOR PLANS BASEMENT 3 PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

RESIDENT CAR PARK : 46 NOs OKU CAR PARK : 2 NOs MOTORCYCLE CAR PARK : 7 NOs

4.5 FLOOR PLANS BASEMENT 2 PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE DOMESTIC TANK ROOM SECURITY ROOM

RESIDENT CAR PARK : 43 NOs OKU CAR PARK : 2 NOs MOTORCYCLE CAR PARK : 7 NOs

4.5 FLOOR PLANS BASEMENT 1 PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

FIRE ESCAPE

LOBBY & DROP-OFF

VEGETATION

PLAY AREA WARUNG WEEKEND PASAR / EVENT SPACE SERVICES TOILET

4.5 FLOOR PLANS GROUND FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

TOILET

LOBBY

FIRE ESCAPE

CAFE

SURAU

CITY LIVING ROOM CONVENIENT STORE GROCERY STORE SERVICES

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - COMMERCIAL

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

GREEN ROOF

LOBBY

SHARED SEATING / COMMUNAL SPACE

TYPE A

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE A1 TYPE B TYPE B1 TYPE C

SHARED SEATING / COMMUNAL SPACE (UNIT>CLUSTER>COMMUNITY)

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

TYPE C - UPPER

LOBBY

SHARED SEATING / COMMUNAL SPACE

TYPE A1

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE A2 TYPE A3 TYPE B2 TYPE B3

SHARED SEATING / COMMUNAL SPACE

SOCIAL LOBBY SPILL OVER ROOF SPACES > PATIO / COMMON SPACE

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

TYPE B4

LOBBY

TYPE B5

TYPE A5

TYPE B6

TYPE A2

TYPE C

TYPE A3

TYPE C1

TYPE A4

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE B3

GREEN ROOF / GARDEN

SHARED SEATING / COMMUNAL SPACE

TRANSFER STAIRS

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

GAME ROOM

LOBBY

INDOOR PLAY AREA

TYPE A2

YOGA / EXERCISE DECK

TYPE A3

SHARED SEATING / COMMUNAL SPACE

TYPE B4

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE C - UPPER

GREEN ROOF / GARDEN

TYPE C1 - UPPER

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

TYPE C2

LOBBY

GYM

TYPE A3

CO-WORK

TYPE A4

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE B4

GREEN ROOF / GARDEN

TYPE B5 TYPE B6

TRANSFER STAIRS

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

CO-WORK

LOBBY

SOCIAL LOBBY / PATIO

TYPE A

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE A2

GREEN ROOF / GARDEN

TYPE B3 TYPE B4 TYPE C2 - UPPER

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 7 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE

SOCIAL LOBBY / PATIO

LOBBY

FIRE ESCAPE

TYPE A2

GREEN ROOF / GARDEN

TYPE A3 TYPE B3 TYPE B6 TYPE B4

4.5 FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 8 FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

LEGEND CORE LOBBY WATER TANK VEGETATION

4.5 FLOOR PLANS ROOFTOP FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:350

Unit > Buffer > Public Space Green buffers are incorporated to unit and public spaces to achieve a sense of privacy

Unit > Buffer > Unit Unit to unit privacy is achieved by incorporating green buffer zones

Unit Ventilation Various openings provided in unit allows cross ventilation and cooling of indoor spaces

Open Plan Design Units are design with the idea of an open plan where the Living (L), Dining (D) and Kitchen (K) are together with the enclosed rooms such as Bedroom (B) and Toilet (T)

4.6 UNIT LAYOUT UNIT DESIGN STRATEGIES

SCALE 1:350

LEVEL 2

A

BATH

BEDROOM

BATH

A

BEDROOM

TYPE A

KITCHEN & DINING

LIVING

A

A3

KITCHEN & DINING

LIVING

A

A

LEVEL 4 A4

TYPE A3

A2

A4

TYPE A & VARIANTS

388 SQFT / 36 SQM 2 OCCUPANTS

TERRACE

TYPE A3

BATH

BEDROOM

BATH

BEDROOM KITCHEN & DINING

KITCHEN & DINING

TERRACE

TYPE A2 LIVING

TYPE A4

TYPE A2

LIVING

TYPE A4 TERRACE

4.6 UNIT TYPE UNIT TYPE A // A2 // A3 // A4 - STUDIO UNIT (388 SQFT / 36 SQM) // 2 OCCUPANTS

SCALE 1:350 SCALE 1:75

LEVEL 2

A1

KITCHEN & DINING

LIVING

A5

LEVEL 4

TYPE A1 & VARIANTS

BEDROOM BATH

388 SQFT / 36 SQM 2 OCCUPANTS

TYPE A1

KITCHEN & DINING

LIVING

BEDROOM BATH

TYPE A5 TYPE A5

4.6 UNIT TYPE UNIT TYPE A1 // A5 - STUDIO UNIT (388 SQFT / 36 SQM) // 2 OCCUPANTS

SCALE 1:350 SCALE 1:75

LEVEL 2 MASTER BEDROOM

MASTER BATH

KITCHEN & DINING

B

B

B

B

LEVEL 6 B5

BEDROOM 1

TYPE B BATH 1 LIVING

MASTER BEDROOM

BEDROOM 1

MASTER BATH

TYPE B & VARIANTS

581 SQFT / 54 SQM 3 OCCUPANTS

KITCHEN & DINING

TYPE B5 BATH 1 LIVING

TERRACE

TYPE B5

4.6 UNIT TYPE UNIT TYPE B // B5 - 2 BEDROOM UNIT (581 SQFT / 54 SQM) // 3 OCCUPANTS

SCALE 1:350 SCALE 1:75

LEVEL 2 B1

BATH 1

BEDROOM 1

KITCHEN & DINING

BATH 1

BEDROOM 1

TYPE B1

MASTER BATH MASTER BEDROOM

B3 B2

TYPE B2

MASTER BATH

LIVING

LEVEL 3

KITCHEN & DINING

LIVING

B2 B3

TERRACE

MASTER BEDROOM

TYPE B2 581 SQFT / 54 SQM 3 OCCUPANTS BATH 1

BEDROOM 1

TYPE B1 & VARIANTS

KITCHEN & DINING

TYPE B3

MASTER BATH

LIVING

MASTER BEDROOM

TERRACE

TYPE B3

4.6 UNIT TYPE UNIT TYPE B1 // B2 // B3 - 2 BEDROOM UNIT (581 SQFT / 54 SQM) // 3 OCCUPANTS

SCALE 1:350 SCALE 1:75

LEVEL 6

B6

B6

MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATH

581 SQFT / 54 SQM 3 OCCUPANTS

BATH 1

TYPE B6

BEDROOM 1

TYPE B6 LIVING

DINING

4.6 UNIT TYPE UNIT TYPE B6 - 2 BEDROOM UNIT (581 SQFT / 54 SQM) // 3 OCCUPANTS

KITCHEN

SCALE 1:350 SCALE 1:75

C1

C

C1

C

LEVEL 4

BATH 1

TYPE C & C1

TYPE C (LOWER)

(UPPER)

TERRACE

BEDROOM 1

GARDEN

C2

DINING C2

BATH 2 KITCHEN LIVING

LEVEL 6

BEDROOM 2

MASTER BATH

BATH 1

MASTER BEDROOM

BATH 1

TYPE C1

TYPE C2

(LOWER)

(LOWER)

BEDROOM 1

BEDROOM 1 DINING

DINING

KITCHEN

KITCHEN LIVING

LIVING

TERRACE

TERRACE

TYPE C & VARIANTS (LOWER)

4.6 UNIT TYPE UNIT TYPE C // C1 - FAMILY UNIT (1356 SQFT / 126 SQM) // 6 OCCUPANTS

TYPE C1

1356 SQFT / 126 SQM 6 OCCUPANTS

TYPE C & C1 (UPPER)

SCALE 1:350 SCALE 1:75

4.7 SECTION & ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION

SCALE 1:350

4.7 SECTION & ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION

SCALE 1:350

4.7 SECTION & ELEVATION SECTIONAL PERSPECTIVE

SCALE 1:350 NTS

4.7 SECTION & ELEVATION SECTIONAL PERSPECTIVE - POROSITY OF BUILDING ILLUMINATING URBAN TETRIS

SCALE 1:350 NTS

4.7 SECTION & ELEVATION SHORT SECTION & DETAILS

SCALE SCALE1:350 1:100

4.8 EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC

SCALE 1:350 NTS

4.9 PERSPECTIVES FROM LRT BRIDGE SIDE

SCALE 1:350

4.9 PERSPECTIVE FROM JALAN RAJA ABDULLAH

4.9 PERSPECTIVE - GF LOBBY / DROP-OFF AREA WARUNG @ ROADSIDE // WALKABILITY // INVITATION

GF LOBBY / DROP-OFF AREA

WARUNG @ ROADSIDE // WALKABILITY // INVITATION

4.9 PERSPECTIVE - GF PLAY AREA MULTIGENERATION USE // MINGLE // PLAY

4.9 PERSPECTIVE - LEVEL 1 CITY LIVING ROOM OPEN SPACE // HANGOUT // RELAX

4.9 PERSPECTIVE - GREEN ROOF / GARDEN TERRACE GREENSCAPE // RELIEVE // HANGOUT

4.9 PERSPECTIVE - ROOFTOP AREA RECREATION // GREENSCAPE // ESCAPE

NEW FLEXIBLE COMMUNITY HIGH-RISE LIVING

4.9 PERSPECTIVE - BIRD’S EYE VIEW

5.0 ENVIRONMENT & TECHNOLOGY COMPONENT

Sun Path & Site Shadow Analysis

Shadow casting and sun direction at 8am

Shadow casting and sun direction at 12pm

Shadow casting and sun direction at 5pm

From the sun path diagrams, the proposed site receive the most exposure on the east and west orientation. Certain design strategies are needed to be introduced to the building in order to properly handle the immense sunlight and heat transfer during day time.

The proposed solution to introduce is recessed facades of certain units and green balconies.

Vine planting was proposed as an additional form of building envelope to provide protection against the sun.

Wind Rose

5.1 FACADE STRATEGY

Wind Speed Chart

SCALE 1:350

DETAIL A

B FACADE

A

DETAIL B

5.1 FACADE STRATEGY

SCALE 1:350

A grid of 9m x 9m is utilised for maximum car park and unit design efficiency as the unit types are design to fit in the 3m division.

Final Mass

The building incorporates prefabricated reinforced concrete columns and beams, along with reinforced concrete walls and slab. The building is fully supported by the reinforced concrete columns and beams as there is no transfer slab.

Cantilever beams to support the protruded slabs.

5.2 STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATION

Two main cores (indicated in red) are located at strategic locations of the building to cater to the residents. It also acts as a support to the whole building mass. Separate fire escapes (indicated in purple) are located at various locations n levels in compliance with the by-law.

SCALE 1:350

The occupancy load is shown in the table below. The exit width is to correspond to the occupancy load per floor and shall comply with the requirement according to the 7th schedule in the By-Laws. Based on the calculations, the minimum exit width is 0.55m and the total staircase width provided is 9.3m, thus being in compliance to the aforementioned by-law.

1.

Occupancy Load (3rd floor)

According to the 7th schedule, occupants load for Purpose group III. Other Residential/Flat = 24/m² Occupancy Load per floor = total net area/24 = 612m²/24m² per pax = 25.5 = 26 pax

2. Units of horizontal exit width According to the 7th schedule, capacity exit for Purpose group III. Other Residential/Flat = 60 per unit Unit of exit width required = 26/60 = 0.76 = 1 unit

5.3 FIRE PROTECTION STRATEGY & OCCUPANCY LOAD

In this building, automatic sprinkler system is introduced. According to 7th Schedule for Purpose Group III, it falls under “other residential” section which 10m dead end limit and 45m travel distance is required. All unit layout configuration comply within the maximum travel distance. Due to the design of staircase and lobby area are providing with permanent natural ventilation as open design, protected lobbies may be omitted which abides to UBBL By-law 197(protected lobbies). Emergency light is provided along the corridor and staircase; hose reel and dry powder.

3. Minimum required exit width = 1 x 550 = 550mm = 0.55m 4. Exit width provided = staircase 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 3.0m + 2.1m + 2.1m + 2.1m = 9.3m (>0.55m)

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350

6.0 APPENDIX 6.1 WORKING DRAWING

SCALE 1:350