AEC Magazine May / June 2023

IMAGE: AUTODESK FORMA

Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology for Architecture, Engineering and Construction

BIM 2.0

May / June 2023 >> Vol.126 p01_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Cover FINAL.indd 1

20 & Lo J21 nd unJu Lon e n2e

on 1/ do 22 n

Defining the future of AEC design technology

March / April 2023 >> Vol.125

30/05/2023 12:40

STAY FOCUSED, DESIGN MORE. With powerful improvements to automated design, documentation, and collaboration workflows, and professional out-of-the-box visualization solutions, Archicad 26 lets you focus on what you do best: design great buildings.

Archicad 26 introduces faster, more accurate documentation with fewer manual workarounds thanks to powerful enhancements to the documentation workflow.

Learn more on graphisoft.com

Szervita Square Building DVM Group, dvmgroup.com, Hungary

Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology for Architecture, Engineering and Construction

editorial

MANAGING EDITOR GREG CORKE greg@x3dmedia.com

CONSULTING EDITOR MARTYN DAY

26

martyn@x3dmedia.com

CONSULTING EDITOR STEPHEN HOLMES stephen@x3dmedia.com

advertising

GROUP MEDIA DIRECTOR TONY BAKSH tony@x3dmedia.com

ADVERTISING MANAGER STEVE KING steve@x3dmedia.com

U.S. SALES & MARKETING DIRECTOR DENISE GREAVES denise@x3dmedia.com

Defining BIM 2.0 12 With proprietary file formats, subscription, third-party ecosystems and industry standards, what happens when disruptive technology arrives?

subscriptions

MANAGER ALAN CLEVELAND alan@x3dmedia.com accounts

CHARLOTTE TAIBI charlotte@x3dmedia.com

FINANCIAL CONTROLLER SAMANTHA TODESCATO-RUTLAND sam@chalfen.com AEC Magazine is available FREE to qualifying individuals. To ensure you receive your regular copy please register online at www.aecmag.com about AEC Magazine is published bi-monthly by X3DMedia Ltd 19 Leyden Street London, E1 7LE UK T. +44 (0)20 3355 7310 F. +44 (0)20 3355 7319 © 2023 X3DMedia Ltd

2023: a pivotal year for AEC tech …again 26 While construction struggles to achieve the same advancements in productivity from technology as other sectors, there remains tremendous potential for change

Autodesk Forma - a deep dive into the data lake 18 Grand Central 28 Autodesk’s AEC cloud platform has arrived with an initial focus on conceptual design. But Forma will become much more than this. We explore how it handles data

The scale and complexity of Minnucci Associates’ Central Station project gives a compelling glimpse into the future of facilities management

Can FIM solve the ‘modular question’? 24

NXT BLD and NXT DEV conference preview 30

It’s time for a unified platform that supports the interests and activities of all stakeholders in a construction project, and where design and fabrication are linked

On 20-21 June in London, AEC Magazine’s thought provoking conferences will give a glimpse into the future of AEC technology and software development

Workstation special report

All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without prior permission from the publisher is prohibited. All trademarks acknowledged. Opinions expressed in articles are those of the author and not of X3DMedia. X3DMedia cannot accept responsibility for errors in articles or advertisements within the magazine.

FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS

Register your details to ensure you get a regular copy register.aecmag.com

www.AECmag.com

p03_AEC_JANFEB23_Contents.indd 3

Battle of the desktop workstation CPUs: Intel ‘Sapphire Rapids’ vs AMD Threadripper Pro • Lenovo ThinkStation P7 / PX reviews • Cloud workstations for CAD, BIM and viz - how the major public cloud

providers stack up • Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Gen GPU review • AMD Radeon Pro W7800 / W7900 GPU preview • Reimagining the desktop workstation as a remote resource • Sustainable cloud workstations May / June 2023

3

31/05/2023 13:38

20 June 2023 THE FUTURE OF of AEC technology (Conference & exhibition - QEII Centre, London)

TIM FU - ZHA

TIM FU - ZHA

www.nxtbld.com

• Key topics: AI design, Metaverse, next-gen BIM tools, DfMA, BIM workflows, sustainability, robotics, reality capture, geoBIM, construction, mixed reality, building performance, workstations and lots more

• ‘AI in AEC: current and future opportunities • Workflow challenges and solutions at leading AEC firms, including BIG, HOK, Foster + Partners, Arup, Zaha Hadid Architects, Herzog & de Meuron and more

GOLD SPONSORS

SILVER SPONSORS

Bricsys

NXT BLD NXT DEV COMBO V2.indd 2

31/05/2023 16:22

SPECIAL OFFER

Two day N XT BLD & NXT DEV co mbo ticket only £9 9 (use code 99 BLD)

21 June 2023 THE FUTURE OF AEC software development (Conference & exhibition - QEII Centre, London)

www.nxtdev.build

• ‘BIM 2.0’ - the future of AEC software

• AEC technology market trends

• What do AEC firms want from tech?

• How to meet future sustainability goals

• How will AI impact AEC?

• Founder stories - from startup to sale

• The future of offsite design & construction

• VCs - hear from those funding AEC tech

GOLD SPONSORS

SILVER SPONSORS

NXT BLD NXT DEV COMBO V2.indd 3

31/05/2023 16:22

News

Faro Hybrid Reality Capture to boost scanning speed

aro Technologies has released ‘Hybrid Reality Capture’, a new technology designed to combine the accuracy of the Faro Focus Premium Laser Scanner with the speed of a panoramic camera. According to Faro, it allows users to complete up to two weeks of on-site work in just one week.

Hybrid Reality Capture is a new scan mode for users of Faro’s Focus Premium Laser Scanners. Powered by Flash technology, it combines ‘fast scans’ with colourised 360° images.

According to Faro, Flash Technology will enable more frequent, faster data capture, requiring only 30 seconds per scan. The company explains that by using proprietary smart upscaling algorithms,

F

the output includes all collected images and points captured by a Ricoh Theta Z1 360° camera and Focus Premium Laser Scanner, resulting in full-colour scans that look more crisp than the same resolution scans with traditional methods.

Matthew Davies, senior account manager at Faro, posted a video on LinkedIn that shows a scan he captured in 12 mins 51 secs using the new Flash Technology (www.tinyurl.com/Faro-Hybrid).

It comprises 15 scans and includes a 3.5-minute calibration scan in full colour, plus tripod moves. Processing, registration and project point cloud creation took another 30 minutes 38 seconds, he writes.

■ www.faro.com

Allplan 2023-1 focuses on design and build llplan 2023-1 offers several new features that support more efficient design to build workflows across AEC, according to Allplan’s Eduardo Lazzarotto.

For architects, there is a big emphasis on visualisation, with new integrated GPUaccelerated visualisation tools based on Redshift from Maxon and a Technical Preview of the Twinmotion Direct Link.

For model quality management, ‘Solibri Inside’ allows designers to perform checks and identify errors from within the BIM Explorer in Allplan.

For engineering, the integration of the

A

6

May / June 2023

p06_08_09_10_AEC_MAYJUNE23_News-MacBook Pro (2).indd 6

Asite acquires 3D Repo site, a data platform for the built environment used by firms including Laing O’Rourke, and Transport for London (TfL), has acquired 3D Repo, a specialist in ‘real-time’ cloud-based BIM collaboration software for construction and infrastructure projects.

The acquisition builds on a relationship that dates back to 2020, when the two firms started working together to integrate their cloud-based collaboration platforms.

3D Repo is best known for its 3D visualisation, safety, and data validation tools. Multidisciplinary teams can communicate and access live BIM data directly through a web browser. Users can manage model revisions and highlight potential issues using live collaboration tools, which allow the whole project team to work from a single source of truth.

Asite’s project information management solution is more centred on the sharing of documents through traditional review, markup and revision tracking workflows.

A

■ www.asite.com ■ www.3drepo.com

SiteScape offers scan-to-BIM service iteScape, the LiDAR

scanner iPad/ S 3D iPhone Pro app for

Schöck catalog provides access to the latest installation parts. Users of Allplan Bridge 2023 are now able to synchronise analytical models over the Allplan Cloud (via Bimplus) with Lusas FEA software.

Further to Allplan’s quantity take-off functionality, there is now an Allplan cloud-based solution to ‘conveniently generate’ quantity take-off information, say on-site. Allplan users can now extract the quantities contained in a BIM model in Bimplus, for example, to estimate the materials needed for different construction phases.

architects and contractors, has introduced a new ‘Order BIM’ service that transforms SiteScape 3D scans into BIM models. Customers receive ‘editable, design-ready’ files in Revit or IFC format in as little as one business day.

SiteScape has also introduced Photo Annotations, a feature for capturing rich details, mapped to the correct location within scans.

■ www.allplan.com

■ www.sitescape.ai

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 13:53

Enscape 3.5 Out Now

Your Next Visualization Asset Enscape is a real-time visualization and VR plugin that gives you top-quality renderings and the fastest and easiest way to produce them. Unlike other visualization tools, it’s a plugin, not a standalone application which means you keep visualization efforts within your native building modeling platform and work from a single source of truth.

Adjustable assets: Over 1,000 assets

with variants and assets that allow

color and material customization.

Improved mirror reflections: Shading quality

improvements for mirror reflections.

Improved indirect lighting:

3D asset package:

Quality of lighting

people assets in

improvements for interior scenes.

Over 90 unique

the Enscape Asset Library.

Scan the QR code or visit

www.enscape3d.com to get

your free 14-day trial.

AEC Magazine May-Jun 1-Page Advert - 2.indd 1

25.5.2023 г. 14:35:48

NavVis VLX 3 wearable mobile mapper promises enhanced coverage at distance avVis has launched the NavVis VLX 3, the latest version of its wearable mobile mapping device, designed to capture indoor and outdoor environments with high detail.

The all-in-one device captures 3D measurements at walking pace with two new 32-layer LiDAR sensors in combination with SLAM software to deliver what the company describes as ‘industry-leading’ point cloud quality.

According to NavVis, the new LiDAR sensors generate twice the amount of data at range, with 1.2 million points per second, and increased vertical field of view, optimising the level of detail that can be extracted from the point cloud, improving modelling accuracy and precision. The SLAM algorithm has been enhanced to perform ‘even better outdoors’ and capture the facades of buildings at range.

“If you just look at the coverage at distance, it is truly on a completely different level,” said Dr Georg Schroth, CTO and co-founder, NavVis. “The VLX 3 will not only show details in more clarity, it will also feature an improved absolute accuracy with further reduced drift – for instance, when you scan long road sections.

N

“From scanning civil construction work like roads and bridges to topographic surveys, the VLX 3 is going to be the new cornerstone tool that you will bring and use in any kind of project.”

Meanwhile, four cameras positioned on top of the device take high-resolution, sharp images in every direction for a complete 360º image — all without the operator appearing in the field of view.

Thanks to software updates, both the NavVis VLX 3 and NavVis VLX 2 (with

its original cameras) feature an improved panoramic resolution, so users will be able to read text and other details like cracks in more clarity.

For scanning feedback, users can monitor scanning progress in real time with a built-in touchscreen.

Other features include ‘highly realistic texturing’ and the ability to automatically detect and remove dynamic objects from point clouds during post-processing.

■ www.navvis.com

EvolveLAB launches Veras for AI visualisation in Rhino eras, the AI-powered visualisation tool from EvolveLAB, is now available for Rhino as well as Revit and SketchUp. According to the company, the Veras add-in uses 3D model geometry directly within your CAD/BIM tools as a ‘substrate for creativity and inspiration’.

Using AI algorithms, users can generate

V

multiple design options ‘in seconds’.

Features include AI text prompt-based image creation and generative design.

EvolveLAB offers several other apps, including Helix for converting SketchUp, AutoCAD, and Rhino models to native Revit components and Morphis, a co-authoring generative design tool.

■ www.evolvelab-inc.com

Revizto launches new iOS and Android phone app evizto has launched a new phone app designed to allow its users to access, manage, and collaborate on construction and infrastructure projects.

The Revizto phone app is available for iOS and Android, works online and offline, and is included with any Revizto licence.

R

8

May / June 2023

p06_08_09_10_AEC_MAYJUNE23_News-MacBook Pro (2).indd 8

For ‘project management on the go’ the Revizto phone app is designed to give users full access to all design and construction data, including 3D models, drawings, point clouds, and more. Real-time collaboration is also supported, delivering what Revizto

describes as seamless communication between teams with swift issue tracking.

With the app, Revizto is also expecting broader usage among teams and stakeholders, helping to bridge the gap between different disciplines and fostering a more collaborative and productive working environment.

■ www.revizto.com

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 13:53

News

Enscape 3.5 adds adjustable assets and boosts lighting

Simplebim 10 tackles BIM data wrangling

and colours of 100 furniture items and accessories, as well as one article of clothing for 40 human assets. Over 91 vehicles can also be customised using a colour palette or via a HEX code.

Enscape 3.5 also marks the debut of a new global illumination algorithm, which is designed to provide improved lighting, reflections and rendering quality to users with GPUs built for ray-tracing, such as the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada (see page WS24)

implebim has released version 10 of its BIM data wrangling software which is used by construction firms, BIM managers, architects, and structural and design engineers.

According to the company, the latest release opens up new ways to use data in IFC files to enable better production planning and scheduling, cost estimation, procurement, installation work, tendering, monitoring, and other downstream processes. Users can derive objects and data from original models, automatically creating new derived objects based on quantities, object clashes, and existing geometry.

“Simplebim 10 will revolutionise BIM data wrangling,” said Simplebim’s Sakari Lehtinen.

“Once data is standardised and enriched in a centralised and automated way, it can be used by everyone in the construction chain for better decision-making.”

■ www.enscape3d.com

■ www.simplebim.com

S

nscape 3.5, the latest release of the real-time visualisation tool for users of Revit, SketchUp, Archicad, Rhino and Vectorworks, now includes adjustable assets, multibounce global illumination (GI) and over 40 digital humans.

Adjustable Assets allows designers to customise materials, colours and an initial batch of entourage, making it easier to create a specific feeling for their 3D scenes. Users can adjust the materials

E

Spaces embraces multi-core processing paces, the AEC-focused sketchbased conceptual design tool, can now harness the power of multiple cores on the Apple iPad. According to Spaces, this has two benefits. First, specific tasks can be split into multiple pieces and performed in parallel. Second, many tasks can now run in the background, so users can continue

S

to explore their ideas without waiting.

Background parallel processing is used for a new Sketch Recognition Engine to automate and improve the overall quality of Spaces models. For example, it can compare each stroke drawn to existing strokes and model items to snap the stroke parallel or perpendicular.

RIB launches free carbon quantifier tool

he Brief is a new urban design tool for the iPad, created for planners, architects and developers. The software is designed specifically for the early stages of urban design and features procedural generation for fast city prototyping and design data evaluation.

IB Software has partnered with nonprofit organisation, Building Transparency, to develop the RIB Carbon Quantifier.

Through a direct link with Building Transparency’s freeto-use Embodied Carbon in Construction Calculator (EC3), the application allows users to ‘quickly, easily and consistently’ allocate carbon environmental product declaration (EPD) values against their imported estimate data, including resource quantities.

■ www.thebrief.space

■ www.rib-software.com

■ www.spacesapp.io

‘The Brief’ urban design tool launches T

www.AECmag.com

p06_08_09_10_AEC_MAYJUNE23_News-MacBook Pro (2).indd 9

R

May / June 2023

9

30/05/2023 13:53

News

ROUND UP Blockchain for IFC

TwinUp unveils AI-driven software for architects

Hong Kong firm Arcartera is looking to bring greater transparency and security to the construction process with a new Blockchain BIM solution that automatically creates a public ledger of a building construction status by minting an NFT for an .IFC file ■ www.arcartera.com

ResponsibleSteel Trimble has joined ResponsibleSteel, a non-profit organisation designed to drive the production of net-zero steel.

Trimble Tekla’s Embodied Carbon Calculator enables designers to assess the potential environmental implications of steelwork designs ■ www.responsiblesteel.org

OpenSpace 360 OpenSpace has added several new features to its 360° reality capture and AI-powered analytics solution.

An enhanced mobile app includes BIM Compare, allowing teams on site to view their model side-by-side with actual site conditions ■ www.openspace.ai

Urban planning tool British tech startup Yeme Tech has launched a new Community Data Platform (CDP) that helps planners and developers ‘instantly identify’ social infrastructure, facilities, and community spaces which are missing from British neighbourhoods. Yeme Tech is a partner of Esri UK ■ www.yemetech.com

Building products A new report from specification and construction product information platform, NBS, reveals that just under half (43%) of construction professionals say it isn’t easy to find comprehensive detail about the safety performance and sustainability of building products. The ‘What Specifiers Want’ report can be downloaded free from the link below ■ www.tinyurl.com/NBS-specifiers

Verifi3D / Dropbox Verifi3D, a tool for validating BIM models and reporting issues, is now integrated with Dropbox. The integration allows users to ‘seamlessly’ sync and access their models (.rvt and IFC files) between Verifi3D and Dropbox, all in a browser ■ https://verifi3d.xinaps.com

10

May / June 2023

p06_08_09_10_AEC_MAYJUNE23_News-MacBook Pro (2).indd 10

winUp is a new AI-driven

groups and the larger architectural

software tool for community at their choosing.

T architectural creating, managing, optimising, TwinUp Building is a 3D digital twin and presenting 3D design models and project images.

The platform, currently in beta, is powered by ‘Arch-e’, an AI personal assistant that processes data in real-time to ‘transform design from beginning to end.’

There are three integrated TwinUp apps: ‘Community’, ‘Building’ and ‘World’.

TwinUp Community is a free virtual design portfolio and social media platform just for architects. Users upload, enhance, organise, and share images and videos of their design work with private

maker app that helps architects convert their 3D models (BIM, et. al.) into what TwinUp describes as digital twin models.

TwinUp Building’s visualisation features and simulation capabilities allow users to render, analyse, optimise, present, and share their models with peers and clients.

TwinUp World is a 3D virtual digital twin model of the Earth whereupon users can place their 3D models for analysis, enhancement, rendering, and presentation in their proper local site context.

■ www.twinup.co

Interoperability code of practice launches he UK Government & Industry Interoperability Group (GIIG) has published a new code of practice to better support interoperability in the built environment.

‘Delivering Valuable Data: An interoperability code of practice for technologies’ identifies six principles which should be delivered by industry software: the first is interoperability; the five

T

underpinning principles are: longevity; security; information ownership; information value and competition.

For each of the principles the code of practice has identified technical requirements which make performance against the code measurable. Technology providers can take these requirements into consideration when developing products.

■ www.ukbimframework.org/giig

Atvero launches CMap integration tvero, the document and drawing management solution for architects and engineers, is now integrated with CMap, the CRM,

A

project and resource management software. The move follows CMap’s acquisition of Atvero earlier this year.

■ www.atvero.com

■ www.cmap-software.com

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 13:53

g n i n fi e D

BIM 2.0

Over decades, the BIM software industry has refined the process of continual development and evolution of the various competing tools. With proprietary file formats, subscription, third-party ecosystems and industry standards, what happens when disruptive technology arrives? Martyn Day explains

66

million years ago, the Earth was hit by a 10km wide asteroid, the Chicxulub impactor, which landed in the Yucatán Peninsula.

Humans were blissfully unaware of what came before us until 1842, when British scientist Richard Owen announced his theory on Dinosaurs.

Likewise, I often get the feeling that many in our industry don’t know what came before today’s BIM systems, other than 2D drawings and AutoCAD. In the 1980s, there were previous generations of BIM tools, before the definition and common usage of building information modelling. Considering the compute power available at the time, it really was incredible what Sonata, RUCAPS and GDS were able to do in 2.5D and 3D. However, the multiple asteroids of cost, desktop computing and the ubiquity of cheap 2D CAD quickly turned them into 12

May / June 2023

p12_13_14_16_AEC_MAYJUNE23_BIM20.indd 12

fossils, to be mainly forgotten.

While the creators of some of the previous crop of AEC tools were trying to adapt and survive in the new desktop world, Dr. Jonathan Ingram, creator of the UNIX-based Sonata (at over £100k per seat) was in the process of developing a desktop version, called Reflex but sold out to PTC before widespread commercialisation. This early BIM technology inspired Graphisoft in Hungary and was eventually spun out of PTC and served as the root of Revit.

History repeats. The software industry goes through cycles where success can come from evolution and widespread adoption, only for something disruptive to come along and change the game. In the 1980s mechanical design software world, there were many Unix based design tools, such as CADDS and MEDUSA from Computervision, which had to develop the hardware and the

software. Then along came a software company called PTC which developed a parametric modelling tool on the relatively low-cost Sun workstation and PTC eventually put the original pioneers out of business.

In time, Solidworks came along on the Windows PC and almost did to PTC what PTC had done to Computervision.

These cycles happen rarely, perhaps every two or three decades, as dominant players stagnate, and new blood enters the market.

The cloud Looking at the crop of new software that AEC Magazine has covered over the past eighteen months, it’s clear to me that something similar is happening, with a number of technologies and ideas solidifying around fresh approaches.

In past conversations with CEOs of design software, many have identified www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 12:35

Cover story

the shift from desktop applications to cloud applications as being the most likely asteroid to shake up the market – and, based on that, Autodesk is aiming to disrupt itself with Forma (see page 18), before any other player does.

From my point of view, one of the key reasons why Revit was not rewritten ten years ago was because Autodesk believed that it was moving to the cloud and, therefore, until the base cloud platform had been built, there was no point in re-writing a successful product. But the process of developing that technology took longer than expected.

The delay has opened a chink in the company’s armour, with a handful of cloudbased startups hoping to deliver ‘a faster horse’ and a more collaborative experience.

Get used to hearing about tools that want to be the Figma of BIM. (N.B. Figma is a collaborative web application for interface design - www.figma.com). We currently have Arcol and Snaptrude vying for this posiwww.AECmag.com

The BIM 2.0 wish list What we think should be in next generation AEC oftware tools • Integration with other technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and the Internet of Things (IoT) to enable more sophisticated analysis, optimisation, and automation of building design, documentation and operation.

• Enhanced collaboration and data sharing capabilities,

including improved interoperability between different software applications and open data standards.

more immersive and interactive design experiences, bring BIM to the world of Meta.

• Greater emphasis on sustainability, resilience, and lifecycle analysis, allowing designers and builders to create more environmentally friendly and resilient buildings.

• Integration with blockchain or other distributed ledger/ encryption technologies to enable more secure and transparent data sharing and collaboration.

• Advanced visualisation and simulation capabilities, including augmented reality and virtual reality technologies that enable

• Integrating Desktop and Cloud to seamlessly connect project participants and provide new SaaS business models.

May / June 2023

13

Cover story

Snaptrude includes a bi-directional link with Revit to enable users to ‘seamlessly transfer’ models between the tools

tion, with others in the wings.

However, the cloud, as a pure market disruptor, doesn’t necessarily seem to be enough to change customers’ workflows today; the increasing power of the desktop and the need for powerful GPUs is still seen as a key resource for today’s AEC designers. Very few cloud-based applications utilise cloud-based GPUs as they are expensive and typical virtual machines used in AWS and other public clouds are not workstation class, so you still need a decent local computer. And, as shown in the in-depth article on page WS30 of our Workstation Special report, cloud workstations play second fiddle to personal workstations when it comes to performance.

There is also a chance that customers might not want to use a pure play cloud BIM application. Graphisoft, the developer of Archicad, has gone for a hybrid approach to cloud, letting customers choose to keep their project data local or on their BIMcloud Software as-a-Service (SaaS) platform. The company has even gone so far as to enable analysis applications to run locally or in the cloud.

Graphisoft has taken this approach as it has concerns over browser security and in response to customers’ appreciation of local hardware and being in control. If Autodesk, with Forma, gets this complex migration to the cloud wrong, Graphisoft will have a USP for its cloud oblivious BIM architecture.

Artificial Intelligence Cloud is not the only disruptor. While there is a lot of news about artificial intelligence and machine learning, and everybody’s excited about AI image generator Midjourney and the ability for ChatGPT to write your CV or make some in depth recommendations about the best Korean 14

May / June 2023

p12_13_14_16_AEC_MAYJUNE23_BIM20.indd 14

dramas on Netflix, the real disruption Data has only just started.

The AEC industry has long been trapped Augmenta (www.tinyurl.com/augmenta-aec) in silos, unaided by the proprietary file and Swapp (www.tinyurl.com/swapp-aec) formats of the vendors. As the industry have demonstrated the kinds of capabili- moves to a more cloud-centric approach, ties that AI can bring to AEC. files will wane, and project data will be Augmenta automatically routes sys- stored in ‘data lakes’. This will make coltems like electrical, plumbing and MEP laboration much easier. Instead of shuntin a Revit model, while Swapp will take ing huge files through document mana sketch of defined spaces and build a agement systems, subsets of models and detailed 3D model together with all systems of components will be able to be drawings in the time it takes have shared dynamically. lunch. This is not just taking hours off While customers and some vendors project time but weeks and months. have made big strides in talking about I would say we’re only and utilising open data years away from having formats, even big players fully automated and like Autodesk says its Should an early checked 2D drawing outcommitted to the liberaliput. This single phase of a adopter be able to sation of project data project - the creation of remove the time through open APIs. There documentation - costs the is, of course, no reason and cost of just AEC industry hundreds why a project data lake producing of millions of dollars per needs to be stored on a year. The first software vendor’s public cloud. drawings, that company to deliver a customer-focused advantage could Truly reliable automated vendors will offer capabilbe used in fee workflow will make an ities both in public and reduction, or absolute killing. behind your firewall, and The automation of will submit their data lake taking on more design modelling and docformat to open source. jobs with a umentation will certainly smaller team Fabrication be a sizable asteroid hitting the market. While We are facing a demothis might impact jobs, graphic time bomb at a and take away the drudgery of document time when we have a huge demand for preparation, it will even hit software new builds. The construction industry firms whose sales of millions of subscrip- has been trying and mainly failing at settions of drawing tools may reduce to a ting up offsite construction facilities, to trickle. And because software firms don’t mass manufacture volumetric buildings like to go backwards in revenue genera- and ship them to site. tion, expect to see new business models None of the current generation BIM emerge to make up for this lack of seat tools were ever intended to interface to or sales. I predict we will see more compa- drive digital fabrication. Then there’s the nies charging by the value of the project, small problem that architects have never or as a percentage of fees charged. been trained to design for manufacture.

‘‘

’’

www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 12:35

Finally found the ‘Amazon’ for CAD plugins …

CADSOMA | CAD Solution Marketplace Become a reseller now · cadsoma.com

Cover story

1 Augmenta and 2 Swapp have demonstrated the kinds of capabilities that AI can bring to AEC. Augmenta automatically routes systems like electrical, plumbing and MEP in a Revit model, while Swapp will take a sketch of defined spaces and build a detailed 3D model together with all drawings in the time it takes have lunch.

While the new generation of BIM tools are embryonic, the developers are all aware that they must cross the divide between architecture and construction.

Other tech With looming sustainability targets, designers and construction firms will be forced to truly understand how sustainable their designs are and clients will not be able to dismiss sustainable elements to save on costs. The ubiquity of sensors will also eventually mean that data from the real world can be combined with the BIM model, further driving better understanding of performance, with real-world metrics. Next-generation tools need to be fluent in aiding the design of sustainable buildings and infrastructure.

Conclusion The acceleration of design technology development is clearly happening. With the introduction of new competitors, new foundation technologies and market leading firms such as Autodesk aiming to disrupt themselves by moving to a cloud-

1

2

16

May / June 2023

centric solution, we are in new territory.

Historically as we have moved through different ages of design software, market leaders and their proprietary formats have managed to lock in and damage open interoperability. We got ‘DWGd’ and ‘RVTd’. With this next generation of tools and a verbal commitment to open data, BIM 2.0 looks like it’s starting off on the right foot this time.

The most disruptive and intriguing part of this technology mix will be what AI does to the industry. Should an early adopter be able to remove the time and cost of just producing drawings, that advantage could be used in fee reduction, or taking on more jobs with a smaller team.

The competitive disadvantage to other firms staying with the current generation of manual tools would be incredibly significant. Therefore, I conclude that technologies which enable this, once proven, will spread like wildfire through the world’s design firms.

BIM 2.0 and what the industry wants from next gen AEC software are key topics for discussion at our NXT BLD (www. nxtbld.com) and NXT DEV (www.nxtdev. build) conferences at the Queen Elizabeth II Centre in London on 20-21 June.

At NXT BLD (20 June) be sure to come and hear what Greg Schleusner, Director of Design Technology, Innovation at HOK will be saying about data lakes and taking back control of BIM data. The day also features Adi Shavit the CEO of SWAPP a company that aims to automate much of the design and drawing phases in BIM. Finch3D will be talking AI in architectural design and Senthil Kumar of Slate Technologies will give us his impression of AI’s impact in construction.

At NXT DEV (21 June) we will seek to define what BIM 2.0 is and have a series of panel sessions / town hall debates, where we can discuss exactly how the software technology landscape needs to change to better serve the process of designing and constructing the built environment.

The audience will combine practicing AEC firms with technologists, developers and venture capitalists. Please come and join the debate, so the industry can inform those creating the next generation of tools, where the pain points and holes in tech stacks are - and what the industry needs next.

NXT DEV will also be an opportunity to meet the founders and see the coolest application developers we have covered over the last year in AEC Magazine — Qonic, Hypar, Augmenta, SWAPP, Finch3D, Arcol, Snaptrude and others. www.AECmag.com

It’s here!

cadsoma.com Find the right CAD application for your workflow

We offer you the platform – you do the business.

Publish your plugins in the CAD Solution Marketplace and start selling!

CADSOMA iOS app

Autodesk Forma

a deep dive into the data lake Autodesk boldly told the industry that there would be no second-generation Revit. Instead, it would develop a cloud-based platform for all project data, called Forma. This month the first instalment arrived, with a focus on conceptual design. But Forma will become so much more than this.

Martyn Day gets to the heart of the platform and how it handles data

I

n early May, Autodesk announced guess, a lot of the software development the first instalment of its next-gen- world), decided that the cloud with a eration cloud-based platform, Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) business Forma, with an initial focus on con- model was going to be the future of comceptual design (see box out on page 21). The puting.

Desktop-based applications branding and original announcement of require local computing power, create files, Forma was delivered at Autodesk caches and generate duplicates. All of this University 2022 in New requires management Orleans. While the and dooms collaboraname was new, the contion to be highly linear.

While the initial cept was not.

The benefits of havBack in 2016, the then instalment of Forma ing customers’ data and vice president of prodapplications sat on could be considered the uct development at a single server include to be just a Autodesk, Amal seamless data sharing conceptual design Hanspal, announced and access to huge Project Quantum (www. tool — essentially a amounts of compute tinyurl.com/quantum-aec), power. Flimsy files are reworking and the development of a replaced by extensible merging of the cloud-based replaceand robust databases, ment for Autodesk’s allowing simultaneous acquired desktop AEC tools.

Spacemaker toolset delivery of data In the seven years that amongst project teams. with Autodesk followed, progress has With the potential for Formit — this been slow, but developcustomers to reduce ment has continued, capital expenditure on launch should not going through several and easy be seen as anything hardware project names, including management of software other than one of Plasma (www.tinyurl.com/ deployment and supthe most significant port, it’s a utopia based plasma-aec), and project teams. While the initial on modern computer milestones in the instalment of Forma science and is eminently company’s AEC could be considered to be feasible. However, to software history just a conceptual design move an entire install tool — essentially a base of millions from a reworking and merging desktop infrastructure, of the acquired Spacemaker toolset with with trusted brands, to one that is cloudAutodesk Formit — this launch should based, does not come without its risks. not be seen as anything other than one of This would be the software equivalent of the most significant milestones in the changing a tyre at 90 miles an hour. company’s AEC software history.

The arrival of Forma, as a product, Since the early 2000s, Autodesk (and, I means that Autodesk has officially started

‘‘

’’

18

May / June 2023

that process and, over time, both new functionality and existing desktop capabilities will be added to the platform. Overall, this could take five to ten years to complete.

The gap Autodesk’s experiments with developing cloud-based design applications have mainly been in the field of mechanical CAD, with Autodesk Fusion in 2009.

While the company has invested heavily in cloud-based document management, with services such as Autodesk Construction Cloud, this doesn’t compare to the complexity of creating an actual geometry modelling solution. To create Fusion, Autodesk spent a lot of time and money to come up with a competitive product to Dassault Systèmes’ Solidworks, which is desktop-based. The thinking was that by getting ahead on the inevitable platform change to cloud, Autodesk would have a contender to capture the market. This has happened many times before, with UNIX to DOS and DOS to Windows.

Despite these efforts Fusion has failed to further Autodesk’s penetration of its competitors’ install base. At the same time the former founder of Solidworks, Jon Hirschtick, also developed a cloudbased competitor, called Onshape, which was ultimately sold to PTC. While this proved that the industry still thought that cloud would, at some point, be a major platform change, it was clear that customers were both not ready for a cloud-based future or to leave the current market-leading application.

Years later and all Solidworks’ competitors are still sat there waiting for the dam to burst. Stickiness, loyalty and www.AECmag.com

Feature

Forma connects all of Autodesk’s existing products through a unified data environment, via connectors and data from other vendors’ applications, including McNeel Rhino

long-honed skills could mean they will be waiting a long time.

This reticence to move is even more likely to be found in the more fragmented and workflow-constrained AEC sector.

On one hand, the pressure to develop and deliver this over ten years would seem quite acceptable. The problem comes with Autodesk’s desktop products that have had a historic low development velocity and a growing vocal and frustrated user base.

Back in 2012, I remember having conversations with C-level Autodeskers, comparing the cloud development in Autodesk’s manufacturing division and wondering when the same technologies would be available for a ‘next-generation’ Revit. With this inherent vision that the cloud would be the next ‘platform’, new generations of desktop tools like Revit, seemed like a waste of resources.

Furthermore, Autodesk was hardly under any pressure from competitors to go down this route.

However, I suspect that not many developers at the time would have conceived that it would take so long for Autodesk to create the underlying technologies for a cloud-based design tool. The idea that Revit, in its current desktopbased state, could survive another five to ten years before being completely rewritten for the cloud is, to me, inconceivable.

Angry customers have made their voices clearly heard (e.g. Autodesk Open Letter (www.tinyurl.com/OLG-AEC) and Nordic Open Letter Group (tinyurl.com/ Nordic-AEC). So, while Forma is being prepared, the Revit development team will need to do a serious bit of rear-guard action development to keep customers www.AECmag.com

pXX_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Forma.indd 19

happy in their continued investment in Autodesk’s aging BIM tool. And money spent on shoring up the old code and adding new capabilities is money that’s not being spent on the next generation.

This isn’t just a case of providing enhancements for subscription money paid. For the first time in many decades, competitive software companies have started developing cloud-based BIM tools to go head-to-head with Revit (see Arcol (www.tinyurl.com/arcol-AEC), Snaptrude (www.tinyurl.com/snaptrude-Revit), Qonic (www.tinyurl.com/qonic-AEC) and many others that have been covered in AEC Magazine over the past 12 months).

Autodesk has finally created the platform change event that it hoped for, without user demand, but it has come at a time when Revit is going to be challenged like never before.

The bridgehead While Forma may sound like a distant destination, and the initial offering may seem inconsequential in today’s workflows, it is the bridgehead on the distant shore. The quickest way to build a bridge is to work from both sides towards the middle and that seems to be exactly what Autodesk is planning to do.

Forma is based on a unified database, which is capable of storing all the data from an AEC project in a ‘data lake’. All your Autodesk favourite file formats — DWG, RVT, DWF, DXF etc. — get translated to be held in this new database (schema), along with those from thirdparties such as Rhino.

The software architecting of this new extensible unified database forms the backbone to Autodesk’s future cloud

offering and therefore took a considerable amount of time to define.

Currently, Autodesk’s desktop applications don’t use this format, so on-thefly translation is necessary. However, development teams are working to seamlessly hook up the desktop applications to Forma. With respect to Revit, it’s not unthinkable that, over time, the database of the desktop application will be removed and replaced with a direct feed to Forma, with Revit becoming a very ‘thick client’. Eventually the functionality of Revit will be absorbed into thin-client applets, based on job role, which will mainly be delivered through browserbased interfaces. I fully expect Revit will get re-wired to smooth continuity before it eventually gets replaced.

Next-generation database One of the most significant changes that the introduction of Forma brings is invisible. The new unified database, which will underpin all federated data, lies at the heart of Autodesk’s cloud efforts. Moving away from a world run by files to a single unified database provides a wide array of benefits, not only for collaboration but also to individual users. To understand the structure and capabilities of Forma’s new database, I spoke with Shelly Mujtaba, Autodesk’s VP of product data.

Data granularity is one of the key pillars of Autodesk’s data strategy, as Mujtaba explained, “We have got to get out of files. We can now get more ‘element level’, granular data, accessible through cloud APIs. This is in production; it’s actually in the hands of customers in the manufacturing space.

“If you go to the APS portal (Autodesk May / June 2023

19

31/05/2023 13:54

Platform Services (https://aps.autodesk.com) connectors are bi-directional. Looking at (formerly Forge), you’ll see the Fusion the Rhino connector you can send data to Data API. That is the first manifestation of Revit, and you can get data back from this granular data. We can get component Revit. Inventor is now the same (it used level data at a granular level, in real time, to be one directional, where it was Revit as it’s getting edited in the product. We to Inventor only) so you can now take have built similar capabilities across all Inventor data and push it into Revit.” industries.

“The AEC data model is something that Offline first we are testing now with about fifteen pri- In the world of databases there have been vate beta customers. So, it is well under- huge strides to increase performance, way — Revit data in the cloud — but it’s even with huge datasets. One only has to going to be a journey, it is going to take us look to the world of games and technoloa while, as we get more and richer data.” gies like Unreal Engine.

To build this data layer, Mujtaba One of the terms we are likely to hear a explained that Autodesk is working lot more in the future is ECS (Entity methodically around workflows which Component Systems). This is used to customers use, as opposed to ‘boiling the describe the granular level of a database’s whole ocean’. The first workflow to be structure, where data is defined by comaddressed was conceptual design, based ponent, in a system, as opposed to be just on Spacemaker. To do this, Autodesk being a ‘blob in a hierarchy data table’. worked with customers to identify the I asked Mujtaba if this kind of games data needs and learn the technology was being data loops that came with used in Forma. He replied, iterative design. This was “ECS is definitely one of Autodesk has also one of the reasons the foundational concepts finally created that Rhino and TestFit are we are using in this space. among the first applicaThat’s how we construct the platform tions that Autopdesk is these models. It allows us change event focussing on via plug-ins. extensibility; it allows us that it hoped for, flexibility and loose couInteroperability is without user another key pillar, as pling between different Mujtaba explained, “So systems. But it also allows demand, but it making sure that data can us to federate things. This has come at a move seamlessly across means we could have data time when Revit coming from different product boundaries, organisational boundaparties and be able to is going to be ries, and you’ll see an aggregate and composite challenged like example of that also with through the ECS system. never before the data sheet.”

“But there’s many other At this stage, I brought things that we have to also up Project Plasma, which consider. For example, one followed on from Project Quantum. of the most important paradigms for Mujtaba connected the dots, “Data Autodesk Fusion has been offline first — exchange is essentially the graduation of making sure that while you are disconnectProject Plasma. I also led Project Plasma, ed from the network, you can still work so have some history with this,” he successfully. We’re using a pattern called explained. “When you see all these con- command query responsibility separation. nectors coming out, that is exactly what Essentially, what we’re doing is we’re writwe are trying to do, to allow movement of ing to the local database and then synchrodata outside of files. And it’s already ena- nising with the cloud in real time.” bling a tonne of customers to do things This addresses one of my key concerns they were not able to do before, like that, as Revit gets absorbed into Forma exchange data between Inventor and over the next few years, users would Revit at a granular level, even Inventor have to constantly be online to do their and Rhino, even Rhino and Microsoft work. It’s really important that team Power Automate. These are not [all] members can go off and not be connected Autodesk products, but [it’s possible] to the Internet and still be able to work. because there’s a hub and spoke model Mujtaba reassuringly added, “We are for data exchange. designing everything as offline first, “Now, Power Automate can listen in while, at some point of time, more and on changes in Rhino and react to it and more of the services will be online. It you can generate dashboards. Most of the really depends on what you’re trying to

‘‘

’’

20

May / June 2023

pXX_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Forma.indd 20

do. If you’re trying to do some basic design, then you should be able to just do it offline. But, over time, there might be services such as simulation, or analytics, which require an online component.

“We are making sure that our primary workflows for our customers are supported in an offline mode. And we are spending a lot of time trying to make sure this happens seamlessly. Now, that is not to say it’s still file-based; it’s not filebased. Every element that you change gets written into a local data store and then that local data source synchronises with the cloud-based data model in an asynchronous manner.

“So, as you work, it’s not blocking you.

You continue to work as if you’re working on a local system. It also makes it a lot simpler and faster, because you’re not sending entire files back and forth, you’re just sending ‘deltas’ back and forth. What’s happening on the server side is all that data is now made visible through a Graph QL API layer.

“Graph QL is a great way to federate different types of data sources. Because we have different database technologies for different industries, because they almost always have different workflows.

Manufacturing data is really relationshipheavy, while AEC data has a lot of key value pairs (associated values and a group of key identifiers). So, while the underlying databases might be different, on top of that we have a Graph QL federation layer, which means from a customer perspective, it all looks like the same data store.

You all you get a consistent interface.”

Common and extensible schemas One of the key benefits of moving to a unified database was that data from all sorts of applications can sit side by side, level 200 / 300 AEC BIM model data with Inventor fabrication-level models. I asked Mujtaba to provide some context to how the new unified database schema works.

“It’s a set of common schemas, which we call common data currencies — and that spans across all our three industries,” he explained. “So, it could be something basic, like basic units and parameters, but also definitions or basic definitions of geometry. Now, these schemas are semantically versioned. And they are extensible. So that allows other industry verticals to be able to extend those schemas and define specific things that they need in their particular context. So, whenever this data is being exchanged, or moved across different technologies under the covers, or between different www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 13:54

Feature

From Autodesk SpaceMaker to Autodesk Forma Over the last four years there have been many software developers aiming to better meet the needs of conceptual design, site planning and early feasibility studies in the AEC process. These include TestFit, Digital Blue Foam, Modelur, Giraffe and Spacemaker to name but a few. The main take up of these tools was in the property developer community, for examining returns on prospective designs.

In November 2020, just before Autodesk University, Autodesk paid $240 million for Norwegian firm Spacemaker (www. spacemaker.ai) and announced it as Autodesk’s new cloud-based tool for architectural designers.

Autodesk had been impressed with both the product and the development team and rumours started coming out that the team would be the one to develop the cloud-based destination for the company’s AEC future direction.

This May, Autodesk launched Forma, which is essentially a more architectural biased variant of the original application and, at the same time, announced it was retiring the Spacemaker brand name. This created some confusion that Forma was just the new name for Spacemaker.

However, Spacemaker’s capabilities are just the first instalment of Autodesk’s cloudbased Forma platform, the conceptual capabilities, which will be followed by Revit.

Forma is a concept modeller which resides in the cloud but has tight desktop Revit integration.

Designs can be modelled and analysed in Forma and sent to Revit for detailing. At any stage models can be sent back to Forma for further analysis. This twoway connection lends itself to proper iterative design.

At the time of acquisition, Spacemaker’s geometry capabilities were rather limited.

The Forma 3D conceptual design tool has been enhanced with the merging of FormIT’s geometry engine (so now supports arcs circles, splines), together with modelling based on more specific inputs, like number of storeys etc. It’s also possible to directly model and sculpt shapes. For those concerned about FormIT,

www.AECmag.com

pXX_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Forma.indd 21

the product will remain in development and available in the ‘Collection’.

One of the big advantages hyped by Autodesk is Forma’s capability to enable modelling in the context of a city, bringing in open city data to place the design in the current skyline. Some countries are served better than others with this data. Friends in Australia and Germany have not been impressed with the current amount of data available, but I am sure this is being worked on.

Looking beyond the modelling capabilities, Forma supports real-time environmental analyses across key density and environmental qualities, such as wind, daylight, sunlight and microclimate, giving results which don’t require much deep technical expertise. It can also be used for site analysis and zoning compliance checking.

At time of launch, Autodesk demonstrated plug-ins from its third-party development community, with one from TestFit demonstrating a subset of its car parking design capability, and the other from Shapedriver for Rhino.

Talking to the developers of these products, they were actively invited to port some capabilities to Forma. Because of the competitive nature of these products, this is a significant move. Rhino is the most common tool for AEC conceptual design and TestFit was actually banned from taking a booth at Autodesk University 2022 (we suspected because TestFit was deemed to be a threat to Spacemaker). In the spirit of openness, which Autodesk is choosing to promote, it’s good to see that wrong righted. By targeting Rhino support, Autodesk is clearly aware of how important pure geometry plays to a significant band of mature customers.

1

2

3

Autodesk Forma is currently heavily focused on conceputal design 1 Revit and Forma integration 2 Rapid operational energy analysis

4

3 Microclimate analysis 4 Daylight potential analysis

May / June 2023

21

31/05/2023 13:54

Feature

silos, you know they’re using the lan- schemas are also becoming available to workflows, but with APIs and an indusguage of the Common Data currencies. customers too.” try interest in open data access, files may “On top of that data model, besides Back in the days of AutoCAD R13, eventually go the way of the dodo.

ECS, we also have a rich relationship Autodesk kind of broke DWG, by enaframework, creating relationships bling ARX to create new CAD objects Conclusions between different data types and differ- that other AutoCAD users could not Forma in the long-term is bold, brave and, ent level of details. We spend a lot of time open or see. The fix for this was the intro- in its current incarnation, the down paymaking sure that relationship, and that duction of proxy objects and ‘object ena- ment for everything that will follow afterthat way of creating a graph-like struc- blers’ which had to be downloaded, so wards for Autodesk. However, it has been ture, is common across all industries. So, ARX objects could be manipulated. To a long time coming. In 2016, the same year if you’re going through the API, if you’re this backdrop, the idea that users can that Quantum was announced at Autodesk looking at Revit data and how you get the augment Forma’s schema was a concern. University, Autodesk also unveiled Forge, relationship, it will be the same as how Mujtaba explained, “You can decide the a cloud-based API which would be used to you get Fusion relationships.” default level of visibility to only you can break down existing products into discreet To put it in common parlance, it’s a bit see it, but you might say this other party services which could be run on a cloudlike PDF. There is a generic PDF defini- can see it, or you can say this is univer- based infrastructure. tion, which has a common schema for a sally visible, so anyone can see it.

Forge was designed to help Autodesk whole array of stuff. But then there’s “To be honest, we are learning so we put its own applications in the cloud, as PDF/A, PDF/E and X, which are more have a private beta running within the well to help its army of third-party develspecific to a type of output. Autodesk has Fusion space of extension data extensi- opers build an ecosystem. Forge recently defined the nucleus, the schema for eve- bility with a bunch of customers, because was rebranded Autodesk Platform rything that has some common shared this is a big demand from our customers Services (APS). I actually don’t know of elements. But then there are some things and partners. So, we are learning. any other software generation change that you just don’t need if you’re in an “The visibility aspect came up, and, in where so much time and effort was put architecture environinto ensuring the ment, so there will be development tools and flavours of the unified APIs were given priorForma in the long-term is bold, brave and, in its database that have ity. The reason for this extensions. But converis possibly because, as current incarnation, the down payment for gence is happening and in the past, these tools everything that will follow afterwards for increasingly AEC is were provided by Autodesk. However, it has been a long time coming Microsoft Foundation meeting manufacturing in the offsite factories Classes, while for the around the world. cloud Autodesk is havMujtaba explained that because of con- fact, our original visibility goal was only ing to engineer everything from the vergence Autodesk is spending a lot of ‘you can see this data’. And then we ground up. time on governance of this data model learned from the customers that no, they While this article may appear a bit trying to push as much as possible into would selectively want to make this data weird, as one might expect a review of the common layer. visible to certain parties or make it uni- the new conceptual design tools, for me “We’re being very selective when we versally visible. the most important thing about Forma is need to do divergence,” he said. “Our “We are continuing to do very fast iter- the way that it’s going to change the way strategy is, if there is divergence, let it be ations. Now instead of going dark for we work, the products we use, where intentional not accidental. Making sure several years and trying those things and data is stored, how data is stored, how that we make a determined decision that trying to boil the ocean, we are saying, data is shared and accessed, as well as this is the time to diverge but we may ‘here’s a workflow we’d like to solve. new capabilities, such as AI and machine come back at some point in time. If those Let’s bring in bunch of customers and learning. Looking at Forma from the schemas look like they’re becoming com- let’s solve this problem. And then move user-facing functional level that has been mon across industries, then we may push to the next workflow’. So that’s why you exposed so far, does not do it justice. This it down into the common layer. see things coming out at a very rapid is the start of a long journey.

“Another piece of this, which is super pace now, like the data exchange connec- ■ www.autodesk.com/company/autodesk-platform/aec important, is that these schemas are not tors, and the data APIs”. just limited to Autodesk. So obviously, we It’s clear that the data layer is still to Autodesk Forma is available through the understand that we will have a data some degree in development, and I don’t Architecture, Engineering & Construction model, and we will have schemas, but we blame Autodesk for breaking it down into (AEC) Collection. A standalone subscription are opening these schemas to the custom- workflows and connecting your tools that is $180 monthly, $1,445 annually, or $4,335 ers so they can put custom properties into are commonly used. This is a vast devel- for three years. Autodesk also offers free the data models. That has been a big opment area and an incredibly serious 30-day trials and free education licences. demand from customers. ‘So, you can read undertaking on behalf of Autodesk’s While Forma is available globally, Autodesk the Revit data, but can I add properties? development team. It seems that the strat- will initially focus sales, marketing and For example, can I add carbon analysis egy has been clearly identified and the product efforts in the US and European mardata, or cost data back into this model?’ data tools and technologies decided upon. kets where Autodesk sees Forma’s automa“Because customers would just like to In the future, I am sure files will still play tion and analytical capabilities most aligned manage it within this data model, custom a major role in some interoperability with local customer needs.

‘‘

’’

22

May / June 2023

pXX_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Forma.indd 22

www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 13:54

Sponsored content

SPACES SPEND MORE TIME DESIGNING Lead architects create the most value in the concepting stage, where their experience and vision allow them to set the project’s parameters and overall design intent. By enabling architects to spend more time in this stage, with more data and feedback, we create better project outcomes and happier and more fulfilled architects who spend more time doing what they do best and enjoy the most.

By: Campbell Yule, Founder, Spaces by Cerulean Labs designs but starting points for creativity and thinking.

You can explore ideas quickly when you don’t need to resolve every specific detail, and you can test different ideas without investing a significant amount of time.

As Spaces is an iPad application, you can work anywhere - you can pick a work environment that helps your creativity - a cafe, a beach, or the subway to work. So even with limited time, you can easily pull out your iPad and sketch fresh ideas as inspiration strikes.

As everything is digital, involving your co-workers via Spaces simple sharing feature is easy. Like much of today’s world, you no longer need to be in the same office, allowing you to collaborate and receive input from remote team members.

At Spaces, we are developing a tool that is all about concepting. But what do we mean by that?

Concepting is all about the early stages of the design process. A process where you need to explore, think, make, create, and express. It is not a linear process with a defined start and end point but rather a circular/ iterative process. It involves testing and rejecting. Sometimes you will ‘throw away’ an entire concept, while at other times, you’ll keep and discard parts and continue to evolve.

The concepting process is why you

became an architect; it is part of your job you enjoy the most, and it’s where your ideas grow, take shape and provide the basis for the future stages of the design workflow. As an architect, you add the most value to the project in these early stages setting the core design principles in place.

Spaces is The Architectural Concepting App that supports this process. As with pencil and paper, Spaces provides the freedom to explore quickly and easily. You can start with the sketching of ideas in the tradition of napkin sketches. These are not resolved

About Spaces - Design More Spaces is the specialist tool for the conceptual design part of the architectural process.

We fit between pen and paper and BIM, bringing together the flexibility and speed of pencil and the power and data of BIM. For more information, refer to our website: www.spacesapp.io.

We offer a free version of Spaces to get your concepting started.

Click below

Opinion

Can FIM solve the ‘modular It’s time for a unified platform that supports the interests and activities of all stakeholders in a construction project, and where design and fabrication are linked at all times, writes Tal Friedman

F

abricated integrated modelling, or FIM, offers an innovative way to use digital technology to achieve a new economy of scale fit for the built world environment. A major issue that it aims to solve is the modular question. In short, as long as construction projects are conducted as a series of ‘bubbles’, thanks to fragmented data and supply chains, the same problems arise again and again.

Offsite construction has long been touted as the future of the construction industry, since way back in the late 1960s. It promises faster construction times, reduced waste and increased efficiency. However, despite the apparent advantages, offsite construction factories have never lived up to these promises.

But in recent years, there has nevertheless been a resurgence of interest in this area, as part of a wider construction technology movement. This has led to significant investments in new factories that claim to do things differently. In fact, it’s fair to say that the modular construction world has enjoyed something of an epiphany, backed by large investments from venture capital firms looking to profit from a revival of the concept. These investments have been spurred on by a view of construction as the next big opportunity for digital disruption.

With the development of IT and automation tools, the timing seemed right for change, and governments were equally enthusiastic, pitching in to create incentives.

It appeared for a while that a long-awaited transformation was about to happen.

So what went wrong? Why are we witnessing a slew of modular companies either going bankrupt or filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection? What happened to the built environment revolution that was apparently on the cards and how might FIM get it back on track?

The rise and fall of Katerra was just the beginning. Soon, more and more investors joined the goldrush, lured by the potential rewards on offer for the company that finally succeeds in creating the ‘building factory of the future’. Unfortunately, these approaches have collapsed time and time again, leaving industry professionals still wrestling with the still unsolved modular question. How can something seemingly so logical on paper continue to be thwarted by reality? And if manual construction is outdated, slow and inefficient, how come it repeatedly beats offsite construction to the punch?

Answering the modular question In the hunt for a solution, a good place to start is by thoroughly understanding the

problem. In this case, companies face a number of issues, typically summed up by the following: To get scale, you need scale Perhaps the biggest problem in the field of any automation, especially as heavy as construction, is the need for scale.

Effective assembly lines only function well under standardised and repetitive conditions. Therefore, in order for any one project to be cost-effective, you need to have many projects in the pipeline.

Building twice Building offsite essentially means constructing a building twice - once in the factory, and then again on site. That involves funding a large, spacious factory, equipped with high-cost assembly lines, even before the first commissioned project arrives. The upfront costs are huge and the return on investment is unclear. This leaves us once again tackling a scalability requirement.

The chicken-and-egg of distance Transportation costs are another major challenge. It is extremely expensive and time consuming to transport modular buildings, especially volumetric ones, from factory to construction site. But the

FIM versus BIM There are six main verticals where FIM seeks to move BIM from a fragmented process supported by multiple point solutions to a uniform platform. It’s not about creating sketch pads and calculators, but about creating an informed design process fed by real-world data shared by all stakeholders.

1.

24

Real-time data analysis: FIM provides real-time analysis of structural and thermal performance during the design process. This allows architects and engineers to make informed decisions and optimise

May / June 2023

p24_25_AEC_MAYJUNE23_FIM-MacBook Pro (2).indd 24

designs for better performance and efficiency.

2.

3.

Efficient design iterations: With FIM, design iterations can be done quickly and easily. Changes to the design can be made in real-time, and the impact of those changes on performance can be immediately evaluated. This leads to more efficient design iterations and faster project completion.

Simplified collaboration: FIM simplifies collaboration between project stakeholders, including architects, engineers,

contractors, and manufacturers.

Because FIM is based on a shared data model, everyone has access to the same information and can work together more efficiently.

4.

Improved accuracy: FIM uses a data-driven approach that relies on accurate and comprehensive information. This leads to more accurate modelling and better performance predictions.

5.

Integration with manufacturing processes: FIM can be integrated with manufacturing processes, which allows manufacturers

to optimise their production processes and reduce waste. This integration also allows for more accurate cost estimates and better project planning.

6.

Sustainability: FIM can be used to evaluate the sustainability of a building design, including factors such as energy use, material selection, and waste reduction. This allows architects and engineers to design more sustainable buildings and reduce the environmental impact of construction projects.

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:58

Feature

lar question’?

closer your organisation is to the target destination for building, the more you will pay in labour, factory rent and transport.

Rather than limiting designs to fixed layouts, the approach seeks to standardise only what needs to be standard, while also permitting freedom of design where needed. Rather than fragmented point solutions for design, as in classic BIM, FIM promises to create a unified platform that supports the interests and activities of all stakeholders and where design and fabrication are linked at all times.

FIM can help architects and engineers

Combining the power of AI with the creativity of human designers, FIM starts by defining the design requirements and constraints of a project. These requirements The customisation challenge are then entered into the platform, which Not all buildings are created equal. Since uses generative AI to create a range of most buildings are not designed for fabridesign options that meet the requirements. cation, most projects will be given permits Designers can then select the options based on spatial layouts rather than fabrithat best meet their needs and refine them cation models. That means a complete further. This process allows designers to rework to match the standardisation of explore a wide range of design options offsite construction is quickly and efficiently, needed, taking up a lot of reducing the time and time and extra cost. costs involved.

Using generative AI to match design intent and FIM also incorporates The FIM solution real-world constraints means that designs can DfMA principles into the FIM presents a generative easily be translated into modular construction design process, ensuring approach that can help that designs are optimised components in a seamless manner solve the modular dilemfor manufacturing from ma and increase the scalathe very beginning. This bility and profitability of means that they can be modular construction factories through create designs that are optimised for easily translated into modular construcsmart planning automation. As artificial manufacturing from the beginning. tion components, reducing production intelligence (AI) concepts unimaginable in Using generative AI to match design costs and increasing efficiency. the past unravel themselves on a daily intent and real-world constraints means Modular factories, meanwhile, can basis, using FIM principles can unlock that designs can easily be translated into increase their scalability and profitability much of the long-awaited potential of modular construction components in a by supporting multiple projects that share modular construction. seamless manner, without having direct similar attributes, and then optimising FIM offers to standardise the construc- expertise when it comes to all the manu- those for their facilities. Additionally, the tion process using a smart kit of parts facturing data. That allows them to focus speed and efficiency of the design process that can be adapted to (almost) any lay- their efforts on what really matters - the mean that modular construction factories out. Using smart network effects, build- quality of design, rather than an endless can take on more tenders and approvals, ing plans optimised for smart supply game of Ping Pong with regulators, fabri- further increasing scalability. chains can support mass customisation. cators and other stakeholders.

■ www.talfriedman.com

‘‘

’’

www.AECmag.com

p24_25_AEC_MAYJUNE23_FIM-MacBook Pro (2).indd 25

May / June 2023

25

29/05/2023 07:58

Opinion

2023: a pivotal year for AEC technology… again While the construction industry may have struggled to achieve the same advancements in productivity from technology as other sectors, clearly there remains tremendous potential for change, writes Richard Harpham

A

s industry leaders, thinkers and technology providers come together for the 2023 NXT BLD and NXT DEV conferences in London, the intellectual effort and commitment to address the issues and opportunities across design, engineering and construction are still as strong as ever.

But, after a year of experiencing technological advancements such as OpenAI’s GPT, it can be disheartening to see the building production industry still struggling with issues such as delayed projects, budget overruns, and a continuing lack of integration between design and construction.

So, as we undoubtedly meet and beat ourselves up again, that the technology benefits experienced in manufacturing, aviation, and automotive, have not yet permeated the construction sector, I’d like to assert that it is unequivocally inevitable that these issues will be solved by technology.

In this brief article, I want to look back, to look forward from my own experiences in companies like Bovis Construction, Infrasoft, Revit Technologies, Autodesk and Katerra, to share some thoughts on why we contin26

May / June 2023

p26_27_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Harpham.indd 26

ue to stall in our attempts to radically improve building production outcomes.

Constructability and Prefabrication As I’ve written previously, one of the core challenges lies in the disconnect between design and constructability, both in the processes and the software that supports them. Too often, design teams fail to consider the practical aspects of construction, leading to inefficiencies and delays. It’s not a huge surprise, as few architects are schooled in pre-construction, scheduling and project management.

My old building director at Bovis used to routinely greet me in the site hut with, “Have you brought another set of comics to review”, as I unrolled hours of painstaking drawing work on his desk.

It was an unspoken truth that what I drew and what he built might not always match up.

The black art of construction management, that comes from decades of experience in making stuff work on the building site, is still more comparable to panel beaters in custom car shops than any modern automotive manufacturing environment. And we see that clearly in how numerous prefabrication companies,

despite their potential, have faced obstacles in scaling their operations. As I’ve experienced, some of the most forwardthinking ideas in prefabricated design solutions crash into onsite issues in fully leveraging their benefits on site.

Until industry stakeholders collaborate closely, ensuring that design better accounts for constructability, as well as embraces prefabrication, viable solutions to enhance efficiency and reduce project timelines might continue to evade us.

Data-driven pre-construction The reliance on memory and experience during pre-construction is a major roadblock to progress. During the last three years, it has become clear to me the construction industry must shift towards data-driven decision-making. And that data must be presented both as explicit instructions and implied opportunities to change actions at the time they can have the most impact.

Currently, the industry has had to rely on software that, at best, tells them what happened, not what is happening, and certainly not what is going to happen. If this were the banking or healthcare industry, it would be unthinkable not to leverage every data source in to as close www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:19

Feature

‘‘

The black art of construction management, that comes from decades of experience in making stuff work on the building site, is still more comparable to panel beaters in custom car shops than any modern automotive manufacturing environment

’’

to real-time as possible in order to find valuable answers or avoid catastrophic issues. In fact, even your car can now observe and consume data to make corrective actions to traffic, weather and obstacles in real-time.

To catch up with other industries, software providers must develop the platforms that enable the capture, organisation, and utilisation of all data within and around a project. Then, by leveraging AI derived from continuous machine learning, contractors could make informed decisions, accurately estimate timelines and costs, and identify potential risks, thereby avoiding costly delays.

Then, collaboration tools should more easily and ‘automagically’ facilitate seamless communication and coordination among project stakeholders, enhancing productivity and reducing delays. Surely this is no longer a debate, but rather a minimum requirement to advance construction productivity.

Collaboration for Success One of the things I enjoy most about coming to conferences like NXT BLD is experiencing the collaborative attitude growing at the grass roots of our industry.

This has not always been the case. www.AECmag.com

p26_27_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Harpham.indd 27

Building a successful future for construction requires collaboration among all stakeholders, including architects, engineers, contractors, software providers, and regulatory bodies. By fostering this environment of open dialogue and knowledge sharing, we can collectively drive meaningful change.

Industry associations, trade organisations, and government entities increasingly promote collaboration and provide support for initiatives that drive innovation and productivity gains. This is one area of design and construction that we have improved and continue to get better at. Now we need to see the technology providers follow this lead and realise that success for the industry does not look like we all use the same brand of solutions, but rather that the solutions can both match our business needs and are capable of data integration across the whole construction ecosystem.

In conclusion, while the construction industry may have struggled to achieve the same advancements in productivity from technology as other sectors, clearly there remains tremendous potential for change. In recent years I have spent considerable time with tier-one general contractors looking deeply into data insight

and collaboration challenges, to establish how machine learning and AI algorithmic technologies might address longstanding inefficiencies. The good news is that it is a target rich environment, with most data in firms still siloed across overly complex software stacks. But it’s not as simple as just adding AI tools to that stack. We must generate the right questions from emerging and new key metrics that are different from those we have relied on in the past.

The metrics that no matter will be found by constructability, leveraging data-driven decision-making, enhancing real-time visibility, and promoting collaboration.

Software providers continue to have a crucial role in developing the solutions that leverage these metrics and help construction professionals transform processes.

Just as we were surprised when we first saw ChatGPT and GPT4, we’re probably going to be equally surprised by what we will achieve over the next few years, and I firmly believe we are just at the start of dramatic improvements in design and construction technology.

NXT BLD and NXT DEV take place on 20 and 21 June at London’s Queen Elizabeth II Centre ■ www.nxtbld.com ■ www.nxtdev.build

May / June 2023

27

30/05/2023 18:19

Grand Central The scale and complexity of Minnucci Associates’ BIM pilot project at Naples Central Station gives a compelling glimpse of what better facilities management might look like in the future for other organisations

O

pening out onto the city’s imposing and historic Piazza Garibaldi, there has been a railway station on the site occupied by Naples Central Station (Napoli Centrale) since the mid-nineteenth century. The current station was designed and built in the 1950s and today handles around 400 trains per day and 150,000 passengers, making it the sixth largest train station in Italy for passenger flow.

It is also the site of a pioneering BIM pilot project, exploring the use of BIM for facility management on a massive scale.

The BIM manager for this project was Minnucci Associates, an engineering company based in Rome, Anguillara Sabazia 28

May / June 2023

p28_29_AEC_MAYJUNE23_GrandCentral.indd 28

and Milan, working on behalf of the station owner, Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (RFI), which is responsible for the management and safety of railway traffic on the entire national network, including tracks, stations and installations.

Faced with the need to develop new buildings while simultaneously keeping existing buildings and equipment in good condition, RFI initiated the project with a view to capturing the station’s assets.

Through surveying and modelling, a digital twin would be created and then converted to an open and collaborative format, supporting integration with RFI’s facilities management system in order to improve the whole-life value of assets.

A heavyweight pilot For the team at Minnucci Associates, this challenge represented one of the most data-heavy projects it had ever worked on. To give an idea of the complexity involved, Naples Central Station is spread across five buildings, covering around 400,000 square feet and containing some 12,500 components subject to maintenance. These components include electrical, HVAC, hydraulics and vital safety equipment.

The work began with a survey of the site, using laser scanners and orbital pictures, resulting in a massive point cloud of 380 GB in size. From there, the team at Minnucci Associates developed www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:59

Case study

‘‘

The main challenge was the vast size of the model. Graphisoft BIMcloud came to our aid, as we were able to divide the survey data and the resulting model into federated files, then remerge later either within Archicad, or using the exported IFC models Daniele Piccirillo, BIM Manager

’’

The site survey resulted in a massive 380 GB point cloud

a digital twin of the station, including equipment needing maintenance.

The station was modelled by comparing and combining survey data, existing drawings and census outcome, with all the input data and output models organised in a common data environment (CDE).

Graphisoft’s Archicad was the chosen BIM authoring tool. In total, 44 models were federated and then imported into Solibri in IFC format. By mapping the BIM authoring tool with IFC open standards, Minnucci Associates was able to create automated workflows and instant asset recognition.

Using Graphisoft’s BIMcloud, the www.AECmag.com

p28_29_AEC_MAYJUNE23_GrandCentral.indd 29

team organised survey data and models into a single, catalogued database.

Formalised as an BIM execution plan, the RFI team was able to approve changes and request information remotely throughout the entire process. This system also allowed them to reincorporate individual files, both in Archicad’s authoring model and later in IFC models. Today, on-site tasks are supported through the use of a mobile app directly connected to the CDE.

Scale and complexity “The main challenge was the vast size of the model,” says Daniele Piccirillo, BIM Manager at Mannucci Associates.

“Graphisoft BIMcloud came to our aid, as we were able to divide the survey data and the resulting model into federated files, then remerge later either within Archicad, or using the exported IFC models.”

Given the scale of the site, the complexity of the models and the numerous processes supported, this is a pioneer project for the use of BIM for asset and maintenance management. It also offers a compelling glimpse of how improved facilities management might look for organisations across a wide range of industries. A digital twin approach could work for many.

■ www.graphisoft.com

May / June 2023

29

29/05/2023 07:59

www.nxtbld.com

NXT BLD 2023 Artificial Intelligence (AI), DfMA, reality capture, BIM bureaucracy, the Metaverse, AEC workflows, and next gen BIM authoring tools, are just some of the topics up for discussion at AEC Magazine’s NXT BLD in London on 20 June

W

ith the real and sudden rise of AI, the pace of change within the AEC industry has hit phenomenal new levels. And it is already having a massive impact on how we design, construct and manage buildings and infrastructure.

NXT BLD will present the latest AI developments, and how they are already impacting different workflows, from early stage design and autonomous modelling / drawing production, to GIS, reality capture, construction and beyond.

NXT BLD will also offer incredible insights into the workflow challenges and solutions at leading AEC firms, including

Foster + Partners, HOK, Arup, BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group), Zaha Hadid Architects, Herzog & de Meuron and more.

DPR Construction, Kreod and Slate will present new ways to bring new efficiencies to construction, from DfMA and modern methods of construction to AI. This year, NXT BLD will be followed by NXT DEV, a brand new event that delves even deeper into future AEC software development, providing an opportunity to see a whole range of next generation ‘BIM 2.0’ software in action, discuss what AEC IT directors at leading firms want from these tools, and provide a unique forum to discuss AI, sustainability, offsite construction and much more.

Martha Tsigkari & ARD Group Head of Applied R+D Foster + Partners Foster + Partners’ multi-disciplinary Applied Research and Development (ARD) group comprises architects and engineers who can program. The group is tasked with solving complex design problems, developing tools and evaluating the latest hardware and software. Tsigkari and her team will give an insight into the group’s latest ground-breaking research projects.

30

May / June 2023

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 30

NXT BLD Tuesday 20 June 2023 8:30am - 7:00pm Queen Elizabeth II Centre Westminster, London www.nxtbld.com

NXT DEV (see page 36) Wednesday 21 June 2023 8:30am - 5:30pm Queen Elizabeth II Centre Westminster, London www.nxtdev.build

Exclusive £99 offer for AEC Magazine readers For readers of AEC Magazine, we are offering a strictly limited number of combination two days tickets for NXT BLD and NXT DEV for £99.

Simply use the promotional code 99BLD. Tickets include full access to the conference and exhibition, refreshments, lunch and drinks at the networking reception.

When they’re gone, they’re gone! www.nxtbld.com/tickets-2023

Two days only £99

www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 19:58

London 20 June 2023

AI

Architecture in the age of AI Tim Fu Zaha Hadid Architects www.AECmag.com

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 31

Dive into the world of AI-driven design with Tim Fu from Zaha Hadid Architects. “AI’s transformative impact is now being felt in the realm of design, following its significant influence across various industries.” Spanning architecture to product design, Tim will illuminate the pivotal role of AI in present and future design practices.

May / June 2023

31

30/05/2023 18:12

www.nxtbld.com BJARKE INGELS GROUP (BIG) COPENHILL PROJECT, COPENHAGEN. IMAGE COURTESY OF RASMUS HJORTSHØJ

Cloaked in bureaucracy: The Emperor’s new clothes in the world of BIM? Jens Majdal Kaarsholm director of design technology BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group) In the fast-paced world of BIM, where promises of efficiency and innovation abound, there is a lurking phenomenon that often goes unnoticed – the rising tide of bureaucracy.

In this thought-provoking presentation, Kaarsholm will delve into the hidden layers of red tape that have woven themselves into the very fabric of BIM processes and workflows.

Drawing inspiration from Hans Christian Andersen’s timeless tale, Kaarsholm will unveil the invisible threads of bureaucracy that have ensnared the BIM landscape, presenting an illusion of progress while hindering its true potential. He will explore how the once-revolutionary concept of BIM, with its promises of streamlined collaboration, data-driven decision-making, and improved project outcomes, has been encumbered by complex regulations, standards, and compliance requirements.

Through engaging anecdotes and insightful honesty, this presentation reveals the consequences of excessive bureaucracy on BIM projects. Jens will shed light on the paradoxical situation where BIM, intended to enhance efficiency, can paradoxically lead to delays, cost overruns, and frustration. By examining real-world case studies, Kaarsholm will expose some of the underlying causes and manifestations of bureaucratic bottlenecks that impede the realisation of BIM’s transformative power.

Data Part 3: Assemble?

Greg Schleusner Principal/Director of Design Technology // HOK In previous NXT BLD talks Schleusner spoke about: The challenges the AEC industry faces and subsequently, what other industries can tell us about the solution.

This year’s talk will conclude the Trilogy; This ending will be more Jedi than Trinity!

Watch Schleusner’s presentations from NXT BLD 2021 (QR top) and 2022 (QR bottom)

32

May / June 2023

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 32

Enabling design interaction for clients and partners Alvise Simondetti & Giulia Simone // Arup Simondetti, a computational specialist, will draw on a decade of specialist work from the stakeholder communication of the design for Dongtan, the first sustainable city in China to the wayfinding design validation of Admiralty, Hong Kong’s busiest metro station.

Then Simone, a computational architect, will demonstrate the initial success on a current campus design in the adoption of the powerful high-fidelity workflow made available to all designers by Nvidia Omniverse and the power of today’s high-spec Lenovo hardware.

The open industrial metaverse Cobus Bothma // Nvidia With the world moving towards a more connected, digitised, and automated future, industries, including construction and design, need new tools and technologies to keep up. Nvidia Omniverse is an extendable platform that offers a collaborative, real-time and open environment for designers, engineers, and contractors to work together seamlessly while allowing the development of AI and simulation functions to build an industrial metaverse. This innovative approach creates virtual replicas of physical assets, allowing businesses to collaborate on their designs, simulate virtual worlds and review construction processes from anywhere before deploying them in the real world.

Meta verse

Pingfan Wu, from China’s Hunan Architectural Design Institute (HNADI) Group, developed an Omniverse extension that makes controlling the sun and its effects on scenes within the platform more intuitive and precise

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:12

London 20 June 2023

The AI ‘algorithmic assistant’ Adi Shavit // Swapp In AEC Magazine’s AI Special Edition (Nov / Dec 2022) we began our journey to better understand how artificial intelligence will impact design and construction. In Swapp, we found a contender for the most audacious AI tool yet for automating detail design work and producing drawings.

At NXT BLD, chief science officer, Adi Shavit, will share Swapp’s latest developments

Charlie Dunn DPR Construction

BIM 2.0

Product design and engineering – form and function Cathal Loughnane // Aston Martin Jenni Ramsay // Lenovo The design and engineering of Lenovo’s new ThinkStation workstation chassis has been a three-year collaboration journey.

To bring this trio of workstations to life, Lenovo partnered with its customer, Aston Martin, the legendary high-performance automotive manufacturer, to co-design the new ThinkStation chassis. Cathal Loughnane, head of partnerships at Aston Martin and product manager, Jenni Ramsay from Lenovo will share Lenovo’s design and engineering journey with Aston Martin.

Con Tech

Charlie Dunn of DPR Construction, a US general contractor focused on highly complex and technical projects, will be asking if we really are focusing innovation and technology development on the problems that matter in design and construction.

The rise of digital master builders Chun Qing Li // Kreod For centuries, being an architect meant being a builder. As early as the mid-16th century, the term “Architekton” in Greek referred to the Master or Chief Builder. Architects were not only the master of spatial design but also closely involved in the construction process.

What factors contributed to the erosion of the integrated role of architect, engineer, and contractor over time? In what ways is technology enabling the reunification of architects, engineers, and contractors in ways that were previously not achievable through traditional methods?

Chunq Qing Li (AKA Lee), the founder of Kreod companies, will share his experience in architectural design, Kreod Integrated DfMA Intelligent Automation (KIDIA) software development and construction.

www.AECmag.com

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 33

DfMA

May / June 2023

33

30/05/2023 18:12

www.nxtbld.com

London 20 June 2023 Geo BIM

How GIS is accelerating much needed change in AEC Marc Goldman // Esri Join Goldman as he presents the impact of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) on the AEC industry. In this session he explores the pivotal role of GIS in driving much-needed change, and uncovers the limitless possibilities when combined with IoT, AI, knowledge graphs, remote imagery, reality-capture, CAD, BIM and more.

Using a combination of real-world examples and research projects, learn how the convergence of GIS with the current wave of transformative technologies is reshaping the AEC landscape.

ArcGIS Reality City model of Frankfurt displaying textured and mesh data

Using AI in architectural design Pamela Nunez Wallgren & Jesper Wallgren // Finch

AI

Decision making latency - data silos within the AEC industry

Join the founders of Finch as they talk about the future of how AI and architects design together and explore how AEC professionals can leverage the capabilities of new technology to design innovative, sustainable buildings that shape the future of architecture.

Data Driven Performance Dr. Sarah Surgeoner // Creative Building Performance Data Driven Performance at the individual building level or more ambitious ESG and Net Zero strategies at Enterprise or City level. In this session Surgeoner will explore some of the ways technology is evolving to leverage the wealth of available data in making a positive impact.

Net zero

Pamela Nunez Wallgren & Jesper Wallgren // Finch

The full line-up for NXT BLD (www.nxtbld.com/conference-program-2023) Martha Tsigkari & ARD Group // Foster + Partners Jens Majdal Kaarsholm // BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group) Greg Schleusner // HOK Charlie Dunn // DPR Construction Tim Fu // Zaha Hadid Architects Alvise Simondetti & Giulia Simone // Arup Cathal Loughnane // Aston Martin & Jenni Ramsay // Lenovo Chun Qing Li // Kreod Pamela Nunez Wallgren & Jesper Wallgren // Finch Marc Goldman // Esri Michael Drobnik // Herzog & de Meuron

34

May / June 2023

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 34

Senthil Kumar // Slate Technologies Martin Bach // aurivus Adi Shavit // Swapp Johan Hanegraaf // Arkio Maria Yablonina // University of Toronto Mike Leach & Mark Hirst // Lenovo Cobus Bothma // Nvidia Dr. Sarah Surgeoner // Creative Building Performance Mark Van Den Bergh & Tiemen Strobbe // Qonic Jenya Andersson, Abhinav Chaudhary & Michael Polisano // PLP Architecture

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:12

spaces ALL GREAT ARCHITECTURE STARTS WITH A LINE

www.nxtdev.build

London 21 June 2023

NXT DEV 2023 NXT BLD is followed by NXT DEV, a brand new conference for the future of AEC software. There’ll be panel discussions on AI, sustainability and construction, the opportunity to see ‘Next Gen’ BIM 2.0 tools in development, plus lots more

N

XT DEV is a unique forum for the future of AEC software development. It brings together leading AEC practitioners, software developers and investors to discuss what comes next for the good of our industry.

The event will focus on how the AEC industry can dramatically drive and accelerate productivity with BIM 2.0 technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). NXT DEV will also explore how to break proprietary lock in of project data and digitally connect end-to-end, from concept to fabrication.

From talking with leading firms (the most mature of BIM practitioners) AEC Magazine recognises that the AEC industry is at a crossroads. The previous generation of desktop applications have matured and, in many cases, development velocity has plateaued.

The limitations of BIM 1.0 and the rise of cloud, SaaS and AI, combined with the AEC industry demanding increased data interoperability means we need next generation thinking.

NXT DEV is the event where software developers can meet with and learn from industry-leading AEC design IT Directors as to where the ‘tech stack’ pain points are,

as well as meet and hear from Venture Capitalists (VCs) and Angels active in funding start-ups and new contenders.

There’ll be presentations from a whole host of ‘BIM 2.0’ software developers, some of which are using AI to deliver dramatic productivity benefits, plus panel discussions on AI, sustainability, off-site construction and much, much more.

NXT DEV Wednesday 21 June 2023 8:30am - 5:30pm Queen Elizabeth II Centre Westminster, London www.nxtdev.build

BIM 2.0

‘BIM 2.0’ - shaping the future of AEC software NXT DEV provides a unique opportunity to see many of the new ‘BIM 2.0’ software developers all under one roof.

Some focus on the front end of the process, enabling performance-driven design and text-to-BIM model generation. Others seek to automate time-consuming tasks, helping firms sidestep

much of the detail modelling and drawing production associated with BIM 1.0.

Could BIM 2.0 even be used automate the design of entire buildings?

See presentations from Swapp, Qonic, Snaptrude, Blue Ocean Sustainability, Arcol, Hypar, Augmenta, and Finch, all of which have featured in AEC

Feature

C ean AE c O e u l B ls ing too develop els ers are sign mod develop n BIM detail de ere neratio tion of While th Next-ge produc n. e tio th uc to be tomate ing prod al looks that au m draw es, end-go wnstrea ere, the in minut and do oduced to get th ings pr y ways d draw are man odels an y m Da e: n m ty the sa ites Mar wr s, th not mon

Magazine over the past 12 months.

NXT DEV will also provide the opportunity to hear from design IT directors and heads of R&D at leading AEC firms on what they want from next gen AEC products – delivering real productivity and changing workflows.

Be part of the conversation.

active Hypar-

uch of estep m s to sid ted lp user associa e firm he uction softwar mpany ing prod all co aw a sm dr r, a d pa Could ing an rts on Hy l modell Day repo the detai tly that Martyn ? ac ex 1.0 M to do with BI looking

softneeded ith s that project ” Rozman client exist yet, is that one of actual didn’t y son t — and e that other rea g compan to fron - war s. “The in the holdin ry back ted soft wn for explain indust motiva stors I’ve kno one ws the dings, co-inve a small, value and new kno was t Hol d the g tha 2.0 eves Buildin . Arol Wolfor He set up g new the BIM nity he beli Green it. can brin faster. um in years now bers of Rev e team glacial commu oment market k in the thirty s war with the ment rd mem tions to d to Data bac r. He’s w. Thi develop applica his frustration e firms ten of the boa n Market evie to gro Els ran , es war d ctio com ital In fact continu industry vete ed big soft smaller cer Constru sold it to Ree in the cap , tact at which him to join a offi and known erica.” month ith con k of pace led nology a, day pretty-well Am Rozman f tech rate has ak pea Atlant North now t ope (Marty) give us a sne its chie pany is AEC in dings, ogy tha y as to Martin com space for technol l, pan gazine lding Hol That ken Bui arbonisation AEC Ma neration BIM highly unusua (CTO). eer wor sed Gre t-ge an AEC his car This is stay in stealth rgia-ba as a dec years ago. the nex Blue Oce ng much of what was the en an life to king on. es: Geo ndi , this spe ich beg firm some fifte s is LEED, ates the tim he’s wor y folks prefer at er of wh por t-up is . Aft a sign e cor ines ancy market at larg creating a star since man perhaps it’s consult its core bus delling services the BIM But of ing on of ay, ith. soul of mode. rgy mo a year, hetti, one attracti Rozman ith Tod AM and ene e for the rlie for rlie Cic the rac e? I ask ing with Cha hin the sion of erway. l, but Rozman BRE

by Cha wit stag mis und up y his the D ded talk nt fellows now trul es can be dul of LEE It is hea “I was has spe to expandething interest , LEED munity wanted ound and C tool develign Resum the 300 trong com the US. and he an and do som address des d backgr of AE 0-s t manto group als in Oce has a soli the forefront ration, 300,00 l produc fession gs is a con- Blue looking at ally ope king Holdin technica Architectural ified pro career eventu . We are ludes lly wor n cert en Building . He was for up ing struction and also inc r is rea 9. He the Gre opment Autodesk a new ent Gro which con s this yea ed at 6 and 199 starting t panies, e Investmtainability, ager my focu een 199 a start-up call t of com side and We’re differen tainabl p betw sed but the design cy Sus e Ocean Sus cts join C. produc tan focu to Deskto AE of hite sul an lab arc on ctor todesk and Blu g software Blue Oce ware by ction. left Au hnology as dire (SIG) ldin constru the brand, we create soft . e en bui tion of h, bon in Revit Tec t. ause he replies , big softwar y 2 acquisi moth- a gre suring car Kristina Bac men en bec itects,” ’s 200 nce mea by manage . The US Gre todesk for arch my experie k into the e on latter is led e selling With Au sucked bac another thre that the review actual sultativ ask a bunch “From s The reviewer do con he was he spent re er, d to nies the of role tom t hire bur es Revit, pan l cus firs a seri where the hot er group, g Counci ES com front of the n starting for ership, Buildin Within the wid y called GB try to find use to extract go in re leav structio and rdbefo con s), ns, s. pan can and vice years, sing affo ring-inproject training com t they of questio there on Ser ufactu on hou tomer blem tha Educati ,000 of the also a in man focused ing pro the cus lding lt is panies ity. from some 150 US-based een Bui Dassau . It’ll up com tainabil money continues. of fine joined the (Gr ich has trained 300,000 and sus d ity en kin ith he wh abil mature ays wh then,” Rozman at a time ioned t’s alw have a AEC Next, 2, rement als. this team ld an And tha e once you es in 201 ng to bui r stint as afo D profession joined m ency in sons I tryi Systèm e revenu ECmag.co y was a ten-yea director LEE e of the rea ted a compet s and driv www.A “On compan re, he put in ant star consult n strategy y had team. The ctor and the was the and they had 10:39 the s. e dire s in 23/03/2023 itie war sale n/C soft been structio ds, having manith of Con rty Roz er wor In oth long, Ma s for so 3 busines 202 il Apr

M

r can IM: Hypa from a Text-to-B building models ten definition writ

m ECmag.co www.A 22/03/2023

20

32

36

May / June 2023

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 36

d 32

Ocean.ind

RIL23_Blue

_MARCHAP

4_35_AEC

p32_33_3

18:28

2023 / April March

/ March

d 20

_Hypar.ind

CHAPRIL23

AEC_MAR

2_23_24_

p20_21_2

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:12

www.nxtdev.build

London 21 June 2023

How will AI impact AEC?

AI

NXT DEV panel discussion

A wish list for next-generation BIM What functionality do leading AEC firms want to see in next generation BIM tools?

The Autodesk Open Letter Group (OLG) will deliver a ‘wish list’ for future AEC software, followed by a panel debate on BIM 2.0.

Over the last 12 months we’ve seen some incredible applications of AI in AEC, from Textto-Image with Midjourney and Text-to-BIM with ChatGPT to semi-automated design and fully automated drawing production.

IMAGE COURTESY OF BLUE OCEAN AEC

The impact of AI on the AEC industry will be far reaching.

Founder stories Business lessons for AEC startups from industry leaders. Moritz luck (Enscape) and Eric De Keyser – Qonic (original developer of TriForma, founder of Bricscad)

Net zero

IMAGE COURTESY OF ENSCAPE

But how far away are we from fully automated design and how will this affect the AEC workforce?

Just some of the topics up for discussion in this unmissable NXT DEV panel session.

Offsite design and construction panel How can the AEC industry digitally connect design through to construction and successfully utilise offsite as a common way of working?

Sustainability panel How can next-gen technologies help the AEC industry meet stringent, future sustainability goals?

Mirren Fischer MDRxTECH

38

Off site

May / June 2023

p30_31_32_33_34_36_38_AEC_MAYJUNE23_NXTBLD.indd 38

VC panel Hear from those funding the AEC technology sector – how to pitch, what areas are hot, the outlook for the market.

Featuring: Jess Clemans, A/O Propetech, Tom Kurke; Bentley Acceleration Ventures; Alessandro Robustelli, ActivumSG Ventures; Felipp Leutiger, Holocim Maqer.

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:12

WWW.AECMAG.COM

Workstation special report Summer 2023

Le no Th vo ink P7 Sta & P tio X n Intel Xeon ‘Sapphire Rapids’

ec gam

E| AM | FR RE ZU

E|

TA

AM

OF

| FR

OS

RE

ZU

CR

TA

MI

OF

| AW S| GLE GO O | AM D|

EL INT A|

FR

IDI | NV FR

AM

AM E

E|

E AM

FR FR

OS MI CR

| AW S| OG LE GO D| | AM TEL | IN

IDI | NV

E AM

DIA | INTEL | AMVDID| GIOA | INTEL | AMD | G OOG | NVI E | N OGLE | LE AM |

A IDI

|

E| A|

|

IDI

NV

A IDI

AM | NV FR

OS CR MI S| | AW LE E| OG AM GO | FR D| RE ZU | AM TA EL OF INT OS A| CR MI IDI S| NV | AW OFT AZURE | FRA E| LE ICROS AM ME OG | NV FR GO D|

OFT AZURE | FRA ICROS ME

S|M AW

S|M AW

FR FR

NV ID

FRAME | NVIDIA | INTEL | AMD | GOOGLE | AWS

EL INT

TEL | IN

A IDI | NV

A|

GO D|

| AM

GO D| | AM

LE OG

S | AW

ICR |M LE OG

S| | AW

MI

O CR

S

T OF

AZ

OS

UR

E|

OF

AM FR

ZU TA

E

| RE

E AM

PROFILE PROFILE

IA

E| AM

workstation special report

FR

A| IDI

FRAME | NVIDIA | INTEL | AMD | GOOGLE | AWS

I NV

| DIA

gam

r ont ec

workstation special report

| NV

How do Intel’s long-awaited workstation processors compare?

r ont

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro

EL

INT

| AM

AM E|

Cloud workstations

Nvidia ‘Ada Lovelace’

How the major public cloud providers stack up in CAD, BIM and viz workflows

What do Nvidia’s new generation professional GPUs offer for visualisation?

Cloud workstations are not limited to on-site use with tablets. In an office environment the ‘endpoint’ can also be a standard laptop, desktop PC, thin client, zero client, or even a £35 Raspberry Pi. Users can even plug in a SpaceMouse for precise control in 3D CAD and BIM applications.

www.AECmag.com

WS01_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Cover.indd 1

| FR

High-performance and easy to deploy: the changing role of the desktop workstation

RE

ZU TA

OF

Rack ready

that’s completely destroyable on the office, engineers and architects can also average BIM tool so the big challenge for construction site, something that people access cloud workstations from home. AEC firms is how to give designers the won’t steal, but enables them to access By offering flexible working, Bowker power they need to work effectively. Highsignificantly large amounts of compute believes the technology can not only help end workstations are expensive and can be firms attract the best talent but get more hard to justify when powerful GPUs and resource to run these huge 3D models.” multi-core CPUs will often sit idle when Quantity surveyors can also profit out of them.

“If that resource is expensive and that an application like Revit is being used for from cloud workstations, explains engineers and architects can average BIM tool so the big challenge for that’s “They completely destroyable the office, says, ‘I can’t get in this morning bread andalso butter design work.

Bowker, don’t want to lug aroundonresource workstations AEC firms is how construction site, something that people have an cloud emergency, something I from Cloudhome. workstations can solve thisto give designers the big machines. They can continue with because Iaccess Byout, offering working, Bowker power they need to work effectively. Highwon’tApples steal, orbut enablesdevice themthey to access need to sort but I’ll logflexible in at lunchtime challenge by giving architects and their whatever and get on with my job,’ you shorten the engineers access to the power they need,are on expensive and can be choose and then just access the [cloud] significantly large amounts of compute believes the technology can not only help end workstations risk on deadlines,” he adds. demand.

They can use a local workstation resource for the 3D part of the QS tool firms attract the best talent but get more hard to justify when powerful GPUs and resource to run these huge 3D models.” for 3D CAD and BIM, then move to the remotely.” multi-core CPUs will often sit idle when Quantity surveyors can also profit out of them. cloud for more demanding workflows.

Cloud workstations are not limited Ramping up power is expensive and that an application like Revit is being used for from explains to on-sitecloud use withworkstations, tablets. In an office In the last “If few that yearsresource the AEC sector has Virtual Reality (VR) resource ‘I can’tfriendly get in this morning bread and butter design work.

Bowker, “They don’t want to lug environment the ‘endpoint’ can also be aaround seen rapid growth says, in architect standard laptop, desktop client, viz software.

This includes real time tools One workflow has workstations previously because I have an emergency, something I that Cloud can solve this big machines.

They PC, canthin continue with zero or even £35 Raspberry Pi. like Enscape, been consideredchallenge off limits for needTwinmotion to sort out,and butLumion, I’ll logasin at lunchtime by cloud giving architects and theirclient, Apples or a whatever device they Users can even plug in a SpaceMouse well as ray trace renderers like V-Ray for workstations is virtual reality (VR). and get on with my job,’ you shorten the engineers access to the power they need, on choose and then just access the [cloud] for precise control in 3D CAD and BIM Revit, SketchUp and Rhino.

With VR, low latency is essential for a risk on deadlines,” he adds. demand.

They can use a local workstation resource for the 3D part of the QS tool applications.

All of these applications have much convincing experience that also doesn’t forso 3D CAD and trip BIM, then move to the remotely.”

Instead of being tied to a desk in the bigger hardware demands than your make you feel sick, adding a round

Ramping up power

cloud for more demanding workflows. / February 2019 WS7 In the last few years the AECJanuary sector has seen rapid growth in architect friendly Virtual Reality (VR) viz software. This includes real time tools One workflow that has previously like Enscape, Twinmotion and Lumion, as been considered off limits for cloud well as ray trace renderers like V-Ray for workstations is virtual reality (VR).

Revit, SketchUp and Rhino.

With VR, low latency is essential for a All of these applications have much convincing experience that also doesn’t

29/05/2023 06:49

A POWERFUL COMBINATION TO MAXIMIZE WORKSTATION PERFORMANCE Combine the compute power of advanced graphics cards for professional creators with AMD Ryzen™ and Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO processors to dial-in system performance and maximize creative potential. The new AMD Radeon™ PRO W7000 Series Workstation Graphics, with options for 48GB or 32GB memory, lets you handle 3D models and RAW media files while making it easier to multitask between apps. The new AMD Radiance Display™ Engine, alongside support for DisplayPort™ 2.1, enables next generation 12K displays and delivers 8K at 60Hz with 68 billion colors – while providing dual simultaneous encode / decode engines and superior refresh rates.

#AMD #TogetherWeAdvance

To learn more visit amd.com/RadeonPRO

©2023 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, Radeon, AMD RDNA, Ryzen, Threadripper, and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Other product names used in this publication are for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. PID#: 232087024 Version: 1

workstation special report

The flexible workstation

by Greg Corke

If one thing has become clear in 2023, it’s that flexible working is here to stay. AEC firms that resorted to ‘sticking plaster’ hacks to get them through the pandemic, are now looking for more robust solutions to support staff working from home.

Centralising workstations and data is key but there are many ways to skin this particular cat — public cloud, private cloud, or on-premise Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI). The humble desktop workstation is becoming as much at home in the data centre as it is on the desk.

In the UK, there are plenty of specialist firms that will happily replace your office workstation resource with one in a dedicated server room or the cloud.

Many are laser-focused on the AEC sector, bringing expertise in BIM-centric workflows and data management as well as the remote workstations themselves.

Inevidesk goes hard on price with its custom ‘pods’ (tinyurl.com/inevidesk-AEC).

CreativeITC is addressing sustainability (see page WS44), Scan is applying its knowledge of desktops to the cloud (see page WS23), while IMSCAD has its eggs in many different remoting technology baskets (see page WS42).

Then, of course there’s the major public cloud service providers. Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Microsoft Azure give firms on-demand access to a wide a variety of GPU-accelerated virtual workstations anywhere in the world. And in true public www.AECmag.com

WS03_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Comment-MacBook Pro (2).indd 3

cloud fashion, everything is elastic, so firms can upscale and downscale as needs change. This can be done directly through the cloud provider or via multi-cloud platforms like Frame or Workspot.

Performance can vary dramatically between VMs, which is something we explore in our in-depth report on page WS30. If you don’t know your g4dn.xlarge from your NC16asT4v3 and everything in between, this is an essential read.

Public cloud has many benefits, particularly when it comes to global availability and IT management, but for performance alone, it’s impossible to compete with the desktop workstation.

With desktops, instead of giving each user a slice of a multi-core CPU or GPU, they get a dedicated resource, often with a CPU optimised for frequency rather than number of cores.

Firms including HP and Lenovo have cottoned on this and are now building rack mount and remote management capabilities directly into their personal workstations, blurring the boundaries between desktop and datacentre. You also get the simplicity of a 1:1 connection so you don’t need to get involved with the complexity and cost of virtualisation.

The Lenovo ThinkStation P7 and PX, for example, harness the power of Intel

‘Home office’ stock photo, but does anyone really have a home office that looks like this?

‘Sapphire Rapids’ CPUs and Nvidia RTX Ada Generation GPUs to handle some of the most demanding AEC workflows (see page WS14). Meanwhile, with the HP Z2 Mini G9 you get incredible rack density in a workstation optimised for CAD (see page WS42), all managed through the HP Anyware remoting solution.

Finally, cloud doesn’t always have to play second fiddle to desktop in terms of performance. UK firm Armari, through its ‘Ripper Rentals’ cloud workstation service, has the most powerful Intel Xeon W-3400 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro workstations we’ve ever used. With custom liquid cooling they push Intel’s and AMD’s flagship workstation processors to their absolute limits, delivering up to 19% more performance than standard aircooled desktops (see page WS11).

When it comes to workstations, there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. Some firms go all in on cloud or VDI, others use a variety of desktop, mobile and virtual, wherever they make sense. Centralised workstations can offer massive benefits, delivering performance wherever work may take you, but then you’re always reliant on good connectivity. And, as a recent rail journey from London to Sheffield reminded me, you can still struggle to download a simple email attachment at times.

May / June 2023

WS3

30/05/2023 18:26

workstation special report

Intel Xeon ‘Sapphire Rapids’ AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro for rendering, simulation, reality modelling, CAD and beyond

WS4

May / June 2023

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 4

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:24

workstation special report

Intel has launched its long awaited ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation processors, but do they have enough to surpass AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper Pro? Greg Corke puts these high-end CPUs through their paces

T

en years ago, it would have been unthinkable that Intel today would be playing catchup with AMD in workstation processors. But, the overwhelming success of AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro, coupled with Intel’s failure to launch a true workstation-class processor since 2019, has led us to this precise situation.

Intel desperately needs its new ‘Sapphire Rapids’ Xeon processors — specifically the Intel Xeon W-2400 and W-3400 — to be a success.

The chip giant certainly has its work cut out here. With Threadripper Pro, AMD delivered the holy grail of workstation processors, combining vast numbers of cores (up to 64) with high turbo frequencies and high-memory bandwidth to deliver impressive performance wherever your workflows may take you — single threaded CAD, multithreaded rendering, or memory intensive

simulation, Threadripper Pro can handle pretty much anything you throw at it.

Not surprisingly, Intel has followed a similar tack for its new ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation processors — up to 56-cores, up to 4.8 GHz turbo and 8-channel DDR5 memory. It also follows AMD in terms of architecture. Like Threadripper Pro, ‘Sapphire Rapids’ processors feature a ‘chiplet’ design where several smaller chips are packaged together as one. This is in contrast to traditional monolithic designs, where all cores are on a single chip, making it more prone to manufacturing defects, and therefore lower yields and higher cost.

Intel has a much wider workstationfocused product range than AMD, with a total of fifteen models across its Intel Xeon W-2400 and W-3400 series (see chart on page WS6). In contrast, there are only six “Zen 3” Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5000 WX-Series models, sporting 12,

16, 24, 32 or 64 cores. All have 8-channel DDR4 3200 memory.

Intel Xeon W-2400 / W-3400 Intel differentiates its Xeon W-2400 and Xeon W-3400 processor families in two main ways: by number of cores and by memory channels.

The Xeon W-2400 Series is classified as a ‘mainstream’ workstation processor with eight models ranging from 6 to 24 cores and 4-channel DDR5 4800 memory.

Meanwhile, the Intel Xeon W-3400 Series is for ‘experts’ with seven models ranging from 12 to 56 cores and 8-channel DDR5 4400/4800 memory.

The new processors are comprised entirely of ‘Golden Cove’ cores — they do not have the hybrid Performance Core (P-Core) / Efficiency Core (E-core) architecture pioneered by 12th Gen and 13th Gen Intel Core processors.

‘Golden Cove’ is not Intel’s latest CPU

Intel Xeon w7-2495X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

# of CPU Cores

24

56

60

64

24 (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores)

16

# of CPU Threads

48

112

120

128

32

32

Base Frequency

2.5 GHz

1.9 GHz

1.9 GHz

2.7 GHz

3.00 GHz (P-cores) 2.20 GHz (E-cores)

4.50 GHz

Max Boost / Turbo Frequency

4.8 GHz

4.8 GHz

3.5 GHz

4.5 GHz

5.80 GHz (P-cores) 4.30 GHz (E-cores)

5.70 GHz

Max memory size

2 TB

4 TB

4 TB

2 TB

128 GB

128 GB

Memory type

DDR5 - 4,800 MHz

DDR5 - 4,800 MHz

DDR5 - 4,800 MHz

DDR4 - 3.200 MHz

DDR5 - 5,600 MHz

DDR5 - 5,200 MHz

Memory channels

4

8

8

8

2

2

Cache

Smart Cache (L3) - 45 MB

105 MB Intel® Smart Cache

112.5 MB

L1 Cache - 4 MB L2 Cache - 32 MB L3 Cache - 256 MB

L2 Cache - 32 MB Smart Cache (L3) - 36 MB

L1 Cache - 1 MB L2 Cache - 16 MB L3 Cache - 64 MB

Default TDP

225 W

350 W

350 W

280 W

125 W

170 W

Peak / Max Turbo power

270 W

420 W

N/A

N/A

253 W

181 W

Price (Ex VAT)

£2,000

£5,250

$17,000 (from Intel.com)

£5,167

£474

£450

(from scan.co.uk 2/5/23)

www.AECmag.com

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 5

May / June 2023

WS5

30/05/2023 18:24

workstation special report

architecture. It formed the foundation for the P-Cores in 12th Gen Intel Core.

Beyond the cores, there are some other significant differences between the two processor families. Compared to the Intel Xeon W-2400, the Intel Xeon W-3400 has more memory capacity (4 TB vs 2 TB), more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) (so it can support more add-in GPUs), more Intel Smart Cache (L3), and a higher max base power (350W vs 225W).

As a first for Xeon processors, certain models — those with an X suffix — are unlocked so the processor can be overclocked. A range of tuning features are available through the Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (Intel XTU).

While it’s highly unlikely that major OEMs will ever go down the overclocking route, this level of control could leave the gates open for specialist workstation manufacturers to differentiate themselves by squeezing more performance out of the platform. This might be one for the future,

however. Currently, there are no off-the shelf All-in-One (AIO) water coolers that we know of for the power-hungry processors, although UK firm Armari has developed a custom liquid cooling solution for its Intel Xeon W-3400 rack workstation (see box out on page WS11).

Among the Intel Xeon W-2400 Series, the processors that stand out are the Xeon w7-2495X and w7-2475X which combine high core counts with the highest boost frequencies. The lower-end models may be suited to certain Finite Element Analysis (FEA) or other simulation tools that benefit from higher memory bandwidth but can’t necessarily take advantage of large numbers of cores. They can also provide a platform for multi-GPU workflows, such as GPU rendering.

There’s a similar pattern with the Intel Xeon W-3400 Series, with the higher end models featuring the largest number of cores and highest boost frequencies.

The range tops out with the 56-core Intel

Intel Xeon W-2400 Series processors

Xeon w9-3495X with a base frequency of 1.9 GHz and a Turbo Boost Max 3.0 of 4.80 GHz. The lower-end CPUs in the family, such as the Intel Xeon w5-3425, could offer similar potential benefits for engineering simulation, plus support for even more GPUs. You can see the full specs in the tables below.

Meanwhile, Xeon W-2400 and Xeon W-3400 supports the latest technologies, including PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 4400/4800 memory (which offers more memory bandwidth than Threadripper Pro’s DDR4 3200) and Intel WiFi 6E. While the majority of workstations focus on the single socket, high core count Intel Xeon W-2400 and Xeon W-3400 Series, ‘Sapphire Rapids’ does not spell the end for dual processor workstations.

4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors, which are primarily designed for servers, have already made their way into workstations from HP and Lenovo.

The top-end model, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H, offers 60-cores per processor, which gives you a whopping 120 cores in a dual socket workstation.

However, among the major OEMs, you’ll only see this chip in the Lenovo ThinkStation PX (read our review on page WS14) and, at $17,000 per processor, the market it somewhat limited. The HP Z8 G5 also comes with 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors, but only those models with up to 32-cores.

Test setup

Intel Xeon W-3400 Series processors

For our testing we focused on the top end workstation processors from Intel and AMD — the 56-core Intel Xeon w9-3495X and 64-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX. We also tested the dual socket 60-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H. You’ll find details of our test machines below. However, it should be noted that both Lenovo workstations were preproduction units, so they may be slightly different to the final shipping machines.

Performance, for example, may increase with BIOS updates, so our test results should not be treated as gospel.

Lenovo ThinkStation P7 • Intel Xeon w9-3495X CPU (56-cores) (1.9 GHz base, 4.80 GHz Turbo Boost 3.0) • 256 GB (8 x 32 GB) DDR5 4,800MHz memory • 4 x Nvidia RTX A4000 GPU (16 GB) • 2 TB Samsung PM9A1 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for workstations • (read our review on page WS14)

WS6

May / June 2023

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 6

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:24

workstation special report

Benchmarks: processor comparisons SPECWorkstation 3.1

Agisoft MetaShape Professional 1.73

Solidworks 2022

Simulation tests (CFD and FEA)

Puget Systems benchmark (photogrammetry)

SPECapc benchmark (CAD)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

1.23 Time secs (smaller is better)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

135

14.80

WPCcfd

84

13.11

157

Rock Model

24.96

Rebuild

2.16

2.41

2.32 1.53 1.62

159 1.35

215

6.77

13.61

rodinia (CFD)

30.14

405

2.17 1.41 1.56

617 1.11

706

5.47

Calculix (FEA)

2.28

Convert

School Map

8.79

2.02

314

6.77

1,231

1.99

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X AMD Ryzen Threadripper 0 5 Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon 25 Platinum30 8490H 35

Intel 10 Xeon w9-3495X 15 20

0

Intel Core i9-13900K

300

600

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

x Intel Xeon 9002Platinum 1200 8490H

2.18

Simulate

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

1.99 1.55

1500

1.60 1.40

Leica Cyclone Register 360

2.19

Point cloud registration

2.41

Mass properties

2.57 1.67

1.23 Time secs (smaller is better)

1.19 1.17 1,145 1,054

1.79 2.26

1,194

Large dataset (99 GB)

2.06

Boolean

1,356

1.35

1,509

0

500

1.12 1.05

1,772

1000

1500

2000

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

KeyShot 11.3.1 benchmark

Cinebench R23 benchmark

Cinebench R23 benchmark

Ray trace rendering

Ray trace rendering

Ray trace rendering

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

2.75

5.65 5.70

CPU test

22,691

2,193

37,862

2,022 1,368

Single-core test

37,601

Multi-core test

70,286

12.36 1,670

9.15

0

5

1,279

16.65 10

15

20

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

0

Intel Core i9-13900K

500 1000 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

V-Ray 5.0 benchmark

Recompile shaders

Ray trace rendering

1.23 Time secs (smaller is better)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

308.23

40000

60000

80000

100000

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

59,982

102.63

47,056

78.52 100

20000

2000 2500 Intel Xeon w9-3495X

29,458

CPU benchmark

85.93

50

0

84,920

26,952

189.7

0

16,427

194.4 Audi Car Configurator model

1500

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

Unreal Engine 4.26

58,796

150

200

250

300

350

0

20000

40000

60000

95,937 80000

100000

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

www.AECmag.com

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 7

May / June 2023

WS7

30/05/2023 18:24

workstation special report

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro processors feature up tp 64-cores

Lenovo ThinkStation PX • 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H CPUs (60-cores) (1.9 GHz base, 3.5 GHz Max Turbo) • 256 GB (16 x 16 GB) DDR5 4,800MHz memory • Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation GPU (48 GB) • 2 TB Samsung PM9A1 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for workstations • (read our review on page WS14)

Cinebench with all 64-cores.

Finally, it’s important to note that all our tests were done with the ‘ultimate performance’ Windows power plan and power draw may be different with future BIOS updates.

On test

and designers, some of which do benefit from having more cores or higher memory bandwidth. So, it’s important to understand how ‘Sapphire Rapids’ performs in CAD. We used Solidworks 2022 as our yardstick, a mechanical CAD application that is largely single threaded or lightly threaded, so only uses a few CPU cores.

As expected, the Intel Core i9-12900K, Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD Ryzen 7950X had a clear lead. With fewer cores, higher turbo frequencies, and (apart from the Core i9-12900K) better IPC, Intel and AMD’s high-end workstation processors simply can’t keep up.

The Xeon w9-3495X did show a small but significant lead over the Threadripper Pro 5995WX in the rebuild, convert and simulate tests. But the Xeon w9-3495X didn’t have things all its own way, lagging behind in the mass properties and boolean operations tests.

To get an idea of pure single threaded performance, albeit through a synthetic rendering test, we also used the Cinebench ST benchmark. Here the Xeon w9-3495X had a clear lead of 22% over the Threadripper Pro 5995WX. Interestingly, despite its significantly lower turbo frequency, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H wasn’t that far behind the AMD processor.

We tested all three workstations with a range of real-world applications used in AEC and product development. We also compared performance figures from Intel’s and AMD’s ‘consumer’ processors, Reality modelling Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T including 12th Gen Intel Core (Core i9- Reality modelling is becoming much • AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 12900K), 13th Gen Intel Core (Core i9- more prevalent in the AEC sector. Agisoft 5995WX processor (64-cores) 13900K), and ‘Zen 4’ AMD Ryzen 7000 Metashape 1.73 is a photogrammetry tool (2.7 GHz base, 4.5 GHz boost) Series (AMD Ryzen 7950X), although we that generates a mesh from multiple hi• 256 GB (8 x 32GB) Samsung ECC did not have a data for all our benchmarks. res photos. It is multi-threaded, but uses Registered DDR4 3200MHz memory multiple CPU cores in fits and starts. It • Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation Computer Aided Design also uses some GPU processing, but to a GPU (48 GB) CAD isn’t a key target workflow for much lesser extent.

• 2TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe Intel ‘Sapphire Rapids’ or AMD Ryzen We tested using a benchmark 4.0 SSD Threadripper Pro. In fact from specialist US • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro architects, engineers and workstation manufacturer • (read our review on page WS22) designers that only use Puget Systems.

The For the last few Threadripper bread-and-butter design Pro Power hungry tools like Solidworks, years AMD has 5995WX just about edged To put it bluntly, Intel’s ‘Sapphire Inventor and Revit, will the Xeon w9-3495X had little in the out Rapids’ processors are very power almost certainly be better in the smaller Rock model way of hungry. Both the Intel Xeon w9-3495X served by 12th or 13th Gen test but was 13% faster in and Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Intel Core processors or competition in the larger school map test. processors have a base power of 350W. AMD Ryzen 7000 (read workflows that Interestingly, the Xeon But this is only part of the story. our comparison article – Platinum 8490H was way benefit from When rendering in Cinebench, for www.tinyurl.com/13thGenoff the pace. We wonder if many cores or example, we observed 530W at the socket Ryzen7000). the software spreads the with the ThinkStation P7 and 1,000W Intel and AMD’s entryload across both CPUs but high memory at the socket with the ThinkStation PX. level CPU families generally is not optimised for this. bandwidth Even when rendering with a single core, have fewer cores and less It’s hard to explain this by the Lenovo ThinkStation P7 drew a memory bandwidth, but the lower frequency alone. substantial 305W. higher clock speeds and Point cloud processing That’s not to say that the Threadripper higher Instructions Per Clock (IPC), software, Leica Cyclone Register 360, Pro 5995WX is that much better. With which are important for these largely assigns threads according to the amount a default TDP of 280W, the Scan 3XS single threaded applications. of system memory. On a machine with 64 GWP-ME A1128T workstation still drew But these days, CAD is often just one of GB it will run on five threads and on one 474W at the socket when rendering in many tools used by architects, engineers with 128 GB or more it will run on six.

‘‘

’’

WS8

May / June 2023

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 8

www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:24

workstation special report

Impact of memory channels on performance (testing with Intel Xeon w9-3495X) SiSoft Sandra benchmark

V-Ray 5.0 benchmark

Unreal Engine 4.26

Memory bandwidth (Intel Xeon w9-3495X)

Ray trace rendering (Intel Xeon w9-3495X)

Recompile shaders (Intel Xeon w9-3495X)

1.23 Memory bandwidth (bigger is better)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

1.23 Time secs (smaller is better)

24.66 48.99 Memory bandwidth (GB/sec)

96.19

CPU benchmark 141.21

0 32 GB (1 channel)

50 100 128 GB (4 channels)

64 GB (2 channels)

192 GB (6 channels)

184.64

150 200 256 GB (8 channels)

0 32 GB (1 channel)

47,433

46,359

47,592 47,572

110.44 102.63

40000 50000 256 GB (8 channels)

SPECapc benchmark (Intel Xeon w9-3495X)

1.23 Time secs (smaller is better)

1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

159

50

64 GB (2 channels)

Solidworks 2022

Rock Model

0 32 GB (1 channel)

192 GB (6 channels)

Puget Systems benchmark (Intel Xeon w9-3495X)

Rebuild

133.05

47,056

Agisoft MetaShape Professional 1.73

158

Audi Car Configurator model

10000 20000 30000 128 GB (4 channels)

1.63

1.62

1.62

1.57

388.01 217.35

64 GB (2 channels)

160

100 150 200 250 128 GB (4 channels)

300 350 400 256 GB (8 channels)

192 GB (6 channels)

160 159 Convert

School Map

32 GB (1 channel)

0

64 GB (2 channels)

710

704

704

707

706

128 GB (4 channels)

1.57

1.56

1.43 Simulate

1.60

Leica Cyclone Register 360

1.60

Point cloud registration (Intel Xeon w9-3495X)

256 GB (8 channels)

1.23 Time secs (smaller is better)

100 192200 300 400 500 600 700 800 GB (6 channels)

1.15 Mass properties

SPECWorkstation 3.1

1.16

(with 2 threads)

1.19

(with 5 threads) Large dataset (99 GB)

Simulation tests (CFD and FEA) 1.23 Benchmark score (bigger is better)

Boolean

(with 6 threads)

3,319 1,754 1,589

1.22

(with 6 threads)

1,582

1.17

(with 6 threads)

1,509

1.12 2.69

0 32 GB (1 channel)

5.34

32 GB (1 channel)

128 GB (4 channels)

256 GB (8 channels)

64 GB (2 channels)

500

1000 1500 2000 128 GB (4 channels)

2500 3000 3500 256 GB (8 channels)

192 GB (6 channels)

10.33

WPCcfd

13.91

14.80

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

8.63

12.57

rodinia (CFD)

13.32

13.87

13.61

5.21 5.40 5.48

Calculix (FEA)

5.56 5.47

32 GB (1 channel)

0

64 GB (2 channels)

128 GB (4 channels)

3192 GB (6 channels) 6 9

256 GB (8 channels)

12

CFD can be used for aerodynamics

15

www.AECmag.com

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 9

May / June 2023

WS9

30/05/2023 18:24

workstation special report

Processor frequency in relation to number of CPU threads used (using Cinebench R23 custom run with ‘ultimate performance’ Windows power plan)

4.1 4.0 Intel Xeon w9-3495X processor in Lenovo ThinkStation P7

3.9 3.8

Processor frequency (GHz)

3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2

Engineering simulation

3.1

Engineering simulation includes Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).

FEA can help predict how a product reacts to real-world forces or temperatures. CFD can be used to optimise aerodynamics in cars or predict the impact of wind on buildings. Both types of software are extremely demanding computationally.

There are many different types of ‘solvers’ used in FEA and CFD and each behaves differently, as do different datasets.

In general, CFD scales very well and studies should solve much quicker with more CPU cores. Importantly, CFD can also benefit greatly from memory bandwidth, as each CPU core can be fed data quicker. This is one area in which ‘Sapphire Rapids’ can outperform Threadripper Pro. Both have 8-channel memory, but ‘Sapphire Rapids’ uses faster DDR5 4,800MHz whereas Threadripper Pro uses DDR4 3,200MHz. For our testing we used three select workloads from the SPECworkstation 3.1 benchmark. This includes two CFD benchmarks (Rodinia, which represents compressible flow, and WPCcfd, which models combustion and turbulence) and one FEA benchmark (CalculiX, which models a jet engine turbine’s internal temperature).

In Rodinia, the Xeon w9-3495X outperformed the Threadripper Pro 5995WX by a whopping 101%. In WPCcfd, the lead was smaller but, at 13%, still significant. Performance of both processors were dwarfed by the dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H. Both Intel processors fared much worse in the Calculix (FEA) test, where the Threadripper Pro 5995WX took a substantial lead.

3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 0

1

4

8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112

Number of threads

CPU package power in relation to number of CPU threads used (using Cinebench R23 custom run with ‘ultimate performance’ Windows power plan)

400 375 350

CPU package power (Watts)

Intel Xeon w9-3495X processor in Lenovo ThinkStation P7 Intel Xeon W9-3495X processor

325 300 275 250 225 200 175

0

1

4

8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112

Number of threads

The Threadripper Pro 5995WX was 10% faster than the Xeon w9-3495X when registering our 99 GB dataset. Both CPUs lagged behind AMD’s and Intel’s consumer processors. Even though those test machines only had 64 GB of memory, so only ran on 5 threads, their higher frequencies and IPC gave them the lead.

Rendering Ray trace rendering is highly scalable.

Roughly speaking, double the number of CPU cores to half the render time (if frequencies are maintained).

The Threadripper Pro 5995WX WS10

In Cinebench, for example, the Threadripper Pro 5995WX maintained 3.05 GHz on all 64-cores while the Xeon w9-3495X went down to 2.54 GHz. The Xeon w9-3495X’s relationship between power, frequency and threads can be seen in more detail in the charts to the left.

Meanwhile, the dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H beat both single socket processors considerably. But with 120 cores and 240 threads to play with this came as little surprise.

May / June 2023

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 10

significantly outperformed the Xeon w9-3495X in KeyShot and V-Ray, two of the most popular tools for design visualisation, and in Cinebench 23, the benchmark for Cinema4D. The Threadripper Pro 5995WX was 35% faster in Keyshot, 27% faster in V-Ray and 20% faster in Cinebench. This is a considerable lead.

But the advantage that AMD’s top-end workstation processor holds over the Xeon w9-3495X is not just down to it having 8 more cores. The relative energy efficiency of both processors and, therefore, the allcore frequencies they can maintain, has a major impact on performance.

Memory bandwidth In addition to cores, memory bandwidth is one of the main differentiators between workstation processors and their consumer counterparts.

This is governed largely by the number of memory channels each processor supports, but also by the type of memory.

Memory channels act as pathways www.AECmag.com

30/05/2023 18:25

workstation special report

between the system memory and the CPU. the number of cores used in relation to From our tests, however, Sapphire The more channels a CPU has, the faster system memory. This is why performance Rapids is not going to be the Threadripper data can be delivered. drops off massively with 32 GB. Pro 5000 WX-Series killer we thought it 13th Gen Intel Core and the AMD Ryzen As you can see from the charts on might be, at least in the broader AEC sector.

7000 Series have two memory channels, page WS9, memory bandwidth in the In ray trace rendering, the 64-core while the Intel Xeon W-2400 Series has WPCcfd benchmark has a massive impact Threadripper Pro 5995X still has a four, and Intel Xeon W-3400 Series, on performance. Interestingly, even considerable lead over the 56-core Xeon w94th Generation Intel Xeon Scalable and with 6-channels filled, the Intel Xeon 3495X. And while Intel may possibly win Threadripper Pro 5000 Series all have w9-3495X outperforms the AMD Ryzen out at certain price points, simply because eight. To get the full memory bandwidth, Threadripper Pro 5995WX. it has so many different models across its all memory channels must be populated Another workflow massively Xeon W-2400 and W-3400 families, we with memory modules, as was the case influenced by memory bandwidth is certainly don’t expect viz specialists to with all our test machines. recompiling shaders in Unreal Engine move to ‘Sapphire Rapids’ en masse. Plus, As mentioned earlier, ‘Sapphire Rapids’ 4.26 which uses all available cores. as you move down the range, it will face Xeons have an advantage over the AMD However, where Threadripper Pro more competition from 13th Gen Intel Core.

Ryzen Threadripper 5000 Series as they 5995WX loses out in GB/sec it makes up But ‘Sapphire Rapids’ does have some support faster memory – DDR5 4,800MHz for in cores and all-core frequency, as it big plusses. In single threaded workflows compared to DDR4 3,200MHz. still managed to beat the Xeon w9-3495X it appears to have a lead over Threadripper A quick run through the SiSoft Sandra in our automotive benchmark.

Pro, which could make a real difference benchmark shows the comparative Performance in CAD (Solidworks), in some CAD/BIM applications. Better memory bandwidth one can expect. The ray trace rendering (V-Ray) and reality single threaded performance should also Threadripper Pro boost 3D frame rates 5995WX recorded in CPU-limited 139.27 GB/sec, while applications.

The biggest potential benefit comes from engineering the Intel Xeon w9We found the simulation, specifically CFD. Our tests show that 3495X pulled 184.64 biggest potential GB/sec and the dual ‘Sapphire Rapids’ can deliver a massive performance benefit for ‘Sapphire Intel Xeon Platinum to come boost, largely thanks to its superior memory bandwidth Rapids’ 8490H went up to from engineering 325.6 GB/sec. These s i m u l a t i o n , figures help explain specifically CFD. why Sapphire Rapids does so well in our modelling (Leica Cyclone Register 360 Our tests show that ‘Sapphire Rapids’ memory intensive CFD benchmarks. and Agisoft MetaShape Professional can deliver a massive performance boost, To see how memory bandwidth impacts 1.73) appears to be virtually unaffected by largely thanks to its superior memory performance in different workflows, we memory bandwidth. There are a couple of bandwidth. While solvers and datasets tested the Xeon w9-3495X with a variety caveats in Solidworks. In the simulation vary, serious users of tools from Ansys, of different memory configurations, test, performance dropped a little when Altair and others should certainly explore from 1-channel with a single 32 GB going from 4-channels to 1-channel. In what the Xeon W-3400 and 4th Gen Intel DIMM, all the way up to 8-channels with boolean operations, 1-channel memory Xeon Scalable processors can do for them.

8 x 32 GB DIMMs. Interestingly, even with actually delivered marginally better results. Extremely complex simulations can take 6-channels, the Xeon w9-3495X edged out hours, even days to run. Cutting this time the Threadripper Pro 5995WX in memory Conclusion in half could deliver monumental benefits bandwidth, delivering 141.21 GB/sec in The importance to Intel of ‘Sapphire to a project.

SiSoft Sandra.

Rapids’ Xeon W-2400 and Xeon W-3400 All of this is exciting, but one can’t help As most of our benchmarks fit into being a success cannot be overstated. For but keep one eye on the future. AMD is 32 GB of memory, the fact that we reduced the last few years AMD has had little in expected to launch its next generation ‘Zen the capacity should have minimal impact the way of competition in workflows that 4’ Threadripper Pro CPUs later this year. on results, although it can’t be ignored benefit from many cores or high memory And, if rumours of 96-cores and 12-channel altogether. The exception is our Leica bandwidth. Intel will have certainly felt memory (DDR5) become a reality, then any Cyclone Register 360 test, which adjusts the impact of Threadripper Pro. lead Intel might have could be short lived.

‘‘

’’

Overclocking Pump up the power

Intel’s single socket ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation processors can be overclocked. This requires more power to be pumped into the CPU, which, of course, means more heat and therefore liquid cooling. While none of the major OEMs get involved with this, UK firm Armari is an expert.

For the Intel Xeon w9-3495X, Armari has developed a custom water-cooling solution for its 2UR56SR Node, a rack workstation available

www.AECmag.com

WS04_05_06_07_08_09_10_11_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Intel_AMD.indd 11

through its ‘Ripper Rentals’ cloud workstation service. It allows the CPU to support up to 500W on all-core boost — a full 150W above its default TDP. Armari also has a similar offering for the Threadripper Pro 5995WX, the 2UR64TP-RW Node.

We put both machines through their paces in Cinebench R23.

The Intel Xeon w93495X machine hit 2.88 GHz on all cores, 0.3 GHz faster than the air-cooled Lenovo ThinkStation P7.

This delivered a score of 69,811, equating to a significant 19% performance uplift.

The Threadripper Pro 5995WX machine hit 3.35 GHz on all cores, 0.3 GHz faster than the Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T. This delivered a score of

76,117, corresponding to an 8% performance uplift.

Armari also offers an overclocked desktop Threadripper Pro

May / June 2023

workstation, which we reviewed in the January/February 2023 workstation special report.

■ www.armari.com

WS11

30/05/2023 18:25

The only limit is your imagination Workstations for every workflow

Cost-efficient workstations optimised for CAD applications such as AutoCAD, Rhinoceros & SketchUp

Streamline your building projects with workstations optimised for AEC & BIM applications such as Ansys, Archicad & Revit

3XS GW-CAD T112C

3XS GW-CAD T120C

3XS GW-AEC A124C

3XS GW-AEC A132C

• Intel Core i5 12400F • 16GB DDR4 • 4GB NVIDIA T400 • 1TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

• Intel Core i5 13600K • 16GB DDR4 • 8GB NVIDIA T1000 • 1TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

• Intel Core i7 13700K • 32GB DDR4 • 12GB NVIDIA RTX A2000 • 1TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

• Intel Core i9 13900K • 32GB DDR4 • 20GB NVIDIA RTX A4500 • 1TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

£1,049.99 INC VAT

£1,499.99 INC VAT

£1,929.99 INC VAT

£3,399.99 INC VAT

LN127985

LN130226

LN130230

Find your perfect workstation today at:

LN130341

Speed up modelling, animating and rendering with workstations optimised for M & E applications such as 3DS Max, Cinema4D & Unreal Engine

3XS GWP-ME A132C

3XS GWP-ME A132C

3XS GWP-ME A132C

3XS GWP-ME A1128T

• Intel Core i9 13900K • 64GB DDR5 • 20GB NVIDIA RTX A4500 • 2TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

• Intel Core i9 13900K • 64GB DDR5 • 24GB NVIDIA RTX A5000 • 2TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

• Intel Core i9 13900K • 64GB DDR5 • 48GB NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada • 2TB M.2 SSD • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

• AMD Threadripper 5995WX • 256GB DDR4 • 48GB NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada • 2TB M.2 SSD, 8TB SSD RAID • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro • 3 Year Premium Warranty

£3,999.99 INC VAT

£4,499.99 INC VAT

£10,999.99 INC VAT

£19,999.99 INC VAT

LN130222

LN130224

LN133442

LN133444

workstation special report

‘‘

The aesthetic design, functional design and build quality of the ThinkStation P7 and (in particular) the ThinkStation PX, is simply incredible

’’

The Lenovo ThinkStation PX includes lockable front access hot swap storage

WS14

May / June 2023

WS14_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Lenovo.indd 14

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:20

workstation special report

Review: Lenovo ThinkStation P7 and PX These are two of the most well designed and manufactured workstations we’ve ever seen, built for desktop or datacentre, but AEC firms will need to look closely at which workflows will benefit from the new ‘Sapphire Rapids’ Intel Xeon processors inside Price £POA www.lenovo.com/workstations

L

enovo has played its workstation hand extremely well over the last few years. In 2020, while HP and Dell continued to rely on ageing Intel ‘Cascade Lake’ processors to power their high-end workstations, Lenovo embraced AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro and the ThinkStation P620 was born.

The processor’s 64-cores gave Lenovo a significant performance advantage in a range of multi-threaded workflows, from simulation to ray trace rendering. Intel had nothing that came remotely close, but now with its new ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation processors, this is about to change.

And Lenovo is certainly going big with ‘Sapphire Rapids’. Its new workstations, the ThinkStation PX (pronounced P10), P7 and P5 arrived with considerable fanfare in March 2023. The striking black and red design is the result of a collaboration with legendary automaker Aston Martin. The workstation’s front grill and side panel’s flush handle are classic Aston Martin.

The flagship ThinkStation PX is the most expandable of the new machines, featuring dual 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors (up to 2 x 60-cores), up to 2 TB of DDR5 4,800MHz memory, and up to four dual-slot GPUs, including the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

The machine is designed to handle the most demanding multi-threaded or multiGPU workflows such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), ray trace rendering and video editing.

The ThinkStation P7 comes with a choice of workstation-specific Intel Xeon W-3400 Series processors (up to 56-cores), and up to 1 TB of DDR5 4,800MHz memory. The single socket machine will likely hit the price/performance sweet spot for many visualisation and simulation workflows, especially those that want the combination of high clock speeds for single threaded operations and 56-cores. It can also support www.AECmag.com

WS14_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Lenovo.indd 15

up to three dual-slot GPUs. The ThinkStation P5 features Intel Xeon W-2400 Series CPUs (up to 24 cores) and up to two dual-slot GPUs. Lenovo calls the P5 an ‘industry workhorse’ and it looks well suited to a wide range of workflows from CAD and visualisation to simulation and reality modelling, although we expect it will face stiff competition from Lenovo’s Intel Core-based workstations.

Rack optimised The ThinkStation PX and P7 were built from the ground up to be ‘rack optimised’ and offer several features to transform these desktop machines into what Lenovo describes as ‘hybrid cloud workstations’, with remote management capabilities like those found in rack servers.

This includes an optional Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) card that gives IT managers ‘full remote management’. According to Lenovo, it will enable them to monitor the workstation, cycle on and off, perform BIOS or firmware updates and re-image the machine if necessary. In addition to data centre deployments, this could be of interest to IT managers supporting those working from home.

The machines also feature enhanced on-board diagnostics with a small LCD display on the front that shows a QR code in the event of a system error – even out of band failure states when a machine won’t turn on. The user simply snaps the code with their smart phone camera, and they will be taken directly to the relevant page on the Lenovo service website.

Lenovo ThinkStation PX design As Lenovo’s flagship ‘Sapphire Rapids’ desktop workstation, it’s hardly surprising that the ThinkStation PX has the most impressive chassis. The build quality is superb, arguably the best we’ve seen in any workstation. The solid metal chassis has handles built into all four corners. It feels incredibly strong. And it certainly needs to be. Our test machine was heavy enough with a single GPU, single PSU and no Hard Disk Drives (HDDs). Carrying a ThinkStation PX around is a two-person job. Lifting it into a rack could be an Olympic sport.

The ThinkStation PX is primarily a desktop workstation, but it’s also been built from the ground up for the datacentre with a rack optimised ‘5U’ design. Bolt holes are hidden under a removable top cover, making it easy to deploy in a standard 19-inch rack with the optional sliding rack rail kit.

For resiliency and redundancy, the machine comes with an optional second

rear hot-swappable 1,850W power supply unit (PSU), so should one PSU fail, the machine will carry on working.

There’s also a rear accessible power button and lockable front access hot swap storage, which includes options for both 3.5-inch Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid State Drives (SSDs). Up to two SSDs can also be mounted on the motherboard but will be hidden under a GPU in multi GPU configs.

Alongside the front drive bays, you’ll find the power button, headphone jack, LCD diagnostics display, two USB Type A and two USB Type C ports, which light up when powered on. This this is a big plus to stop you scrabbling around in the dark.

There are plenty more ports at the rear – 6 x USB Type A and 1 x USB Type C, along with two RJ45 Ethernet ports - 1GbE and 10GbE. There’s also an optional Intel AX210 WIFI PCIe Adapter with antennas built into the top of the chassis.

Inside, the system is essentially split into two distinct sections with the motherboard offset from the side. Above the motherboard you’ll find CPU, memory and GPUs. Beneath the motherboard is storage and power supply units (PSUs).

The beauty of this design is that the components that generate the most heat enjoy uninterrupted airflow from front to back. And considering that a fullyspecced ThinkStation PX can house up to two 350W Intel Xeon Platinum CPUs, up to four 300W Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation GPUs and up to 2TB of DDR5 memory spread across 16 DIMMs, it certainly needs all the help it can get.

To optimise thermals, Lenovo uses a tri-channel cooling system. Fresh air is drawn in through the ‘3D Hexperf’ front grill, the design of which was inspired by Aston Martin’s iconic DBS grand tourer.

But it’s not just for looks. The spacing and shape of the rigid plastic grille, which has rounded spikes that protrude at the front, is optimised for maximum airflow.

The engineering star of the show is the redesigned ABS plastic air baffle, that acts as a wall of separation between the trichannel cooling system’s three distinct zones. Each zone is fed by its own fans — the idea being that you don’t get any pre-heated air from the CPUs going into the GPUs and vice versa. The baffle also separates the CPUs and brings a different channel of fresh air to each as well as the memory DIMMs. Despite the close attention to thermal engineering, the ThinkStation PX is not a silent machine. Fan noise was quite noticeable when rendering or solving Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) problems using both Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H processors. But this is hardly May / June 2023

WS15

29/05/2023 07:20

workstation special report

surprising, as it drew 1,000W at the socket. Still, compared to a rack mounted server it’s an oasis of calm.

The ThinkStation PX scores very highly on serviceability with tool-free access on everything bar the CPUs. It’s not only one of the most beautifully engineered workstations we’ve ever seen; it also feels like everything has been manufactured to very low tolerances. This starts with the side panel which can be removed easily with a simple press and pull of the stylish flush handle. The panel effortlessly clicks back into place, which can’t be said of many desktop workstations.

All serviceable components are signposted with red touch points, from the replaceable fans with blind mate connectors and the PSU(s) at the rear, to brackets that hold the GPUs in place and levers to ease out the hard drive caddies.

Aston Martin’s Cathal Loughnane reckons you don’t need a user manual. We wouldn’t go that far, but it’s certainly intuitive.

Lenovo ThinkStation P7 design From the outside the ThinkStation P7 looks like a slimmed down version of the PX. It’s the same height, but not as deep or wide (4U, for racks). This means there are no front accessible drive bays, and all interior components are located on one side of the motherboard – CPU and memory in the middle, GPUs either side and PSU and HDD caddies at the bottom.

An air baffle channels cool air directly over the CPU, while both 4 DIMM memory banks have their own cooling fan units which clip off.

As the front CPU fans only need to cool a single Intel Xeon W-3400 series processor, they are much smaller than those used on the ThinkStation PX. And, it seems, they don’t have to work as hard.

When rendering in KeyShot, for example with the single Intel Xeon w9-3495X processor, the machine was remarkably quiet, even though it drew 530W at the

For redundancy, The PX can be configured with a second hotswappable PSU

WS16

May / June 2023

WS14_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Lenovo.indd 16

socket. And it can do this for The ThinkStation P7 number of cores, the Intel Xeon hours on end. In Keyshot 2023, and PX (pictured) can W-3400 boasts higher Turbo be rack mounted for example, when rendering clock speeds, so will outperform a multi-frame animation on all 56-cores, the ThinkStation PX in general system fan noise remained constant, and the CPU operations and in workflows that can’t maintained a steady 2.85 GHz. take advantage of more than 56-cores.

The P7 follows the same design ethos as CAD is a classic single threaded the PX with red touch points throughout. application and in Solidworks 2022 the You don’t get quite the same level of ThinkStation P7 had a clear lead over serviceability, however. Once you clip the PX in everything but rendering. This out the cooling fans, for example, you lead also extended to reality modelling in must still disconnect the cables from the MetaShape Pro (photogrammetry) and motherboard.

Leica Cyclone 360 (point cloud processing).

Elsewhere the chassis shares many of But in such single threaded or lightly the same features as the PX – rear power threaded workflows, the ThinkStation button, built in WiFi, dual Ethernet, etc.

P7 can’t hit the same heights as Lenovo’s mainstream workstations. The Lenovo ThinkStation P7 / PX in action ThinkStation P360 Ultra with 12th Gen Lenovo lent us a ThinkStation P7 and Intel Core i9-12900K outperformed ThinkStation PX. These are pre-production the ThinkStation P7 by a considerable units, so they may be slightly different margin. And this lead should grow even to the final shipping workstations. bigger with the P360 Ultra’s successor, Performance, for example, may increase the ThinkStation P3 Ultra, which features with BIOS updates, so our benchmark 13th Gen Intel Core processors. results should not be treated as gospel.

But CAD users — at least those The core specs can be seen below. who only use CAD — are not really the intended audience for Lenovo’s Lenovo ThinkStation P7 ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstations. The • Intel Xeon w9-3495X CPU real beneficiaries will be those that have • 256 GB (8 x 32) DDR5 4,800MHz memory workflows that either benefit from a) • 4 x Nvidia RTX A4000 GPU (16 GB) lots of cores, such as ray trace rendering • 2 TB Samsung PM9A1 SSD or simulation, b) from high memory • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for bandwidth, such as Computational Fluid workstations Dynamics (CFD), or c) just use colossal datasets that need lots of memory.

Lenovo ThinkStation PX Of course, these are also workflows • 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H CPUs that are ideal for the AMD Ryzen • 256 GB (16 x 16) DDR5 4,800MHz memory Threadripper Pro 5000WX Series, the • Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Gen GPU (48 GB) processor at the heart of the Lenovo • 2 TB Samsung PM9A1 SSD ThinkStation P620.

• Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for While we don’t have benchmark workstations figures for that specific machine, we do have them for another 64-core AMD CPU workflows Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX-based The ThinkStation P7 is built around the workstation, the Scan 3XS GWP-ME new workstation-specific Intel Xeon A1128T workstation.

W-3400 Series processors, supporting We found the Scan workstation up to 56-cores in a single socket. While (64-core Threadripper Pro 5995WX) it can’t match the ThinkStation PX for outperformed the ThinkStation P7 www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:20

workstation special report

Lenovo ThinkStation P7

Lenovo ThinkStation PX

Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra

Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T

CPU

Intel Xeon w9-3495X

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

GPU

4 x Nvidia RTX A4000 GPU (16 GB)

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation (48 GB)

Nvidia T400 (4 GB)

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation (48 GB)

Memory

256 GB DDR5 4,800MHz

256 GB DDR5 4,800MHz

64 GB DDR5-4800

256 GB (8 x 32GB) ECC Registered DDR4 3200MHz

Primary storage

2 TB Samsung PM9A1 SSD

2 TB Samsung PM9A1 SSD

1 TB NVMe SSD

2TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe 4.0

OS

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for workstations

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for workstations

Windows 10 Pro

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Price (Ex VAT)

£POA

£POA

£POA

£16,666 (Ex VAT)

Benchmarks (score) (bigger is better) SPECworkstation 3.1 WPCcfd

14.80

24.96

N/A

13.11

robiniaCFD

13.61

30.14

N/A

6.77

Calculix

5.47

6.77

N/A

8.79

CPU ray trace

10.32

16.88

4.29

12.84

CPU rebuild

1.62

1.35

2.15

1.53

CPU convert

1.56

1.11

2.01

1.41

CPU simulate

1.60

1.40

1.32

1.55

CPU mass properties

1.19

1.17

2.20

1.67

Solidworks Professional 2022 (SPECapc)

CPU Boolean

1.12

1.05

1.78

1.35

Graphics (AA, shaded, edges) (4K)

2.23

2.54

0.28

2.59

Graphics (AA, shaded, edges, RealView) (4K)

2.48

4.47

0.32

4.50

47,056

95,937

16,427

59,982

58,796

84,920

22,691

70,286

9.15

16.65

2.75

12.36

V-Ray 5.0 CPU benchmark Cinebench R23 Multi-core KeyShot 11.3.1 benchmark CPU test

Benchmarks (frames per second) (FPS) (bigger is better) Enscape 3.1 Enscape 3.1 architectural project (4K)

44.25

118.6

6.05

124.95

Car Configurator model (4K)

23.84

64.5

N/A

61.86

Car Configurator model (Ray Tracing) (4K)

12.80

39.4

N/A

37.16

Unreal Engine 4.26

Benchmarks (time - seconds) (smaller is better) Leica Cyclone Register 360 Point cloud registration (large dataset)

1,509 (runs on 6 threads)

1,772 (runs on 6 threads)

1,145 (runs on 5 threads)

1,356 (runs on 6 threads)

Rock model

159

215

N/A

157

School Map

706

1,230

N/A

617

102.63

78.52

308.23

85.93

74.54

116.21

N/A

89.82

MetaShape Pro

Unreal Engine 4.26 Recompile Shaders (Car Configurator) Solidworks 2023 IGES export test

www.AECmag.com

WS14_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Lenovo.indd 17

May / June 2023

WS17

29/05/2023 07:20

workstation special report

(56-core Xeon w9-3495X) in all of our rendering benchmarks – V-Ray, KeyShot, Blender and Cinebench. Here the additional eight cores and higher all-core frequencies appear to make a big difference.

In Cinebench for example, Scan’s Threadripper Pro 5995WX maintained a 3.05 GHz Turbo, while Lenovo’s Xeon w9-3495X peaked at 2.54 GHz. Of course, frequencies cannot be compared directly, as both processors deliver different Instructions Per Clock (IPC).

There was a different story with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), testing the WPCcfd and rodiniaCFD workloads in the SPECworkstation 3.1 benchmark. The ThinkStation P7 had a small lead with WPCcfd and a substantial lead with rodiniaCFD. Here, we think Sapphire Rapids’ superior memory bandwidth gives it an advantage as it is able to feed its cores much quicker. While both AMD and Intel processors feature 8-channel memory, Intel has DDR5 4,800MHz which is much faster.

As one might expect, with 120 cores to play with, the ThinkStation PX had quite a considerable lead in both our rendering and CFD benchmarks.

We explore ‘Sapphire Rapids vs Threadripper Pro’ in more detail in the article on page WS4.

in Solidworks Visualize with the 3ds Stellar rendering engine it finished a 4K resolution 1,000 pass render in 81 seconds and a 100-pass render with denoising in a mere 8 seconds. In KeyShot, with denoising enabled, it rendered our bike scene at 8K resolution with 128 samples in 24 secs.

The ThinkStation P7 was configured rather differently, with four Nvidia RTX A4000 GPUs, each with 16 GB of memory. The obvious use case for this setup is virtualisation where the ThinkStation P7 could be carved up into four Virtual Machines (VMs) each with their own dedicated GPU. The four GPUs could also be put to work in a single workstation, and we found enough collective power there to edge out a single Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation in V-Ray, even though the Nvidia RTX A4000 is built on Nvidia’s older ‘Ampere’ architecture. With the

GPU workflows Of course, the ThinkStation P7 and PX offer much more than just ‘Sapphire Rapids’ processors.

They can also host multiple highperformance Nvidia pro GPUs, up to the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation (read our review on page WS24).

The main difference between the two machines is that the PX can support four double height GPUs or eight single height GPUs, whereas the ThinkStation P7 can support three double height or six single height.

Our ThinkStation PX came loaded with a single Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation GPU. This is an incredibly powerful GPU for pro viz workflows with 48 GB of memory to handle colossal datasets. We got incredibly smooth graphics in our real-time viz tests with very high frame rates at 4K resolution in Enscape (118 FPS) and in Unreal Engine with the Audi Car Configurator model (64.5 FPS / 39.4 FPS with Ray tracing disabled / enabled).

Not surprisingly, it also delivered incredible scores in our GPU ray tracing benchmarks (KeyShot, V-Ray and, Blender). To provide some context of what this might mean for day-to-day workflows, WS18

May / June 2023

WS14_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Lenovo.indd 18

ThinkStation P7 interior

Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Generation GPU, which should launch later this year, we would expect a considerable performance uplift, probably more memory per GPU, and four GPUs to still cost less than a single Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada. Of course, in a single workstation setup there are two big downsides to spreading all that GPU power across multiple boards – a) you’ll mostly only be able to harness the power of one of those GPUs for real-time visualisation, and b) the size of datasets will be limited by the memory capacity of a single board.

Conclusion

seems to have added real value.

The big question for many AEC firms is whether ‘Sapphire Rapids’ is the right workstation platform for them? Or might they be better off with AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro, available in the Lenovo ThinkStation P620.

Much of this depends on workflows.

Our tests show that the ThinkStation P7 with 56-core Intel Xeon w9-3495X wins out in single threaded software, such as CAD, and those that are typically heavily bottlenecked by memory bandwidth such as CFD. But the 64-core Threadripper Pro 5995WX offers significantly better performance for rendering, thanks in part to its additional eight cores.

Meanwhile, the ThinkStation PX with its dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H processors sits top of tree in all our highly multi-threaded tests, but at $17,000 per processor it feels the market for this level of performance will be quite limited. Plus, you must take a substantial hit in single threaded workflows.

Of course, ‘Sapphire Rapids’ for Lenovo’s workstations is not just about these top-end processors.

For the ThinkStation P7, Lenovo offers a total of seven Intel Xeon W-3400 processors, ranging from 12 to 56 cores, compared to five for the Threadripper Pro 5000 WX-Series, so customers may find sweet spots where Intel wins out on price/performance.

The options for the ThinkStation PX feel more limited, with lower core Intel Xeon Scalable processors competing with higher core count Intel Xeon W-3400 Series processors in the ThinkStation P7. Such configs may become more attractive when customers want to load up the workstation with four double height GPUs and don’t necessarily need tonnes of CPU performance.

Finally, it’s important to state that the ThinkStation P7 and PX are much more than just desktop workstations. By making them easily rack mountable, and offering server grade remote management and serviceability, they also give AEC firms the flexibility to support staff wherever they need to work.

Importantly, Lenovo’s ’hybrid cloud workstation’ approach means AEC firms can manage the transition to hybrid working at their own pace, without having to jump in with both feet when investing in a centralised datacentre workstation resource.

Lenovo has done an incredible job with its ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstations. The aesthetic design, functional design and build quality of the ThinkStation P7 and (in particular) the ThinkStation PX, is simply incredible. Partnerships with leading brands often feel very surface Learn more about Intel ‘Sapphire Rapids’ in our level, but the one with Aston Martin in-depth article on page WS4. www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:20

Power. Performance. Productivity.

Get pro-grade performance with workstations custom-designed for advanced workflows—such as 3D modeling, rendering, and simulation—and software applications to help you stay productive.

Professional performance

Customize and upgrade

Design in real time with the power of high-performance workstations configured with professional GPUs, advanced CPUs, and large memory configurations.

Configure to meet your advanced workflow needs today, with room to add or swap components as your project complexity grows.

ISV certified

Reliability

Certified with leading software applications to ensure peak performance.

Our workstations undergo military-standard testing,1 plus up to 360K additional hours of testing.

LEARN MORE

© Copyright 2023 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.

1. MIL-STD testing is not intended to demonstrate fitness for U.S. Department of Defense contract requirements or for military use. Test results are not a guarantee of future performance under these test conditions. Accidental damage requires an optional HP Accidental Damage Protection Care Service.

workstation special report

Intel Xeon ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation round up Our top picks of single socket Intel Xeon W-2400 / W-3400 Series and 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable workstations — desktop and rack

HP Z4, Z6, Z8 & Z8 Fury G5 HP has four ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstations, the most out of all the major vendors. Like Lenovo, it is also looking to blur the boundaries between desktop and datacentre, introducing several features more commonly found in servers, with a view to minimising downtime and enhancing system management. This includes hot swappable M.2 SSDs, redundant PSUs and the HP Anyware Remote System Controller to help IT managers better manage workstation fleets – desktop, rack and hybrid.

The HP Z4 G5 features Intel Xeon W-2400 Series (up to 24-cores), and up to two dual slot GPUs. The HP Z6 G5 features the Intel Xeon W-3400 Series from 12 to 36 cores (not including the flagship 56-core model) and three dual slot GPUs. The HP Z8 G5 features ‘Sapphire Rapids’ fourth generation Xeon Scalable processors, but only up to 32 cores, and two dual slot GPUs. The HP Z8 Fury G5 supports the whole range of Intel Xeon W-3400 Series CPUs (up to 56-cores) and up to four dual slot GPUs. ■ www.hp.com/zworkstations

Boxx Apexx W3 / W4 & Raxx W3 Boxx’s ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation family is split neatly into three machines: the desktop Xeon W-2400 Apexx W3, the desktop Xeon W-3400 Apexx W4 (which can also be rack mounted), and the dedicated 3U rack, the Raxx W3, which features liquid cooled Xeon W-3400 processors.

The Apexx W3 can host two double slot GPUs, up to the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation, while the Apexx W4 and Raxx W3 can have four.

■ boxx.com

WS20

May / June 2023

WS20_21_AEC_MAYJUNE23_SR-roundup.indd 20

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:32

workstation special report

Scan 3XS Render Pro X6 Scan uses its expertise as a custom workstation manufacturer to offer something different to most others. Its Intel Xeon W-3400 Series-based 3XS Render Pro X6 makes the GPU the star of the show. It packs six Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090s into a Corsair 1000D chassis to create a massively powerful desktop workstation for GPU rendering.

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 is a triple slot card out of the box, but Scan has stripped it down to single slot with a custom water cooler to keep thermals under control.

Scan also offers a more standard ‘Sapphire Rapids’ workstation. The 3XS Custom GWP 4677 features Intel Xeon W-2400 Series CPUs and dual GPUs up to the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

■ www.scan.co.uk/3xs

Dell Precision 5860 Tower , 7960 Tower & 7960 Rack For its ‘Sapphire Rapids’ desktops, Dell has taken a different approach to HP and Lenovo. It has focused exclusively on Intel’s single socket workstation processors - the Xeon W-2400 (Precision 5860 Tower) and W-3400 (Precision 7960 Tower) - ignoring the server-focused 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable altogether. However, with these two machines, Dell should have most bases covered in AEC, especially with the Precision 7960 supporting 4 GPUs on top of its 56-cores.

4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable still gets a look-in with the datacentre-focused dual socket Precision 7960 Rack. While on paper this 2U machine offers much greater user density compared to HP and Lenovo’s 4U / 5U offerings, it can only support up to two GPUs (whereas the Lenovo ThinkStation PX can support up to four), so those with more demanding GPU-centric workflows may lose out or have to use two machines instead of one, which will likely add to costs.

■ www.dell.com/precision

Workstation Specialists WS IXW-W7900 & WS IXW-W7901 UK firm Workstation Specialists offers two ‘Sapphire Rapids’ desktop workstations which differ largely by the number of GPUs they can support.

The WS IXW-W7901 offers up to four double slot cards up to the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation, while the WS IXW-W7900 offers three.

Interestingly, on paper the WS IXW-W7901 should be able to do this with both Intel Xeon W-2400 and W-3400 Series processor options. This is in contrast to most workstation manufacturers who only offer four double slot GPUs with the more expensive Intel Xeon W-3400 Series processors.

So if your workflows are CPU light and GPU heavy, then configuring the WS IXW-W7901 with the entry-level Intel Xeon w3-2423, for example, could give you the power you need for GPU rendering without spending money on a high core count, high memory bandwidth CPU you don’t need.

■ www.workstationspecialist.com

www.AECmag.com

WS20_21_AEC_MAYJUNE23_SR-roundup.indd 21

May / June 2023

WS21

29/05/2023 07:33

workstation special report

Scan 3XS 3XS GWP-ME A1128T With an Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation professional GPU and 64-core Threadripper Pro CPU, this monster desktop workstation packs a serious punch for the most demanding design viz workflows

F

or its latest high-performance workstation, Scan has combined two of the most powerful workstation-class processors out there — the 64-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX CPU and the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation GPU. Coupled with 256 GB of DDR4 memory and an ultra-fast 8TB SSD RAID 0 array, this machine will likely be the envy of most design viz artists.

Given that the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation is fresh off the production line (read our review on page WS24), it is arguably the silicon star of this workstation. With 48 GB of GDDR6 memory, the ultra-high-end GPU is well equipped to handle the most demanding viz datasets, both in real time 3D and ray tracing / path tracing.

It absolutely obliterated many of the benchmark records set by its predecessor, the Nvidia RTX A6000 (48 GB) (read our

WS22

May / June 2023

WS22_23_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Scan.indd 22

review www.tinyurl.com/AECan automatic improvement in Product spec RTXA6000). The biggest gains 3D frame rates either, as most were seen in GPU ray tracing real time viz tools are not multi■ AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro where the third generation RT GPU aware.

5995WX CPU cores really come into their own, With so much processing (2.7 GHz, 4.5 GHz boost) (64-cores, outperforming the Ampere power available through the 128 threads) Generation GPU by a factor of GPU, it’s easy to forget there’s ■ Nvidia RTX 6000 1.93, 2.05, and 2.19 respectively also a monster Threadripper Pro Ada Generation GPU (48 GB) in the V-Ray, KeyShot, and 5995WX CPU at your disposal.

■ 256 GB (8 x 32GB) blender benchmarks. This is Rendering is an obvious Samsung ECC Registered DDR4 a phenomenal generation on beneficiary of the 64-core CPU 3200MHz memory generation increase. but that’s also a job that the RTX ■ 2TB Samsung It’s no slouch in real time 3D 6000 Ada Generation does 990 Pro NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD either. In Unreal Engine 4.26 exceptional well.

■ 8TB RAID array we saw frame rates with our Viz users often have well (4 x 2TB Samsung Audi Car Configurator model defined rendering pipelines that 990 Pro NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDs) increase by 1.50 and 1.41 times focus on either CPU or GPU and ■ Asus Pro WS respectively with ray tracing not necessarily both. That’s not WRX80E Sage SE enabled and disabled. The always the case, of course. While WiFi motherboard performance increase rose to 1.63 V-Ray has entirely different ■ Corsair H150i Elite Cappelix RGB with in arch viz tool Enscape 3.1, and render engines for GPU and Noctua fans also 1.63 in high-end automotive CPU and users tend to stick ■ 1,500W Corsair HXi, 80PLUS viz software Autodesk VRED to one, Solidworks Visualize Platinum PSU Professional 2023. can use both concurrently, and ■ Microsoft To boost performance further, KeyShot allows you to easily Windows 11 Pro the Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T swap between GPU and CPU ■ ■ 3 Years – 1st Year Onsite, 2nd and can take a second RTX 6000 as and when required. This 3rd Year RTB (Parts Ada Generation GPU, but at could be to help free up compute and Labour) warranty £7,149 (Ex VAT) per card, you’ll resources in order to focus on ■ £16,666 (Ex VAT) need seriously deep pockets. other workflows, such as real ■ scan.co.uk/3xs This should cut ray trace render time 3D, video editing or video times significantly (by up to encoding. Unreal Engine also half), but you won’t get a 96 GB has different compute-intensive pool of memory to play with like you would processes that run on CPU and GPU. with two Nvidia RTX A6000s. Nvidia has CPU rendering also has the benefit dropped support for NVlink. Don’t expect of being able to work with incredibly

www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 16:18

workstation special report

large datasets and with 256 GB of system memory (8 x 32 GB Samsung ECC Registered DDR4 3200MHz) the Scan workstation is certainly well equipped.

With a default TDP of 280W, the Threadripper Pro 5995WX is one of the more challenging CPUs to cool. Scan uses a 360mm Corsair H150i Elite Cappelix RGB hydrocooler mounted in the Fractal Design Meshify 2 case and has replaced the fans with more efficient Noctua models.

This gives enough thermal headroom to increase all core frequencies above the base 2.70 GHz, peaking at 3.05 GHz in both Cinebench and KeyShot 2023.

It’s not the best Threadripper Pro implementation we’ve seen. The Armari Magnetar M64TPRW1300G3 (read our review in AEC Magazine’s January /February 2023 Workstation Special Report), with its custom All-in-One (AIO) cooler, manages to hit 3.38 GHz in Cinebench and 3.45 GHz in KeyShot, outperforming the Scan machine by a factor of 1.05 in Cinebench and KeyShot and even more in V-Ray (1.1).

Both processors pump out some serious heat and that’s hardly surprising considering how much power they draw. When rendering in Cinebench (CPU) we recorded 474W at the socket, 550W with V-Ray GPU, and a whopping 740W when using both processors in Solidworks Visualize. The machine was fairly noisy when CPU rendering, less so when GPU rendering.

The chassis is Scan’s trademark Fractal

Design Meshify 2 with 3XS custom front panel. It’s a little on the large side (542 x 240 x 474 mm), but is solid and well-built and has a ready supply of ports. Up front and top, there are two USB 3.2 Type A and one USB 3.2 Type C, with plenty more at the rear (eight USB Type-A and two USB 3.2 Type C). For networking there two superfast 10GbE NICs and WiFi 6 built in.

The Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T has some other tricks up its sleeve. While the 2TB Samsung 990 Pro SSD system drive is standard fare for workstations these days, the project drive certainly is not.

The ultra-fast 8TB RAID 0 array is built using four 2TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDs mounted on an ASUS Hyper M.2 PCIe add-in card, and delivers phenomenal sequential read / write speeds. In CrystalDiskMark we recorded 24.6 GB/s read and 24.8 GB/s write, compared to 7.4 GB/s and 6.8 GB/s on a single 2TB Samsung 990 Pro. This all sounds great on paper, but the reality is there are only certain workflows that will benefit from such fast storage and only in certain conditions. This includes engineering simulation (with gigantic datasets that don’t fit entirely into system memory), or video editing (with colossal, super high-resolution files). There may be more, and we’d love to learn what they are.

We did see a small benefit over a single SSD when copying files. A zipped file containing 90 GB of point cloud scan data delivered the biggest speed up, with

the RAID 0 array finishing 35% faster.

The same uncompressed dataset (7,414 scans) was 25% faster, a 3ds max dataset (60 large scene files and 4,400 smaller materials, totalling 4.6 GB) was 24% faster and a Revit dataset (68 files, totalling 4.6 GB) was 11% faster.

Of course, the downside of RAID 0 is it introduces multiple points of failure, so should one drive fail all data is lost. It makes regular backups more important than ever.

The verdict The Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T is a serious workstation for design viz professionals, with buckets of processing power for all different workflows, from real-time to ray trace rendering, video editing and beyond.

But it also comes with a serious price tag.

If £16,666 (Ex VAT) seems a lot more than you’re used to paying for a machine of this type, that’s because it probably is.

The price of a Threadripper Pro CPU has increased significantly, and the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation costs considerably more than its predecessor did at launch.

But that’s the current reality of super high-end workstation hardware. Both AMD (CPU) and Nvidia (GPU) have had little in the way of competition in recent times. But with Intel’s long-awaited ‘Sapphire Rapids’ Xeon W-3400 Series CPUs (see page WS4) and AMD’s Radeon Pro W7800 and W7900 GPUs (see page WS28) out now this could change.

Scan Cloud workstations Scan is best known for its desktop machines, but the Bolton-based firm also has a dedicated cloud workstation division that offers systems with Nvidia virtual GPUs (vGPUs) hosted in iomart datacentres in the UK. Customers have a choice of pre-configured vGPU instances, available to rent on a monthly subscription.

Alternatively, customers can go down to a granular level, selecting different vCPU, RAM, vGPU and storage options through an online configurator — in much the same way one would spec out a desktop workstation.

Customers get real time

www.AECmag.com

WS22_23_AEC_MAYJUNE23_Scan.indd 23

feedback on the monthly rental price, then add to the basket when happy.

While this shopping basket approach is a great way to understand the costs of components most new customers will likely call Scan’s Cloud workstation division for advice. Here they can help size vGPU instances based on the applications used and types of models created.

Building a relationship in this way can also get you a free ‘Proof of Concept’ trial.

Each vGPU instance comes pre-loaded with Windows 10. However, the OS is unlicensed

— the idea being that customers can save money by using their own Windows 10 corporate licences.

Ubuntu is also available.

Scan also points out that

there is no charge for uploading or downloading data, which is not the case with hyperscale public cloud providers.

■ www.scan.co.uk/business/scan-cloud

May / June 2023

WS23

31/05/2023 16:18

workstation special report

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

ew GPU architectures are delivered from the top down.

And the new Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation is very much at the top of the stack. With a price tag of £7,150 (Ex VAT), this 48 GB professional GPU is reserved for those that take design visualisation, simulation or AI extremely seriously.

The first thing to get out of the way is the name of this new workstation-class GPU. It is built on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture, named after the English Mathematician credited with being the first computer programmer.

Recently, Nvidia has used a single letter prefix for its pro GPUs — P for Pascal, T for Turing, A for Ampere, and so on.

As ‘A’ was already taken, Nvidia initially referred to the Ada Lovelace GPU as the Nvidia RTX 6000, but soon after tagged ‘Ada Generation’ on to the end, presumably to avoid confusion with 2018’s Turing-based Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000.

We don’t know why Nvidia didn’t use an ‘L’ prefix as it has done for its ‘Ada Lovelace’ datacentre GPUs (the Nvidia L4 and L40), but this is where we are

at now. The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada It could also limit its use in engineering Generation might be a bit of a mouthful, simulation, including Computational Fluid but at least it has a clear identity.

Dynamics (CFD).

48 GB is still double that on offer in The workstation card the top-end consumer Nvidia GeForce The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 40-Series. The RTX 6000 Ada is a dual slot, full height, PCIe 4.0 also differentiates itself from Nvidia’s workstation GPU with four DisplayPort consumer cards in several other ways, 1.4a connectors. It looks virtually including pro drivers, pro software identical to its predecessor, the Nvidia certifications, support for Error RTX A6000, and has a minimal angular Correction code (ECC) memory, and some black and gold design. The radial type fan niche features for pro viz, including stereo blows hot air directly out of the rear of the and Frame Lock for viz clusters. workstation via the grille on the bracket.

It also supports Nvidia virtual The total board power is 300W, which GPU (vGPU) software, which allows is less than its triple slot ‘Ada Lovelace’ a workstation to be repurposed into consumer counterparts — the Nvidia multiple GPU-accelerated virtual GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce RTX workstation instances. With workstation 4080. Power is delivered via a single PCIe vendors, especially Lenovo and HP, CEM5 16-pin connector. actively making their new ‘Sapphire The card has a phenomenal amount Rapids’ desktop workstations rack of processors: 142 third-gen RT Cores friendly, this feature is likely to be more for ray tracing (delivering 211 TFLOPs), important than ever before.

568 fourth-gen Tensor Cores for AI Finally, it boasts 3x the video encoding compute (delivering 1,457 TFLOPs), and performance of the Nvidia RTX A6000, 18,176 next-gen CUDA cores for general for streaming multiple simultaneous XR purpose operations, boasting 91 TFLOPs sessions using Nvidia CloudXR. of single precision performance. This is a significant jump up from the Nvidia RTX Optimised for visualisation A6000 it replaces, which delivers RT The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada offers all the Core performance of 76 TFLOPs, Tensor generational improvements you’d expect performance of 310 TFLOPs, and single- from a new GPU architecture, but there precision performance of 39 TFLOPS. are also significant changes in the way the The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada comes with GPU carries out calculations to increase 48 GB of GDDR6 memory, which should performance in viz-centric workflows. be plenty for most viz-centric workflows.

Deep Learning Super Sampling 3 (DLSS) However, unlike its predecessor, the RTX and Shader Execution Reordering (SER) 6000 Ada Generation does not support are the two technologies that stand out.

NVLink, so two GPUs cannot be bridged Nvidia DLSS has been around for together with an adapter to create a 96 GB several years and with the new Nvidia memory pool. While this shouldn’t matter RTX 6000 Ada, it is now on its third to most users, it could be a barrier for those generation. It uses the GPU’s AI Tensor working with exceptionally high poly cores to boost performance. count models / high resolution textures.

With Nvidia’s previous generation

Enscape 3.1 (Vulkan)

Autodesk VRED Professional 2022 (OpenGL)

Enscape 3.1 sample project

Automotive model (No Anti Aliasing)

One can’t deny the breathtaking performance of Nvidia’s new flagship workstation GPU and its potential to completely transform viz workflows, but some will find the price offputting Price £7,150 + VAT www.nvidia.com | www.pny.com

N

4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

1.23

Nvidia RTX A6000

76.75

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

124.95 30

60

90

1.23

Nvidia RTX A6000

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation 0

4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

120

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

93.45

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

150

177.12 0

50

100

150

200

Autodesk VRED Professional 2022 (OpenGL) Automotive model (Anti Aliasing - Ultra-high) 4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

1.23

Nvidia RTX A6000

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

23.75

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation 0

WS24

May / June 2023

WS24_25_26_27_AEC_MAYJUNE23_RTX6000.indd 24

38.80 5

10

15

20

25

30

35

‘‘

The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a phenomenally powerful GPU. In several visualisation workflows, it delivered more than double the performance of the previous generation Nvidia RTX A6000

’’

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:30

workstation special report

The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation features an elegant dual slot design

‘Ampere’ GPUs, DLSS 2 took a lowresolution current frame and the highresolution previous frame to predict, on a pixel-by-pixel basis, what a highresolution current frame would look like.

With DLSS 3, the Tensor cores generate entirely new frames rather than just pixels. It processes the new frame, and the prior frame, to discover how the scene is changing, then generates entirely new frames without having to process the graphics pipeline.

So far, we’ve only seen DLSS 3 implemented in Nvidia Omniverse, but we expect others to follow. Enscape and Autodesk VRED, for example, both support DLSS 2.

As a background to Shader Execution Reordering (SER), Nvidia explains that GPUs are most efficient when processing similar work at the same time. However, with ray tracing, rays bounce in different directions and intersect surfaces of various types. This can lead to different threads processing different shaders or accessing

memory that is hard to coalesce or cache.

With SER, the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation can dynamically reorganise its workload, so similar shaders are processed together. According to Nvidia, SER can give a two to three times speed up for ray tracing and a frame rate increase of up to 25%. But these are probably extremes.

For offline path tracing in Unreal Engine 5.1, for example, Nvidia quotes speed improvements of 40% or more.

Unreal Engine 4.26 (DirectX 12 - DXR)

Unreal Engine 4.26 (DirectX 12 - rasterisation)

Audi car configurator model (ray tracing enabled)

Audi car configurator model (ray tracing disabled)

4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

1.23

Nvidia RTX A6000

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

24.73

Nvidia RTX A6000

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

37.16 0

5

10

15

20

memory bandwidth (960 GB/s vs 768 GB/s). According to Ansys, this results in ‘impressive performance gains’ for the broad Ansys application portfolio.

However, the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada is not suited to all simulation tools. Some simulation solvers require double precision and with relatively poor FP64 performance (which at 1,423 GFLOPSs is 1/64 of its FP32 performance), the RTX 6000 Ada is unlikely to perform that well in those that do. In fact, for double precision solvers, Engineering simulation even 2016’s Nvidia Quadro GP100 boasts In AEC, while visualisation is the primary better FP64 performance of 5.17 TFLOPs. use case for the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada, the GPU can also be used for engineering Testing the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada simulation.

AEC Magazine put the Nvidia RTX At launch, Nvidia highlighted the 6000 Ada Generation through a series use of Ansys software, including of real-world application benchmarks, Ansys Discovery and Ansys Fluent for both GPU rendering and real time Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). visualisation.

Compared to the RTX A6000, the The GPU is simply overkill for current RTX 6000 Ada not only has more cores generation CAD and BIM software, so and faster cores, but significantly larger we didn’t do any testing in that regard.

L2 cache (96 MB vs 6 MB) and increased However, it’s important to note that it

25

30

1.23

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

43.60

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

35

61.86 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Nvidia Omniverse Create 2022.3.3

Brownstone building - RTX - Real-Time mode with DLSS enabled 4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

Nvidia RTX A6000

(DLSS 2)

19.28

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

(DLSS 3)

0

www.AECmag.com

WS24_25_26_27_AEC_MAYJUNE23_RTX6000.indd 25

1.23

10

20

30

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

Nvidia Omniverse Create 2022.3.3 Brownstone building RTX – interactive (path tracing) 4K (3,840 x 2,160 resolution)

1.23

Nvidia RTX A6000

40

69.8 50

60

70

Frames Per Second (FPS) (bigger is better)

2.93

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

6.32 0

1

2

May / June 2023

3

4

5

6

7

WS25

29/05/2023 07:30

workstation special report

will still be certified for the likes of Revit and Archicad, which is useful if you plan to use those types of core applications alongside viz focused tools like Enscape, V-Ray, Twinmotion and Lumion.

The full spec of our AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro test machine, the Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T can be seen below.

You can read a full review on page WS22.

(path tracing) mode the RTX 6000 Ada was 2.16 times faster.

Real time 3D visualisation with applications that use OpenGL, DirectX or Vulkan graphics APIs continue to be a very important part of architectural visualisation. Key applications include TwinMotion, Lumion, Enscape and Unreal Engine.

We recorded frame rates (Frame Per Second) within Enscape, Unreal Engine, Nvidia Omniverse, and Autodesk VRED Professional, a pro viz application

commonly used in automotive design.

We only tested at 4K (3,840 x 2,160) resolution. At FHD (1,920 x 1,080) , it’s a given that the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation can deliver more than enough performance.

In Enscape, we tested with five different models. Overall, our experience was incredibly smooth, even with the large RTX-enabled Enscape 3.0 building complex which uses 11 GB of GPU memory (see picture right).

However, our preferred benchmark model, an urban scene from Enscape 3.1, was a little unresponsive, sometimes taking a few seconds to react to mouse or keyboard movements. We don’t know why this was, but it could be because it includes custom assets and textures and there is a conflict of some sort. Once it got going, however, we recorded a phenomenal 124.95 FPS, 63% faster than the Nvidia RTX A6000.

In Unreal Engine 4.26, the generationon-generation gains were smaller. The biggest increase came when ray tracing was enabled on our Audi test model, with the RTX 6000 Ada Generation delivering 1.5 times more FPS than the RTX A6000.

In Autodesk VRED Professional 2023, performance increases ranged from 1.63 to 1.89. The biggest came when antialiasing was disabled.

In Nvidia Omniverse Create 2022.3.3, we tested with the Brownstone building sample model. In RTX - Real-Time mode with DLSS enabled the RTX 6000 Ada was a whopping 3.62 times faster than the RTX A6000. However, there’s a case of comparing apples with pears here as the RTX 6000 Ada uses DLSS 3 while the RTX A6000 use DLSS 2 (see earlier on). In saying that, we saw no visual difference between the two. In RTX – interactive

Chaos Group V-Ray 5.0 benchmark

Luxion KeyShot 11.3.1 benchmark (GPU)

Luxion KeyShot 2023

Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T • AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX processor (2.7 GHz, 4.5 GHz boost) (64-cores, 128 threads) • 256 GB (8 x 32GB) Samsung ECC Registered DDR4 3200MHz memory • 2TB Samsung 990 Pro PCIe 4.0 SSD • 8TB RAID array (4 x 2TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDs) • Asus Pro WS WRX80E Sage SE WiFi motherboard • Corsair H150i Elite Cappelix RGB with Noctua fans • 1,500W Corsair HXi, 80PLUS Platinum • Microsoft Windows 11 Pro For comparison, we also tested the Nvidia RTX A6000 GPU inside the same machine. Nvidia’s 528.24 pro driver was used for both GPUs.

Real time 3D

Ray trace rendering We tested with a range of GPUaccelerated ray-trace renderers, including V-Ray GPU, KeyShot, Solidworks Visualize, Nvidia Omniverse and blender.

With the V-Ray, KeyShot and blender benchmarks, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation shot ahead, outperforming the RTX A6000 by a factor of 1.93, 2.05 and 2.17 respectively. We saw similar gains in Nvidia Omniverse, with the RTX 6000 Ada taking less than half the time of the RTX A6000 to render the brownstone building scene.

However, in some of our real-world application tests, the gains were nowhere near as large. In Solidworks Visualize 2023, rendering the 1969 Camaro test scene with Nvidia Iray and the new 3DS Stellar Physically Correct global illumination engine, showed the RTX 6000 Ada to be between 32% and 40% faster than the RTX A6000.

In KeyShot 2023 the RTX 6000 Ada Generation rendered our motorbike model between 33% and 41% quicker in a range of stills and turntable animations.

With KeyShot ‘s sample drone scene it went down to 23%-25%.

Conclusion The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a phenomenally powerful GPU. In several visualisation workflows, it delivered more than double the performance of the previous generation Nvidia RTX A6000. And when Nvidia has full control over both software and hardware, and the GPU’s fourthgen Tensor cores kick in with DLSS 3, the boost in real-time performance

V-Ray GPU RTX

Drone model animation render

1.23 vrays (calculations per minute) (bigger is better)

1.23 Relative performance to reference system (bigger is better)

775 frames 1,600 x 900 resolution

Nvidia RTX A6000

Nvidia RTX A6000

Nvidia RTX A6000

2,729

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

5,277 0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

91.4

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

6000

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

Render time (mins) (smaller is better)

443 mins 14 secs

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

187.4 0

1.23

377 mins 56 secs 0

100

200

300

400

500

Luxion KeyShot 2023

Open Blender benchmark 3.4

Bike model turntable animation render 1.23 Benchmark score (monster + junkshop + classroom)

601 frames, 4K, 128 samples, denoise 4K (3,840 x 1,080 resolution)

Nvidia RTX A6000

Nvidia RTX A6000

5,769

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

12,528 0

WS26

3000

6000

9000

May / June 2023

WS24_25_26_27_AEC_MAYJUNE23_RTX6000.indd 26

12000

15000

1.23

Render time (mins) (smaller is better)

86 mins 56 secs

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

57 mins 38 secs 0

20

40

60

80

100

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:30

workstation special report

Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Nvidia is having a staggered roll out of its Nvidia RTX Ada Lovelace GPUs for desktop workstations. Following on from the ultra-high-end Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation, which launched at the tail end of 2022, Nvidia has now released a second desktop GPU designed specifically for compact workstations with form factors like those of the HP Z2 SFF, HP Z2 Mini, Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra, Dell Precision 3460 SFF and Dell Precision 3260 Compact.

The GPU will likely be of interest to users of CAD or BIM software who want to extend their workflows into visualsation, VR and simulation with tools like Enscape, Twinmotion, Lumion, V-Ray, Omniverse and more.

The Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation features 20 GB of graphics memory, nearly double that of its predecessor, the Nvidia RTX A2000

(12 GB), and is said to offer a 2x performance improvement. It also offers greater memory bandwidth, so it can transfer data to and from its memory more quickly. According to Nvidia, this results in improved graphics, compute and rendering performance.

The Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF is a low-profile, double height graphics card, which takes up two slots on the motherboard. It has four mini DisplayPort1.4a connectors.

The GPU is designed to operate with PCIe slot power alone and has a max power consumption of 70W. This is significantly lower than previous ‘4000’ class GPUs, which

(with seemingly no impact on end user experience) is simply breathtaking.

But these are the extremes of what you can expect from this super high-end workstation GPU. In some of our real world tests the performance increases were as low as 23%. But even this can save hours in the working day. When rendering out a 600 frame 4K animation in KeyShot for example, render times dropped from 6 hours 26 mins to 4 hours 50 mins.

There are some downsides to the new GPU. First, there is no NVLink, which may come as a disappointment to those really pushing the boundaries of complexity. Second it is quite power hungry, drawing 300W at peak. And finally, of course, there’s the price.

‘‘

When Nvidia has full control over both software and hardware, and the Tensor cores kick in with DLSS 3, the boost in real-time performance (with seemingly no impact on end user experience) is simply breathtaking

www.AECmag.com

’’

WS24_25_26_27_AEC_MAYJUNE23_RTX6000.indd 27

typically draw up to 140W. However, Nvidia confirmed that, in the future, it will also launch a standard Nvidia RTX 4000 GPU that can take advantage of 140W in a single slot. We expect

include 6,144 CUDA parallel processing cores, 192 Nvidia Tensor Cores and 48 Nvidia RT Cores. Nvidia quotes 19.2 TFLOPs single precision performance, 44.3 TFLOPs RT Core performance, and 306.8 TFLOPS Tensor core performance.

This is significantly more than the Nvidia RTX A2000 (8.0 TFLOPs, 15.6 TFLOPS and 63.9 TFLOPS respectively).

And while single precision performance and RT core performance is very close to the 140W Nvidia RTX A4000, Tensor performance for AI operations has doubled.

The Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF GPU costs around $1,250, and will be available from workstation manufacturers later this year.

both GPUs will be share the same silicon, but the Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF will be clocked lower.

Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF specs

£7,150 (Ex VAT) is an incredible amount to pay for a single graphics card and considerably more than Nvidia previously charged for its top end workstation GPUs. The Nvidia RTX A6000, for example, only cost £3,730 (Ex VAT) in February 2021.

While some will consider £7,150 to be a price worth paying for the transformative effect it could have on their workflows, others may seek better value elsewhere.

The new AMD Radeon Pro W7900 (48 GB) is one such option (see page 28), although it does not currently offer the same breadth of software support.

More than ever, perhaps Nvidia is facing its biggest competition from itself.

The consumer-focused ‘Ada Generation’ GeForce RTX 4090 comes in around

£1,500, but you miss out on some pro features, superior build quality and access to 48 GB of memory, double that of the 4090. And for some viz artists that’s a big deal. 48 GB allows you to work with more complex datasets and render them at higher resolutions. In simulation, engineers can increase the fidelity of the solver for more accurate results.

The additional memory will not just offer potential benefits for single app workflows.

These days many viz artists to use multiple apps at the same time - render in V-Ray while working on real-time experiences in Unreal Engine, for example. And the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is much more likely to allow them to do this without having to compromise their workflow or output.

Solidworks Visualize 2023 SP0.1 (Iray)

Solidworks Visualize 2023 SP0.1 (3ds Stellar)

1969 Camaro car model

1969 Camaro car model

1,000 passes, accurate quality 4K (3,840 x 1,080 resolution)

1.23

Render time (secs) (smaller is better)

Nvidia RTX A6000

1,000 passes, accurate quality 4K (3,840 x 1,080 resolution)

136

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation 30

60

90

120

Render time (secs) (smaller is better)

Nvidia RTX A6000

87

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

81 0

1.23

150

59 0

20

40

60

80

100

Nvidia Omniverse Create 2022.3.3 Brownstone building - path tracing 3,000 passes 4K (3,840 x 1,080 resolution)

1.23

Render time (secs) (smaller is better)

Nvidia RTX A6000

1,036

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation

471 0

200

400

May / June 2023

600

800

1000

1200

WS27

29/05/2023 07:30

workstation special report

Preview: AMD Radeon Pro W7800 / W7900 AMD’s new RDNA 3 pro graphics cards target price / performance to take the fight to Nvidia and its RTX 6000 Ada Generation, writes Greg Corke Price $2,499 (W7800) / $3,999 (W7900) www.amd.com/radeonpro

I

t’s been a while coming, but AMD has finally delivered its new professional graphics cards, built on the same RDNA 3 architecture of its consumer Radeon RX 7900 Series, which launched in December 2022. We say ‘delivered’ but AMD is not quite there yet. Our review cards missed the deadline for this Workstation Special Report by a matter of days.

The new boards — the Radeon Pro W7900 and Radeon Pro W7800 — target workflows including visualisation, real-time 3D, ray trace rendering, photogrammetry, VR, simulation, video editing, compositing and more. But with pro driver optimisations and certifications they can also be used for CAD and BIM. The AMD Radeon Pro W7900 is a triple (2.5) slot GPU with 48 GB of GDDR6 memory, 61 TFLOPs of peak single precision performance and a total board power of 295W. It costs $3,999.

The AMD Radeon Pro W7800 is a dual slot GPU with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, 45 TFLOPs of peak single precision performance and a total board power of 260W. It costs $2,499.

Both GPUs comprise multiple unified RDNA 3 compute units, each with 64 dual issue stream processors, two AI accelerators and a second gen ray tracing (RT) accelerator. According to AMD, RDNA 3 offers up to 50% more raytracing performance per compute unit than the previous generation.

Optimised ray tracing For ray tracing, the new GPUs are compatible with Unreal Engine, Unity, WS28

May / June 2023

WS28_AEC_MAYJUNE23_AMD.indd 28

Lumion, Enscape, Solidworks Visualise, D5 Render, Maxon Redshift, plus other applications that support DirectX Raytracing (DXR), Vulkan ray tracing, or AMD Radeon ProRender, including Acca Edificius, Autodesk Inventor, Rhino, Autodesk Maya, and Blender (Cycles X).

This list should grow. AMD is also working with other software developers to help convert their existing Nvidia CUDA applications to run on the new GPUs and other AMD hardware. This is being done through AMD’s open-source toolset HIP (Heterogeneous-Compute Interface for Portability), which includes a ray tracing library, HIP RT, so developers can take advantage of the dedicated ray accelerators in AMD’s GPUs. The new GPUs will go up against the 48 GB Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation (read our

the latest version of the digital display standard which offers three times the data rate of DisplayPort 1.4. According to AMD, this means its new GPUs are future proofed for next gen displays in terms of refresh rate, pixel resolution and colour bit-depth, while pointing out that the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports DisplayPort 1.4.

Both the AMD Radeon Pro W7800 and W7900 feature three DisplayPort 2.1 and one Mini DisplayPort 2.1 connectors, a change from the previous generation Radeon Pro W6800 with six Mini DisplayPort 1.4.

Memory boost

With 48 GB, the Radeon Pro W7900 also marks a step up in terms of memory, with 50% more than its predecessor, the Radeon Pro W6800, putting it on par with the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Memory is becoming increasingly important for viz workflows, not just to support extremely complex high-polygon datasets, but for multi-tasking as well, as product designer, Dr. Adi Pandzic, Ph.D, explains, “Large format renders require more horsepower, especially when doing 4K raytraced animations using [Solidworks] Visualize. The Radeon Pro W7900 allows me to easily keep working on the model review on [in Solidworks CAD] while rendering in page WS24). the background.”

While AMD Rich Hurrey, president, founder, only names two Kitestring, shares similar experiences, benchmarks where the “The increased memory that the new Radeon Pro W7900 will AMD RDNA 3 GPUs offer, allows us to outpace Nvidia’s have multiple instances of Maya, flagship pro GPU (the Modo, and Unreal Engine open 3ds Max and Maya viewsets at the same time. All of this in SPECviewperf 2020), means that production work gets it points out that both done faster and in real time.”

AMD GPUs are extremely Memory also differentiates competitive on price / the new GPUs from AMD’s performance. consumer focused RDNA 3 GPU, In SPECviewperf 2020 the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX GeoMean, for example, which has 24 GB. Both pro GPUs AMD claims the Radeon Pro also come with AMD Software: W7900 is within 7% of the Pro Edition. This offers pro performance of the Nvidia software certifications for RTX A6000 Ada Generation ‘performance and stability’, and but offers more than double pro features such as ViewPort the price/performance, as it Boost, which dynamically AMD Radeon costs less than half as much adjusts viewport resolution Pro W7800 ($3,999 vs $8,615). to boost performance, remote AMD also highlights workstation support and more. support for DisplayPort 2.1, Look out for a review soon. www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 14:16

Building Information Modelling (BIM) for Architecture, Engineering and Construction

Technology for BIM and beyond

register. aecmag.com

Subscribe free Join our online community twitter.com/AECmagazine

AEC AD WEBSITE A4 V2.indd 2

linkedin.com/company/aec-magazine

facebook.com/AECmag

05/09/2022 16:52

workstation special report

Cloud workstations In-depth for CAD, BIM technical report and visualisation How the major public cloud providers stack up Using Frame, the Desktop-as-a-Service (DaaS) solution, we test 23 GPU-accelerated ‘instances’ from Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure, in terms of raw performance and end user experience by greg corke

I

f you’ve ever looked at public cloud software. There is very little information The ‘system performance’ is what one workstations and been confused, in the public domain, and certainly none might expect if your monitor, keyboard, you’re not alone. Between Amazon that compares performance and price of and mouse were plugged directly into the Web Services (AWS), Google multiple VMs from multiple providers cloud workstation. It tests the workstation Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft using real world applications and datasets, as a unit – and the contribution of CPU, Azure, there are hundreds of different and also captures the end user experience.

GPU and memory to performance. instance types to choose from. They also So, with the help of Ruben Spruijt For this we use many of the same real have obscure names like g4dn.xlarge or from Frame, the hybrid and multi-cloud world application benchmarks we use NC16asT4v3, which look like you need a Desktop-as-a-Service (DaaS) solution, and to test desktop and mobile workstations code to decipher. independent IT consultant, Dr. Bernhard in the magazine. For BIM (Autodesk Things get even more Revit), for CAD (Autodesk confusing when you dial Inventor), for real-time down into the specs. Whereas visualisation (Autodesk While benchmarking helps us understand desktop workstations for VRED Professional, Unreal sale tend to feature the the relative performance of different VMs, it Engine and Enscape), and latest and greatest, cloud and GPU rendering doesn’t consider what happens between the CPU workstations offer a variety (KeyShot and V-Ray). datacentre and the end user of modern and legacy CPU But with cloud and GPU architectures that workstations ‘system span several years. Some of performance’ is only one the GCP instances, for example, offer Intel Tritsch, getting answers to these questions part of the story. The DaaS remote display ‘Skylake’ CPUs that date back to 2016! is exactly what we set out to achieve in this protocol and its streaming capabilities at Gaining a better understanding of in-depth AEC Magazine article. different resolutions, network conditions cloud workstations through their specs – or what happens between the cloud is only the first hurdle. The big question There are two main aspects to testing workstation in the datacentre and the for design, engineering, and architecture cloud workstation VMs. client device – also play a critical role in firms is how each virtual machine (VM) the end user experience. This includes performs with CAD, Building Information 1. The workstation system performance. latency, which is largely governed by Modelling (BIM), or design visualisation 2. The real end user experience. the distance between the public cloud

‘‘

’’

WS30

May / June 2023

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 30

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 06:56

|G

FRAME | NVIDIA | INTEL | AMD | GOOGLE | AWS

E AM R |F

A IDI V |N

E| UR AZ FT SO MI CR O

| AW S| GLE GO O | AM D| TEL | IN NV IDI A E|

FR AM E|

| INTEL | AMD | G VIDIA OOG N | E L

S|M AW

E AM R F FR

A IDI N| V

| IN

| TEL

D AM

O | GO

GL

S |E AW

OS CR I |M

OF

T

U AZ

AM

PROFILE

| EL INT a| idi | Nv OFT AZURE | FR ME A ICROS M E | N FRA V

A IDI

RE

workstation special report

|

D|

AM LE

OG

GO S| | AW TA

OF

OS

CR

MI RE

ZU WS31

29/05/2023 06:56

a|

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 31

May / June 2023

idi Nv

www.AECmag.com

CPU (frequency, measured in GHz) is the number of clock cycles it can complete in one second. At time of testing, none of the cloud providers offered the new 4th Gen AMD EPYC ‘Genoa’ or ‘Sapphire Rapids’ Intel Xeon processors.

Here it is important to explain a little bit about how CPUs are virtualised in cloud workstations. A vCPU is a virtual CPU created and assigned to a VM and is different to a physical core or thread. A vCPU is an abstracted CPU core delivered by the virtualisation layer of the hypervisor on the cloud infrastructure as a service (IaaS) platform.

It means physical CPU resources can be overcommitted, which allows the cloud workstation provider to assign more vCPUs than there are physical cores or threads. As a result, if everyone sharing resources from the same CPU decided to invoke a highly multi-threaded process such as ray trace rendering all at the same time, they might not get the maximum theoretical performance out of their VM. It should also be noted that a processor can go into ‘turbo boost’ mode, which allows it to run above its base clock speed to increase performance, typically when

E|

AM

| FR

end user’s browser to VMs in any of the three public clouds.

The testing was conducted at 30 Frames Per Second (FPS) in both FHD (1,920 x 1,080) and 4K (3,840 x 2,160) resolutions. Networking scenarios tested included high bandwidth (100 Mbps) with low latency (~10ms Round Trip Time (RTT)) and low bandwidth (ranging between 4, 8, and 16 Mbps) and higher The cloud workstations latency (50-100ms RTT) using networkWe tested a total of 23 different public controlled emulation. cloud workstation instances from AWS, CPU (Central Processing Unit) GCP, and Microsoft Azure.

Workstation testing with real-world Most of the VMs feature AMD EPYC applications is very time intensive, so CPUs as these tend to offer better we hand-picked VMs that cover most performance per core and more cores bases in terms of CPU, memory, and GPU than Intel Xeon CPUs, so the public cloud resources. providers can get more users on each of VMs from Microsoft Azure feature their servers to help bring down costs.

Microsoft Windows 10 22H2, while AWS Different generations of EPYC and GCP use Microsoft Windows Server processors are available. 3rd Gen AMD 2019. Both operating systems support EPYC ‘Milan’ processors, for example, not most 3D applications, although Windows only run at higher frequencies than 2nd 10 has slightly better compatibility.

Gen AMD EPYC ‘Rome’ processors but For consistency, all instances were deliver more instructions per clock (IPC). orchestrated and accessed through N.B. IPC is a measure of the number of the Frame DaaS platform using Frame instructions a CPU can execute in a single Remoting Protocol 8 (FRP8) to connect the clock cycle while the clock speed of a datacentre and the end user, bandwidth, utilisation, packet loss, and jitter.

For end user experience testing we used EUC Score (www.eucscore.com), a dedicated tool developed by Dr. Bernhard Tritsch that captures, measures, and quantifies perceived end-user experience in virtual applications and desktop environments, including Frame. More on this later.

workstation special report

thermal conditions allow. However, with cloud workstations, this information isn’t exposed, so the end user does not know when or if this is happening.

One should not directly compare the number of vCPUs assigned to a VM to the number of physical cores in a desktop workstation. For example, an eight-core processor in a desktop workstation not only comprises eight physical cores and eight virtual (hyper-threaded) cores for a total of 16 threads, but the user of that desktop workstation has dedicated access to that entire CPU and all its resources.

GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) In terms of graphics, most of the public cloud instance types offer Nvidia GPUs. There are three Nvidia GPU architectures represented in this article - the oldest of which is ‘Maxwell’ (Nvidia M60), which dates back to 2015, followed by ‘Turing’ (Nvidia T4), and ‘Ampere’ (Nvidia A10).

Only the Nvidia T4 and Nvidia A10 have hardware ray tracing built in, which makes them fully compatible with visualisation tools that support this physics-based rendering technique, such as KeyShot, V-Ray, Enscape, and Unreal Engine.

At time of testing, none of the major public cloud providers offered Nvidia GPUs based on the new ‘Ada Lovelace’ architecture. However, GCP has since announced new ‘G2’ VMs with the ‘Ada Lovelace’ Nvidia L4 Tensor Core GPU. Most VMs offer dedicated access to one or more GPUs, although Microsoft Azure has some VMs where the Nvidia A10 is virtualised, and users get a slice of the larger physical GPU, both in terms of processing and frame buffer memory.

AMD GPUs are also represented.

Microsoft Azure has some instances where users get a slice of an AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 GPU. AWS offers dedicated access to the newer AMD Radeon Pro V520. Both AMD GPUs are relatively lowpowered and do not have hardware ray tracing built in, so should only really be considered for CAD and BIM workflows.

Storage Storage performance can vary greatly between VMs and cloud providers. In general, CAD/BIM isn’t that sensitive to read/write performance, and neither are our benchmarks, although data and back-end services in general need to be close to the VM for best application performance.

In Azure the standard SSDs are significantly slower than the premium SSDs, so could have an impact in workflows that are I/O intensive, such as simulation (CFD), point cloud processing or video editing. GCP offers particularly fast storage with the Zonal SSD PD, which, according to Frame, is up-to three times faster than the Azure Premium SSD solution. Frame also explains that AWS with Elastic Block Storage (EBS) has ‘very solid performance’ and a good performance/price ratio using EBS GP3.

particular, it is important that all data is stored in the same datacentre as the cloud workstations, or deltas are synced between a few select datacentres using global file system technologies from companies like Panzura or Nasuni.

Pricing For our testing and analysis purposes, we used ‘on-demand’ hourly pricing for the selected VMs, averaging list prices across all regions.

A Windows Client/Server OS licence is included in the rate, but storage costs are not. It should be noted that prices in the table below are just a guideline. Some companies may get preferential pricing from a single vendor or large discounts through multi-year contracts.

Performance testing

Our testing revolved around three key workflows commonly used by architects Cloud workstation regions and designers: CAD / BIM, real-time All three cloud providers have many visualisation, and ray trace rendering. regions (datacentres) around the world and most instance types are available CAD/BIM in most regions. However, some of the While the users and workflows for CAD newest instance types for example, such and Building Information Modelling as those from Microsoft Azure with new (BIM) are different, both types of software AMD EPYC ‘Milan’ CPUs, currently have behave in similar ways. Most CAD and limited regional availability.

BIM applications are largely single For testing, we chose regions in threaded, so processor frequency and IPC Europe. While the location of the region should be prioritised over the number of should have little bearing on our cloud cores (although some select operations workstation ‘system performance’ testing, are multi-threaded, such as rendering and which was largely carried out by AEC simulation). All tests were carried out at Magazine on instances in the UK (AWS) FHD and 4K resolution. and The Netherlands (Azure/GCP), it could have a small impact on end user Autodesk Revit 2021: Revit is the experience testing, which was all done by number one ‘BIM authoring tool’ used by Ruben Spruijt from Frame from a single architects. For testing, we used the RFO v3 location in The Netherlands.

2021 benchmark, which measures three In general, one should always try to largely single-threaded CPU processes – run virtual desktops and applications update (updating a model from a previous in a datacentre that is closest to the end version), model creation (simulating user, resulting in low network latency modelling workflows), export (exporting and packet loss. However, firms also raster and vector files), plus render (CPU need to consider data management. For rendering), which is extremely multiCAD and BIM-centric workflows in threaded. There’s also a graphics test.

What is Frame? The Desktop-as-a-Service (DaaS) solution

Frame is a browser-first, hybrid and multi-cloud, Desktop-as-a-Service (DaaS) solution.

Frame utilises its own proprietary remoting protocol, based on

WS32

WebRTC/H.264, which is well-suited to handling graphics-intensive workloads such as 3D CAD. With Frame, firms can deliver their Windows ‘office productivity’, videoconferencing, and high-performance 3D graphics applications to users on any device with just a web browser – no client or plug-in required.

The Frame protocol delivers audio and video streams from the VM, and

May / June 2023

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 32

keyboard / mouse events from the end user’s device. It supports up to 4K resolution, up to 60 Frames Per Second (FPS), and up to four monitors, as well as peripherals including the 3Dconnexion SpaceMouse, which is popular with CAD users.

Frame provides firms with flexibility as the platform supports deployments natively in AWS, Microsoft Azure, and GCP as well as on-premise on Nutanix

hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI).

Over 100 public cloud regions and 70 instance types are supported today, including a wide range of GPUaccelerated instances (Nvidia and AMD).

Everything is handled through a single management console and, in true cloud fashion, it’s elastic, so firms can automatically provision and de-provision capacity on-demand.

■ https://fra.me

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

a lot of GPU resources, both in terms of All RFO benchmarks are measured in Real-time visualisation The role of real-time visualisation in processing and memory. We tested our seconds, so smaller is better. design-centric workflows continues automotive model with AA set to ‘off’, Autodesk Inventor 2023: Inventor is one to grow, especially among architects ‘medium’, and ‘ultra-high’, recording FPS. of the leading mechanical CAD (MCAD) where tools like Enscape, Twinmotion applications. For testing, we used the and Lumion are used alongside Revit, Unreal Engine 4.26: Over the past few InvMark for Inventor benchmark by Archicad, SketchUp and others. The GPU years Unreal Engine has established itself Cadac Group and TFI (https://invmark.cadac. requirements for real time visualisation are as a very prominent tool for design viz, especially in architecture and automotive. com), which comprises several different much higher than they are for CAD/BIM. Performance is typically measured in It was one of the first applications to use sub tests which are either single threaded, only use a few threads concurrently, or use frames per second (FPS), where anything GPU-accelerated real-time ray tracing, lots of threads, but only in short bursts. above 20 FPS is considered OK. Anything which it does through Microsoft DirectX Rendering is the only test that can make less and it can be hard to position models Raytracing (DXR).

For benchmarking we used the use of all CPU cores. The benchmark also quickly and accurately on screen.

Automotive Configurator summarises performance by collating all There’s a big benefit from Epic Games, which single-threaded tests into a single result to working at higher features an Audi A5 and all multi-threaded test into a single resolutions. 4K reveals Frame convertible. The scene was result. All benchmarks are given a score, much more detail, but automatically tested with DXR enabled where bigger is better. places much bigger demands on the GPU adapts to network and disabled (DirectX 12 Ray-trace rendering rasterisation).

– not just in terms of conditions to The tools for physically-based rendering, graphics processing, but maintain Benchmark findings a process that simulates how light GPU memory as well. 8 behaves in the real world to deliver GB should be an absolute interactivity. EUC For CAD and BIM photorealistic output, have changed a lot minimum with 16 GB or Score not only in recent years. The compute intensive more needed for larger frequency (GHz) gives you a visual Processor process was traditionally carried out datasets, especially at 4K is very important for reference to this performance in CAD and

by CPUs, but there are now more and resolution.

Real time visualisation more tools that use GPUs instead. GPUs BIM software. However, compression by tend to be faster, and more modern relies on graphics APIs recording the user as mentioned earlier, you rasterisation, a GPUs feature dedicated processors for for can’t directly compare experience, but it different processor types ray tracing and AI (for ‘denoising’) to rendering method for 3D quantifies the accelerate renders even more. CPUs still software that takes vector by frequency alone. have the edge in terms of being able to data and turns it into For example, in Revit amount of handle larger datasets and some CPU pixels (a raster image).

2021 and Inventor 2023 the compression Some of the more renderers also offer better quality output.

2.45 GHz AMD EPYC 7V12 being applied For ray trace rendering, it’s all about the modern APIs like Vulkan – Rome (Azure NV8as_ time it takes to render. Higher resolution and DirectX 12 include v4) performs better than renders use more memory. For GPU real-time ray tracing. the 2.6 GHz Intel Xeon rendering, 8 GB should be an absolute This isn’t necessarily at the same quality E5-2690v3 – Haswell (Azure NV6_v3 minimum with 16 GB or more needed for level as dedicated ray trace renderers like & Azure NV6_v3) because it has a more V-Ray and KeyShot, but it’s much faster. modern CPU architecture and can execute larger datasets.

For our testing we used three relatively more Instructions Per Clock (IPC).

Chaos Group V-Ray: V-Ray is one of heavy datasets, but don’t take our FPS The 3.2 GHz AMD EPYC 74F3 – the most popular physically-based scores as gospel. Other datasets will be Milan processor offers the best of both rendering tools, especially in architectural less or more demanding. worlds – high frequency and high IPC visualisation. We put the VMs through thanks to AMD’s Zen 3 architecture. It their paces using the V-Ray 5 benchmark Enscape 3.1: Enscape is a real-time makes the Azure NvadsA10 v5-series (www.chaosgroup.com/vray/benchmark) using visualisation and VR tool for architects that (NV6adsA10_v5 / Azure NV12adsA10_v5 V-Ray GPU (Nvidia RTX) and V-Ray CPU. uses the Vulkan graphics API and delivers / Azure NV36adsA10_v5) the fastest cloud The software is not compatible with AMD very high-quality graphics in the viewport. workstations for CPU-centric CAD/BIM It supports ray tracing on modern Nvidia workflows, topping our table in all the GPUs. Bigger scores are better. and AMD GPUs. For our tests we focused single threaded or lightly threaded Revit Luxion KeyShot: this CPU rendering on rasterisation only, measuring real-time and Inventor tests. stalwart, popular with product designers, performance in terms of FPS using the Taking a closer look at the results from is a relative newcomer to the world of Enscape 3.1 sample project. the Azure NvadsA10 v5-series, the entryGPU rendering. But it’s one of the slickest level NV6adsA10_v5 VM lagged a little implementations we’ve seen, allowing Autodesk VRED Professional 2023: behind the other two in some Revit and users to switch between CPU and GPU VRED is an automotive-focused 3D Inventor tests. This is not just down to rendering at the click of a button. Like visualisation and virtual prototyping tool. having fewer vCPUs – 6 versus 12 (Azure V-Ray, it is currently only compatible with It uses OpenGL and delivers very high- NV12adsA10_v5) and 36 (NV36adsA10_ Nvidia GPUs and benefits from hardware quality visuals in the viewport. It offers v5). It was also slower in some singleray tracing. For testing, we used the several levels of real-time anti-aliasing threaded operations. We imagine there KeyShot 11 CPU and GPU benchmark, part (AA), which is important for automotive may be a little bit of competition between of the free KeyShot Viewer (www.keyshot. styling, as it smooths the edges of body panels. However, AA calculations use com/viewer). Bigger scores are better. ...continued on page WS38 u

‘‘

’’

www.AECmag.com

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 33

May / June 2023

WS33

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

CAD / BIM

Microsoft Azure

Instance / Virtual Machine (VM)

Azure NV6_v3

Azure NV12_v3

Azure NV8as_v4

Azure NV16as_v4

Azure NC4asT4_v3

Azure NC8asT4_v3

Azure NC16asT4_ v3

Azure NV6adsA10_ v5

Azure

Azure

NV12adsA10_ v5

NV36adsA10_ v5

AWS G4ad.XL

AWS G4ad.2XL

AWS G4ad.4

CPU

Intel Xeon E5-2690v3 (Haswell)

Intel Xeon E5-2690v3 (Haswell)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 74F3 (Milan) (Zen 3)

AMD EPYC 74F3 (Milan) (Zen 3)

AMD EPYC 74F3 (Milan) (Zen 3)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EP 7R32 (Ro (Zen 2

CPU Base Clock Speed

2.60 GHz

2.60 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

3.2 GHz

3.2 GHz

3.2 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GH

Max CPU Speed - single-core

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

4.0 GHz

4.0 GHz

4.0 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GH

vCPUs

6

12

8

16

4

8

16

6

12

36

4

8

16

RAM

55 GiB

112 GiB

28 GiB

56 GiB

28 GiB

56 GiB

110 GiB

55 GiB

110 GiB

440 GiB

16 GiB

32 GiB

64 GiB

Storage Type

StandardSSD

StandardSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP

Storage Size

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 G

Nvidia M60

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

Nvidia T4

Nvidia A10 4Q

Nvidia A10 8Q

Nvidia A10 24Q

AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD Rad Pro V5

GPU

Nvidia M60

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T4

GPU memory

8 GB

8 GB

4 GB

8 GB

16 GB

16 GB

16 GB

4 GB

8 GB

24 GB

8 GB

8 GB

GPU Driver

512.78

512.78

22.10.01.11

22.10.01.11

512.78

512.78

512.78

512.78

512.78

512.78

30.0.21001.12042

30.0.21001.12042

30.0.21001.1

8 GB

Operating System

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2

Autodesk Revit 2021 RFO v3 benchmark ( smaller is better) Revit 2021 RFO v3 - update (FHD) (sec)

16.5

14.4

12.7

12.8

12.7

12.4

12.6

9.2

8.8

9.2

12.1

11.3

11.9

Revit 2021 RFO v3 - create (FHD) (sec)

187.8

178.9

160.4

149.4

147.3

141.4

143.6

115.0

101.2

98.5

175.7

155.9

155.3

Revit 2021 RFO v3 - export (FHD) (sec)

546.9

521.0

488.2

455.1

490.9

452.7

455.1

351.2

314.3

316.4

508.0

467.8

456.1

Revit 2021 RFO v3 - Render (FHD) (sec)

143.7

104.9

115.6

61.6

150.1

81.6

47.4

112.6

56.4

27.3

228.0

109.3

60.6

Revit 2021 RFO v3 - Graphics (FHD) (sec)

48.6

46.1

56.5

44.5

41.2

37.5

39.9

37.1

31.0

25.9

52.4

43.3

39.8

Revit 2021 RFO v3 - Graphics (4K) (sec)

58.0

53.5

129.9

62.2

46.8

42.4

41.5

FAIL

60.2

28.8

84.0

70.9

73.4

896

1,136

770

1,000

1,321

961

1,274

1,742

585

895

1170

Autodesk Inventor 2023 Invmark benchmark (score) (bigger is better) Inventor 2023 Invmark - Modelling (FHD)

748

806

Inventor 2023 Invmark- Drawing (FHD)

539

590

577

693

581

755

857

811

1,027

1,194

422

578

663

Inventor 2023 Invmark- FEA

709

724

876

879

869

907

881

1,095

1,101

1,040

768

832

853

Inventor 2023 Invmark - SIM

865

891

539

774

1,259

1,244

1,217

1,384

1,525

1,480

465

674

706

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Graphics (FHD)

1,714

1,736

1,318

1,936

2,251

2,345

2,523

1,988

2,616

2,937

1,265

1,683

1,969

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Graphics (4K)

1,537

1,507

1174

1,609

1,974

2,068

2,136

1,475

2,215

2,450

989

1,473

1,711

Inventor Invmark 2023 - Ray Ttracing

512

765

689

1,382

469

954

1,981

715

1411

3,928

303

655

1,477

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Data Translate

557

580

616

654

620

670

681

865

933

929

534

602

644 676

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Assy Pattern

626

676

558

697

981

988

895

1,256

1,165

1,312

604

688

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Assy Constraint

824

831

572

783

1116

1,148

1,162

1,387

1,450

1,470

703

767

773

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Single Threaded (ST)

7,576

7,942

7,312

8,669

10,164

10,473

10,240

12,236

12,735

12,409

7,186

8,364

8,524

Inventor 2023 Invmark - Multi Threaded (MT)

3,397

4,088

4,012

5,407

3,452

5,064

6,379

4,953

7,068

9,280

2,465

3,914

5,293

Performance / price (normalised) (bigger is better)

1

Price ($ per hour) 1

$1.32

$1.84

$0.94

$1.88

$0.81

$1.24

$2.14

$0.82

$1.63

$5.47

$0.58

$0.82

$1.64

Revit Update Perf / Price - FHD

32.00

26.26

58.51

28.93

67.39

45.13

25.90

92.22

48.35

13.85

100.00

75.00

35.89

Revit Create Perf / Price - FHD

37.91

28.54

62.35

33.47

78.43

53.61

30.58

100.00

56.83

17.44

92.67

73.52

36.98

Revit Export Perf / Price - FHD

39.75

29.93

62.54

33.54

71.87

51.12

29.47

100.00

55.87

16.58

97.86

74.80

38.44

Revit Render Perf / Price - FHD

47.25

46.46

82.52

77.46

73.42

88.55

88.45

97.49

97.22

59.99

68.11

100.00

90.41

Revit Graphics Perf / Price - FHD

47.22

35.65

56.96

36.14

90.38

65.16

35.47

99.88

59.75

21.33

100.00

85.22

46.41

Revit Graphics Perf / Price - 4K

37.53

29.20

23.54

24.60

75.82

54.66

32.36

100.00

29.21

18.28

59.27

49.44

23.92

Inventor ST Perf / Price - FHD

38.32

28.82

51.95

30.79

83.44

56.39

31.95

100.00

52.03

15.15

83.12

68.11

34.77

Inventor MT Perf / Price - FHD

42.45

36.65

70.42

47.45

70.01

67.36

49.17

100.00

71.34

27.99

70.44

78.73

53.35

Inventor Graphics Perf / Price - FHD

46.92

34.09

50.67

37.22

100.00

68.33

42.60

87.92

57.84

19.40

79.19

74.16

43.47

Inventor Graphics Perf / Price - 4K

47.78

33.61

51.26

35.12

100.00

68.43

40.96

73.81

55.62

18.38

70.30

73.71

42.90

Price $/hour. On-demand pricing. Average compute price across all regions. Windows OS License included. Storage costs not included

WS34

May / June 2023

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 34

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS 4ad.2XL

AWS G4ad.4XL

AWS G4dn.XL

AWS G4dn.2XL

MD EPYC 2 (Rome) Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

Intel Xeon 8259

Intel Xeon 8259

(Cascade Lake)

(Cascade Lake)

.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.5 GHz

2.5 GHz

.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

Google Cloud

Desktop workstations

AWS. G4dn.12XL

AWS G5.xl

AWS G5.2xl

AWS G5.4xl

AWS G5.8xl

GCP N1-STD-4GPU-T4

GCP N1-STD-8GPU-T4

HP Z2 Mini G9

Scan 3XS GWP-ME A13C

Armari M64TPRW1300G3

Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T

Intel Xeon 8259

Intel Xeon 8259

(Cascade Lake)

(Cascade Lake)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

Intel Xeon 3647 (Skylake)

Intel Xeon 3647 (Skylake)

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2.5 GHz

2.5 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.0 GHz

2.0 GHz

3.6 GHz

3.0 GHz

2.7 GHz

2.7 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

5.0 GHz

5.8 GHz

4.5 GHz

4.5 GHz

AWS G4dn.4XL

8

16

4

8

16

48

4

8

16

32

4

8

8P - 4E (cores)

8P - 16E (cores)

64 cores

64 cores

32 GiB

64 GiB

16 GiB

32 GiB

64 GiB

192 GiB

16 GiB

32 GiB

64 GiB

128 GiB

16 GiB

30 GiB

32 GB

64 GB

128 GB

128 GB

Zonal SSD PD

NVMe SSD

NVMe SSD

NVMe SSD

NVMe SSD

256 GB

1 TB

2 TB

2 TB

2 TB

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T1000

Nvidia RTX A2000

AMD Radeon Pro W6800

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada

BS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

Zonal SSD PD

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T4 x4

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

56 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

D Radeon o V520

AMD Radeon Pro V520

8 GB

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T4

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia T4

8 GB

16 GB

16 GB

16 GB

16 GB x 4

24 GB

24 GB

24 GB

24 GB

16 GB

16 GB

4 GB

12 GB

32 GB

48 GB

21001.12042

30.0.21001.12042

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

528.24

528.24

511.65

517.4

22.Q3

528.24

ver 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Win11

Win11

Win11

Win11

11.3

11.9

13.4

12.4

11.2

10.7

12.5

12.0

11.0

11.6

13.8

13.2

No data

No data

No data

No data

155.9

155.3

162.1

153.1

140.5

134.5

170.1

157.5

150.4

158.5

187.3

166.1

No data

No data

No data

No data

467.8

456.1

525.7

492.2

515.2

438.7

520.9

477.7

468.4

470.3

566.5

500.8

No data

No data

No data

No data

109.3

60.6

306.6

161.5

77.3

33.7

232.2

109.9

65.8

37.9

334.2

157.8

No data

No data

No data

No data

43.3

39.8

49.6

40.8

34.5

33.3

49.0

40.4

36.7

36.5

55.5

42.0

No data

No data

No data

No data

70.9

73.4

56.4

44.6

40.1

38.4

54.9

43.6

41.1

40.5

50.2

48.8

37.9

16.9

26.2

No data

895

1170

469

727

753

1,356

572

870

1,179

1,386

436

703

1,912

2,307

1,941

No data

578

663

414

613

618

884

453

680

793

865

356

555

1,745

2,166

1,394

No data

832

853

732

760

769

803

725

850

812

840

646

697

1,328

1,473

1,132

No data

674

706

1,000

1,086

1,069

1,194

1,085

1,279

1,264

1,257

842

973

2,171

2,611

1,449

No data

1,683

1,969

1,692

1,999

2,065

2,402

1,698

2,170

2,347

2,340

1,383

1,731

No data

No data

No data

No data

1,473

1,711

1,526

1,777

1,939

2,205

1,580

1,911

2,003

2,024

1,213

1,574

3,389

5,068

2,966

No data

655

1,477

257

528

537

3,210

354

750

1,411

2,837

241

507

2,707

5,706

11,744

No data

602

644

525

583

601

630

529

624

658

656

466

536

1,440

1,743

1,124

No data

688

676

721

759

748

829

762

864

860

918

643

716

1,975

2,327

1,424

No data

767

773

955

1,000

984

1,093

1,023

1,158

1,140

1181

801

889

2,163

2,652

1,701

No data

8,364

8,524

8,626

9,179

9,150

9,811

8,894

10,418

10,162

10,435

7,428

8,339

No data

No data

No data

No data

3,914

5,293

2,207

3,606

3,682

6,829

2672

4367

5,757

6,811

2,002

3,367

No data

No data

No data

No data

$0.82

$1.64

$0.79

$1.23

$2.19

$4.10

$1.23

$1.63

$2.42

$4.01

$1.65

$4.02

-

-

-

-

75.00

35.89

66.12

45.62

28.33

15.92

45.31

35.62

26.06

14.98

30.49

13.14

-

-

-

-

73.52

36.98

73.55

49.82

30.57

17.06

44.95

36.60

25.82

14.78

30.41

14.08

-

-

-

-

74.80

38.44

69.26

47.34

25.45

15.96

44.82

36.85

25.31

15.22

30.70

14.25

-

-

-

-

00.00

90.41

37.10

45.07

53.01

64.85

31.42

50.05

56.34

59.00

16.26

14.13

-

-

-

-

85.22

46.41

77.45

60.22

40.09

22.20

50.26

45.98

34.08

20.66

33.03

17.94

-

-

-

-

49.44

23.92

64.66

52.36

32.75

18.27

42.60

40.44

28.81

17.68

34.69

14.66

-

-

-

-

68.11

34.77

73.08

49.77

27.92

15.99

48.32

42.68

28.04

17.38

30.06

13.85

-

-

-

-

78.73

53.35

46.19

48.30

27.75

27.49

35.86

44.19

39.24

28.02

20.02

13.82

-

-

-

-

74.16

43.47

77.58

58.65

34.10

21.19

49.92

48.10

35.04

21.09

30.29

15.56

-

-

-

-

73.71

42.90

79.45

59.28

36.33

22.08

52.75

48.11

33.82

20.71

30.17

16.07

-

-

-

-

www.AECmag.com

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 35

May / June 2023

WS35

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

Design viz

Microsoft Azure

Instance / Virtual Machine (VM)

Azure NV6_v3

Azure NV12_v3

Azure NV8as_v4

Azure NV16as_v4

Azure NC4asT4_v3

Azure NC8asT4_v3

Azure NC16asT4_ v3

Azure NV6adsA10_ v5

Azure

Azure

NV12adsA10_ v5

NV36adsA10_ v5

AWS G4ad.XL

AWS G4ad.2XL

AWS G4ad.4

CPU

Intel Xeon E5-2690v3 (Haswell)

Intel Xeon E5-2690v3 (Haswell)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7V12 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 74F3 (Milan) (Zen 3)

AMD EPYC 74F3 (Milan) (Zen 3)

AMD EPYC 74F3 (Milan) (Zen 3)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EP 7R32 (Ro (Zen 2

CPU Base Clock Speed

2.60 GHz

2.60 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

2.45 GHz

3.2 GHz

3.2 GHz

3.2 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GH

Max CPU Speed - single-core

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

4.0 GHz

4.0 GHz

4.0 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GH

vCPUs

6

12

8

16

4

8

16

6

12

36

4

8

16

RAM

55 GiB

112 GiB

28 GiB

56 GiB

28 GiB

56 GiB

110 GiB

55 GiB

110 GiB

440 GiB

16 GiB

32 GiB

64 GiB

Storage Type

StandardSSD

StandardSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

PremiumSSD

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP

Storage Size

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 G

Nvidia M60

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

Nvidia T4

Nvidia A10 4Q

Nvidia A10 8Q

Nvidia A10 24Q

AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD Rad Pro V5

GPU

Nvidia M60

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T4

GPU memory

8 GB

8 GB

4 GB

8 GB

16 GB

16 GB

16 GB

4 GB

8 GB

24 GB

8 GB

8 GB

GPU Driver

512.78

512.78

22.10.01.11

22.10.01.11

512.78

512.78

512.78

512.78

512.78

512.78

30.0.21001.12042

30.0.21001.12042

30.0.21001.1

8 GB

Operating System

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Win10 22H2

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2

V-Ray 5.0 Benchmark (bigger is better) V-Ray 5 - CPU

2,594

3,425

3,275

6,288

2,301

4,954

9,533

3,404

7,030

20,283

1,391

3,148

6,441

V-Ray 5 - RTX GPU

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

589

662

734

FAIL

351

1,544

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

Keyshot 11.3.1 - CPU

0.49

0.66

0.64

1.24

0.44

0.89

1.79

0.67

1.32

3.99

0.32

0.66

1.38

Keyshot 11.3.1 - GPU

4.6

4.6

Incompatible

Incompatible

23.5

23.6

24.6

6.6

13.9

52.4

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

KeyShot 11.3.1 Benchmark (bigger is better)

Autodesk VRED Professional 2023 automotive model (frames per second) (bigger is better) VRED Professional 2023 - no AA (FHD)

34.0

34.0

10.1

17.4

65.8

64.7

63.5

19.5

39.7

138.3

51.9

52.7

53.5

VRED Professional 2023 - no AA (4K)

12.1

12.0

7.1

9.1

23.9

23.4

23.5

9.0

18.9

53.1

22.3

20.8

21.1

VRED Professional 2023 - med AA (FHD)

19.6

19.6

4.8

9.4

37.7

37.0

37.9

12.6

25.4

78.1

24.3

23.9

24.4

VRED Professional 2023 - med AA (4K)

7.8

7.8

3.4

4.1

15.9

15.2

14.9

6.4

13.1

35.0

7.8

7.2

7.3

VRED Professional 2023 - ultra high AA (FHD)

9.2

9.2

2.8

4.9

18.2

17.9

17.9

7.5

15.1

41.1

9.6

9.3

9.4

VRED Professional 2023 - ultra high AA (4K)

3.1

3.0

1.9

1.8

6.0

5.9

5.8

FAIL

5.8

15.1

2.7

2.6

2.7

Enscape 3.1 sample project (frames per second) (bigger is better) Enscape 3.1 (FHD)

41.0

42.5

15.4

27.1

74.6

71.7

77.5

2.1

51.5

134.2

55.7

57.6

57.5

Enscape 3.1 (4K)

13.4

14.2

8.5

13.6

30.2

30.5

30.9

FAIL

29.1

55.2

25.3

26.0

26.7

Unreal Engine 4.26 Car Configurator (frames per second) (bigger is better) Unreal Engine 4.26 RT on (FHD)

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

25.1

23.9

24.8

FAIL

FAIL

47.1

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT on (4K)

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

6.6

6.3

6.5

FAIL

FAIL

14.5

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT off (FHD)

26.2

26.5

4.4

18.5

41.1

41.8

40.9

2.6

27.6

88.9

40.9

41.5

41.3

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT off (4K)

7.0

6.6

2.6

5.8

12.4

12.2

12.2

FAIL

6.0

27.1

12.2

12.0

12.5

$1.84

$0.94

$1.88

$0.81

$1.24

$2.14

$0.82

$1.63

$5.47

$0.58

$0.82

$1.64

Performance / price (normalised) (bigger is better) Price ($ per hour) 1

1

$1.32

V-Ray 5 - CPU

40.08

37.96

71.06

68.22

57.69

81.47

90.84

84.97

87.73

75.63

49.14

78.29

80.25

V-Ray 5 - RTX GPU

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

81.13

59.81

38.43

FAIL

24.06

31.63

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

Keyshot 11.3.1 - CPU

41.55

40.15

76.23

73.84

60.55

80.34

93.63

91.80

90.42

81.66

62.06

90.10

94.38

Keyshot 11.3.1 - GPU

7.58

5.43

Incompatible

Incompatible

62.41

41.08

24.81

17.37

18.33

20.66

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

VRED Professional 2023 - med AA (FHD)

20.24

14.56

6.97

6.82

63.24

40.66

24.13

20.96

21.19

19.48

57.32

39.77

20.36

VRED Professional 2023 - med AA (4K)

15.59

11.11

9.41

5.76

51.63

32.24

18.37

FAIL

21.07

16.88

35.43

23.17

11.74

Enscape 3.1 (FHD)

30.06

22.32

15.84

13.94

88.65

55.94

35.00

2.43

30.47

23.73

93.31

67.89

33.97

Enscape 3.1 (4K)

18.88

14.32

16.82

13.45

69.33

45.74

26.85

FAIL

33.11

18.76

81.50

58.96

30.33

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT on (FHD)

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

62.29

38.91

23.38

FAIL

FAIL

17.38

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompat

Incompat

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT on (4K)

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

Incompatible

53.90

33.56

20.09

FAIL

FAIL

17.48

Incompatible

Incompatible

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT off (FHD)

27.99

20.35

6.63

13.93

71.38

47.60

27.01

4.55

23.85

22.98

100.00

71.46

35.62

Unreal Engine 4.26 RT off (4K)

18.33

12.29

9.45

10.69

52.55

33.88

19.67

FAIL

12.57

17.06

72.91

50.48

26.20

Price $/hour. On-demand pricing. Average compute price across all regions. Windows OS License included. Storage costs not included

WS36

May / June 2023

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 36

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS 4ad.2XL

AWS G4ad.4XL

AWS G4dn.XL

AWS G4dn.2XL

MD EPYC 2 (Rome) Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

Intel Xeon 8259

Intel Xeon 8259

(Cascade Lake)

(Cascade Lake)

.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.5 GHz

2.5 GHz

.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

Google Cloud

Desktop workstations

AWS. G4dn.12XL

AWS G5.xl

AWS G5.2xl

AWS G5.4xl

AWS G5.8xl

GCP N1-STD-4GPU-T4

GCP N1-STD-8GPU-T4

HP Z2 Mini G9

Scan 3XS GWP-ME A13C

Armari M64TPRW1300G3

Scan 3XS GWP-ME A1128T

Intel Xeon 8259

Intel Xeon 8259

(Cascade Lake)

(Cascade Lake)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

AMD EPYC 7R32 (Rome) (Zen 2)

Intel Xeon 3647 (Skylake)

Intel Xeon 3647 (Skylake)

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX

2.5 GHz

2.5 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.8 GHz

2.0 GHz

2.0 GHz

3.6 GHz

3.0 GHz

2.7 GHz

2.7 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

5.0 GHz

5.8 GHz

4.5 GHz

4.5 GHz

AWS G4dn.4XL

8

16

4

8

16

48

4

8

16

32

4

8

8P - 4E

8P-16E

64

64

32 GiB

64 GiB

16 GiB

32 GiB

64 GiB

192 GiB

16 GiB

32 GiB

64 GiB

128 GiB

16 GiB

30 GiB

32 GB

64 GB

128 GB

128 GB

BS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

EBS GP3

Zonal SSD PD

Zonal SSD PD

SSD

NVMe

NVMe

NVMe

56 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

256 GB

1 TB

2 TB

2 TB

2 TB

D Radeon o V520

AMD Radeon Pro V520

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T4 x4

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T1000

Nvidia RTX A2000

AMD Radeon Pro W6800

Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada

8 GB

Nvidia T4

Nvidia T4

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia A10G

Nvidia T4

8 GB

16 GB

16 GB

16 GB

16 GB x 4

24 GB

24 GB

24 GB

24 GB

16 GB

16 GB

4 GB

12 GB

32 GB

48 GB

21001.12042

30.0.21001.12042

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

527.41

528.24

528.24

511.65

517.4

22.Q3

528.24

ver 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Server 2019

Win11

Win11

Win11

Win11

3,148

mpatible

0.66

mpatible

6,441

1,211

2,903

6,537

20,090

1,450

3,150

6,445

12,716

1,159

2,408

13,288

26,952

66,461

59982

Incompatible

392

524

583

2,375

1,097

1,323

1,141

1,509

366

507

N/A

1,012

Incompatible

5,277

1.38

0.26

0.50

1.17

3.66

0.30

0.65

1.33

2.75

0.23

0.47

2.67

32.05

N/A

187.45

Incompatible

22.8

23.6

23.3

49.8

57.0

56.8

45.6

57.8

22.4

22.3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

52.7

53.5

63.7

65.3

64.8

64.5

152.9

157.8

157.7

155.8

58.0

57.7

30.7

68.2

44.3

N/A

20.8

21.1

24.2

24.0

24.8

22.9

69.9

70.6

70.5

71.8

24.2

22.2

10.9

25.7

34.1

177.1

23.9

24.4

36.7

36.7

36.7

36.3

90.1

91.8

92.0

93.6

35.2

34.7

16.4

38.2

38.9

N/A

7.2

7.3

15.9

15.6

15.8

14.8

46.6

46.8

46.8

48.0

15.5

14.4

7.0

16.3

26.5

110.2

9.3

9.4

17.8

18.3

17.8

17.8

52.3

52.9

53.0

52.8

17.3

17.1

7.8

18.7

29.0

N/A

2.6

2.7

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.8

20.9

20.9

20.9

21.1

6.0

5.6

N/A

6.4

14.1

38.8

57.6

57.5

75.0

66.7

69.1

70.8

127.1

149.2

139.4

150.1

68.0

67.3

36.7

72.2

40.4

N/A

26.0

26.7

20.8

21.0

21.9

23.6

66.1

65.6

66.5

61.0

26.2

25.6

14.1

26.6

23.4

125.0

mpatible

Incompatible

24.1

24.5

23.2

24.9

60.9

62.3

60.3

60.5

FAIL

23.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

mpatible

Incompatible

6.3

5.8

5.8

6.2

18.7

18.6

19.1

19.3

FAIL

5.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

37.2

41.5

41.3

28.7

39.3

40.1

41.9

73.3

102.4

105.0

107.7

39.2

37.1

13.1

43.3

101.4

N/A

12.0

12.5

10.3

11.6

11.6

11.7

35.7

36.1

35.5

35.8

FAIL

10.1

N/A

12.6

29.1

61.9

$0.82

$1.64

$0.79

$1.23

$2.19

$4.10

$1.23

$1.63

$2.42

$4.01

$1.65

$4.02

-

-

-

-

78.29

80.25

31.34

48.07

60.92

100.00

24.06

39.41

54.31

64.67

14.33

12.22

-

-

-

-

Incompatible

55.72

47.67

29.85

64.95

100.00

90.93

52.82

42.16

51.78

40.62

-

-

-

-

94.38

36.93

45.45

59.85

100.00

27.32

44.64

61.52

76.77

15.60

13.09

-

-

-

-

Incompatible

62.47

41.24

22.94

26.19

100.00

75.13

40.62

31.06

29.21

11.94

-

-

-

-

39.77

20.36

63.58

40.62

22.86

12.09

100.00

76.85

51.89

31.85

29.07

11.78

-

-

-

-

23.17

11.74

53.07

33.36

19.07

9.53

100.00

75.80

50.82

31.57

24.76

9.47

-

-

-

-

67.89

33.97

92.06

52.37

30.51

16.72

100.00

88.49

55.71

36.19

39.83

16.20

-

-

-

-

mpatible

90.10

mpatible

58.96

30.33

49.00

31.79

18.62

10.71

100.01

74.83

50.86

28.29

29.53

11.86

-

-

-

-

mpatible

Incompatible

61.83

40.17

21.36

12.29

100.00

77.22

50.31

30.44

FAIL

11.58

-

-

-

-

mpatible

Incompatible

52.56

31.00

17.26

9.87

99.98

75.14

51.70

31.63

FAIL

9.67

-

-

-

-

71.46

35.62

51.51

45.09

25.86

14.47

84.31

88.80

61.28

37.94

33.53

13.03

-

-

-

-

50.48

26.20

45.06

32.40

18.20

9.83

99.99

76.13

50.24

30.70

FAIL

8.68

-

-

-

-

www.AECmag.com

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 37

May / June 2023

WS37

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

u continued from page WS33

However, with only 32 GB of system memory, those working with the largest Revit models may need more.

As CAD/BIM is largely single threaded, there is an argument for using a 4 vCPU VM for entry-level workflows. AWS G4ad.xlarge, for example, is very cost effective at $0.58 per hour and comes with a dedicated AMD Radeon Pro V520 GPU. However, with only 16 GB of RAM it will only handle smaller models and with only 4 vCPUs expect even more competition between the CAD software, Windows and graphics card driver.

It’s important to note that throwing more graphics power at CAD or BIM software won’t necessarily increase 3D performance. This can be especially true at FHD resolution when 3D performance is often bottlenecked by the frequency of the CPU. For example, AWS G4ad.2xlarge and AWS G5.2xl both feature the same AMD EPYC 7R32 – Rome processor and have 8 vCPU. However, AWS G4ad.2xlarge features AMD Radeon Pro

GPU is essential, and while there are many workflows that don’t need plenty the CAD software, Windows, and the of vCPU, those serious about design graphics card driver (remember 6 vCPUs visualisation often need both. is not the same as 6 physical CPU cores, It’s easy to rule out certain VMs for so there may not be enough vCPUs to run real-time visualisation. Some simply everything at the same time). There could don’t have sufficient graphics power to also possibly be some contention from deliver anywhere near the desired 20 other VMs on the same server.

FPS in our tests. Others may have enough Despite this, the 6 vCPU Azure performance for FHD resolution or for NV6adsA10_v5 instance with 55 GB of workflows where real-time ray tracing is memory still looks like a good choice for not required. some CAD and BIM workflows, especially For entry-level workflows at considering its $0.82 per hour price tag.

FHD resolution, consider the Azure We use the word ‘some’ here, as NV12adsA10_v5. Its Nvidia A10 8Q GPU unfortunately it can be held back by its has 8 GB of frame buffer memory which GPU. The Nvidia A10 4Q virtual GPU only should still be enough for small to medium has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than most sized datasets displayed at FHD resolution. of the other VMs on test. This appears to The Azure NV6_v3 and Azure NV12_v3 limit the size of models or resolutions one (both Nvidia M60) should also perform OK can work with. in similar workflows, but these VMs will For example, while the Revit RFO soon be end of life. None of these VMs are v3 2021 benchmark ran fine at FHD suitable for GPU ray tracing. resolution, it crashed at 4K, reporting For resolutions approaching 4K, a ‘video driver error’. We presume this consider VMs with the 16 GB Nvidia T4 crash was caused by (Azure NC4asT4_v3, the GPU running out of Azure NC8asT4_v3, memory, as it ran fine on Azure NC16asT4_v3, Desktop workstations can significantly Azure NV12adsA10_v5, AWS G4dn.xlarge, AWS with the 8 GB Nvidia G4dn.2xlarge, AWS outperform cloud workstations in all different A10-8Q virtual GPU. workflows, but to compare them on performance G4dn.4xlarge). All of Here, it used up to 7 GB these VMs can also be alone would be missing the point entirely at peak. This might seem considered for entry-level a lot of GPU memory for GPU ray tracing. a CAD/BIM application, For top-end and it certainly is. Even Revit’s Basic V520 graphics while AWS G5.2xl has the performance at 4K resolution consider sample project and advanced sample much more powerful Nvidia A10G. VMs with the 24 GB Nvidia A10, including project both use 3.5 GB at 4K resolution At FHD resolution, the Nvidia A10G the AWS G5.xlarge, AWS G5.2xlarge, AWS in Revit 2021. But this high GPU memory is dramatically faster than the AMD G5.4xlarge, AWS G5.8xlarge and Azure usage looks to have been addressed in Radeon Pro V520 in viz software (more NV36adsA10_v5. Interestingly, while all more recent versions of the software. In than 3 times faster in Autodesk VRED four VMs offer similar performance in Revit 2023, for example, the Basic sample Professional, for example) but there is V-Ray and KeyShot, the AWS instances are project only uses 1.3 GB and the Advanced very little difference between the two notably faster in real time workflows. We sample project only uses 1.2 GB. in Revit. However, at 4K resolution in don’t know why this is.

Interestingly, this same ‘video driver Revit, the Nvidia A10G pulls away as The AWS.G4dn.12xlarge is also error’ does not occur when running more demands are being placed on the worth a mention as it is the only VM we the Revit RFO v3 2021 benchmark on a GPU, thus exposing some of the potential tested that features multiple GPUs (4 x desktop workstation with a 4 GB Nvidia limitations of the AMD Radeon Pro V520. Nvidia T4). While this helps deliver T1000 GPU, or with Azure NV8as v4, Finally, Azure NC8asT4_v3 or AWS more performance in GPU renderers which also has a 4 GB vGPU (1/4 of G4dn.2xlarge could be interesting options (KeyShot and V-Ray GPU) it has no an AMD Radeon Instinct MI25). As a for workflows that involve using Revit benefit for real-time viz, result, we guess it might be a specific alongside visualisation applications with VRED issue with the Nvidia virtual GPU driver like Enscape, Lumion and Twinmotion. and how that handles shared memory We found the Nvidia T4 GPU delivered for “overflow” frame buffer data when good performance in those apps at FHD dedicated graphics memory runs out. resolution, but not at 4K where things AWS G4ad.2xlarge looks to be another slow down. However, as they both good option for CAD/BIM workflows, have slower CPUs, general application standing out for its price/performance. The performance will not be as good as it is VM’s AMD Radeon Pro V520 GPU delivers with AWS G4ad.2xlarge or Azure good performance at FHD resolution but NV6adsA10_v5. slows down a little at 4K, more so in Revit, than in Inventor. It includes 8 GB of GPU Visualisation with GPUs memory which should be plenty to load up For real-time viz, a the most demanding CAD/BIM datasets. high-performance

‘‘

’’

WS38

May / June 2023

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 38

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

Professional, Unreal and Enscape only able to use one of the four GPUs. Finally, it’s certainly worth checking out GCP’s new G2 VMs with ‘Ada Lovelace’ Nvidia L4 GPUs, which entered general availability on May 9 2023. While the Nvidia L4 is nowhere near as powerful as the Nvidia L40, it should still perform well in a range of GPU visualisation workflows, and with 24 GB of GPU memory it can handle large datasets. Frame will be testing this instance in the coming weeks.

As mentioned earlier, 3D performance for real time viz is heavily dependent on the size of your datasets. Those that work with smaller, less complex product / mechanical design assemblies or smaller / less realistic building models may find they do just fine with lower spec VMs. Conversely if you intend to visualise a city scale development or highly detailed aerospace assembly then it’s unlikely that any of the cloud workstation VMs will have enough power to cope. And this is one reason why some AEC firms that have invested in cloud workstations for CAD/BIM and BIM-centric viz workflows prefer to keep high-end desktops for their most demanding design viz users.

Visualisation with CPUs The stand-out performers for CPU rendering are quite clear with the Azure NV36adsA10_v5 with 36 vCPU and AWS. G4dn.12xlarge with 48 vCPU delivering by far the best results in V-Ray, KeyShot and those renderers built into Revit and Inventor.

Interestingly, even though the AMD EPYC 74F3 – Milan processor in Azure NV36adsA10_v5 has 12 fewer vCPUs than the Intel Xeon 8259 - Cascade Lake in the AWS.G4dn.12xlarge it delivers better performance in some CPU rendering benchmarks due to its superior IPC. However, it also comes with a colossal 440 GB of system memory so you may be paying for resources you simply won’t use.

Of course, these high-end VMs are very expensive. Those with fewer vCPUs can also do a job but you’ll need to wait longer for renders. Alternatively, work at lower resolutions to prep a scene and offload production renders and animations to a cloud render farm.

Desktop workstation comparisons It’s impossible to talk about cloud workstations without drawing comparisons with desktop workstations, so we’ve included results from a selection of machines we’ve reviewed over the last six months. Some of the results are quite revealing, though not that surprising (to us at least).

In short, desktop workstations can significantly outperform cloud workstations in all different workflows.

This is for a few reasons.

1.

Desktop workstations tend to have the latest CPU and GPU technologies.

13th Gen Intel Core processors, for example, have much a higher IPC than anything available in the cloud, and Nvidia’s new ‘Ada Lovelace’ GPUs are only now starting to make an appearance in the cloud.

However, these are only single slot and not as powerful as the dual slot desktop Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Enscape is one of the leading realtime viz tools used by architects

www.AECmag.com

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 39

2.

Users of desktop workstations have access to a dedicated CPU, whereas users of cloud workstations are allocated part of a CPU, and those CPUs tend to have more cores, so they run at lower frequencies.

3.

Desktop workstation CPUs have much higher ‘Turbo’ potential than cloud workstation CPUs. This can make a particularly big difference in single threaded CAD applications, where the fastest desktop processors can hit frequencies of well over 5.0 GHz.

Of course, to compare cloud workstations to desktop workstation on performance alone would be missing the point entirely.

Cloud workstations offer AEC firms many benefits. These include global availability, simplifying and accelerating onboarding/ offboarding, the ability to scale up and down resources on-demand, centralised desktop and IT management, built-in security with no data on the end-user PC, lower CapEx costs, data resiliency, data centralisation, easier disaster recovery (DR) capability and the built in ability to work from anywhere, to name but a few. But this is the subject for a whole new article.

End user experience testing While benchmarking helps us understand the relative performance of different VMs, it doesn’t consider what happens between the datacentre and the end user. Network conditions, such as bandwidth, latency and packet loss can have a massive impact on user experience, as can the remoting protocol, which adapts to network conditions to maintain a good user experience.

EUC Score (www.eucscore.com) is a dedicated tool developed by Dr. Bernhard Tritsch that captures, measures and quantifies perceived

May / June 2023

WS39

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

End user experience testing - the EUC Score Sync Player interface 1

2

3

4

6 5

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

7 1 Cloud and Instance type (e.g. Azure NC8asT4_V3) ● 2 Latency and network bandwidth ● 3 Click for detailed information about the VM specs, connection and endpoint ● 4 Click to maximimise the viewport ● 5 Viewport playback (examine for compression / responsiveness to mouse ●

movements, etc.)

6 Task Manager showing resources used at the endpoint (not the cloud workstation) ● 7 Timeline (play back in real time or scrub up and down, as necessary) ●

a Actual CPU utilisation ● b Quantisation Priority (QP) (level of compression being applied to the video stream) ● c Performance in the viewport (Frames Per Second) ● d Round trip network latency ● e Actual network bandwidth used ● f Actual GPU utilisation of Nvidia GPUs with select applications ● g GPU memory utilisation ● h GPU utilisation for encoding the video stream (H.264) ● fig 1

end-user experience in remote desktops end user experience, and size everything the Frame website (https://ux.fra.me). and applications. By capturing the real accordingly. In addition, if a user complains EUC Score Sync Player is able to display user experience in a high-quality video about their experience, it can help identify eight different types of telemetry data on the client device of a 3D application in what’s wrong. After all, there’s no point in at the same time, so that’s why there are use, it shows what the end user is really giving someone a more powerful VM, if it’s different views of the telemetry data. The experiencing and puts it in the context the network that’s causing the problem or generic ‘Frame’ recordings are a good of a whole variety of telemetry data. This the remoting protocol can’t deliver the best starting point, but you can also dig down could be memory, GPU or CPU utilisation, user experience. into more detail in ‘CPU’ and ‘GPU’. remoting protocol statistics or network For EUC testing, we selected a handful of When watching the recordings, here insights such as are some things to look bandwidth, network out for. Round trip latency or the amount New VMs come online, and prices change, as do your latency is important of compression being and when this is high applications and workflows. But unlike desktops, applied to the video (anything over 100ms) you’re not stuck with your purchasing decision stream. The big benefit it can take a while for of the EUC Score Sync the VM to respond to Player is that it brings mouse and keyboard telemetry data and the captured real user different VMs from our list of 23. We tested input and for the stream to come back. experience video together in a single our 3D apps at FHD and 4K resolution Any delay can make the system feel laggy, environment. using a special hardware device that and hard to position 3D models quickly When armed with this information, IT simulates different network conditions. and accurately on screen. And, if you architects and directors can get a much The results are best absorbed by keep overshooting, it can have a massive better understanding of the impact of watching the captured videos and impact on modelling productivity. different VMs / network conditions on telemetry data, which can all be seen on In low-bandwidth, higher latency

‘‘

’’

WS40

May / June 2023

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 40

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

conditions (anything below 8 Mbps) the video stream might need to be heavily compressed. As this compression is ‘lossy’ and not ‘lossless’ it can cause visual compression artefacts, which is not ideal for precise CAD work. In saying that, the Frame Remoting Protocol 8 (FRP8) Quality of Service engine does do a great job and resolves to full high-quality once you stop moving the 3D model around.

Compression might be more apparent at 4K resolution than at FHD resolution, as there are four times as many pixels, meaning much more data to send.

Frame, like most graphics-optimised remoting protocols, will automatically adapt to network conditions to maintain interactivity. EUC Score not only gives you a visual reference to this compression by recording the user experience, but it also quantifies the amount of compression being applied by FRP8 to the video stream through a metric called Quantisation Priority (QP). The lower the number, the less visual compression artefacts you will see. However, the lowest you can get is 12, as to the end user this appears to be visually lossless. This highest you can get is 50 which is super blurry.

Visual compression should not be confused with Revit’s ‘simplify display during view navigation’ feature that suspends certain details and graphics effects to maintain 3D performance. In the EUC Score player you can see this in action with textures and shadows temporarily disappearing when the model is moving. In other CAD tools this is known as Level of Detail (LoD).

The recordings can also give some valuable insight into how much each application uses the GPU. Enscape and Unreal Engine, for example, utilise 100% of GPU resources so you can be certain that a more powerful GPU would boost 3D performance (in Unreal Engine, EUC Score records this with a special Nvidia GPU usage counter).

Meanwhile, GPU utilisation in Revit and Inventor is lower, so if your graphics performance is poor or you want to turn off LoD you may be better off with a CPU with a higher frequency or better IPC than a more powerful GPU. To help find your way around the EUC Score interface, see Figure 1. In Figures 2 and 3 we show the impact of network bandwidth on visual compression

EUC Score test results View the captured videos and telemetry data recordings on the Frame website (https://ux.fra.me).

Enscape scene showing heavy compression on network with 2 Mbps bandwidth and 200ms RTT latency (visual artefacts particularly noticeable on concrete slab and on edges)

fig 2

Same scene with no compression

fig 3

artefacts. This could be a firm that does not have sufficient bandwidth to support tens, hundreds, or thousands of cloud workstation users or when the kids come home from school, and they all start streaming Netflix.

Conclusion

certainly might not be good for another.

Also be aware that some of the public cloud VMs are much older than others. If you consider that firms typically upgrade their desktop workstations every 3 to 5 years, a few are positively ancient. The great news about the cloud is that you can change VMs whenever you like. New machines come online, and prices change, as do your applications and workflows.

But unlike desktops, you’re not stuck with a purchasing decision.

While AEC firms will always be under pressure to drive down costs, performance is essential. A slow workstation can have a massive negative impact on productivity and morale, even worse if it crashes. Make sure you test, test and test again, using data from your own real-world projects.

If you’re an AEC firm looking into public cloud workstations for CAD, BIM or design visualisation, we hope this article has given you a good starting point for your own internal testing, something we’d always strongly recommend.

There is no one size fits all for cloud workstations and some of the instances we’ve tested make no sense for certain workflows, especially at 4K resolution.

This isn’t just about applications. While it’s important to understand the demands of different tools, dataset complexity and size can also have a massive impact on For more details, insights or advice, feel free to performance, especially with 3D graphics contact to Ruben Spruijt (ruben@fra.me) or at 4K resolution. What’s good for one firm, Bernhard Tritsch (btritsch@bennytritsch.com).

www.AECmag.com

WS30_31_32_33_34_35_36_37_38_39_40_41_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CloudW.indd 41

May / June 2023

WS41

29/05/2023 06:56

workstation special report

Reimagining the desktop workstation

VDI solution is no more than 10%, which is, of course, surprising especially after Covid and the move to more flexible working.

The reasons are down to complexity and cost, the desire of users to have the best possible performance. Running from Public Cloud can have the issue of latency and the CPU clock speeds. On-premise Greg Corke caught up with Adam Jull, VDI can also be tricky, although this is still CEO of IMSCAD, to explore the rise of the most common approach taken by our the desktop workstation as a dedicated customers. We have delivered hundreds remote resource of these on-prem VDI solutions. As long as you engage your users, this way will MSCAD is one of the pioneers of deliver the required performance.

Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Traditional workstations [configured (VDI) and cloud workstation solu- for remote working] just work. OK, let tions for graphics intensive appli- me rephrase that - they work well 95% of cations, including CAD. The company the time. offers a range of solutions for on-premThe feeling was that five to six years ise, public and private cloud, using a ago VDI and Cloud would take over the variety of technologies for graphics vir- traditional workstation market, but tualisation including Citrix, VMWare, this has not been the case. Applications Nvidia vGPU and more. are getting bigger, more demanding Recently, the company added HP workflows with VR, AI, visualisation, and Anyware into the mix. One aspect of this digital twins. I also have to say the OEMs move was to provide IMSCAD customers have done a great job improving and with a secured, high-performance evolving their range of hardware options remote solution that works with desktop for specific workflows. workstations, rather than The other factors are dedicated rack mounted around cost. Public Cloud servers. The idea is that is great for some things but rather than getting involved for GPU-based desktops, it in the complexities of still is very expensive. If you virtualisation, users can want to run a Private Cloud get a dedicated one-towith your own physical one connection to a highservers but hosted in a performance desktop datacentre, then the costs workstation. We caught can be reduced. The most up with IMSCAD CEO, cost-effective way is still Adam Jull to explore on-premise, absolutely no what this means for question. Firms have their design, engineering, and The feeling was own reasons and ideas for architecture firms. either of these options that five to six doing for deployment, but the key years ago VDI skill IMSCAD brings is our Greg Corke: The industry has been talking about VDI experience with ISVs like and Cloud and cloud workstations would take over Autodesk and how to fully for the past ten years but, the environment to the traditional optimise it seems, they’ve never give users the best possible workstation fulfilled their potential. experience.

What trends are you seeing market, but this at IMSCAD? Greg Corke: Recently, has not been we’ve seen a big shift in the case Adam Jull: Since Nvidia the workstation market launched GRID GPUs many with both HP and Lenovo moons ago, the market launching ‘Sapphire Rapids’ has seen many variants of how you can desktop workstations that are also purpose virtualise your workstations with VDI built for racks. These are all 4U or 5U. But or run them in the Public Cloud, but to if you look at 12th or 13th Gen Intel Core, date the number of firms running their you can find some very powerful micro desktops this way is still low. At IMSCAD, workstations that can also be rack mounted we have more enquiries for these types of with custom kits. What is it about these solutions from the US, where we have over machines that customers find attractive?

50% of our customers.

In the UK and across Europe I would Adam Jull: I like the HP Z2 Mini and guess uptake of an implemented hosted or Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra

I

‘‘

’’

WS42

May / June 2023

WS42_43_AEC_MAYJUNE23_IMSCAD-MacBook Pro (2).indd 42

[recently replaced by the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra] a lot. Small, but powerful, mountable in a datacentre cabinet or in an office server room.

Effectively you get the power of a workstation in these small form factors and, just as importantly, you can then add a remoting software solution, of which there are a few good options.

You can run as a bare metal 1:1 machine, giving full resource to the user from any other device they want to connect from.

If you then collocate these machines in datacentre environment you effectively create your own Private Cloud with remoting capabilities, so removing the need for a VPN, improving the user’s remote access and with the control features you can run the workstations in a similar way to a VDI server farm.

I would call this ‘one step before VDI’ which is a simpler and ultimately you will not be going too far away from your traditional on-premise approach.

Bare metal, 1:1 with the user, highly resourced and capable of handling all applications, no virtual layer and much less complexity and really neat, in my humble opinion.

Greg Corke: What kind of density can you get from the HP Z2 Mini G9? How many units in a standard rack and how does this compare to a traditional VDI using virtualised servers?

Adam Jull: In a typical 42U rack you can get up to 36 HP Z2 Mini G9 workstations.

It’s difficult to compare that to a traditional VDI server deployment but if we are coming at it from a dedicated GPU standpoint that probably works best in that scenario.

So, with many high-end design applications and visualisation tools requiring more and more GPU resource for optimal performance to cope with users ever more demanding workflows, most users are typically looking for around 8 GB plus of GPU. If we take an HP Z2 Mini G9 generously resourced with the Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB GPU we can provide 36 users.

Compare that to a server, remembering the Z2 Mini is 1:1 so our comparison should be based on a published virtual desktop. Most datacentre GPUs tend to top out at 48 GB, so you can get where I’m going with this.

If we take a server that has 2 x Nvidia L40 48 GB cards on board, you are only getting 8 users per server. To get to the same density as our racked Z2 Mini you are going to need 6 x servers! So, as you can imagine there is going to be a substantial difference in cost. www.AECmag.com

31/05/2023 14:20

workstation special report

The HP Z2 Mini G9 is most commonly deployed on desktops, but the spacesaving design means it can also deliver impressive density in the datacentre

Greg Corke: One of the big advantages of using traditional servers for VDI is that they are built from the ground up for the datacentre and have remote management built in.

Desktop workstation manufacturers are now addressing this with optional system controller cards.

HP’s new Anyware Remote System Controller is even available as an external USB box to give the HP Z2 Mini similar capabilities. Do these system controllers give desktop workstations the exact same capabilities as dedicated rack servers, or are there things still missing?

Adam Jull: Things that you might take as a ‘given’ or a standard function with server virtualisation have sometimes been a touch tricky to achieve with a [traditional] workstation fleet. Features that would have previously required administrators to use third party tools are now being introduced and catered for. The HP Anyware Integrated Remote System Controller does go a long way in closing that gap as systems administrators will now have the ability to remotely manage their workstation fleet from a single pane. It also provides features such as power management, hardware alerts and diagnostics along with the ability to image or reimage the operating systems. So, a big step in the right direction.

redundant PSUs, rear power buttons, front access hot swap storage. But with the smaller machines you still need to get inside. Does this make management and servicing of these machines harder?

Adam Jull: The Z2 Mini can be racked in much the same way as a larger workstation and, in fact, HP has put a lot of thought into the design. It’s worth noting that although the Z2 Mini has a smaller form factor, the Rail Rack Kit slides out from the rack providing excellent clearance and access to cables and ports etc. The Rail Rack Kit also features captive fasteners, providing quick and easy tool-free access to the workstations. So, in terms of servicing and management, the Z2 Mini itself offers tool-less access and slide out components, allowing for simple and easy swap out capabilities which could be for maintenance or expansion. Ultimately, these machines are extremely reliable.

Greg Corke: With a centralised desktop workstation solution, do firms tend to give users their own dedicated machine, which they remote into wherever they work, or is there a shared pool? Are firms using the cloud to handle peaks?

Adam Jull: With HP Z workstations, users have access to bare metal resource Greg Corke: The larger rack friendly and remote access to those resources by desktop workstations come with ‘server- one of the best-in-class remoting protocols grade’ features like hot-swappable in HP Anyware’s PCoIP. www.AECmag.com

WS42_43_AEC_MAYJUNE23_IMSCAD-MacBook Pro (2).indd 43

Much like other remoting solutions, HP Anyware provides desktop administrators the ability to grant users or groups access as they see fit, whether that’s dedicating a user to a specific machine or having a bunch of machines available on more of a round robin or random assignment. And just touching on that management piece it’s worth highlighting that HP provides an end-to-end product for the centralised desktop deployment model.

Typical components would be the HP Anyware Manager which provides administrators with a management plane to configure, manage, broker and monitor remote workstation connections.

There’s also HP Anyware Connector which provides security gateway services and user authentication for remote connections to their assigned desktops and then, of course, there’s the HP Anyware Agents which is software installed on the remote workstation which securely encodes the desktop and streams pixels-only to the PCoIP Client.

The PCoIP Client is also required and helps to complete the circuit, if you will.

It’s installed on the user’s end device and allows them to connect to the remote workstation. It decodes a stream of PCoIP pixels from the remote workstation PCoIP Agent. Most firms using this type of solution are pretty savvy - they know their workforce will flex whether that’s up or down, typically we see firms overprovision rather than burst into the cloud.

■ www.imscadservices.com

May / June 2023

WS43

31/05/2023 14:20

workstation special report

Staying ahead of the ESG curve Could a lack of sustainable IT investment mean AEC firms run the risk of being excluded from tenders? Asks Keith Ali, MD at Creative ITC

T

he AEC sector has a pivotal role to play as we transition to a lower carbon future. Buildings account for 40% of global energy consumption and a third of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, emissions from cement and concrete production have doubled over the last 20 years and currently make up 8% of total CO2 generation globally.

There are positive signs that the industry is moving to tackle these issues.

Architects Declare is among many groups calling for real change and pushing for greater impetus. Carbon offsetting is increasingly frowned upon as a prime example of the tendency towards greenwashing, an empty promise that will not contribute to achieving net zero targets.

There’s rising pressure on AEC firms to provide incontestable evidence of the benefits of their environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies. Last year, two ESG disclosure laws became mandatory in the UK and many other countries are following suit.

For AEC firms, these steps serve as a warning shot for what’s to come.

ESG requirements in public tenders are growing more stringent and there’s expectation of more widespread stipulations to come, with the potential to directly hit the bottom lines of noncompliant firms. Exclusion from AEC tenders looms, unless they can substantiate their sustainability claims. The message is clear - what’s needed is fundamental behavioural change.

Transformation from the inside out While the renewed focus on climate change is starting to shift mindsets when it comes to commissioning, designing and constructing, working practices within AEC organisations often lag behind.

Legacy IT solutions have plagued the industry for years, hampering operational efficiency. It’s less well recognised that outdated IT infrastructure is also a massive generator of CO2. Enterprise technology accounts for about 1% of worldwide GHG emissions – that’s equal to the total amount generated by the UK and equivalent to half of all emissions from aviation or shipping globally.

Greener IT is not WS44

January / February 2023

WS44_AEC_MAYJUNE23_CreativeITC.indd 44

just about reassessing infrastructure to drive carbon reduction, it’s also about transforming working practices, operations and solution efficiency.

Unfortunately, many AEC companies don’t practice what they preach. It’s still commonplace for AEC professionals to work on bids for smart, eco-friendly projects using power-hungry CAD workstations that don’t maximise the use of renewable energy sources. Once the project kicks off, that behaviour is multiplied many times over as multidisciplinary teams are drafted in. To put that into perspective, according to research from Dell, 60 such workstations running for 12 hours produce around 48,000 kg of CO2eq. That’s the same amount as driving 170,000 miles in a family car.

maintain on-premise technology, thereby reducing energy consumption, cooling costs and waste from decommissioned equipment. Cloud providers can also make intelligent use of virtual machines and containers to reduce the number of servers needed at data centres and improve sustainability and ESG scores.

Global engineering company SNCLavalin, for example, is working to reduce its number of data centres worldwide from 16 down to three.

“One of the big benefits we’ve seen already in our carbon footprint is that we’ve reduced storage by 69%. We’ve reduced the electricity by 53% and the floorspace by 45%,” said Steve Capper, Group CIO of SNC-Lavalin.

IT teams are pivotal to change

Technology improvements are an often over-looked strategy that AEC firms can deploy to make a tangible difference in the race towards net zero. A new breed of industry specialist MSPs are emerging with the expertise to help AEC firms unlock the greatest value from transitioning to futureproof IT infrastructures, adopting new technologies and improving their working practices. There’s a clear case for AEC firms to opt for sustainable IT solutions, which can dramatically reduce their carbon footprint and positively impact environmental scorecards.

In addition to contributing to the achievement of global environmental goals, AEC companies adopting best practices will reap a number of financial and operational rewards. With increasingly stringent ESG requirements, they’ll have greater opportunity to bid for tenders and face fewer regulatory interventions. Sustainable companies outperform their industry peers on profitability and EBITDA, and enjoy top-line growth, increased productivity and reduced costs. Publicly owned top performers are also more likely to see higher equity returns, less downside risk, lower loan and credit default swap spreads and higher credit ratings.

There is a clear connection between ESG aims and business value. With such a pivotal role to play on a global stage, time is running out for the AEC industry to drive fundamental behavioural change. As environmental, social and governmental concerns grow ever more urgent, business and IT leaders should keep this link front of mind and make smart choices now.

Future success will surely depend on it.

Fortunately, IT teams have a number of practical sustainability initiatives they can implement to deliver tangible change.

One of the ways to address ESG challenges is adopting virtualisation via Desktop-as-a-Service. Some VDI solutions are hosted in datacentres operating on 100% clean and renewable energy. Our AEC-focused VDIPOD solution, for example, offers firms a path to net zero with metrics and an auditable trail to simplify ESG reporting.

AEC companies deploying the service use 81.7% less energy with a combined 89% renewable power model (one VDI server supporting 60 laptops/thin clients) at source compared to traditional CAD workstations and reduce CO2eq by up to 43% (calculations based on standard Dell high graphic workstations, Supermicro VDI servers and Dell XPS laptops).

Since migrating over 400 employees to VDIPOD, one multi-award-winning international architecture and design studio has realised a three-fold increase in renewable power use and a 90% reduction in kilowatt hours (kWh) per person. With more users onboarding in Asia Pacific, the US and Canada those benefits will only increase further still.

Transitioning to an Infrastructureas-a-Service (IaaS) model is another change IT teams can implement to reduce energy costs and environmental impact.

Crucially, when AEC firms move to a fully managed IaaS solution, the responsibility of infrastructure management moves to the service provider, along with power consumption and carbon footprint. By migrating data, applications and IT services to the cloud, AEC firms no longer need to

Creating future value

■ www.creative-itc.com

www.AECmag.com

29/05/2023 07:03

Technology for the product lifecycle

Subscribe now

*

register.develop3d.com

Si ste rp ub lic at ion

Print or digital

to

FREE

*Free for UK readers ($49 per annum for ROW)

Mag subs inside AEC (PRINT).indd 1

07/10/2022 16:05

Don’t miss another deadline Cloud workstations built around your requirements

AEC & BIM

CAD & CAE

Media & Entertainment

Create accurate 3D models to help visualise buildings, from your office, home or even construction sites.

From initial design to complex simulations, scale the GPU resource as and when you need it.

Keep ahead by bursting to the cloud when greater GPU resource is required to complete a project.

Apply now for your free proof of concept trial

scan.co.uk/prographicscloud • 01204 47 47 47