ii. Annex 2: Survey reports key findings

The second survey gathered additional information on the neighborhoods that our participants were living in under lockdown. We inquired on the interactions within and between neighbours before and during lockdown. We also inquired on the presence and activities of security and police during the lockdown window, work, neighbourhood life and support, and participants’ coping mechanisms under lockdown.

The charts below indicate the different observations on surveillance and security, outlining the heavier observation of private security in the suburban typology areas, the heavy presence of police and army in the inner city areas, as well as the diverse observations of security agencies in the township areas.

From top: Suburban, CBD & Inner City and Township participants

This survey was sent to a wider audience, gathering information on household experiences during lockdown, and drawing queries from both Survey I and II. As indicated by the infographics below, majority of participants for this survey were from Suburban areas.

In the charts below, we distribution of participants by typology, and the theme of mobility before, and during Level-5 Lockdown. As indicated in the charts, residents across all area typologies were sometimes unable to access some essential goods within their neighborhoods, and relied mainly on private means of transport (or ride-sharing platforms) to aquire them while under lockdown.