Skip to main content

Governing Body Annual Review Policy, 2026

Page 1


GOVERNING BODY ANNUAL REVIEW POLICY

This policy was approved by the Committee of Management on 22 July 2026 It should be reviewed again no later than 30th June 2029

The policy has been assessed through the organisational impact assessment process.

We can, if requested, produce this document in different formats such as larger print or audioformat We can also translate the document into various languages, as appropriate.

SCOTTISH STANDARD 1

HOUSING

The governing body leads and directs the RSL to achieve REGULATOR good outcomes for its tenants and other service users. STANDARDS

STANDARD 2

The RSL is open about and accountable for what it does. It understands and takes account of the needs and priorities of its tenants, service users and stakeholders. Its primary focus is the sustainable achievement of these priorities.

STANDARD 3

The RSL manages its resources to ensure its financial well-being, while maintaining rents at a level that tenants can afford to pay.

STANDARD 4

The Governing body bases its decisions on good quality information and advice and identifies and mitigates risks to the organisation’s purpose.

STANDARD 5

The RSL conducts its affairs with honesty and integrity.

STANDARD 6

The Governing body and senior officers have the skills and knowledge they need to be effective.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

West Granton Housing Co-operative Committee of Management comprises up to 15 volunteers from diverse backgrounds, with varied experience and expertise levels. Responsible for providing collective leadership in setting and achieving strategic objectives, the Committee of Management must also control the activities of WGHC and ensure that they remain within the law, its Rules, and relevant regulatory requirements.

The Committee of Management therefore requires mechanisms that will enable it to review its performance and ensure that its members acquire and continue to develop the necessary skills and knowledge that will support individual and collective effectiveness.

Committee members’ self-assessments of their contributions and learning and support needs will be at the centre of our approach. We will make individual reviews with Committee members a positive experience that strengthens confidence and capacity.

WGHC recognises the importance of the regular refreshing of Committee membership. We will balance the need for turnover alongside the need to retain skills, experience and commitment, all of which contribute to successful community-led governance.

2.0 POLICY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this policy are as follows:

 Implement measures to ensure the effective performance of the Committee of Management as a whole;

 Implement measures for the effective performance of individual Committee of Management members, including the Chairperson;

 Use the review process to make sure Committee members receive the support they need to carry out their role;

 Assess Committee of Management members’ continuing levels of objectivity, effectiveness and ability to offer independent constructive challenge;

 Promote membership of the Committee of Management and manage turnover in Committee membership.

3.0 COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW PROGRAMME

Annual reviews are a way to thank Committee members for their contributions, make all feel valued, and celebrate achievements.

The annual review also provides assurance to our customers, funders and partners that the Committee of Management has the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively discharge its duties.

The annual review should:

 highlight skills

 identify personal training and development priorities

 support and encourage personal development

 discuss aspirations and future intentions

 Reflect on both individual contributions and the overall effectiveness of our governance

 support risk management

 assist with succession planning

 identify gaps in overall Committee skills and experience to be filled by training or recruitment.

WGHC may appoint a consultant to support the Committee of Management in the process. There will be an annual review cycle, consisting of three main stages as set out below.

3.1 Assessing the Committee of Management’s effectiveness

The Committee of Management and senior staff will annually self-assess compliance with Regulatory Standards and agree a development plan based on this, and a report of the annual review.

This will be carried out through a combination of self-assessment questionnaires (including member’s individual annual reviews), skills/knowledge and training needs audit, evidence validation and discussion.

Facilitated governance training days and workshops may also be used to focus on building on existing governance achievements.

An annual report will be presented to the Committee of Management identifying strengths, achievements, and any required improvements in relation to how the Committee operates.

3.2 Annual review conversations with each Committee of Management member

Each Committee member will take part in an annual review conversation with the Chairperson. Meetings will normally be scheduled for the months of May and/or June.

WGHC will ensure the Chairperson is suitably supported in carrying out this role. From year to year, the person supporting the Chairperson may be changed, for example:

 The Vice Chairperson

 A member of staff providing administrative and other support or

 An external consultant.

Committee members will normally be asked to complete a self-assessment form to prepare for their review conversation. The review conversation will address the individual member’s views on their personal contribution and effectiveness, the full Committee’s effectiveness, and on the future priorities and plans for WGHC.

Review meetings will be informal, to encourage open discussion about the Committee member’s contribution and learning and development needs. A note will be made of each review meeting, to provide a record of the main points discussed and any follow-up actions.

Document Name:

Created:

Owner:

Location / Path:

Larke Adger / WGHC

David Mills / WGHC WGHC \ X:

3.3 The Chairperson’s Review

The Chairperson will be the subject of a separate review (appraisal). The following arrangements will support this action:

 An Appraisal Sub-Committee (for the Chair only)

Three members, for example the Vice Chair plus 2 Members, will be involved in the Chairperson’s review. An independent facilitator/consultant or the Secretary will also attend to take notes and procedurally support the Sub-Committee; their role is not to appraise the Chair.

The meeting will include the standard review conversation that applies to all Committee members, and a discussion based on the Chairperson’s Role Description. In this regard, feedback will be invited from other Committee members on how the Chairperson has carried out their role.

3.4

Reviews for

Committee members with 9 or more years’ continuous service

WGHC values the commitment and contribution of voluntary Committee members and does not assume that length of service by itself reduces effectiveness. We will seek reasonable assurance during annual review meetings that committee members affected by the “9-year rule” and who wish to seek re- election continue to be committed and effective in their role.

The Management Committee as a whole is responsible for deciding whether a committee member affected by the 9-year rule may stand again for election. The Office Bearers may make a recommendation on such cases, which the Committee may accept or reject in reaching its decision.

The Committee will refer to the criteria discussed with the member at their annual review meeting. This will include the member’s continued willingness to learn and keep up to date with changes affecting WGHC, their commitment and impact as a committee member remains strong (preparation for meetings, attendance, contributions at meetings, working as part of a team) and their adherence to WGHC’s Code of Conduct for Committee members.

The Committee member who is the subject of the decision should withdraw from the meeting during the Management Committee’s discussion but may ask to address the meeting either before or after the Committee reaches its decision.

3.5 Committee Development Plan

A report will be prepared to include the following:

 Action points from the Committee of Management’s review meetings, any selfassessment questionnaires, and/or discussions at training events and workshops throughout the year.

 An overview of the issues raised during committee members’ review meetings, and any action points for improving the way committee business is done;

 Training and development needs identified during annual review conversations;

 Members’ intentions about remaining as a committee member and seeking an officebearer position in future;

 Any succession planning or recruitment/promotion issues identified, and proposed action points.

The report will include a Development Plan for the Committee of Management for discussion and approval.

The training and development proposals in the Development Plan will take account of broader factors, as required. For example, the priorities set in WGHCs business plan; changes in our operating environment; and external risks affecting the organisation

The Development Plan will report on the training needs identified for the Committee of Management as a whole.

WGHC will make resources available to meet Committee members’ learning and development needs, including provision for committee training in the annual budget.

An outcome of the Committee Development Plan will be an annual training plan for Committee Members that will identify individual and collective training throughout the year. This will be progressed by the Senior Management Team.

4.0 COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING

WGHC’s Rules state the formal arrangements for renewal of committee membership. Onethird of committee members must stand down each year, and retiring members are eligible to seek re-election alongside other members seeking to join the Committee for the first time.

Rule 34.6 (see appendix 1) requires the Committee to be assured that members with nine years continuous service seeking re-election can demonstrate continued effectiveness before standing.

Whilst WGHC benefits from the contributions of experienced members, refreshing committee membership can bring new and different experience or perspectives.

Accordingly, WGHC will aim to achieve a balance between experienced and newer committee members. We will meet regulatory requirements by reviewing the continued effectiveness of longer-standing members whilst encouraging new members.

Our approach to committee renewal and succession planning will involve:

 Reflecting on the committee’s membership profile as part of the annual review of the committee’s performance

 Discussing future intentions with existing committee members as part of their annual review conversation with the Chairperson;

 Deciding whether committee members with 9-plus years’ service should be eligible to stand for re-election, based on the test of continued effectiveness;

 Encouraging WGHC tenants with an interest in our work to consider standing for election to the committee;

 Considering the use of co-options as a way of broadening the overall range of experience and skills available, particularly in relation to specialist or technical areas.

Version: Version Date:

Owner:

5.0 APPEALS AND COMPLAINTS

WGHC is committed to valuing complaints and ensures that the organisation benefits from feedback to identify areas for change and improvement.

If anyone is dissatisfied with the service they have received because of this Policy, they will be encouraged to use our Complaints Procedure. Similarly, any individuals dissatisfied with decisions made in the operation of the Policy are entitled to appeal against these.

The WGHC Complaints Policy details the way in which complaints can be made, the timescales for responding and the appeals process.

Anyone dissatisfied with the outcome of their complaint having exhausted WGHC’s complaint procedure has the right to refer the matter to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.

6.0 EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

WGHC will ensure that in implementing this Policy it will not unfairly discriminate against any individual, household or group on the grounds of sex or marital status, on race grounds, or on the grounds of disability, age, sexual orientation, language or social origin, other personal attributes, including beliefs or opinions such as religious beliefs or political opinions. (See Section 8.0 for an Equalities Impact Assessment)

7.0 UK GDPR (GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION)

WGHC will treat all personal data in line with its obligations under the current UK General Data Protection Regulation and The Data Protection Act 2018.

Information regarding how data will be used and the basis for processing data is provided within the WGHC Privacy Notices (available on the WGHC website, or, upon request).

8.0 EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT

WGHC Equality Impact Assessment

Policy Name: Governing Body

Assessor: David Mills, COO

1) Briefly describe the aims, objectives and purpose of the policy

2) Who is intended to benefit from the policy? (e.g. Staff, Tenants, Contractors)

3) What outcomes are wanted from the policy (e.g. benefits to Tenants / Staff etc.)

4) Which protected characteristics could be affected by this policy? (Highlight in yellow all that apply)

Assessment Date: 16/07/2026

To set out WGHC’s approach to annual reviews of the Committee of Management including assurance that longer-serving members continue to demonstrate effectiveness.

Committee of Management members, the Chairperson, senior staff supporting the process, WGHC tenants and other service users through improved governance and assurance.

A transparent, supportive and consistent annual review process that identifies strengths, learning and development needs, succession planning issues and any action required to maintain effective governance and deliver good outcomes for tenants and service users.

5) If the policy is not relevant to any of the protected characteristics listed above, state why and end the process here

6) Describe the likely positive or negative impacts the policy could have on any of the groups identified above in section 4.

The policy is relevant to all protected characteristics because the annual review process considers the skills, knowledge, diversity and objectivity needed by the Committee of Management. No adverse impact has been identified.

Positive Impacts Negative Impacts

It provides opportunities to identify training, support, accessibility or communication needs, encourages diverse participation, and supports succession planning so the Committee has the skills, knowledge, diversity and objectivity required to be effective.

7) What actions are required to address the impacts arising from this assessment?

Name: David Mills, COO

Signature:

Date: 16/07/2026

No remedial action is required. WGHC should continue to apply the annual review process consistently and monitor learning, development and succession planning outcomes for any emerging equality issues.

APPENDIX 1

Legislation, guidance and rules. Scottish Housing Regulator Standards

STANDARD 6: The governing body and senior officers have the skills and knowledge they need to be effective.

6.1 The RSL has a formal, rigorous and transparent process for the election, appointment and recruitment of governing body members. The RSL formally and actively plans to ensure orderly succession to governing body places to maintain an appropriate and effective composition of governing body members and to ensure sustainability of the governing body.

6.2 The governing body annually assesses the skills, knowledge, diversity and objectivity it needs to provide capable leadership, control and constructive challenge to achieve the RSL’s purpose, deliver good tenant outcomes, and manage its affairs. It assesses the contribution of continuing governing body members, and what gaps there are that need to be filled.

6.3 The RSL ensures that all governing body members are subject to annual performance reviews to assess their contribution and effectiveness. The governing body takes account of these annual performance reviews and its skills needs in its succession planning and learning and development plans. The governing body ensures that any non-executive member seeking re-election after nine years’ continuous service demonstrates continued effectiveness.

6.5 The RSL ensures all new governing body members receive an effective induction programme to enable them to fully understand and exercise their governance responsibilities. Existing governing body members are given ongoing support and training to gain, or refresh, skills and expertise and sustain their continued effectiveness.

The Rules of West Granton Housing Co-operative Limited

Rule 34.6: The Committee shall assess annually the skills, knowledge, diversity and objectivity that it needs for its decision making and what is contributed by the Committee Members by way of annual performance reviews. The Committee must be assured that any Committee Member who has continuous service on the Committee of nine years or more and who is seeking re- election is able to demonstrate his/her continued effectiveness as a Committee Member before he/she may stand for re-election.

Rule 56.6 states that among the responsibilities of the Chairperson are that:

56.6.11 appraisal of the performance of Committee Members is undertaken, and that the senior staff officer’s appraisal is carried out in accordance with the agreed policies and procedures of the Co-operative ; and

56.6.12 the training requirements of Committee Members, and the recruitment and induction of new Committee Members is undertaken.

West Granton Housing Co-operative Code of Conduct for Committee of Management Members (based on the Model Code of Conduct produced by the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations)

G. Leadership: You must uphold our principles and commitment to delivering good outcomes for tenants and other service users, and lead the organisation by example

G4 ‘You must participate in and contribute to the annual review of the Committee’s effectiveness and help to identify and attain the range of skills that we need to meet our strategic objectives.’

Document Name: Created:

Larke Adger / WGHC David Mills / WGHC WGHC \ X:

Version:

Version Date: Review Due: Pages: 1.0 22/07/26 30/06/29

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook