The Primacy of Personal What We Value
The findings of TWSC’s new global study suggest that the Primacy of Personal is redefining what people value globally, at a moment when three out of four say what they value most has changed. Five key dimensions help to explain this new value equation.
Wave one of our global research initiative to understand what different stakeholders value
Me Over We
Inside Out
Societal Tilts Selfward
Social Descending
Taking Action Is a Tightrope
Personal emotional value is paramount
My safety, security, health, and happiness above all else
Good for the world starts with good for “me and mine”
Social climbing, status, or expression matter less
Negative reaction now rivals positive support
Top Drivers of Emotional Value Rank from the Inside Out
Top Ways for Contributing Societal Value Tilt Selfward
Social Value Is the First Thing People Are Willing to Give Up
Upsides and Downsides, Equally Precipitous
7x
(after monetary and functional)
Personal Emotional Value Trumps Social and Societal
2x #2
Providing personal emotional value is twice as important as either societal or social value for all generations. For Gen Z and Millennials, providing emotional value is the second most important contribution, after only functional value and more important than monetary value.
23%
15%
25%
14%
Makes me feel secure or safe
Entertains me
Treat people well
Educate me and/or others
22%
14%
22%
14%
Makes me feel healthier
Empowers me
Treat the planet well
Support issues I care about
22%
14%
Gives me joy or happiness
Excites me
In qualitative research, “treats people well” is seen as a proxy for “will treat me well.”
13% Invest in communities
1/2
Across all five value levers and 30 different value driving actions, “increases my social status” ranks lowest with only 7% of people choosing it as most important. When forced to make tradeoffs across all levers of value, social value becomes less than half as important across all markets..
90% 83%
say they will take a positive action if a company helps them live what they value.
say they will take a negative action if a company conflicts with what they value