Disinfo

Disinformation part #1 by number 7

Disinformation is truth concealed with lies. Truth discredited with lies. The truth becomes unbelievable when presented alongside lies. It is discredited by its association with it. The dis (lie) part of the information (truth) does not always lie alongside it (though it may do). often it is only in a much wider context, that the discrediting lies present themselves.

Normal people think by association. If they do not wish to believe in a piece of information, they subconsciously look for reasons not to. They will simply ignore any reasons for doing so, even if they should be overpowering, if it is associated with any other information which is false. So then, if there is a piece of information which the government wants people not to believe, it may broadcast/print the information in its entire fact, assuring the viewer/reader that it is so, but on the same platform, show something which seems very unlikely, and which most people would dismiss and cause to laugh.

This is disinformation in one sense. There are other kinds, but for now lets concentrate on this.

We could call it discreditation by association with delusion. Often the delusion, which in truth, the communicator of the information does not share (probable) will be a belief in an extraterrestrial presence on earth. This often seems to go with a belief that the moon is hollow among other recurring themes.

An example of a disinformation platform is the British Broadcasting Corporation. Another is Nexus magazine. Another is “alternative” talk radio.

Disinformation is spread by certain people who keep “popping up” in the media to discredit subjects by association such as nine-eleven/seven-seven truth, the man-made climate change hoax, the Big Brother state, the truth about vaccinations etcetera; the things “they” (the New World Order et all) don’t want people to be considering.

Lets call these people “disinformation-agents”. A classic example of the “disinformation-agent” is David Icke. This person is about the only “personality” on mainstream media who really goes anywhere near many important issues of today. He is allowed to do this because he discredits them all in one fell swoop by his insistence that key figures in the true conspiracy he exposes (for instance the Rothschild N.W.O. Bankers) are in fact vampiric extra-dimensional giant lizards. After this, the man becomes impossible to take seriously.

At a David Icke show there is no question and answer period. The audience is expected to accept the most outlandish statements of such as that discussed earlier with no kind of proof fore-coming.

His personality-cult is faith based. So, even if you take him at his word, even if you believe him, you do not take him seriously.

However you react to him, you are receiving the information within the context they have made the acceptable one within the controlled media. The only context they have made acceptable ultimately: entertainment.

One reason people do not suspect the dis-info agents of being so is because they are the ones revealing the conspiracy. Why would someone who was part of a conspiracy reveal it ? This is what happens: a piece of information escapes into the public domain the government doesn’t want people to know (say, for instance that the World Trade Centre towers were brought down by controlled demolition on nine-eleven), rather than risk mass uncontrolled, unmonitored interest in this happening, the movement is pounced on while still a tiny, sprouting bud as it is “created” by certain media agents. They know that if they do not do this, a real movement will gradually form based on the slight trickle of media information-area that isn’t absolutely controlled.

They cant control absolutely everything that’s broadcast or written all of the time (though they do a bloody good job of trying to). Though they can own , directly or indirectly, virtually every media company there are still potential problems such as letters pages, live broadcasting, plus in those days the internet was fairly uncensorable. They cant risk the truth becoming visible of its own volition, so they capture that truth and control how it is perceived.

By creating a phony movement first, they can be sure to monitor and control it, and have it overshadow and consume the real deal, the genuine researchers and information pearls in an ocean of liars and lies.

One reason the media is so powerful is that people do not suspect that it is. Once it has taken control of the movement it will then covertly associate itself with outlandish claims. This has the effect of enabling the audience to believe what it wants to, that the suppressed information exposing government is also an outlandish claim.

In this way the government-media can appear to be acting in a free way, giving voice to dissenters, indeed, creating them This is considered an acceptable problem: on many people, it will “backfire” causing them to dissent in belief where as, if not for them, they would not. Some of these may maintain their dissenting opinion onwards, which they never would have had if not for them. But they know, that for every human being their phony “movement” affects in this manner, many more the deception will be complete upon, causing them to dismiss the unorthodox claim, erroneously believing that this is their rational decision, based on information presented on a fair and balanced media in a free country.