VA Barometer 2010/11 in English

2010/11

MIXED ATTITUDES TO RESEARCH • Confidence in researchers is on the decline.

• An increasing number of Swedes believe that astrology is a science. va Barometer 2010/11 – va Report 2010:6 issn: 1653-6843 isbn: 978-91-85585-59-5 (printed) urn:nbn:se:vetenskapochallmanhet-2010-6-eng (pdf ) Published by: Vetenskap & Allmänhet, VA PO Box 5073, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden Telephone: +46 (0)8 791 30 48 Fax: +46 (0)8 611 56 23 E-mail: info@v-a.se Website: www.v-a.se Readers are welcome to quote from this report provided that VA is cited as the source.

• At the same time, confidence in the ability of research to slow climate change and increase economic growth in Sweden is strengthening.

These are a few of the results from VA’s annual barometer which is compiled using information from 1,000 telephone interviews with a representative sample of the Swedish population (aged 16 and over).

The interviews were conducted by market research company Novus between 28th September and 4th October 2010. This is the ninth barometer survey since VA (Public & Science) was formed in 2002. The VA barometer was produced with support from the Swedish Research Council.

CONTENTS Last year through Swedish eyes................................................6 Loss of confidence in researchers............................................. 8 Confidence in science still strong........................................... 10 Optimism about climate & economy........................................12 Stable attitudes to S&T developments....................................14 4 of 10: results must be useful................................................ 16 Science & technology, too difficult?........................................18 Are men intimidated by science?...........................................20 Most scientific? Medicine!......................................................... 22 Belief in astrology rising........................................................ 24 Differences between groups................................................... 26

5

Last year through swedish eyes A professor at the Swedish National Defence College is found guilty of plagiarism but is permitted to continue with his research

Oct

Mass vaccination against the “Swine Flu” virus H1N1 in Sweden

Nov

Barack Obama is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize

UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, COP15, fails to seal binding agreement

Dec

The Swedish Minister for the Environment is criticised for citing scientific reasons for licensed wolf hunting

2010

6

Jan

White Christmas and a cold and snowy winter along with sky-high electricity prices

Major earthquake in Haiti

The European Commission aims serious criticism at France for Roma deportation

The State Prosecutor opens a preliminary investigation into a gross bribery case in the City of Gothenburg Successful highenergy collisions take place at the LHC (Large Hadron Collider), CERN

Feb

March

AstraZeneca announces it will close its research facility in Lund

An oil rig explodes in the Mexican Gulf with enormous volumes of spilt oil

A professor in Gothenburg is accused of serious scientific fraud

The University Chancellor resigns after disagreements between him and the Swedish Minister for Research

April

May

June

Volcanic ash from Iceland cripples air traffic

The nationalist party Sweden Democrats get 5.7 per cent of the votes in the parliamentary elections

Record high temperatures in Russia resulting in major forest fires

July

Aug

Major floods in Pakistan Wikileaks publishes thousands of documents on the war in Afghanistan.

One of the company’s servers is located in Sweden

Sept

Oct

“A fundamental reform of the IPCC management structure is needed” according to a review report An American federal court bans the use of federal funds for embryonic stem cell research

8

LOSS OF CONFIDENCE IN RESEARCHERS Confidence in researchers remained fairly stable up until 2009 with an apparent increase in 2008. But the down-shift in attitudes detected in last year’s barometer is now clearly reinforced by a loss of over ten percentage points in the number of respondents who have a high or very high level of confidence in researchers. The level now stands at 63 per cent. Confidence in researchers within companies stands at 45 per cent, its lowest level to date.

However the percentage of people who have very little or no confidence at all has increased only marginally. Instead the shift has been in the number of middle range or “don’t know” responses.

Level of education is an important factor in confidence (see insert).

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who answered that they have a high or very high level of confidence in researchers (on a scale from 1 to 5, where 5=very high level of confidence and 1=none at all).

100 %

Researchers at universities 80 %

63 %

60 %

45 % 40 %

Researchers within companies Group

20 %

0%

With a higher education With upper secondary education With 9-year compulsory education Men Women

2003

2004

2005

2006

Universities

Companies

73 % 62 % 49 % 67 % 60 %

49 % 45 % 38 % 49 % 41 %

2007

2008

2009

2010

10

Confidence in science still strong Confidence in the potential of science is still strong in many areas, notably environmental, energy, medical and climate research. In other areas such as terrorism and education, expectations are lower.

People who are more highly educated often have more confidence in the potential of science and research, but this does not apply to all fields. People with only the nine-year compulsory education are slightly more optimistic than others about issues concerning handling emergency situations and improving schools.

More men (81 %) than women (68 %) believe that research can lead to increased economic growth in Sweden. Men are less optimistic than women about the possibility of slowing climate change (23 % answered no to this question compared to 18 % of women).

... find more efficient and more eco-friendly energy sources ... slow the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria

77 %

... slow climate change

2009

... increase economic growth in Sweden

2009

 (+6) 75 %

 (+12) 74 %

... strengthen our society’s ability to handle emergencies, such as terrorism or a financial crisis

67 %

... increase the percentage of students who are qualified to enter upper secondary education after completing the 9-year compulsory education

55 %

... counteract terrorism 0%

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who believe that there is a good chance that research will help to… (response options: yes/no)

89 %

46 % 20 %

40 %

60 %

80 %

100 %

12

OPTIMISM ABOUT CLIMATE & ECONOMY Confidence in the potential of science and research to help the climate increased significantly in 2005 and the level continued to rise to a new high in 2010.

Three out of four respondents believe that research can help slow climate change. Disappointment following the COP15 climate conference and criticism aimed at the UN’s climate panel, IPCC, does not seem to have reduced this level of confidence.

More and more people feel that science can help increase economic growth in Sweden, compared with the dip in confidence with respect to this area during the recession and financial crisis. Reports about economic recovery may have contributed to a generally more positive view of economic growth.

Percentage of respondents who believe that, over the next decade, there is a good chance that research will help to‌ (response alternatives: yes/no).

100 %

80 %

75 % 74 %

... increase economic growth in Sweden

60 %

... slow climate change

40 %

Economic growth: Men 81 % yes 15 % no, Women 68 % yes 22 % no

20 %

Climate change: Men 73 % yes 23 % no, Women 77 % yes 18 % no

0%

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

14

Stable attitudes to S&T developments Eight out of ten respondents believe that scientific developments over the past two decades have made life better. The same high number also has a positive view of technological development. These levels have remained fairly stable since the start of the VA barometer in 2003, but before this, attitudes to technology were not as optimistic.* The view that scientific developments have made life better gets stronger as the age of the respondents rises. Conversely, young people have a more positive attitude towards technological developments than older people do, perhaps because young people are the main users of new technologies.

Differences are small with regards to level of education.

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who believe that scientific and technological developments over the past two decades have made life better or much better (five-point scale from much better to much worse).

100 % Technological 79 %

80 % Scientific 60 %

40 %

20 %

0%

16 – 29 years 65+ years Men Women

Scientific 65 % 86 % 80 % 79 %

Technological 85 % 73 % 84 % 74 %

People with a higher education have a more positive attitude to scientific development than others. The percentage of people who answered that it has made life much better are as follows: • People with a higher education 47 % • People with upper secondary education 34 % • People with a nine-year compulsory education 28 %

1978 1980 1982 1994 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 * Surveys results from 1978 to 1994 are presented and discussed in Public perceptions of science, biotechnology and a new university, Björn Fjæstad, Mitthögskolan Report 1996:10, ISSN 1104-294X.

16

4 of 10: results must be useful Research that is perceived as “useful” and relevant to people’s everyday lives is given a higher priority than other research in VA’s surveys. Just over four in ten respondents agree that “Researchers should only conduct research that it is believed can yield useful results.” This is a slightly lower figure than last year, but viewed over time since 2003, the level has remained stable.

However, over 60 per cent of people agreed in another statement ”It is important to conduct research that does not have useful results as its primary objective” when this question was last asked in 2008. Many people agreed with both statements.

100 %

80 %

60 %

43 %

40 %

20 %

People with a higher education: 33 % People with upper secondary education: 43 % People with nine-year compulsory education: 60 %

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who agree completely or largely that “Researchers should only conduct research that it is believed can yield useful results.”

0%

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2010

18

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, TOO DIFFICULT? Four out of ten respondents believe that science and technology are too difficult for most people to understand. The level seems to have stabilised following a drop from a distinctly higher level when first measured in 2002. 25 percent of people totally disagree with this statement.

Women are more likely to agree than men. Young people and those with a higher education agree the least with the statement that science and technology are too difficult to understand.

The question was posed to half of the survey participants. The other half was given a related alternative question (see next page).

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who agree completely or largely or do not agree at all with the statement “Science and technology are too difficult for most people to understand.”

60 % Agree: men 35 %, women 45 %, with 9-year compulsory education 50 %, with upper secondary education 40 %, with a higher education 34 %, 16–29 years 24 %, 65+ years 61 %.

50 % Agree completely or largely 40 %

40 %

30 % 25 % Do not agree at all

20 %

Do not agree at all: men 29 %, women 22 %, with 9-year compulsory education 18 %, with upper secondary education 24 %, with a higher education 32 %, 16–29 years 34 %, 65+ years 17 %

10 %

0%

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

20

ARE MEN INTIMIDATED

BY SCIENCE? Half of the participants in the survey were asked to respond to the alternative statement “Science is too difficult for most people to under­ stand.” Overall the same proportion of people, 44 percent, agreed with this statement as with the statement on “science and technology”.

There were however differences. The percentage of women who agree is the same for both questions, but men agree to a greater extent when the question asks about science. For men, it seems that the term science and technology sounds less difficult than science.

Young people and those with a higher education are less likely to believe that science is too difficult to understand, compared to older people and people with a low level of education. The patterns with respect to age and education are similar for both questions.

Percentage who agree completely or largely that “Science and technology are / science is too difficult for most people to understand.”

100 % Men Women 80 %

60 % 45 % 40 %

43 %

45 %

35 %

20 %

0%

Science and technology

Science

22

MOST SCIENTIFIC? MEDICINE! Surveys looking at the public’s attitudes to science often include questions about how scientific different subjects are. The VA barometer has shown year on year that medicine and natural sciences are considered more scientific than social sciences or humanities.

Astronomy is considered scientific by 67 per cent in 2010 – up from 53 per cent in 2009. Chemistry is also considered more scientific than before.

In general, people with a higher level of education consider all subjects to be more scientific than people with a lower level of education do.

An explanation of all subjects was provided at the interview in order to avoid misunderstandings.

The chart shows the percentage of respondents who consider different subjects to be scientific (4 or 5 on a scale from 1 to 5, where 5=to the highest degree and 1=not at all scientific).

95 %

Medicine** Chemistry

2006

Astronomy

2009

 (+14) 67 % 62 %

Information technology* Economics*

2005

Business administration*

2008

40 % 2005

 (-4) 32 % 24 %

Religious science Theology* 0%

 (+2) 56 %

 (+7) 47 %

Law Philosophy

 (+9) 77 %

* 2009 ** 2008

17 % 20 %

40 %

60 %

80 %

The figures in brackets refer to the change since the last measurement. The subjects are rotated between the years and different subjects are measured with varying frequency.

100 %

24

Belief in astrology rising One out of five believe that astrology is a science – an increase of seven percentage points since the lowest level recorded in 2008. The percentage of people who believe that astrology is not at all scientific has dropped from 46 per cent in 2008 to 34 per cent in 2010.

Young people are more likely to believe that astrology is scientific than older people. Young women in particular regard astrology as scientific. Only one in three women between the ages of 16 and 29 responded 4 or 5 on the scale. When the question is asked, astrology is described as “the study of the impact of the signs of the zodiac on our lives.”

Questions about astrology are commonly used in opinion surveys to gauge the level of scientific knowledge. The percentage of Swedes who believe astrology to be scientific is low when compared internationally.

The graph shows the percentage of respondents who believe that astrology is scientific (4 or 5 on a scale from 1 to 5), or not at all scientific (1).

50 % Not at all scientific: men 40 %, women 28 %

40 % 34 % Not at all scientific

30 %

Scientific 21 %

20 %

10 %

0%

Scientific: 16–29 years 27 %, others 19 %

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

26

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GROUPS

VA Reports 02–10 2002:1 2002:2 2002:3 2002:4

What do people in other countries think?

The public’s view of science Researchers’ views on dialogue with the public How young people view science

The most important differences in attitudes:

2003:1 2003:2

2003:3 2003:4 2003:5

Science in society VA studies under the microscope: Perspectives on science 2002 How the public views science 2003 How researchers view Public & Science* Researchers’ views on dialogue with the public

2004:1 2004:2

2004:3 2004:4 2004:5 2004:6

Science in society Teachers’ attitudes towards science and research-based knowledge How the public views science 2004 How teachers view science* Researchers’ views on dialogue with the public What do people in other countries think, 2004?

2005:1 2005:2 2005:3 2005:4 2005:5 2005:6

Science in society Teachers on entrepreneurship Eurobarometers on science, 2005 How the public views science, 2005 Science in the press How journalists view science*

2006:1 2006:2 2006:3 2006:4

Science in society How politicians view science Science in the political press Eighteen voices on the relationship between researchers and politicians

• Level of education is the most important and the most differentiating factor. People with a higher level of education have in general a more positive attitude towards research and researchers than those with a lower level of education.

• Young people have “less respect” for science and technology than older people, and often have more confidence in the ability of science to solve problems. Young people are slightly more likely to believe that astrology is a science.

• Gender is in some cases a differentiating factor, for example in attitudes to technical development, confidence in the potential of research to help increase economic growth, and with regard to whether astrology is a science.

Reports marked with an asterisk (*) are available in English.

2006:5 2006:6 2006:7 2006:8 2006:9

Politics and science* How the public views science, 2006 Stockholm politicians’ view of science Politics and science –a literature survey The public on Carl Linnaeus, 2006

2007:1 2007:2 2007:3 2007:4 2007:5 2007:6 2007:7 2007:8

Journalists on research Science in society How the public views science, 2007 Young people’s views on science Young people on knowledge Crazy, confused and evil?

Projects with no effect?

Knowledge rocks! Summary of a youth study by VA*

2008:1 2008:2 2008:3 2008:4 2008:5 2008:6

After the Linnaeus anniversary Science in society Myself as a researcher* The value of knowledge in the business world Knowledge in transition* VA barometer 2008*

2009:1 2009:2 2009:3 2009:4

Science in society VA barometer 2009/10* Knowledge you can believe in?

ODE – Public Engagement and Dialogue

2010:1 2010:2 2010:3 2010:4 2010:5 2010:6

Science in society Knowledge in a class by itself ?

A feel for knowledge Science & Values – a summary* Research in the Swedish general election 2010 VA barometer 2010/11*

27

28

VA (Public & Science) is a Swedish association which aims to promote dialogue and openness between the general public – especially the young – and researchers. The association endeavours to stimulate new forms of dialogue in unconventional arenas on issues that concern people, and to connect these issues to science. VA is a non-for-profit membership organisation, with diverse members from across Swedish society including organisations, public authorities, companies, universities and individuals.

Read more at www.v-a.se