3 minute read
State plans to launch statewide crime ‘heat map’
BY SARAH MEARHOFF VTDigger
As part of a widespread plan from the executive branch to curb crime in Vermont, the state Department of Public Safety is poised to launch a public dashboard identifying communities with the highest volume of police calls.
The department is already using the map internally, and top officials say a public launch is intended to give Vermonters a transparent view of public safety concerns in near-real time.
Early skeptics, however, say the map gives the misleading impression that Vermont’s cities are disproportionately dangerous. The brightest “hot spots” simply show concentrations of population, they pointed out this week, arguing that, without context, the map is likely to stoke unnecessary fear among the public.
Introducing the dashboard at a policy briefing for legislators last week, Public Safety Commissioner Jennifer Morrison told lawmakers that the map identifies Vermont’s “hottest” communities, where police departments receive the greatest number of phone calls for accusations of domestic violence, assault, drug-related activity, burglary, robbery, homicide and more.
The map is a six-month snapshot of calls made to police — not arrests or convictions — and plans are to update it weekly. Morrison told VTDigger that, although call data can be imperfect or even inaccurate, the goal of the heat map is speed.
“It’s not perfect data, and we’re not searching for perfect,” she said. “We’re … more focused on as close to real-time as possible. If you wait for some of these datasets to be fully vetted, and as accurate as possible, you’re talking about probably a three- or four-month lag, and that’s not exactly what we’re aiming for.”
When the map was presented to lawmakers last week, one legislator asked Morrison whether she believed the heat map had the potential to stoke unnecessary fear among the public. Morrison said then, and reiterated in an interview, that Vermonters should keep in mind when looking at the map that Vermont remains among the safest states in the nation. “This might look like a lot, and maybe it’s not,” Morrison said.
The intent of the map isn’t to incite fear, Morrison said, but transparency with the public to “enhance their understanding of what’s going on in their community and across the Vermont landscape.”
“In terms of making a choice about going out to dinner in Barre, or whatever, it allows people to make informed choices based on the reality of what’s being reported in that community,” Morrison said.
Falko Schilling, advocacy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont, told VTDigger on Thursday that he supports data transparency. In fact, “adequate data has been a consistent problem throughout the system,” he said.
But, he added, “I think it’s important that the public contextualize it, and it is not used as a way to stoke narratives about safety in Vermont when we con - tinue to remain one of the safest states in the entire nation.”
Schilling said he’s concerned that the map could be used to justify rolling back recent criminal justice reforms, or instituting tough-on-crime practices.
“One thing that we have seen over the last couple of years is, there has been a consistent drumbeat trying to make Vermonters think that they’re not as safe as they actually are, and some of that is based on opposition to reforms that have been enacted, or reforms that might be enacted,” Schilling said Thursday.
In his inaugural address earlier this month, Gov. Phil Scott called on the Legislature to take “a sincere look at well-intentioned reforms that are having unintended consequences” in the public safety sphere.
Chit - tenden County State’s Attorney Sarah George told VTDigger last Thursday that the map is misleading. On a screenshot provided by the department last week, the Burlington metro area is the clearest hotspot in Vermont, a blotch of bright orange depicting 763 calls made to the
Burlington Police Department in the previous six months. But looking at the police calls per capita, Burlington ranked fourth in the state, behind Rutland, Barre and Bennington.
“This is really an incomplete snapshot,” George said. “First of all, we don’t know the details of these calls. We don’t know whether they’re corroborated or confirmed in any way, whether they lead to arrest or prosecution.”
“If this map has been used to show where resources are going to be dumped or used, then I think that that would be beneficial to the communities,” George added. “But if it’s being used to show these communities are less safe … I think it’s disingenuous and doesn’t serve any real public safety goal, other than some sort of public shaming.”
Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington, the longtime chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the map is reminiscent of Rutland’s Project VISION, a local initiative targeting key neighborhoods with increased public resources in order to prevent crime. Following through with resources is the key, Sears said.
“If all we’re going to do is tell people, ‘This particular street in Montpelier is dangerous,’ that doesn’t do any good if we’re not going to do something about it. That’s the critical piece,” Sears said. “I mean, I can tell you that