b <Relative FTS Production Expense>
Energy Shocks
<Relative FTS <Relative FTS Distribution Expense> Processing Expense>
Climate Shocks Economic Shocks
<FTS Demand Affordability>
With the Community
<Relative Value of FTS* vs Non-FTS>
% of Decision Makers Aware of FTS Value
Q&Q of Shared Learnings
Q of Coordination Systems
Q of IT Design & Support
<Q&Q of Ideological Resistance> <Satisfaction/ Serving>
Meal Planning
-
Q of Supply Awareness
Q of Q of School Network Awareness Awareness
Kids' Satisfaction
Demand Ease of Use
Serving Preparing
Ability to Coordinate at Scale
Q of Network Market Awareness Legality of the Coordination Systems Abililty to Match Demand & Q of Bid Supply Timing
% FTS Market/ Network Coordination
<% FTS Policy Demand>
% FTS Food System Decision Makers Committed to FTS
Collections
Supply Ease of Use
internalizing
School Admin, Teachers & Staff Curriculum Ease of Use Flexibility Timing Flexibility Forecasting
Relative FTS Production Labor Costs Ability to Innovate Production
<Q&Q of Shared Learnings>
Fulfillment
<% FTS Policy Demand>
<Q of FTS Food Service Commitment>
Relative Water Quality
Relative Nutrient Content/ Serving
Q of Food Service Skills Taste Quality
<Ability to Innovate Production>
Q of FTS Food Service Commitment
<Ability to Innovate Processing> <Ability to Innovate Distribution>
-
<% FTS Supply>
externalizing
Q of FTS School Leadership
<Q of Experience of Food as an Honorable Profession>
Relative Freshness & Ripeness
Q of Admin
Q of Champion(s)
<Relative Educational Value>
School Board's Democratic Q&Q of FTS Responsiveness Students & Parents
% FTS Schools Demand Q of School Board FTS Leadership Q&Q of Teacher & Staff FTS Commitment
<FTS Ease of Use>
% FTS Demand
FTS Demand Affordability
Available Tax Base Willingness & Ability to Subsidize
Tax Rate
Q&Q of Ideological Resistance
-
-
% Business Policy Demand
<% FTS Food System Decision Makers Committed to FTS>
FTS Supply Profitablity
Relative FTS Processing Labor Costs
<% FTS Market/ Network Coordination>
% FTS Supply
% FTS Processing Supply
% FTS Distribution Supply
-
<Q&Q of Shared Learnings>
-
<% FTS Policy Demand>
Other Relative FTS Distribution Expenses - Relative FTS Distribution Investment Relative FTS Distribution Cost of Capital
<Q of FTS Food Service Commitment> Relative FTS Distribution Productivity
Relative FTS Distribution Expense
Ability to Innovate Processing <Q&Q of Shared Learnings>
<Revenue/ Meal>
Relative FTS Distribution Income
<% FTS Policy Demand>
% Revenue to Distribution Relative FTS Distribution Profit
Distribution Risk Mgmt Ability Other Distribution Risk Mgmt Ability
-
Other Relative FTS Processing Expenses Relative FTS Processing Investment
Relative FTS Processing Cost of Capital -
Relative FTS Processing Productivity
Relative FTS Processing Expense
% Retail & Restaurant Demand
% FTS Policy Demand
Processing Risk Mgmt Ability Other Processing Risk Mgmt Ability
State's Democratic Responsiveness
% State Policy Demand
<% FTS Market/ Network Coordination> Q&Q of Policy Leadership
<Revenue/ Meal>
Relative FTS Processing Income
Q of Citizen Leadership
% FTS Community Demand
% Citizen Demand
% School Boards Policy Demand
-
% Federal Policy Demand
Federal Democratic Responsiveness -
Relative FTS Processing Profit
% Revenue to Processing
<% FTS Market/ Network Coordination>
Q of NGO Leadership
# of <Relative Revenue/ Cost/ Students Meal Economic Value> Meal
-
Ability to Innovate Distribution
Production* = Farms, School Gardens, Hoop gardens, etc.
gaining
Relative Land Quality
<Revenue/ % Revenue to Relative FTS Meal> Production Production Other Relative Productivity FTS Production Expenses - Relative FTS Relative FTS - Relative FTS Relative FTS Production Production Production Production Investment Income Profit Expense Relative FTS Cost of Production Capital Risk Mgmt Ability % FTS Other Production* <Acres in Supply Production FTS Risk Mgmt Production>
Relative FTS Distribution Labor Costs
Q&Q = Quality & Quantity
Relative Environmental Value
Relative Aesthetic Value
Farm-to-School Food by 2020 causing a Cultural Shift to % Healthy, Sustainble, Local, Equitable Food Citizens
<Relative FTS Distribution Profit>
Q = Quality
Relative Recreational Value
<FTS Supply Profitablity>
Acres in FTS Production
losing
Relative Value of FTS* vs Non-FTS
Practicality
Development
Relative Air Quality
<Relative FTS Production Profit>
<Relative FTS Processing Profit>
Legend:
Relative Economic Value
Fun & Meaning
non-FTS production
Relative Preparation
Flexible (Alternative) Pathways
Agriculture
Q of IT Skills & Resources
<FTS Demand Affordability>
FTS* = Healthy, Local, Sustainable, Equitable Farm-to-School Food *Experienciing = the 3C's = Classroom, Cafeteria, Community
Relative Selection Relative Experiential Value
Relative Presentation
Health Care Savings
Relative Tourism Value
Experientiality
Relative Sharing & Eating
Q of Experience of Food as an Honorable Science Profession Relative Relative Small Career & LIfe CraftsNutritional/ Health Business, Educational manship Educational Ordering Integrative Math Value Value etc. Value Educational Absence Food Value of Toxins Economics, System Satisfaction/ Physics etc. Receiving & Education Food Serving Storing Expertise Culture History <FTS Ease <Q of Food of Use> Service Skills> <% FTS <% FTS % Kids in % Schools Experiencing* % <% FTS Demand> Demand> Supply> Healthy, Local, Sustainable, Equitable -
FTS Ease of Use
Bidding & Contracting
Relative Local Economic Multiplier
Cultural Value
Experiencing Change
Experiencing Empowerment
Relative Growing
With Families
Political/ Democratic Changemaker
% FTS Food System Decision Makers Convinced of FTS Value
Q of Demand Awareness Willingness to Collaborate
With School Personnel
Relative Social Value
With Marginalized Citizens
Experiencing Reality
Q&Q of Awareness Programs
Food Supply Economic Value
With Students
With Citizens
With Food Supply
<FTS Supply Profitablity>
Relative Food Security Value -
Food Security Risk Mgmt Ability
<Relative Economic Value> <Relative Food Security Value> Q&Q of Competitive Resistance <Ability to Innovate Production> <Ability to Innovate Processing> <Ability to Innovate Distribution>
% Institutional Demand
<Relative Nutritional/ Health Value>