2 minute read

Legacy admissions outdated C

Next Article
vs.

vs.

While it might seem fair or even “nobody else’s business” to people who have legacy status, using it to determine admission is unfair.

The college admissions process can be one of the most critical times in a student’s life, and there are many factors that determine the results.

Verde believes college admissions should not consider legacy because they are the gatekeeper to higher education and future opportunities that come with it.

According to a 2022 article from College Transitions, primary legacy applicants are 45% more likely to get into a highly competitive college than a non-legacy applicant. In addition to this, according to the book “Poison Ivy,” elite schools typically reserve 10-25% of the admitted class for legacies.

Because of this advantage, the role of legacy in college admissions has long been a controversial topic. A 2020 Wall Street Journal stated that more than half of the United States’ top 250 universities consider legacy as a part of their admissions process. The additional thought given is believed to have originated from elite institutions to ensure that the children of alumni — who were often also great donors — would continue to support the school and its reputation.

According to a 2020 article in Center for American Progress, the legacy admissions process originated from an idea to keep Jewish students from attending the school but has since grown into affecting multiple groups. The article reported that generally, there are usually more total legacy students admitted than African American, Latino or Native American students.

An article in The Atlantic reported that today, colleges often defend the continuation of legacy admissions by claiming that it’s needed for funding by alumni.

Palo Alto High School junior Jonathan Liu, who is a legacy, said that considering legacy is the most effective way to reward alumni for their financial support to their alma mater.

“It [the legacy admissions process] respects the alumni,” Liu said.

From an opposing view, some legacies like seniors Anna Markesky and Elizabeth Fetter say that universities don’t have to find other ways to honor alumni.

“I feel like universities aren’t obligated to [honor alumni],” Markesky said.

Fetter echoed this sentiment.

“You are paying the school to go there and receive an education, and you should honor the school, not really the other way around,” Fetter said.

According to an ERN Memorandum document, having generations of the same family attend the same university campus decreases student diversity on campus.

“It’s a smaller scope of the same generations of people,” Fetter said. “Especially if the legacy is from 60 years ago, it’s going to be mostly white males who had that legacy.”

While the intention behind legacy admissions may be a way to honor alumni, it is important to consider the potential negative impacts as well as ensure that the process is equitable for all students. Universities should focus on creating a fair and inclusive admissions path for all. v

This article is from: