PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY ON FINANCIAL AID TO THIRD COUNTRIES
October 2022
METHODOLOGY
METHODOLOGY USED IN THE SURVEY
L AIKAS
PERIOD
October 18 28, 2022 AIM
2022 01 01 02 02
TIKSL AS Išsiaiškinti ...
To find out public opinion regarding financial aid to third countries
TIKSLINĖ GRUPĖ
TARGET GROUP Residents aged 18 to 75
Šalies gyventojai nuo 18 iki 75 metų amžiaus
APKL AUSOS METODAS
METHODOLOGY
Kombinuotas metodas: CATI (Computer AssistedTelephone Interview)ir CAWI (Computer AssistedWEB Interview) .
Combined method: CATI Interview)and CAWI (Computer AssistedWEB Interview)
SCOPE SELECTION LOCATION DATA ANALYSIS
IMTIS ATRANKA LOKACIJA DUOMENŲ ANALIZ
Ė
In total, 1,011 respondents par ticipated in the sur vey
Tyrimo metu buvo apklausta ... respondentų.
Tyrime naudotas kvotinės atrankos metodas
Visa šalies teritorija. Analizė atlikta SPSS/PC programine įranga. Ataskaitoje pateikiami bendrieji atsakymų pasiskirstymai (procentai), ir pasiskirstymai pagal socialines demografines charakteristikas (Žr Priedus)
Quota selection method Lithuanian territor y Data analysis was implemented using the SPSS/PC sof tware. This repor t presents general response distribution in percentage and response distribution according to socio demographic characteristics (see Appendix).
STATISTICAL ERROR
In quantitative sur veys there always remains the possibility of statistical error, which must be taken into account when interpreting data. E. g., if 29,6% out of 1,011 respondents say they know or have heard of development cooperation, then there is a 95% probability that the actual number is somewhere between 26,8% and 32,4%.
As the number of analysed responses decreases, the exactitude of estimate also decreases. The following is a table that helps to assess statistical error.
% = 3 /97 5 /95 10 /90 15 /85 2 0/80 2 5/75 3 0/70 40 /60 5 0/50
N = 10 10,6 13,5 18,6 22,1 24,8 26,8 28,4 30,4 31,0 3 0 6,1 7,8 10,7 12,8 14,3 15,5 16,4 17,5 17,9 5 0 4,7 6,0 8,3 9,9 11,1 12,0 12,7 13,6 13,9 7 5 3,9 4,9 6,8 8,1 9,1 9,8 10,4 11,1 11,3 100 3,3 4,3 5,9 7,0 7,8 8,5 9,0 9,6 9,8 15 0 2,7 3,5 4,8 5,7 6,4 6,9 7,3 7,8 8,0 2 00 2,4 3,0 4,2 4,9 5,5 6,0 6,4 6,8 6,9 3 00 1,9 2,5 3,4 4,0 4,5 4,9 5,2 5,5 5,7 400 1,7 2,1 2,9 3,5 3,9 4,2 4,5 4,8 4,9 5 00 1,5 1,9 2,6 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,3 4,4 6 00 1,4 1,7 2,4 2,9 3,2 3,5 3,7 3,9 4,0 700 1,3 1,6 2,2 2,6 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,7 8 00 1,2 1,5 2,1 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,5 10 00 1,1 1,4 1,9 2 ,2 2 ,5 2 ,7 2 ,8 3 ,0 3 ,1
4
47 53 11 21 21 20 27 28 67 5 13 41 27 19 7 35 25 5 2 6 13 5 2 24 63 13 45 27 28 CEO/Upper or middle level Manager Specialist, employee W orker, technical worker Small business owner Farm er Unemployed Pensioner Student, pupil Housewife Sex Age Education Monthly incomeper householdmember Primary occupation Place ofresidence Family status Male Female 18-25 26-35 36-45 46 55 56+ Higher education (University) graduate or undergraduate Secondary / Special education Unfinished secondary education Up to 300 EUR 301 500 EUR 501 700 EUR More than 700 EUR Single Married or lives in an unregistered marriage Other Big cities Other cities or towns Countryside
SURVEY RESULTS
Respondents with higher income and a background in higher education more often than others respond that they have heard something about development cooperation.
Respondents with lower education more often than others know nothing about development cooperation
7 Do you know what development cooperation is? KNOWLEDGE OF THE TERM “DEVELOPMENT
(%)
COOPERATION“
N =1011 30% do know 6 24 70 3 19 78 Taip, žinau Taip, teko kažką girdėti Ne, nežinau N =1010 Oct ober 2022 M ay 2021 Yes, I know Yes, I’ve heard about it No, I don’t know
8
82% think that it is
19 63 13 5 14 57 21 8 N =1011 N =1010 Oct ober 2022 M ay 2021 Yes,
it More
More
No,
Inyouropinion,isitworthhelpingpeoplewholiveineconomicallylessdevelopedcountries? PUBLIC OPINION ON GIVING AID TO PEOPLE IN ECONOMICALLY LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES (%)
worth helping
it is worth
likely worth it
likely not worth it
it is not worth it
Respondents in the age group above 35 years of age, with middle and lower income, more often than others indicate that they do not know what Agenda 2030 is.
9 Do you know what the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the UnitedNations are (Agenda 2030)? KNOWLEDGE OF THE 17 SUSTAINABLE
OF THE UNITED NATIONS (%)
25% do know N =1008 N =1010 5 3 3 20 19 21 75 78 76 2022 m. 2021 m. 2019 m. Taip, žinau Taip, teko kažką girdėti Ne, nežinau N =1011 Yes, I know Yes, I’ve heard about it No, I don’t know
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
Men and residents of big cities are more likely to agree to assign part of tax money for poverty reduction in less wealthy countries.
Women are less likely to agree.
1 0
agree thatpart ofthe taxes paid were assigned forpoverty reduction in less wealthycountries?
TO ASSIGN PART OF TAX
FOR POVERT Y REDUCTION IN
(%)
Wouldyou
AGREEMENT
MONEY
THIRD COUNTRIES
52% would agree N =1008 N =1010 11 8 10 41 37 34 30 29 29 18 26 27 2022 m. 2021 m. 2019 m. Taip, pritarčiau Greičiau pritarčiau Greičiau nepritarčiau Ne, nepritarčiau N =1011 Yes, I would agree More likely agree More likely disagree No, I wouldn’t agree
PRINCIPLE (%)
For women it is more often important that fund money were invested under the sustainable investment principle. Respondents aged 26 35 more often say that it is likely important.
1 1
Ifyou wereplanning to putyour money into an investment fund , how important wouldit be for you that its investments were made under the sustainable investmentprinciple , i. e. money was investedin transparent, socially responsible , and environment friendlybusinesses?
INVESTING
THE IMPORTANCE OF
FUND MONEY UNDER THE SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT
for 78% it would be impor tant N =1008 N =1010 32 27 24 46 48 47 15 15 17 7 10 12 2022 m. 2021 m. 2019 m. N =1011 Very important Likely important Likely unimportant Not important at all
ASSESSMENT OF ACTIONS TAKEN BY LITHUANIAN NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS IN ORGANISING HELP FOR UKRAINIANS (%)
How do you assess the workof Lithuanian non governmentalorganisations in organising help for Ukrainians?
N =1011
Respondents with higher education and the highest income more often assess the work of Lithuanian NGOs in organising help for Ukrainians as very positive
Respondents with lower education assess it more likely negatively.
1 2
86% positively Very positively 32 % Negatively 4 % More likely positively 54 % More likely negatively 10 %
GENERAL OVERVIE W
GENERAL OVERVIEW
• 30% of respondents claim to know what development cooperation is: 6% know, 24% have heard something about it (up from 19% in 2021). 70% don’t know what it is (down from 78% in 2021).
• 82% believe that it is wor th helping people in economically less developed countries: 19% say it is wor th it (up from 14%), 63% say it is more likely wor th it (up from 57%). 18% of respondents are of a contrar y opinion: 13% say it is more likely not wor th it (down from 21%) and 5% say it is not wor th it.
• 25% of respondents claim to know what Agenda 2030 is: 5% know, 20% have heard something about it. 75% say they do not know.
• 52% of respondents agree to the proposal to assign par t of the taxes they paid to pover ty reduction in less wealthy countries: 11% would agree, 41% would more likely agree (up from 37%). 48% would not agree to this proposal: 30% would more likely disagree and 18% would disagree (down from 26%).
• 78% or sur vey par ticipants say it is impor tant to them that funds were invested under the sustainable investment principle: for 32% it is ver y impor tant (up from 27%) and for 46% it is more likely impor tant.
• 86% of respondents positi vely assess the work of Lithuanian NGOs in organising help to Ukrainians: 32% ver y positively and 54% more likely positively. 14% of respondents assess the work of Lithuanian NGOs in organising help to Ukrainians negatively: 10% more likely negatively and 4% negatively.
1 4
UAB Spinter tyrimai info@spinter.lt tel. 863720595 Kontaktinė informacija Contacts for more information