/CLCMarch1presentation30607

Achieving the Dream, Fall, 2006 Findings Supplemental Learning (SL) Learning in Community (LinC) Student Success (SLS)

Supplemental Learning Findings – Fall, 2006

Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006

SL Sections

Non-SL Sections

N = 1116

N = 5676

Other 13%

Other 12% Caucasian 42%

Afr. Am. 17%

Caucasian 39%

Afr. Am. 21%

Hispanic 28%

Hispanic 28%

(Includes all students enrolled in SL Fall 2006)

FTIC Degree-seeking Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006

SL Sections

Non-SL Sections

N = 409 FTIC’s

N = 2361 FTIC’s

Other 12%

Other 13% Caucasian 42%

Afr. Am. 21%

Caucasian 36% Afr. Am. 22%

Hispanic 25%

Hispanic 29%

(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)

Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006

SL Sections

Non-SL Sections

N = 1116

MAT1033 30%

N = 5676 MAT0012 22%

MAT0012 26% MAT1033 41%

MAT0024 48%

(Includes all students enrolled in SL Fall 2006)

MAT0024 33%

FTIC degree-seeking Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006

SL Sections

Non-SL Sections N = 2361 FTIC’s

N = 409 FTIC’s MAT1033 15%

MAT0024 55%

MAT0012 30%

MAT1033 30%

MAT0012 35%

MAT0024 35%

(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)

Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for All Students Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses SL vs. Non-SL Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas Other (n=143)

6

26

Afr. Am. (n=192)

7

23

38 30

11

Hispanic (n=317)

20%

11

Hispanic (n=1565)

no prep

80%

35 27

38 20% light

40% moderate

100%

26

29 31

0%

20

26

25

22

Caucausian (n=2220)

60%

29

13

29 26

40%

19

Afr. Am. (n=1192)

26 41

0%

Other (n=699)

40

34

13

Caucausian (n=464)

30

29 22

60% heavy

18 80%

100%

Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for FTIC Students Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses SL vs. Non-SL Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas 7

Other (n=75) Afr. Am. (n=95)

27

10

32

23

9

Hispanic (n=187)

27 35

13

Caucausian (n=234)

Afr. Am. (n=554) Hispanic (n=734)

23

20%

14

33

27

8

32

40%

20

0% no prep

25

light

80%

27

36

28

40% moderate

100%

29

27

32

41 20%

19

60%

30

10

Caucausian (n=1033)

40

43

0%

Other (n=28)

34

23 60% heavy

16 80%

100%

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55%

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

78 70

69 59

52 49 45

Afr. Am.

attended

56 57 49

56 55 47

46

Caucasian

non-attend

59 57

Hispanic

SL course

All non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55% 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

76 66 56

49 52 50

Afr. Am.

attended

50

55 59

44

Caucasian

non-attend

65

5660

Hispanic

SL course

58 54 49

All non-SL course

Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.

Who took advantage of attending the SL sessions?

41.5% (464/1116) of Students enrolled 42% (128/304) of the Heavy Mandate Level Participated 40% (127/314) of the Moderate Mandate Level Participated 41% (158/381) of the Light Mandate Level Participated 44% (51/117) of the No-prep Mandate Level Participated

39.5% (162/409) of FTIC Students enrolled 42% (45/108) of the Heavy Mandate Level Participated 38% (51/133) of the Moderate Mandate Level Participated 37% (50/135) of the Light Mandate Level Participated 48% (16/33) of the No-prep Mandate Level Participated

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55%

100 80

83

60 40

52

64 58

70

67 48

55 52

55 4646 40

5655 47

20 0

Light

attended

Moderate non-attend

Heavy

SL course

All non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of FTIC enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55% 100 80

86

60 40

6363 52

61 51 54 54

Light

Moderate

65 44 404244

58 54 49

20 0

attended

non-attend

Heavy

SL course

All non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55%

3 2.5 2

2.69 2.34 2.22 2.28

1.5

2.44 2.54 2.41

2.70

2.51 2.61

2.35

2.04

1 0.5 0

Afr. Am.

attended

Caucasian

non-attend

SL course

Hispanic non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity

55%

3 2.5 2

2.64 2.41 2.26 2.32

1.5

2.29

2.52

2.41

2.64 2.66 2.63

2.38

2.06

1 0.5 0

Afr. Am.

attended

Caucasian

non-attend

SL course

Hispanic non-SL course

Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55%

3 2.5 2

2.84 2.55

2.69

2.48

2.58

2.45 2.51

2.2

2.18 2.1 2.14

1.5

1.96

1 0.5 0

Light

attended

Moderate

non-attend

SL course

Heavy non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level

55%

3 2.5 2

2.96 2.34

2.58 2.61

2.62 2.56 2.58 2.28 1.88

1.5

2.06 1.97 1.98

1 0.5 0

Light

attended

Moderate

non-attend

SL course

Heavy non-SL course

Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.

FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Number of Sessions Attended by Ethnicity 55%

100 80 60

86 73 65

79 73 65

77 70 6365 49

4546

86

82 70 64 64 48

45

40 20 0 Af. Amer. none

Caucasian 1 to 2

Hispanic

3 to 5

6 to 10

All > 10

Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All Students with Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Number of Sessions Attended by Mandate Level 55%

100 80 60

838680 68

91 8480 75 58

50

81 67 62 58 53

40

72 60 52 47 38

20 0 No - Prep none

Light 1 to 2

Moderate 3 to 5

6 to 10

Heavy > 10

Supplemental Learning Campus Reports by Developmental Mathematics Course

Supplemental Learning – East Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

72

69

64

56 46

53

48

58 61

68

65

48

48

57 55

38

MAT0012 attended

MAT0024 non-attend

MAT1033 SL course

Total Campus

2.43

non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 45% of MAT0012, 44% of MAT0024, and 38% of MAT1033 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. East Campus total percent participation in SL is 42% of 527 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.

Supplemental Learning – Osceola Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%

100 80

90

89

74

67 65

58 62

60

65 64

48

43

40 20

17

0 MAT0024 attended

MAT1033 non-attend

SL course

Total Campus

2.43

non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 72% of MAT0024, and 58% of MAT1033 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Osceola Campus total percent participation in SL is 62% of 169 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.

Supplemental Learning – West Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%

60 50

56 48

51 51

56

56 47

50

48 50 40

40

45

30 20 10 0 MAT0012 attended

MAT0024 non-attend

SL course

Total Campus

2.43

non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 36% of MAT0012, and 30% of MAT0024 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. West Campus total percent participation in SL is 32% of 280 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.

Supplemental Learning – Winter Park Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

68

62 41

48

53

MAT0012 attended

66 51

57 46

MAT0024 non-attend

54 51 48

SL course

Total Campus

2.43

non-SL course

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 33% of MAT0012, and 37% of MAT0024 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Winter Park Campus total percent participation in SL is 36% of 140 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.

Learning in Community (LinC) Findings - Fall, 2006

FTIC Degree-seeking Population Enrolled in LinC – Fall, 2006

Non-LinC

LinC N = 150 FTIC Other 11%

N = 2270 FTIC

Caucasian 24%

Other 13% Caucasian 37% Afr. Am. 21%

Afr. Am. 34%

Hispanic 31%

Hispanic 29%

(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)

FTIC degree-seeking Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006

Non-LinC

LinC

N = 2770 FTIC’s

N = 150 FTIC’s MAT1033 22% MAT0012 35%

MAT0024 43%

MAT1033 28%

MAT0012 34%

MAT0024 38%

(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)

Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for FTIC Students Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses LinC vs. Non-LinC Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas 18

Other (n=17) Afr. Am. (n=51)

10

Hispanic (n=47)

18 19 15

14

0%

9

Hispanic (n=790)

32 40%

31

37 28

38 20% light

40% moderate

100%

22

33

20

no prep

80%

30

21

0%

20

60%

29

14

Caucausian (n=1032)

47

34

19

Afr. Am. (n=579)

53 21

20%

Other (n=369)

35

18

17

Caucausian (n=35)

29

27 23

60% heavy

19 80%

100%

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Ethnicity 55%

100 80 60

87 70

78 69

73

82

75

71

40 20 0

Afr. Am.

Caucasian SLS only

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

Hispanic SLS LinC

2.43

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Ethnicity 55%

100 80 60

88 70

86 71

72

85

79

72

40 20 0

Afr. Am.

Caucasian SLS only

Hispanic SLS LinC

2.43

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Mandate Level 100 80 60

55%

70 % 86 75

81 72

67

82

76

71

40 20 0

Light

Moderate SLS only

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

Heavy SLS LinC

2.43

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 100 80

Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Mandate Level 55% 70 % 91 79

60

74

85

83

77

72

65

40 20 0

Light

Moderate SLS only

Heavy SLS LinC

2.43

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Student Success

by Ethnicity 3.2 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4

55%

70 % 3.16 3.07

3.02

3.00 2.89

2.66

2.89

2.70

Afr. Am.

Caucasian SLS only

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

Hispanic SLS LinC

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Student Success by Ethnicity 3.2 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4

55%

70 % 3.12

3.10

3.04

2.97 2.82

2.85 2.77

2.65

Afr. Am.

Caucasian SLS only

Hispanic SLS LinC

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Student Success

by Mandate Level 3.2 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4

55%

70 % 3.12 3.05 3.02

3.00 2.85

2.89

2.80 2.66

Light

Moderate SLS only

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

Heavy SLS LinC

2.43

All

LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Student Success by Mandate Level 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3

55%

70 % 3.10

3.08

3.04

2.97

2.90

2.87

2.85

2.59

Light

Moderate SLS only

Heavy SLS LinC

2.43

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

55%

70 % 70 49

Afr. Am.

73

69 57

57

Caucasian Dev. Math

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

71

Hispanic

55

2.43

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55% 70 % 71 61

59

58

66

65 57

50

Afr. Am.

Caucasian Dev. Math

Hispanic

2.43

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

55%

70 % 75

74 59

Light

53

Moderate Dev. Math

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

68 56

55

46

Heavy

2.43

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55% 70 % 75

71

63

65

54

57

53 44

Light

Moderate Dev. Math

Heavy

2.43

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 3 2.5 2 1.5

55%

70 %

2.07 2.08

2.43

2.69

2.53

2.39

2.34

2.46

1 0.5 0

Afr. Am.

Caucasian Dev. Math

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

Hispanic

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 3 2.5 2 1.5

55%

70 % 2.74

2.50 2.57

2.41

2.10 2.02

2.48

2.44

1 0.5 0

Afr. Am.

Caucasian Dev. Math

Hispanic

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 3 2.5 2

55%

70 % 2.85 2.51 2.61

2.34 2.46

2.26 1.99 2.07

1.5 1 0.5 0

Light

Moderate Dev. Math

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

Heavy

2.43

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 3 2.5 2

55%

70 % 2.60 2.57

2.79 2.39 2.44

2.33 1.97 2.10

1.5 1 0.5 0

Light

Moderate Dev. Math

Heavy

2.43

Dev. Math LinC

All

LinC Campus Reports by Developmental Mathematics and Student Success Courses

East LinC – Developmental Math Fall 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics 55%

70 %

100

86 76

80 60

68

65 49

55

55

49

40 20 0 MAT0012

MAT0024 non-LinC

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

MAT1033

2.43

LinC

All Dev. Math

Osceola LinC–Developmental Math Fall 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

55%

70 % 77 62

66 55

MAT0024

SLS1122

2.43

non-LinC (Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

LinC

West LinC – Developmental Math Fall 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

55%

70 %

76

68

61

68

61

51

51 42

MAT0012

MAT0024 non-LinC

(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)

MAT1033

2.43

LinC

All Dev. Math

Student Success Findings Comparison Fall 2004 to Fall 2006 Cohort

FTIC Population Enrolled in Student Success – Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 Fall 2006

Fall 2004

N = 5834

N = 5027

SLS 27%

Non-SLS 73%

SLS 32%

Non-SLS 68%

“3-prep” FTIC Population Enrolled in Student Success – Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 Fall 2004

Fall 2006

N = 1105

N = 1196

SLS 37%

SLS 67%

Non-SLS 63%

Non-SLS 33%

SLS – Fall to Spring Retention Rates

by All FTIC Students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 83%

84% 82%

55%

81%

80%

78%

78%

76%

76% 74% 72% SLS % Fall 2004 ret Spring 2005

Non-SLS % Fall 2006 ret Spring 2007

SLS – Fall GPA by All FTIC students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 55%

2.6

2.56

2.55 2.5 2.43

2.45 2.4

2.45

2.39

2.35 2.3 SLS

Non-SLS Fall 2004

Fall 2006

SLS – Fall to Spring Retention Rates by “3-prep” mandate students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

55%

77%

80% 65%

SLS % Fall 2004 ret Spring 2005

69%

Non-SLS % Fall 2006 ret Spring 2007

SLS – Fall GPA by “3-prep” Mandate Students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 2.35 2.3 2.25 2.2 2.15 2.1 2.05 2 1.95 1.9

2.32 2.19 2.06

2.05

SLS

Non-SLS Fall 2004

Fall 2006