Achieving the Dream, Fall, 2006 Findings Supplemental Learning (SL) Learning in Community (LinC) Student Success (SLS)
Supplemental Learning Findings – Fall, 2006
Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections
Non-SL Sections
N = 1116
N = 5676
Other 13%
Other 12% Caucasian 42%
Afr. Am. 17%
Caucasian 39%
Afr. Am. 21%
Hispanic 28%
Hispanic 28%
(Includes all students enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
FTIC Degree-seeking Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections
Non-SL Sections
N = 409 FTIC’s
N = 2361 FTIC’s
Other 12%
Other 13% Caucasian 42%
Afr. Am. 21%
Caucasian 36% Afr. Am. 22%
Hispanic 25%
Hispanic 29%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections
Non-SL Sections
N = 1116
MAT1033 30%
N = 5676 MAT0012 22%
MAT0012 26% MAT1033 41%
MAT0024 48%
(Includes all students enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
MAT0024 33%
FTIC degree-seeking Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections
Non-SL Sections N = 2361 FTIC’s
N = 409 FTIC’s MAT1033 15%
MAT0024 55%
MAT0012 30%
MAT1033 30%
MAT0012 35%
MAT0024 35%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for All Students Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses SL vs. Non-SL Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas Other (n=143)
6
26
Afr. Am. (n=192)
7
23
38 30
11
Hispanic (n=317)
20%
11
Hispanic (n=1565)
no prep
80%
35 27
38 20% light
40% moderate
100%
26
29 31
0%
20
26
25
22
Caucausian (n=2220)
60%
29
13
29 26
40%
19
Afr. Am. (n=1192)
26 41
0%
Other (n=699)
40
34
13
Caucausian (n=464)
30
29 22
60% heavy
18 80%
100%
Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for FTIC Students Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses SL vs. Non-SL Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas 7
Other (n=75) Afr. Am. (n=95)
27
10
32
23
9
Hispanic (n=187)
27 35
13
Caucausian (n=234)
Afr. Am. (n=554) Hispanic (n=734)
23
20%
14
33
27
8
32
40%
20
0% no prep
25
light
80%
27
36
28
40% moderate
100%
29
27
32
41 20%
19
60%
30
10
Caucausian (n=1033)
40
43
0%
Other (n=28)
34
23 60% heavy
16 80%
100%
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55%
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
78 70
69 59
52 49 45
Afr. Am.
attended
56 57 49
56 55 47
46
Caucasian
non-attend
59 57
Hispanic
SL course
All non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55% 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
76 66 56
49 52 50
Afr. Am.
attended
50
55 59
44
Caucasian
non-attend
65
5660
Hispanic
SL course
58 54 49
All non-SL course
Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.
Who took advantage of attending the SL sessions? 41.5% (464/1116) of Students enrolled 42% (128/304) of the Heavy Mandate Level Participated 40% (127/314) of the Moderate Mandate Level Participated 41% (158/381) of the Light Mandate Level Participated 44% (51/117) of the No-prep Mandate Level Participated
39.5% (162/409) of FTIC Students enrolled 42% (45/108) of the Heavy Mandate Level Participated 38% (51/133) of the Moderate Mandate Level Participated 37% (50/135) of the Light Mandate Level Participated 48% (16/33) of the No-prep Mandate Level Participated
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55%
100 80
83
60 40
52
64 58
70
67 48
55 52
55 4646 40
5655 47
20 0
Light
attended
Moderate non-attend
Heavy
SL course
All non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of FTIC enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55% 100 80
86
60 40
6363 52
61 51 54 54
Light
Moderate
65 44 404244
58 54 49
20 0
attended
non-attend
Heavy
SL course
All non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55%
3 2.5 2
2.69 2.34 2.22 2.28
1.5
2.44 2.54 2.41
2.70
2.51 2.61
2.35
2.04
1 0.5 0
Afr. Am.
attended
Caucasian
non-attend
SL course
Hispanic non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
3 2.5 2
2.64 2.41 2.26 2.32
1.5
2.29
2.52
2.41
2.64 2.66 2.63
2.38
2.06
1 0.5 0
Afr. Am.
attended
Caucasian
non-attend
SL course
Hispanic non-SL course
Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55%
3 2.5 2
2.84 2.55
2.69
2.48
2.58
2.45 2.51
2.2
2.18 2.1 2.14
1.5
1.96
1 0.5 0
Light
attended
Moderate
non-attend
SL course
Heavy non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level
55%
3 2.5 2
2.96 2.34
2.58 2.61
2.62 2.56 2.58 2.28 1.88
1.5
2.06 1.97 1.98
1 0.5 0
Light
attended
Moderate
non-attend
SL course
Heavy non-SL course
Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Number of Sessions Attended by Ethnicity 55%
100 80 60
86 73 65
79 73 65
77 70 6365 49
4546
86
82 70 64 64 48
45
40 20 0 Af. Amer. none
Caucasian 1 to 2
Hispanic
3 to 5
6 to 10
All > 10
Supplemental Learning Findings Fall, 2006 Percentage of All Students with Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Number of Sessions Attended by Mandate Level 55%
100 80 60
838680 68
91 8480 75 58
50
81 67 62 58 53
40
72 60 52 47 38
20 0 No - Prep none
Light 1 to 2
Moderate 3 to 5
6 to 10
Heavy > 10
Supplemental Learning Campus Reports by Developmental Mathematics Course
Supplemental Learning – East Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
72
69
64
56 46
53
48
58 61
68
65
48
48
57 55
38
MAT0012 attended
MAT0024 non-attend
MAT1033 SL course
Total Campus
2.43
non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 45% of MAT0012, 44% of MAT0024, and 38% of MAT1033 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. East Campus total percent participation in SL is 42% of 527 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.
Supplemental Learning – Osceola Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%
100 80
90
89
74
67 65
58 62
60
65 64
48
43
40 20
17
0 MAT0024 attended
MAT1033 non-attend
SL course
Total Campus
2.43
non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 72% of MAT0024, and 58% of MAT1033 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Osceola Campus total percent participation in SL is 62% of 169 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.
Supplemental Learning – West Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%
60 50
56 48
51 51
56
56 47
50
48 50 40
40
45
30 20 10 0 MAT0012 attended
MAT0024 non-attend
SL course
Total Campus
2.43
non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 36% of MAT0012, and 30% of MAT0024 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. West Campus total percent participation in SL is 32% of 280 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.
Supplemental Learning – Winter Park Fall, 2006 Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course 55%
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
68
62 41
48
53
MAT0012 attended
66 51
57 46
MAT0024 non-attend
54 51 48
SL course
Total Campus
2.43
non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students) Note: 33% of MAT0012, and 37% of MAT0024 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session. Winter Park Campus total percent participation in SL is 36% of 140 students enrolled in SL Developmental Mathematics.
Learning in Community (LinC) Findings - Fall, 2006
FTIC Degree-seeking Population Enrolled in LinC – Fall, 2006
Non-LinC
LinC N = 150 FTIC Other 11%
N = 2270 FTIC
Caucasian 24%
Other 13% Caucasian 37% Afr. Am. 21%
Afr. Am. 34%
Hispanic 31%
Hispanic 29%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
FTIC degree-seeking Population Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
Non-LinC
LinC
N = 2770 FTIC’s
N = 150 FTIC’s MAT1033 22% MAT0012 35%
MAT0024 43%
MAT1033 28%
MAT0012 34%
MAT0024 38%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for FTIC Students Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses LinC vs. Non-LinC Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas 18
Other (n=17) Afr. Am. (n=51)
10
Hispanic (n=47)
18 19 15
14
0%
9
Hispanic (n=790)
32 40%
31
37 28
38 20% light
40% moderate
100%
22
33
20
no prep
80%
30
21
0%
20
60%
29
14
Caucausian (n=1032)
47
34
19
Afr. Am. (n=579)
53 21
20%
Other (n=369)
35
18
17
Caucausian (n=35)
29
27 23
60% heavy
19 80%
100%
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Ethnicity 55%
100 80 60
87 70
78 69
73
82
75
71
40 20 0
Afr. Am.
Caucasian SLS only
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Hispanic SLS LinC
2.43
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Ethnicity 55%
100 80 60
88 70
86 71
72
85
79
72
40 20 0
Afr. Am.
Caucasian SLS only
Hispanic SLS LinC
2.43
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Mandate Level 100 80 60
55%
70 % 86 75
81 72
67
82
76
71
40 20 0
Light
Moderate SLS only
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Heavy SLS LinC
2.43
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 100 80
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Mandate Level 55% 70 % 91 79
60
74
85
83
77
72
65
40 20 0
Light
Moderate SLS only
Heavy SLS LinC
2.43
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Student Success by Ethnicity 3.2 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4
55%
70 % 3.16 3.07
3.02
3.00 2.89
2.66
2.89
2.70
Afr. Am.
Caucasian SLS only
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Hispanic SLS LinC
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Student Success by Ethnicity 3.2 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4
55%
70 % 3.12
3.10
3.04
2.97 2.82
2.85 2.77
2.65
Afr. Am.
Caucasian SLS only
Hispanic SLS LinC
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Student Success by Mandate Level 3.2 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4
55%
70 % 3.12 3.05 3.02
3.00 2.85
2.89
2.80 2.66
Light
Moderate SLS only
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Heavy SLS LinC
2.43
All
LinC Findings - Student Success Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Student Success by Mandate Level 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3
55%
70 % 3.10
3.08
3.04
2.97
2.90
2.87
2.85
2.59
Light
Moderate SLS only
Heavy SLS LinC
2.43
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
55%
70 % 70 49
Afr. Am.
73
69 57
57
Caucasian Dev. Math
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
71
Hispanic
55
2.43
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 55% 70 % 71 61
59
58
66
65 57
50
Afr. Am.
Caucasian Dev. Math
Hispanic
2.43
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
55%
70 % 75
74 59
Light
53
Moderate Dev. Math
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
68 56
55
46
Heavy
2.43
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 55% 70 % 75
71
63
65
54
57
53 44
Light
Moderate Dev. Math
Heavy
2.43
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 3 2.5 2 1.5
55%
70 %
2.07 2.08
2.43
2.69
2.53
2.39
2.34
2.46
1 0.5 0
Afr. Am.
Caucasian Dev. Math
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Hispanic
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity 3 2.5 2 1.5
55%
70 % 2.74
2.50 2.57
2.41
2.10 2.02
2.48
2.44
1 0.5 0
Afr. Am.
Caucasian Dev. Math
Hispanic
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 3 2.5 2
55%
70 % 2.85 2.51 2.61
2.34 2.46
2.26 1.99 2.07
1.5 1 0.5 0
Light
Moderate Dev. Math
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Heavy
2.43
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Findings – Dev. Math Fall, 2006 Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level 3 2.5 2
55%
70 % 2.60 2.57
2.79 2.39 2.44
2.33 1.97 2.10
1.5 1 0.5 0
Light
Moderate Dev. Math
Heavy
2.43
Dev. Math LinC
All
LinC Campus Reports by Developmental Mathematics and Student Success Courses
East LinC – Developmental Math Fall 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics 55%
70 %
100
86 76
80 60
68
65 49
55
55
49
40 20 0 MAT0012
MAT0024 non-LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
MAT1033
2.43
LinC
All Dev. Math
Osceola LinC–Developmental Math Fall 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
55%
70 % 77 62
66 55
MAT0024
SLS1122
2.43
non-LinC (Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC
West LinC – Developmental Math Fall 2006 Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
55%
70 %
76
68
61
68
61
51
51 42
MAT0012
MAT0024 non-LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
MAT1033
2.43
LinC
All Dev. Math
Student Success Findings Comparison Fall 2004 to Fall 2006 Cohort
FTIC Population Enrolled in Student Success – Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 Fall 2006
Fall 2004
N = 5834
N = 5027
SLS 27%
Non-SLS 73%
SLS 32%
Non-SLS 68%
“3-prep” FTIC Population Enrolled in Student Success – Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 Fall 2004
Fall 2006
N = 1105
N = 1196
SLS 37%
SLS 67%
Non-SLS 63%
Non-SLS 33%
SLS – Fall to Spring Retention Rates by All FTIC Students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 83%
84% 82%
55%
81%
80%
78%
78%
76%
76% 74% 72% SLS % Fall 2004 ret Spring 2005
Non-SLS % Fall 2006 ret Spring 2007
SLS – Fall GPA by All FTIC students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 55%
2.6
2.56
2.55 2.5 2.43
2.45 2.4
2.45
2.39
2.35 2.3 SLS
Non-SLS Fall 2004
Fall 2006
SLS – Fall to Spring Retention Rates by “3-prep” mandate students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
55%
77%
80% 65%
SLS % Fall 2004 ret Spring 2005
69%
Non-SLS % Fall 2006 ret Spring 2007
SLS – Fall GPA by “3-prep” Mandate Students Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts 2.35 2.3 2.25 2.2 2.15 2.1 2.05 2 1.95 1.9
2.32 2.19 2.06
2.05
SLS
Non-SLS Fall 2004
Fall 2006