Skip to main content

The Argonaut | February 13 2025

Page 1

February 13, 2025

UIARGONAUT.COM

FOR, OF AND BY THE STUDENTS SINCE 1898

ASUI votes to praise Trump-Vance victory Senate tied 6-6, vice president breaks vote to pass resolution Rebekah Weaver ARGONAUT

At the Feb. 12 ASUI Senate meeting, ASUI voted 7-6 to pass a resolution congratulating President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance on the presidential election. The resolution was authored by a student and sponsored by Senator Izaak Krohn, who said, “It is important for us as a student government to recognize and congratulate the new leaders of our country, especially when these leaders are working

John Keegan | Argonaut

for the bettering of the country and the livelihoods of students.” Krohn claimed support for the resolution on the grounds of the Trump administration “creating seven million jobs” and Trump’s work in deregulation, specifically citing the Department of Government Efficiency. Krohn also claimed that there is “massive benefit in shutting down the federal Department of Education” by reducing government overreach and restoring educational power to local government systems. Senator Arielle Hebison proposed that this resolution was a good opportunity to show the true bipartisanship of ASUI and that the resolution would “make ASUI look more well-rounded as a whole.” “When we speak tonight, we’re speaking for the students we represent, not just ourselves,” Hebison said. However, Senator Lance Butikofer remained in strong opposition to passing the resolution. “I don’t believe this resolution is the vehicle to bipartisanship,” Butikofer said. “I believe it is the vehicle to polarization.” Butikofer argued against the clause in the resolution that claims Trump was part of a “peaceful transfer of power,” calling it a rewrite of history. “Passing this resolution would be an attempt to defy history and distort the reality of Trump’s actions,” he said. Butikofer motioned to postpone the resolution indefinitely, which would eliminate all further discussion of the resolution and remove it from the Senate agenda. This motion was dismissed 7-5. The roll call vote to pass the resolution resulted in a tie. Vice President Emma Johnston placed a tiebreaking vote, ultimately approving it. ASUI also voted to approve a resolution criticizing the Idaho Legislature’s efforts to ban gay marriage.

PSU forward Isaiah Johnson goes up for a layup over two UI players

Vision 2050 hosts final plan review Community-driven 25-year plan will improve three campus zones Julia Kolman ARGONAUT

Feb. 4 marked the culmination of nearly a full year of work on Vision 2050, the long-range campus development plan spearheaded by architecture planning firm SmithGroup. On Tuesday, the firm’s representative, Neal Kessler, laid out a final project summary and plan review before touching on the next steps to make Vision 2050 a reality. Vision 2050 centers on connectivity throughout campus, building on the current foundation to establish a vibrant, fluid college community. Spanning over the next 25 years, it will take steps to make sure our campus remains strong and thriving for generations of UI students. “It’s been really fantastic to have so many people involved,” Kessler said, regarding the project’s current standing. “[There are] so many voices that really care about the University of Idaho.” Kessler discussed hopes to establish three distinct “zones” across campus, tentatively named Legacy Crossing, Campus Core and Athletics and Events. Legacy Crossing would focus on the connection between downtown Moscow and the UI campus by expanding the Hello Walk through campus. The zone would center around what is now Paradise Creek, creating a walkable seam between the two. This district would establish mixed-use developments and include a medical education district, expanding on the Huckabay WWAMI building. The Campus Core district is, true to its name, the central part of campus. These renovations would focus on prioritizing pedestrians, shutting down sixth Street to vehicle use, and focusing on campus walkability. News, 1

Life, 4

Sports, 6

Opinion, 10

Gallery, 14

Finally, Athletics and Events would encapsulate the area surrounding the Kibbie Dome, refining the athletic sector. From here, the project is now looking at the next steps to bring all of these ideas to fruition. Throughout the next few months, documents will be finalized, cementing Vision 2050. When asked for a statement regarding what this all means for current university students, Kessler said, “[It’s a] super exciting time for them. They’ve had a real voice in this process, really big voice in what the future of their campus holds.” He emphasized that while these renovations won’t be utilized by current students, they’ll be present when they send their kids here.

State wants to enact DEI laws Idaho Legislature proposes bill to remove university DEI requirements Paige Wilton ARGONAUT

Idaho lawmakers are looking to double down on the Idaho State Board of Education’s recent decision to ban diversity, equity and inclusion services in higher education with a new bill. This legislation would prohibit DEI courses from being required for any degree, unless they are for a degree path that is primarily focused on racial, ethnic or gender studies. It would not ban DEI discussions altogether, though it would put restrictions on the topics. The one to suggest this was Republican Senator Ben Toews of Coeur d’Alene. He presented the draft on Jan. 9 and has since received mixed reactions towards it. In his Statement of Purpose, Toews describes what he wants the bill to affect. “It prohibits DEI-based discrimination in admission and hiring, DEI-related employee incentives, DEI offices and officer positions, diversity training and bias reporting systems. Students also may not be forced to enroll in a course designed and implemented with DEI principles unless their chosen course of study is based on these concepts.” Toews did not respond to The Argonaut for comment, but his ideas and opinions can be seen in the meeting videos posted by the Idaho Legislature. Opposing the idea is lone Democrat Melissa Wintrow, the state Senate Minority Leader and the only one to vote no on the proposition. Though Wintrow has many fears about this bill coming to fruition, her most pressing issue is the First Amendment breach it would cause. “[Toews] is saying you can’t require people to learn certain things but you can require them to learn others, and that’s a First Amendment violation,” Wintrow said to The Argonaut. “The government has picked concepts, ideas and theories that they say you may not do training on. And that’s a violation.” While the bill has not been passed yet, Wintrow is confident that it will. In the Jan. 9 Idaho Legislature meeting, Toews reaffirms that free speech on the topics will still be allowed as well as conversations, but required courses on that content will not. He claims it will not be an infringement on rights. “It’s important that we are not restricting any form of speech in this legislation. The goal is to make sure that all speech is allowed. That’s based on state and federal law,” Toews said. Toews is cited having shared a story about the experience of a conservative student in his daughter’s university class. The student spoke of feeling uncomfortable and unwelcome in a course because of her own political beliefs. Wintrow was disappointed by both the story and its use in context. She expressed how, as Senate Minority Leader, she feels uncomfortable in legislation daily. “College education—any education—is about cognitive dissonance. It’s about discomfort, so we can learn.”

Reagan Jones | Argonaut

See page 3 for full story on new ASUI monument University of Idaho

Volume 126, Issue no. 7

Recyclable


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
The Argonaut | February 13 2025 by The Argonaut - Issuu