THE SPIRIT OF ALL NATIONS WEDNESDAY May 10th, 2023 | www.tworowtimes.com | 519-900-5535 | Grand River Territory | FREE
1045 Brant County Hwy 54 Ohsweken 519-770-3628
Band Council lawyer: HDI is obstructive, divisive and not transparent with community about finances DONNA DURIC
donna@tworowtimes.com
TWO ROW TIMES
Hear Right hearrightcanada.ca
Under Treaty Rights First Nations people are entitled to receive Hearing Aids at no cost. Come see us for details. STATE OF THE ART PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT COMPLIMENTARY HEARING TESTS CERTIFIED PROFESSIONALS LIFETIME FREE ADJUSTMENTS & CLEANING HEARING AIDS KEEP THE MIND EXERCISED AND SHARP! DON’T LET HEARING PROBLEMS STOP YOU FROM BEING PART OF THE FAMILY! WE ARE PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE OUR TEAM IN CALEDONIA Kelly Gadoury Hearing Instrument Specialist
Tara Harview Hearing Consultant
322 Argyle St South, Caledonia 289-757-7777 6 Parkview Rd, Hagersville (Located Inside Morison Insurance) 1-844-233-4317
Come see us for great savings
SALES • SERVICE • PARTS
SNOWMOBILES • SIDE X SIDES • ATVS • MOTORCYCLES • JET SKIS • LAWN MOWERS
1264 COLBORNE ST. EAST, BRANTFORD, ONTARIO PHONE
519.759.8140
A lawyer representing Six Nations of the Grand River Elected Council said allowing the Haudenosaunee Development Institute to intervene in Six Nations’ multi-billion-dollar lawsuit against the feds would be inappropriate. “That should not be allowed,” said Iris Antonios, a lawyer representing SNGREC. “HDI is a divisive, obstructive, opaque association and it would be inappropriate for it to be chosen or appointed by this court as a representative.” The comments came at the first day of hearings at Superior Court in Toronto where three different parties are expected to argue why they should also be included in SNGREC’s massive land claim suit seeking an accounting of funds from the federal government for hundreds of thousands of hectares of land within the Haldimand Tract. The tract covers six miles on either side of the Grand River from its mouth to its source. Six Nations says 95 per cent of that land was unlawfully squandered by federal agents and today, only five per cent of that land base remains, at the Six Nations reserve. Antonios told the court that HDI is made up of two individuals: Aaron Detlor, a Toronto lawyer, and Brian Doolittle. She said Detlor has been paid doubly by both the HDI and the HDIs numbered corporation
hundreds of thousands of dollars in success fees in addition to his regular salary and legal bills. She presented exhibits showing that success fees have been paid to Detlor every year since 2017 but this was not public knowledge until he was cross-examined by a court. “That only came to light on cross examination. It is an opaque organization.” Detlor's actions at the Metrolinx site at Moss Park also came under the microscope. In January 2023, after talks with Metrolinx broke down with HDI, Detlor smashed a car into a construction fence, causing employees and an archaeologist on site to feel threatened, to which he later apologized. She said he claimed he was asserting his treaty rights to obstruct tree cutting work at the park. The HDI applied to be an intervenor in the historic land claim battle last year, claiming it is the rightful governing body of Six Nations and that elected council was not in power at the time the Haldimand Proclamation was made in 1784. The HDI further stated that the Haldimand Proclamation is not the basis of its land rights arguments, saying that the government at the time had no right to give away land that it didn’t own anyway. The elected council only came into power in 1924, Antonios said, but stated many Six Nations community members did not want a hereditary government in place and wanted an elected system. It’s been said by some
historians that the RCMP forcibly removed the traditional council and replaced it with the elected band council in 1924. Antonios said that the elected council of 1924 is not the same as the one functioning today, with a custom election code outside the authority of the Indian Act. Antonios said the HDI intervention is an attempted governance claim and that they are attempting to usurp the band council and bring the litigation back solely under the jurisdiction of the HCCC. Six Nations Elected Council had tried to resolve its outstanding land claim issues in the 80s under the federal government’s specific claims process but that process did not lead to a resolution, leading them to file the court case in 1995. The case was put in abeyance in 2006 to enter into joint negotiations with the HCCC, seeking a joint resolution, after Six Nations people staged a massive land rights protest in Caledonia by stopping construction on a proposed subdivision on contested land. She said the HCCC considered intervening in the case in 2009 when it says band council walked away from the joint negotiations but did not file the intervention until 2022. The HCCC informed sister Haudenosaunee communities in Canada and the United States of its intent to intervene last year, but only after they already filed the motion to intervene. They were not consulted prior to the motion being filed, said Antonios.
Particularly, she noted a letter from the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte objected to the HDI representing the Haudenosaunee people in court. Antonios laid out her case by stating the HDI had received about $38 million in revenue over the past roughly 10 years but much of the information about the HDI’s funds hasn’t been public, calling it an “opaque” organization. She concluded her arguments by saying allowing the HDI to intervene in the case would be “inappropriate.” On Monday, the trial was originally set to start but was delayed after legal counsel for HDI requested a last minute case conference to see if the issues at hand could be resolved. Those negotiations were ultimately unsuccessful and the matter proceeded to court anyway. A Six Nations rep told 2RT the HDI had made an “unacceptable” proposal that failed negotiation attempts and that all sides were going back to court for the hearings. A lawyer for the Men’s Fire told 2RT the case built up by the HDI is “exceedingly weak” and the last minute attempt to settle things outside the hearings process was likely a response to the writing on the wall. A Six Nations rep echoed the same, saying HDI was not confident they would get what they were asking for from the courts. At Tuesdays hearings HDI appeared to be walking back their original claim — including the statement that they represent the
whole Haudenosaunee population and instead said they would only represent the HCCC. The Men’s Fire of Six Nations and the Elected Council are both arguing that HDI lacks accountability and should not be a party to the land claim. Ontario responded to HDIs motion and says that it should be dismissed because HDI and HCCC do not have legal standing as they are not a natural person or a corporation. They say that HDI told the court that regardless of the outcome that the HCCC Chiefs and Clanmothers will not abide by any order of the court, and as such there should be orders given if HDI is successfully added to the case - specifically an order that legally binds the HCCC Chiefs and Clanmothers to abide forever by the determination of the court. HDI said they would be willing to change the intervenor motion to name Brian Doolittle and Aaron Detlor personally to be included in the land claims case. HDI lawyers also said that the HCCC chiefs and clanmothers told them they would all be willing to follow the orders of the courts but would reserve the right to respond to any decision they don’t like by addressing potential negative outcomes as any other sovereign nation would, potentially bringing it to “the Hague”. The hearings will reconvene Wednesday morning at 9:30 a.m. in Toronto. PM42686517