Frary’s Meatless Mondays enforce restrictive eating habits

MADISON LEWIS

CW: Eating Disorders

“MEATLESS MONDAY. DO NOT GO TO FRARY!” flashes on the women’s water polo team group text. After a four-hour double-practice plus a lift, the low-protein, hot, vegetarian options just won’t cut it. Let’s face it: no one wants a bowl of salad bar tofu.

This story might sound extreme, but I’m not being dramatic. I tell this story to demonstrate that these forced, dining hall choices don’t work for everyone.

Sure, reducing some meat consumption due to environmental concerns is a laudable goal. But completely eliminating meat for a meal encourages — and even enforces — restrictive eating habits. There has to be better ways to reduce meat consumption, while encouraging healthy relationships with food.

Yes, it’s certainly possible to find nutritional sustenance and joy while eating within the confines of vegetarian or vegan diets. Many students voluntarily choose vegetarian or vegan lifestyles, whether for environmental concerns or moral reasons completely unrelated to dietary restriction, and can pursue that choice in a healthy way.

But we can’t ignore that veg - an or vegetarian diets can and have been used to disguise, incentivize and perpetuate restrictive eating.

Any form of restriction can lend itself to disordered eating. No matter how you spin it, Frary’s elimination of the largest source of protein, one of the 5 major food groups, is forced restriction.

These dining hall endorsed food restrictions are especially concerning for college students, a group that is highly susceptible to developing eating disorders. College is a pivotal developmental period in many students’ lives during which dieting can transition to more serious disordered eating.

The Collegiate Survey Project reported that serious eating disorders typically develop between 18 and 21 years of age. Even more devastating 10 to 20 percent of women and four to 10 percent of men suffer from an eating disorder while in college. For many students, they are learning to navigate eating independently for the first time in their adult lives.

Dining halls should provide choice rather than incentivizing restriction.

But if you still aren’t convinced by the self-reporting surveys, medical research from the National Library of Medicine found that eating disorders and vegetarianism can have a correlational relationship. While there is still room for more research into that causal chain, the study noted that healthcare professionals should view vegetarian diets as serious “red flags” for patients with preexisting or suspected eating disorders.

Why? Because people may justify restrictive eating habits under the guise of vegetarianism, using it as a socially acceptable way to frame their disordered eating. The 5C administration needs to consider how encouraging vegetarianism through diet elimination can have these negative consequences, unintended or not. Facilitating choice and reducing overall meat consumption are not mutually exclusive goals, and should never be framed as such.

Instead of meatless days, the dining halls should take a more holistic and flexible approach to reducing overall meat consumption and more effectively tending to the environment. Schools can think critically about reducing red meat consumption or sourcing ingredients more sustainably. They can provide more vegetarian protein alternatives and decrease some quantity of meat in menu options while still giving students a choice at every meal.

If the goal is to reduce overall environmental impact, more choice, rather than none, will yield better outcomes. Fundamentally, colleges should trust students to make the choices that are best for them.

Just as they choose what classes to take and which extracurriculars to join, students should choose to eat how they want. Similarly, if the 5Cs have little control over our courses and after school activities, how is eliminating food and pushing certain diets over others not an institutional overstep? Colleges should not be assigning moral value to foods and need to recognize potential consequences when they do. Madison Lewis PO ’24 is from Palo Alto, California. She is a junior on the Pomona-Pitzer Women’s Water Polo team.

Sort of fail in a viral video

48. Less vibrant

50. They’ve been written to a nightingale and a Grecian urn

51. ___ a ___ (intense confrontation)

52. Synchronize 54. Enjoying, as a TV show

55. What you might tell a smart speaker — or a kind of motion that happens four times in this puzzle?

60. More obsessed with Roblox, maybe

62. Un-Cold-War-ification

16.

63. Run through some water again

64. Doc. who helps with head and neck conditions

65. La Brea substance

66. Che Guevara’s first name

67. Absolute mess

68. Powered down DOWN

1. World Cup org.

2. With Spring, series of pro-democracy protests

3. ___ Wearhouse (suit chain)

4. Efficacious

5. Band generating feedback?

6. Kind of cracker or shooter

7. Like some class presentations

8. “Holy ___!”

9. Class that helps build fluency, briefly

10. 2001 film that takes place at Harvard

11. Search engine that plants trees

12. Pre-concert string activity

13. Strip and skirt, for two

18. Dessert with lucky numbers

21. Google Maps stats

25. Onesies, e.g.

26. Source of syrup

27. Before now

29. ___ mosso (more quickly, in music)

30. One simulated a prison at Stanford

33. Make a move

35. ___ tai (cocktail)

37. “I won’t talk” agreement, briefly

39. Its longest entry, “set,” has a 60,000-word def.

40. Peace sign’s shape

41. Nation’s borders?

43. Airline with flights to Tel Aviv

45. Political refugee, for one

46. Cheese eaten with palak or mattar

47. Summer title at a company

49. Gets away from

53. L.A. museum you can enter via hovertrain (with The)

55. Uniform for some cookie vendors

56. Sandwich cookie that may or may not be vegan

57. “___ The Next One” (Jay-Z single)

58. “Uhhh!?!?!?!” over text

59. Its blasters can fire as fast as 68 mph, for some reason

61. Connections

LAST WEEK’S ANSWERS