VOLUME 4


The mainstream media was once viewed as a trusted source of information where millions of Americans could be educated on events ranging from domestic to international affairs, in fact, CNN still claims to be “the most trusted name in news”. Unfortunately, we now live in an era of lies, corruption and deception. The mainstream media has become a tool of the left to push radical propaganda for the Democrat establishment; this is what helped lead to the creation of what has now become The Raging Patriot!
Our story begins back in January of 2020, where Co-Founders Nicholas and Michael started with an idea that was aimed at allowing them to reach their base without the fear of censorship. Prior to this idea, both Nicholas and Michael had amassed hundreds of thousands of followers on social media, where they both proudly spread the TRUTH to millions of patriots. However, as previously stated, they both suffered the same consequences of Big Tech censorship resulting in limited reach and banned pages. Rather than being discouraged by this Un-American form of censorship, it only further ignited their passion to spread the TRUTH.
Fast forward to the beginning of January 2020 and President Trump had just undergone the first Impeachment hoax. After witnessing the united front of lies from the fake media, Michael and Nicholas were determined to do something to address this lost conservative voice in the media. Many ideas and early concepts were discussed and created, and eventually, The Raging Patriot became the news site you see today. Although, this was not without its challenges.
Looking back to the early days of The Raging Patriot, our organization is grateful to have been in a position to hire a talented team during the height of the Covid outbreak when 20 million Americans were out of work.
One thing that both Nicholas and Michael are extremely blessed to have is the team that makes up The Raging Patriot, without them, none of our accomplishments would have been possible. We have come a long way since our founding and we reached millions of patriots in the process, however our job is not completed yet. We set out on a mission to put ‘TRUTH’ back into news and give confidence back in the press, and we plan on continuing to pursue this mission until it is accomplished.
The short answer? “No, he’s not.” The Uncle Joe persona that the media have been selling for years is simply inaccurate. He’s a career politician who has lived off the taxpayers for 50+ years.
The only way to make it that long in Washington is to cheat, steal, and lie your way through and those are the only skills the man seems to possess. He has repeatedly lied about his college record. When Biden took his first crack at the Democratic presidential nomination in 1987, he told the crowd at a rally, “I went to law school on a full academic scholarship…[and] ended up in the top half of my class.”
Biden has also claimed that he “graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school” and was the “outstanding student in the political science department.”
These are all falsehoods. He graduated at the bottom
of his law school class, 76th out of 85 students. He did not go on a full academic scholarship but received a partial scholarship.
Don’t be shocked, but he did not win top honors in his undergrad discipline either.
Uncle Joe went on to plagiarize parts of a Neil Kinnock speech. He copied the British Labor leader’s life history saying that he was the first “in a thousand generations” to graduate from college.
He claimed that his ancestors worked in the coal mines. Again, Kinnock’s family history, not Biden’s. The 46th president is no stranger to plagiarizing. While attending law school at Syracuse University, he copied five pages from a published law review article without citing the source.
Joe put on the charm, begged for forgiveness, and escaped expulsion from law school.
Americans had higher standards for presidential
nominees so he didn’t receive a pass when the story came to light ahead of the 1988 presidential election. His campaign collapsed.
Thanks to Barack Obama, dishonest Joe’s political ambitions for higher office were revived when he chose him to be his running mate in 2008. Biden seemed harmless at the time and people laughed him off as a dimwit.
A Newsweek reporter once said, “Reporters and political consultants long ago concluded that Biden’s chief character flaw was his tendency to wing it. He seems to lack a crucial synapse between brain and tongue, the one that makes the do-I-really-want-tosay-this decision.”
Aside from his frequent gaffs and snaps at voters and reporters, Biden is an awful person with zero morals.
He repeated a lie about the man who hit his wife’s car, killing her and their daughter, Naomi in 1972. Biden made claims on several occasions that Curtis “drank his lunch” and caused the accident.
The investigation showed no evidence to back Biden’s claim and Curtis was cleared of any wrongdoing.
The investigation found that Mrs. Biden ran the stop sign and Curtis flipped his truck trying to avoid hitting her car.
Biden’s other two children, Beau and Hunter, survived the crash but were hospitalized.
Some political analysts point to that event as one of the traumas that may have contributed to the Hunter Biden we know today.
He’s been plagued with addiction and other criminal activity in the past. And though the women on The View point to Biden’s love for his son in the current scandal surrounding the first son and the president, others look at the senior Biden as an uncaring viper.
Who uses their drug-addicted son in foreign business dealings, especially when selling out the country to enrich the family?
The media give Biden a pass. Consequently, most Americans have no idea that the Bidens have been paid millions of dollars in bribes from other countries like Ukraine and Communist China.
The mainstream media have also ignored his racist views. He called Obama “the first mainstream AfricanAmerican who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”
During the 2020 presidential campaign, he said, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, you ain’t black,” as if black Americans vote as one block.
Then there is his belief that people of color cannot afford or find lawyers and accountants.
In a speech, the president said, “Young black entrepreneurs are just as capable of succeeding given the chance as white entrepreneurs are, but they don’t have lawyers, they don’t have accountants.”
They don’t? Why not Joe? Can they not figure out how to hire lawyers and accountants, just like they can’t manage to get IDs or get on the Internet?
The man who was supposed to “bring decency back to the White House” doesn’t acknowledge one of his grandchildren.
Hunter Biden has an out-of-wedlock child who is not allowed to use the Biden name or act as part of the family.
Even the very biased New York Times called out the president for his callousness toward Navy Joan. The publication printed an article entitled, “It’s Seven Grandkids, Mr. President.”
This man is not who his supporters think he is. Just ask Tara Reade or some of his staffers. He is a tyrant
with a shady past. He’s someone who uses his Department of Justice to intimidate and lock up his political opponents.
He says whatever he needs to say to get votes, even when he knows his promises are unconstitutional.
He has fooled voters for decades, but it is time to realize who this man is and send him packing in 2024.
Linda Spina is a graduate of Syracuse University where she majored in Political Science. She went on to earn a Masters in Education and worked as a teacher, but her greatest role is that of wife, and mother to two amazing daughters. Her dad, who worked in the national defense sector, instilled in her a love for country that remains to this day.
In June 2023, Joe Biden managed to wipe out at the Air Force Academy Graduation Ceremony and was unable to get up by himself.
Biden stumbled multiple times while attempting to board Air Force One.
BLUEMETHAL
SWALLWELL
BOOKER
MARKEY
HIRONA
KAINE
MCCONNELL
SCHUMER
PELOSI
ROMNEY
WARREN
OBAMA
FEINSTEIN
SANDERS
HARRIS
HUNTER
BIDEN
OMAR
AOC
On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against using race-conscious admission programs at institutes of higher learning across the nation.
The ruling said that admission policies at Harvard University discriminated against applicants of Asian descent and at the University of North Carolina against white and Asian American applicants.
ideological lines” calling the six justices who voted to reverse the practice of considering race as a factor in college admissions a “conservative supermajority.”
Are judges supposed to be conservative or liberal? Aren’t they supposed to view cases on their constitutionality? The ideology of a judge should not play a role in a case brought before the court.
LARRY ELDER - APRIL 6, 2023
The court ruled that these policies violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause under the Fourteenth Amendment.
NPR referred to the decision as being “divided along
It is on brand for Leftists to disparage any Republicanappointed judge and to automatically disavow any ruling they view as having a conservative majority.
Do an internet search. You’ll find articles touting all of the negative effects of reversing affirmative action.
“The Supreme Court ruling to end affirmative action will make US doctors less diverse” is one example. How can a publication make such an argument?
Is that to say that people of color can’t get into college or medical school without having a leg up?
The article claims that “multiple studies have shown that patients prefer their doctor to be the same race or ethnicity as them.”
I don’t know about you, but I have a very diverse group of healthcare professionals. I tend to go with the doctor, dentist, chiropractor, etc. who has been recommended and is good at the job. I don’t care what ethnicity or color they are. It’s just another example of the racism on display by the Leftists in this country.
One of the most racist statements made after the announcement of the ruling came from someone who thinks that black Americans can’t compete for a spot in a college or university without special treatment. She tweeted, “No black person will be able to succeed in a merit-based system.” She viewed this statement as supportive of the black community.
People like this cannot see how racist they come off when saying that people of color need special treatment. This is the belief that they can’t make it on merit.
One response to her tweet sums it up. It reads, "When you have to clarify your tweets cuz it sounded SO RACIST, You just doubled down on your racism."
"We minorities DID NOT want AFFIRMATIVE ACTION expressly for the reason you mentionedthat YOU think we NEED it. No, we don't need the INSULT!"
The bigotry of low expectations has no place in this country. We need to get back to the meritocratic America of yesteryear.
Advancing people based on race, gender, or any other immutable characteristic is wrong in most instances and downright dangerous in others.
Do you want to fly on a plane piloted by a diversity hire rather than the person most qualified? How about your doctor, surgeon, or car mechanic? Most qualified or someone who doesn't meet the standards but is admitted because of race or gender?
America cannot compete in the world without advancing the most qualified people. And those who think the most qualified person cannot possibly be someone of color are the actual racists.
The media and others like Michelle and Barack Obama had a meltdown over the decision to take race out of the equation when admitting students to schools. Still, the number of people who support the ruling far outnumbers those who oppose it.
According to The Jewish Press, "84% of white people oppose basing college admissions on race, but so do 81% of Hispanics, 76% of Asians, and 71% of black people."
Every American should have an equal opportunity to achieve the American dream. Asian Americans were pushed aside when applying to Harvard prompting the lawsuit against the university.
"An Asian-American applicant with a 25% chance of
admission, for example, would have a 35% chance if he were white, 75% if he were Hispanic, and 95% chance if he were African-American," according to the lawsuit.
How does more discrimination help erase past discrimination? Justice Clarence Thomas made this point in his opinion. He wrote in part, "This vision of meeting social racism with government-imposed racism is thus self-defeating, resulting in a neverending cycle of victimization."
Linda Spina is a graduate of Syracuse University where she majored in Political Science. She went on to earn a Masters in Education and worked as a teacher, but her greatest role is that of wife, and mother to two amazing daughters. Her dad, who worked in the national defense sector, instilled in her a love for country that remains to this day.
In December 2019, former President Donald Trump officially announced the establishment of the United States Space Force, a new branch of the U.S. military. The Space Force was created with the aim of addressing the increasing importance of space-related operations and national security concerns. Trump described space as a critical domain for defense, communication, and technological advancement. The unveiling ceremony emphasized the need for American dominance in space and highlighted the potential threats posed by other nations in this arena
President Donald Trump's ambitious proposal to construct a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. This initiative was a central theme of his 2016 presidential campaign and aimed to address concerns regarding illegal immigration and national security.
Disclaimer:
If you’re thin and fit, you might be a white supremacist.
If you work out, you might be a white supremacist.
If you support former President Trump, you might be a white supremacist.
If you’re Asian and fight against discrimination in college admissions, you might be a white supremacist.
If you’re a black Republican, you might be a white supremacist.
If you’re a Hispanic mass murderer, you might be a white supremacist.
If you release a song called Try That in a Small Town, you might be a white supremacist.
Believe it or not, these are all examples of Leftists twisting themselves up to call anyone who goes against their agenda a white supremacist.
Just ask author and weight culture journalist Virginia
Sole-Smith. She appeared on NPR’s “Fresh Air” podcast and connected being thin to white supremacy. She called it a “white ideal” and said, “Obviously, white supremacy is trying to maintain the power structure. So celebrating a thin white body as the ideal body is a way to ‘other’ and demonize black and brown bodies, bigger bodies, and anyone who doesn’t fit into that norm.
“So this is really about maintaining systems of white supremacy and patriarchy,” she said.
“If you can understand that, actually, by continuing to pursue thinness you are in some level, maintaining your complicity with white supremacy and patriarchy,” Sole-Smith added.
MSNBC published an article entitled, Pandemic fitness trends have gone extreme — literally, White supremacists’ latest scheme to valorize violence and hypermasculinity has gone digital.
In the article, the author says that “physical fitness has always been central to the far right.” The MSNBC columnist goes on to outline how Hitler “fixated on boxing and jujitsu” to help create an army with fit, trained bodies to help the German nation. So any activity performed by Hitler is off limits if you wish to separate yourself from white supremacy. Got it?
its admission policies that favor other minorities.
When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the Asian American students’ favor, an Asian-American mother and immigrant who was involved with groups fighting for an end to affirmative action policies that discriminated against Asians was attacked for a tweet that celebrated the high court’s ruling.
Yiatin Chu wrote, “I told my daughter that today is a big day. They’ve ended affirmative action. ‘Isn’t it what you’ve been fighting for?’ she asked. I said yes.”
Jemele Hill, a writer for The Atlantic, shot back at the woman. “Can’t wait until she reads that you gladly carried the water for white supremacy and stabbed the folks in the back whose people fought diligently for Asian American rights in America,” she tweeted. Chu responded to this ridiculous statement by saying that the ruling was a result of a case brought by Asian Americans but “it’s really a ruling for all kids to not be judged by their race.”
The party that is supposed to be against judging people by the color of their skin wants college applicants to be judged by the color of their skin for college admissions.
And, don’t you dare support Donald Trump for president. If you are an American who supports a secure border and law and order policies, desire lower taxes, and support America first policies, the far left views you as a white supremacist.
You can be black, white, Asian, or Hispanic, but if you’re a Republican and a Trump supporter, you are the face of white supremacy.
Asian American students, rejected by Harvard University, brought a lawsuit against the school over
Let’s look at the media’s treatment of another racial group. The Dallas Morning News published an article entitled, Machismo, misogyny, misinformation: Why some Hispanic people become white supremacists. The article discusses the Latino gunman who killed eight people in a Dallas outlet mall. The author surmises that his extremist views made him a white supremacist. then there are the well-known black conservatives like Larry Elder, Clarence Thomas, Candace Owens, and Byron Donalds. Leftists call them names such as Uncle Tom, the blackface of white supremacy, coon, and porch monkey.
It's acceptable for "anti-racists" to use racial slurs when referring to anyone who does not toe the party line. And they get away with it. No one gets canceled. No one gets punished.
Country singer Jason Aldean recently released a video for his song Try That in a Small Town, and the Leftists lost their minds.
The lyrics? "Cuss out a cop, spit in his face, stomp on the flag, and light it up. Yeah, you think you're tough. Well, try that in a small town."
What is it that bothers them most? Is it the real news footage of the rioting (mostly peaceful protests) that took place in 2020? Or could it be the feeling of community where neighbors have each others' backs regardless of differences?
Racism is on life support and being revived by Leftists. There is a bigger demand for racism than the supply so it has to be manufactured.
Stop looking at everything through a racist lens and
start looking at people as individuals regardless of their skin color.
Linda Spina is a graduate of Syracuse University where she majored in Political Science. She went on to earn a Masters in Education and worked as a teacher, but her greatest role is that of wife, and mother to two amazing daughters. Her dad, who worked in the national defense sector, instilled in her a love for country that remains to this day.
On July 3, 2020, former President Donald Trump delivered a speech at Mount Rushmore in South Dakota to commemorate Independence Day. In his address, he praised American history, culture, and values while emphasizing unity and national pride. Trump celebrated the accomplishments of past leaders represented on the monument and their contributions to the nation's development. He spoke about the challenges faced by the United States, both historically and in the present, and highlighted the need to preserve American heritage.
On September 11, 2017, President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump, accompanied by White House personnel, pay their respects with a moment of silence on the South Lawn of the White House. This event commemorates the 16th anniversary of the tragic September 11 terrorist attacks in Washington, which claimed the lives of nearly 3,000 individuals and left around 6,000 others injured.
BREITBART OREILLY PRAGER AILES
ELDER INGRAHAM
HANNITY
SHAPIRO
DOBBS
WALSH
LIMBAUGH
COULTER
CARLSON MALKIN
Much of the left-leaning media characterize the Supreme Court’s 303 Creative v. Elenis decision as a setback for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community.
Others with more discernment view it as a win for free speech.
On June 30, 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of web designer Lorie Smith, the owner of the Colorado-based 303 Creative.
Smith refused to make a wedding announcement website for a same-sex couple as it goes against her beliefs as a Christian.
The high court ruled that it was within Smith’s First Amendment rights to decline to make a wedding website for the couple.
Smith has LGBTQ+ clients. She treats everyone with respect but since she does not believe in same-sex marriage, she did not feel comfortable making such
a website.
Following the announcement of the ruling, Smith said, “Everyone should be free to speak consistent with who they are and what they believe.”
“And I’m grateful for the court for affirming that the government can’t force anyone to say something they don’t believe,” Smith added. “Today is truly a victory for each and every one of us.”
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion. In it, he said, “The First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing the website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees.”
You can find article after article citing the ruling as a loss for the LGBTQ+ community and their rights. What rights are they losing? The right to force someone to do something that goes against their beliefs? It’s absurd. The couple was free to find another web designer
who would be happy to make their wedding website, but just like in the cake baker case, it’s about forcing someone to do something that violates his or her religious beliefs.
Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cake in Denver, Colorado refused to make a cake for a gay wedding and continued to be harrassed by other same-sex couples and prosecuted for over a decade.
Phillips reminded people that this is not about discrimination. It’s about his beliefs. He said if someone asked him to make a cake or dessert that insulted the LGBTQ+ community, he would refuse that too. He considers his cakes works of art and does not want to be forced to “express a view” that violates his religious beliefs.
So how was this ruling a win for free speech?
In case you haven’t noticed, the anti-free speech crowd is getting dangerously close to policing speech. Has anyone tried to force you to use their “preferred
pronouns?” It’s happening!
We’re being told that we must call Lia Thomas, and others like him, a woman when he is clearly a fully formed man.
National Review writer Bryan Neihart wrote, “In 303 Creative, the Court upholds the principle, central to our democracy, that the government doesn’t get to decide which ideas people are allowed to express.”
He asked the question anyone who thinks the court ruling was wrong should ponder...”Don’t you have the right to your own speech?”
How can any American think it’s acceptable to tell people they must say something or express something they don’t believe?
Neihart reiterated the three points the Supreme Court made “crystal clear.”
Lorie Smith serves all clients but “will not create expressions that defy any of her beliefs for any customer.”
The First Amendment protects all manner of speech including her custom websites and “speech conveyed over the internet” even when it’s for profit. The precedent the Court followed dates back to the 1940s. In that case, the Court ruled that “the government has no valid interest in compelling speech.” The ruling at that time said that states could not force school students to “repeat a pledge that violated their faith.”
In this ruling, SCOTUS said that the state of Colorado could not force Smith “to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance.”
Thinking beyond the protected LGBTQ+ class, would you want the government to force you to do something that goes against your beliefs?
Neihart brings up situations such as asking a person who is pro-abortion to promote a pro-life rally or an atheist to paint a Christian cross. Government-forced speech is just plain wrong.
We have God-given rights that the government may not trample. Freedom of speech is an integral part of our democracy. Without it, America is doomed.
Linda Spina is a graduate of Syracuse University where she majored in Political Science. She went on to earn a Masters in Education and worked as a teacher, but her greatest role is that of wife, and mother to two amazing daughters. Her dad, who worked in the national defense sector, instilled in her a love for country that remains to this day.
In October 2019, former President Donald Trump announced the successful operation that killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State (ISIS). Addressing the nation, Trump described the operation as a significant victory in the fight against terrorism and highlighted the importance of safeguarding American national security. He praised the efforts of the U.S. military and intelligence community in tracking down and eliminating a notorious terrorist figure.
In his historic speech on June 12, 1987, President Ronald Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate and emphatically called for the demolition of the Berlin Wall, declaring, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" This iconic moment symbolized Reagan's unwavering dedication to freedom, becoming a catalyst in the eventual fall of the wall in 1989 and the reunification of Germany.
The Raging Patriot is a conservative news outlet that aims for truthful news to inform the general public of the United States of America.