2 minute read

Devastating Easter Floods: Brantford Spared, Paris and Galt Suffer Extensive Damage

Next Article
TRAVEL COLUMN

TRAVEL COLUMN

The Easter Sunday floods of 1912 left a lasting impression on the residents of Paris and Galt, a powerful reminder of our rivers power, while Brantford narrowly escaped the worst of the devastation The volume of floodwaters pouring through these communities reached an unprecedented level, leaving behind a trail of destruction and despair. In Brantford, the city's diligent efforts to fortify the riverbanks with sturdy dikes proved to be effective in sparing the city from a calamitous inundation However, despite their best efforts, the Birkett Lane area experienced a massive overflow that overwhelmed nearby properties. The relentless force of the floodwaters at the Cockshutt Bridge shattered a natural gas main, plunging the entire city into darkness. Residents were left without heating or lighting for several hours, adding to the hardships caused by the floods. Similar breaks in the gas supply occurred in Paris and Galt, compounding the challenges faced by these beleaguered communities. Unfortunately, Paris could not escape the wrath of the floodwaters. Families were compelled to abandon their homes as both the Grand and Nith Rivers burst their banks, causing extensive damage that surpassed even the previous record flood of 1898. The floodwaters rose to over five feet in the basements of stores on West River Street, while the Penman woolen mills were completely submerged, rendering them inoperable for several days. The local weekly paper, The StarTranscript, found its presses and type submerged in the basement, further hampering the community's ability to communicate and gather information. With no gas available for heating or lighting, the citizens of Paris faced a grim and challenging ordeal.

Advertisement

Postcard depicting the flooding at Penmans’ Mills in Paris, Ontario on Easter Sunday, April 7, 1912. The mills were shut down for several days.

Similarly, Galt also fell victim to the overflow of the Grand River, resulting in widespread damage across a vast area. Early estimates placed the cost of the destruction at over $100,000, a staggering sum for the time. Many families were forced to abandon their homes and seek shelter elsewhere. Downstream from Galt, the Grand Valley Railway on the Brantford-Paris-Galt line was submerged for miles, with several railway poles collapsing under the relentless force of the floodwaters

The

The flood dealt a severe blow to the infrastructure and economy of the affected regions

The severity of the floods was exacerbated by the bitter winter that preceded them. The winter of 1911-12 was one of the coldest in recent memory, with a fierce blizzard striking the region on the first day of spring, March 21. The city streets were buried under twofoot-deep drifts, bringing traffic to a standstill. Streetcars were unable to operate within the city or on the Brantford-Paris-Galt route At that time, the idea of the Grand River breaking free from its icy grip seemed remote and unlikely.

The aftermath of the floods prompted deep reflection, and newspapers emphasized the pressing need for increased flood prevention measures. They suggested that the rapid clearing of the countryside, which resulted in a sudden surge of water during the spring thaw, had contributed to the increased frequency and intensity of the floods. The construction of reclamation dams on the Grand River and its tributaries was proposed as a solution to mitigate future flooding. It was acknowledged that local flood prevention works alone would not suffice. However, the cost of such an undertaking was deemed prohibitive for individual municipalities, making provincial funding essential. Despite the urgency, the government appeared hesitant to address the issue, concerned about potential claims from other flood-affected regions.

Nevertheless, citizens and municipal leaders were encouraged to persistently advocate for relief until the government was compelled to take action. It was seen as unjust that municipalities like Galt, Paris, and Brantford, which bore no responsibility for the creation of these dire conditions, should suffer the consequences. The aftermath of the 1912 Easter floods served as a stark reminder of the urgent need for comprehensive flood prevention measures and the imperative for government intervention to protect vulnerable communities along the Grand River and its tributaries. The resilience and determination of the affected communities would play a crucial role in shaping future flood management policies, ensuring the safety and well-being of the region's residents.

This article is from: