Skip to main content

July 2, 2026

Page 1

Volume 56 - No. 27

July 2, 2026

Sharia and Freedom

Cannot Occupy the Same Throne by lyle e davis We apparently struck a nerve with last week’s analysis of Islam and Islamophobia. Some positive comments, some negative . . via phone, by emails, and in person. It’s apparently a sensitive issue. This week’s cover story is likely to touch a few more nerves. The debate over Sharia law is too often clouded by euphemism, intimidation, and intellectual cowardice. We are told that criticism of Sharia is

really criticism of Muslims. We are told that concerns about Islamic law are merely products of ignorance or prejudice. We are instructed to avert our eyes from uncomfortable realities lest we be accused of intolerance.

whether Sharia, understood as a comprehensive legal and political system governing society, is compatible with the principles of a free civilization.

Enough.

Not “sometimes.” Not “under certain conditions.” Not “if properly interpreted.” No.

The question before free societies is not whether Muslims deserve equal rights. They do. The question is not whether Muslims can be loyal citizens of constitutional republics. Millions are. The real question is

The Paper • 760.747.7119 online: www.TheCommunityPaper.com

email: thepaper@cox.net

The answer is no.

A society must ultimately decide what sits at the summit of its legal order. In constitutional democracies, the highest authority is the law

as established through representative institutions and constrained by constitutional limits. In a Shariabased state, the highest authority is not the citizen, not the constitution, not democratic consent, but divine law as interpreted by religious authorities. These two principles are fundamentally incompatible. The conflict is not a matter of cultural preference. It is a conflict between rival conceptions of sovereignty. Either the people govern

Sharia Law See Page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
July 2, 2026 by The Paper - Issuu