Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
CA Prajwal Jha Associate Research and Advisory, Taxmann
CA Bhawna Grover Manager Research and Advisory, Taxmann
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
CA Prajwal Jha Associate Research and Advisory, Taxmann
CA Bhawna Grover Manager Research and Advisory, Taxmann
Contents 1.
Introduction
5
2.
Investment in Subsidiary: Measurement in Separate Financial Statements on Transition to Ind AS
5
3.
Debentures of a Subsidiary: Applicability of the Paragraph D15 Exemption under Ind AS 101
6
4.
Treatment of Accumulated Losses of a Subsidiary in Non-controlling Interest
8
5.
Conclusion
10
1. Introduction The transition to Ind AS is not merely a process of restating financial statements under a new set of accounting standards. It requires first-time adopters to carefully examine existing accounting treatments, determine the applicability of transition exemptions and exceptions, and assess the requirements of the relevant Ind AS from the date of transition. The interaction between Ind AS 101, First time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards and other standards can give rise to several practical issues, particularly in relation to investments, financial instruments and consolidated financial statements. This article examines selected practical issues arising on first-time adoption of Ind AS through case studies. The cases illustrate the application of transition provisions to investments in subsidiaries, the applicability of paragraph D15 to instruments issued by subsidiaries, and the treatment of accumulated losses attributable to non-controlling interests. The objective is to demonstrate how the specific facts and circumstances of an arrangement, together with the transition options available under Ind AS 101, determine the accounting outcome.
2. Investment in Subsidiary: Measurement in Separate Financial Statements on Transition to Ind AS 2.1 Understanding the Issue On transition to Ind AS, a parent entity may avail certain exemptions provided under Ind AS 101 for determining the deemed cost of its investments in subsidiaries. A question may arise where the parent uses the fair value as deemed cost of an investment in a subsidiary at the date of transition and subsequently wishes to measure that investment at cost. The issue, therefore, is whether the use of fair value as deemed cost under the transition provisions restricts the parent from subsequently applying the cost measurement option available under Ind AS 27 in its separate financial statements.
2.2 Facts A parent company holds an investment in its subsidiary and is preparing its separate financial statements on transition to Ind AS. For the purpose of preparing its opening Ind AS Balance Sheet, the parent company elects to avail the exemption contained in paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101, and measures its investment in the subsidiary at fair value at the date of transition. The fair value so determined is treated as the deemed cost of the investment for the purposes of the opening Ind AS financial statements. The parent company had measured the investment at cost under previous GAAP and, therefore, satisfies the condition for availing the exemption under paragraph D15. A question subsequently arises as to whether, having once selected fair value as deemed cost under Ind AS 101, the parent is required to continue measuring the investment at fair value, or whether it can subsequently elect to measure the investment at cost in accordance with Ind AS 27, Separate Financial Statements. Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
5
2.3 Analysis Paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 provides an exemption relating to investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. Where the conditions prescribed in the paragraph are satisfied, the fair value at the date of transition can be used as the deemed cost of the investment. In the present case, the parent company had measured the investment at cost under previous GAAP and is assumed to have satisfied the conditions for applying paragraph D15. Accordingly, the fair value determined at the date of transition becomes the deemed cost of the investment in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. The transition exemption, however, determines the amount at which the investment is initially recognised for Ind AS purposes. The subsequent accounting for the investment is governed by the applicable requirements of Ind AS 27, Separate Financial Statements. Paragraph 10 of Ind AS 27 permits an entity, in its separate financial statements, to account for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates either: a. at cost, or b. in accordance with Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments.
2.4 Conclusion Therefore, the fact that fair value has been used as deemed cost under Ind AS 101 does not prevent the entity from subsequently applying the cost measurement option under Ind AS 27. Under the previous GAAP, the investment in the subsidiary was measured at cost. On transition to Ind AS, the parent company may avail the exemption under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 and use the fair value of the investment at the date of transition as its deemed cost. Thereafter, the investment is accounted for in accordance with Ind AS 27. Since paragraph 10 of Ind AS 27 permits investments in subsidiaries in separate financial statements to be measured at cost or in accordance with Ind AS 109, the parent company can subsequently account for the investment at cost, notwithstanding that fair value was used as deemed cost at the date of transition. Thus, the use of fair value as deemed cost under Ind AS 101 does not, by itself, preclude the subsequent application of the cost measurement option under Ind AS 27.
3. Debentures of a Subsidiary: Applicability of the Paragraph D15 Exemption under Ind AS 101 3.1 Understanding the Issue The exemption under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 (as discussed in above case study) is relevant to investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. However, a parent entity may hold different types of financial instruments issued by its subsidiary, such as debentures. The mere fact that a financial instrument has been issued by a subsidiary does not automatically bring it within the scope of the investment exemption. The case therefore examines whether debentures held by a parent in
6
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
its subsidiary can qualify for the exemption under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 and the corresponding measurement provisions of Ind AS 27.
3.2 Facts Alpha Manufacturing Limited is the holding company of Beta Automobiles Limited and holds 90% of the voting shares of Beta Automobiles Limited. Accordingly, Beta Automobiles is a subsidiary of Alpha Manufacturing Limited. In addition to its equity investment in the subsidiary, Alpha Manufacturing has also invested in debentures issued by Beta Automobiles. While preparing its financial statements on transition to Ind AS, Alpha Manufacturing Limited considers whether the debenture investment should be treated in the same manner as its equity investment in the subsidiary for the purposes of the transition exemption. Specifically, the issue is whether the investment in debentures falls within the scope of Ind AS 27 and whether Alpha Manufacturing Limited can avail the exemption under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 in respect of such debentures?
3.3 Analysis Ind AS 109 provides that interests in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures accounted for under Ind AS 110, Ind AS 27 or Ind AS 28 are outside the scope of Ind AS 109. However, where these standards require or permit accounting under Ind AS 109, the requirements of Ind AS 109 apply. Paragraph 10 of Ind AS 27 permits investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates in separate financial statements to be accounted for either at cost or in accordance with Ind AS 109. Therefore, the nature of the debentures needs to be determined first. If the debentures meet the definition of equity under Ind AS 32 from the subsidiary’s perspective, they may be considered part of the parent’s investment in the subsidiary and accounted for under Ind AS 27. In such a case, the parent may consider the exemption under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101, subject to its conditions. However, if the debentures do not meet the definition of equity and represent a financial liability of the subsidiary, the parent’s holding represents a financial asset. Where such investment is not covered by Ind AS 27, it is accounted for under Ind AS 109. Accordingly, the mere fact that the debentures are issued by a subsidiary does not make them an investment covered by paragraph D15. The classification of the debentures under Ind AS 32 determines whether they fall within Ind AS 27 and can qualify for the paragraph D15 exemption.
3.4 Conclusion The equity investment and the debenture investment held by Alpha Manufacturing Limited in Beta Automobiles Limited cannot automatically be treated alike merely because both are investments in the same subsidiary.
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
7
Under Ind AS, the nature and classification of the underlying financial instrument must first be determined. Accordingly, the exemption under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 can be availed in respect of the debentures only if the debentures meet the definition of equity under Ind AS 32. Where the debentures are classified as a financial liability under Ind AS 32, the parent cannot avail the paragraph D15 exemption merely on the ground that the issuer is its subsidiary. The case therefore highlights an important transition principle: the relationship between the investor and investee does not, by itself, determine the accounting treatment, the nature of the instrument must also be examined.
4. Treatment of Accumulated Losses of a Subsidiary in Non-controlling Interest 4.1 Understanding the Issue When a subsidiary has accumulated losses, the losses attributable to shareholders other than the parent entity can cause the non-controlling interest (NCI) to have a negative balance. This issue becomes particularly important on first-time adoption of Ind AS because the parent entity may either use the business combination exemption under Ind AS 101 or choose to retrospectively restate past business combinations under Ind AS 103. The case therefore examines how the accumulated losses of a subsidiary are allocated to NCI on the transition date and whether NCI can be reported as a deficit balance in the consolidated financial statements.
4.2 Facts Hector Limited is the parent company of Sector Limited. Thus, Sector is a subsidiary of Hector. However, Sector Limited has shareholders other than Hector Limited, giving rise to a non-controlling interest in the consolidated financial statements of Hector Limited. As at 31st March 2023, Sector Limited has accumulated losses to the extent that its net worth has become negative. Hector Limited is adopting Ind AS for the first time, with 1st April 2023 as its date of transition. At the date of transition, Hector Limited therefore needs to determine how the accumulated losses of Sector Limited should be reflected between the shareholders of Hector and the NCI in the opening consolidated financial statements. The issue becomes relevant because Ind AS 101 provides an exemption in relation to past business combinations. Hector Limited has two alternatives: Alternative 1 – Avail the business combination exemption: Hector Limited may avail the exemption under Appendix C of Ind AS 101 and, accordingly, does not retrospectively restate business combinations that occurred before the date of transition. Ind AS 103 would be applied prospectively to business combinations occurring after the transition date.
8
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
Alternative 2 – Retrospectively apply Ind AS 103: Instead of availing the exemption, Hector Limited may elect to apply Ind AS 103 retrospectively to past business combinations from a date of its choice. In the present case, Hector Limited chooses 1st April 2020 as the date from which past business combinations are retrospectively restated. The question is: How should Hector Limited account for the accumulated losses attributable to NCI in its opening consolidated financial statements under these two alternatives?
4.3 Analysis Alternative 1 Where Hector Limited elects to apply the business combination exemption under Appendix C of Ind AS 101, it does not go back and reconstruct all past business combinations as though Ind AS 103 had always been applied. Instead, Hector Limited applies the Ind AS 101 to business combinations that occurred before the transition date and applies Ind AS 103 prospectively to business combinations occurring after the transition date. Further, Ind AS 101 is relevant for determining the measurement of NCI. It provides that the measurement of NCI and deferred tax follows from the measurement of the other assets and liabilities. Accordingly, where the transition adjustments result in changes to the assets and liabilities of Sector Limited, those adjustments will also affect the amount attributable to NCI. Further, paragraph 94 of Ind AS 110, Consolidated Financial Statements, requires the parent to attribute the profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive income between the owners of the parent and NCI. Importantly, the paragraph specifically states that this attribution is required even if it results in the NCI having a deficit balance. Therefore, the fact that Sector Limited has a negative net worth does not mean that Hector Limited should restrict the NCI balance to zero. To the extent the accumulated losses are attributable to NCI, those losses are also allocated to NCI, resulting in a negative NCI balance, where applicable. The transition adjustments arising from applying Ind AS 101 are adjusted in retained earnings. The resulting NCI is then determined after giving effect to the appropriate allocation of the subsidiary’s losses. Alternative 2 Under the second alternative, Hector Limited chooses not to avail the business combination exemption and instead applies Ind AS 103 retrospectively from 1st April 2020. This means that the relevant past business combinations occurring from that date are restated as though the applicable Ind AS requirements had been applied retrospectively. Consequently, Hector Limited would also determine the NCI retrospectively in accordance with the applicable requirements of Ind AS 110, including paragraph 94.
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
9
The accumulated losses of S Ltd. would therefore be attributed between Hector Limited and the NCI based on the retrospectively determined amounts. Again, if the losses attributable to NCI exceed the amount of NCI’s positive interest, the resulting NCI can be presented as a deficit balance.
4.4 Conclusion The case highlights that, on transition to Ind AS, accumulated losses of a subsidiary may result in a negative balance of non-controlling interest. The treatment depends on whether the entity applies the transition exemption or retrospectively applies Ind AS 103. In either case, Ind AS 110 requires the losses to be attributed to NCI, even if this results in a deficit balance.
5. Conclusion The case studies discussed in this article highlight that first-time adoption of Ind AS is not merely a matter of carrying forward the accounting treatment followed under previous GAAP. The transition exercise requires an entity to identify the relevant provisions of Ind AS 101 and consider how the exemptions and transition requirements interact with the applicable Ind AS. The cases relating to investments in subsidiaries demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between the transition measurement and subsequent accounting. The use of fair value as deemed cost under paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101 does not, by itself, prevent an entity from subsequently applying the cost measurement option available under Ind AS 27. Similarly, in the case of debentures held in a subsidiary, the nature and classification of the instrument under Ind AS 32 is relevant in determining whether the exemption under paragraph D15 can be applied. The case concerning accumulated losses of a subsidiary further illustrates the significance of the transition choices available under Ind AS 101. Where losses attributable to non-controlling interests result in a deficit balance, paragraph 94 of Ind AS 110 requires such losses to be attributed to NCI even where this results in a negative balance. Overall, these cases demonstrate that an appropriate transition to Ind AS requires a careful assessment of the underlying facts, the nature of the transaction, the applicable transition exemptions and the requirements of the relevant Ind AS. A clear understanding of these provisions is essential to ensure that the opening Ind AS financial statements and subsequent accounting appropriately reflect the requirements of the standards.
10
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Provisions for Investments in Subsidiaries, Debentures and Non-controlling Interests through Case Studies
About Us
Our Journey Founded
1972
Evolution
From a small family business to a leading technology-oriented Publishing/Product company
Expansion
Launch of Taxmann Advisory for personalized consulting solutions
Our Vision
Aim
Growth
Future
Achieve perfection, skill, and accuracy in all endeavour
Evolution into a company with strong independent divisions: Research & Editorial, Production, Sales & Marketing, and Technology
Continuously providing practical solutions through Taxmann Advisory
Our Strength Core Editorial and Research Division
Team Over 200 motivated legal professionals (Lawyers, Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries)
Expertise Monitoring and processing developments in judicial, administrative, and legislative fields with unparalleled skill and accuracy
Impact Helping businesses navigate complex tax and regulatory requirements with ease
Taxmann Today Legacy
Innovation
Commitment
Over 60 years of domain knowledge and trust
Technology-driven solutions for modern challenges
Ensuring perfection, skill, and accuracy in every solution provided
Our Core Domain Areas Income Tax Corporate Tax Advisory Trusts & NGO Consultancy TDS Advisory Global Mobility Services Personal Taxation Training Due Diligence
Goods & Services Tax Transaction Advisory Business Restructuring Classification & Rate Advisory Due Diligence Training Trade Facilitation Measures
Foreign Exchange Management Laws
UAE Corporate Tax
Due Dilligence Advisory Services Assistance in compounding of offences Transactions Services Investment outside India
Corporate Tax Advisory Corporate Structuring VAT Advisory Residential Status
Your Partners for Frictionless Advice Tax Advisory High-quality advice for all your Income-tax, GST, FEMA, and UAE Corporate Tax queries From a distinguished panel of experts
Tax Research Support Get real-time research support
Tax Restructuring and Implementation Support
By a team of trained researchers
Structure your business and processes in a tax-efficient way
To upscale the quality of your advice
Implement the SOPs for tax compliances
And save your manpower cost
Automate your ERPs to handle tax compliances
A Glimpse of the People Behind Taxmann
Naveen Wadhwa
Vinod K. Singhania
V.S. Datey
Research and Advisory [Corporate and Personal Tax]
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory (Direct Tax)
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax]
Chartered Accountant (All India 24th Rank)
Over 35 years of experience in tax laws
Holds 30+ years of experience
14+ years of experience in Income tax and International Tax
PhD in Corporate Economics and Legislation
Engaged in consulting and training professionals on Indirect Taxation
Expertise across real estate, technology, publication, education, hospitality, and manufacturing sectors
Author and resource person in 800+ seminars
A regular speaker at various industry forums, associations and industry workshops Author of various books on Indirect Taxation used by professionals and Department officials
Contributor to renowned media outlets on tax issues
S.S. Gupta
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax] Chartered Accountant and Cost & Works Accountant 34+ Years of Experience in Indirect Taxation Bestowed with numerous prestigious scholarships and prizes Author of the book GST – How to Meet Your Obligations', which is widely referred to by Trade and Industry
Manoj Fogla
Nirav Shah
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Charitable Trusts and NGOs]
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [UAE Corporate Tax]
Over three decades of practising experience on tax, legal and regulatory aspects of NPOs and Charitable Institutions
25+ years of experience and practicing in the UAE
Law practitioner, a fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and also holds a Master's degree in Philosophy
Has previously worked with the KPMG
PhD from Utkal University, Doctoral Research on Social Accountability Standards for NPOs Author of several best-selling books for professionals, including the recent one titled 'Trust and NGO's Ready Reckoner' by Taxmann Drafted publications for The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, such as FAQs on GST for NPOs & FAQs on FCRA for NPOs. Has been a faculty and resource person at various national and international forums
Chartered Accountant (All India 36th Rank)
Contact Us Taxmann Delhi 59/32, New Rohtak Road New Delhi – 110005 | India Phone | 011 45562222 Email | sales@taxmann.com Taxmann Mumbai 35, Bodke Building, Ground Floor, M.G. Road, Mulund (West), Opp. Mulund Railway Station Mumbai – 400080 | Maharashtra | India Phone | +91 93222 47686 Email | sales.mumbai@taxmann.com Taxmann Pune Office No. 14, First Floor, Prestige Point, 283 Shukrwar Peth, Bajirao Road, Opp. Chinchechi Talim, Pune – 411002 | Maharashtra | India Phone | +91 98224 11811 Email | sales.pune@taxmann.com Taxmann Ahmedabad 7, Abhinav Arcade, Ground Floor, Pritam Nagar Paldi Ahmedabad – 380007 | Gujarat | India Phone: +91 99099 84900 Email: sales.ahmedabad@taxmann.com Taxmann Hyderabad 4-1-369 Indralok Commercial Complex Shop No. 15/1 – Ground Floor, Reddy Hostel Lane Abids Hyderabad – 500001 | Telangana | India Phone | +91 93910 41461 Email | sales.hyderabad@taxmann.com Taxmann Chennai No. 26, 2, Rajan St, Rama Kamath Puram, T. Nagar Chennai – 600017 | Tamil Nadu | India Phone | +91 89390 09948 Email | sales.chennai@taxmann.com
www.taxmann.com
Taxmann Bengaluru 12/1, Nirmal Nivas, Ground Floor, 4th Cross, Gandhi Nagar Bengaluru – 560009 | Karnataka | India Phone | +91 99869 50066 Email | sales.bengaluru@taxmann.com Taxmann Kolkata Nigam Centre, 155-Lenin Sarani, Wellington, 2nd Floor, Room No. 213 Kolkata – 700013 | West Bengal | India Phone | +91 98300 71313 Email | sales.kolkata@taxmann.com Taxmann Lucknow House No. LIG – 4/40, Sector – H, Jankipuram Lucknow – 226021 | Uttar Pradesh | India Phone | +91 97924 23987 Email | sales.lucknow@taxmann.com Taxmann Bhubaneswar Plot No. 591, Nayapalli, Near Damayanti Apartments Bhubaneswar – 751012 | Odisha | India Phone | +91 99370 71353 Email | sales.bhubaneswar@taxmann.com Taxmann Guwahati House No. 2, Samnaay Path, Sawauchi Dakshin Gaon Road Guwahati – 781040 | Assam | India Phone | +91 70866 24504 Email | sales.guwahati@taxmann.com