Skip to main content

Taxmann's Analysis | Ind AS 101: PPE Transition Accounting & Deemed Cost – Part I

Page 1

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I

CA Prajwal Jha

CA Bhawna Grover

Assistant Manager Research and Advisory, Taxmann

Manager - Research and Advisory, Taxmann


Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I

CA Prajwal Jha

CA Bhawna Grover

Assistant Manager Research and Advisory, Taxmann

Manager - Research and Advisory, Taxmann


Contents 1.

Introduction

5

2. Relevant accounting requirements

5

3. Practical case study: Applying fair value as deemed cost

7

4. Key practical considerations for finance teams and auditors

10

5. Conclusion

11


1.

Introduction

The transition from Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (previous GAAP) to Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) can significantly affect the measurement and presentation of property, plant and equipment (PPE). Although both AS 10, Property, Plant and Equipment, and Ind AS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, establish requirements for recognising and measuring tangible assets, differences in accounting requirements and the transition choices available under Ind AS 101, First-time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards, can affect the carrying amount of PPE reported in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. One of the most practically significant transition provisions concerns the deemed cost exemption. An entity transitioning to Ind AS may elect to measure an item of PPE at its fair value at the date of transition and use that fair value as its deemed cost. Alternatively, , it may use a previous-GAAP carrying amount or a previous-GAAP revaluation as deemed cost. This election can simplify the reconstruction of historical cost and accumulated depreciation, particularly for long-held assets for which reliable historical records may be difficult to obtain. The deemed cost exemption is an optional transition relief, not a general requirement to revalue all existing PPE. The accounting consequences depend on the option selected, the assets covered by the election and the relevant transition-date carrying amounts. The article uses a numerical case study to explain transition accounting in which an entity elects to use fair value as deemed cost for an existing item of machinery.

2. Relevant accounting requirements Let us understand the relevant accounting requirements for the accounting of property, plant and equipment under AS 10 and Ind AS 16.

2.1

Accounting under AS 10 - Property, Plant and Equipment

Under the previous GAAP framework, AS 10 prescribed the accounting treatment for property, plant and equipment, including the determination of cost, recognition of subsequent expenditure, depreciation and derecognition. Under the cost model, an item of PPE was generally carried at its cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, where applicable. Cost included the purchase price and directly attributable costs necessary to bring the asset to the location and condition required for its intended use. AS 10 also permitted an entity to adopt a revaluation approach for an entire class of assets, subject to the applicable requirements. Consequently, an entity’s previous-GAAP carrying amount might reflect historical cost or a revalued amount, depending on the accounting policy adopted and the transactions undertaken. For transition purposes, an important point is that an entity does not automatically need to reconstruct every asset’s original cost and accumulated depreciation merely because it is adopting Ind AS. Ind AS 101 provides specific reliefs that may be elected. Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I

5


2.2

Accounting under Ind AS 16 – Property, Plant and Equipment

Ind AS 16 establishes the principles for recognising PPE, determining its carrying amount and recognising depreciation and impairment losses. An item of PPE is recognised as an asset when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the entity and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. At initial recognition, an item of PPE that qualifies for recognition is measured at cost. After initial recognition, Ind AS 16 permits an entity to select either the cost model or the revaluation model as its accounting policy for an entire class of PPE, subject to consistent application and the requirements of the relevant model. Under the cost model, an asset is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Under the revaluation model, an asset whose fair value can be measured reliably is carried at its revalued amount, being fair value at the date of revaluation less subsequent accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The distinction between the revaluation model and the deemed cost exemption is important. The revaluation model is a subsequent-measurement accounting policy under Ind AS 16, whereas deemed cost is a measurement basis available under Ind AS 101 at the date of transition. An entity can elect fair value as deemed cost at transition and subsequently apply the cost model under Ind AS 16.

2.3

Deemed cost exemption under Ind AS 101

Ind AS 101 ordinarily requires a first-time adopter to prepare an opening Ind AS Balance Sheet at the date of transition and apply Ind AS recognition and measurement requirements retrospectively, subject to the exemptions and exceptions specified in the standard. Paragraphs D5–D8 of Ind AS 101 contain the relevant deemed cost provisions for PPE and certain other assets. As per paragraph D5, a first-time adopter may elect to measure an item of PPE at its fair value at the date of transition to Ind AS and use that fair value as its deemed cost at that date. This election can be made item by item, subject to the applicable requirements. Paragraph D6 also permits a first-time adopter to use a previous-GAAP revaluation of an item of PPE at or before the date of transition as deemed cost, provided the revaluation was, at the date of revaluation, broadly comparable to: a.

fair value or

b.

cost or depreciated cost under Ind AS, adjusted to reflect, for example, changes in a general or specific price index.

Accordingly, a qualifying previous GAAP revaluation may be retained as deemed cost rather than requiring the entity to determine a new fair value at the transition date. The deemed cost election is optional. If an entity does not elect the exemption for an item, it generally applies the relevant Ind AS 16 requirements retrospectively in accordance with Ind AS 101, subject to other applicable exemptions and mandatory exceptions.

6

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I


2.4 What happens when fair value is elected as deemed cost? When an entity elects fair value as deemed cost for an item of PPE, the fair value at the transition date becomes the asset’s deemed cost from that date. The entity does not simply add the difference between fair value and previous-GAAP carrying amount to the asset while continuing to treat the previous-GAAP accumulated depreciation as if nothing changed. Instead, the deemed-cost election establishes a new measurement basis for the asset in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. The practical implications are as follows: a.

The asset is recognised in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet at its elected fair value.

b.

The difference between that fair value and the previous-GAAP carrying amount is reflected in the transition adjustments, generally through opening retained earnings or another appropriate component of equity, as required by the circumstances.

c.

Depreciation after the transition date is calculated using the deemed cost, residual value and remaining useful life determined under Ind AS 16.

d.

The entity must assess other relevant Ind AS requirements, including impairment under Ind AS 36 and deferred tax under Ind AS 12.

A deemed-cost election does not exempt the entity from applying all other relevant Ind AS requirements. For example, the entity must still consider whether the asset contains significant components with different useful lives and whether its depreciation method, residual value and useful life comply with Ind AS 16.

3. Practical case study: Applying fair value as deemed cost Let us understand the transition accounting of property plant and equipment with the help of case study.

3.1

Facts:

Aster Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the company”) is an Indian manufacturing entity that has historically prepared its financial statements in accordance with Indian GAAP, including AS 10. The company is required to prepare its first Ind AS financial statements for the year ending 31st March 2026. The date of transition to Ind AS is 1st April 2024. Accordingly, the company must prepare its opening Ind AS Balance Sheet as at that date in accordance with Ind AS 101. The company owns a specialised manufacturing machine that was purchased and installed on 1st April 2019. The machine was available for use from that date and has been depreciated under the company’s previous-GAAP accounting policy. At the date of transition, the company decides to elect the exemption under Ind AS 101 and measure the machine at its fair value on 1st April 2024. The following information is available:

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I

7


Particulars

Amount

Original cost of machine on 1 April 2019

₹10,00,000

Accumulated depreciation under previous GAAP as at 31 March 2024

₹5,00,000

Previous-GAAP carrying amount as at 31 March 2024

₹5,00,000

Fair value of machine as at 1st April 2024

₹6,50,000

Remaining useful life at transition date

5 years

Estimated residual value at transition date

Nil

For this illustration, assume that the fair value of ₹6,50,000 is reliably determined at 1st April 2024 and that the company elects to use it as deemed cost for this machine. The company intends to apply the cost model under Ind AS 16 after transition. For simplicity, the numerical workings below exclude income-tax effects. In an actual transition, the company must separately determine the tax base of the machine and recognise any resulting deferred tax asset or liability in accordance with Ind AS 12. The key issue is how the company should account for the machine in its opening Ind AS Balance Sheet as at 1st April 2024 when its previous-GAAP carrying amount is ₹5,00,000 but its elected fair value as deemed cost is ₹6,50,000.

3.2

Analysis

Accounting under AS 10 Under the previous-GAAP framework, the machine was initially recognised at its cost of ₹10,00,000. Assuming straight-line depreciation over its original useful life of 10 years, with no residual value, annual depreciation was ₹1,00,000. The machine was purchased on 1st April 2019 and was available for use from that date. Accordingly, five years of depreciation had been recognised by 31st March 2024. The carrying amount under previous GAAP is calculated as follows: Particulars

Amount

Original cost of machine on 1 April 2019

₹10,00,000

Less. Accumulated depreciation (₹1,00,000 * 5 years)

(₹5,00,000)

Carrying amount as at 31st March 2024

₹5,00,000

Accounting treatment under Ind AS 101 and Ind AS 16 On transition, the company the optional exemption of Ind AS 101 to the machine. Consequently, the fair value of ₹6,50,000 at 1st April 2024 is used as the deemed cost of the machine in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. The transition adjustment is the difference between the deemed cost and the previous-GAAP carrying amount.

8

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I


Particulars

Amount

Fair value elected as deemed cost under Ind AS 101

₹6,50,000

Less. Previous GAAP carrying amount

(₹5,00,000)

Increase in carrying amount on transition

₹1,50,000

The carrying amount of PPE therefore increases by ₹1,50,000 on transition. This increase is not recognised as revaluation income in the statement of profit and loss for the year ending 31st March 2025. It is an adjustment arising from the preparation of the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet under Ind AS 101 and is generally reflected in opening retained earnings, subject to any other applicable accounting requirements, including deferred tax.

3.3

Journal entry on 1st April 2024

Assuming no related deferred tax adjustment and no other relevant transition considerations, the transition entry is: Particulars Property, plant and equipment A/c

Debit (₹)

Credit (₹)

₹1,50,000

To Opening retained earnings A/c

₹1,50,000

(Being increase in the carrying amount of machinery arising from the election to use fair value as deemed cost under)

The entry illustrates the transition adjustment in substance. In practice, the company should prepare its opening Ind AS Balance Sheet using the deemed cost as the measurement basis and ensure that the asset’s gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation presentation are consistent with the chosen transition accounting and reporting system.

3.4 Presentation in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet The impact of the deemed-cost election on the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet as at 1st April 2024 is set out below. Particulars

Previous-GAAP carrying amount (₹)

Property, plant and ₹5,00,000 equipment

Transition Adjustment (₹) ₹1,50,000

Opening Ind AS amount (₹) ₹6,50,000

The table shows the impact of this individual adjustment only. The company’s complete opening Ind AS Balance Sheet would also include all other adjustments arising from the application of Ind AS, including any related deferred tax consequences.

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I

9


3.5

Depreciation after transition under Ind AS 16

Once the company has elected fair value as deemed cost, the depreciation charge after transition is determined using the deemed cost, residual value and remaining useful life in accordance with Ind AS 16. Based on the case facts: Deemed cost: ₹6,50,000 Residual value: Nil Remaining useful life: 5 years Assuming the straight-line method remains appropriate, annual depreciation after transition is calculated as follows: Annual Depreciation = (Deemed Cost – Residual Value)/ Remaining Useful Life = (₹6,50,000-0)/5 = ₹1,30,000 Accordingly, the company recognises depreciation of ₹1,30,000 per year for the remaining five-year useful life, subject to reassessment of useful life, residual value and depreciation method when required by Ind AS 16. The transition adjustment therefore affects not only the opening carrying amount of PPE but also the depreciation expense recognised in subsequent reporting periods.

4. Key practical considerations for finance teams and auditors The deemed-cost election is often useful for entities holding long-lived assets, especially where reconstructing original cost, historical depreciation or past capitalisation records would be difficult or costly. However, the election should not be treated as a substitute for a proper transition exercise. Finance teams should consider the following matters: a.

Document the election

Identify the PPE items covered by the deemed-cost election and retain evidence of the decision made under Ind AS 101. b.

Support the fair value

Maintain appropriate valuation workings and supporting evidence for the fair value determined at the transition date. c.

Review depreciation estimates

Determine the remaining useful life, residual value and depreciation method under Ind AS 16.

10

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I


d.

Assess component accounting Where significant parts of an item of PPE have different useful lives, assess the requirements for separate depreciation of significant components.

e.

Consider impairment The deemed-cost election does not remove the need to assess impairment under Ind AS 36.

f.

Evaluate deferred tax Determine the tax base and assess the deferred tax implications of the transition adjustment under Ind AS 12.

g.

Ensure appropriate disclosures Explain the transition elections and their effect on the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet and financial position, as required by Ind AS 101 and other applicable standards.

5. Conclusion The transition from AS 10 to Ind AS 16 requires an entity to apply the recognition and measurement requirements of Ind AS, subject to the specific exemptions and exceptions available under Ind AS 101. The deemed-cost exemption under paragraph D5 is an optional relief that allows a first-time adopter to use the fair value of an item of PPE at the date of transition as its deemed cost. In the case of Aster Limited, the election increases the machine’s carrying amount from ₹5,00,000 under previous GAAP to ₹6,50,000 in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. The resulting increase of ₹1,50,000 is reflected as a transition adjustment rather than as current-period revaluation income. Subsequent depreciation is calculated using the deemed cost and the remaining useful life in accordance with Ind AS 16. The key practical lesson is that the deemed-cost election is a transition mechanism, not a blanket requirement to revalue PPE. Entities should carefully document their elections, support fair value measurements, evaluate the resulting impact on equity and deferred tax, and apply Ind AS 16 consistently to depreciation and subsequent measurement.

Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs Transition Accounting with Adjustment Entries for Property Plant and Equipment Part –I

11


About Us


Our Journey Founded

1972

Evolution

From a small family business to a leading technology-oriented Publishing/Product company

Expansion

Launch of Taxmann Advisory for personalized consulting solutions

Our Vision

Aim

Growth

Future

Achieve perfection, skill, and accuracy in all endeavour

Evolution into a company with strong independent divisions: Research & Editorial, Production, Sales & Marketing, and Technology

Continuously providing practical solutions through Taxmann Advisory


Our Strength Core Editorial and Research Division

Team Over 200 motivated legal professionals (Lawyers, Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries)

Expertise Monitoring and processing developments in judicial, administrative, and legislative fields with unparalleled skill and accuracy

Impact Helping businesses navigate complex tax and regulatory requirements with ease

Taxmann Today Legacy

Innovation

Commitment

Over 60 years of domain knowledge and trust

Technology-driven solutions for modern challenges

Ensuring perfection, skill, and accuracy in every solution provided


Our Core Domain Areas Income Tax Corporate Tax Advisory Trusts & NGO Consultancy TDS Advisory Global Mobility Services Personal Taxation Training Due Diligence

Goods & Services Tax Transaction Advisory Business Restructuring Classification & Rate Advisory Due Diligence Training Trade Facilitation Measures

Foreign Exchange Management Laws

UAE Corporate Tax

Due Dilligence Advisory Services Assistance in compounding of offences Transactions Services Investment outside India

Corporate Tax Advisory Corporate Structuring VAT Advisory Residential Status

Your Partners for Frictionless Advice Tax Advisory High-quality advice for all your Income-tax, GST, FEMA, and UAE Corporate Tax queries From a distinguished panel of experts

Tax Research Support Get real-time research support

Tax Restructuring and Implementation Support

By a team of trained researchers

Structure your business and processes in a tax-efficient way

To upscale the quality of your advice

Implement the SOPs for tax compliances

And save your manpower cost

Automate your ERPs to handle tax compliances


A Glimpse of the People Behind Taxmann

Naveen Wadhwa

Vinod K. Singhania

V.S. Datey

Research and Advisory [Corporate and Personal Tax]

Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory (Direct Tax)

Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax]

Chartered Accountant (All India 24th Rank)

Over 35 years of experience in tax laws

Holds 30+ years of experience

14+ years of experience in Income tax and International Tax

PhD in Corporate Economics and Legislation

Engaged in consulting and training professionals on Indirect Taxation

Expertise across real estate, technology, publication, education, hospitality, and manufacturing sectors

Author and resource person in 800+ seminars

A regular speaker at various industry forums, associations and industry workshops Author of various books on Indirect Taxation used by professionals and Department officials

Contributor to renowned media outlets on tax issues

S.S. Gupta

Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax] Chartered Accountant and Cost & Works Accountant 34+ Years of Experience in Indirect Taxation Bestowed with numerous prestigious scholarships and prizes Author of the book GST – How to Meet Your Obligations', which is widely referred to by Trade and Industry

Manoj Fogla

Nirav Shah

Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Charitable Trusts and NGOs]

Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [UAE Corporate Tax]

Over three decades of practising experience on tax, legal and regulatory aspects of NPOs and Charitable Institutions

25+ years of experience and practicing in the UAE

Law practitioner, a fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and also holds a Master's degree in Philosophy

Has previously worked with the KPMG

PhD from Utkal University, Doctoral Research on Social Accountability Standards for NPOs Author of several best-selling books for professionals, including the recent one titled 'Trust and NGO's Ready Reckoner' by Taxmann Drafted publications for The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, such as FAQs on GST for NPOs & FAQs on FCRA for NPOs. Has been a faculty and resource person at various national and international forums

Chartered Accountant (All India 36th Rank)


Contact Us Taxmann Delhi 59/32, New Rohtak Road New Delhi – 110005 | India Phone | 011 45562222 Email | sales@taxmann.com Taxmann Mumbai 35, Bodke Building, Ground Floor, M.G. Road, Mulund (West), Opp. Mulund Railway Station Mumbai – 400080 | Maharashtra | India Phone | +91 93222 47686 Email | sales.mumbai@taxmann.com Taxmann Pune Office No. 14, First Floor, Prestige Point, 283 Shukrwar Peth, Bajirao Road, Opp. Chinchechi Talim, Pune – 411002 | Maharashtra | India Phone | +91 98224 11811 Email | sales.pune@taxmann.com Taxmann Ahmedabad 7, Abhinav Arcade, Ground Floor, Pritam Nagar Paldi Ahmedabad – 380007 | Gujarat | India Phone: +91 99099 84900 Email: sales.ahmedabad@taxmann.com Taxmann Hyderabad 4-1-369 Indralok Commercial Complex Shop No. 15/1 – Ground Floor, Reddy Hostel Lane Abids Hyderabad – 500001 | Telangana | India Phone | +91 93910 41461 Email | sales.hyderabad@taxmann.com Taxmann Chennai No. 26, 2, Rajan St, Rama Kamath Puram, T. Nagar Chennai – 600017 | Tamil Nadu | India Phone | +91 89390 09948 Email | sales.chennai@taxmann.com

www.taxmann.com

Taxmann Bengaluru 12/1, Nirmal Nivas, Ground Floor, 4th Cross, Gandhi Nagar Bengaluru – 560009 | Karnataka | India Phone | +91 99869 50066 Email | sales.bengaluru@taxmann.com Taxmann Kolkata Nigam Centre, 155-Lenin Sarani, Wellington, 2nd Floor, Room No. 213 Kolkata – 700013 | West Bengal | India Phone | +91 98300 71313 Email | sales.kolkata@taxmann.com Taxmann Lucknow House No. LIG – 4/40, Sector – H, Jankipuram Lucknow – 226021 | Uttar Pradesh | India Phone | +91 97924 23987 Email | sales.lucknow@taxmann.com Taxmann Bhubaneswar Plot No. 591, Nayapalli, Near Damayanti Apartments Bhubaneswar – 751012 | Odisha | India Phone | +91 99370 71353 Email | sales.bhubaneswar@taxmann.com Taxmann Guwahati House No. 2, Samnaay Path, Sawauchi Dakshin Gaon Road Guwahati – 781040 | Assam | India Phone | +91 70866 24504 Email | sales.guwahati@taxmann.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Taxmann's Analysis | Ind AS 101: PPE Transition Accounting & Deemed Cost – Part I by Taxmann - Issuu