Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs
CA PRAJWAL
JHA Associate - Research and Advisory, Taxmann
CA BHAWNA
GROVER Manager - Research and Advisory, Taxmann
Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs
A Comprehensive Practical Guide to First-time Adoption under Ind AS 101
CA
PRAJWAL JHA Associate - Research and Advisory, Taxmann
CA BHAWNA GROVER Manager - Research and Advisory, Taxmann
Taxmann presents Practical Insights on Ind AS and SAs, a weekly series exclusively for Accounts and Audit Module subscribers of Taxmann.com, focusing on the practical application of Ind AS and Standards on Auditing through structured, issue-based analysis.
1. Introduction
The adoption of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) marked a significant shift in India’s financial reporting framework by aligning domestic accounting practices with globally accepted principles. However, for entities that had historically prepared financial statements under the previous Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Indian GAAP), the transition involved much more than adopting a new set of accounting standards. It required a reassessment of accounting policies, measurement bases, presentation requirements and disclosures, while ensuring that the financial statements continued to present a true and fair view of the entity’s financial position and performance.
Unlike a newly incorporated entity that applies Ind AS from the date of its incorporation, an existing entity transitioning from previous GAAP carries years of historical accounting records, estimates and judgements that were prepared under a different accounting framework. Reconstructing those records retrospectively in accordance with Ind AS can be both complex and resource intensive. At the same time, allowing entities to adopt Ind AS prospectively would impair comparability and diminish the usefulness of financial statements.
Ind AS 101, First-time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards addresses this challenge by providing a structured transition framework. It establishes the principles that an entity must follow while preparing its first Ind AS financial statements, ensuring that the information presented is transparent, comparable across reporting periods and provides a suitable starting point for accounting under Ind AS. While the standard is founded on the principle of retrospective application, it also recognises that full retrospective implementation may not always be practicable. Accordingly, it incorporates a balanced framework of mandatory exceptions and optional exemptions that enable entities to achieve a smooth transition without compromising the quality of financial reporting.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of the transition framework under Ind AS 101. It discusses the key principles governing first-time adoption, explains the rationale behind retrospective application, analyses the mandatory exceptions and optional exemptions available to first-time adopters and concludes with the presentation, disclosure and practical implementation considerations that entities should keep in mind while transitioning to Ind AS.
2. Understanding the Transition Framework
Ind AS 101 applies when an entity prepares its first annual financial statements containing an explicit and unreserved statement of compliance with Ind AS. The transition formally
begins with the preparation of the Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet as at the date of transition, which serves as the starting point for accounting under Ind AS. Every adjustment arising on transition is ultimately reflected in this balance sheet, making it the foundation on which all future financial reporting under Ind AS is built.
The objective of the transition framework is straightforward, to ensure that the entity’s first Ind AS financial statements are prepared on a basis that is fully compliant with Ind AS while remaining comparable with subsequent reporting periods. To achieve this objective, Ind AS 101 generally requires an entity to apply the accounting policies effective at the end of its first Ind AS reporting period retrospectively, as though those policies had always been applied. This enables users of financial statements to compare financial information across periods without the distortions that could arise if previous GAAP accounting continued to influence the reported results.
From a practical perspective, the transition process revolves around four fundamental adjustments. First, assets and liabilities required by Ind AS but not recognised under previous GAAP are recognised in the Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. Secondly, assets and liabilities recognised under previous GAAP but not permitted under Ind AS are derecognised. Thirdly, certain items continue to be recognised but require reclassification to comply with the presentation requirements of Ind AS. Finally, all recognised assets and liabilities are measured in accordance with the applicable Ind AS, which may result in changes to their carrying amounts. These four adjustments collectively transform the previous GAAP balance sheet into the Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet and form the backbone of the transition process.
While this approach ensures consistency and comparability, it also presents significant practical challenges. Historical records may be incomplete, valuation information may no longer be available and certain accounting outcomes may depend on information that was not required under previous GAAP. Applying retrospective accounting in such circumstances may either become impracticable or require the use of hindsight, thereby affecting the reliability of financial information.
Recognising the aforementioned practical constraints, Ind AS 101 departs from its general principle of retrospective application in specified situations by prescribing mandatory exceptions and permitting optional exemptions. Understanding the distinction between these two categories is essential, as they form the cornerstone of the transition framework and significantly influence the accounting choices available to first-time adopters.
3. Why Retrospective Application Needs Relief
Retrospective application is the cornerstone of Ind AS 101. By requiring an entity to apply the accounting policies effective at the end of its first Ind AS reporting period as if they had always been in force, the standard seeks to ensure that the financial statements are comparable across all periods presented. However, reconstructing every historical transaction in accordance with the new framework may require information that is no longer available, involve significant cost and effort, or even necessitate the use of hindsight.
In such cases, insisting on complete retrospective application could undermine rather than enhance the reliability of financial reporting.
Recognising these practical realities, Ind AS 101 adopts a balanced approach. While retrospective application remains the general rule, the standard identifies specific situations where strict retrospective application is either inappropriate or impracticable. These reliefs are categorised into mandatory exceptions and optional exemptions, each serving a distinct purpose in the transition process.
Mandatory exceptions are not a matter of choice. They identify areas where retrospective application is either prohibited or modified because doing otherwise would require the use of hindsight or could result in information that is inconsistent with the underlying principles of Ind AS. Consequently, every first-time adopter is required to apply these exceptions while preparing its Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet.
Optional exemptions, on the other hand, recognise that although retrospective application may be conceptually desirable, the effort involved in reconstructing historical information may outweigh the benefits. Accordingly, Ind AS 101 allows entities to elect certain practical reliefs that simplify the transition process while continuing to achieve the overall objective of presenting high-quality financial statements. These exemptions are optional, enabling management to choose the approach that best reflects the entity’s circumstances and the availability of historical information.
The distinction between these two categories is fundamental. Mandatory exceptions define the circumstances in which retrospective application cannot be applied, whereas optional exemptions identify situations where the standard permits a departure from retrospective application as a matter of practical convenience. Together, they ensure that the transition to Ind AS remains both conceptually robust and operationally feasible.
4. Mandatory Exceptions
Although Ind AS 101 is founded on the principle of retrospective application, there are certain areas where applying the requirements of Ind AS to past transactions would either require hindsight or produce outcomes that are inconsistent with the underlying accounting principles. In such situations, the standard does not permit entities to choose between retrospective and prospective application. Instead, it prescribes mandatory exceptions that every first-time adopter must apply while preparing its Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet.
These exceptions are designed to preserve the reliability and objectivity of financial reporting. Rather than requiring entities to recreate historical circumstances or reassess decisions made years earlier, they ensure that the transition is based on information that was available when those transactions originally occurred. The major mandatory exceptions under Ind AS 101 relate to estimates, derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities, hedge accounting, classification and measurement of financial instruments, impairment, embedded derivatives, government loans, deferred taxes relating to leases and decommissioning obligations, and non-controlling interests.
Let us briefly understand these exceptions
4.1. Understanding the different Mandatory Exceptions under Ind AS 101
Accounting estimates play a crucial role in financial reporting as they are based on the information and circumstances existing at the reporting date. Since estimates are inherently judgemental, they cannot be revisited merely because additional information becomes available after that date. Ind AS 101, therefore, requires estimates at the date of transition to be consistent with those made under the previous GAAP unless those estimates were erroneous. This ensures that first-time adoption does not become a mechanism for revising historical judgements with the benefit of hindsight.
While estimates represent one aspect where hindsight could compromise the reliability of financial reporting, similar concerns arise in relation to the derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. Transactions involving the transfer or extinguishment of financial instruments are generally completed based on the facts and contractual arrangements existing at that point in time. Revisiting such transactions several years later by applying the derecognition requirements of Ind AS 109 retrospectively could lead to accounting outcomes that do not faithfully represent the economic substance of the transactions when they originally occurred.
Recognising this practical challenge, Ind AS 101 provides a mandatory exception in respect of derecognition. Thus, the financial assets and financial liabilities derecognised under the previous GAAP before the transition date are generally not recognised again in the Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet merely because the derecognition requirements under Ind AS 109 would have resulted in a different accounting outcome. Consequently, firsttime adopters are not required to reconstruct historical securitisation arrangements, assignment of receivables or similar transactions that had already been completed before transition. This significantly reduces the complexity of transition while preserving the integrity of historical accounting records.
However, this relief is not absolute. There are circumstances in which an entity may apply the derecognition requirements of Ind AS 109 retrospectively, provided the information necessary to do so was available at the time the transactions were originally accounted for. In such cases, retrospective application does not involve the use of hindsight and therefore remains consistent with the overall objective of Ind AS 101.
Another area where retrospective application could become problematic relates to hedge accounting. Unlike many other accounting requirements, hedge accounting is based on contemporaneous documentation of the hedging relationship, identification of the hedged item and hedging instrument, and an assessment of hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge. These requirements are intended to demonstrate that the hedge designation existed when the transaction was originally undertaken. Attempting to create such documentation retrospectively would undermine the discipline embedded in the hedge accounting framework.
Accordingly, a first-time adopter cannot retrospectively designate hedging relationships solely for the purpose of transition to Ind AS. Hedge accounting in the Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet is therefore recognised only where the qualifying conditions prescribed under Ind AS 109 were satisfied at the relevant time. Existing hedging relationships that continue to satisfy those conditions may be carried forward on transition, whereas relationships that fail to meet the prescribed criteria cannot be retrospectively designated merely because the entity has now adopted Ind AS. This exception reinforces the broader principle that transition should not permit the creation of accounting relationships that did not exist historically.
The discussion on estimates, derecognition and hedge accounting highlights a common thread running through the mandatory exceptions. In each of these areas, the objective is not to provide a concession to first-time adopters but to preserve the reliability of financial reporting by preventing the use of hindsight. The same philosophy also underlies the remaining mandatory exceptions relating to financial instruments, impairment, embedded derivatives, government loans, deferred tax and non-controlling interests, each of which addresses a specific aspect of retrospective application where practical or conceptual limitations arise.
While mandatory exceptions identify situations where retrospective application is either prohibited or modified, they represent only one part of the transition framework. In practice, entities often devote considerably more attention to the optional exemptions available under Ind AS 101. Unlike mandatory exceptions, these exemptions do not override the general principle of retrospective application. Instead, they provide practical relief in areas where reconstructing historical information may involve significant cost and effort without producing commensurate benefits for the users of financial statements.
Click here to read the detailed article on Mandatory Exceptions
5. Optional Exemptions
Ind AS 101 permits first-time adopters to avail certain optional exemptions that simplify the transition process while continuing to achieve the overall objective of high-quality financial reporting.
These exemptions are optional in nature. An entity may elect to apply an exemption where it considers the relief appropriate in the light of its facts and circumstances. However, once an exemption is selected, it is required to be applied in accordance with the specific conditions prescribed under Ind AS 101. Accordingly, the choice does not lie in whether the exemption is applied correctly, but in whether the entity elects to avail the exemption in the first place.
Among the various optional exemptions available under Ind AS 101, those relating to the measurement of assets assume particular significance. This is because the carrying amounts recognised in the Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet form the basis for depreciation, impairment, disposal gains or losses and several other accounting consequences in subsequent reporting periods. Consequently, the decisions taken at the transition
date often continue to influence financial reporting long after the first Ind AS financial statements have been prepared.
Click here to read the detailed article on exceptions and exemptions
6. Understanding
the Deemed Cost Exemptions under
Ind AS 101
Deemed Cost is a transition relief provided under Ind AS 101 that helps companies adopt Ind AS for the first time without reconstructing historical cost records for old assets. Instead of recalculating the original cost and depreciation from the date of acquisition, entities can use an alternative value (called deemed cost) such as fair value, previous GAAP carrying amount, or an earlier revaluation. This significantly reduces the cost and complexity of transitioning to Ind AS while ensuring reliable financial reporting. The exemption is available for assets like Property, Plant & Equipment (PPE), Right-of-Use (ROU) Assets, Intangible Assets, Investment Property, Oil & Gas Assets, and Assets used in Rate-Regulated Activities.
For PPE, ROU Assets, Intangible Assets, and Investment Property, entities can choose fair value, previous revaluation, or previous GAAP carrying amount as deemed cost, depending on what is most practical. For specialised industries like oil & gas and rateregulated entities, Ind AS 101 allows the continuation of previous GAAP carrying amounts (after necessary impairment testing), recognising the difficulty of reconstructing historical records. Another important relief is event-driven fair value, where a fair value determined during events like an IPO, merger, or privatisation can be used as deemed cost, avoiding duplicate valuation exercises. In all cases, appropriate impairment testing and disclosures are required to maintain transparency during the transition.
Click here to read the detailed article on Deemed cost – Part I
Click here to read the detailed article on Deemed cost – Part II
7. Understanding the Transition of Various elements of
Financial Statements
During first-time adoption, different elements of the financial statements, such as assets, liabilities, equity, income, and expenses, may require adjustments to align with the new accounting framework. This transition ensures that financial statements present a true and fair view while improving comparability and transparency.
Ind AS 101 guides entities on how to recognise, derecognise, remeasure, and reclassify various financial statement elements while balancing compliance with practical feasibility. As a result, the transition process enables a smooth shift from previous GAAP to Ind AS without compromising the reliability and relevance of financial reporting. Let us understand the transition of some items of financial statements.
7.1. Transition of Share-based Payment Arrangements under Ind AS 101
Share-based payment arrangements, such as Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs), Share Appreciation Rights (SARs), and other equity-based compensation, often involve complex historical fair value calculations. To simplify the first-time adoption of Ind AS, Ind AS 101 provides transition relief by reducing the need to retrospectively value older share-based payment transactions. The objective is to balance practical feasibility with compliance under Ind AS 102, while ensuring transparent financial reporting.
The most important transition rule is based on the vesting status of the award. If an equity-settled award was granted and vested before the transition date, retrospective application of Ind AS 102 is optional. Similarly, cash-settled liabilities that were settled before transition and modifications or cancellations made before transition do not require retrospective accounting. However, awards that remain unvested on the transition date must be accounted for retrospectively, and the cumulative share-based payment expense should be recognised as if Ind AS 102 had always been applied. This ensures that ongoing employee compensation is measured consistently under Ind AS.
Entities are also required to provide adequate disclosures about the nature of sharebased payment arrangements, movement in share options, exercise prices, valuation assumptions, and the impact on profit or loss. These disclosures help users understand the effect of the transition and improve the transparency and comparability of financial statements. Overall, Ind AS 101 eases the transition by providing relief for historical transactions while ensuring that continuing share-based payment arrangements are accounted for in accordance with Ind AS 102.
Click here to read the detailed article on Share-based Payment Arrangements
7.2. Transition Relief for Cumulative Translation Differences
When an entity has foreign subsidiaries, branches, associates, or joint ventures, Ind AS 21 requires exchange differences arising from translating their financial statements to be recognised in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and accumulated as Cumulative Translation Differences (CTD). Reconstructing these historical translation differences at the time of first-time adoption of Ind AS can be extremely difficult because it requires old exchange rates and historical records. Therefore, Ind AS 101 provides an optional exemption allowing entities to reset the cumulative translation difference balance to zero on the transition date, instead of recalculating historical amounts.
Once this exemption is chosen, only exchange differences arising after the transition date are recognised and accumulated in equity. If a foreign operation is disposed of in the future, only post-transition translation differences are transferred to profit or loss, while pre-transition differences are ignored. The same relief is also available to subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures that adopt Ind AS after their parent, enabling them to use the carrying amounts already recognised in the parent’s consolidated financial statements and ensuring consistency across the group. Overall, this exemption significantly reduces implementation effort while maintaining compliance with Ind AS 21 for future periods.
Click here to read the detailed article on Cumulative Translation Differences
7.3. Transition Relief Long-term Foreign Currency Monetary Items
Under Ind AS 21, exchange differences on foreign currency monetary items (such as foreign currency loans) are generally recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss. However, under previous GAAP (AS 11), entities that had opted for Paragraphs 46/46A could defer these exchange differences by capitalising them or recording them in the Foreign Currency Monetary Item Translation Difference Account (FCMITDA). Reversing this historical treatment during transition would be complex and costly. Therefore, Paragraph D13AA of Ind AS 101 allows eligible first-time adopters to continue their previous GAAP accounting policy for qualifying long-term foreign currency monetary items existing before the transition date.
This relief applies only to foreign currency monetary items that existed immediately before the first Ind AS reporting period. Existing FCMITDA balances continue to be amortised under the previous GAAP policy, and there is no need to restate historical exchange differences or depreciation. However, any new foreign currency borrowings taken after the transition date must be accounted for strictly under Ind AS 21, with exchange gains or losses recognised immediately in profit or loss. Thus, the exemption provides continuity for old loans while ensuring that all future foreign currency transactions follow the Ind AS framework.
Click here to read the detailed article on Long-term Foreign Currency Monetary Items
7.4. Lease Accounting Transition under Ind AS 101
The transition to Ind AS 116, Leases can be challenging because it requires entities to recognise lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use (ROU) assets for most leases. Reconstructing historical lease information, discount rates, lease modifications, and other details from the commencement date of every lease can be costly and impractical. Therefore, Ind AS 101 provides several optional transition reliefs that allow entities to determine lease arrangements and measure lease-related balances based on the facts and circumstances existing on the transition date, making the adoption process much simpler.
The most important relief is for lessee accounting. Instead of recalculating lease accounting from the beginning of each lease, entities can recognise the lease liability at the present value of the remaining lease payments using the incremental borrowing rate on the transition date. The corresponding ROU asset can either be measured as if Ind AS 116 had always been applied or, more simply, at an amount equal to the lease liability (adjusted for prepaid or accrued lease payments). In addition, Ind AS 101 allows practical expedients such as using a single discount rate for similar leases, treating short-term and low-value leases under recognition exemptions, excluding initial direct costs, and using hindsight to determine lease terms. However, all recognised ROU assets must be tested for impairment on the transition date.
Click here to read the detailed article on Lease Accounting Transition under Ind AS 101
7.5. Transition Provision relating to Investments in Group Entities
Under Ind AS 27, investments in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures in separate financial statements can be measured either at cost or in accordance with Ind AS 109. Since determining historical cost retrospectively can be difficult, Ind AS 101 provides an optional deemed cost exemption, allowing entities to measure each investment at its original cost, fair value on the transition date, or the previous GAAP carrying amount. Using the previous GAAP carrying amount is the most common approach because it avoids reconstructing historical acquisition costs and simplifies the transition process. Appropriate disclosures regarding the measurement basis and transition adjustments are also required.
Ind AS 101 also addresses situations where a parent and its subsidiary adopt Ind AS on different dates. If the parent adopts first, the subsidiary may use the carrying amounts already recognised in the parent’s consolidated financial statements, provided no additional consolidation or business combination adjustments are required. Conversely, if the subsidiary adopts first, the parent can use the carrying amounts already recognised in the subsidiary’s Ind AS financial statements, subject to normal consolidation adjustments. These provisions eliminate duplicate transition efforts, ensure consistency across the group, and make the first-time adoption process more efficient.
Click here to read the detailed article on Transition Provision relating to Investments in Group Entities
7.6. Transition Provision relating to Joint Ventures
One of the most significant changes under Ind AS is the shift from proportionate consolidation (AS 27) to the equity method (Ind AS 28) for accounting of joint ventures. Instead of recognising a proportionate share of each asset, liability, income, and expense of the joint venture, entities now recognise a single investment balance, which is subsequently adjusted for the investor’s share of profits or losses, other comprehensive income, dividends, and impairment. To simplify this transition, Ind AS 101 allows the opening carrying amount of the investment to be determined using the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities previously recognised under proportionate consolidation, including any related goodwill.
After determining the opening investment, entities must perform mandatory impairment testing under Ind AS 36, recognise any related deferred tax effects, and appropriately account for negative net assets based on whether they have a legal or constructive obligation to absorb losses. Ind AS 101 also requires disclosures explaining how the individual assets and liabilities were aggregated into a single investment balance. These transition provisions reduce the complexity of moving to the equity method while ensuring transparent, consistent, and reliable financial reporting for joint ventures.
Click here to read the detailed article on Transition Provision relating to Joint Ventures
8. Conclusion
The transition to Ind AS is not merely an accounting exercise but a fundamental shift in the financial reporting framework. While Ind AS 101 is built on the principle of retrospective application, its carefully designed mandatory exceptions and optional exemptions ensure that entities can achieve a practical and cost-effective transition without compromising the quality, comparability, and transparency of financial statements. By understanding the transition principles and the reliefs available for different accounting areas, entities can prepare a robust Opening Ind AS Balance Sheet and establish a strong foundation for future financial reporting under Ind AS. Overall, a thorough understanding of these transition provisions enables first-time adopters to navigate the complexities of implementation efficiently while ensuring full compliance with the objectives of Ind AS 101.
About Us
Founded 1972
Evolution From a small family business to a leading technology-oriented Publishing/Product company
Expansion
Launch of Taxmann Advisory for personalized consulting solutions
Our Vision
Aim
Achieve perfection, skill, and accuracy in all endeavour
Growth
Evolution into a company with strong independent divisions: Research & Editorial, Production, Sales & Marketing, and Technology
Future
Continuously providing practical solutions through Taxmann Advisory
Our Strength
Core
Editorial and Research Division
Team
Over 200 motivated legal professionals (Lawyers, Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries)
Expertise
Monitoring and processing developments in judicial, administrative, and legislative fields with unparalleled skill and accuracy
Impact
Helping businesses navigate complex tax and regulatory requirements with ease
Taxmann Today
Legacy Innovation Commitment
Over 60 years of domain knowledge and trust
Technology-driven solutions for modern challenges
Ensuring perfection, skill, and accuracy in every solution provided
Our Core Domain Areas
Income Tax
Corporate Tax Advisory
Trusts & NGO Consultancy
TDS Advisory
Global Mobility Services
Personal Taxation
Training
Due Diligence
Foreign Exchange Management Laws
Due Dilligence
Advisory Services
Assistance in compounding of offences
Transactions Services
Investment outside India
Your Partners for Frictionless Advice
Goods
Transaction Advisory
Business Restructuring
Classification
Due Diligence
Training
Advisory
Trade Facilitation Measures
Corporate
Corporate Structuring
VAT Advisory
Residential Status
A Glimpse of the People Behind Taxmann
Naveen Wadhwa Research and Advisory [Corporate and Personal Tax]
Chartered Accountant (All India 24th Rank)
14+ years of experience in Income tax and International Tax
Expertise across real estate, technology, publication, education, hospitality, and manufacturing sectors
Contributor to renowned media outlets on tax issues
Vinod K. Singhania
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory (Direct Tax)
Over 35 years of experience in tax laws
PhD in Corporate Economics and Legislation
Author and resource person in 800+ seminars
V.S. Datey
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax]
Holds 30+ years of experience
Engaged in consulting and training professionals on Indirect Taxation
A regular speaker at various industry forums, associations and industry workshops
Author of various books on Indirect Taxation used by professionals and Department officials
S.S. Gupta
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax]
Chartered Accountant and Cost & Works Accountant
34+ Years of Experience in Indirect Taxation
Bestowed with numerous prestigious scholarships and prizes
Author of the book GST – How to Meet Your Obligations', which is widely referred to by Trade and Industry
Manoj Fogla
Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Charitable Trusts and NGOs]
Over three decades of practising experience on tax, legal and regulatory aspects of NPOs and Charitable Institutions
Law practitioner, a fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and also holds a Master's degree in Philosophy
PhD from Utkal University, Doctoral Research on Social Accountability Standards for NPOs
Author of several best-selling books for professionals, including the recent one titled 'Trust and NGO's Ready Reckoner' by Taxmann
Drafted publications for The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, such as FAQs on GST for NPOs & FAQs on FCRA for NPOs.
Has been a faculty and resource person at various national and international forums
the UAE
Chartered Accountant (All India 36th Rank)
Has previously worked with the KPMG
Contact Us
Taxmann Delhi
59/32, New Rohtak Road
New Delhi – 110005 | India
Phone | 011 45562222
Email | sales@taxmann.com
Taxmann Mumbai
35, Bodke Building, Ground Floor, M.G. Road, Mulund (West), Opp. Mulund Railway Station Mumbai – 400080 | Maharashtra | India
Phone | +91 93222 47686
Email | sales.mumbai@taxmann.com
Taxmann Pune
Office No. 14, First Floor, Prestige Point, 283 Shukrwar Peth, Bajirao Road, Opp. Chinchechi Talim, Pune – 411002 | Maharashtra | India
Phone | +91 98224 11811
Email | sales.pune@taxmann.com
Taxmann Ahmedabad
7, Abhinav Arcade, Ground Floor, Pritam Nagar Paldi
Ahmedabad – 380007 | Gujarat | India
Phone: +91 99099 84900
Email: sales.ahmedabad@taxmann.com
Taxmann Hyderabad
4-1-369 Indralok Commercial Complex Shop No. 15/1 – Ground Floor, Reddy Hostel Lane Abids Hyderabad – 500001 | Telangana | India
Phone | +91 93910 41461
Email | sales.hyderabad@taxmann.com
Taxmann Chennai No. 26, 2, Rajan St, Rama Kamath Puram, T. Nagar
Chennai – 600017 | Tamil Nadu | India
Phone | +91 89390 09948
Email | sales.chennai@taxmann.com
www.taxmann.com
Taxmann Bengaluru
12/1, Nirmal Nivas, Ground Floor, 4th Cross, Gandhi Nagar
Bengaluru – 560009 | Karnataka | India
Phone | +91 99869 50066
Email | sales.bengaluru@taxmann.com
Taxmann Kolkata Nigam Centre, 155-Lenin Sarani, Wellington, 2nd Floor, Room No. 213
Kolkata – 700013 | West Bengal | India
Phone | +91 98300 71313
Email | sales.kolkata@taxmann.com
Taxmann Lucknow
House No. LIG – 4/40, Sector – H, Jankipuram Lucknow – 226021 | Uttar Pradesh | India
Phone | +91 97924 23987
Email | sales.lucknow@taxmann.com
Taxmann Bhubaneswar
Plot No. 591, Nayapalli, Near Damayanti Apartments
Bhubaneswar – 751012 | Odisha | India
Phone | +91 99370 71353
Email | sales.bhubaneswar@taxmann.com
Taxmann Guwahati
House No. 2, Samnaay Path, Sawauchi Dakshin Gaon Road
Guwahati – 781040 | Assam | India
Phone | +91 70866 24504
Email | sales.guwahati@taxmann.com