TCCI Tasmania Report

Tasmania Report 2018

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

1

CONTENTS FROM THE CHAIR

3

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

4

TIME TO TURN IT AROUND TASCOSS CEO

5

CHAPTER 1 TASMANIA’S ECONOMY

7

CHAPTER 2 TASMANIA’S LABOUR MARKET

27

CHAPTER 3 TASMANIA’S RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MARKET

37

CHAPTER 4 TASMANIA’S POPULATION AND SOCIETY

45

CHAPTER 5 TASMANIA’S EDUCATION SYSTEM

53

CHAPTER 6 TASMANIA’S PUBLIC SECTOR

69

CHAPTER 7 TASMANIA’S LONG-TERM ECONOMIC CHALLENGE

83

CHAPTER 8 LOOKING FORWARD

93

EVENT PARTNERS

2

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

FROM THE CHAIR S U S A N PA R R

It is with great pleasure and pride that I

Tasmanians to unproductive lives with compromised

introduce this fourth Tasmania Report to you.

opportunities for employment, personal fulfilment and

It is remarkable both in the quality of the data,

community engagement. The flow on affects mean increasing health costs, more people who feel alienated

the analysis and the themes identified by

from society, and who in turn have no stake in developing

Saul Eslake, as well as the unique partnership

their communities.

that makes the funding of the report possible.

State Orange Book 2018 produced by the Grattan Institute

TasCOSS, Federal Group, Bank of Us, St.LukesHealth and the Mercury combine

highlights a stunning statistic: Avoidable mortality rates in Tasmania are the worst in the country. Avoidable mortality rates are defined as deaths from conditions that are

in partnership to provide all of us with key

potentially preventable and/or treatable through existing

data that continues to disrupt conventional

primary or hospital care. This is in an environment where

attitudes around likely partnerships formed for the benefit of all Tasmanians.

health spending is the largest single component of state expenditure and is growing rapidly.

The TCCI believes that the true measure of a successful

As engaged Tasmanian leaders, you know the significance

Tasmania must include improved achievements in these

of accurate data in measuring and managing key objectives

areas as well as in employment, infrastructure, levels of

and the benefit of positive relationships with stakeholders

taxation and the costs of doing business in an island

who join with us in striving to achieve a better Tasmania

state with a relatively static population and limited

for all and who recognise that prosperity and wellbeing are

transport options.

intrinsically linked at an individual and community level. It is gratifying to note that many organisations like Tasplan are now using the Tasmania Report in their planning.

The use of economic indicators alone can cloud vision and judgement. The juxtaposition of social and economic indicators informs a fuller appreciation of the whole picture of the Tasmanian community and prompts debate about the priorities that Tasmania must set. Of course, State

The importance of long term planning and having measurable targets is key to restoring confidence in institutions and improving community engagement.

The TCCI envisages Tasmania as the most successful state in the Commonwealth. The measures of that success include prosperity but depend on education standards and good health and confidence in our institutions.

Government plays a huge part in the achievement of

TCCI will continue to track Tasmania’s progress towards

community priorities, but Local Government, health and

the attainment of improved results in jobs, construction,

education institutions, industry, businesses large and small,

exports, new businesses, housing, health status and

community groups, households and individuals have a

educational attainment.

responsibility to look beyond self-interest and professional

I commend the fourth Tasmania Report to you all.

empires to understand and act for the needs of Tasmania as a whole.

Tasmanians are the unhealthiest, oldest, worst educated, most under-employed and most dependent on

Susan Parr Chair Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Government benefits in Australia. This is not sustainable and if it continues will condemn a large number of

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

3

ABOUT THE AUTHOR SAUL ESLAKE

Saul Eslake worked as an economist in the Australian

Saul has a first class honours degree in

financial markets for more than 25 years, including as

Economics from the University of Tasmania,

Chief Economist at McIntosh Securities (a stockbroking firm) in the late 1980s, Chief Economist (International) at

and a Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance

National Mutual Funds Management in the early 1990s, as

and Investment from the Securities Institute of

Chief Economist at the Australia & New Zealand Banking

Australia. In December 2012 he was awarded

Group (ANZ) from 1995 to 2009, and as Chief Economist (Australia & New Zealand) for Bank of America Merrill Lynch from 2011 until June 2015.

University of Tasmania. He has also completed

He has now established his own independent economics

the Senior Executive Program at Columbia

consultancy business, based in Tasmania, and also has a

University’s Graduate School of Business in

part-time appointment as a Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow at

New York.

the University of Tasmania.

Saul is on the Board of Housing Choices Australia Ltd, a not-for-profit provider of affordable rental housing in three states, including Tasmania; and is Chair of the Board of Ten Days on the Island, Tasmania’s biennial multi-arts festival. He is also on the Macquarie Point Development Corporation board.

4

an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree by the

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

The potential of one-quarter of our people to participate in the social and economic opportunities our state offers

TIME TO TURN IT AROUND

and to live a good life is denied them by barriers that are not of their making. Turning that around would be a game-changer for the future of our state.

Inequality is one of the wicked problems. It can feel too

TA S C O S S C E O

big and too hard to change. But we can and we already

It is an exciting time for Tasmania. Our economy is

are taking the steps to make a difference. Community led.

growing, visitors are coming to the State in record

They are turning it around.

numbers, more of our young people are participating in school, and billions of dollars will be invested in jobcreating projects over the next 10 years. Now is the time of opportunity including to make sure that the growth is sustainable, and that more people can prosper. We need to unlock the potential that is dormant in our communities. We need a game-changer strategy.

are. In communities throughout Tasmania local residents

In the partnership between TasCOSS, the TCCI and the State Government we are working to turn it around. In the Derwent Valley, the South-East, the Break O’Day municipality and now the West Coast, community members are coming together to find ways to get local people into local jobs. They are asking people what their hopes are, what the challenges are, and what

Our people are our greatest asset. As any successful

the solutions could be. And, with funding from the

business person will tell you, no matter how much you

State Government, they are trying different ways of

invest in your business, in its infrastructure, its equipment,

doing things, connecting job seekers with employers

the latest technology, a business will not be profitable or

and building on the resources and strong connections

sustainable if you don’t equally invest in your people. That’s

within their communities. They know that the problems

why large organisations prioritise managers of “people and

are not the fault of individuals and so we must share

culture” - because people are the most important part of

the responsibility, together as a community, and as

any business. They are critical to its success.

Tasmanians.

Tasmania is no different. When you map investment in

This work is a strategic investment by the State

Tasmania from the three tiers of government it is strong

Government in people. And we need a lot more of it.

in infrastructure – in irrigation, in tourism, in roads and in

Just like strategic investment in irrigation has led to an

energy projects. And when you look at a map of Tasmania

expansion of our agriculture sector, so we must now

you can also see the vast World Heritage Area -- one-fifth

make a significant strategic investment in our people so

of our island protected for future generations. What you

everyone has the opportunity to participate fully in life on

can’t see on that map is the one-quarter of Tasmania that

our amazing island.

is locked up because of a lack of investment in our people.

That must change.

Around 120,000 Tasmanians do not have the opportunity to live a good life. They try to live on less than $433 a week while finding the resources to look after their family, and to look for work. They have to make choices that many of us aren’t forced to make – for example, to move out of major population centres due to a lack of affordable housing. They are faced with other barriers beyond their control like a lack of access to reliable, affordable transport that can get them to services, training and work.

They experience cultural barriers like prejudice, stigma and

It’s time to shine the spotlight on investment in our people – our soft infrastructure – investment that matches and exceeds our investment in hard infrastructure.

We have been here before. We have seen strong economic times. But we haven’t tackled the deep disadvantage that has excluded many in our population from participating and therefore sustaining our economic growth. To quote Santayana, “those who do not learn from the past are condemned to repeat it”. We must not condemn another generation of Tasmanians to being locked out of the opportunities ahead.

exclusion. And they face very personal barriers with low

Kym Goodes

levels of literacy, dental problems and poor physical and

CEO

mental health.

Tasmanian Council of Social Service

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

5

6

Chapter 1 TASMANIA’S ECONOMY

7

TASMANIA’S OVERALL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN 2017-18 As discussed in more detail in Chapter 4, Tasmania’s Chapter 1: Tasmania’s economy improved economic performance has prompted a turn-

Tasmania’s economy is on a roll. Overall economic activity – as measured by chain-volume or ‘real’ gross state product

around in the movement of people across Bass Strait – Tasmania’s overall economic performance in 2017-18 since 2015, more people have moved from the mainland to years (Chart 1.1), and a substantial improvement on the (GSP)1 – grew by 3.3% in 2017-18, the fastest pace in ten

average growth rate over the preceding five just Tasmania’s economy is on ayears roll.ofOverall

Tasmania activity than in the–opposite direction – and increase in economic as measured by an chainthe number of overseas migrants settling in Tasmania, which volume or ‘real’ gross state product (GSP)1 – grew by 3.3% in 2017-18, the fastest together have more than offset the ongoing decline in the fourth time in the past 25 years, Tasmania’s economy grew pace in ten years (Chart 1.1), and a substantial improvement on the average ‘natural’ rate of Tasmania’s population growth (births minus at a faster pace than that of Australia as a whole. Among growth rate over the preceding five years of just 1.0% per annum. For the first time in deaths). As a result, Tasmania’s population is now growing the other states and territories only the ACT and (by much nine years, and only the fourth time in the past 25 years, Tasmania’s economy grew at its fastest rate in nine years – something which, all else smaller margins) Victoria and Queensland recorded faster at a faster pace than that of Australia as a whole.

Among the other states and being equal, contributes to faster economic growth as well economic growth rates than Tasmania in 2017-18 (Chart 1.2). territories on the ACT and (by much smaller margins) Victoria and Queensland as being partly a consequence of it. recorded faster economic growth rates than Tasmania in 2017-18 (Chart 1.2).

1.0% per annum. For the first time in nine years, and only the

Chart 1.1: Growth in real gross state product, Tasmania and mainland, 1999-00 to 2017-18 6

% change from previous year

5

4.5 4.0

Mainland

4

3.5

3

3.0

2

National average

2.5

1

2.0

Tasmania

0

1.5 1.0

-1 -2

Chart 1.2: Growth in real gross state product, states and territories, 2017-18 5.0 % change from previous year

0.5 00

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

Financial years ended 30 June

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

16

18

0.0

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

As discussed in more detail in Chapter 4, Tasmania’s improved economic performance has prompted a turn-around in the movement of people across Bass Strait – since 2015, more people have moved from the mainland to Tasmania than in the opposite direction – and an increase in the number of overseas migrants settling in Tasmania, which together have more than offset the ongoing decline in the ‘natural’ rate of Tasmania’s population growth (births minus deaths). As a result, Tasmania’s population is now growing at its fastest rate in nine years – something which, all else being equal, contributes to faster economic growth as well as being For a more detailed explanation of what GSP measures and how it is derived, see ABS, Australian System of National Accounts: Concepts, Sources a consequence of468-523, it. and partly Methods, 2015 (5216.0), Chapter 21, pp. or the explanatory notes to ABS, Australian National Accounts: State Accounts 2017-

1

18(5220.0). The Tasmanian Treasury continues to harbour significant reservations about the ‘reliability and volatility’ of ABS estimates of GSP and other key data for Tasmania (see Tasmanian Government, Budget Paper No. 1, June 2018, p. 24). Nonetheless, the ABS data provide the only basis for analysing the performance of the Tasmanian economy over time, and for making comparisons between Tasmania’s economic performance and that of other states and territories, and hence are used throughout this Report.

a more detailed explanation of what GSP measures and how it is derived, see ABS, Australian System of National Accounts: Concepts, Sources and Methods, 2015 (5216.0), Chapter 21, pp. 468-523, or the explanatory notes to ABS, Australian National Accounts: State Accounts 2017-18(5220.0). The Tasmanian Treasury continues to harbour significant reservations about the ‘reliability and volatility’ of T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 ABS estimates of GSP and other key data for Tasmania (see Tasmanian Government, Budget Paper No. 1, June 2018, p. 24). Nonetheless, the ABS data provide the only basis for analysing the performance of 1 For

8

2

It’s therefore especially noteworthy that, after abstracting from the impact of this faster rate of population growth, Tasmania’s per capita economic growth rate of 2.3% in 2017-18 was faster than that of any other State or Territory (Chart 1.3) – for the TASMANIA’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN 2017-18 (CONTINUED) first time since the ECONOMIC current series of state estimates of economic growth began in 1989-90 – as well as being the most rapid since 2008-09 (Chart 1.4).

Chart 1.3: Growth in real per capita GSP, states and territories, 2017-18 2.5 % change from previous year

5

3 National average

Tasmania

2 1

1.0

Mainland

0 -1

0.5

-2 0.0

% change from previous year

4

2.0 1.5

Chart 1.4: Growth in real per capita GSP, Tasmania and mainland, 1999-00 to 2017-18

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

00

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

16

18

Financial years ended 30 June Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

Nonetheless, level of Tasmania’s per It’s therefore especiallythe noteworthy that, after abstracting

capita gross product 2017-18perwas stillgross Nonetheless, the level ofin Tasmania’s capita in 2017-18 was$16,400 still lower than of any other from the impact of that this faster rate ofother population growth, lower than of any state or territory,product and more than (or that 21.2%) state or and more than ‘performance $15,800 (or 21.2%) below Tasmania’s capita economic growth rateThis of 2.3% in indication belowper the national average. is an ofterritory, the longer-term theof national average.

This is an indication of the longer2017-18 wasbetween faster than that of any other economy state or territory gap’ Tasmania’s and that the rest of Australia − which is in term ‘performance gap’ between Tasmania’s economy and (Chart 1.3) – for the first time since the current series of state turn the principal reason why Tasmanians’ material living standards are, on average, that of the rest of Australia − which is in turn the principal estimates of economic growth began in 1989-90 – as well significantly lower than those of other Australians.

Narrowing this ‘performance gap’ reason why Tasmanians’ material living standards are, on as being the most rapid since 2008-09 (Chart 1.4). requires a sustained period of faster growth in Tasmanian per capita gross product average, significantly lower than those of other Australians. than in the rest of Australia. Chapter 7 explores in greater detail what is required to Narrowing this ‘performance gap’ requires a sustained period achieve that. of faster growth in Tasmanian per capita gross product than in the rest of Australia. Chapter 7 explores in greater detail

Performance of key sectors of Tasmania’s economy in 2017-18 what is required to achieve that.

The industry detail of the ABS State Accounts (see Chart 1.5 below) suggests that 60% of the growth in Tasmania’s economy in 2017-18 came from five sectors: •

20% of the increase in Tasmania’s gross state product was attributable to a 5.6% increase in value added in the health care and social assistance sector, which since the early years of this century has been the largest single sector of the Tasmanian economy, accounting for 12% of gross state product in 2017-18;

•

manufacturing accounted for 12% of the growth in Tasmania’s GSP in 2017-18, with its value-added increasing by 6.5%, following declines in the previous two (and four of the previous five) years. The upturn in Tasmanian manufacturing in 2017-18 was led by the food and beverages sector;

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

9

PERFORMANCE OF KEY SECTORS OF TASMANIA’S ECONOMY IN 2017-18 3

Chart 1.5: Real change in gross value added by industry, Tasmania, 2017-18 Agriculture, forestry & fishing Mining Manufacturing Electricity, gas & water Construction Wholesale trade Retail trade Accommodation & food services Transport, postal & warehousing Information, media & telcoms services Financial & insurance services Rental, hiring & real estate services Professional, scientific & technical services Administration & support services Public administration & safety Education & training Health care & social assistance Art & recreation services Other services

% change -2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

The • industry detail of the ABS Accounts (see Chartby value-added inState mining increased 1.5 above) suggests that contributed 60% of the growth in Tasmania’s years, and just over 10% economy in 2017-18 came from five sectors:

professional, and technical services 8.8% • inthe2017-18, thescientific first increase in four sector’s value-added increased by 10.2% in 2017-18, of the increase in Tasmania’s GSP;

its biggest increase in 13 years, contributing over 8½%

construction industry value-added increased byincrease 5.0% in 2017-18,GSP following two of the in Tasmania’s (despite this sector representing only 3% of the economy).

The strong years of decline, contributing almost 9% of the increase in Tasmania’s total GSP; was attributable to a 5.6% increase in value added in the growth in this sector was in part a by-product of growth and health care and social assistance sector, which since •

• 20% of the increase in Tasmania’s gross state product

the early years of this century has been the largest single

in other sectors to which it provides services, including

the professional, scientific and technical services sector’s value-added construction, mining and manufacturing. sector of the Tasmanian economy, accounting for 12% of increased by 10.2% in 2017-18, its biggest increase in 13 years, contributing over Other sectors recording strong growth in value-added in gross state product in 2017-18; 8½% of the increase in Tasmania’s GSP (despite this sector representing only 3% 2017-18 were administration and support services (7.4%), • manufacturing accounted for 12% of strong the growth of the economy).

The growth in this sector was in part a by-product of accommodation and food services (5.8%), and rental, in Tasmania’s GSP in 2017-18, with its value-added growth in other sectors to which it provides services, including construction, hiring and real estate services (4.3%). increasing by 6.5%, following declines in the previous mining and manufacturing.

•

two (and four of the previous five) years. The upturn in

Agriculture, forestry and fishing, which is the second-

largest sector of after health care and value-added inTasmania’s 2017-18economy were administration social assistance, recorded growth in value-added of only and beverages sector; and support services (7.4%), accommodation and food services (5.8%), and rental, 0.7% in 2017-18, following three years of much stronger hiring and real estate services • value-added in mining increased by 8.8% in(4.3%).

2017-18, the Tasmanian manufacturing in 2017-18 was ledgrowth by the food Other sectors recording strong in

first increase in four years, and contributed just over 10%

growth averaging almost 5½% per annum. This appears to

Agriculture, forestry and fishing, which is the have second-largest sector been at least partly due toof theTasmania’s impact of dry conditions of the increase in Tasmania’s GSP; economy after health care and social assistance, recorded growth in value-added on Tasmania’s east coast.

Nonetheless, Tasmania was the • construction industry value-added increased by 5.0% state or territory (apart from Queensland) where valueof only 0.7% in 2017-18, following three years only of much stronger growth averaging inalmost 2017-18, following twoannum. years of decline, contributingto have added in agriculture at alldue in 2017-18: for Australia 5½% per This appears been at leastgrew partly to the impactas a almost 9% of the increase in Tasmania’s total GSP; and whole, value-added in agriculture fell by 5.1%. of dry conditions on Tasmania’s east coast. Nonetheless, Tasmania was the only state or territory (apart from Queensland) where value-added in agriculture grew at all in 2017-18: for Australia as a whole, value-added in agriculture fell by 5.1%.

10

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the sectoral composition of Tasmania’s in Chart 1.5 above is that only one sector – wholesale trade – recorded a decline in value-added during the past financial year.

TCC I TA S M Agrowth N I A R Ein PO R T 2 0depicted 18 economic 2017-18

PERFORMANCE OF KEY SECTORS OF TASMANIA’S ECONOMY IN 2017-18 (CONTINUED) 4

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the sectoral

This is the first time in 27 years that economic growth in

composition of Tasmania’s economic growth in 2017-18

Tasmania has been so broadly-based (Chart 1.6). Since the

depicted in Chart 1.5 above is that only one sector –

ABS commenced the current series of estimates of gross

This is the first time in 27 years that economic growth in Tasmania has been so state product in 1989-90, on average six of the 19 sectors wholesale trade – recorded a decline in value-added during broadly-based (Chart 1.6). Since the ABS commenced the current series of estimates which make up the Tasmanian economy have experienced the past financial year. of gross state product in 1989-90, on averagedeclines six ofinthe 19 sectors which make up the value-added in any given year. In 2011-12 and Tasmanian economy have experienced declines value-added in any given year.

2012-13,in 11 sectors reported declines in gross value added.

In 2011-12 and 2012-13, 11 sectors reported declines in gross value added.

Chart 1.6: Number of Tasmanian industry sectors recording positive growth in value-added 6 % change Number No. of sectors 18 reporting positive growth 5 16 in value-added right scale) 14 4 12 3 10 2

8 6

1

4

0 -1

Real gross state product (left scale) 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Financial years ended 30 June

2 0

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

Household consumption, business investment and public spending Another illustration of the breadth of the upswing in Tasmania’s economy in 2017-18 is that all of the major identified expenditure components of gross state product recorded positive growth (Chart 1.7). This is the first time that this has occurred in Tasmania since the current series of ABS State Accounts commenced in 1989-90.

Household consumption spending grew by 2.9% in real terms in 2017-18, a significant improvement on the 0.6% growth recorded in 2016-17 (and which had previously been reported as a 0.6% decline), and in line with the national average. Household spending on food increased by 6.7% in real terms, the largest increase in nine years; other categories recording strong growth in spending were electricity, gas and other fuel, up 5.6%; communications, up 4.8% (though this was the smallest increase in spending on this category since 2012-13); recreation and culture, also up 4.8%; and hotels, cafes and restaurants, up 4.8%.

As was the case in 2016-17, ‘net expenditure interstate’ (that is, the difference between what Tasmanians spend interstate and what mainlanders spend in Tasmania) detracted from total measured household spending (by 0.5 pc points). At C C I TA SMAN A R number E P O R T of 2018 face value this appears difficult to reconcile with the Tstrong growth inI the interstate visitors to Tasmania, but may reflect similarly strong growth in spending by

11

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, BUSINESS INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC SPENDING Another illustration of the breadth of the upswing in

As was the case in 2016-17, ‘net expenditure interstate’ (that

Tasmania’s economy in 2017-18 is that all of the major

is, the difference between what Tasmanians spend interstate

identified expenditure components of gross state product

and what mainlanders spend in Tasmania) detracted from

recorded positive growth (Chart 1.7). This is the first time that

total measured household spending (by 0.5 pc points). At

this has occurred in Tasmania since the current series of ABS

face value this appears difficult to reconcile with the strong

State Accounts commenced in 1989-90.

growth in the number of interstate visitors to Tasmania, but may reflect similarly strong growth in spending by Tasmanians

Household consumption spending grew by 2.9% in real

on visits to the mainland (or, perhaps, on goods and services

terms in 2017-18, a significant improvement on the 0.6%

ordered from mainland outlets, including online).

growth recorded in 2016-17 (and which had previously been reported as a 0.6% decline), and in line with the national

The pick-up in Tasmanian household spending growth in

average. Household spending on food increased by 6.7% in

2017-18 is at least partly attributable to faster growth in real

real terms, the largest increase in nine years; other categories

household disposable income, which grew by 2.3% in 2017-

recording strong growth in spending were electricity, gas and

18, up from 0.4% in 2016-17, and compared with an average

other fuel, up 5.6%; communications, up 4.8% (though this

of 1.5% in mainland states and territories. As discussed

was the smallest increase in spending on this category since

in Chapter 2, employment grew slightly more rapidly in

2012-13); recreation and culture, also up 4.8%; and hotels,

Tasmania than on the mainland in 2017-18, while wages

cafes and restaurants, up 4.8%.

growth hasn’t slowed as much in Tasmania in recent years 5 as it has on the mainland.

Chart 1.7: Growth in major expenditure components of gross state product, 2017-18 18

% change

16

Tasmania

14

Mainland

12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2

Household consumption

Housing investment

Business investment

Public spending

Net international exports*

Other*

Note: Figures shown for net international exports and ‘other’ are percentage point contributions to the change in real GSP. ‘Other’ (conceptually) includes net interstate exports, and changes in business inventories, although these are not measured directly. Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

12

The pick-up in Tasmanian household spending growth in 2017-18 is at least partly attributable to faster growth in real household disposable income, which grew by 2.3% in 2017-18, up from 0.4% in 2016-17, and compared with an average of 1.5% in mainland states and territories. As discussed in Chapter 2, employment grew slightly more rapidly in Tasmania than on the mainland in 2017-18, while wages growth hasn’t slowed as much in Tasmania in recent years as it has on the mainland.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Housing investment in Tasmania grew by 5.1% in real terms in 2017-18, rebounding

6

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, BUSINESS INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC SPENDING (CONTINUED)

Chart 1.8: Mortgage finance commitments to first home buyers, Tasmania 3.5

000 per month (12-mth moving average)

Chart 1.9: Residential building approvals and commencements, Tasmania 4.0 '000s (annual rate) Approvals

3.0

3.5

2.5

3.0

2.0

2.5

1.5

2.0

1.0

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Housing Finance (5609.0), September 2018.

1.5

Commencements

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Building Activity (8752.0), June quarter 2018.

New business investment expenditure increased by 16.0% in real terms in Tasmania in The time-lag between approvals being granted by local 2017-18, the largest increase in ten years, and almost double the growth rate of governments and work commencing which was apparent in 2017-18, rebounding from a decline of almost 18% in 2016business investment on the mainland. The level of business investment in 2017-18 was during 2017 appears to have narrowed since then (Chart 1.9), 17 (and a decline of 5% in 2015-16). Most other states and higher than in any year since 2018-19, whichalthough attestsanecdotal to the high level of business evidence from builders suggests that territories, apart from South Australia and New South Wales, confidence in Tasmania in recent years. many are continuing to experience difficulty finding sufficient recorded small declines in housing investment in 2017-18.

Housing investment in Tasmania grew by 5.1% in real terms

The As pick-up in housing activity1.10, is in response to the shown in Chart the largest

numbers of skilled workers (partly because of the strong

contributor to the increase in business investment demand from commercial construction projects). increase in ‘underlying’ housing demand prompted by the in 2017-18 was expenditure on equipment and machinery, which rose by almost 42% New business investment expenditure increased by acceleration in population growth referred to earlier (and in real terms. This category is inherently ‘lumpy’, and the increase in 2017-18 was 16.0% in real terms in Tasmania in 2017-18, the largest discussed in more detail in Chapter 4); and an apparent probably partly due to some large purchases of a one-off nature. increased willingness on the part of existing Tasmanian

increase in ten years, and almost double the growth rate

of business investment on the mainland. The level of Chart 1.10: Business investment in Tasmania, by major category, 2006-07 to 2017-18

residents to ‘trade up’ to new homes, prompted by recent

increases in the value of established homes (as discussed in

business investment in 2017-18 was higher than in any year

2016-173).$bn more detail in Chapter

since 2008-09, which attests to the high level of business

3.5 to first home buyers would appear to have Cash grants

confidence in Tasmania in recent years.

made only a marginal difference to the level of housing

As shown in Chart 1.10, the largest contributor to the increase

activity: the number of housing loans to Tasmania first-

Intellectual in business investment in 2017-18 was expenditure on

4.0

3.0

2.5 in 2017-18 was, at just over 1,700, less than home buyers

Biological resources

property equipment and machinery, which rose by almost 42%

2.0

in real terms. This category is inherently ‘lumpy’, and the

1.5

purchases of a one-off nature.

7% higher than in 2016-17, and no higher than it had been in 2014-15 (Chart 1.8).

Engineering increase in 2017-18 was probably partly due to some large construction

1.0

Non-residential building

0.5 0.0

07

08

09

10

11 12 13 14 15 Financial years ended 30 June

16

17

18

Equipment & machinery

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 Note: Figures exclude purchases of second-hand assets from the public sector.

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

13

New business investment expenditure increased by 16.0% in real terms in Tasmania in 2017-18, the largest increase in ten years, and almost double the growth rate of business investment on the mainland. The level of business investment in 2017-18 was higher than in any year since 2018-19, which attests to the high level of business confidence in Tasmania in recent years.

As shown in Chart 1.10, the largest contributor to the increase in business investment in 2017-18 was expenditure on equipment and machinery, which rose by almost 42% in real terms. This category is inherently ‘lumpy’, and the increase in 2017-18 was HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, BUSINESS INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC SPENDING (CONTINUED) probably partly due to some large purchases of a one-off nature.

Chart 1.10: Business investment in Tasmania, by major category, 2006-07 to 2017-18 4.0

2016-17 $bn

Biological resources

3.5 7

3.0

Intellectual property

2.5

Engineering construction expenditure rose by almost 20% in real terms in 2017-18, to 2.0 the largest contributors were work done on water supply, sewerage and which Engineering construction drainage (which increased more than threefold in 2017-18); electricity generation 1.5 and transmission; and heavy industry; partly offset by a large decline in 1.0 Non-residential telecommunications infrastructure investment. Engineering construction work done building by 0.5 the private sector for the public sector also declined in 2017-18, although the amount of work still to be done on existing projects remains at a high levelEquipment by & 0.0 historical standards. machinery 07

08

09

10

11 12 13 14 15 Financial years ended 30 June expenditure declined by 15%

16

17

18

Non-residential building in real terms in 2017-18 , Note: Figures exclude purchases of second-hand assets from thenumber public sector. largely reflecting the completion of work on a of hotels and educational Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18. buildings, partly offset by an increase in the amount of work done on office projects (Chart 1.11).

Chart 1.11: Private non-residential building work done, by type, Tasmania 450

$bn (current prices)

Other

400 350

Education buildings

300

Aged care facilities

250 200

Factories & warehouses

150

Shops

100

Offices

50 0

Hotels, etc 11

12

13 14 15 16 Financial years ended 30 June

17

18

Note: Figures exclude purchases of second-hand assets from the public sector.

Source: ABS, Building Activity(8752.0), June quarter 2018.

14

Public sector expenditure2 in Tasmania increased by 3.0% in real terms in 2017-18, the smallest increase since 2014-15, and less than the 4.4% increased recorded by mainland states and territories, on average (which was however the first increase in five years). Government consumption spending (which consists largely of wages and salaries of government employees) increased by 3.1%, while public sector investment (including that of government business enterprises) rose by 2.5% (after a 10.2% increase in 2016-17).

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

The value of engineering construction work undertaken by or for public sector

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, BUSINESS INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC SPENDING (CONTINUED) Engineering construction expenditure rose by almost 20%

Public sector expenditure2 in Tasmania increased by 3.0%

in real terms in 2017-18, to which the largest contributors

in real terms in 2017-18, the smallest increase since 2014-

were work done on water supply, sewerage and drainage

15, and less than the 4.4% increased recorded by mainland

(which increased more than threefold in 2017-18);

states and territories, on average (which was however

electricity generation and transmission; and heavy industry;

the first increase in five years). Government consumption

partly offset by a large decline in telecommunications

spending (which consists largely of wages and salaries of

infrastructure investment. Engineering construction work

government employees) increased by 3.1%, while public

done by the private sector for the public sector also declined

sector investment (including that of government business

in 2017-18, although the amount of work still to be done

enterprises) rose by 2.5% (after a 10.2% increase in 2016-17).

on existing projects remains at a high level by historical

The value of engineering construction work undertaken

standards.

by or for public sector agencies in Tasmania fell by 15%

Non-residential building expenditure declined by 15% in

in 2017-18, largely because of an 84% decline in work

real terms in 2017-18, largely reflecting the completion of

on telecommunications infrastructure, as the NBN

work on a number of hotels and educational buildings, partly

roll-out in Tasmania neared its completion. Excluding

offset by an increase in the amount of work done on office

telecommunications, the value of public sector engineering

projects (Chart 1.11).

work done rose by 9% in 2017-18, to a record high of over 8

$770bn (Chart 1.12).

Chart 1.12: Engineering construction work done for the public sector, by type, Tasmania 1,000

$bn

Other

900

Recreation

800 700

Water, sewerage & drainage Electricity assets

600 500 400

Bridges, railways & harbours Roads, etc

300 200 100 0

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Telecommunications

Financial years ended 30 June Note: Figures include work done by the private sector under contract to public sector agencies Source: ABS, Engineering Construction (8762.0), June quarter 2018.

Tasmania’s trade According to the ABS State Accounts, Tasmania’s net international trade contributed 1.6 percentage points to the growth in Tasmania’s gross state product in Note that ‘public in this context purchases goods and services by all levels of government (Federal, state and local), 2017-18 – sector thatexpenditure’ is, almost half of means it – with theofvolume of international exports of goods and excludes cash payments to individuals, subsidies to businesses, interest payments etc. Further analysis of state and local government finances services rising by 17.7% and the volume of international imports rising by 14.7%. isand provided in Chapter 8.

2

The ‘balancing item’ in the state accounts – which conceptually includes interstate trade (that is, between Tasmania and the mainland) as well as the increase or T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 decrease in business inventories – subtracted 2.7 percentage points from recorded growth (see Chart 1.7 earlier). At face value, this suggests that some of the

15

TASMANIA’S TRADE According to the ABS State Accounts, Tasmania’s net

The value of Tasmania’s overseas exports of goods rose

international trade contributed 1.6 percentage points to the

by 28% in 2017-18 (Chart 1.13), which the ABS disaggregates

growth in Tasmania’s gross state product in 2017-18 – that is,

into a 19% increase in Tasmania’s export volumes and a

almost half of it – with the volume of international exports

7% increase in the average price of those exports. There is

of goods and services rising by 17.7% and the volume of

only a limited amount of publicly available information on

international imports rising by 14.7%.

the composition of exports at the state level: what there

The ‘balancing item’ in the state accounts – which conceptually includes interstate trade (that is, between Tasmania and the mainland) as well as the increase or decrease in business inventories – subtracted 2.7 percentage points from recorded growth (see Chart 1.7 earlier). At face value, this suggests that some of the increased spending

is suggests that the most significant contributors to the increase in Tasmania’s merchandise exports in 2017-18 were non-ferrous metals (most likely aluminium and zinc), metallic ores (including iron ore), paper and paperboard, seafood and meat, partly offset by a decline in exports of dairy products.

by households, businesses and public sector agencies in

Tasmania’s exports to China rebounded by almost 55% in

Tasmania during 2017-18 was met by increased purchases

2017-18, after falling by 23% in 2016-17. Exports to Japan

from the mainland. In particular, it seems plausible that

and Korea (which is a much smaller market for Tasmanian

a significant proportion of the increase in machinery and

products) also increased by more than 50% in 2017-18, while

equipment investment by Tasmanian businesses in 2017-18

exports to ASEAN rose by 32%. Exports to the EU and US

would have been purchased from interstate or overseas.

rose by 25% and 18% respectively after each falling by more 9 than 20% in 2016-17.

Chart 1.13: Growth in value of merchandise exports, Tasmania and mainland 40 30 20

% change from year earlier (12-month moving total)

Chart 1.14: Tasmania’s merchandise exports, by destination 35

Tasmania

Mainland

% of total

30 25

2007-08

2017-18

20

10

15

0

10 5

-10

0 er th O

EU a re Ko

Source: ABS, International Trade in Goods and Services (5368.0), September 2018.

HK

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

US n pa Ja n a iw Ta na hi C N A SE A

-20

Source: ABS, International Trade in Goods and Services (5368.0), September 2018.

The value of Tasmania’s international services exports rose by 12.6% in 2017-18, nearly all of which was due to greater ‘volumes’ (number of services provided) rather than to higher prices.

16

Tasmania’s services exports have risen at a much more rapid rate – albeit from a much smaller level as a proportion of gross product – than the mainland’s in recent T C years C I TA(Chart S M A N 1.15).

I A R EHowever P O R T 2 0travel 18 services (both education-related and other) account for 92% of Tasmania’s services exports, compared with 64% of the

(5368.0), September 2018.

(5368.0), September 2018.

The value of Tasmania’s international services exports rose by 12.6% in 2017-18, nearly all of which was due to greater ‘volumes’ (number of services provided) rather than to higher prices.

Tasmania’s services exports have risen at a much more rapid rate – albeit from a much smaller level as a proportion of gross product – than the mainland’s in recent years (Chart 1.15). However travel services (both education-related and other) account for 92% of Tasmania’s services exports, compared with 64% of the mainland’s; conversely, business services account for a minuscule proportion of TASMANIA’S TRADE (CONTINUED) Tasmania’s services exports compared with the mainland’s (Chart 1.16).

Chart 1.15: Value of services exports, Tasmania and mainland 1.1 1.0

$bn (4-qtr moving total)

$bn (4-qtr moving total)

Tasmania (left scale)

0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6

Mainland (right scale)

Chart 1.16: Composition of services exports, Tasmania and mainland, 2017 110

60

100

50

90

40

80

30

70 60

0.5

50

0.4

40

08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Balance of Payments and International Investment Position(5302.0), June quarter 2018.

% of total services exports, 2017 Tasmania

Mainland

20 10 0

Educ'nrelated travel

Other travel

Transporrt

Business Other services services

Source: ABS, International Trade: Supplementary Information(5368.0.55.004), Calendar Year 2017.

The value of Tasmania’s international services exports rose

Tasmania’s services exports have risen at a much more rapid

by 12.6% in 2017-18, nearly all of which was due to greater

rate – albeit from a much smaller level as a proportion of

‘volumes’ (number of services provided) rather than to

gross product – than the mainland’s in recent years (Chart

higher prices.

1.15). However travel services (both education-related and other) account for 92% of Tasmania’s services exports, compared with 64% of the mainland’s; conversely, business services account for a minuscule proportion of Tasmania’s services exports compared with the mainland’s (Chart 1.16)

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

17

TASMANIA’S TRADE (CONTINUED)

The number of international students The number of international students in Tasmania has more in Tasmania has more doubled than doubled in the past three years, than from 5,125 in 2015 toin over 10,400 in 2018, according to statistics compiled the past three years, from 5,125 inby the Federal Government (Chart 1.17).

2015 to over 10,400

in 2018, according to statistics compiled by the Federal Overseas students enrolled in VET courses in Tasmania Government (Chart 1.17). account for more than half of this increase, rising from 229 in 2015 to almost 3,400 in 2018, while the number of overseas

Overseas students enrolled in VET courses in Tasmania account for more has risen from 3,500 to just over 5,700 over the same period. than half of this increase, rising from Despite this much more rapid growth in recent years, 229 in 2015 to almost 3,400 in 2018, Tasmania still accounts for only 1.3% of the total number of while the number of overseas students overseas students in Australia – well below its 2.1% share enrolled in courses at the University of of Australia’s population, suggesting that there remains Tasmania has risen from 3,500 to just potential for further growth in overseas student numbers. over 5,700 over the same period. students enrolled in courses at the University of Tasmania

10

Chart 1.17: International student enrolments, Tasmania and mainland 11

'000s

'000s

1,000

10 Tasmania (left scale)

9 8 7 6

1,100

Mainland (right scale)

900 800 700 600

5

500

4

400

3

300

2

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

200

Despite this much more rapid growth Calendar years in recent years, Tasmania still Source: Australian Government Department of Education and accounts for only 1.3% of the total Training, International Student Data 2018. number of overseas students in Australia – well below its 2.1% share of Australia’s population, suggesting that there remains potential for further growth in overseas student numbers.

Tourism The ABS does not recognize tourism as a distinct sector of the economy in most of its statistical publications – including those used extensively throughout this report – in the same way that it does, for example, manufacturing or construction. Rather, tourism-related spending, employment and other forms of economic activity are spread across sectors such as accommodation and food services, transport, retailing, education and training, and arts and recreation services.

Tourism Research Australia (TRA) estimates that tourism directly accounted for 4.9% of Tasmania’s gross state product in 2016-17, and for 7.9% of Tasmanian jobs – higher proportions than for any other state or territory, and well above the corresponding national figures of 3.2% and 5.0% respectively (see Charts 1.18 and 1.19). Including indirect effects of tourism-related activities, TRA estimates that tourism accounted for 10.4% of Tasmania’s GSP in 2016-17, and for 15.8% of total employment – compared with national averages of 6.3% and 7.7% respectively.

The total number of visitors to Tasmania rose by 2.0%, to 1.3mn, in 2017-18, following a 9.1% increase in 2016-17 (Chart 1.20). The number of international visitors rose by 21%, while the number of interstate visitors rose by 1.9%3.

There is a discrepancy in the statistics published by Tourism Tasmania (in its quarterly Tasmanian Tourism Snapshot) between the total number of visitors to Tasmania (1.30mn in 2017-18) and the sum of the numbers of interstate and overseas visitors (1.08mn and 307,000, respectively, in 2017-18). This T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 appears to reflect the use of different data sources. The number of international visitors is sourced from TRA’s International Visitor Survey, which includes cruise ship visitors; the number of interstate visitors, and 3

18

TOURISM The ABS does not recognize tourism as a distinct sector

The total number of visitors to Tasmania rose by 2.0%, to

of the economy in most of its statistical publications –

1.3mn, in 2017-18, following a 9.1% increase in 2016-17 (Chart

including those used extensively throughout this report – in

1.20). The number of international visitors rose by 21%, while

the same way that it does, for example, manufacturing or

the number of interstate visitors rose by 1.9%3.

construction. Rather, tourism-related spending, employment

ABS statistics suggest that since early 2016, the proportion

and other forms of economic activity are spread across

of international visitors to Australia nominating Tasmania as

sectors such as accommodation and food services,

the state or territory in which they ‘spent most time’ has risen

transport, retailing, education and training, and arts and

from 0.6-0.7% to 1.0% (Chart 1.21), representing a significant

recreation services.

increase in Tasmania’s share of Australia’s total overseas

Tourism Research Australia (TRA) estimates that tourism

tourism market.

directly accounted for 4.9% of Tasmania’s gross state

As with Tasmania’s share of the number of international

product in 2016-17, and for 7.9% of Tasmanian jobs – higher

students studying in Australia, however, this is still well

proportions than for any other state or territory, and well

below Tasmania’s share of Australia’s population, pointing to

above the corresponding national figures of 3.2% and 5.0%

the scope for further growth.

respectively (see Charts 1.18 and 1.19). Including indirect effects of tourism-related activities, TRA estimates that tourism accounted for 10.4% of Tasmania’s GSP in 201617, and for 15.8% of total employment – compared with national averages of 6.3% and 7.7% respectively.

Chart 1.18: Tourism as a pc of gross state product, 2016-17 12 % of GSP 10

11

Chart 1.19: Tourism as a pc of total employment, 2016-17 16 % of total employment

Indirect

14

Direct

12

8

Indirect Direct

10 8

6

6

4

4 2 0

2 0 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Aus

Source: Tourism Research Australia, State Tourism Satellite Accounts, 2016-17.

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Aus

Source: Tourism Research Australia, State Tourism Satellite Accounts, 2016-17.

There is a discrepancy statistics published

by Tourism Tasmania (in its quarterly Tasmanian Tourism Snapshot) between the totalto number of ABS statisticsin the suggest that since early 2016, the proportion of international visitors visitors to Tasmania (1.30mn in 2017-18) and the sum of the numbers of interstate and overseas visitors (1.08mn and 307,000, respectively, in 2017Tasmania as the stateofor territory in which ‘spent most 18). Australia This appears tonominating reflect the use of different data sources.

The number international visitors is sourced they from TRA’s International Visitor Survey, which includes cruise ship visitors; the number of interstate visitors, and the total number, is sourced from the Tasmanian Visitor Survey which only time’ has risen from 0.6-0.7% to 1.0% (Chart 1.20), representing a significant increase counts visitors arriving on scheduled sea and air services.

3

in Tasmania’s share of Australia’s total overseas tourism market.

As with Tasmania’s share of the number of international students studying in Australia, however, this is still well below Tasmania’s share of Australia’s population, T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 pointing to the scope for further growth.

19

0

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Aus

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Aus

Source: Tourism Research Australia, State Tourism Satellite Accounts, 2016-17.

Source: Tourism Research Australia, State Tourism Satellite Accounts, 2016-17.

ABS statistics suggest that since early 2016, the proportion of international visitors to Australia nominating Tasmania as the state or territory in which they ‘spent most time’ has risen from 0.6-0.7% to 1.0% (Chart 1.20), representing a significant increase in Tasmania’s share of Australia’s total overseas tourism market.

As with Tasmania’s share of the number of international students studying in Australia,TRADE however, this is still well below Tasmania’s share of Australia’s population, TASMANIA’S (CONTINUED) pointing to the scope for further growth.

Chart 1.20: Visitors to Tasmania

Chart 1.21: Overseas visitors to Australia spending ‘most time in Tasmania’

1,500

1.0

'000s

International Interstate

1,250 1,000

% of total (12-month moving average)

0.9 0.8

750 0.7

500

0.6

250 0

0.5

08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Financial years ended 30 June Note: Figures refer to arrivals by scheduled air and sea services; excludes cruise ship visitors. Source: Tourism Tasmania, Tasmanian Tourism Snapshot, June 2018.

12

Chart 1.22: Overseas visitors to Tasmania by country of origin, 2012-13 and 2017-18

Chart 1.23: Interstate visitors to Tasmania, by state or territory of origin, 2012-13 and 2017-18

60

500

000s 2012-13

50

450

2017-18

400

2012-13

2017-18

300

30

250 200

20

150 100

10 0

000s

350

40

50 China

US

SE Asia

UK

HK

NZ

Other Europe

Source: Tourism Tasmania, Tasmanian Tourism Snapshot, June 2013 and June 2018.

20

Source: ABS, Overseas Arrivals and Departures (3401.0), August 2018.

0

Vic NSW Qld WA

SA

ACT

NT

Source: Tourism Tasmania, Tasmanian Tourism Snapshot, June 2013 and June 2018.

The number of Chinese visitors to Tasmania has increased fourfold over the past five years (Chart 1,21), in part reflecting the exposure Tasmania gained during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Tasmania in November 2014, as well as rapid growth in Chinese outbound tourism more generally. China is now Tasmania’s biggest source of international visitors. There has also been very strong growth in the number of T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 visitors to Tasmania from the US, South-East Asia and (from a much smaller base)

TASMANIA’S TRADE (CONTINUED) The number of Chinese visitors to Tasmania has increased

Victoria continues to be Tasmania’s largest market for

fourfold over the past five years (Chart 1.22), in part reflecting

interstate visitors, but the past five years have experienced

the exposure Tasmania gained during Chinese President Xi

strong growth in the number of visitors from NSW

Jinping’s visit to Tasmania in November 2014, as well as rapid

and Queensland (Chart 1.23), partly as a result of the

growth in Chinese outbound tourism more generally. China

introduction of more direct flights between these states and

is now Tasmania’s biggest source of international visitors.

Tasmania. The more recent commencement of direct flights

There has also been very strong growth in the number of

to Adelaide and Perth from Hobart may have a similar effect

visitors to Tasmania from the US, South-East Asia and (from

in boosting visitor numbers from SA and WA.

a much smaller base) Korea and India, as well as from some European countries (in particular Germany and France).

While tourism is clearly making a significant contribution to the improvement in Tasmania’s economic performance in recent years, and has the potential to continue to do so, it will be important to ensure that Tasmania’s economic and other infrastructure is able to keep pace with the growth in the number of visitors, without adversely affecting the amenity of Tasmanian residents (or, for that matter, detracting from visitors’ experiences). In that context, state government plans for upgrades to roads now carrying much higher volumes of tourist traffic are particularly important. Other challenges include the need to ensure adequate provision is made for the maintenance of major tourist attractions (including parks and reserves) which are dependent on public funding; and to manage emerging tensions between the demand for tourist accommodation and the requirements for adequate and affordable rental housing for Tasmanian residents.

Proudly investing in Tasmania for

over 40 years

At Federal Group we continue to invest in Tasmania and support local communities because we believe Tasmania has a great future ahead. It’s also why we have partnered with the TCCI and Saul Eslake to release the 2018 Tasmania Report.

32854

32854 FGC_TCCI_Tasmania.indd 1

22/11/18 11:17 am

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

21

13

What lies behind the improvement in Tasmania’s economy?

As noted at the beginning of this Chapter, Tasmania is now experiencing its strongest economic performance in a decade. A critical issue for the entire Tasmanian community is whether this strong performance can be sustained.

In considering this, itBEHIND is important to THE note thatIMPROVEMENT the improvement in Tasmania’s WHAT LIES economic fortunes owes a good deal to fortuitous external developments entirely INbeyond TASMANIA’S ECONOMY? the control or influence of the Tasmanian Government. These include: the substantial decline in the value of the Australian dollar from its peak at the • faster growth in Commonwealth Government payments height of the ‘resources boom’ in mid-2012,towhich has helped to restore the the Tasmanian Government, including both Tasmania’s now experiencing its strongest economic performance in a competitiveness of many of Tasmania’s traditional trade-exposed industries share of GST revenue and specific purpose payments, decade. A critical issue for the entire Tasmanian community (Chart 1.23); since 2013-14 (Chart 1.26); and is whether this strong performance can be sustained.

•

As noted at the beginning of this Chapter, Tasmania is

In considering it is important note that the • the this, strong pick-uptoin economic

a rebound in Tasmania’s exports to China,,which activity in • New South Wales and Victoria the had during the years since either side of end the global financial is mostslowed closely aligned, the of the

improvement in Tasmania’s economic fortunes owes a states whose economies Tasmania’s good deal to fortuitous external developments entirely ‘resources boom’ (Chart 1.24);

crisis of 2008-09 (Chart 1.27).

beyond the control or influence of the Tasmanian

These factors also contributed significantly to the last period

• faster growth Government.

These include: in

Commonwealth Government payments to the Tasmanian of relatively strong economic growth in Tasmania, between Government, including both Tasmania’s share of GST revenue and specific 2000-01 and 2007-08. All of these factors subsequently • the substantial decline in the value of the Australian purpose payments, since 2013-14 (Chart 1.25); and went into reverse, either as a result of the global financial dollar from its peak at the height of the ‘resources

crisis or the ‘resources boom’, and thereby also contributed a rebound in Tasmania’s exports to China, which had slowed during the years the period of very poor economic growth which Tasmania either side of the global financial crisis of to 2008-09 (Chart 1.26).

boom’ in mid-2012, which has helped to restore the

•

competitiveness of many of Tasmania’s traditional

experienced between 2009-10 and 2013-14.

trade-exposed industries (Chart 1.24);

These factors also contributed significantly to the last period of relatively strong economic growth in Tasmania, between 2000-01 and 2007-08. All of these factors Wales and Victoria , the states whose economies subsequently went into reverse, either as a result of the global financial crisis or the Tasmania’s is most closely aligned, since the end of ‘resources boom’, the ‘resources boom’ (Chartand 1.25); thereby also contributed to the period of very poor economic growth which Tasmania experienced between 2009-10 and 2013-14.

• the strong pick-up in economic activity in New South

Chart 1.24: Tasmanian real GSP growth and the trade-weighted index (TWI) of the A$ 45

6

50

5

55

4

60

3

2

65

2

1

70

1

0

75

0

80

-1

6

% pa

Tasmania GSP (left scale)

5 4 3

-1

02

04

06

08

10

Index (May 1970 = 100)

A$ TWI (inverted) (right scale)

12

14

16

18

Financial years ended 30 June Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; RBA.

22

Chart 1.25: Tasmanian real GSP growth and real GSP growth in NSW and Victoria

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

% pa

Tasmania GSP (left scale)

% pa

NSW & Vic GSP (right scale)

4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5

02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 Financial years ended 30 June

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0).

1.0

14 WHAT LIES BEHIND THE IMPROVEMENT IN TASMANIA’S ECONOMY? (CONTINUED)

Chart 1.26: Tasmanian real GSP growth and Commonwealth payments to Tasmania 6

% change from previous year

% pa

5

C'wealth payments (right scale)

4 3

Chart 1.27: Tasmanian real GSP growth and Tasmanian exports to China 20

6

15

5

10 5

2

0

Tasmania GSP (left scale)

1 0

-5

-1

-10

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

16

18

Financial years ended 30 June Note: Commonwealth payments excludes one-off payment for Mersey Hospital transfer in 2016-17.

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; Australian Government Budget Paper No. 3, various years

% pa

% pa (current prices)

Exports to China (right scale)

4

100 80 60

3

40

2

20

1

0

0

-20 Tasmania GSP -1 -40 (left scale) 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 Financial years ended 30 June Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0); International Trade in Goods and Services (5368.0), September 2018.

Another serendipitous contributor to the improvement in Tasmania’s economic The Hodgman Government has been generally prudent in its fortunes in recent years, albeit one less readily depicted in charts, was the opening Tasmania’s economic fortunes in recent years, albeit one stewardship of Tasmania’s public finances, as discussed in MONA in inJanuary 2011 – which clearly hasmore had a significant both the less of readily depicted charts, was the opening of MONA detail in Chapter 6. Itimpact has for theon most part responded number and spending patterns of visitors to Tasmania, and on the ‘image’ which in January 2011 – which clearly has had a significant impact effectively to short-term risks facing the Tasmanian 4.

Tasmania presents to the restofof Australia, and to the world atBasslink largecable on both the number and spending patterns visitors to economy (such as the outage in 2015-16, Another serendipitous contributor to the improvement in

Tasmania, and on the ‘image’ which Tasmania presents to

threats to the King Island shipping service, and more recently

However, whilst recognizing the significancethe of potential these ‘exogenous’ influences, the closure of the only abattoir catering to pork present State Government can also claim a producers). share of And theitcredit for the improvement has been able to sustain the upturn in However, whilst recognizing the significance of these in Tasmania’s economic performance since business it took confidence office inwhich March 2014. its initial 2014 accompanied the rest of Australia, and to the world at large4.

‘exogenous’ influences, the present state government can alsoThe claimHodgman a share of the Government credit for the improvement in has been

election victory.

generally prudent in its stewardship of As shown in Chart there is a6.close correlation between Tasmania’s economic performance since it took office in Tasmania’s public finances, as discussed in more detail in 1.28, Chapter It has for the business confidence and economic growth in Tasmania March 2014. most part responded effectively to short-term risks facing the Tasmanian economy – with ‘causality’ flowing in both directions. However (such as the Basslink cable outage in 2015-16, threats toobviously the King Island shipping the fact that Tasmanian businesses have had a consistently service, and more recently the potential closure of the only abattoir catering to pork positive view of state government policy settings since producers). And it has been able to sustain the upturn in business confidence which 2014 – in contrast to the generally negative view of state accompanied its initial 2014 election victory. government policies elsewhere in Australia (Chart 1.29) –

supportsbetween the assessment that state government policies As shown in Chart 1.27, there is a close correlation business confidence have contributed to the upturn in the Tasmanian and economic growth in Tasmania – with ‘causality’ obviously flowing in both economy documented in this chapter. directions. However the fact that Tasmanian businesses have had a consistently positive view of state government policy settings since 2014 – in contrast to the See,generally for example, Sally Raphael, ‘The MONAof effect - how an iconic building canpolicies transform a city’, Hames Sharley, December 2016. negative view state government elsewhere in 13Australia (Chart 1.28) – supports the assessment that state government policies have contributed to the upturn in the Tasmanian economy documented in this chapter.

4

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

23

WHAT LIES BEHIND THE IMPROVEMENT IN TASMANIA’S ECONOMY? (CONTINUED) 15

Chart 1.28: Tasmanian real GSP growth and SME business confidence 6

Net balance

% pa

5

3

50 40 30

Tasmania GSP (left scale)

1

10 04

06

08

'supportive'(%)

0 -20

Mainland states & territories

-40

20

0 02

20

60

2

-1

80 70

Business confidence (right scale)

4

90

Chart 1.29: SME approval of state and territory government policies 40 Net balance Tasmania

10

12

14

16

Financial years ended 30 June

18

0

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; Sensis Business Index, June 2018.

-60 -80

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Source: Sensis Business Index, June 2018.

Now that Tasmania’s improved economic performance is being reflected in a pickMaking the most of this opportunity will also be more up in the growth rate of its population, as more people choose to live here, readily accomplished if the benefits of improved economic is being reflected in a pick-up in the growth rate of its Tasmania has an opportunity to set up an extended period ofshared relatively strong performance are widely (and seen to be so); and if population, as more people choose to live here, Tasmania economic growth which would in relatively turn facilitate a narrowing the largeways shortfall in Tasmania can develop of more effective of managing has an opportunity to set up an extended period of material living standards between Tasmania and the rest of Australia, which has and resolving conflicts over the pattern and pace of strong economic growth which would in turn facilitate a beenofatherecurring theme of the three Tasmania Reports. Government has an important economic development. narrowing large shortfall in material living past standards Now that Tasmania’s improved economic performance

between Tasmania and the rest of Australia, which has been

role to play in these tasks: but they are not the exclusive

As emphasized in Chapter 7 of this year’s Tasmania Report, capitalizing on this role of government. a recurring theme of the past three Tasmania Reports. opportunity calls for an enhanced focus on the drivers of long-term economic As emphasized in Chapter 7 of this year’s Tasmania Report, growth – in particular, participation in employment and productivity – and on capitalizing on this opportunity calls for an enhanced focus improving Tasmania’s capacity to withstand externally generated economic shocks. on the drivers of long-term economic growth – in particular, participation employment andthis productivity – and onwill Makingin the most of opportunity

also be more readily accomplished if the are widely shared (and seen to be so); generated economic shocks. and if Tasmania can develop more effective ways of managing and resolving conflicts over the pattern and pace of economic development. Government has an important role to play in these tasks: but they are not the exclusive role of government. improving Tasmania’s capacity to withstand externally benefits of improved economic performance

Tasmania’s near-term economic outlook In the near term, Tasmania’s economic performance seems likely to be less adversely affected by a number of the factors that could potentially detract from growth in the national economy – such as high levels of household debt and falling property prices on consumer spending.

24

Thus far inAthe current TCC I TA SM NIA R E P Ofinancial R T 2 0 1 8year,

retail sales have grown more rapidly in Tasmania than on the mainland (Chart 1.29); while Tasmania is the only state in

TASMANIA’S NEAR-TERM ECONOMIC OUTLOOK In the near term, Tasmania’s economic performance seems

The near-term outlook for both residential and commercial

likely to be less adversely affected by a number of the factors

construction activity also appears more promising for

that could potentially detract from growth in the national

Tasmania than for the rest of Australia. Tasmanian

economy – such as high levels of household debt and falling

residential building approvals are at their highest level since

property prices on consumer spending.

early 2010, whereas on the mainland, they are at their lowest level in more than four years (Chart 1.32). Non-residential

Thus far in the current financial year, retail sales have grown

building approvals have also picked up significantly in

more rapidly in Tasmania than on the mainland (Chart 1.30);

Tasmania during the past year or so, whereas they appear

while Tasmania is the only state in which motor vehicle sales

to have peaked on the mainland (Chart 1.33).

are growing (Chart 1.31).

As noted earlier in this Chapter, the level of work still to be done on existing private and public sector engineering 16

Chart 1.30: Retail sales – Tasmania and mainland 10 8

sector during 2018-19.

Chart 1.31: Motor vehicle sales – Tasmania and mainland 30

% change from year earlier (trend)

25 Tasmania

6

construction projects points to ongoing strength in this

20 15

4

% change from year earlier (6-mth moving average)

Tasmania

10

2

5

Mainland

0

0 -5

-2

-10

-4

-15

-6

-20 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Retail Trade (8501.0), September 2018.

Mainland

08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: Federated Chamber of Automotive Industries.

The near-term outlook for both residential and commercial construction activity also appears more promising for Tasmania than for the rest of Australia. Tasmanian residential building approvals are at their highest level since early 2010, whereas on the mainland, they are at their lowest level in more than four years (Chart 1.31). Nonresidential building approvals have also picked up significantly in Tasmania during the past year or so, whereas they appear to have peaked on the mainland (Chart 1.32).

As noted earlier in this Chapter, the level of work still to be done on existing private and public sector engineering construction projects points to ongoing strength in this sector during 2018-19.

Chart 1.32: Residential building approvals – Tasmania and mainland 4.0

'000s (annual

'000s (annual

Chart 1.33: Non-residential building approvals – Tasmania and mainland 275

900

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 $mn (12-mth $bn (12-mth 55 moving sum) moving sum)

25

The near-term outlook for both residential and commercial construction activity also appears more promising for Tasmania than for the rest of Australia. Tasmanian residential building approvals are at their highest level since early 2010, whereas on the mainland, they are at their lowest level in more than four years (Chart 1.31). Nonresidential building approvals have also picked up significantly in Tasmania during the past year or so, whereas they appear to have peaked on the mainland (Chart 1.32).

As noted earlier in this Chapter, the level of work still to be done on existing private and public sector engineering projects points to ongoing strength in this TASMANIA’S NEAR-TERM ECONOMIC construction OUTLOOK (CONTINUED) sector during 2018-19.

Chart 1.32: Residential building approvals – Tasmania and mainland 4.0

'000s (annual rate, trend)

'000s (annual rate, trend) Mainland (right scale)

3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5

Tasmania (left scale)

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Building Approvals (8731.0), September 2018.

275

900

250

800

225

700

200

600

175

500

150

400

125

300

100

200

$mn (12-mth moving sum)

$bn (12-mth moving sum) Mainland (right scale)

55 50 45 40 35 30

Tasmania (left scale)

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

25 20 15

Source: ABS, Building Approvals (8731.0), September 2018.

There are also some downside risks in the international

Ideally, Tasmania should be aiming for an extended period

environment, including the potential consequences of

of economic growth averaging around 3% per annum (or

ongoing increases in US interest rates, and the increasing

about 2% per annum in per capita terms). This shouldn’t be

trade tensions between the US and China. If these were

seen as an impossible goal: indeed between 2002-03 and

to materialize in such a way as to substantially weaken

2007-08 Tasmania’s economy grew at an average annual

global economic growth, Tasmania’s economy would

rate of 3.3% per annum (or 2.5% per annum in per capita

not be immune.

terms), aided by a combination of favourable influences

Absent any such shocks, however, it is plausible that Tasmania’s economy could grow at a faster pace in 201819 than the 2¼% projected in this year’s State Budget -a prospect which last year’s Tasmania Report (erroneously) described as ‘a stretch’.

26

Chart 1.33: Non-residential building approvals – Tasmania and mainland

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

similar in many respects to those prevailing more recently (as shown in Charts 1.24-1.27). If it has been done before, it ought to be possible to do it again.

Chapter 2 TASMANIA’S LABOUR MARKET Tasmania’s labour market has continued to improve over the past year, although in some important respects not by as much as might have been expected given the pick-up in Tasmania’s overall economic growth rate. In particular, Tasmania continues to lag the rest of Australia in the creation of full-time jobs. And Tasmania’s labour force participation rate remains well below the national average.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

27

Chapter 2: Tasmania’s labour market Tasmania’s labour market has continued to improve over the past year, although in some important respects not by as much as might have been expected given the pick-up in Tasmania’s overall economic growth rate. In particular, Tasmania continues to lag the rest of Australia in the creation of full-time jobs. And Tasmania’s labour force participation rate remains well below the national average.

EMPLOYMENT IN TASMANIA Employment in Tasmania

Employment grew by 2.9%, on average, in Tasmania in the

Nearly two-thirds of the increase in employment in 2017-18

2017-18 financial year. This was an improvement on the

was in part-time jobs, the number of which rose by 5.4%,

Employment bybut 2.9%, onTasmania’s average, 0.8% growth recordedgrew in 2016-17, (unlike

in Tasmania in the on average, while the2017-18 number offinancial full-time jobsyear. rose by 1.6%. the most recent low pointbut in late 2013, through to overall economic growth rate discussed in Chapter 1) wasgrowthFrom This was an improvement on the 0.8% recorded in 2016-17, (unlike October 2018, employment in Tasmania has risen by almost slightly below the national average (Chart 2.1).

Monthly data Tasmania’s overall economic growth rate discussed in Chapter 1) was slightly below 20,000 (or 8.7%), more than half of which have been suggests that employment growth was stronger in the first the national average (Chart 2.1). Monthly data suggest that employment growth partjobs. half was of 2017-18 than in the second half, andof this2017-18 slower pace stronger in the first half than intime the second half, and this slower pace of job creation has continued into the first few months of the of job creation has continued into the first few months of the current financial year current financial year (Chart 2.2).

(Chart 2.2).

Chart 2.1: Employment growth, states and territories, 2017-18 5 % change from year earlier 4

250

National average

3

Chart 2.2: Level of employment, Tasmania, monthly 255 000s

245

2

240

1

235

0

230

-1

225

-2

220 NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

Seasonally adjusted Trend

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

two-thirds of thein increase in employment in 2017-18proportion was in part-time theare The Nearly level of full-time employment Tasmania is still The below-average of Tasmanianjobs, jobs which number of6½%) which rose by 5.4%, on number of full-time jobs rose by around 11,000 (or below its peak ahead of theaverage, while full-timethe is partly attributable to the Tasmanian workforce 1.6%.

From theago most recenttolow point financial crisis a decade – in contrast mainland

in late being 2013, through to than October 2018, older, on average, that of other parts of Australia, Australia where full-time now almost 13%almostgiven the well-established preference of half workers employment inemployment Tasmaniaishas risen by 20,000 (or 8.7%), more than ofto reduce above its pre-crisis peak (Chart 2.3).

By contrast, the rate their hours of work as they approach retirement.

However, this which have been part-time jobs. of growth in part-time employment in Tasmania has

is not a complete explanation: as of October 2018 more than

full-time employment inofTasmania is of still aroundwith 11,000 (or 6½%) beenThe morelevel or lessof commensurate with that in the rest 10% Tasmanians jobs indicated that below they wereits willing peak ahead Australia (Chart 2.4).

of the financial crisis a decade and ago – to inwork contrast to mainland Australia able more hours, if their employer offered them where full-time employment is now almost 13% pre-crisis national peak average (Chartof2.2). wellabove above theits corresponding 8.3%.

This represents a continuation of a long-term trend which By contrast, the rate of growth in part-time employment in Tasmania has been more began in the early 1980s (Chart 2.5). Full-time jobs represent Another important reason is that industries which rely more or less commensurate with that in the rest of heavily Australia (Chart 2.3). a lower proportion of total employment in Tasmania than on part-time workers have accounted for much of in any other state or territory (Chart 2.6). As discussed in

the job creations which has occurred in Tasmania, especially

more detail in Chapter 7, this is one of three reasons why

over the past decade

Tasmania’s per capita gross product remains significantly below that of other states and territories.

28

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

8.4

Mainland (right scale)

8.2 8.0

155 EMPLOYMENT IN TASMANIA (CONTINUED) 150

90

Mainland (right scale)

85

7.8 7.6

95

3.6 3.4

80

2

3.8

Thousands

160

8.6

Tasmania (left scale)

7.4

3.2

Thousands

75 3.0 Chart 2.3: Full-time employment, Tasmania7.2 Chart 2.4: Part-time employment, Tasmania 145 mainland Tasmania and and 70 mainland 2.8 (left scale) 7.0 170 000s (trend) 8.8 Mns (trend) 4.0 100 000s (trend) Mns (trend) 65 2.6 140 6.8 8.6 3.8 95 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 165 8.4 Mainland Mainland Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018. (right scale) 3.6 90 8.2 (right scale) 160 This represents a continuation of a long-term trend which began in the early 1980s 8.0 3.4 85 (Chart 2.5). Full-time jobs represent a lower proportion of total employment in 155 7.8 Tasmania than in any other state or territory (Chart 2.6). As discussed in more detail in 3.2 80 Chapter 7, this is one of three reasons why per capita gross product 7.6 Tasmania’s Tasmania 150 (left scale) remains significantly below that of other and territories.

7.4states 3.0 75

Thousands

165

Chart 2.4: Part-time employment, Tasmania and mainland Mns (trend) 100 000s (trend) 4.0

Thousands

Chart 2.3: Full-time employment, Tasmania and mainland 170 000s (trend) 8.8 Mns (trend)

The below-average proportion of Tasmanian jobs which are full-time is partly 7.2 Tasmania 2.8 70 attributable to the Tasmanian workforce being older, on average, than that of other (left scale) 7.0 parts of Australia, given the well-established preference of workers to reduce their 2.6 65 140 6.8 hours of work as they approach retirement.

However, this is not a complete 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 explanation: as of October 2018 more than 10% of Tasmanians with jobs indicated Source: ABS, Labour (6202.0), 2018.

Labouremployer Force (6202.0), Octoberthem 2018. that they wereForce willing andOctober able to work moreSource: hours,ABS, if their offered well above theacorresponding national average ofwhich 8.3%. began in the early 1980s This represents continuation of a long-term trend 145

(Chart 2.5).

Full-time of totaljobs employment in Chart 2.5: Full-time jobsjobs as arepresent pc of total a lower proportion Chart 2.6: Full-time as a pc of total Tasmania than in any and other state or territory employment, (Chart 2.6). As discussed employment, Tasmania Australia October 2018in more detail in Chapter 7, this is one of three reasons why Tasmania’s per capita gross product 90 % of total employment (trend) 85 % of labour force

remains significantly below that of other states and territories. (trend), October 2018

80 85 The below-average proportion of Tasmanian jobs which are full-time is partly

attributable to the Tasmanian workforce being older, on average, than that of other

75 80 parts of Australia, given the well-established preference of National workers to reduce their

hours of work as they approach retirement. However, this isaverage not a complete 70 75 explanation: as of October 2018 more than 10% of Tasmanians with jobs indicated Australia that they were willing and able to work more65hours, if their employer offered them well above the corresponding national average of 8.3%.

70 Chart 2.5: Full-time jobs as a pc of total 65 employment, Tasmania and Australia Tasmania 90 % of total employment (trend) 60 85 78 83 88 93 98 03 08 13

18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

80 75

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

75 70

Australia

70 65

60 Chart 2.6: Full-time jobs as a pc of total employment, October 2018 55 85 % of labour force (trend), October 2018 50 80 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT National average

65 60

Tasmania

55

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

29

3

Another important reason is that industries which rely more heavily on part-time workers have accounted for much of the job creations which has occurred in Tasmania, IN especially over the past decade EMPLOYMENT TASMANIA (CONTINUED) As shown in Chart 2.7, the only sectors which have created a significant number of

By contrast, all but fourpoint sectorsfor of the Tasmanian economy As shown in Chart 2.7, the only sectors which have created a(the most full-time jobs in Tasmania since 2013-14 recent low total have generated increases part-time employment significant number of full-time in Tasmania since 2013employment) havejobs been construction (where more than 5,000infull-time jobs haveover

past four years – including all but one of the 12 services been created in the past four years), health the care and social assistance, and art and sectors where part-time employment typically accounts for been construction (where more than 5,000 full-time jobs recreation services. In most other sectors, full-time employment has either declined, a larger share of employment. have been created in the past four years), health care and or increased only marginally, over the past four years. Even in 2017-18, when (as social assistance, and art and recreation services. In most noted in Chapter 1) every sector of the Tasmanian economy except for wholesale other sectors, full-time employment has either declined, or trade recorded an increase in value added, seven sectors recorded declines in fullincreased only marginally, over the past four years. Even in time employment.

2017-18, when (as noted in Chapter 1) every sector of the 14 (the most recent low point for total employment) have

Tasmanian economy except for wholesale trade recorded an

By contrast, all but four sectors of the Tasmanian economy have generated increases in part-time employment over the past four years – including all but one of full-time employment. the 12 services sectors where part-time employment typically accounts for a larger share of employment. increase in value added, seven sectors recorded declines in

Chart 2.7: Change in full- and part-time employment by industry sectors, Tasmania, 2013-14 to 2017-18 Agriculture, forestry & fishing Mining Manufacturing Electricity, gas & water Construction Wholesale trade Retail trade Accommod’n & food services Transport, postal & warehousing Inform’n, media & telco services Financial & insurance services Rental, hiring & real estate services Profsnl, scientific & tech services Admin & support services Public admin & safety Education & training Health care & social assistance Art & recreation services Other services

Note: Charts show the difference in the average levels of employment in each sector in August, November, February and May of 2013-14 and 2017-18 respectively . Source: ABS, Labour Force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018.

30

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

4

Unemployment and under-employment Tasmania’s unemployment rate has continued to edge lower, reaching 5.7% (in trend terms) in October 2018, the lowest since August 2011, and well down on the peak of 7.9% reached between August and October 2013. However, despite Tasmania’s faster overall economic growth rate in 2017-18, the margin between Tasmaniaaverage no longer has the widened highest unemployment rate in Tasmania’s unemployment rate has continued edge the mainland Tasmania’s unemployment ratetoand has since midAustralia – as it did for much of the period between the early lower, reaching 5.7% (in trend terms) in October 2018, the 2017 (Chart 2.8).

UNEMPLOYMENT AND UNDER-EMPLOYMENT lowest since August 2011, and well down on the peak of

1990s and mid-2015 (Chart 2.9). That ‘title’ has instead been

no longer has the highest unemployment rate in Australia – asAustralia it did for held by either Queensland or Western over the past 7.9%Tasmania reached between August and October 2013. However, much of the period the early and mid-2015 (Chart That ‘title’rate in However it is notable that 2.9). the unemployment despite Tasmania’s faster overallbetween economic growth rate in 1990syear.

Australia –Australia where, like Tasmania, thepast unemployment 2017-18, margin between unemployment hasthe instead been Tasmania’s held by either QueenslandSouth or Western over the year. rate has historically considerably higher than rate However and the mainland average hasthat widened mid-2017 it is notable thesince unemployment rate in Southbeen Australia – where, likethe nationalbeen averageconsiderably – has declined by 2.2 percentage (Chart 2.8).

Tasmania, the unemployment rate has historically higher thanpoints the over the past three years, almost three times as much as national average – has declined by 2.2 percentage points over the past three years, Tasmania’s unemployment rate. almost three times as much as Tasmania’s unemployment rate.

Chart 2.8: Unemployment rate, Tasmania and mainland 8 % of labour force (trend)

Chart 2.9: Unemployment rates, states and territories, October 2018 6.5 6.0

7

Tasmania

National average

5.0

6

4.5

5

4

5.5

% of labour force (trend)

Mainland

4.0 3.5 3.0

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

Tasmania’s unemployment rate remains lower than it would otherwise be but for a The main reason for Tasmania’s low labour force substantially lower labour force participation rate than the rest of Australia (Chart participation rate is the older age structure of Tasmania’s would otherwise be but for a substantially lower labour 2.10). Hypothetically, if Tasmania had the same labour force participation rate as ‘working-age’ population (which labour force statistics force participation rate than the rest of Australia (Chart the rest of Australia, all else being equal its unemployment rate would have24% been define as people aged 15 and over). Almost of 2.10). Hypothetically, if Tasmania had the same labour force 12.4% in October, or more than double the actual number.

Tasmania’s working-age population is aged 65 or over, participation rate as the rest of Australia, all else being equal Tasmania’s unemployment rate remains lower than it

its unemployment rate would have been 12.4% in October, or

compared with about 19½% of the mainland’s. Because

The main reason for Tasmania’s low labour force participation rate is the older age the participation rates of people aged 65 and over are structure of Tasmania’s ‘working-age’ population (which labour force statistics about one-sixth of those of people aged 15-64, this define as people aged 15 and over). Almostdifference 24% of inTasmania’s working-age age structure accounts for about two-thirds population is aged 65 or over, compared with about 19½% of the mainland’s. of the difference between Tasmania’s participation rate Because the participation rates of people aged 65ofand over are about one-sixth of and that the rest of Australia. those of people aged 15-64, this difference in age structure accounts for about twothirds of the difference between Tasmania’s participation rate and that of the rest of Australia.

more than double the actual number.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

31

5 UNEMPLOYMENT AND UNDER-EMPLOYMENT (CONTINUED)

Chart 2.10: Labour force participation rate, Tasmania and mainland

Chart 2.11: Employment-to-population ratio, Tasmania and mainland

67

64

66

% of civilian working age population (trend)

63

Mainland

62

65 Mainland

64

61 60

63

59

62

58

Tasmania

61

Tasmania

57 56

60 59

% of civilian working age population (trend)

55 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

54

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

The The remaining one-third of the difference duedifference to remaining one-third of isthe

Disappointingly, ‘gap’ between Tasmania’s employmentis due to lowerthe age-specific participation to-population ratio and the mainland’s has widened since rate of Tasmanians aged 15-64 is about 1½ the middle of 2017 (Chart 2.11). Narrowing this gap – to the participation rate of Tasmanians aged 15-64 about 1½ percentage points below theismainland average. lower age-specific participation rates: the labour force rates: the labour force participation percentage points below the mainland average.

extent that Tasmania’s demographic profile permits – would

The combination of a lower labour force participation rate and to a sustaining higher improvements in make a major contribution The combination of a lower labour force participation rate unemployment rate means that the proportion of Tasmania’s (working Tasmanians’ living standards over theage) longer term. and a higher unemployment rate means that the proportion population which is actually working is almost 5 percentage points lower than it is in of Tasmania’s (working age) population which is actually the rest of Australia, on average. This is another important reason why Tasmania’s working is almost 5 percentage points lower than it is in per capita gross product remains significantly below that of other states and the rest of Australia, on average. This is another important territories, as explained in greater depth in Chapter 7. reason why Tasmania’s per capita gross product remains Disappointingly, the ‘gap’ between Tasmania’s employment-to-population ratio and the mainland’s has widened since the middle of 2017. Narrowing this gap – to the extent that Tasmania’s demographic profile permits – would make a major contribution to sustaining improvements in Tasmanians’ living standards over the longer term.

significantly below that of other states and territories, as explained in greater depth in Chapter 7.

Long-term and youth unemployment Although Tasmania’s unemployment rate has declined by more than 2 percentage points over the past five years, the incidence of long-term unemployment in Tasmania remains persistently high (Chart 2.12). Almost 30% of unemployed Tasmanians have been out of work for more than a year (and of them, more than half have been out of work for more than two years). This proportion has declined by almost 3 percentage points over the past year, but remains relatively high by historical standards. It is also well above the mainland average of 24%.

32

Moreover, those Tasmanians who have been unemployed for more than a year appear to be taking longer to find work. The median duration of unemployment T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 among this group has increased to 125 weeks over the year to September, the

LONG-TERM AND YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT Although Tasmania’s unemployment rate has declined by

Moreover, those Tasmanians who have been unemployed

more than 2 percentage points over the past five years,

for more than a year appear to be taking longer to find work.

the incidence of long-term unemployment in Tasmania

The median duration of unemployment among this group

remains persistently high (Chart 2.12). Almost 30% of

has increased to 125 weeks over the year to September, the

unemployed Tasmanians have been out of work for more

longest in a decade and 16 weeks more than the national

than a year (and of them, more than half have been out of

average (Chart 2.13).

work for more than two years). This proportion has declined by almost 3 percentage points over the past year, but remains relatively high by historical standards. It is also well

6

above the mainland average of 24%.

Chart 2.12: Incidence of long-term (> 1 year) unemployment, Tasmania and mainland

Chart 2.13: Median duration of long-term unemployment, Tasmania and Australia

35

150

30

Unemployed for > 1 year as % of total (12-months moving average)

140 Tasmania

25

Weeks (12-month moving average)

130

Tasmania

120 Mainland

20

110 100

15 10

Australia

90 80 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force, Detailed (6291.0.55.001), September 2018.

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force, Detailed (6291.0.55.001), September 2018.

The progress Tasmania had been making in reducing youth unemployment appears to have stalled over the past year, with the unemployment rate among Tasmanians aged 15-24 rising by around 1½ percentage points since late 2017, in contrast to an ongoing decline on the mainland (Chart 2.14). In South Australia, which like Tasmania has long experienced above-average rates of youth unemployment, the unemployment rate among people 15-24 year olds has declined by almost 3½ percentage points over the past year, to the lowest in more than five years.

The proportion of 15-24 year old Tasmanians who are in neither full-time education nor in the labour force (ie, neither working nor actively looking for work) remains considerably higher than the corresponding figure for the mainland (Chart 2.15).

Chart 2.14: Youth unemployment rates, Tasmania and mainland 20 % of 15-24 year old labour force

Chart 2.15: 15-24 year olds not in education or the work force, Tasmania and mainland 10 % of 15-24 year old population (12-month moving average)

(12-month moving average)

18 Tasmania

9

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

33

Mainland

20

110 100

15 10

Australia

90 80 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force, Detailed (6291.0.55.001),

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force, Detailed (6291.0.55.001),

September 2018.

September 2018.

LONG-TERM AND YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT (CONTINUED)

The progress Tasmania had been making in reducing youth unemployment appears The proportion of 15-24 year old Tasmanians who are to have stalled over the past year, with the unemployment rate among Tasmanians in neither full-time education nor in the labour force unemployment appears to have stalled over the past year, aged 15-24 rising by around 1½ percentage points since late 2017, in contrast to an (ie, neither working nor actively looking for work) remains with the unemployment rate among Tasmanians aged ongoing decline on the mainland (Chart 2.14). In South Australia, which like considerably higher than the corresponding figure for the 15-24 rising by around 1½ percentage points since late 2017, Tasmania has long experienced above-average rates of youth unemployment, the mainland (Chart 2.15). in contrast to an ongoing decline on the mainland (Chart ratelikeamong 2.14).unemployment In South Australia, which Tasmaniapeople has long 15-24 year olds has declined by almost 3½ percentage points over the past year, to the lowest in more than five years. experienced above-average rates of youth unemployment, The progress Tasmania had been making in reducing youth

the unemployment rate among people 15-24 year olds has

The proportion of 15-24 year old Tasmanians who are in neither full-time education nor in the labour force (ie, neither working nor actively looking for work) remains to the lowest in more than five years. considerably higher than the corresponding figure for the mainland (Chart 2.15). declined by almost 3½ percentage points over the past year,

Chart 2.14: Youth unemployment rates, Tasmania and mainland 20 % of 15-24 year old labour force

Chart 2.15: 15-24 year olds not in education or the work force, Tasmania and mainland 10 % of 15-24 year old population (12-month moving average)

(12-month moving average)

18 16

Tasmania

9 Tasmania

8

14 12 Mainland

7

10 8

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force, Detailed (6291.0.55.001), September 2018.

34

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

6

Mainland

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Labour Force, Detailed (6291.0.55.001), September 2018.

7

Labour earnings The persistence of historically slow rates of wages growth has gained increased attention from economic policy-makers in Australia and other ‘advanced’ economies in recent years. As the Reserve Bank has recently noted, “wages growth has been persistently lower than what the usual relationships” with factors such as the extent of ‘spare capacity in the labour market’ (unemployment and underemployment) and inflation expectations would imply; and that the common The persistence of historically slow rates of wages growth Surprisingly, the ABS wage price index data suggests that, in experience of a number of ‘advanced’ economies “suggests a role for … factors has gained increased attention from economic policyTasmania, pay rates have risen at a faster rate in the private such as a decline in labour’s relative bargaining power, and the effects of makers in Australia and other ‘advanced’ economies in sector than in the public sector (Chart 2.17) the reverse of technological change and globalization”1.

LABOUR EARNINGS

recent years. As the Reserve Bank has recently noted,

the pattern at the national level. It is possible that the most

“wages growth has been persistently lower than the While wages grew less rapidly inwhat Tasmania

recent minimum wage increase of 3.3% than innational the rest of Australia during thehas had a greater impact on private sector pay rates in Tasmania ‘resources boom’ earlier this decade (largely because there was no ‘resources capacity in the labour market’ (unemployment and under(where a larger proportion of employees are affected by boom’ here), wages growth has since slowed less markedly in Tasmania than in the employment) and inflation expectations would imply; and changes in award wages) than nationally. rest of Australia, and more recently appears to have picked up a little more than in that the common experience of a number of ‘advanced’ Although pay rates appear to have been growing at a faster other states and territories (Chart 2.16). usual relationships” with factors such as the extent of ‘spare

economies “suggests a role for … factors such as a decline in labour’s relative bargaining power, and the effects of Surprisingly, the ABS wage price index

rate in Tasmania recently than in the rest of Australia, on

data suggests Tasmania, pay rates remains average, thethat, level ofin wages and salaries in Tasmania technological change and globalization”5.1 have risen at a faster rate in the private sector than inlower the than public sector the reverse considerably in other states–and territories. of the pattern at the national level.

It is possible that the most recent national While wages grew less rapidly in Tasmania than in the rest For working Tasmanian adults, average weekly ordinary of Australia duringwage the ‘resources boom’of earlier thishas decade minimum increase 3.3% had a greater impact on private sector pay time earnings in May this year (the most recent ABS report) (largely because there was no ‘resources boom’ here), rates in Tasmania (where a larger proportionwere of employees are affected by $1,379, lower than in any other state or changes territory and wages haswages) since slowed lessnationally. markedly in Tasmania in growth award than $206 per week (or 13%) below the national average. than in the rest of Australia, and more recently appears

Although appear have to have picked up pay a littlerates more than in otherto states and been

growing at a faster rate in Tasmania recently territories (Chartthan 2.16). in the rest of Australia, on average, the level of wages and salaries in Tasmania remains considerably lower than in other states and territories.

Chart 2.16: Ordinary hourly rates of pay, Tasmania and mainland 5.0 % change from year earlier

Chart 2.17: Total hourly rates of pay, private and public sectors, Tasmania

4.5

5.0

4.0

4.5 Mainland

3.5 3.0 2.5

Tasmania

Public sector

4.0

Private sector

3.0 2.5 2.0

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Note: excludes bonuses. Source: ABS, Wage Price Index (6345.0), September quarter 2018.

1

% change from year earlier

3.5

2.0 1.5

5.5

1.5

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Note: excludes bonuses. Source: ABS, Wage Price Index (6345.0), September quarter 2018.

Reserve Bank of Australia, Statement on Monetary Policy, November 2018, pp. 59-60.

Reserve Bank of Australia, Statement on Monetary Policy, November 2018, pp. 59-60.

5

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

35

8

For working Tasmanian adults, average weekly ordinary time earnings in May this year (the most recent ABS report) were $1,379, lower than in any other state or territory and $206 per week (or 13%) below the national average.

Another way of analysing differences in labour earnings between Tasmania and the rest of Australia can be obtained from the ABS State Accounts. According to these, ‘employee compensation’ per hour worked in Tasmania in 2017-18 was $34.75, lower LABOUR EARNINGS (CONTINUED) than in any other state or territory and $6.90 per hour (or 18%) below the national 2 average (Chart 2.18). Moreover, because Tasmanian workers work fewer hours, on average, than their counterparts in other states and territories, average annual Another way of analysing differences in labour earnings If employee compensationtheir is expressed in terms of dollars between Tasmania and the of Australia can be obtained perthan dollar value goods and produced, rather compensation ofrest $55,502 in 2017-18 was more 20%ofbelow theservices national fromaverage. the ABS State Accounts. According to these, ‘employee than as dollars per hour worked – a concept economists compensation’ per hour worked in Tasmania in 2017-18 was

refer to as unit labour costs – then average employee

One ofthan theinmain reasons why hourly compensation rates are lower inthan Tasmania $34.75, lower any other state or territory and $6.90 compensation in Tasmania is less 5% belowthan the

labour productivity (production of goods national average (Chart 2.19). and because services per hour worked) is more Moreover, Tasmanian workers work fewer hours, than 22% below the national average (a Put differently, from an employer’s perspective, labour costs on average, than their counterparts other states and difference explored in inmore detail in Chapter 7). in Tasmania aren’t as low, relative to the rest of Australia, as in other states territories is62because per hour (or 18%) belowand the national average (Chart 2.18).

territories, their average annual compensation of $55,502 in

a simple comparison of average wage levels would suggest. in terms of dollars per dollar value of goods and services produced, rather than as dollars hour – aforconcept Ofper course that’sworked little comfort Tasmanian employees.

One of the main reasons why hourly compensation Butaverage the comparison highlights the point that the onlyin way in economists refer to as unit labour costs – then employee compensation rates are lower in Tasmania than in other states and which the gap between average labour incomes in Tasmania Tasmania is less than 5% below the national average (Chart 2.19).

If employee compensation is expressed 2017-18 was more than 20% below the national average.

territories is because labour productivity (production of goods and services per hour worked) is more than 22%

and the rest of Australia can be sustainably narrowed is

by lifting the productivity Tasmanian workers Put differently, from an employer’s perspective, labour costs inofTasmania aren’trelative as to those in other states territories – a theme which is low, relative to the rest of Australia, as a simple comparison ofand average wage levels more detail in Chapter 7). revisited in Chapter 7. would suggest. below the national average (a difference explored in

Chart 2.18: Average employee compensation per hour, states and territories, 2017-18 80 $ per hour worked

Chart 2.19: Unit labour costs, states and territories, 2017-18 80 $ per $ value of goods

70

70

60

60

50

and services produced

50

National average

40

40

30

30

20

NSW Vic Qld SA

National average

WA Tas

NT ACT

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18, and Labour Force, Australia (6202.0), October 2018.

20

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18, and Labour Force, Australia (6202.0), October 2018.

‘Employee compensation’ includes superannuation contributions and workers’ compensation insurance premiums as well as wages and salaries. The estimates of compensation per hour used here are derived by dividing the published estimates of total annual employee compensation by an estimate of total annual hours worked, which is in turn derived from the monthly labour force survey.

2

‘Employee compensation’ includes superannuation contributions and workers’ compensation insurance premiums as well as wages and salaries.

The estimates of compensation per hour used here are derived by dividing the published estimates of total annual employee compensation by an estimate of total annual hours worked, which is in turn derived from the monthly labour force survey.

6

36

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Chapter 3 TASMANIA’S RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MARKET Tasmania’s residential property market has once again been the strongest in Australia (in terms of price performance) over the past year – reflecting both the improvement in the state’s economy (discussed in Chapter 1) and the pickup in population growth (discussed in more detail in Chapter 4). It is a tangible indication of greater confidence in Tasmania’s future.

However, it would be unrealistic to expect that Tasmania will remain completely immune from some of the factors weighing on property prices elsewhere in Australia – in particular, the recent and prospective tightening in credit conditions. And it is also important to note that there has been a ‘downside’ to the strong performance of the Tasmanian property market for those who do not own property and have been exposed to greater difficulties in finding rental accommodation and/or markedly higher rents, particularly in Hobart.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

37

However, it would be unrealistic to expect that Tasmania will remain completely immune from some of the factors weighing on property prices elsewhere in Australia – in particular, the recent and prospective tightening in credit conditions. And it is also important to note that there has been a ‘downside’ to the strong performance of the Tasmanian property market for those who do not own property and have been exposed to greater difficulties in finding rental accommodation and/or markedly higher rents, particularly in Hobart.

Residential property prices Tasmanian residential property values rose by PRICES 10.5% over twelve months to October RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY

2018, according to the hedonic indices compiled by CoreLogic. By contrast, property prices in thevalues five rose mainland cities declined an average of have 4.6%risen the past three years, by Tasmanian home values Tasmanian residential property by 10.5% capital over over this period; while in non-metropolitan areas of the mainland states property by 24.2%, compared with a net gain of 5%, on average, in twelve months to October 2018, according to the hedonic prices rose only 0.8%, andproperty have prices actually declined by about 1% just over the past six the five mainland capitals and under 10% for regional indices compiled by by CoreLogic.

By contrast, months.

Over thecities past threebyyears, Tasmanian home by 24.2%, areas on thevalues mainlandhave (Chart risen 3.1). Despite these more in the five mainland capital declined an average of rapid recent years, the level of residential property 4.6% over this period; whileainnet non-metropolitan the compared with gain of 5%,areas on ofaverage, ingains the infive mainland capitals and just prices remains substantially lower in Tasmania than on the mainland states property prices rose by only 0.8%, and have under 10% for regional areas on the mainland (Chart 3.1). Despite these more rapid mainland (Chart 3.2). remains substantially actually declined by aboutyears, 1% overthe the past six months.

Over gains in recent level of residential property prices lower in Tasmania than on the mainland (Chart 3.2).

Chart 3.1: Hedonic home value indices, Tasmania, metropolitan and regional averages 150

650

Index (Dec 2009 = 100)

140

Five mainland capital cities

130

600 Tasmania

120 110 100

Regional Australia

550

Rolling 3-mth median ($000)

Five mainland capital cities

500 450 400

Regional Australia

350

90

300

80 70

Chart 3.2: Median sale prices, Tasmania, metropolitan and regional averages

250 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

200

Tasmania

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Note: Hedonic indices measure the ‘organic change’ in underlying sale values of properties using the

hedonic imputation methodology. They are designed to show rates of change in property prices rather than the level of prices. The median price is the middle (50th percentile) price of all transactions during the preceding three months. Source: CoreLogic Property Market Indices.

38

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY PRICES (CONTINUED)

Chart 3.3: Hedonic home value indices, ‘Greater Hobart’ and regional Tasmania 140

Index (Dec 2009 = 100)

130

'Greater Hobart'

120

Chart 3.4: Median sale prices, Hobart, Launceston and NW Coast 550 $000

Hobart

500 450 400

110

350 300

100 Rest of Tasmania

90 80

2

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: CoreLogic.

Launceston

250 200 150

North-west Coast

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: Real Estate Institute of Tasmania.

The buoyancy in property prices hasn’t been confined to Hobart over the past year, However it’s not clear that this represents a signal that The as buoyancy in property prices hasn’t been confined to of 2017. it had been during 2016 and much The CoreLogic hedonic home value prices Tasmania have peaked.

CoreLogic data Hobart over the year, as itHobart’ had been during and over property index forpast ‘Greater rose 2016 by 9.7% the year toinOctober – but although this suggest that properties in Hobart are continuing to sell much of 2017.

The CoreLogic hedonic home value index for was much larger than for any other capital city (and indeed contrasted with falls in very quickly by historical standards, typically 11-12 days over the ‘Greater Hobart’Melbourne rose by 9.7% over the year to October – but Sydney, and Perth), it was nonetheless surpassed by an 11.4% increase in past year, down from an average of more than 50 days although this was much larger than for any other capital city the rest of Tasmania (Chart 3.3). (and indeed contrasted with falls in Sydney, Melbourne and

earlier this decade. Properties are also selling more quickly

Perth), it wasgranular nonetheless surpassed by an 11.4% in More data compiled byincrease the Real

in regional Tasmania at any time since before Estate Institute ofthan Tasmania present a the financial crisis (Chart 3.6), as well as more quickly Over the year to the September quarter, median salesthan in regional areas of other states.

By contrast,to properties bybyREIT members roseofby 10% in Launceston, as opposed 9% in are Moreprices granularrecorded data compiled the Real Estate Institute taking longer to sell in most mainland capitals, particularly Hobart; although prices the the North Tasmania present a somewhat similaralong picture. Over year West Coast rose by 8% over this period in Sydney.

(Chart 3.4). to the September quarter, median sales prices recorded by the rest of Tasmaniasimilar (Chart 3.3). somewhat picture.

REIT members rose by 10% in Launceston, as opposed to

There’s also little evidence of Tasmanian vendors having to

REIT data point to some easing in the number of residential property sales in Hobart lower their price expectations in order to complete sales.

9% in Hobart; although prices along the North West Coast since the middle of 2017, and more recentlyThe in Launceston, although sales volumes median ‘vendor discount’ in Hobart fell to about 3½% in rose by 8% over this period (Chart 3.4). on the North West Coast have continued to Hobart, increase (Chart and just under 3.5).

4½% in regional Tasmania, during the REIT data point to some easing in the number of residential

property sales in it’s Hobart the middle of 2017, and more However notsince clear that this represents

September quarter of 2018, down from around 5-5½% two

a signal that property prices in Tasmania years previously; whereas vendor discounts have been rising recently in Launceston, although sales volumes on the North have peaked. CoreLogic data suggest that properties in Hobart are continuing to in most mainland capitals since mid-2017 (again especially Westsell Coast have continued to increase (Chart 3.5). very quickly by historical standards, typically 11-12 days over the past year, down in Sydney). from an average of more than 50 days earlier this decade. Properties are also selling more quickly in regional Tasmania than at any time since before the financial crisis (Chart 3.6), as well as more quickly than in regional areas of other states. By contrast, properties are taking longer to sell in most mainland capitals, particularly in Sydney.

There’s also little evidence of Tasmanian vendors having to lower their price expectations in order to complete sales. The median ‘vendor discount’ in Hobart fell T CTasmania, C I TA S M Aduring N I A Rthe EPORT 2018 to about 3½% in Hobart, and just under 4½% in regional September quarter of 2018, down from around 5-5½% two years previously; whereas

39

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY PRICES (CONTINUED)

3

Chart 3.5: Volume of residential property sales, Tasmania 3,000

Chart 3.6: Median time on the market, Hobart and regional Tasmania.

120

4-quarter moving total

Hobart

2,500

Days

100

2,000

Rest of Tasmania

80

1,500

60

Launceston

1,000

40

500

20 'Greater Hobart'

North-west Coast 0

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: Real Estate Institute of Tasmania.

0

08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: CoreLogic.

Housing finance The number of housing finance commitments to owner-occupiers in Tasmania picked up modestly over the past year, in marked contrast to the declines registered in every other state and territory (Chart 3.7). With the average mortgage taken out

by Tasmanian home-buyers continuing to rise (to an average of $264,500 in the first three months of 2017-18, up from $226,300 in 2015-16), in line with higher property prices, the value of finance commitment to home-buyers in Tasmania has risen by almost 10% in the first three months of 2017-18 over a year earlier (Chart 3.8).

Thousands

Chart 3.7: Number of housing finance commitments to owner-occupiers 1.5 '000s per month 1.4 1.3 1.2

(trend)

'000s per month (trend)

Mainland (right scale)

1.0

0.8

65 60

1.1

0.9

Chart 3.8: Value of housing finance commitments to owner-occupiers

55 50

Tasmania (left scale)

45

0.7

40

T C 0.6 C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

40

300 275 250

$mn per month (trend))

$bn per month (trend)

Mainland (right scale)

22 20 18

225

16

200

14

175 150

Tasmania (left scale)

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

12 10

3

Chart 3.5: Volume of residential property sales, Tasmania 3,000

Chart 3.6: Median time on the market, Hobart and regional Tasmania.

120

4-quarter moving total

2,500

Hobart

100

2,000

Rest of Tasmania

80

HOUSING FINANCE 1,500

Days

60

Launceston

The number of housing finance commitments to owner-

Regulatory measures – in particular, the clamp-down on

occupiers in Tasmania picked up modestly over the past

interest-only lending – have had a much larger impact on

year, in marked contrast to the declines registered in every

the willingness of banks and other mortgage providers

other state and territory (Chart 3.7). With the average

to lend to investors. Changing expectations for future

to rise (to an average of $264,500 in theNorth-west first three months Coast

'Greater impact on the demand for finance fromHobart' investors than on

of 2017-18, 0 up from $226,300 in 2015-16), in line with higher

that from 0 home-buyers (for many of whom the falls in

buyers in Tasmania has risen by almost 10% in the first three Source: Real Estate Institute of Tasmania. months of 2017-18 over a year earlier (Chart 3.8).

rather than a threat). In the year to September, the value of Source: CoreLogic. finance commitments to investors fell by 13.4% nation-wide,

1,000

40

500taken out by Tasmanian home-buyers continuing mortgage

20 movements in property prices have also had a bigger

property prices, of 10 finance commitment 06the 07value 08 09 11 12 13 14 15 to 16home17 18

prices in most mainland 08 09 10 11capitals 12 13represents 14 15 an 16opportunity, 17 18

whereas the value of lending to home-buyers rose by 1.3%.

By contrast, the average mortgage taken out by mainland

Housing finance

home-buyers has declined slightly, to an average of just

Thus far, however, these developments appear to have

under $400,000 in the first quarter of 2018-19. This probably

had little influence on demand from, or lending to, property

The number of housing finance commitmentsinvestors to owner-occupiers in Tasmania in Tasmania. The value of new lending to property picked up modestly over the past year, in marked contrast to the declines investors in Tasmania rose by almost 5% inregistered the year ended over the past year – although it may be that the tightening in every other state and territory (Chart 3.7).

With the average mortgage taken out September (Chart 3.9). in mortgage lending criteria at the behest of regulators Tasmanian home-buyersofcontinuing and by ahead of the likely recommendations the banking to rise (to an average of $264,500 in the first three months ofhaving 2017-18, up from $226,300 in 2015-16), in line with higher property Royal Commission is also some impact on average loanprices, sizes. the value of finance commitment to home-buyers in Tasmania has risen by almost 10% in the first three months of 2017-18 over a year earlier (Chart 3.8). reflects the decline in property prices in mainland centres

Thousands

Chart 3.7: Number of housing finance commitments to owner-occupiers 1.5 '000s per month 1.4 1.3 1.2

(trend)

'000s per month (trend)

Mainland (right scale)

1.0

0.8

65 60

1.1

0.9

Chart 3.8: Value of housing finance commitments to owner-occupiers

55 50

Tasmania (left scale)

45

0.7 0.6

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

40

Source: ABS, Housing Finance (5609.0), September 2018.

300 275 250

$mn per month (trend))

$bn per month (trend)

Mainland (right scale)

22 20 18

225

16

200

14

175 150

Tasmania (left scale)

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

12 10

Source: ABS, Housing Finance (5609.0), September 2018.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

41

By contrast, the average mortgage taken out by mainland home-buyers has declined slightly, to an average of just under $400,000 in the first quarter of 2018-19.

This probably reflects the decline in property prices in mainland centres over the past year – although it may be that the tightening in mortgage lending criteria at the behest of regulators and ahead of the likely recommendations of the banking Royal Commission is also having some impact on average loan sizes.

Regulatory measures – in particular, the clamp-down on interest-only lending – have had a much larger impact on the willingness of banks and other mortgage providers to lend to investors. Changing expectations for future movements in property prices HOUSING FINANCE have also had (CONTINUED) a bigger impact on the demand for finance from investors than on that from home-buyers (for many of whom the falls in prices in most mainland them ‘negatively whereas fewer than 13% of Investors have historically accounted for a smaller share of capitals represents an opportunity, rather than aare threat).

In geared’), the year to September, taxpayers in the bottom three tax brackets (that is, with the residential property market in Tasmania than in other the value of finance commitments to investors fell by 13.4% nation-wide, whereas taxable incomes of $80,000 or less) have rental property states. Even with the continued growth in Tasmania over the the value of lending to home-buyers rose by 1.3%.

income (and less than 59% of them are ‘negatively geared’).

past year, lending to investors accounted for about 23% of

totalThus mortgage in this state, compared with 32% in far,lending however, these developments

And Tasmania relatively high income appear to havehas had littlefewer influence onearners than any other state or territory: only 1.5% of the rest of Australia. demand from, or lending to, property investors in Tasmania. The value of newTasmanian taxpayers are in the tax bracket – less than half lending property investors in Tasmania rose by almost 5%top in income the year ended A much smallerto proportion of Tasmanian taxpayers report the national average of 3.1%.

September (Chart earning rental property income3.9). than taxpayers in any The fact that investors have a smaller presence in the

other state or territory (Chart 3.10) – and of those who do,

Investors have historically accounted for a smaller share of the residential property Tasmanian market than elsewhere in Australia arguably market in Tasmania than in other states. Even with the continued growth in Tasmania means that there is less downside risk to Tasmanian national average of 62%. over the past year, lending to investors accounted for about 23% of total mortgage property prices from either a further tightening in the This almost certainly reflects the fact that property lending in this state, compared with 32% in the restcriteria of Australia. lending applied to property investment loans or less than 55% are ‘negatively geared’, compared with the

investment is more commonly undertaken by high income

from possible changes to the tax treatment of property taxpayers report earning rental property investment than there is in other states. tax bracket (that is, with taxable incomes in excess of state or territory (Chart 3.10) – and of those who income than taxpayers in any other $180,000) have rental property income (and 65% of do, less than 55% are ‘negatively geared’, compared with the national average of 62%.

A much smaller proportion of Tasmanian earners – nationally, almost 35% of taxpayers in the top

Chart 3.9: Value of housing finance commitments to investors 85 80 75 70 65

$mn per month (12-mth moving avge)

$bn per month (12-mth moving avge)

Mainland (right scale) Tasmania (left scale)

60

13 12 11 10 9 8

55

18 16

National average

14 12

7

50 45

6

40

5

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: ABS, Housing Finance (5609.0), September 2018.

42

Chart 3.10: Taxpayers reporting rental property income as pc of total, 2015-16 20 % of total

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

10 8

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

Source: ATO, Taxation Statistics, 2015-16.

NT ACT

The rental housing market The rental housing market in Tasmania has tightened further over the past year.

Hobart’s rental vacancy rate averaged just 1.5% over the year to the September quarter 2018, down from 2.1% over the preceding four quarters and well below the peak of over 4½% in 2012-13. Vacancy rates are higher in other parts of Tasmania but have fallen more rapidly over the past year – from 3.1% to 2.0% in Launceston and from 4.4% to 3.0% on the North West Coast (Chart 3.11).

The ongoing tightening in the rental housing market has resulted in further upward pressure on rents. REIT data indicates that the median rent for 3-bedroom houses in Hobart rose by 9.3% over the year to the September quarter 2018, bringing the cumulative increase over the past two years to almost 17½% (Chart 3.12).

THE RENTAL HOUSING MARKET Chart 3.11: Rental vacancy rates

Chart 3.12: Median rents, 3-bedroom houses

6

450

% (4-quarter moving average)

North-West Coast

5

$ per week (4-quarter moving average)

400 350

4

Launceston

300 3 2 1

Hobart

250 North-West Coast

200

Launceston Hobart 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: REIT, Quarterly Property Report, September 2018.

150

07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: REIT, Quarterly Property Report, September 2018.

The rental housing market in Tasmania has tightened further

growth in household incomes. As a result, the incidence of

over the past year. Hobart’s rental vacancy rate averaged

‘rental housing stress’ has risen substantially over the past

just 1.5% over the year to the September quarter 2018, down

two years.

from 2.1% over the preceding four quarters and well below the peak of over 4½% in 2012-13. Vacancy rates are higher in other parts of Tasmania but have fallen more rapidly over the past year – from 3.1% to 2.0% in Launceston and from 4.4% to 3.0% on the North West Coast (Chart 3.11).

A measure of housing affordability for low-income rental households is compiled by National Shelter, Community Sector Banking and SGS Economics and Planning. It is based on the ratio of median income to the income at which median rent would represent 30% of income (30% of

The ongoing tightening in the rental housing market has

income being the most widely-used threshold for identifying

resulted in further upward pressure on rents. REIT data

housing stress)7.1

indicates that the median rent for 3-bedroom houses in Hobart rose by 9.3% over the year to the September quarter 2018, bringing the cumulative increase over the past two years to almost 17½% (Chart 3.12).

CoreLogic data suggest an even larger increase in Hobart rents, of 14.3% for houses (and 18.8% for units) over the 12 months to October – to the point where the median rent for a 3-bedroom house in Hobart is now higher than in Brisbane, Adelaide or Perth, and on par with Melbourne (Chart 3.13).

By this measure, rental affordability for low income households in Hobart has deteriorated significantly in Hobart over the past three years, and by mid-2018 was the lowest of any capital city (Chart 3.14).

The significant tightening of the rental accommodation market, particularly in Hobart, partly reflects more rapid growth in demand for rental housing as a result of increased population growth. As discussed in more detail in Chapter 4, interstate immigration to Tasmania is running at its fastest

Even on the more conservative REIT data, the increase in

pace since 2004, while the level of overseas migration to

rents in Hobart has been substantially greater than the

Tasmania is now higher than at any time in the last 38 years.

For further details see SGS Economics and Planning, Rental Affordability Index, May 2018.

7

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

43

By this measure, rental affordability for low income households in Hobart has deteriorated significantly in Hobart over the past three years, and by mid-2018 was the lowest of any capital city (Chart 3.13).

The significant tightening of the rental accommodation market, particularly in Hobart, partly reflects more rapid growth in demand for rental housing as a result of increased population growth. As discussed in more detail in Chapter 4, interstate immigration to Tasmania is running at its fastest pace since 2004, while the level of overseas migration to Tasmania is now higher than at any time in the last 38 years.

An increasing proportion of the former are people aged between 20 and 30, while the majority of the MARKET latter are international students: most of both groups are likely to THE RENTAL HOUSING (CONTINUED) be seeking rental accommodation.

Chart 3.13: Median rents, 3-bedroom houses, Hobart and selected mainland cities 550 500 450

$ per week (rolling 3-month median)

Perth

Brisbane

Hobart

Melbourne

400

Chart 3.14: Rental affordability index, Hobart and mainland capitals 130 Index 125

Mainland capitals

120 115

350 110

300 250 200

Adelaide

105 100

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Source: CoreLogic.

Hobart

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Source: SGS Economics & Planning, Rental Affordability Index, November 2018.

An increasing proportion of the former are people aged

In response, the state government has implemented new

between 20 and 30, while the majority of the latter are

monitoring and enforcement provisions aimed at securing

1 international students: most bothEconomics groups are likely be greater Affordability compliance with guidelines originally introduced in For further details seeofSGS andto Planning, Rental Index, November 2018. seeking rental accommodation.

2017 to govern the provision of short-stay accommodation.

This growth in demand has been well in excess of the growth in the supply of rental housing, particularly at the ‘affordable’ end of the market. In addition, it appears likely that the rapid growth in the availability of short-stay tourist accommodation has had an adverse impact on the supply of rental housing, particularly in Hobart.

Research by the University of Tasmania’s Institute for the Study of Social Change suggests that the number of listings across Tasmania on Airbnb increased by more than 160%, from 1,827 in July 2016 to 4,783 in June 2018; that more than 80% of this increase was accounted for by ‘entire properties’ (as opposed to rooms in properties where the owner was also living); and that more than half of this increase in ‘entire property’ listings were of properties which had been booked, or were available, for more than 60 nights a year8.2

It has also undertaken a range of other measures intended to increase the supply of affordable rental housing, including the direct provision of more social housing under its Affordable Housing Strategy, the release of governmentowned land for the construction of housing, and land tax incentives for the construction of new rental housing by private investors.

It will be important for the Government to continue to attach a high priority to ensuring an adequate provision of affordable housing, and to be willing if needed to take further measures to increase housing supply and regulate the conversion of existing properties to short-stay accommodation, not least with a view to ensuring that continued growth in Tasmania’s economy and population is not seen as adversely affecting the living conditions of a growing cohort of existing residents, especially those of limited means.

See University of Tasmania, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Tasmanian Housing Update, August 2018.

8

44

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Chapter 4 TASMANIA’S POPULATION AND SOCIETY Tasmania’s improving economic performance is being mirrored by a pick-up in the growth rate of its population. Although the ‘natural’ growth rate of the population (the difference between births and deaths) is now slowing sharply, more people are moving to Tasmania, from both overseas and interstate, while fewer people are leaving.

This is a very clear demonstration of confidence in Tasmania’s future. It has the potential to create a ‘virtuous circle’ of mutually supportive economic and population growth, including by slowing the rate at which Tasmania’s population will age.

However, it is also important to recognize that although faster population growth will (all else being equal) result in more rapid economic growth (as measured by gross state product), it will not necessarily result in improvements in people’s (material) standards of living (as measured, albeit imperfectly, by per capita gross state product).

Indeed, as the experience of other states demonstrates, rapid population growth can create pressures – most obviously on the availability and affordability of housing, and on the adequacy of economic and social infrastructure – which detract from people’s quality of life (in ways that are not always captured by economic statistics). Responding appropriately to those challenges calls for careful planning and, in all likelihood, higher levels of both private and public investment. Failure to deal adequately with these challenges risks triggering a political backlash against more rapid population growth, in turn detracting from Tasmania’s longer-term economic prospects.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

45

POPULATION GROWTH Tasmania’s population increased by 0.9% in 2017-18, the

Net interstate immigration also added more than 2,000

fastest growth rate since 2008-09, and well above the

people to Tasmania’s population over the year to March

average since the turn of the century of 0.6% per annum

2018, the highest number in 14 years, and representing a

(Chart 4.1). Tasmania’s population grew at a faster rate

dramatic turnaround from earlier this decade when net

than that of Western Australia, South Australia and the

interstate emigration peaked at over 2,000 per annum.

Northern Territory in 2017-18 – the first year in which

The turnaround in net interstate migration largely reflects a

Tasmania hasn’t had the slowest, or second-slowest,

rise in the number of people moving from the mainland to

population growth rate among Australia’s states and

Tasmania – from an average of around 11,000 per annum

territories since 2003-04 (Chart 4.2).

in the early years of this decade to more than 14,000 in the year ended March 2018 (Chart 4.4).

The acceleration in Tasmania’s population growth rate has been driven by a pick-up in both overseas and interstate

The number of people moving from Tasmania to the

migration to Tasmania (Chart 4.3).

mainland has increased marginally over the past couple

Net overseas immigration is now adding around 2,200

of years, to just under 12,000 in the year ended March, but

people annually to Tasmania’s population – the highest

remains below the peak of over 13,000 in the year ended

level on record. A large proportion of the increase in overseas

June 2012.

immigration appears to be of overseas students, so it is

One other important dimension of the turnaround in the

unclear how sustained this increase will be, but for the

flow of people across Bass Strait is its impact on the age

moment it is adding about 0.4 percentage points to the 2

annual growth rate of Tasmania’s population.

Chart 4.1: Population growth, Tasmania and mainland Australia, 2001-02 to 2017-18 2.5 % change from

structure of Tasmania’s population.

Chart 4.2: Population growth, states and territories, 2017-18 2.5

previous year

2.0

Mainland

2.0

1.5 1.0

Tasmania

1.0

0.0

0.5 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 Financial years ended 30 June

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

National average

1.5

0.5

-0.5

% change from previous year

0.0

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

The turnaround in net interstate migration largely reflects a rise in the number of people moving from the mainland to Tasmania – from an average of around 11,000 per annum in the early years of this decade to more than 14,000 in the year ended March 2018 (Chart 4.4).

46

The number of people moving from Tasmania to the mainland has increased marginally TCC I TA S M A over N I A the R E Ppast O R Tcouple 2 0 1 8 of years, to just under 12,000 in the year ended March, but remains below the peak of over 13,000 in the year ended June 2012.

n of the le across ge tion.

cades the nia has ults (and, ry hile the een ear to or d the rate n has st of

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

Financial years ended 30 June Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

NT ACT

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

The turnaround in net interstate migration largely reflects a rise in the number of people moving from the mainland to Tasmania – from an average of around 11,000 per annum in the early years of this decade to more than 14,000 in the year ended March 2018 (Chart 4.4).

The number of people moving from Tasmania to the mainland has increased marginally over the past couple of years, to just under 12,000 in the year ended March, but remains below the peak of over 13,000 in the year ended June 2012.

POPULATION GROWTH (CONTINUED) Chart 4.3: Components of Tasmania’s population growth 4 '000s (4-qtr moving total)

Overseas migration

Natural increase

3

Chart 4.4: Components of net interstate migration to Tasmania 18 '000s (4-qtr moving total) 17 16

2 1

14

0

13 12

-1

11

Interstate migration

-2 -3

From mainland to Tasmania

15

10 9

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

Source: ABS, Australian Demographic Statistics (3101.0), March 2018.

From Tasmania to mainland 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

Source: Australian Demographic Statistics (3101.0), March 2017.

3

Chart 4.5: Net interstate migration to Tasmania, by age group 2.0 000s 1.5

25-49

1.0

Over the past three of four decades the outflow of people from Tasmania has been dominated by young adults (and, in particular, people with tertiary qualifications or trade skills), while the inflow from the mainland has been disproportionately of people near to or in retirement. This has increased the rate at which Tasmania’s population has been ageing, relative to the

50-64

0.5

65+

0.0

rest of Australia’s.

However the largest component of the recent increase in people moving to Tasmania from the mainland

-0.5

0-14

15-24

has been people aged 25-49; while the number of people in this age group and those aged 15-24 has declined (Chart 4.5).

-1.0 -1.5 -2.0

01

03

05

07

09

11

13

nt of the Financial years ended June 30 ing to Source: ABS, Stat-beta. as been number of hose aged 15-24 has declined.

15

age profile of net interstate immigration would have c consequences, at least at the margin – in particular, roportion of Tasmania’s population who are in

17

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

47

POPULATION GROWTH (CONTINUED) If sustained, this change in the age profile of net interstate

Similarly, the proportion of Tasmania’s population aged 65

immigration would have a number of positive economic

or over, currently 19.3% (4 percentage points higher than the

consequences, at least at the margin – in particular, slowing

national average) is expected to rise to 23.9% by 2030 in the

the rate at which the proportion of Tasmania’s population

most recent projections (down from 25.1% previously) and

who are in employment is otherwise likely to decline. To the

24.5% by 2045 (as against 27.2% previously) (Chart 4.7).

extent that people in this age group moving to Tasmania are

This still leaves Tasmania with the oldest population of

bringing with them additional education and skills, it could

any state or territory, and the highest proportion of people

also assist in improving the productivity of Tasmania’s work

aged 65 or over (as well as the smallest proportion aged

force, relative to that of the rest of Australia.

55-64) – but by a smaller margin than implied by the ABS’s

The Statistics Bureau’s most recent median population

previous projections. This largely reflects the incorporation of

projections, based on the results of the 2016 Census, point

more optimistic assumptions about interstate and overseas

to a less rapid ageing of Tasmania’s population than those

migration to Tasmania in the most recent set of projections

based on the previous Census.

than had been included in the earlier set.

The median age of Tasmania’s population, currently 42.2 years (5 years older than the national average), is now projected to reach 42.7 by 2030 (as against 44.3 in the previous projections), and 43.7 years by 2045 (as against 4

46.4 previously) (Chart 4.6).

Chart 4.6: ABS projections of median age, states and territories 46 Years 44

Chart 4.7: ABS projections of population aged 65 and over, states and territories 25 % of total population

20

42 40

15

38 10

36 34

5

32 30

NSW Vic Qld 2017

SA

WA Tas

2030 (p)

NT ACT

2045 (p)

Source: ABS, Population Projections, Australia (3222,0), 2017 (base) to 2066 (Series B).

0

NSW Vic Qld SA 2017

WA Tas

2030 (p)

NT ACT

2045 (p)

ABS, Population Projections, Australia (3222,0), 2017 (base) to 2066 (Series B).

Household income

48

Tasmanian household disposable income per capita rose by 3.4% in 2017-18, the largest increase of any state or territory. This was sufficient to lift Tasmania off the bottom rung of states and territories ranked by per capita household disposable income, a position now occupied (somewhat surprisingly) by Victoria (Chart 4.9). The TCC I TA S ABS M A NState I A R Accounts EPORT 20 18 annual publication suggests that Tasmanian household disposable income per capita is now higher, relative to the national average, than

44

20

42 40

15

38 10

36 34

5

32

30 HOUSEHOLD INCOME NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Tasmanian household disposable income 2017 2030 (p) per capita 2045

(p)

rose by 3.4% in 2017-18, the largest increase of any state or

0

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Primary household income (that income 2045 before(p) interest 2017 2030is,(p) payments, personal income tax payments and social

Source: Projections, Australia territory.

ThisABS, wasPopulation sufficient to lift Tasmania off the(3222,0), bottom 2017 (base) to 2066 (Series B). rung of states and territories ranked by per capita household

ABS, Population Projections, (3222,0), lower 2017 (base) security benefits received) perAustralia capita remained in to 2066 (Series B).

Tasmania than in any other state or territory (including

disposable income, a position now occupied (somewhat

Victoria) in 2017-18, and almost 19% below the national

surprisingly) by Victoria (Chart 4.8). The annual ABS State

average (Chart 4.10). That was largely attributable to

Accounts publication suggests that Tasmanian household

Tasmanian wages and salaries being lower, on average, and

Household income

Tasmanian household disposable income per capita rose by 3.4% in 2017-18, the a smaller proportion of the population being employed, than largest increase of any state or territory.

This was sufficient to lift Tasmania off the elsewhere in Australia, as discussed in Chapter 2. Property the national average, than at any time in the past 18 years bottom rung of states and territories ranked by per capita household disposable income (interest, rent and dividends) per head is also lower (Chart 4.9). income, a position now occupied (somewhat surprisingly) 4.9).

The in Tasmania than inby any Victoria other state (Chart or territory, although annual ABS State Accounts publication suggests that Tasmanian household conversely Tasmanian small business income per head was disposable income per capita is now higher,above relative to theaverage national average, than the national in 2017-18. at any time in the past 18 years (Chart 4.10).

Thousands

disposable income per capita is now higher, relative to

Chart 4.8: Household disposable income per capita, states and territories, 2017-18 100 90

$000 per person, 2017-18

80

50

95

% of national average

90

70 60

Chart 4.9: Tasmanian household disposable income per capita as pc of national average

National average

85

40 30

80

20 10 0

75 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

NT ACT

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 Financial years ended 30 June

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

49

smaller proportion of the population being employed, than elsewhere in Australia, as discussed in Chapter 2. Property income (interest, rent and dividends) per head is also lower in Tasmania than in any other state or territory, although conversely Tasmanian small business income per head was above the national average in 2017-18.

Chart 4.10: Primary household income per capita, states and territories, 2017-18 120 $000 per person, 2017-18 100 80

Other income Property income Small business income Wages & salaries

Thousands

Thousands

However Tasmania remained the only state or territory whose population pay less in personal income tax than they receive by way of social security benefits (Chart 4.12) – reflecting the fact that Tasmania has an above-average share of age and disability pensioners, and a below-average share of high-income taxpayers. And, as noted in Chapter 1, Tasmanian households also have lower interest burdens than HOUSEHOLD INCOME (CONTINUED) households in other states and territories.

Chart 4.11: Personal income tax paid less social security benefits, 2017-18 10 $000 per person, 2017-18 8 6

60

4

40

2

20

0

0

-2

NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

National average

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

Consistent with the improvement in Tasmania’s economic performance over the Ideally, Tasmania’s economic performance will continue to social security benefits paid to Tasmanian improve over the longer term to the point where Tasmanians whose population pay less in personal income tax than households exceeds personal income tax payments by Tasmanian households fallen are paying more in personal income tax than they are they receive by way of social security benefits (Chart 4.11) significantly, from $1,900-$2,200 per head between 2008-09 and 2014-15 to just over receiving in pensions and benefits – as South Australians – reflecting the fact that Tasmania has an above-average $1,000 per head in 2017-18.

However remained only state or territory pastTasmania few years, thethe margin by which

share of age and disability pensioners, and a below-average

have been doing since 2016-17, having previously been in

Ideally, Tasmania’s will continue toTasmanians improveonover the However longer a similar position to this score. share of high-income taxpayers.economic And, as noted performance in Chapter term tohouseholds the point where Tasmanians are paying morerequire in personal than that would a sustainedincome increase intax the proportion of 1, Tasmanian also have lower interest burdens employment, and in productivity. are receiving inand pensions as SouthinAustralians have been doing thanthey households in other states territories. and benefits –Tasmanians since 2016-17, having previously been in a similar position to Tasmanians on this Consistent with the improvement in Tasmania’s economic score. However that would require a sustained increase in the proportion of performance over the past few years, the margin by which Tasmanians in employment, and in productivity. social security benefits paid to Tasmanian households exceeds personal income tax payments by Tasmanian households fallen significantly, from $1,900-$2,200 per head between 2008-09 and 2014-15 to just over $1,000 per head in 2017-18.

50

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

6

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS Socio-economic status

Although the gap between average Tasmanian household

Conversely, only 8.3% of Tasmanians are in the highest SES

Although the gap between average Tasmanian household disposable incomes and quintile – 11.7 percentage points less than if advantage were those in other states and territories has narrowed over the past few years, on a range evenly spread across Australia – while 15.2% were in the has narrowed over the past few years, on a range of other of other indicators (including employment, educational attainment, health status, second-most advantaged SES quintile – 4.8 percentage indicators (including employment, educational attainment, and incidence of disability) set out elsewhere in this Report (oran itseven predecessors) points than if there were spread of social and health status, and incidence of disability) set out elsewhere Tasmanians continue to fare less well, on average, people other states and economicthan advantage (Chartin 4.13). in this Report (or its predecessors) Tasmanians continue territories. to fare less well, on average, than people in other states disposable incomes and those in other states and territories

The proportion of Tasmanians in the lowest two SES

and territories.

quintiles rose by 1.4 percentage points Calculations undertaken by the Commonwealth Grants Commission as between part ofDecember its 2013 (when these estimates were first presented, in the each state and territory government to raise Grants Commission’s 2015 Review) and December 2016, Commission as part of its annual assessments of the revenue from its own resources, and the requirements for expenditure on public while the proportion in the two highest SES quintiles fell capacity of each state and territory government to raise services, indicate that, as at December 2016, 32.6% of Tasmanians are in the most by 0.6 percentage points over the same period. Hopefully revenue from its own resources, and the requirements for disadvantaged socio-economic status (SES) quintile (fifth) of Australians – 12.6 there will have been some improvement when estimates for expenditure on public services, indicate that, as at December percentage points more than would be the case if socio-economic advantage and December 2017 are published in the Grants Commission’s 2016, 32.6% of Tasmanians are in the most disadvantaged disadvantage were evenly spread across the country; while a further 23.6% of next review, due in April 2019. socio-economic status (SES) quintile (fifth) of Australians – are inthan thewould second-most SES quintile – 3.6 percentage 12.6 Tasmanians percentage points more be the case if disadvantaged sociopoints more than if advantage and disadvantage were evenly spread (Chart 4.13). economic advantage and disadvantage were evenly spread Calculations by the Commonwealth Grantsof annualundertaken assessments of the capacity

across the country; while a further 23.6% of Tasmanians

Conversely, only 8.3% of Tasmanians are in the highest SES quintile – 11.7 percentage points less than if advantage were evenly spread across Australia – while 15.2% were percentage points more than if advantage and disadvantage in the second-most advantaged SES quintile – 4.8 percentage points than if there were evenly spread (Chart 4.12). were an even spread of social and economic advantage (Chart 4.14). are in the second-most disadvantaged SES quintile – 3.6

Chart 4.12: Low SES status as a pc of population, December 2016 60 % of population,

Chart 4.13: High SES status as a pc of population, December 2016 90 % of population,

December 2016

80

50

70 60

40

50

30

40 30

20

20

10 0

December 2016

10 0 NSW Vic Qld

SA

2nd most disadvantaged

WA Tas

NT ACT

Most disadvantaged

NSW Vic Qld

SA

2nd least disadvantaged

WA Tas

NT ACT

Least disadvantaged

Source: Commonwealth Grants Commission, Report on GST Revenue-Sharing Relativities – 2018 Review.

The proportion of Tasmanians in the lowest two SES quintiles rose by 1.4 percentage points between December 2013 (when these estimates were first presented, in the Grants Commission’s 2015 Review) and December 2016, while the proportion in the two highest SES quintiles fell by 0.6 percentage points over the same period.

Hopefully there will have been some improvement when estimates for December 2017 are published in the Grants Commission’s next review, due inAApril T C C I TA SM N I A2019.

REPORT 2018

51

HEALTH The past two Tasmania Reports have presented data from

Partly offsetting these findings, the survey also found that

the most recent ABS National Health Survey (conducted

89% of 25-34 year old Tasmanians met NHMRC guidelines

in 2014-15) and the 2016 Census showing that, on most

for ‘moderate’ and/or ‘vigorous’ physical activity, well above

indicators, Tasmanians experience poorer health outcomes

the 61% of all Australians in the 2014-15 NHS.

than any other Australians, with the exception of the Indigenous population.

The St.LukesHealth Survey reported higher levels of a number of chronic conditions among 25-34 year old

The results of a detailed survey of the health status of 25-34

Tasmanians than the corresponding national averages from

year old Tasmanians by St.LukesHealth (a not-for-profit

the 2014-15 NHS – in particular for asthma (29% vs 11%)

Tasmanian-based health insurance fund) undertaken in

and diabetes (6% vs less than 1%).

August-September 2018 and released in November provides further useful insights into the health status of this segment of the state’s population9.1

On the basis of these and other findings St.LukesHealth concludes that “the majority of Tasmanians in this age group can’t or don’t look after their own health, despite recognising

This survey found that only 33% of Tasmanians in this

it could be better”, and that “only appropriate investment in

age group rated their health status as ‘excellent’ or ‘very

evidence-based, locally responsive methods that allow and

good’, compared with 66% of all Australians in the 2014-15

support people to form healthy habits will fix this problem”.

National Health Survey (NHS); while 29% of 25-34 year old Tasmanians rated their health status as ‘fair’ or ‘poor’, compared with just 9% of all Australians in the 2014-15 NHS. Unsurprisingly the proportion of 25-34 year old Tasmanians rating their health status ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ was much higher among those who had not completed Year 12 of schooling (39%) than among those who had attained Year 12 (27%) or who had obtained a tertiary qualification (25%).

The St.LukesHealth Survey found a relatively high incidence of lifestyle risk factors among 25-34 year old Tasmanians: • 25% were smokers (of whom 18% were daily smokers), compared with 20% of all Australians in the 2014-15 NHS; • nearly 26% drank at levels which exposed them to increased lifetime risk of alcohol-related harm on a monthly basis, and a further 19% did so on a weekly basis (the proportion of men in the latter category being 29%); • 52% were either overweight or obese, based on selfassessed height and weight; • 38% met National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for daily fruit consumption (7% less than the average for all Australians in the 2014-15 NHS), while fewer than 8% met the NHMRC guidelines for daily vegetable consumption (marginally above the 2014-15 NHS average);

St.LukesHealth, Tasmanian Health Report – 25 to 34 Year Olds, November 2018.

9

52

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Chapter 5 TASMANIA’S EDUCATION SYSTEM A consistent theme in each of the past three Tasmania Reports has been the importance of achieving higher levels of educational participation and attainment in Tasmania in order to lift participation in employment, the proportion of jobs which are full-time rather than part-time, and labour productivity – the key drivers of per capita gross product and hence of material standards of living – closer to national average levels.

This conclusion continues to be highlighted by the results of the annual ABS surveys of the labour market status of people classified according to their level of educational attainment.

53

in Tasmania in order to lift participation in employment, the proportion of jobs which are full-time rather than part-time, and labour productivity – the key drivers of per capita gross product and hence of material standards of living – closer to national average levels.

This conclusion continues to be highlighted by the results of the annual ABS surveys of the labour market status of people classified according to their level of educational attainment.

The most recent such survey indicates that someone who has completed Year 12 is 55% more likely to have a job than a person who has had 10 years of schooling or less; while someone with any kind of post-secondary qualification is almost 75% more likely to have a job than someone who left school at or before Year 10 (Chart 5.1).

TASMANIA’S EDUCATION SYSTEM The most recent such survey indicates that someone who

Of people with jobs, someone with a post-secondary

Conversely, a person who left school at or before Year 10 is almost 50% more likely to qualification is almost 30% more likely to be employed fullbe unemployed than someone who has completed Year 12, andone more time than someone without (Chartthan 5.3). twice a person who has had 10 years of schooling or less; while as likely to kind be of unemployed as someone who has a post-secondary qualification someone with any post-secondary qualification is Finally, there is a clear correlation between levels of (Chart 5.2).likely to have a job than someone who left almost 75% more has completed Year 12 is 55% more likely to have a job than

educational attainment and productivity in work-places,

school at or before Year 10 (Chart 5.1).

based on what people get paid:issomeone a postOf people with jobs, someone with a post-secondary qualification almostwith 30% secondary qualification (Certificate III/IV or higher) earns, Conversely, a person who left school at or before Year 10 is more likely to be employed full-time than someone without one (Chart 5.3). almost 50% more likely to be unemployed than someone

on average, 52% more than someone with no post-school

thereYear is a correlation levels oforeducational attainment education training (Chart 5.4). whoFinally, has completed 12,clear and more than twice asbetween likely

and people get paid: someone with a postqualification (Chart qualification 5.2). secondary (Certificate III/IV or higher) earns, on average, 52% more than someone with no post-school education or training (Chart 5.4). in work-places, based on what to beproductivity unemployed as someone who has a post-secondary

Chart 5.1: Educational attainment and employment-to-population ratio, May 2018 90 % of civilian population

Chart 5.2: Educational attainment and unemployment rate, May 2018 12 % of civilian labour force

80

10

aged 15-74 Average

70

8

60

6

50

4

40

2

30

Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12 or below

Cert III/IV

Dip / Under- PostAdv grad grad Dip deg- degree ree

Source: ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), May 2018.

54

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

0

aged 15-74

Average

Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12 or below

Cert III/IV

Dip / Under- PostAdv grad grad Dip deg- degree ree

Source: ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), May 2018.

TASMANIA’S EDUCATION SYSTEM (CONTINUED)

Chart 5.3: Educational attainment and fulltime employment as a pc of total, May 2018 80 % of employed persons 75 70

aged 15-74

Chart 5.4: Educational attainment and hourly earnings, August 2017 50 $ per hour

45

Average

40

65

35

60 55

30

50

Average

25

45 40

2

Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12 or below

Cert III/IV

Dip / Under- PostAdv grad grad Dip deg- degree ree

Source: ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), May 2018.

20

No Cert post I/II school quals

Cert DipIII/IV loma/ Adv Dip

Bach- Grad Postelor dip / grad deg- cert degree ree

Source: ABS, Characteristics of Employment (6330.0), August 2017.

Educational attainment in Tasmania Tasmanians are, in general, less well-educated than people living in other parts of Australia.

Only 21.0% of Tasmanians aged 15-74 have a university degree or higher, the lowest proportion of any state or territory (Chart 5.5). However this proportion has risen by 4 percentage points since 2014, narrowing the ‘gap’ with the national average from 7.2 to 6.4 percentage points (Chart 5.6).

Chart 5.5: Population aged 15-75 with bachelor degree or higher, May 2018 50 % of population

Chart 5.6: Population with bachelor degree or higher, Tasmania and Australia, 30 % of population aged 15-74

45

28

aged 15-74

26

40 35 30

(15-64 before 2014)

Australia

24 National average

22

6.4 pc pts

Tasmania

20 18

25

16

20

14

15

12

10

10 NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

02

T C C06 I TA A N I12 A RE R T 218 018 04 08S M10 14P O16

55

25

45 40

Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12 or below

Cert III/IV

Dip / Under- PostAdv grad grad Dip deg- degree ree

Source: ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), May 2018.

20

No Cert post I/II school quals

Cert DipIII/IV loma/ Adv Dip

Bach- Grad Postelor dip / grad deg- cert degree ree

Source: ABS, Characteristics of Employment (6330.0), August 2017.

Educational attainment in Tasmania

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT IN TASMANIA

Tasmanians are, in general, less well-educated than people living in other parts of Australia. territory (Chart 5.5). However this proportion has risen Tasmanians are, in general, less well-educated than people livingOnly in other parts of 21.0% ofAustralia.

Tasmanians

byuniversity 4 percentagedegree points since narrowing ‘gap’ aged 15-74 have a or2014, higher, thethe lowest with the national average from 7.2 to 6.4 percentage of any state territory (Chart 5.5). However this proportion has risen by 4 Onlyproportion 21.0% of Tasmanians aged 15-74or have a university (Chart 5.6). percentage points since of 2014, narrowing thepoints ‘gap’ with the national average from degree or higher, the lowest proportion any state or 7.2 to 6.4 percentage points (Chart 5.6).

Chart 5.5: Population aged 15-75 with bachelor degree or higher, May 2018 50 % of population

Chart 5.6: Population with bachelor degree or higher, Tasmania and Australia, 30 % of population aged 15-74

45

28

aged 15-74

30

24 National average

22

6.4 pc pts

Tasmania

20 18

25

16

20

14

15

12

10

10 NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), May 2018.

56

Australia

26

40 35

(15-64 before 2014)

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

16

18

Source: ABS, ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), annual issues from 2002 through 2018 (note series break in 2014).

3

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT IN TASMANIA (CONTINUED)

Chart 5.7: Population aged 15-75 with no qualifications beyond Year 10, May 2018 30 % of population aged 15-74

25 20

National average

10.1 pc pts

Chart 5.8: Population with no qualifications beyond Year 10, Tasmania and Australia 50 45

% of population aged 15-74 (15-64 before 2014)

40 Tasmania

35 30

15

25 20

10

Australia

15 5

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), May 2018.

10

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

16

18

Source: ABS, ABS, Education and Work (6227.0), annual issues from 2002 through 2018 (note series break in 2014).

Conversely, 28.4% of Tasmanians aged 15-74 have no qualification beyond Year 10, differences in educational attainment between a higher proportion than in any other state orThe territory (Chart 5.7). Although this Tasmania and the rest of Australia are partly the result of qualification beyond Year 10, a higher proportion than in any proportion increased slightly between 2017 and 2018, it has declined by nearly 6 Tasmania’s older age profile, given that, in every state and other state or territory (Chart 5.7). Although this proportion percentage points over the past four years, narrowing the gap with the national territory, younger generations typically have higher levels of increased slightly between 2017 and 2018, it has declined average by almost 2 percentage points (Chart 5.8). educational attainment than successively older generations.

Conversely, 28.4% of Tasmanians aged 15-74 have no

by nearly 6 percentage points over the past four years,

narrowing the gap with the national averageshowed by almost 2that Last year’s Tasmania Report

it is worthinnoting, in this context, that South theHowever differences educational attainment Australia, despite having the second-oldest demographic between Tasmania and the rest of Australia could also not be attributed to the fact profile of any state or territory after Tasmania, has Lastthat year’s Tasmania Tasmania Report showed that the differences lacks a large metropolitan area of the size of any of the mainland higher levels of educational attainment than either of in educational attainment the rest state capitals, orbetween that aTasmania much and larger proportion of Tasmania’s population lives Queensland or Western Australia, both of which have of Australia could not be city. attributed to theon factdata that from the 2016 Census, levels of educational outside its also capital Based younger age profiles.

Tasmania lacks a large area of the size of attainment in metropolitan Hobart were lower than those in nearly all mainland provincial cities They are also partly the result of historical patterns of any of the mainland state capitals, or that a much larger with similar or even somewhat smaller populations; while levels of educational interstate migration, with young Tasmanians who have proportion of Tasmania’s population lives outside its attainment in regional Tasmania were lower than those in the non-metropolitan acquired tertiary qualifications being more likely to move capital city. Based on data from the 2016 Census, levels of areas of each of the mainland states. percentage points (Chart 5.8).

educational attainment in Hobart were lower than those

to the mainland, while those moving to Tasmania from

in nearly mainland provincial cities with similar or even Thealldifferences in educational attainment

the mainland have historically between Tasmania andbeen theolder, restand of hence less likely to have acquired tertiary qualifications.

As noted in somewhat smaller populations; while levels of educational Australia are partly the result of Tasmania’s older age profile, given that, in every Chapter 4, this pattern has begun to change a little over attainment in regional Tasmania were lower than those in state and territory, younger generations typically have higher levels of educational the past two years. the non-metropolitan areas of each of the mainland states. attainment than successively older generations.

However it is worth noting, in this context, that South Australia, despite having the second-oldest demographic profile of any state or territory after Tasmania, has higher levels of educational attainment than either of Queensland or Western Australia, both of which have younger age profiles.

They are also partly the result of historical patterns of interstate migration, with young Tasmanians who have acquired tertiary qualificationsTbeing more move to2 0 1 8 C C I TA S M Alikely N I A to RE PORT the mainland, while those moving to Tasmania from the mainland have historically

57

PARTICIPATION IN SENIOR SECONDARY EDUCATION The single most important reason for an above-average

Apparent retention rates are based on enrolment figures

proportion of Tasmanians having no qualifications beyond

– that is, the number of students enrolled in (in this case,

Year 10 of high school, and a below-average proportion having a university qualification, is the persistently belowaverage rates of participation in, and completion of, senior

4 Year 12) courses at the beginning of each year. They do not convey any information about the extent to which students

successfully complete the courses in which they enrol.

Participation in senior secondary education Tasmania’s Year 12 completion rate - the number of

secondary school (Years 11 and 12) by comparison with the rest of Australia.

students who meet the requirements of a Year 12 Certificate

The single most important reason for an above-average proportion of Tasmanians or equivalent expressed as a percentage of the potential A smaller proportion of Tasmanian Year 10 students having no qualifications beyond Year 10 of high school, and a below-average Year 12 population (in turn defined as one fifth of the continue their studies on to Year 12 than of those in proportion having ispopulation the persistently below-average rates of aged 15-19) – reached 60% in 2016, the latest any other state or the ACT – orainuniversity the Northernqualification, Territory participation in, and completion of, senior secondary school (Years 11 and 12) by year for which directly comparable data for all states and if the Indigenous population is excluded from the comparison with the rest of Australia. territories are publicly available (Chart 5.12). This is the comparison (Chart 5.9).

Tasmania’s apparent retention rate to Year 12 has been A smaller proportion of Tasmanian Year

highest figure since the commencement of the new

10 students continue their studies on to Year TCE in 2009. rising over the past decade, but remains lower than it was 12 than of those in any other state or the ACT – or in the Northern Territory if the Data published by the Office of Tasmanian Assessment, in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Chart 5.10). Moreover Indigenous population is excluded from the comparison (Chart 5.9). retention rates have been rising elsewhere in Australia –

Standards and Certification (TASC) puts Tasmania’s 2016

completion rate at 56%, over slightlythe below that published by the mostTasmania’s noticeably in South Australia,retention the state whose apparent ratesocioto Year 12 has been rising past decade, economic profile is closest to Tasmania’s: South but remains lower than it was in Australia’s the late

Productivity Commission, increasing5.10). further to 59% in 2017.

1990s and early 2000s (Chart While this suggests an ongoing improvement in Tasmania’s elsewhere in Australia – most noticeably in Year 12 completion rate, it remains well below those of other points since 2009, and is now second only to that of the South Australia, the state whose socio-economic profile is closest to Tasmania’s: jurisdictions, with the exception of the Northern Territory. (much more affluent) ACT. South Australia’s Year 12 retention rate has risen by more than 14 percentage points since 2009, and is now second only to that of the (much more affluent) ACT. YearMoreover 12 retention rate has risen by more than 14 percentage retention rates have been rising

Chart 5.9: Apparent retention rates from Year 10 to 12, states and territories, 2017 95

Chart 5.10: Apparent retention rates from Year 10 to 12, Tasmania and Australia, 1990-2017

90

85

%

85 80 75

National average

90

%

Australia

80 75 70

11.8 pc pts

65

Tasmania

60 55

70

50 65 60

45 40 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Note: ‘x’ is the value for the non-Indigenous population of the NT. Source: ABS, Schools (4221.0), 2016.

58

90 93 96 99 02 05 08 11 14 17

Source: ABS, Schools (4221.0), 2016.

Apparent retention rates are based on enrolment figures – that is, the number of students enrolled in (in this case, Year 12) courses at the beginning of each year.

They about the extent to which students successfully TCC I TAdo S Mnot A Nconvey I A R E P any O R Tinformation 2018 complete the courses in which they enrol.

PARTICIPATION IN SENIOR SECONDARY EDUCATION 5 (CONTINUED)

Chart 5.11: Year 12 completion rates, Tasmania and Australia 80

%

Chart 5.12: Year 12 completion rates, states and territories, 2016 100 %

Australia

75

90

70 65

Tasmania (RoGS data)

60 55

average 16 pc pts

70 TASC data

50

National

80

45

60 50

40 40

35

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

17

NT ACT

Source: Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services, 2018, Volume B, Chapter 4, School Education; Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification (TASC), Rates of Attainment 2017.

Data published by the Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification (TASC) puts Tasmania’s 2016 completion rate at 56%, slightly below that published by the Productivity Commission, increasing further to 59% in 2017. While this suggests an ongoing improvement in Tasmania’s Year 12 completion rate, it remains well below those of other jurisdictions, with the exception of the Northern Territory.

Helping you stay healthy, Tasmania’s relatively low Year 12 completion rates are undoubtedly influenced to well and students some extent by the fact that an above-average get proportion of Tasmanian come from lower-SES households (as noted in Chapter live4).better.

Just and one reason why our2014-16 Chart 5.13: Year 12 completion rates by SES status, States Territories,

High 100

%

90

National average

80 70

40

members voted us number one for customer satisfactionLow in Australia, two years in a row!*

National Alastair Lynch average Former AFL Player | Director, HBP Group 18 pc pts

10 pc pts

60 50

Medium

National average 23 pc pts

We’re your number one health insurer. Talk to us today!

1300 651 988

for Customer Satisfaction* two years in a row!

stlukes.com.au

30

* #1 Roy Morgan Customer Satisfaction Awards: Private Health Insurer of the Year – 2016 & 2017. St.LukesHealth ABN 81 009 479 618

180941

20 10

NSWVicQld SA WA Tas NT ACT

NSWVic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT NSWVic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Note: Low socio-economic status (SES) is the average of the three lowest deciles, medium SES is the average of the

59

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Source: Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services, 2018, Volume B, Chapter 4, School Education; Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification (TASC), Rates of Attainment 2017.

Data published by the Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification (TASC) puts Tasmania’s 2016 completion rate at 56%, slightly below that published by the Productivity Commission, increasing further to 59% in 2017. While this suggests an ongoing improvement in Tasmania’s Year 12 completion rate, it remains well below those of other jurisdictions, with the exception of the Northern Territory.

Tasmania’s relatively low Year 12 completion rates are undoubtedly influenced to

(CONTINUED) PARTICIPATION IN SENIOR SECONDARY EDUCATION some extent by the fact that an above-average proportion(CONTINUED) of Tasmanian students

come from lower-SES households (as noted in Chapter 4).

Chart 5.13: Year 12 completion rates by SES status, States and Territories, 2014-16 High 100 90 80 70 60 50

Medium

Low

% National average

National average

National average

18 pc pts

10 pc pts

23 pc pts

40 30 20 10

NSWVicQld SA WA Tas NT ACT

NSWVic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT

NSWVic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT

Note: Low socio-economic status (SES) is the average of the three lowest deciles, medium SES is the average of the four middle deciles and high SES is the average of the three highest deciles. Source: Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services, 2018, Volume B, Chapter 4, School Education, Table 4A.55.

Tasmania’s relatively low Year 12 completion rates are

However this is far from a complete explanation. As shown

undoubtedly influenced to some extent by the fact that an

in Chart 5.13, Tasmanian students in each SES category are

above-average proportion of Tasmanian students come

less likely to complete Year 12 than their counterparts in

from lower-SES households (as noted in Chapter 4).

other states and territories – with the exceptions of students from high SES backgrounds in Western Australia and those from low SES backgrounds in the Northern Territory. In particular, a student from a high-SES household in Tasmania has, over the past three years, been less likely to complete Year 12 than a student from a low-SES household on the mainland, on average.

60

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

IS TASMANIA SPENDING ‘ENOUGH’ ON SCHOOL EDUCATION? Again the contrast with South Australia is particularly

It may seem tempting to suggest that Tasmania’s below-

striking. As shown in Charts 4.12 and 4.13 in the previous

average levels of educational participation and attainment

Chapter, South Australia has the second-highest

could be improved simply by spending more on school

concentration of low socio-economic status households,

education. Yet this is not supported by a comparison of

and the second-lowest concentration of high socio-

levels of school education in Tasmania with that in other

economic status households, of any state or territory after

jurisdictions.

Tasmania. Despite this apparent disadvantage – given that

In the 2016-17 financial year, the Tasmanian government

there is typically some relationship between socio-economic

spent just over $15,000 per full-time equivalent student on

status and education outcomes – South Australia has the

school education, almost $2,700 per FTE student (or 22%)

highest Year 12 completion rate of any state or territory.

more than the average for all states and territories, and more

It is more likely that the ‘causation’ runs the other way round

than any other jurisdiction except the Northern Territory

from how it has often been portrayed – that is, Tasmania’s

(Chart 5.14). This was equivalent to 4.1% of Tasmania’s gross

historically low levels of educational participation and

state product in 2015-16, more than for any other state or

attainment are an important reason (albeit not the only

territory, and some 1.4 pc points above the average for all

one) why a higher proportion of Tasmanian households than

states and territories (Chart 5.15).

of households in other states fall into the lowest socioeconomic status, rather than the latter ‘causing’ the former.

7

Chart 5.14: Government spending on school education per FTE student, 2016-17 20

Chart 5.15: Government spending on school education as a pc of GSP, 2016-17 4.5 % of gross state product,

18

4.0

$000 per FTE student, 2016-17

+$2,705

16 14

2016-17

3.5 3.0

National average

12

2.5

10

2.0

8

1.5

6

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

+1.4 pc pts

NT ACT

Sources: ABS, Government Finance Statistics, Education, (5518.0.55.001), 2016-17; and Schools (4221.0), 2017.

1.0

National average

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, Government Finance Statistics, Education, (5518.0.55.001), 2016-17; and State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

One of the reasons why Tasmania spends more on education, without getting commensurately better results, is the relatively small size of Tasmanian schools.

Tasmanian government schools had an average of 295 FTE students each in 2017, fewer than those in any other state (on average), and well below the national average of 379 students per government school.

Chart 5.16: Average government school sizes, states and territories, 2017

More detailed compiled T C C I TAdata SMAN I A R E P Oby R Tthe 2018 Productivity Commission show that

61

6

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Sources: ABS, Government Finance Statistics, Education, (5518.0.55.001), 2016-17; and Schools (4221.0), 2017.

1.0

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: ABS, Government Finance Statistics, Education, (5518.0.55.001), 2016-17; and State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

One of the reasons why Tasmania spends more on education, without getting commensurately better results, is the relatively small size of Tasmanian schools.

Tasmanian government schools had an average of 295 FTE students each in 2017, fewer than those in any other state (on average), and well below the national IS TASMANIA SPENDING ‘ENOUGH’ ON SCHOOL EDUCATION? (CONTINUED) average of 379 students per government school.

This is broadly the Commonwealth Chart 5.16: consistent Averagewith government schoolGrants sizes,

More detailed data compiled by the More detailed data compiled by the Productivity

determination of GST revenue-sharing relativities that 500 Number

relatively few large primary schools (with this is because Tasmania has more than 400

than 450it would need to in order to provide ‘the same standard

schools fewer than 300students), students), and (with (with more than 400 arelatively few

Commission’ part of its most recent states andassessment, territories,as 2017

Tasmania(2016-17) spends about 5% more on school education of service’ as the average of all states and territories, National

Productivity show thathas Commission showCommission that this is because Tasmania

students), a relatively large number of small secondary relatively few large primary schools

large secondary schools (with more than 800 students).

and the socio-economic status of students’ families1.

relatively large number of small secondary (with fewer than Smaller schools schools will typically have higher overhead and costs (eg for school leaders, administrative, 300fixed students), and relatively few large support and maintenance permore studentthan than larger secondary schoolsstaff) (with schools.

However, in the Tasmanian context, there is no 800 students).

One 250of the reasons why Tasmania spends more on

Smaller schools student outcomes.

400taking account of differences average after in factors such as the proportion of the population which is of school age, the

350 proportion of students attending government schools, the proportion of students living in provincial or remote areas,

300

education, without getting commensurately better results,

is200 the relatively small size of Tasmanian schools. Tasmanian government schools had an average of 295 FTE students

150

each in 2017, fewer than those in any other state (on average), and well below the national average of 379

100

students per government school.

NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

Source: ABS, Schools (4221,0), 2017,

NT ACT

evidence to suggest that smaller schools produce better

will typically have higher overhead and fixed costs (eg for school leaders, administrative, support and maintenance staff) per student than larger schools. However, in the Tasmanian context, there is no evidence to suggest that smaller schools produce better student outcomes.

Commonwealth Grants Commission, 2018 Update, April 2018, Supplementary Information, Tables S7-3 and S7-4. .

1

62

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

TASMANIA’S COLLEGE SYSTEM The most obvious and substantial structural difference

It also means that students who do go on to Years 11 and

between the government school system in Tasmania and

12 at a college lose contact with subject teachers and

elsewhere in Australia is that Year 11 and 12 courses have

other staff who have come to know their strengths and

(since the 1960s) been provided through ‘colleges’, separate

weaknesses over their first four years of high school, and

from high schools which in Tasmania, unlike other states,

have to ‘start again’ with college staff who will only have

have traditionally only catered for Years 7 through 10. The

two years to achieve the same insights – and who are

only other jurisdiction which provides senior secondary

themselves ‘starting from scratch’ with their new intakes

education through separate colleges is the ACT – which, as

each year.

shown throughout this Report, is economically, culturally and in almost every other way more different from Tasmania than any other part of Australia.

And it has historically meant that students from other than the four centres where the colleges are located have had to commute long distances, or board, in order to complete

There is no compelling evidence that Tasmania’s colleges

Years 11 and 12 – which have often turned out to be

provide an inferior quality of senior secondary education

insurmountable hurdles.

to the students who attend them than the comprehensive systems in other states.

During its first term in office, the Hodgman Government extended Year 11 and 12 courses to all high schools outside

However, Tasmania’s college system does appear to be a relatively more expensive way of providing Year 11

of the four major metropolitan centres (where the colleges 9 are located).

and 12 courses.

The average cost per TCE graduate across Tasmania’s eight senior secondary colleges in 2016 (using the most recent financial data published on the MySchool website) was about $46,700 – almost $10,000 (or 27%) more than the equivalent figure for 13 South Australian high schools whose students come from a similar range of socio-economic

During Hodg exten to all h four m (wher

Chart 5.17: Year 12 completion rates at ‘extension’ high schools, 2012-2017 50

% of students enrolled 2 years earlier

45

status backgrounds to those attending Tasmania’s colleges; and about $4,000 or 9% more than the average for five

40

Tasmanian independent schools .

10 2

The separate college system has also led to the existence

35

of a number of obstacles confronting students who might otherwise have been more likely to progress all the way to Year 12, obstacles which do not exist in the integrated high

30

school systems of mainland states.

In particular, the ‘structural break’ in the Tasmanian

25

education system at Year 10 means that students in Years 7 through 10 at government high schools do not come into regular contact with Year 11 and 12 students who can serve

20

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

as ‘role models’ for them, inspiring them to see Year 12 as the appropriate ‘exit point’ from schooling, rather than Year 10.

Source: Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification (TASC), Attainment Profiles and Direct Continuation Data, 2018.

46% o schoo in 201 enrolle who a an inc points increa in the Tasma ‘exten

The G to ext to hig during

These calculations were made using the same methods and assumptions as in Michael Rowan and Eleanor Ramsay, ‘Tasmanian Colleges – Fit for the Purpose of Post-Compulsory Schooling?’ Education Ambassadors, 2014, and Submission to the State ultimate of Tasmania Years 9-12are The August Hodgman Government’s aims Education Review: Attachment 1, Australian Council for Educational Research, September 2016.

10

to lift Tasm rate to at least the national average, and the TCE comp It believes that these goals can be accomplished by high working ‘in partnership’, as a number of them already do T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

63

However, retaining the existing colleges as separate instit

TASMANIA’S COLLEGE SYSTEM (CONTINUED) 46% of students enrolled in these schools in 2015 attained

As last year’s Tasmania Report argued, if the college system

their TCE in 2017, up from 29% of those enrolled in these

really has done such a stellar job of educating Tasmanian

schools in 2010 who attained their TCE in 2012 – an increase

students in the senior secondary years over the past five

of 17 percentage points, compared with an increase of 11

decades, why is it that no other state has seen fit to copy it

percentage points in the completion rate for all Tasmanian

(other than the ACT which, as argued earlier, might as well

schools (including the ‘extension schools’) (Chart 5.17).

be Mars for all the relevance its circumstances

The Government has committed to extend Year 11 and 12

have to Tasmania)?

courses to high schools in urban areas during its second

Once again South Australia provides an instructive counter-

term in office.

example. South Australia has in recent years been the only

The Hodgman Government’s ultimate aims are to lift Tasmania’s Year 12 retention rate to at least the national average, and the TCE completion rate to 75%, by 2022.

It believes that these goals can be accomplished by high schools and colleges working ‘in partnership’, as a number of them already do.

However, retaining the existing colleges as separate institutions, as the Government envisages, seems likely to entail a higher on-going cost than a fully integrated system such as those operating in every other state.

state where Year 7 forms part of primary school, rather than high school. However the newly-elected Liberal Government of Premier Steve Marshall has committed, in its first Budget, to transitioning Year 7s in public schools from primary to secondary schools by 2022, in recognition of “the experience of other states showing that Year 7s thrive in a high school setting”, and so as “to improve the long-term educational outcomes for South Australian students”3.2 If South Australia – whose education system, as noted previously in this Chapter, typically produces above-average student outcomes despite having a socio-economic profile closer to Tasmania’s than any other state or territory – sees merit in bringing the structure of its education system more into line with that of the rest of Australia’s, why shouldn’t Tasmania?

Government of South Australia, 2018-19 Budget Paper No 1, p. 8.

3

64

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

bringing the structure of its education system more into line with that of the rest of Australia’s, why shouldn’t Tasmania?

Tasmania’s vocational education and training (VET) system By contrast with its senior secondary system, Tasmania’s vocational education and training system appears to compare favourably in a number of respects with those of other states and territories.

Data assembled by the Productivity CommissionEDUCATION indicate that a higher proportion of TASMANIA’S VOCATIONAL 18-24 year old Tasmanians participate in VET programs than of the same age group AND (VET) SYSTEM in any TRAINING other jurisdiction except the Northern Territory (Chart 5.20); and that the

proportion of VET graduates who believe that their training helped them achieve Tasmanian also report higher levels of By contrast with itsreason senior secondary system, Tasmania’s their main for undertaking it is also well aboveemployers the national average (Chart engagement with the VET system than employers in any vocational education and training system appears to 5.21). compare favourably in a number of respects with those of

other state (Chart 5.20). And they appear to be generally

who believe that their training helped them achieve their

some employers are encountering shortages of suitably

Tasmanian employers also report higher levels ofsatisfied engagement withforms the ofVET more with the various VETsystem training than other states and territories. than employers in any other state (Chart 5.22). they appear be generally theirAnd counterparts elsewhere to in Australia (Chart 5.21), Data assembled by the Productivity Commission indicate although within the proportionelsewhere of Tasmanian more satisfied with the various forms of VET training thanthese theirtotals counterparts that a higher proportion of 18-24 year old Tasmanians employers satisfied withof apprenticeship or in Australia (Chart 5.23), although within these totals who theare proportion Tasmanian participate in VET programs than of the same age group traineeship programs is lower than the national average. employers who arethe satisfied apprenticeship or traineeship programs is lower in any other jurisdiction except Northern with Territory than the national average.

Despite these generally favourable comparisons, however, (Chart 5.18); and that the proportion of VET graduates Despite these generally favourable comparisons, however, some employers are skilled employees, particularly in construction-related trades. main reason for undertaking it is also well above the encountering shortages of suitably skilled employees, particularly in constructionnational average (Chart 5.19). related trades.

Chart 5.18: Participation of 18-24 year olds in government-funded VET programs, 2017 25 % of 18-24 year olds, 2017

20

Chart 5.19: Proportion of VET graduates achieving main reason for training, 2017 92 90

National average

% of government-funded graduates, 2017

88 86

15

84 10

National average

82 80

5

78 0

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

76

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services, 2018, Volume B, Chapter 5, Vocational Education and Training.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

65

11

TASMANIA’S VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (VET) SYSTEM (CONTINUED)

Chart 5.20: Employer engagement with VET programs, 2017 60 % of employers

Chart 5.21: Employer satisfaction with VET programs, 2017 76 % of employers 'satisfied'

58

75

2017

National average

56

2017

74 73

54

72

52

National average

71

50

70

48

69

46

68 NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

NSW Vic Qld SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Source: Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services, 2018, Volume B, Chapter 5, Vocational Education and Training.

Those pressures may become more intense if the level of residential, commercial and engineering construction activity continues to grow.

Those pressures may become more intense if the level of

residential, commercial and engineering construction activity

The broader role of education

continues to grow.

The importance of achieving higher levels of educational participation and attainment does not derive exclusively from the contribution that doing so can make towards better economic outcomes. Higher levels of educational attainment would also contribute towards improving the health status of Tasmanians, not least by enabling them to make better ‘lifestyle choices’ than the ones documented in the last section of Chapter 4.

More broadly, as the University of Tasmania puts it in its most recent Strategic Direction statement, “sustainable social, economic and cultural progress requires ever higher levels of capability and constant discovery to solve the complex problems and questions that we face” … Today, education, knowledge and creative productions are critical to future social and economic wellbeing, and even more so in an island setting with a small population. In a world where globalisation favours large, globally connected metropolitan areas, regional economies will always have to work harder to find the distinctive sources of advantage that are needed to generate wealth, services and infrastructure required to support a decent quality of life here”4.

66

The need for ‘ever high levels of capability’ and the quest for ‘distinctive sources of advantage’ are challenges which confront all sections of the Tasmanian community.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

THE BROADER ROLE OF EDUCATION The importance of achieving higher levels of educational participation and attainment does not derive exclusively from the contribution that doing so can make towards better economic outcomes. Higher levels of educational attainment would also contribute towards improving the health status of Tasmanians, not least by enabling them to make better ‘lifestyle choices’ than the ones documented in the last section of Chapter 4.

More broadly, as the University of Tasmania puts it in its most recent Strategic Direction statement, “sustainable social, economic and cultural progress requires ever higher levels of capability and constant discovery to solve the complex problems and questions that we face” … Today, education, knowledge and creative productions are critical to future social and economic wellbeing, and even more so in an island setting with a small population. In a world where globalisation favours large, globally connected metropolitan areas, regional economies will always have to work harder to find the distinctive sources of advantage that are needed to generate wealth, services and infrastructure required to support a decent quality of life here”4.3 The need for ‘ever high levels of capability’ and the quest for ‘distinctive sources of advantage’ are challenges which confront all sections of the Tasmanian community.

University of Tasmania, Strategic Direction, November 2018, p. 2.

4

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

67

68

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Chapter 6 TASMANIA’S PUBLIC SECTOR

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

69

SIZE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR Chapter 6: Tasmania’s public sector The size of Tasmania’s state public sector partly reflects the

Tasmania has a relatively large state public sector. At the end of the 2017-18 financial year, the assets of the state

relatively greater importance of its government business

non-financial public sector had a value equivalent to 86%

enterprises (GBEs), whose assets at the end of 2017-

of Tasmania’s gross state product (GSP) for the year, a

18 were worth 35% of gross state product, and whose

Size of the public sector

Tasmania has a relatively large state public sector.

At the end of the 2017-18 ‘operating expenses’ represented 11% of GSP in 2017-18 – in year,forthe assets the state non-financial sector value wellfinancial above the average all states andof territories of 73% each casepublic higher than for anyhad othera state or territory, and equivalent to 86% of Tasmania’s gross state product (GSP) for the year, a larger 13 1 (Chart 6.1) . Tasmanian state non-financial public sector well above the averages for all states and territories of 15.7% figureexpenses’ than for any other state except Queensland, and above the average for and 3.4% of GSP,well respectively. ‘operating in 2017-18 were equivalent to almost 1. Tasmanian state non-financial public all states and territories of 73% (Chart 6.1) 29% of gross state product, a larger proportion than in any other state or ‘operating territory, and well above the average of 15.7%were equivalent to almost 29% of gross state sector expenses’ in 2017-18 for all states and territories (Chart 6.2). product, a larger proportion than in any other state or territory, and well above the average of 15.7% for all states and territories (Chart 6.2). larger figure than for any other state except Queensland, and

Chart 6.1: State non-financial public sector assets as a pc of GSP, 30 June 2018 100 80

Chart 6.2: State non-financial public sector operating expenses as a pc of GSP, 2017-18 35

% of GSP

% of GSP

30

National average

25

60

20 15

40

National average

10 20 0

5 0 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT

Sources: State and Territory Treasuries, Annual Financial Reports (or equivalents), 2017-18, except for Queensland and South Australia, 2018-19 Budget Papers; ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2018-19.

The size of Tasmania’s state public sector partly reflects the relatively greater importance of its government business enterprises (GBEs), whose assets at the end of 2017-18 were worth 35% of gross state product, and whose ‘operating expenses’ represented 11% of GSP in 2017-18 – in each case higher than for any other state or territory, and well above the averages for all states and territories of 15.7% and 3.4% of GSP, respectively.

Tasmania’s ‘general government’ sector (that is, the ‘core’ departments and agencies) was also larger than that of most other states and territories, with assets valued at the equivalent of 66% of GSP in 2017-18 (higher than in any other state The value of assets owned by the entire Tasmanian state public sector, including the Tasmanian Public Finance Corporation (Tascorp) Queensland, and the Territories), and ‘operating expenses’ andexcept the Motor Accident Insurance Board (which are two classified as public financial corporations) was equivalent to almost amounting 100% of GSP as at the end of 2017-18 to 19.4% of GSP (higher than for any other jurisdiction except the Northern Territory, and well above the average for all states and territories of 13.6%).

13

70

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 1 The value of assets owned by the entire Tasmanian state public sector, including the Tasmanian Public

SIZE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR (CONTINUED)

2

Chart 6.3: State public sector employment as a pc of total employment, 2017-18 25

% of total employment, 2017-18

departments agencies) was also larger than that of relativelyand large employer,

most other states and assets valued at the accounting forterritories, 17% of with total equivalent of 66% ofin GSP in 2017-18 (higher than in any employment Tasmania in 2017-18 other state except and the two territories), – more thanQueensland, in any jurisdiction and ‘operating expenses’ amounting to 19.4% of GSP

except the Northern Territory, and 4½ percentage points above the Territory, and well above the average for all states and average for all states and territories territories of 13.6%).

(Chart 6.3).

20

15

The state public sector sector is also(that a is, the ‘core’ Tasmania’s ‘general government’

(higher than for any other jurisdiction except the Northern

Average of all states & territories

The state public sector is also a relatively large employer,

The Commonwealth Government is in accounting for 17% of total employment in Tasmania

also –amore larger in Tasmania 2017-18 thanemployer in any jurisdiction except the Northern

10

than and in any other state, Territory, 4½ percentage points accounting above the average for all states and territories (Chart 6.3). for 2.2% of total employment

5

0

NSW Vic

Qld

SA

WA

Tas

NT

ACT

– although this isGovernment a smaller figure than The Commonwealth is also a larger employer for the Northern Territory or in Tasmania than in any other state, accounting for 2.2% but unsurprisingly) thefigure than of (especially, total employment – although this is a smaller forACT. the Northern Territory or (especially, but unsurprisingly) the ACT.

Local government, on the other hand, accounts for just 1.7% of total of total employment in Tasmania, which is only marginally employment in Tasmania, which is above the national average of 1.5%. only marginally above the national average of 1.5%.

Source: ABS, Employment and Earnings, Public Sector, Australia, 6248.0.55.002), 2017-18.

Local government, on the other hand, accounts for just 1.7%

Financial position and performance of Tasmania’s public sector Except for its very large unfunded superannuation liability – on which more below – the Tasmanian public sector is in a relatively strong financial position.

Tasmania is one of only two jurisdictions where the ‘general government’ sector is a net creditor (Chart 6.4)– and the other, New South Wales, will be in this position only temporarily, whereas Tasmania’s general government sector is projected to remain a net creditor throughout the current forward estimates period, which ends in 202122 (Chart 6.5), albeit to a much smaller extent than projected a year previously, as a result of the greater run-down in net cash balances required to fund the Government’s election commitments.

Tasmania’s GBEs have a relatively large amount of debt - equivalent in 2017-18 to just under 7½% of gross state product, more than any other state or territory except Queensland, and well above the average of 5½% of GSP for all states and territories – largely as a result of the fact that, as noted earlier, they also have a lot of assets.

Despite this, because Tasmania’s general government sector is a net creditor, Tasmania’s total non-financial public sector debt is lower, as a proportion of gross product, than that of any other state or territory except New South Wales (Chart 6.6), and on the most recent state budget projections will remain below the average for all states and territories through 2021-22 (Chart 6.7).

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

71

FINANCIAL POSITION AND PERFORMANCE OF TASMANIA’S PUBLIC SECTOR Except for its very large unfunded superannuation liability –

whereas Tasmania’s general government sector is projected to

on which more below – the Tasmanian public sector is in a

remain a net creditor throughout the current forward estimates

relatively strong financial position.

period, which ends in 2021-22 (Chart 6.5), albeit to a much smaller extent than projected a year previously, as a result of

Tasmania is one of only two jurisdictions where the ‘general government’ sector is a net creditor (Chart 6.4)– and the other, New South Wales, will be in this position only temporarily,

Chart 6.4: ‘General government’ net debt as a pc of GSP, 30 June 2018 10 % of GSP 8 6

3

the greater run-down in net cash balances required to fund the Government’s election commitments.

Chart 6.5: ‘General government’ net debt, Tasmania and all states & territories 6 % of GSP

4

Average of all states & territories

All States & Territories

2

4

0

2 -2

0 -2 -4

-6 NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Chart 6.6: State non-financial public sector net debt as a pc of GSP, 30 June 2018 16 % of GSP 14 12

07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Chart 6.7: State non-financial public sector net debt, Tasmania and all states & territories 12

% of GSP

All States & Territories

8

8

6

6

4

4

2

2

0 NSW Vic Qld

Forward estimates

Financial years ended 30 June

10

Average of all states & territories

10

0

Tasmania

-4

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

Tasmania Forward estimates

07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Financial years ended 30 June

Sources: State and Territory Treasuries, Annual Financial Reports (or equivalents), 2017-18, except for Queensland and South Australia; 2018-19 Budget Papers; ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

72

The improvement in the financial position of Tasmania’s general government sector spending since 2010-11, and stronger growth in revenues since 2013-14.

TCC I TA S M A N I A control R E P O Rover T 2 0government 18 reflects greater

4

FINANCIAL POSITION AND PERFORMANCE OF TASMANIA’S PUBLIC SECTOR (CONTINUED)

Chart 6.8: Tasmanian general government operating revenue and expenses 8 % pa 'Operating' revenue

7

'Operating' expense

6

Chart 6.9: Tasmanian general government ‘net operating’ and fiscal balances 300 $mn Net operating 200 balance Fiscal 100 0

5

-100

4 Forward estimates

3

-200 -300

2

-400

1

-500

0

balance

-600 2010-11 2014-15 2018-19 2001-02 to 2009-10 to 2013-14 to 2017-18 to 2021-22

Forward estimates

'Underlying' net operating balance

07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Financial years ended 30 June

Note: The net operating balance for 2016-17 shown in Chart 6.9 excludes the one-off payment of $740mn from the Australian Government accompanying the transfer of the Mersey Community Hospital. The ‘underlying’ net operating balance excludes this and other one-off Australian Government capital funding (such as for the Royal Hobart Hospital re-development, and various roads projects). The fiscal balance includes net purchases of non-financial assets.

Sources: Tasmanian Government, Budget Paper No. 1, 2018-19 and previous years; Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, 2017-18.

Importantly, holding growth in spending to less than the growth in revenues has Growth in ‘operating expenses’ has been held to an average allowed the Government’s ‘net operating balance’ to return to surplus: and that of just over 4% pa since 2013-14, up from 2½% pa over - equivalent in 2017-18 to just under 7½% of gross state surplus is projected to increase over the forward estimates period out to 2021-22 the previous four years but well down on the growth rate product, more than any other state or territory except (Chart 6.9), which is in turn helping to financeof higher levels of infrastructure almost 7% pa over the decade before that (Chart 6.8).

Queensland, and well above the average of 5½% of GSP for investment.

(Note the operating balance’ as published in the has State Budget Meanwhile ‘operating revenue’ grown at an average all states and territories – largely as‘net a result of the fact that, Papers includes about $177mn pa of Commonwealth Government grants for capital annual rate of 5¼% pa over the past four years, up from less as noted earlier, they also have a lot of assets. purposes which accounting conventions treat as3½% ‘operating excluding than pa betweenrevenues’; 2010-11 and 2013-14.

Despite this, because Tasmania’s general government sector these the ‘underlying’ operating balance will record small deficits over the forward Importantly, holding growth in spending to less than the is a net creditor, Tasmania’s total non-financial public estimates period). growth in revenues has allowed the Government’s ‘net sector debt is lower, as a proportion of gross product, than Tasmania’s GBEs have a relatively large amount of debt

operating balance’ to return to surplus: and that surplus is More than half of the growth in the State Government’s operating revenues over the projected to increase over the forward estimates period out past four years has come from Tasmania’s share of GST revenue collected by the to 2021-22 (Chart 6.9), which is in turn helping to finance will remain below the average for all states and territories Federal Government (Chart 6.10): this in turn reflects both strong growth in total GST higher levels of infrastructure investment. (Note the ‘net through 2021-22 (Chart 6.7). collections and some increase in Tasmania’s share of the GST pool. Revenue from operating balance’ as published in the State Budget Papers The other improvement in the financial position of Tasmania’s Commonwealth grants has also grownincludes rapidly.

Tasmania’s improved about $177mn pa of Commonwealth Government general government sector reflects greater control over economic performance has also been reflected in stronger growth in state taxation grants for capital purposes which accounting conventions government spending since 2010-11, and stronger growth in revenue, particularly from stamp duty. treat as ‘operating revenues’; excluding these the ‘underlying’ that of any other state or territory except New South Wales

(Chart 6.6), and on the most recent state budget projections

revenues since 2013-14.

operating balance will record small deficits over the forward

However the most recent State Budget forecasts revenue to grow much more slowly estimates period). over the next four years, largely reflecting slower growth in GST revenue (as a result of a decline in Tasmania’s share) and virtually no growth in other Commonwealth grants. State taxation revenue is also projected to grow at a slower rate over the next four years than over the past four: this may prove to be an under-estimate, T Cthan C I TA SM A N I A pa REPORT 2018 however, if Tasmania’s economy grows at a faster rate the 2-2¼% envisaged by State Treasury.

73

5

FINANCIAL POSITION AND PERFORMANCE OF TASMANIA’S PUBLIC SECTOR (CONTINUED)

Chart 6.10: Growth in major categories of ‘operating revenues’

Chart 6.11: Growth in major categories of ‘operating expenses’

12

12

% pa

10

(+47%)

10

8 6

8

4 2

6

0

4

-2 -4

2

-6 -8

% pa

State taxation

GBE revenue

2001-02 to 2009-10 2014-15 to 2016-17

GST revenue

Other grants etc

2010-11 to 2013-14 2017-18 to 2020-21

0

Education

Health

2001-02 to 2009-10 2014-15 to 2016-17

Public safety

All other

2010-11 to 2013-14 2017-18 to 2020-21

Sources: Tasmanian Government, Budget Paper No. 1, 2018-19 and previous years; Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, 2017-18.

Spending on health, education and public order and safety have risen at faster Spending on health, education and public order and rates, of 6%, 4% and 4¼% pa respectively, over the past four years, than in other safety have risen at faster rates, of 6%, 4% and 4¼% pa operating revenues over the past four years has come areas, where growth has been held to past less four than 2½% onfunctional respectively, over the years, thanpa, in other fromfunctional Tasmania’s share of GST revenuespending collected by the average (Chart areas, where spending growth has been held to less than federal government (Chart 6.11).

6.10): this in turn reflects both More than half of the growth in the state government’s

strong growth in total GST collections and some increase

2½% pa, on average (Chart 6.11).

The forward estimates in the most recent State Budget imply a sharp slowing in The forward estimates the most recent State Budget spending on health, to less than 2% pa over the four years to in2021-22.

Given the Commonwealth grants has also grown rapidly. Tasmania’s imply a sharp system slowing inthis spending on health, to less to than 2% pressures being experienced in the Tasmanian health forecast is likely improved economic performance has also been reflected in pa over the four years to 2021-22. Given the pressures being be growth subject to some revision.from There may also be pressure for additional stronger in state taxationupward revenue, particularly in the Tasmanian health system this forecast is spending in some other areas of the budget,experienced including housing. stamp duty. in Tasmania’s share of the GST pool. Revenue from other

likely to be subject to some upward revision. There may also

be pressure for additional in some other areas of However most recent Statestronger Budget forecasts revenue position The the Government’s operating has allowed it tospending undertake higher budget, includingGeneral housing. to grow much slowly over the next four years,and largelysocial the levels ofmore investment in economic infrastructure.

government to 2021-22 is projected to exceed $2½bn, decline in Tasmania’s share) and virtually no growth in an increase of more than 70% by comparison with the four years ended 2017-18 other Commonwealth grants. State taxation revenue is also (Chart 6.12). Apart from the Royal Hobart Hospital redevelopment, which is projected to grow at a slower rate over the next four years expected to be completed during the 2019-20 financial year, the largest than over the past four: this may prove to be an undercomponent of this infrastructure spend is in roads, although the most recent State estimate, however, if Tasmania’s economy grows at a faster Budget also includes new investments in housing, schools and the justice system. reflecting slower growthspending in GST revenue (as a result of ayears infrastructure over the four

rate than the 2-2¼% pa envisaged by State Treasury.

74

Infrastructure investment by GBEs is also expected to approach $2.8bn over the four years to 2021-22, almost $1bn more than over the past four years. This includes the funding for the expected replacement of TT Line’s Spirit of Tasmania vessels in the beginning in 2021. However it does not include potential investments by Hydro Tasmania and TasNetworks in mooted pumped hydro developments or additional electricity TCC I TA S M Ainterconnection N I A R E P O R T 2with 0 1 8the mainland.

Including some large private sector projects, the Government now envisages a

6

FINANCIAL POSITION AND PERFORMANCE OF TASMANIA’S PUBLIC SECTOR (CONTINUED)

Thousands

Chart 6.12: Tasmanian state public sector infrastructure investment 1.6 1.4 1.2

$bn GBEs

Forward estimates

General government

6.0

% of GSP

Forward estimates

5.0 4.0

1.0

Tasmania

3.0

0.8 0.6

2.0

0.4

All states & territories

1.0

0.2 0.0

Chart 6.13: State non-financial public sector infrastructure investment as pc of GSP

0.0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Financial years ended 30 June

07080910111213141516171819202122 Financial years ended 30 June

Note: ‘infrastructure investment’ in the above charts is measured by ‘purchases of non-financial assets’ as shown in Budget Papers. Sources: Tasmanian Government, Budget Paper No. 1, 2018-19 and previous years; Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report, 2017-18; other state and territory Budget Papers.

State public sector infrastructure investment will represent a larger share of Including some large private sector projects, the Government Tasmania’s economy over the next four years than in other states and territories, on now envisages a ‘pipeline’ of $13.9bn of infrastructure it to undertake higher levels of investment in economic and average (Chart 6.12). This partly reflects the relatively larger role which governmentspending in Tasmania over the next decade. social infrastructure. General government infrastructure owned businesses in isTasmania’s electricity industry compared with most other spending over the four years toplay 2021-22 projected State public sector infrastructure investment will represent states or territories.

Tasmanian general government infrastructure investment. to exceed $2½bn, an increase of more than 70% by The Government’s stronger operating position has allowed

comparison with the four years ended 2017-18 (Chart 6.12).

a larger share of Tasmania’s economy over the next four

Tasmania’s unfunded public sector6.13). superannuation liability This partly reflects the relatively larger role which

Apart from the Royal Hobart Hospital redevelopment, which

years than in other states and territories, on average (Chart

is expected to be completed during the 2019-20 financial

government-owned businesses play in Tasmania’s electricity otherwise strong public sector financial industry compared with most other states or territories. scorecard is its large unfunded superannuation liability. roads, although the most recent State Budget also includes

one component significant blemish on Tasmania’s year,The the largest of this infrastructure spend is in new investments in housing, schools and the justice system.

Tasmanian general government infrastructure investment.

The present value of the Tasmanian Government’s liability to pay pensions and lump (including judges and MPs) who are or were approach $2.8bn over the four years to 2021-22, almost $1bn members of (now closed) defined benefit superannuation schemes was estimated more the past as fourat years. includes the funding tothan beover $10.2bn theThis end of the 2017-18 financial year. Partly offsetting this, the for the expected replacement of TT Line’s Spirit of Tasmania value of ‘plan assets’ (that is, the contributions made by members of these schemes vessels in the beginning in 2021. However it does not include and the accumulated investment income earned on them) was estimated to be potential investments by Hydro Tasmania and TasNetworks nearly $2.0bn – leaving an ‘unfunded liability’ of $8.3bn.

Infrastructure GBEs is also expected to sums toinvestment current by and former employees

in mooted pumped hydro developments or additional

in respect of GBE employees, the total unfunded superannuation liability was estimated to have been $9.0bn as at the end of the 2016-17 financial year2.

electricity interconnection with the mainland.

Adding in the unfunded liability

2 These estimates are highly sensitive to the discount rate used to calculate the present value of liabilities expected to fall due over the next 55 or so years. A 1 percentage change T C C I TApoint SMA N I A RinEthe PORT 2018 discount rate increases or decreases the State’s gross liability by an average of $1.4bn. The 2017-18 Budget forecast that the total unfunded superannuation liability will decline by $1.6bn, to $7.4bn by 30

75

TASMANIA’S UNFUNDED PUBLIC SECTOR SUPERANNUATION LIABILITY The one significant blemish on Tasmania’s otherwise strong public sector financial scorecard is its large unfunded superannuation liability.

The present value of the Tasmanian Government’s liability to pay pensions and lump sums to current and former employees (including judges and MPs) who are or were members of (now closed) defined benefit superannuation schemes was estimated to be $10.2bn as at the end of the 2017-18 financial year. Partly offsetting this, the value of ‘plan assets’ (that is, the contributions made by members of these schemes and the accumulated investment income earned on them) was estimated to be nearly $2.0bn – leaving an ‘unfunded liability’ of $8.3bn.

Adding in the unfunded liability in respect of GBE employees, the total unfunded superannuation liability was estimated to have been $9.0bn as at the end of the 2016-17 financial year.

This represents 29% of Tasmania’s 2017-18 gross product, a larger proportion than for any other state or territory, and more than three times the average for all states and territories (Chart 6.14).

The cash cost of meeting the ‘general government’ component of this liability is forecast to rise from about $280mn (equivalent to 4.4% of operating cash receipts) in 2018-19 to a peak of $438mn (5% of operating cash receipts) in 2027-28.

On present indications, the unfunded superannuation liability will not be extinguished until 2080; servicing it will still be absorbing 3½% of operating cash flows in 20 years’ time.

The unfunded superannuation liability differs from conventional debt in that none of it needs to be re-financed at periodic intervals – that is, it doesn’t carry any ‘refinancing risk’. However, it does represent a constraint on Tasmania’s capacity to take on conventional debt (for example, in order to finance higher levels of infrastructure investment) in two important ways.

76

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

7

Chart 6.14: Non-financial public sector unfunded superannuation liabilities, June 2018 35 % of GSP 30 June 2018 30 25

The cas ‘genera this liab about $ operati a peak cash re

20 15 10

Average of all states & territories

5 0

NSW Vic Qld

This rep 2017-18 proport territory the ave territorie

SA

WA

Tas

NT

ACT

Sources: State and Territory Treasuries, Annual Financial Reports (or equivalents), 2017-18, except for Queensland and South Australia, 2018-19 Budget Papers; ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

On pre superan extingu still be a cash flo

The unfunded superannuation liability differs from conv intervals – that is strong position with regard to net debt, its net financial ‘refinancing risk’. However, it does represent a constra liabilities (which includes superannuation) represent a take on conventional debt (for example, in order to fin higher proportion of its revenues (a key ratio used by credit infrastructure investment) in two important ways.

First, it means very it needs tothat, benowithstanding re-financedTasmania’s at periodic

rating agencies) than that of any other state except South

Australia.

This is onethat, of thenowithstanding main reasons why Tasmania First, it means Tasmania’s

very stro superan – which in turn results in the Tasmanian Government paying proportion of its revenues (a key ratio used by credit ra slightly higher interest rates on its borrowings than most any other state except South Australia. This is one of th other states. doesn’t have a AAA rating, as might otherwise be exp Second, the relatively Government large annual cash cost of meeting the higher inter the Tasmanian paying slightly Government’s obligations to retired public sector employees than most other states. doesn’t a AAA rating, as might otherwise be expected debt, have its net financial liabilities (which includes

means that it has less scope than other states or territories

Second, the relatively cash cost to pay interest on debt without large pushing annual the ‘net operating

of meeti public sector employees means t other ABS, states or territories to pay interest on debt withou Source: Schools (4221,0), 2017, balance’ into deficit. obligations to retired balance’ into deficit.

As explained in last year’s Tasmania Report, there are to the Government for reducing this liability over a sho years envisaged in the most recent State Budget. The f (that is, spend less on both recurrent expenses and infr state taxes, federal government grants and other reve aside in a fund dedicated to offsetting the liability. The invest the proceeds in a similar way. In either case, the

TASMANIA’S UNFUNDED PUBLIC SECTOR SUPERANNUATION LIABILITY (CONTINUED) As explained in last year’s Tasmania Report, there are only

However, that also implies that, for several decades, the

two broad options open to the Government for reducing

unfunded superannuation liability will continue to represent

this liability over a shorter time-frame than the 62 years

a constraint on Tasmanian governments’ budget flexibility,

envisaged in the most recent State Budget. The first is to

and a source of risk to future budgets. In particular, it means

run cash surpluses (that is, spend less on both recurrent

that the present and future Tasmanian governments

expenses and infrastructure than received from state taxes,

have less scope than the governments of other states

federal government grants and other revenue sources), and

and territories for borrowing, even at present relatively low

set them aside in a fund dedicated to offsetting the liability.

interest rates, in order to fund worthwhile infrastructure

The second is to sell assets and invest the proceeds in a

investments.

similar way. In either case, the returns on the investments, and the capital itself, can be drawn down in the future in order to reduce the requirement to divert revenues to meeting superannuation payments.

Previous Tasmanian governments pursued the first of these options in the late 1990s and early 2000s, but the accumulated balances were drawn down in order to finance budget deficits incurred in the early years of this decade. And other state governments, and at the federal level the Howard Government in the early 2000s, have pursued the second.

It is not at all obvious that, in current circumstances, it would be economically sensible to preference accumulating cash balances over undertaking infrastructure investment. And it is clear that there is no appetite anywhere across the political spectrum in Tasmania for major asset sales.

Hence, unlike its predecessors, this Report is no longer advocating that the Government contemplate the sale or lease of any major business assets.

A bank that benefits all of us,

NOT JUST SOME OF US.

How unexpected.

At Bank of us we reinvest our profits to benefit our customers and the local community.

As the only Tasmanian customer owned bank, we’re committed to supporting the future of Tasmania and we are proud to partner with the TCCI and economist Saul Eslake, for the release of the 2018 Tasmania Report.

It might not be what you’re expecting from a bank but then we’re not like any other bank.

bankofus.com.au | 1300 306 716 Bank of us is a trading name of B&E Ltd ABN 32 087 652 088 AFSL & Australian Credit Licence 236870.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

77

present and future Tasmanian governments have less scope than the governments of other states and territories for borrowing, even at present relatively low interest rates, in order to fund worthwhile infrastructure investments.

Budget risks and pressures Last year’s Tasmania Report devoted considerable attention to the risks posed to Tasmania’s budget by the review of GST revenue-sharing arrangements then being undertaken by the Productivity Commission. Tasmania has long been a major beneficiary of the principles of ‘horizontal fiscal equalization’ under which general purpose payments from the Commonwealth to the states and territories (or, since 2000-01, revenue from the GST) have been distributed (see Charts 6.15 and 6.16).

BUDGET RISKS AND PRESSURES Chart 6.15: GST revenue shares per head of population, 2018-19

Chart 6.16: GST revenue shares as a proportion of total ‘operating revenue’, 2018-19

8

60

7

$'000 per head, 2018-19

$11,405

50

6 5 4

% of total operating revenue, 2018-19

40

Notional equal per capita distribution

Average of all states & territories

30

3

20

2 10

1 0

NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA

Tas

NT

ACT

0

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

Sources: Australian Government, Budget Paper No. 3, 2018-19; State and Territory Government 2018-19 Budget Papers.

Last year’s Tasmania Report devoted considerable attention

The Federal Government rejected this recommendation in

to the risks posed to Tasmania’s budget by the review of

favour of equalizing to the fiscally stronger of New South

GST revenue-sharing arrangements then being undertaken

Wales and Victoria, together with the introduction of a ‘floor’

by the Productivity Commission. Tasmania has long been

below which any state or territory’s share of GST revenues,

a major beneficiary of the principles of ‘horizontal fiscal

relative to its share of Australia’s population, would not be

equalization’ under which general purpose payments from

allowed to fall.

the Commonwealth to the states and territories (or, since 2000-01, revenue from the GST) have been distributed (see Charts 6.15 and 6.16).

This new equalization benchmark would also have disadvantaged the smaller states (including Tasmania) and territories: but the federal government proposed to offset

The Productivity Commission’s Final Report recommended

that by ‘topping up’ the GST revenue pool by more than

that the objective of horizontal fiscal equalization be

$9bn over the next decade, such that ‘no state or territory

narrowed from (in effect) lifting the ‘fiscal capacity’ of

would be worse off’ as a result. However there was initially

all states and territories to that of the fiscally strongest

no similar guarantee that the proposed ‘relativity floor’ –

state (which in recent years has been Western Australia)

which was primarily intended to protect Western Australia’s

to ‘equalizing to the average’, by which it meant lifting the

share of GST revenue from falling below 75% of its share

‘fiscal capacity’ of the weaker states and territories to that

of the population – would not make other states and

of the average of all states and territories rather than to

territories worse off if, for example, there were to be

the strongest. That would have resulted in a significant

another ‘mining boom’.

142

redistribution of GST revenues from Tasmania, South Australia and the two territories to Western Australia, New South Wales and Victoria.

Productivity Commission, Horizontal Fiscal Equalization - Inquiry Report, Canberra, May 2018.

14

78

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

BUDGET RISKS AND PRESSURES (CONTINUED)

In the end, the federal government agreed to legislate an

The first of these is that it may become increasingly

additional safeguard for the smaller states and territories

difficult to maintain the degree of spending restraint

which in effect guarantees that, at least until 2028-29,

which the Government has exercised since first coming

they will receive the greater of their entitlement under

to office in 2014.

the new arrangements, or what they would have received under the system applying up until 2018-19. Although this introduces an additional element of complexity into the GST revenue-sharing arrangements, it would seem that the risks to Tasmania’s share of GST revenue have now been significantly reduced.

Of course, to the extent that Tasmania’s improved economic performance results in an improvement in Tasmania’s ‘fiscal capacity’, as assessed each year by the Grants Commission, then Tasmania’s share of the GST revenue will decline – but that would be something to be welcomed, rather than feared.

In health in particular, notwithstanding its election commitments (on which the most recent Budget delivers), the Government may well find that it cannot meet community expectations without increasing spending more rapidly than provided for in the most recent Budget.

The Grants Commission’s most recent assessment of Tasmania’s budget (which it undertakes as part of its determination of each state and territory’s ‘fiscal capacity’ in order to arrive at its recommendations as to how revenue from the GST should be distributed among the states and territories) suggests that, in 2017-18, Tasmania spent $160mn, or 10%, less than it would have ‘needed to’ in

However, while that source of risk to Tasmania’s public

order to provide a similar standard of health services to that

sector finances appears to have lessened considerably,

provided by all states and territories, on average, after taking

there are other areas of potential pressure or risk which

account of differences in the ‘need’ for, and cost of providing, 10 these services (Chart 6.17).

merit attention.

Chart 6.17: Difference between Tasmanian Government actual spending, and Grants Commission’s assessment of spending required to provide ‘national average’ level of services, 2017-18 100

$mn

50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200

School Other Health Housedu- eduing cation cation

Wel- Com- Jusfare munity tice services

Roads Trans- Ser- Other Investport vices exp- ment to in- enses dustry

Source: Commonwealth Grants Commission, 2018 Update Report, Tables S7-1to S7-6.

The Grants Commission’s most recent assessment of Tasmania’s budget (which it undertakes as part of its determination of each state and territory’s ‘fiscal capacity’ in order to arrive at its recommendations as to how revenue from the GST should be C C I in TA S M A N ITasmania A REPORT 2018 distributed among the states and territories) suggests Tthat, 2017-18, spent $160mn, or 10%, less than it would have ‘needed to’ in order to provide a

79

BUDGET RISKS AND PRESSURES (CONTINUED) In considering this assessment, it’s important to note that

The same Grants Commission assessment as referred to

the suggestion that Tasmania may be spending less than

earlier estimates that, in 2017-18, Tasmania collected about

it ‘needs to’ on health is not a recent development: this has

12% (or $250mn) less revenue than it would have done

been a consistent finding in the Grants Commission’s reports

had its regime of state taxes and charges been equivalent

for at least six years. And the precise figure should not be

to the average of all states and territories (Chart 6.18). This

taken too literally: in this area (and in some others, notably

difference results largely from less ‘severe’ stamp duties,

community services, there may be structural differences

motor taxes and mining revenues, rather than from payroll

among the states and territories in the way in which services

tax or land tax (Chart 6.19).

are delivered which the Grants Commission’s methods do not fully take into account).

Nonetheless, the Grants Commission’s broad assessment does appear consistent with ongoing evidence of pressures and short-comings in Tasmania’s health system.

More broadly, the Government may also encounter pressure on the spending side of its budget in order to ensure that, as the Premier put it in his recent ‘State of the State’ address, “all Tasmanians are feeling the benefits of a strong economy, and that no-one is left behind”15.3Chapters 2 and 3 of this

This Report is not advocating that the Government abandon its fiscal strategy objective of maintaining a ‘competitive tax environment’.

To become a ‘high tax jurisdiction’ would almost inevitably have adverse consequences for Tasmania’s ability to attract investment and create employment.

However, there may be some scope to consider ways of raising additional revenue which do not detract from Tasmania’s overall competitiveness.

Report have noted that among those at risk of being ‘left

As noted in last year’s Tasmania Report, Tasmania has a

behind’ are those who have been unemployed for

narrow payroll tax base. Tasmania’s ‘headline’ payroll tax

prolonged periods; and low-income households requiring

rate of 6.1% is the highest of any state or territory with the

rental accommodation.

exception of the ACT; and the threshold at which it becomes

In addition, and notwithstanding the significant increase in infrastructure spending provided for in the past two state budgets, the Government is also likely to face pressure for additional investment, particularly in transport and housingrelated infrastructure, in order to respond to some of the

payable – now $2mn following the introduction of a lower rate of 4% for employers with payrolls of $1¼-2mn in the 2018-19 Budget – is, along with the ACT, also the highest in Australia. Treasury figures suggest that only 7½% of Tasmanian employers pay payroll tax.

emerging stresses and strains associated with more rapid

Yet it is far from clear that Tasmania’s very generous payroll

population growth – and growth in the number of visitors

tax exemptions for small businesses have had any positive

to Tasmania.

impact on employment creation in Tasmania. Last year’s

Failure to respond adequately to these stresses and strains could result in more widespread questioning of the desirability of more rapid population and economic growth, or of more rapid growth in areas such as tourism – of which there have been some indications already over the past year.

Of course, any additional expenditures have to be paid for,

Tasmania Report urged consideration of extending payroll tax to all employers, irrespective of size, allowing the rate to be less than 4%, noting that if the tax were administered by the Australian Taxation Office it could be collected in the same way as PAYG income tax collections (from all employers, irrespective of their size) without any additional administrative burden on small employers.

by some combination of higher revenues, reductions in other areas of spending, or increased borrowing (and the third of these ultimately has to be serviced by some combination of the first two).

Hon. Will Hodgman MP, CEDA State of the State speech, 23rd November 2018.

15

80

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

higher revenues, reductions in other areas of spending, or increased borrowing (and the third of these ultimately has to be serviced by some combination of the first two).

The same Grants Commission assessment as referred to earlier estimates that, in 2017-18, Tasmania collected about 12% (or $250mn) less revenue than it would have done had its regime of state taxes and charges been equivalent to the average of all states and territories (Chart 6.18). This difference results largely from less ‘severe’ stamp duties, motor taxes and mining revenues, rather than from payroll tax or land tax (Chart 6.19).

This Report not advocating that the Government abandon its fiscal strategy BUDGET RISKSisAND PRESSURES (CONTINUED) objective of maintaining a ‘competitive tax environment’.

Chart 6.18: ‘Tax severity ratios’, states and territories, 2017-18 110

Chart 6.19: ‘Tax severity ratios’ for specific revenue sources, Tasmania, 2017-18 120

%

%

110

105

100 100

90 80

95

70

90

60 85 80

50

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT

Payroll Land Stamp Insur- Motor Mining Other tax tax duty ance taxes rev- revtax enue enue

Note: The ‘tax severity ratio’ is the ratio of revenue actually raised by a state or territory to the revenue which the Grants Commission assesses it would raise if it levied a particular tax or charge, or total taxes and charges, at the same rate over the same base as the average of all states and territories, after taking into account differences between its capacity to raise revenue, and the average of all states and territories.

Source: Commonwealth Grants Commission, 2018 Update Report, Tables S7-1to S7-6. .

Small business would, understandably enough, vociferously

There may also be merit in giving further consideration to the

object to the idea that they should pay payroll tax. But there

suggestion of a levy on short-term tourist accommodation,

is no sound or valid economic reason why small business

as recently proposed by Airbnb and the Lord Mayor of

should receive preferential tax treatment .

Hobart17.5Although this proposal has been promptly

16 4

If there is to be any kind of preferential tax treatment given to particular types of businesses, a far more sensible basis for doing so than the size of the business concerned is to give preferential treatment to new businesses – whether they are new Tasmanian businesses, or established businesses setting up in Tasmania for the first time. New businesses are much more likely than small ones to create

rejected by both Government and Opposition, as well as by representatives of the tourism industry, such levies are commonplace in overseas tourist destinations, and may provide a means not only of funding additional tourismrelated infrastructure investment, but also of demonstrating to the broader Tasmanian community that the benefits of rapid growth in tourism are being widely shared.

new jobs; and they are more likely to engage in innovation than small businesses. Preferentially taxing new businesses also avoids the perverse incentives inherent in any system of preferential treatment for small businesses, prompting them to refrain from hiring the marginal employee who will push them above the tax-free threshold.

See, for example, Richard Holden, ‘Is small business really the engine room of the economy?’, The Conversation, 10 June 2016; or Dora Benedek et al, The Right Kind of Help? Tax Incentives for Staying Small, IMF Working Paper No. 17/139, Washington DC, June 2017.

16

‘Tasmanian tourist hotspots could see millions in revenue from short stay user tax’, The Examiner, 27th September 2018; ‘Visitor levy could fund tourism infrastructure, says Lord Mayor’, The Mercury, 11th November 2018.

17

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

81

82

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

Chapter 7 TASMANIA’S LONG-TERM ECONOMIC CHALLENGE The first three Chapters of this Report set out and analysed the significant improvement in Tasmania’s economic performance over the past few years, while Chapter 4 showed that this has in turn an acceleration in the growth rate of Tasmania’s population. Despite these welcome and encouraging developments, however, this Report has also indicated that Tasmania continues to lag behind the rest of Australia on a wide range of measures of economic and social well-being.

This Chapter updates the analytical framework as in the three previous Tasmania Reports to highlight the key reasons for the differences in Tasmania’s long-term economic performance and that of other states and territories, to show the extent to which progress is being made in narrowing those differences, and to provide some indication of the potential for further improvements in Tasmanian living standards relative to those of the rest of Australia.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

83

TASMANIA’S ECONOMY COMPARED WITH THAT OF MAINLAND AUSTRALIA The annual ABS estimates of gross state product

Nonetheless, these estimates, and others based on

provide the broadest, and most timely, basis for

them, are widely used by governments, analysts and

comparison of the economic performance of each of

commentators. They provide the only available basis for

Australia’s states and territories, and of the material

making broad comparisons of the sort which this section

well-being of their populations.

seeks to make. This section therefore makes extensive use of the published estimates of gross state product, whilst

Like its national counterpart, gross domestic product (GDP),

being aware of their limitations, and being conscious of

gross state product is an incomplete measure of both

those limitations in the conclusions which it draws.

economic performance and well-being. There are many things which it doesn’t include, such as the value of unpaid

Tasmania’s per capita gross state product, according

work done in homes and in the broader community, or the

to the most recent ABS State Accounts, was $58,759 in

depletion of finite natural resources . Nor does it make any

2017-18 – the lowest of any state or territory. It was also

allowance for the effects of traffic congestion, pollution,

$15,846, or 21.2%, below the national average of $74,605

deteriorating housing affordability, increasing inequality, or

per person (Chart 7.1).

18

crime – the lower incidence of all of which in Tasmania, compared with other parts of Australia, is cherished by most Tasmanians. As acknowledged in Chapter 1, there are also some specific on-going concerns about the reliability and volatility of the ABS estimates of gross

Thousands

state product for Tasmania.

Chart 7.1: Gross state product per head of population, states and territories, 2017-18 120 $000 per head, 2017-18

2

Chart 7.2: Tasmania’s gross state product as a pc of national average, 2001-02 to 2021-22 81

% of national average

100 80 60

80

National average $15.8K

79

40

2018-19 Budget forecasts

78

20 77 0

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Financial years ended 30 June

Source: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; Tasmanian and Australian Government 2018-19 Budget Papers.

The good news is that since 2013-14 the gap between Tasmania’s per capita gross product and that of Australia as a whole has however narrowed by 1.6 percentage For points. a broader discussion of these issues eg, Joseph Stiglitz, Armatya Sen Jean-Paul Report by the Commission on the MeasureCombining the see, forecasts contained inand the mostFitoussi, recent Tasmanian and ment of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris, September 2009; or Diane Coyle, ‘Rethinking GDP’, Finance and Development, Vol. 54, No.Federal 1, International Monetary Fund, Washington March 2017. to narrow by a further percentage point in the Budgets, the gap isDC, expected current financial year, and then level out at 20% below the national average over the years 2019-20 through 2021-22 (Chart 7.2) – returning Tasmania’s position relative toI the where it was immediately before the onset of the TCC TA Snational M A N I A average R E P O R Tto2roughly 018 financial crisis a decade ago.

18

84

TASMANIA’S ECONOMY COMPARED WITH THAT OF MAINLAND AUSTRALIA (CONTINUED) The good news is that since 2013-14 the gap between

A useful framework for understanding why Tasmania’s per

Tasmania’s per capita gross product and that of Australia

capita gross product is so much lower than that of the rest

as a whole has however narrowed by 1.6 percentage points.

of Australia – and how it may be possible to make further

Combining the forecasts contained in the most recent

progress in reducing it – is the one which has been widely

Tasmanian and Federal Budgets, the gap is expected to

used by economists to make long-run economic growth

narrow by a further percentage point in the current financial

projections, for example in the Intergenerational Reports

year, and then level out at 20% below the national average

produced by the Commonwealth Treasury over the past

over the years 2019-20 through 2021-22 (Chart 7.2) –

fifteen years, and which has been used in the past three

returning Tasmania’s position relative to the national average

Tasmania Reports.

to roughly where it was immediately before the onset of the financial crisis a decade ago.

A critical question for Tasmania’s long-term future is whether we can do any better than this – and if so, how might we go about it?

This framework can be adapted to show that gross state product per person can be disaggregated into three separate components as follows: GROSS STATE PRODUCT POPULATION

=

EMPLOYMENT POPULATION

HOURS WORKED

x

EMPLOYMENT

x

GROSS STATE PRODUCT HOURS WORKED

or, alternatively: GSP PER CAPITA

=

EMPLOYMENT RATE

x

AVERAGE HOURS WORKED

x

PRODUCTIVITY

Note that there is no economic theory, and that there are no assumptions, underlying this expression: it is simply an algebraic expression.

And it holds true by definition, as can be seen by ‘cancelling out’ the employment and hours worked terms on the right hand side of the equals sign, leaving the statement that gross state product divided by population equals gross state product divided by population. Inserting the employment and hours worked terms serves simply to assist in understanding where differences in, or growth in, gross state product per capita come from.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

85

PARTICIPATION IN EMPLOYMENT However, as noted in Chapter 2, the remaining one-third

47.3%, on average, of Tasmania’s total population were employed during the 2017-18 financial year – a smaller proportion than in any other state or territory, and 3 percentage points below the national average (Chart 7.3).

3

of the difference between Tasmania’s employment-topopulation ratio and the national average is the result of lower age-specific workforce participation rates.

Nonetheless, the 2017-18 figure is the highest since 2008-

Theby proportion of 15-64out’ year old Tasmanians who were And it holds true by definition, as can be seen ‘cancelling the employment in employment was 1.9 sign, percentage pointsthe below the and hours worked terms on the right hand side of the equals leaving population ratio and the national average has declined by 1.2 national average in equals 2017-18. This difference narrowed statement that gross state product divided by population gross statehas product percentage points over the past five years (Chart 7.4). substantially 4.2 percentage points inserves 2011-12, helping divided by population. Inserting the employment and from hours worked terms to offset the effects of the ageing of Tasmania’s population.

As discussed in Chapters 2 and 4, about two-thirds of the simply to assist in understanding where differences in, or growth in, gross state difference between Tasmania’s employment-to-population It should be possible to reduce this gap further over time. product per capita come from.

09; and the gap between Tasmania’s employment-to-

ratio and the national average is the result of Tasmania’s

demographic profile. 19.7% of Tasmanians are aged 65 or

Participation in employment

over, 4.1 percentage points more than the corresponding figure for Australia as a whole: and the most recent ABS

As discussed in Chapter 5, the best way of achieving that goal is through higher rates of educational participation and attainment.

47.3%, on average, of Tasmania’s totalby population population projections suggest that this margin will widen

were employed during the 201718 financial year – a smaller proportion than in any other state or territory, and 3 a further percentage point between now and 2023-24, and percentage points the national by yet another percentage pointbelow (to 6.2 percentage points)average (Chart 7.3). Nonetheless, the 2017-18 by 2031-32.

All else being equal this implies that Tasmania’s figure is the highest since 2008-09; and the gap between Tasmania’s employmentemployment-to-population ratio will trend over time. to-population ratio and the down national average has declined by 1.2 percentage points over the past five years (Chart 7.4).

Chart 7.3: Employment as a pc of total population, states and territories, 2017-18 56 % of population,

Chart 7.4: Employment as a pc of population, Tasmania and Australia, 2001-02 to 2017-18

54

50

52

Tasmania

44 42

46 44

Australia

46

3.0 pc pts

48

% of population

48

National average

50

52

40 NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

Financial years ended 30 June

16

18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018; State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18.

86

As discussed in Chapters 2 and 4, about two-thirds of the difference between Tasmania’s employment-to-population ratio and the national average is the result of Tasmania’s demographic profile. 19.7% of Tasmanians are aged 65 or over, 4.1 percentage points more than the corresponding figure for Australia as a whole: and the most recent ABS population projections suggest that this margin will widen by a further percentage point between now and 2023-24, and by yet another TCC I TA S M A N point I A R E(to P O6.2 R Tpercentage 2018 percentage points) by 2031-32. All else being equal this implies that Tasmania’s employment-to-population ratio will trend down over time.

HOURS OF WORK

4

Those Tasmanians who did have jobs during 2017-18

While part-time employment is often a matter of choice:

given that Tasmanian workers are, on average, older The proportion of 15-64 year old Tasmanians and who were in employment was 1.9 than their mainland counterparts, many of them are likely percentage points below the national average in 2017-18. This difference has to be content with working part-time. However, a higher the national average (Chart 7.5). Over the course of an narrowed substantially from 4.2 percentage points in 2011-12, helping to offset the proportion of part-time workers in Tasmania than in the rest entire year this difference adds up to almost 72 hours: the effects of the ageing of Tasmania’s population. worked an average of 30.7 hours per week, fewer than in

any other state or territory, and 1.4 hours per week less than

equivalent of Tasmania having 10 more public holidays each

of Australia indicate that they would like to work more hours

yearIt than the restbe of Australia.

should possible

than they currently do.discussed in Chapter 5, to reduce this gap further over time. As bestinway ofhours achieving that goal is through higher rates of educational As discussed in Chapter 5, the probability of being employed The the difference average worked between Tasmania and attainment. full-time rises with levels of educational attainment, so the and participation Australia as a whole largely reflects the fact that 37.3% of employed Tasmanians work part-time, a higher

pursuit of higher levels of educational participation and

proportion than in any other state or territory and well

attainment is likely to contribute to narrowing the ‘hours

above the national average of 31.7%. This margin has

worked’ gap, as well as the ‘participation’ gap.

Hours of work

Those who have jobs continued to Tasmanians widen over the past fewdid years, although it during 2017-18 worked an average of 30.7 hours perbeen week, than in any other state or territory, and 1.4 hours per week less appears to have partlyfewer offset by an increase in the average number of hours worked by both fulland than the national average (Chart 7.5). Over the course of an entire year this part-time workers inadds Tasmania. difference up to almost 72 hours: the equivalent of Tasmania having 10 more public holidays each year than the rest of Australia.

Chart 7.5: Average hours worked, states and territories, 2017-18 35 Hours per week, 34 33

Chart 7.6: Average hours worked, Tasmania and Australia, 2001-02 to 2017-18 34 Hours per week

2017-18

National average

33

32

32

1.4 hours

31

Australia

Tasmania

31

30 29 28

30 NSW Vic Qld

SA

WA Tas

NT ACT

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

16

18

Financial years ended 30 June

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018.

The difference in average hours worked between Tasmania and Australia as a whole largely reflects the fact that 37.3% of employed Tasmanians work part-time, a higher proportion than in any other state or territory and well above the national average of 31.7%. This margin has continued to widen over the past few years, although it appears to have been partly offset by an increase in the average number of hours worked by both full- and part-time workers in Tasmania.

While part-time employment is often a matter of choice: and given that Tasmanian workers are, on average, older than their mainland counterparts, many of them are likely to be content with working part-time. However, a higher proportion of partT C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 time workers in Tasmania than in the rest of Australia indicate that they would like to work more hours than they currently do.

87

5

LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY

As discussed in Chapter 5, the probability of being employed full-time rises with levels of educational attainment, so the pursuit of higher levels of educational There are two broad reasons why Tasmanian labour For each hour that they worked in 2017-18, employed participation and attainment is likely to contribute to narrowing the ‘hours worked’ productivity, as measured in the ABS State Accounts, Tasmanians produced $77.78 worth of goods and services – as the ‘participation’ is so much lower than in the rest of Australia. less gap, than in as any well other state or territory, and $11.20 or gap.

12.6% below the national average (Chart 7.7).

Labour productivity Tasmania’s gross product per hour worked (labour

The first of these is that intrinsically high (labour) productivity industries – industries which are highly capital-

productivity) increased 0.7%they in 2017-18, a fasterinpace For each hourbythat worked 2017-18,

intensive (such as mining, or IT produced and telecommunications), employed Tasmanians $77.78 or which are intensive in their use of highly skilled (or highly worth of goods and services – less than in any other state or territory, and $11.20 or paid) labour (such as financial services) – tend to be ‘underafter four years over which Tasmania’s labour productivity 12.6% below the national average (Chart 7.7). than the national average of 0.2%. However this comes

grew at less than half the national average rate, so that the

represented’ in Tasmania.

‘productivity gap’ between andper Australia a Tasmania’s grossTasmania product hourasworked

(labour productivity) increased by 0.7% in Chart 7.9 shows estimates of the national average level of average of 0.2%. inHowever this comes after labour productivity 2017-18 for each of the 19 different decade (Chart 7.8). four years over which Tasmania’s labour productivity grew less halfBureau the of industry sectors into at which thethan Australian national average rate, so that the ‘productivity gap’ between Tasmania and Statistics divides the Australian economy, ranked from highest to lowest.

Australia as a whole remains wider than in the early years of the current decade (Chart 7.8). whole remains wider than inpace the early years the of thenational current 2017-18, a faster than

Chart 7.7: Gross product per hour worked, states and territories, 2017-18 120

Chart 7.8: Gross product per hour worked, Tasmania and Australia, 2001-02 to 2017-18

110

85

$ per hour worked 2017-18 (current prices)

80

National average

Australia

Tasmania

75 $11.20 / hour

70 65

70

60 60

$ per hour (2016-17 prices)

80

100 90

90

NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas

NT ACT

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

Financial years ended 30 June

16

18

Source: ABS, Labour Force (6202.0), October 2018; State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18. Data in Chart 7.8 shown in 2016-17 prices in order to eliminate the effect of price changes on measures of labour productivity.

There are two broad reasons why Tasmanian labour productivity, as measured in the ABS State Accounts, is so much lower than in the rest of Australia.

The first of these is that intrinsically high (labour) productivity industries – industries which are highly capital-intensive (such as mining, or IT and telecommunications), or which are intensive in their use of highly skilled (or highly paid) labour (such as financial services) – tend to be ‘under-represented’ in Tasmania.

88

Chart 7.9 shows estimates of the national average level of labour productivity in 2017-18 for each of the 19 different industry sectors into which the Australian Bureau of Statistics divides the Australian economy, ranked from highest to lowest.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

6

LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY (CONTINUED)

Chart 7.9: Labour productivity (gross value added per hour worked) by industry, Australia, 2017-18 Mining Financial & insurance services Electricity, gas & water Rental, hiring & real estate services Information, media & telcoms services Wholesale trade Administration & support services Public administration & safety Transport, postal & warehousing Agriculture, forestry & fishing Profn'l, scientific & technical services Construction Manufacturing Education & training Health care & social assistance Retail trade Art & recreation services Other services Accommodation & food services

All-industry average

$ per hour worked

0

50

100

150

200

250

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2016-17; and Labour Force, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018.

These estimates are, of necessity, approximations, and hence the discussion based The six industries whose labour productivity is between twoon these estimates should be regarded as suggestive, rather than conclusive2.

These estimates are, of necessity, approximations, and

hence the discussion based on these estimates should be

thirds and 100% of the all-industry average – represented

19 2 regarded as suggestive, rather thaninconclusive .

Tasmania’s problem, this context,

by the greenindustries bars in Chart which, 7.9 – account for about 40% is that the seven nationally, of employment in Tasmania, compared with 48% have problem, above-average ofseven labour productivity – the industries represented byof Tasmania’s in this context,levels is that the employment nationally. pink which, bars nationally, in Charthave 7.9above-average - account levels for less industries of than 11% of total employment in Tasmania, compared more than 16% by ofpink national employment (see Chart 7.10).

By contrast, the six industries where labour productivity labour productivity –with the industries represented bars in Chart 7.9 - account for less than 11% of total employment

nationally is less than two-thirds of the national all-

The six industries whose labour productivity is between two-thirds and 100% of the allindustry average – represented by the yellow bars in Chart industry average – represented by the green bars in Chart 7.9 – account for about 7.9 – account for over 49% of employment in Tasmania, employment (see Chart 7.10).

40% of employment in Tasmania, comparedcompared with 48% of employment nationally. with less than 35% of employment nationally. in Tasmania, compared with more than 16% of national

By contrast, the six industries where labour productivity nationally is less than twothirds of the national all-industry average – represented by the yellow bars in Chart 7.9 – account for over 49% of employment in Tasmania, compared with less than 35% of employment nationally.

They have been derived by dividing gross value added for each industry by an estimate of hours worked in each industry, which is in turn obtained by multiplying the average number of hours worked in the reference week for the middle month of each quarter during 2017-18 by 52, and then by the average number of people employed in the middle month of each quarter (that being the frequency with which these data are published).

2 They These estimates of hours by industry are, at best, approximations, and usually do notindustry sum to theby estimates of hours worked for Australia have beenworked derived by dividing gross value added for each an estimate of hours as a whole, or for each individual state or territory. The estimates of gross value added and hours worked are sourced from different surveys (of worked in each industry, which is in turn obtained by multiplying the average number of hours worked employers and households, respectively). Finally it should also be noted that estimates of gross value added for the public administration and in the reference weekand forhealth the middle of each quarter during 2017-18 by 52, andinput, thensoby the defence, education and training, care and month social assistance sectors are based largely on estimates of labour that the resulting estimates of labour productivity for theseemployed sectors are less thanmonth those forof sectors where the value of output is estimated more directly. average number of people inmeaningful the middle each quarter (that being the frequency

19

with which these data are published). These estimates of hours worked by industry are, at best, approximations, and usually do not sum to the estimates of hours worked for Australia as a whole, or for each individual state or territory. The estimates of gross value added and hours worked are sourced from different surveys (of employers and households, respectively).

Finally it should also noted TC C I TA SMAN I Abe RE P O Rthat T 2018 estimates of gross value added for the public administration and defence, education and training, and health care and social assistance sectors are based largely on estimates of labour input, so that the

89

7

Chart 7.10: Industry composition of employment according to labour productivity nationally as a proportion of average for all industries, Tasmania and Australia, 2017-18 70

% of total employment

LABOUR Tasmania(CONTINUED) Australia 60 PRODUCTIVITY

7

50 7.10: Industry composition of employment according to labour productivity nationally Chart as a proportion of average for all industries, Tasmania and Australia, 2017-18 40 70

% of total employment

30 60

Tasmania

Australia

20 50 10 40 0 30 20

Industries where labour productivity is >100% of all industries average

Industries where labour productivity is 50-100% of all industries average

Industries where labour productivity is <50% of all industries average

10

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; and Labour Force, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018.

The0second reason why labour productivity is so much lower than the rest of labour IndustriesTasmanians where labourwork in Industries where labourlabour AustraliaIndustries is that awhere majority of employed industries where productivity is >100% of all productivity is 50-100% of all productivity is <50% of all productivity is less than it is at the corresponding national industry level. industries average industries average industries average Chart 7.11 shows labour productivity in Tasmanian industries expressed as Sources: ABS, State (5220.0), 2017-18; industry and Labournational Force, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018. percentage ofAccounts the corresponding average.

The second reason why labour productivity is so much than the rest in ofTasmania Chart 7.11: Labour productivity (gross value added per hour lower worked) by industry Australia is that a majority of employed Tasmanians work in industries where labour as a percentage of national industry average, 2017-18 productivity is less than it is at the corresponding national industry level.

90

Information, media & telcoms services forestryproductivity & fishing Chart 7.11Agriculture, shows labour in Tasmanian industries expressed as Health of care & social assistance industry national average. percentage the corresponding Financial & insurance services Chart 7.11: LabourEducation productivity (gross value added per hour worked) by industry in Tasmania & training as a percentage of national industry Wholesale trade average, 2017-18 Manufacturing Information, media & telcoms Accommodation & food services Agriculture, & fishing Transport, postalforestry & warehousing Health care & socialRetail assistance trade Financial & insurance services Electricity, gas & water Education &&training Public administration safety Wholesale trade Art & recreation services Manufacturing Other services Accommodation & food services Prof'nal, scientific & technical Transport, postal & warehousing Administration & support services Retail trade Construction gas & water Rental, hiringElectricity, & real estate services % of national average productivity for each industry Public administration &Mining safety Art & recreation services 0 50 100 150 200 Other services Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; and Labour Force, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018.

Prof'nal, scientific & technical services Administration & support services Construction Rental, hiring & real estate services % of national average T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 productivity for each industry Mining

LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY (CONTINUED) The second reason why labour productivity is so much lower

population makes it an unlikely location for activities which

than the rest of Australia is that a majority of employed

are more typically found in large cities – such as financial

Tasmanians work in industries where labour productivity is

services (with the exception of tax havens) or a range of

less than it is at the corresponding national industry level.

specialist business services.

Chart 7.11 shows labour productivity in Tasmanian industries

However there may well be scope for expanding the size

expressed as percentage of the corresponding industry

of Tasmania’s electricity generation and distribution sector,

national average.

depending on the outcome of feasibility studies now under

Chart 7.11 shows that there are six Tasmanian industries (represented by the pink bars) in which labour productivity is higher than the national average for those industries.

However, as shown in Chart 7.12, only 34% of working Tasmanians are employed in those industries. Conversely, 76% of Tasmanian workers are employed in industries where labour productivity is less than the national averages for those industries – including 20% who work industries where

way, developments in energy policy at the national level and the availability of funding for additional interconnection across Bass Strait. There may also be potential for further growth in the Tasmanian information, media and telecommunications, and rental, hiring and real estate services sectors.

There should be more scope for improving the level of 8 labour productivity in those Tasmanian industries where it

labour productivity is more than 25% below the national

is currently below the corresponding national averages. The

average for those industries.

most effective way of achieving that is likely to be obtained

Chart 7.11 shows that there are six Tasmanian by theofpink by industries raising levels (represented of educational attainment new entrants to thethe Tasmanian workforce and, where possible, those bars) in which labour productivity is higher than national average for those can do about the first of these factors. For example, in already in the – given the strong correlation industries. However, as shown in Chart 7.12, only 34% ofworkforce working Tasmanians are the absence of any discoveries of significant quantities of between educational attainment and productivity, which employed in those industries.

76% of Tasmanian workers are employed in commercially recoverable mineral deposits, orConversely, oil or gas is evident in the earnings differentials between people with industries where labour productivity is less than the national averages for those fields, Tasmania is unlikely to have a larger mining sector different levels of education.

– including 20% whorelatively work industries where labour productivity is more than thanindustries it does at present.

Similarly, Tasmania’s small 25% below the national average for those industries.

There are some inherent constraints on how much Tasmania

Chart 7.12: Industry composition of employment in Tasmania according to labour productivity as a proportion of the corresponding national industry average, 2017-18 50 45

% of total Tasmanian employment

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Industries where Tas labour productivity is above the national industry level

Industries where Tas labour Industries where Tas labour productivity is up to 25% productivity is more than 25% below national industry level below national industry level

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; and Labour Force, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018.

There are some inherent constraints on how much Tasmania can do about the first of these factors. For example, in the absence of any discoveries of significant quantities of commercially recoverable mineral deposits, or oil or gas fields, T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 Tasmania is unlikely to have a larger mining sector than it does at present. Similarly,

91

THE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE GAP 9 It is unrealistic to anticipate that any of these ‘gaps’ could be

Drawing together the foregoing analysis, the difference of nearly $15,850 or 21% between Tasmania’s per capita gross

completely eliminated, given the smaller size and older age

state product and the national average in 2017-18 can be

profile of Tasmania’s population compared with other states

disaggregated as follows:

and territories, and its comparative lack of mineral resources.

The economic performance gap

However, it is both reasonable and feasible to seek to reduce

• about $5,950 (or 38%) was due to the employment

Drawing together the foregoing analysis, the difference of nearly $15,850 or 21% the size of these gaps – and indeed it is essential to do so between Tasmania’s per capita gross state product and the national average in in order to narrow the difference in material living standards of Tasmania’s population with a job was 3 percentage 2017-18 can be disaggregated as follows: between Tasmanians and other Australians. Tasmania has points below the national average in 2017-18; participation gap – that is, to the fact that the proportion

•

made some progress over the past four years in reducing about $5,950 (or 38%) was due to the employment participation gap – that is, to the first two of these gaps – and needs to continue doing so, as fact that theTasmanians proportion of Tasmania’s population with a job was 3 gap – the that is, to the fact that in employment well as aiming to make progress in reducing the third. percentage points national average in 2017-18; worked about 1.4 fewer hours perbelow week (or the 10 days per

• about $6,450 (or 41%) was due to the hours worked

As an illustration, if Tasmania could lift its employment about $6,450 (or 41%) was due to the hours worked gap – that is, to the fact that participation rate by 1 percentage point, average hours $3,350 (or 21%)in • aboutTasmanians was due to the labourworked productivity employment about 1.4 fewer hours per week (or 10 days worked by about half an hour, and productivity by 2%, all gap – per that is, to the than fact that employed Tasmanians year) the national average in 2017-18; and year) than the national average in 2017-18; and

•

produce, on average, nearly $11 (or 12%) less for each

else being equal Tasmania’s per capita gross product would

be about $1,780 (or 5¾%) higher thanis, it was 2017-18, • about $3,350 (or 21%) was due to the labour productivity gap – that to in the factto hour that they work than the average for the Australian be on a par with South Australia’s.

And if that flowed thatasemployed Tasmanians produce, on average, nearly $11 (or 12%) less for through workforce a whole. to household income in the sameas proportion each hour that they work than the average for thedisposable Australian workforce a This disaggregation is depicted in Chart 7.13. as in 2017-18, each Tasmanian would be around $1,350 per whole. annum better off, on average.

This disaggregation is depicted in Chart 7.13.

Chart 7.13: Components of the difference in per capita gross product between Tasmania and the Australian average, 2017-18 80

$000 per head

75 70 -$5,950 (37%)

65

-$6,550 (41%)

60 55 50

Gross product per capita Australia

Difference in employment / population ratio

Difference in average hours worked

-$3,350 (21%) Difference in labour productivity

Gross product per capita Tasmania

Sources: ABS, State Accounts (5220.0), 2017-18; and Labour Force, Detailed, Quarterly (6291.0.55.003), August 2018.

It is unrealistic to anticipate that any of these ‘gaps’ could be completely eliminated, given the smaller size and older age profile of Tasmania’s population compared with other states and territories, and its comparative lack of mineral resources.

92

However, it is both reasonable and feasible to seek to reduce the size of these gaps – Iand indeed it isR essential TCC TA S MANIA E P O R T 2to 0 do 1 8 so in order to narrow the difference in material living standards between Tasmanians and other Australians. Tasmania has made some

Chapter 8 LOOKING FORWARD

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

93

LOOKING FORWARD The analysis presented in this year’s Tasmania Report

By some benchmarks, Tasmanian living standards are now

suggests that Tasmania’s economy is, in most respects,

starting to improve relative to those in the rest of Australia.

performing better than at any other time in the past decade.

Economic growth is stronger, and more broadly-based, than at any time since the global financial crisis. On many indicators, Tasmania is now recording faster growth than the national average, or indeed the fastest of any state or territory. Moreover, this improved economic performance is now being reflected in higher levels of migration to Tasmania from both overseas and interstate, which is in turn providing a boost to economic growth.

While some of the impetus to this improved economic performance stems from favourable external developments (including a more competitive exchange rate, stronger

will require an ongoing focus on the principal economic drivers of material living standards – in particular, participation in employment, and productivity – and to the various ways in which the benefits of improved economic performance are shared throughout the Tasmanian community.

As this Tasmania Report and its predecessors have stressed, the single most important ‘enabler’ to improving Tasmania’s employment participation and productivity is higher levels of educational participation and attainment.

economic growth in Victoria and New South Wales, and an

The Government’s continuing emphasis on broadening

increased flow of revenue from the federal government), the

access to Years 11 and 12 at Tasmanian high schools is

Tasmanian Government is also entitled to a good share of

thus particularly appropriate – although this Report again

the credit. The Government’s management of Tasmania’s

argues that the ultimate goal should be the complete

public sector finances, its infrastructure investment

integration of Years 11 and 12 into high schools, as in every

program, and other policy settings have helped to

other state, rather than maintaining a parallel system of

maintain a consistently high level of business confidence,

separate colleges.

which has been in turn reflected in sustained higher levels of business investment.

94

It is crucial that this initial progress be sustained. Doing so

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

LOOKING FORWARD (CONTINUED) Consideration should also be given to ways of providing

That’s one reason why this Report argues that the

opportunities for Tasmanians who completed their formal

Government should consider a more ambitious agenda for

education in earlier decades to upgrade their capabilities

reform of the taxation system – including, as proposed in

and skills. The University of Tasmania, TasTAFE and

more detail here last year, broadening the base and lowering

other parts of the VET system could have expanded

the rate of payroll tax, and (over time) replacing stamp

roles in this context.

duties on land transfers with a more broadly based land tax.

In other respects this Report is broadly supportive of the Government’s economic development strategies and policies.

This Report has also noted that the Government is likely to face ongoing pressure for increased spending on health and affordable housing; and, potentially, demand for more spending on arterial roads, particularly in and around Hobart.

For the same reason, the suggestion of some kind of levy on visitor accommodation (to be passed on to tourists) as a way of partially funding tourism marketing campaigns, or additional infrastructure primarily used by tourists, merits further consideration.

There may also be a case for the Government to consider undertaking a moderate level of net borrowing in order to fund higher levels of infrastructure investment in response to

The Government may have some scope to accommodate

some of the pressures associated with more rapid economic

these pressures to the extent that faster economic growth

and population growth. As noted in Chapter 6, Tasmania’s

than assumed in the most recent state budget delivers

very high unfunded public sector superannuation liability

additional revenue. But because Tasmania’s state tax base

represents a significant constraint on how much it can

is relatively narrow, the revenue ‘dividend’ from stronger

prudently borrow for infrastructure investment. But that

economic growth may not be especially large.

does not necessarily mean that the optimal level of net debt for the Tasmanian general government sector is zero, especially if it can be rigorously demonstrated that the return on particular infrastructure investments is likely to exceed the cost of debt.

T C C I TA S M A N I A R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

95

How TCCI Membership Benefits your business JOIN TODAY

FROM AS LITTLE AS $399

The Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry is an independent membership organisation that positively leads and supports the Tasmanian business community.

TCCI provides valuable support to its members through advocacy and a range of programs and services including: • Customised membership to achieve your business objectives • Workplace relations advice and solutions • Workplace health and safety • Networking and promotion • Training and workforce development • Events

If you’re in business, big or small, we’re working for you.

1300 559 122 www.tcci.com.au

SOUTH

NORTH

Industry House

The Old Post Office

309 Liverpool Street

68-72 Cameron Street

WR Helpline 1300 765 123

Hobart 7000

Launceston 7250