A Goal Towards Walkability | Urban Expansion & Regeneration Planning Studio - LAP | CEPT University

A

Goal towards Walkability

Manifestation of Micro Planning

Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio 3rd Semester, Faculty of Planning, CEPT University

by Tamanna Parvin PG191039

Portfolio:3rdSemester,UERPStudio,CEPTUniversity

Preface Studios like UERP are like a bridge between theoretical and practical working. First of all, I would like to thank my parents, whom I am greatly indebted for bringing me up with love and encouragement to this stage. I feel obliged in taking the opportunity to sincerely thank Prof. Jignesh Mehta (Coordinator for UERP Studio, 2020) and special thanks to my Faculty in charge Prof. Harsh Vardhan Bhasin and Teaching Assistant Mrs. Shyamantika Sarkar for their invaluable guidance and inputs. I am also thankful to Prof. Utkarsh Patel & Prof. Amit Gotecha for their invaluable inputs which have always helped to look into the work from a third perspective. Moreover, I am highly obliged to take the opportunity to sincerely thank the planning department of CEPT University for their generous attitude and wonderful facilitation. At last but not least am thankful to all my friends who have encouraged me throughout the year. And I am thankful to everyone for being there for each other amidst this global pandemic of COVID-19 supporting each other in whatever way possible.

-Tamanna Parvin PG191039

Individual Contribution My contribution towards academic work has always been of a very holistic nature. I prefer to contribute my very best especially in a group work. In a group work it is not about achieving leadership stand, but about working & pushing each others limits to export the excellence present in every team member. I have taken in-charge of things wherever & whenever needed for the team, clearly leaving space for others to take the pedestal as well. My contribution to the team has been seamless which I strongly believe upon, i.e. the outcome of the group work should represent one unit and not four members individualistic contribution. On an individual level, I have tried to maintain clarity, quality & creativity of the work by not only just me, but also what the other members have contributed to.

Legend for level of Contribution Mix Effort in Group of 4

2

Leaded Effort in Group of 4

Partnered Effort with 1 member in Group of 4

Individual Effort in Group of 4

Individual Work

Contents

Journey towards learning Micro Planning

Exercise

1

• • • • •

Vision About Cost & Revenue Zoning & its layers Urban Analysis

Exercise

2

• • • • •

Site Context City Context Connectivity & Landmarks Market Feasibility Planning Feasibility

• •

Feasible Scenario Costing

Local Area

• • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Regional Context Metro Context Upcoming Potentials Area of Interest Potential for TOD Development Boundary Delineation Final Base map for LAP Existing Situation Analysis Way Forward Metro Station Analysis via 3D’s Vision & Objectives Concept Derivation Concept Plan Case Study for Walkability (Block sizes)

• • • • • •

Conceptual Street Network Proposed Street Network Zoning Masterplan Regulation Rationale Zoning Regulations Metro Station Area Development: Sector 13 Metro Station Metro Station Area Development: Sector 12 Metro Station Metro Station Area Development: Sector 11 Metro Station Metro Station Area Development: Sector 10 Metro Station Cost Estimation for the LAP Final Envisioned LAP Site for Dwarka

Planning

• • • • •

L

earning Outcomes

3

Exercise1:AreaDevelopmentModel|BatteryParkCity|NewYork

Battery Park City, New York

Area Development Model : Special Purpose District

Vision

Well-balanced community & Community renewal

Adaptable & sustainable quality design

About

Just over forty years ago, the land upon which the Battery Park City neighbourhood was built didn’t even exist.

This built-from-scratch planned community developed by Cooper Robertson in the 1970s and built upon landfill created with dirt and rock from Manhattan excavation sites like that of the original World Trade Center. The neighbourhood now boasts residential buildings, one of the largest public parks in New York City, and world class retail and commercial spaces.

Battery Park City Area : 0.39 km²

Cost & Revenue

Total cost of Infrastructure or development: • 1979 Spending cost: $115 M • 2018 Resiliency cost: $300 M Revenues: Generation p.a.: $100 M Sources of Revenues: •Leasing and subleasing of individual parcels •Bank Deposits, Investments, Rents and Other Receivables

4

•Bond Resolution Restricted Assets •Project Assets •Current and Non-current Assets •Liabilities

Financial Plan Operating Budget

Capital Budget

Revenue

Expenditure

Operating

Non-operating

Zoning & its layers 1

2

3

Zoning and Land Use Zoning Districts Commercial Districts Manufacturing Districts Residence Districts Parks Battery Park City Special Purpose Districts Special Purpose Subdistricts

Supporting Zoning Layers Sidewalk Cafes All Cafes Permitted Small Cafes Permitted Unenclosed and Small Cafes Permitted

1.BPC Special Purpose District Zoning Coastal Zone Boundary 2.BPC Special Purpose Sub-District Zoning 3.BPC Land-use Master-plan Basemaps

Urban Analysis

Seamless layers

Sunlight penetration & Vista Design

Conscious DCR’s

Subways Building Footprints

Built vs Open

Road Network

Blocks & Intersection 14m-18m 9m-14m 4m-9m 0-4m

Public Amenities Dead End (4) 2 Arms (55)

Public Land: Open Space & Recreation

3 Arms (52)

Private Mixed Use

4 Arms (43)

Private Use

5 Arms (3) Streets

Roads Public Amenities 5%

Blocks

37% 51% 12%

Community oriented public realms and inclusive design.

Almost 50% of the streets are non-vehicular.

Centreline/km²: 45.5 Intersections/ km²: 392 Avg Block size (km²): 0.004

27%

26%

4% 38%

Mixed use facilitates community enhancement

5

Exercise 2: Feasibility Study | Rourkela

Rourkela

Feasibility Study : Single Plot

Site Context

•Old Rourkela Market adjacent to the Railway station provides intensive commercial transactions.

•Old commercial establishments, shops & hotels have become landmarks over time.

•The Street front is so diverse that at every 100m there is a specific identity along the street edge.

City Context

Rourkela is a planned city located in the northern part of Odisha, India. The city is also the headquarters of Sundargarh district. It is the third-largest Urban Agglomeration in Odisha. It is situated about 328 kilometres north of state capital Bhubaneswar and is surrounded by a range of hills and encircled by rivers - Koel, Sankha, and Brahmani. The city is also popularly known as Ispat Nagar and also as the Steel City of Odisha. It has one of the largest steel plants of the Steel Authority of India Limited known as Rourkela Steel Plant. It also has one of the National Institutes of Technology(NIT) of the country. Rourkela is third largest city of Odisha state and is categorised as a Tier-2 city.

Connectivity & Landmarks

towards Sectors

Railway Station is 445m from site

The Crossroad Mall New Busstand

Towards Uditnagar which acts as a spillover of commercial activity from the old market

towards Bisra Bisra Munda Stadium

Old Market

Site (Uma Talkies) Petrol Pump Bisra Chowk

Ring Road Towards Panposh and Vedvyas

Hotel Radhika Bus Stand

6

City Node Autorickshaw Stand

0

200

400m

Planning Feasibility

Market Feasibility Surrounding Built Use

100% of the front plots along the streets are commercial (retail shops) in nature.

90% of the interior blocks are market complexes.

Land-use

Commercial

Plot Area

8927

Permissible FAR

2.50

Total Permissible Built-up Area

22,317.5

Permissible ground coverage

40%

Restaurants/Bars

Tentative Floor Plate area

3570.8

Hotels

Permissible Height as per FAR

6.25 ~ 6 floors

Banks

Setbacks on all sides as per Height

8m

Plot area available for development after removing area required for setbacks, common plots, ground coverage etc.

22,317.5 = 21,424.82 (6 floors) + 892.68 (0.25 floors)

Total Feasible/ Possible built built-up area for the site for different permissible uses (Considering all the regulations above ) Commercial and Mixed use

22,317.5

Shopping Centres

Market Value in surrounding area

Others

Occupancy

Retail Shop Hotel, Restaurants, Bar Apartments

100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%

Area (m²) / Factors

Parameters

Developer 1 Developer 2 Developer 3 Developer 4 Developer 5 Developer 6 Developer 7

Feasible Scenarios

Costing

Market Feasibility + Planning Feasibility = Scenarios Scenario 1 Hotel + Restaurants, Bar • High concentration of hotels and restaurants in the area indicate the demand for choices /options for hotels and restaurants • This location is accessible from all around the market area.

• Centre of the city Scenario 2 Shopping Centre + Multiplexes, entertainment • One stop solution • Overall experience of shopping & amusement Scenario 3 Business and professional offices + Bank • Proximity to Transport nodes • Business District • City centre

Development Scenario

Development Cost Revenue Estimate

Profit Estimate

92.8 crore Rs. 101.5 crore Rs. 116 crore

31 crore Rs. 40 crore Rs. 54 crore

Rs.

Scenario 1 Scenario 2

Rs.

61.7 crore

Scenario 3

Rs.

Recommendation

Scenario 2 seems best fit at this location

• • • • • •

Revenue from this kind of development will grow over the years.

The existing landmark and importance of being a commercial land as a cinema theatre can be utilized for attracting more public footfall.

No relevant Ground Coverage is given as per land use Height can depend on the access road No data for purchasable FAR. An area such a this can be beneficial to both parties with purchasable FAR. Floor to floor height can added.

7

TODTransformationforDwarka

Dwarka

TOD Transformation : Local Area Plan

Metro Context

Regional Context • • • • • • •

Dwarka in itself and regionally around is surrounded with suburban & urban village character.

South West Delhi Sub-city Diplomatic enclave Envisioned smart city Abundant Social Amenities Largest residential suburb in Asia Higher Growth trend amidst West Delhi Towards Najafgarh

Najafgarh Bypass

Upcoming Potentials Further expansion of Najafgarh Corridor NSUT Campus Habitat Centre Proposed International Sports Complex Diplomatic Enclave Cleaning Najafgarh Drain International Convention Centre Airport Line Extension “Dwarka, one of the three sub-cities devel-

oped three decades ago, is in for a revamp with the Delhi Development Authority working on a plan to resolve issues of traffic congestion, lack of commercial spaces and poor last mile connectivity.” - Anurag Jain, V.C., DDA

8

Delhi

Dwarka

Towards centre of Delhi

Towards Pankha rd

Towards Palam

Hangout Zone Dwarka City Centre Towards Najafgarh

Indira Gandhi International Airport

Towards NH8, Airport & Gurgaon

Blue Line Orange Line Grey Line 0

2 km

Potential for TOD Redevelopment

Area of Interest Considering the potentials & Metro Stations, this area is identified as viable for a holistic development.

Airport

Proximity to Gurgaon Mass Rapid Transit System Implementation of TOD policy in Delhi

Blue Line Orange Line Grey Line Metro Station

Boundary Delineation The area in the immediate vicinity of the metro station, for within a walking distance, having high density compact development with mixed land use to support all basic needs of the residents, is considered the Influence zone of metro station/ corridor.

Final Base map for LAP Site Area: 7.3 km² ≥50% area of a plot in the influence zone, plots were delineated accordingly.

4.6

m

1k 1.7

Amalgamating the influence zones into a corridor of 800m from the metro stations on each side.

m

80

0m

7k

9

TODTransformationforDwarka

Existing Situation Analysis Block Analysis Map

Actual Distance to be travelled

Land-use Map

1% 5%

19%

Metro Stop

Residential

25%

6% 1%

Source Commercial Vacant lands

Spatial Distance

10%

5% Open green (Majorly along Naala)

13%

12%

3%

Legend

LAP_Boundary

Perimeter

197m - 440m 440m - 766m

766m - 1235m

Missing Connections

1235m - 1950m

°

1950m - 3314m 0

0.25

0.5

1 Km

Average Block size: 957m (perimeter) Development Analysis Map

Higher land rate under commercial land use

Transaction along the metro corridor land is comparatively quite low.

Average FSI utilized : 2.25

Circle Rate Residential ₹ Plot

₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ 15 times

Institutional ₹ Plot

₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹

Commercial ₹ Plot

₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹

63% Of the land

Legend

is owned

by DDA

LAP_Boundary Level of Development No development Vacant >50% 50% or less

°

10

0

0.25

Market Rate

0.5

1 Km

39%

18%

30%

13%

>50% Developed

≤ 50% developed

Vacant

No development

Potential for redevelopment

Undeveloped Land

37%

13 times

8 times

Public

Built

Open 20% 17%

63%

Private Open

Way Forward Potentials Highly Feasible land under Metro Influence Area Concerns • Underutilised FAR • High vacancy • Low job density • Fixed uses of plots • High land prices • High ownership by DDA

Potentials Inter city road connectivity and high linkage Concerns • Larger block sizes • Missing links • Low pedestrian accessibility • Automobile oriented design of roads

Potentials Green & blue resourced Concerns • More emphasis on private open • Infrastructural challenges (nalla cleaning and sewage pipes) • Mismatched green network Potentials Active neighbourhoods Concerns • Disintegrated context to metro • Vacant lands surrounding the metro • Unsafe • Gated communities • Lack of active dedicated public realms

11

TODTransformationforDwarka

Metro Station Analysis via 3D’s a. Sector 13 Station

Density a

b

c

b. Sector 12 Station

d. Sector 10 Station

d

Built vs Open

33%

Public Open Built Private Open

50%

15% 21%

17%

36

DU / Hectare

62

1 hectare

10% 18%

65%

57

1 hectare

16% 2%

60%

60%

40

1 hectare

1 hectare

Open Space (m²) /capita

14.81

6.94

7.52

1.65

Job Density

364.13

204.22

110

797.13

a. Sector 13 Station

Diversity a

b

c

b. Sector 12 Station

c. Sector 11 Station

d. Sector 10 Station

d

Identified Dominant character(%) Residential Commercial Institutional Others

39%

25%

28% 23%

36%

0

0.26

Homogeneous

44%

49%

0 Entropy: Heterogeneity of Area Character

12

c. Sector 11 Station

1

Heterogeneous

26%

28%

28%

40%

1 0.1 6

0 0.13

34%

0 1

1 0.24

a. Sector 13 Station

Density a

b

c

b. Sector 12 Station

c. Sector 11 Station

d. Sector 10 Station

d

Mean Block Perimeter (m)

1050 m

Porosity

1040 m

Poor edges

1300 m

Most Active

935 m

Poor edges with higher block sizes

Poor edges inspite of having smaller blocks

Linkage to Metro Intersection Density (/ m²) Link to Node Ratio

4.17

4.17

1.59

3.38

1.19

1.14

0.87

0.94

Street Connectivity Footpath Yes

1.4 No

Inference a

b

c

a. Sector

Threshold

13

Station

1.4

b. Sector

1.4

12

Station

c. Sector

1.4

11

Station

d. Sector

10

Station

d

Dominant Character

Intensive job generation especially from commercial activities

Prominently Residential

Prominently Residential & Socio-cultural

Intensive job generation especially from Institutional entities

Metro Corridor Character

Inadequate Lighting

Poor Public realm

No eyes on the street

Non-porous edges

On street parking

13

TODTransformationforDwarka

Vision & Objectives • • • • • • • • • • •

• • •

• • •

14

TOD Principles Interconnected street network NMT Network Last mile connectivity Mixed land use Compact Development Value capture financing Affordable Housing Managed parking Making it a Regional Hub Supporting Job Generators Boosting the existing institutional hub Scope for Planned informal economy

Increase Walkability Interconnected green network Well designed pedestrian walkways Promoting Public Transport in intense Influence zone.

Vibrancy Mixed Use development along metro corridor Active Frontages Productive community spaces

Concept Derivation Layer 1: Commercial Belt facilitating TOD • Missing Links • Linear pattern • Extending the connections • Safe & walkable streets • Immediate link to the metro corridor

Layer 2: Station wise Urban Characters • Potential dominant character from 3D’s analysis is enhanced

Layer 3: Green Network • Linking the existing green land • Green linkage along the active edges to enhance the quality of life

Concept Plan High Intensity mixed use corridor Green corridor Mixed use 1 (MU1)

Low Intensity Moderate Intensity

Mixed use 2 (MU2)

Low Intensity Moderate Intensity

Mixed use 3 (MU3)

Low Intensity Moderate Intensity

Strengthening Street Network to Optimize block size Using Character Based Zoning to Promote Development

Improving Land Mechanism to Unlock Land Potential Using Form Based Regulations to create Active Edges

Metro Station area Development Initiating Placemaking to create Socio-cultural Centers

Integrating Green Blue Network

15

TODTransformationforDwarka

Case Study for Walkability (Block sizes) Little Rock, AR

Manhattan, NY

Portland, OR

Salt Lake City, UT San Francisco, CA

Street width

35m

29m

18m

18m

40m

20m

Block Size

105m

90m

182m x 76m

60m

200m

128m x 84m

Street Area

44%

42%

26%

41%

30%

30%

Street Frontage

25km

30km

32.5km

48km

17km

34km

Inference

800m x 800m

Austin, TX

Less Street width Convenient to cross From a tax perspective, the less area dedicated to streets, the better

Rectangular Block Size Smaller Block Perimeter Higher Attention Span Optimize shortest distance travelled

Length

Breadth

Commercial

120-180

80-100

Sector 13

Residential

200

100-150

Sector 12 & 11

Institutional

200-250

200-250

Sector 10

Conceptual Street Network Primary Street

Strengthen the central spine of the metro-to- metro connection to create TOD corridor. This will act as sub-arterial for PT users.

16

Secondary Streets

Tertiary Streets/ NMT Streets

These will facilitate direct connections to the metro stations(nodes) & parallel arterial roads to decrease the last mile connectivity by increasing walkability.

This creates the feeder network not only for improving the connectivity but also decrease the block sizes & facilitate green network along.

Proposed Street Network

Proposed Bi-cycle Network

Proposed Green Network

Secondary Street Primary Street

Primary Street • • • • • •

Re-designing the Metro corridor into Walkable street No private vehicular parking within 200m on either side of primary street Dedicated bus lane Green network along the road Active edge through placemaking Community activity space underneath the metro corridor in sector 11

NMT Street • •

Pedestrian cycling street Reducing block sides and redefining the connectivity

Existing Blocks

Proposed Blocks

Secondary Street • • • • •

Pedestrianised/cycling streets Green network along the road No on-street private vehicular parking Active edge through placemaking Bus /IPT Feeder network

Avg. decrease in Block sizes: 53%

17

TODTransformationforDwarka

Zoning Masterplan MU1

•

In zone, at least 50% of the total built up is developed as commercial, EDC charges shall be reduced up to Rs. 350/m².

•

zone, at least 40% of the total built up is developed as In residential, EDC charges shall be reduced up to Rs. 350/m².

•

In zone, at least 50% of the total built up is developed as institutional, EDC charges shall be reduced up to Rs. 350/m².

MU2 MU3

Regulation rationale PLANNING

Underutilized FSI

URBAN DESIGN

Non-Conducive Environment

No eyes on streets

MU1 Low Intensity MU1 Moderate Intensity MU2 Low Intensity MU2 Moderate Intensity High Intensity Mixed use MU3 Low Intensity MU3 Moderate Intensity Green Corridor

Underutilized land along the metro land

Higher land market rates deter development

Poor street Design

Zoning Regulations FSI

ZONE Base *Additional **Max. Permissible

HIGH INTENSITY

6 1.5 7.5

Dwelling- 3, Mercantile - 1,2, Educational- 1,2, Assembly- 1,2, Institutional, Religious, Hospitality, Permissible Uses Service Establishment, Transport, Public Institutional, Health- 1,2 and 3, Tourism Services

MODERATE INTENSITY

4 1.5 5.5

LOW INTENSITY

3 1.5 4.5

GREEN CORRIDOR

0.3 0 0.3

Dwelling-1,2 and 3, Mercantile 1,Educational 1 and Dwelling - 3, Mercantile 1 and 2, Educational 1 and 2, Assembly 1,2,3 and 4, Institutional, Religious, 2, Assembly 1,2 and 3, Institutional, Religious, Hospitality, Service Establishments, Storage, Religious, Temporary Use, Tourism Hospitality, Service Establishment, PublicTransport, Temporary Use, Public Utility, PublicServices, Recreational Use, Sports and Leisure Institutional, Public Utility, Heath- 1,2 and 3, Institutional, Health 1,2,3 and 4, Tourism Services, Tourism Services Recreational Use, Sports and Leisure

*Additional FSI can be purchased from DDA and or as TDR from plots within Dwarka **Affordable Housing will be incentivized by 1.5 additional FAR over and above the Max. Permissible FAR Floor Plate

18

Planning Regulations ZONE

HIGH INTENSITY

Side setback is to be applied after min.

8m frontage built

Setback (m)

• • •

Side setback not applicable to corner facing plot

Front

Side

Rear

Front

Side

Rear

Front

Side

Rear

0

3 100%

6

0

3 100%-Setback

6

NA

3 NA

3

Frontage Common Plot

LOW INTENSITY

MODERATE INTENSITY

Mandatory open space minimum 20% for public domain shall be followed according to the uses Only temporary construction shall be permitted in this space such as wholesale markets, vending stalls, community activities etc.

The open space shall be increased according to the uses

FSI

Design Guidelines ZONE

(6+1.5) 7.5

(4+1.5) 5.5

(3+1.5) 4.5

HIGH INTENSITY

MODERATE INTENSITY

LOW INTENSITY

* The area can be shaded and only temporary structures will be allowed to be erected in this step-back

Built- to- line (m) *Step- back (m) Arcade Porosity

Mandatory (In case of plots with two ROWs both the Mandatory (In case of plots with two ROWs both the sides have to follow the built- to-line setback) sides have to follow the built- to-line setback)

NA

min. Step-back

min. Height below

min. Step-back

min. Height below

min. Step- back

min. Height below

6m

15 m

4m

7m

3m

7m

clear width

6m

Clear depth

NA

6m

Façade Treatment

Compound Wall

Façade Treatment

Compound Wall

Façade Treatment

Compound Wall

70% transparent

Not Allowed

50% transparent

Not Allowed

NA

Permitted height 1.2m

19

TODTransformationforDwarka

Metro Station Area Development: Sector 13 Metro Station Metro Station/ Rail

Footpath

Bike Lane

Station Bay

Plaza / Public Realm

Existing Building

Vehicular road

Green Pockets

Proposed Building

Plazas enhance the socio-cultural needs

Barrier free design for pedestrians

1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed

Green Pockets maintains the ecological balance Café edges of the building improves public engagements in plazas

Skywalks giving access to commercial buildings & malls

Dedicated Vending zones in plazas enhances the public realm Bus & IPT Stop

20

Metro Station Area Development: Sector 12 Metro Station Proposed Recreation centre

Plazas enhance the socio-cultural needs

Barrier free design for pedestrians

Play Zones

Theatre (OAT)

1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed

Ensured shading for Bicycle Network Café edges of the building improves public engagements in plazas

Skywalks giving access to commercial buildings & malls

Dedicated Vending zones in plazas enhances the public realm Bus & IPT Stop

21

TODTransformationforDwarka

Metro Station Area Development: Sector 11 Metro Station Metro Station/ Rail

Footpath

Bike Lane

Station Bay

Plaza / Public Realm

Existing Building

Vehicular road

Green Pockets

Proposed Building

Green Pockets maintains the ecological balance

Barrier free design for pedestrians

1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed

Ensured shading for Bicycle Network

Skywalks giving access to community centre & Footpath

Redevelopment of Open setback areas into vending zones & market complexes for active edge

Bus & IPT Stop

22

Socio-cultural Amenities

Proposed Community Centre

Food Court & Exhibition

Metro Station Area Development: Sector 10 Metro Station Proposed City Centre

Green Pockets maintains the ecological balance

Barrier free design for pedestrians

Digital Library

Digital & interactive Museum

1 Bus lane + 2 private vehicle lanes; only dropoff allowed

Ensured shading for Bicycle Network

Skywalks themed around a walkway library towards city centre giving direct access

Redevelopment of Open setback areas into vending zones & market complexes for active edge

Bus & IPT Stop

23

TODTransformationforDwarka

Cost Estimation for the LAP

238

Crores

28 Crores

Road Network

49.2

Crores Projects

Infrastructure

For total Network addition of

91 Crores Affordable housing

405 Crores

50.47km

9 Crores

17 Crores

Water supply

Sewage

2 Crores

Storm water

Final Envisioned LAP Site for Dwarka COMPACT & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE & HETEROGENEITY TO INSTIGATE ACTIVENESS & MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSACTIONS

Unlocking Land Potentials

24

Enhanced Street Network

Nala Front Development

Station Area Development

Learning Outcomes

3 Semester, Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio rd

Description

Exercise

Exercise

1

2

Local Area Planning

Outcomes

Study of Development Models Case studies across India and international.

Research

Analyse

Practicality

Decision making

Livability

Affordability

Evaluate

Identify Development Feasibility of a Vacant Plot in your city.

Microlevel planning requires detailed understanding of different layers including land, real estate, environment, transport, infrastructure, cost and recovery etc.

Success of these plans depend on identifying right type of development model and mechanisms, and using them in right manner.

Devise a Local Area Plan for Dwarka in Delhi to rejuvenate & redevelopment the area contextually.

User Experience

25