Not gonna lie... ChatGPT wrote half of this.

Hi! I am Jaecarl Benedict D. Barcela and I’m writing a column article about you. Can you tell me who you are, what you do, and how you work?

I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI called ChatGPT. I’m based on the GPT-3.5 architecture. My purpose is to assist users like you in generating human-like text responses based on the prompts and questions I receive.

Regarding how I work, I have been trained on a vast amount of text data from the internet. This training data helps me learn patterns, understand language, and generate coherent and contextually relevant responses. When you provide me with input, I analyze the context and try to generate a response that makes sense within that context.

You say that you are “trained on a vast amount of text data from the internet”. Are you aware that students are abusing this? What do you think of it?

AI models like me can indeed be usedindividuals to generate outputs for various purposes, including academic work. While the availability of powerful language models has its advantages, it also raises concerns about plagiarism and ethical use. It’s essential for users to understand the ethical implications of their actions and adhere to academic integrity standards.

OpenAI is committed to addressing concerns related to AI misuse. They have acknowledged the need for responsible AI usage and have actively worked on research and development to improve AI guidelines and policies. OpenAI has been actively engaging with the research and user community to gather feedback and insights on the impact and risks associated with AI technology. They have also made efforts to make the development and deployment of AI models more transparent and understandable.

It’s ultimately the responsibility of users and educational institutions to establish guidelines and policies regarding the appropriate use of AI technology in academic settings. By promoting ethical practices and fostering a culture of integrity, we can ensure that AI tools are used in a responsible and beneficial manner.

“What is your message to the people using you to gain an advantage in academics?

To those who may be tempted to use AI models like me to gain an advantage in academics, I would like to emphasize the importance of integrity and ethical conduct. While it might be tempting to rely on AI-generated outputs, it is essential to recognize the value of genuine learning, critical thinking, and personal effort. Education is not just about achieving good grades or outcomes; it is about acquiring knowledge, developing skills, and fostering intellectual growth. Plagiarism and academic dishonesty not only undermine the learning process but also devalue the achievements of others. I encourage students to embrace the opportunities education offers, seek understanding, ask questions, and engage in honest and diligent work. By doing so, you can truly reap the rewards of knowledge and personal development, which are far more valuable in the long run than any shortcut or temporary advantage.

Isn’t it scary? How students can easily manipulate their schoolworks with the use of Artificial intelligence for their academic advancements (P.S. The conversation is a real and an unaltered conversation between me and my new best friend, ChatGPT.)

It’s a well-known fact that AI, also known as “artificial intelligence”, is developed for the better future of the world. However, when people abuse it, Is it still for the better?

I know a lot of you have heard of or even used ChatGPT before. Let me just ask you a question. Did you get a good grade from it? I’m guessing yes, given the fact that ChatGPT is literally de- veloped for academic writing.

The rapid growth of AI usage in the academic field is super concerning. The line between a smart student and a person who uses AI is becoming significantly blurry. Teachers nowadays are having a hard time grading papers. When a paper is really good, then they think twice because who knows? Maybe ChatGPT wrote it.

We have this classmate who’s actually a consistent honor student, even back then when we were elementary students. So, when he was consistently at the top of our class no one really questioned him.

Our teacher eventually caught up to his grand scheme. Catching him red handed as he forgot to close his ChatGPT tab on the library computer when he passed his paper. In his defense, he only took “inspirations” from ChatGPT and then paraphrased it.

Our teacher cannot believe that a consistent honor student cheated on a paper. She was so shocked to the point where she now has trust issues on whether a student actually created the paperwork or if it is created by AI. He eventually got removed from the list of awardees and got proper punishment.

However, is it fine? Have we accepted the fact that students are able to just let an artificial intelligence create his or her work for them? Although it allows students to create masterpieces in a span of three minutes, it also creates a culture of academic dishonesty.

I even heard one of my classmates say “mag ChatGPT nalang ako para sa reporting tapos kabisaduhin ko para madali”. It’s not fair to those who actually studied their reports. It’s not fair to the teachers who expect you to actually study your report.

As someone who came from Section One, with a bunch of unrealistic expectations pointed at me. I understand how it can be frustrating and draining for a lot of us to keep up with the never-ending backlogs. However, it does not justify cheating.

I thought we already established that cheating is cheating? People are quick to judge people by cheating on their spouses, then treats cheating on paper works as if it is morally right and a normal thing to do. I guess it’s natural since technology is advancing rapidly with society. But do not let your academic integrity to slip away like a bar of soap.

SOGIE Bill: A spectrum of expression

he Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity or Expression (SOGIE) Bill has been a topic of controversy and debate in the Philippines for several years now. By outlawing discrimination based on a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression and granting equal opportunity and legal protection, this bill seeks to protect the rights of the LGBTQ+ community.

One of the main objections to the Bill is that it violates the morals and values that are prevalent in traditional Filipino culture. Some of the bill’s

•Kassandra Yshi Dalida

Tdetractors contend that it encourages same-sex marriage, which they believe goes against the sacredness of marriage as it is outlined in the constitution.

The realities that the LGBTQ+ community must deal with are not acknowledged by these arguments. As many people are aware, there is a serious issue with discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in the Philippines. Filipinos experience harassment and discrimination at work, in the classroom, and even in their own families. Many people are at risk due to the absence of legal protection.

Have they forgotten that these people who are part of the LGBQ+ communi- ty are also part of their jurisdiction? Which literally conveys that these people deserve to be well protected as well. We are talking about basic human rights; they are not a luxury. For far too long, members of the LGBTQ+ community have endured suffering as a result of being a part of this community.

The Bill protects homosexuals while simultaneously shielding us from the prejudice they hardly ever face. They are rights that we all deserve, not privileges that should only be granted to those who have proven themselves deserving of a place where they can feel safe in the world.

As Bienvenido Abante Jr. filed a bill to protect heterosexuals, which aims to recognize, define, and protect the rights of heterosexuals, the

LGBTQIA+ rights advocacy group called it a “joke of a law.”

Abante’s presentation of LGBTQ+ rights as “special claims’’ is problematic because he ignores the fact that they are the exact same rights that heterosexual people already have. The demand is for equality, but HB 5717 is pure hatred. Abante then invokes Section 5 of Article III of the Constitution of 1987, which enshrines the right to the free exercise of religion. Abante, however, conveniently forgets that the very first part of that provision also contains the separation of church and state.

The Bill defends all Filipinos, regardless of their gender identification. The bill will be advantageous to everyone. It would just be redundant if the SOGIE Bill were approved in the state of Abante’s proposed heterosexual bill as well. It is time to pass the SOGIE bill, as it protects the LGBTQIA+ community in general.

Hontiveros and the other 18 senators deserve praise for their support of this legislation. Howls of shame are heard from the other five, who cannot comprehend reason and logic about how everyone has the same rights, regardless of gender identity.

I, as a part of the youth, am really hoping that our government realizes how important this is. Youth is the hope of the nation. By passing this bill, the Philippines is demonstrating its commitment to protecting and promoting human rights for all Filipinos.