Lady Chatterly’s Lover

Lady Chatterley’s Lover has remained prevalent since its original publication in 1928, acquiring seven film adaptations and a huge audience. Whether it is being analysed by students, acknowledged for its explicit depictions or watched on screen, it has succeeded to maintain its prominence in the public eye. Therefore, why is it that nearly 40 years since the last film adaptation (1985), have Netflix decided to revisit this tale and adapt the story once again?

The book originally gained mass exposure due to its explicit portrayals of sex, depicting a forbidden relationship between a lower-class man and upper-class woman, which was considered outrageous for its time and ultimately resulted in banishment under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. This banishment boosted the book’s popularity, keeping the story in the public eye and becoming one of the most famous banned books in the UK.

By Caitlin Holroyd

Reflecting on the book’s attention, the novel was first brought to screen in 1955 and although the most recent adaptation adheres to the original storyline and historic themes, there is an element of modernity about it.

Perhaps most recognisable for his role in TV series Skins, Jack O’Connell is an established British actor, renowned for his youthful and relatable character depictions. Therefore, his role as Oliver shows flexibility in his skillset, as a mysterious gamekeeper in a 19th century romance. The contrast from his usual work has modernised the adaptation, bringing in a younger audience and giving light to the novel once again. Similarly, Emma Corrin as Lady Chatterley may have brought across fans that have recently also seen them as Diana in The Crown. They depict Lady Chatterley in an empowering stance, presenting that being in control of sexuality is dynamic and not something that should be scorned (as done so upon original publication). In recent years Emma has particularly come into the spotlight, and their increasing number of central roles represents their talent and in turn, they are becoming a household name.

Although the Netflix adaptation has mostly adhered to the original storyline and themes present in the novel, the ending was adapted and made more resolute: Oliver receives a letter from Connie explaining her whereabouts and an invitation to be reunited in the Scottish Highlands. This addition to the narrative may be because Clermont-Tonnerre (director) felt the original ending was too ambiguous and it is common knowledge that audiences favour a happy ending. This ending also separates it from its counterparts, bringing a new dimension to the 2022 remake. However, it must be considered whether this is an injustice to the 1928 novel?

Twisting the ending to please audiences certainly doesn’t go unnoticed!

The blue-tinted colour palette reflects the sensitivity of the two characters and depth in their relationship, setting most of the film outside to enhance the space between their worlds, even though this space ironically aids their freedom.

Evidently, the tale of Lady Chatterley’s Lover continues to be popular, and Lawrence’s depictions and encouragement of free expression remain ubiquitous. Re-visiting the story in the 2022 film adaptation expresses just how far society has progressed, moving away from the negative connotations and restrictions surrounding sexual liberation to a much more accepting public sphere.