25 October 2024
scrippsvoice.com
Uncompromising commitment to inclusivity and justice. since 1991
Pomona bans 15+ Scripps students without warning over Carnegie Hall protest By Frances Walton '26 Editor-in-Chief
S
ince Oct. 15, Pomona College has banned 15+ Scripps College students, citing their “presence during the events inside Carnegie Hall” following the Oct. 7 walkout for divestment in solidarity with Palestine. The ban letters, signed by Pomona College President G. Gabrielle Starr and emailed by Dean of Students Avis Hinkson, came as a shock to three banned Scripps students interviewed by The Scripps Voice, all of whom requested anonymity due to the uncertainty of further disciplinary sanctions. “This campus ban prohibits you from entering any and all property of Pomona College … for any reason, 24 hours each day, and will be in effect for the remainder of the 2024-2025 academic year,” the email stated. “This prohibits you from participating in classes or any other activities in person.” The ban letters leaked to TSV did not provide evidence of the students’ presence in Carnegie Hall nor detailed reasoning for the ban beyond their presence inside the building. Starr and Hinkson did not respond to TSV's interview request. “The most far-reaching violation of the individuals thus sanctioned by the College was their involvement in the takeover of a building, the forced end of classes and the disruption of our academic mission,” Starr wrote in an Oct. 23 email to Pomona community members. “This takeover created an environment that was fundamentally dangerous, restricting entrance and exit for Carnegie, and even leading to students leaving the building by the windows.” The banned students interviewed felt that their presence inside Carnegie Hall was not egregiously disruptive, given that no member of the classes inside the building appeared visibly upset while leaving. One banned student said the protest organizers “said that it wasn't an occupation of the building, like we were just there.” A Scripps student who witnessed the building takeover from outside said that the people in Carnegie Hall could leave, and all three banned students agreed they were never locked in the building. “I saw multiple students leave their classes through the main entrance, and they were not blocked at all,” the student said. “They were completely
IN THIS ISSUE Quiet But Not Silenced: Denison staff speak on increased security
Frances Walton ’26 • The Scripps Voice
free to leave and no one was talking to them, there was no issue at all. So there's this crazy narrative that's being spun that kids had to climb out of windows. They chose to do that.” All three of the banned students remember being filmed at some point during the protest. The banned students speculated that Pomona College identified them based on videos from other students, professors, or news organizations. “These people kept barging in [Carnegie] and trying to shove past people to record us,” a banned student said. Given the reasoning for their bans, some found this speculated method of identification to be inappropriate and hypocritical. “[Pomona] was like, ‘oh, your behavior was disrespectful, and people were afraid,’ a banned student said. “And, I put in my letter that people were afraid of me as a person of color — imagine how I felt right when people were coming in shoving cameras in my face. Hello, I wouldn't do that to anyone. I think that's a crazy violation of someone's personal space, even if this was somebody that I vehemently disagreed with.” Two of the three students remembered being filmed inside Carnegie. They felt that if Pomona College based their bans on presence inside the building, Pomona should hold the people recording to the same stan-
dards. “Then [one recording student] submitted them to the Claremont newspaper, fully knowing that people would get doxxed, that their educations would be ruined, and she's glad for it, and nothing will be taken against her,” the student witness said. “Like, damn, she was there too … She disrupted the building more. She was pushing past people. Not a single physical or like verbal confrontation was started by one of the protesters. Not a single one.” The banned students took advantage of the option to appeal the ban given in the ban letter — some were quickly met with rejection. “I received the ban notice last Tuesday, the last day of fall break right when I got back to Claremont,” a banned student said. “I immediately started working on an appeal letter. I sent that off Thursday afternoon, and then I found out on Friday night that it was rejected.” Pomona College upheld the three students’ bans after their requests for appeal. In their letters, all three students detailed their peaceful involvement and emphasized that they were unaware of the vandalism. “A large portion of my appeal letter was genuinely explaining my side of the story,” one banned student said. “I have no idea what evidence they have against me, and I know that folks have reached out and asked for
The Core of the Core Kerfuffle: The Core Restructuring Committee Names a New Director
The Post Keckxit Era: Student Experience in Newly Formed Science Departments
[it] and they won't give it. … I honestly didn't know that [vandalism] occurred until I left. To me, that should have been evidence enough to appeal the ban … The response was that just by being there, I should be held responsible for what someone else did.” Hinkson found the students in violation of The Claremont Colleges Demonstration Policy, which states, “If an officer or designee of an affected college or The Claremont Colleges Services informs individuals in a given area that their collective actions are judged non-peaceful or disruptive and that they should disperse, individuals remaining may be charged on their home campus with a violation of this policy.” However, the banned students said they left Carnegie Hall before or immediately after 2:32 p.m. when Campus Safety emailed Scripps students requiring all occupants to leave. All three affirmed that no Campus Safety officer or school official told them to disperse until receiving the email. “I have literal evidence that I was back in my dorm by 1:00 p.m.,” a banned student said. “It's frustrating, and I understand that I made that choice, but it's a disproportionate response.” At the request of Scripps Associated Students President Melina Durre Continued on page 4
The Art of Nature: A Guide to Butterflies in Claremont
1030 Columbia Avenue | Claremont, CA 91711 | scrippsvoice@gmail.com | Volume XXXIII | Issue Four