2ژﺍﻧــﻮﻳﻪ 2012
ﺳــﻔﺮﺓ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻣﺴــﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﺎﺕ« ،ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻋﻀﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗــﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ! ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴــﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ »ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻯ« ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺍء ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﺓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﭘﺲ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ، ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ. ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﻕ »ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ« ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﻳــﻦ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﺩﻣﻴﺪﻧــﺪ ،ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳــﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴــﻪ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺔ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﺡ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺑــﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﺷــﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﻣﺴــﺘﺒﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠــﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ »ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳــﺒﺰ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ »ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ« ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ »ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ« ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﮔﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺑﻰﻣﻌﻨﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﻼﺋﻰ« ﺑﻴﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ .ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻞ »ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ« ﻓﺮﻳﻀﺔ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺸــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺳــﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻮﺑﻴﺪ ،ﻭ »ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ« ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻫــﺎ« ،ﻛــﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺎﻟــﻰ ،ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓــﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻗﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳــﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻴﻦ« ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﺱ »ﺁﺭﺍء ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ! ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﭽﺔ ﻣﻔﺘﻀﺢ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺭﻓﺮﺍﻧﺪﻭﻡ«، »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ...ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ »ﺭﺃﻯ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ« ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻬﺮﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴﻢ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ »ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳﺒﺰ« ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ« ﻭ »ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ« ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ .ﻭﻇﻴﻔــﺔ »ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ« ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻯ ﻧﻘﺶ »ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻰﻟﺸﻜﺮ« ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ »ﺑﻰﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ« ﻭ ﺑﻰﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ. ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻼﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ، ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺣﻜﻤﻴﺖ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ »ﺁﺭﺍء ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ! ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ »ﺭﺃﻯ« ﻭ »ﻧﻈﺮ« ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻃﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﺑﺮﻭﺑﻴﺎﻯ« ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺴــﺖ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺁﻧﺰﻣــﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺘــﻜﺎﺭﺍﺕﺍﺵ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ »ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴــﺔ 8ﻣﺎﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ« ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ ،ﺁﻧﺎً ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ »ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴــﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻗﻼﺩﻩﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎً ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺩﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸــﻤﻮﻝ« ﺁﻥ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ،ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ »ﺗﺰﻫﺎﺋﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﻭ »ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ« ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﺔ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻭﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻚ ﺁﺭﺍء ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ .ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ .ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺤﻮﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭ ﺁﺩﻣﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺘﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺃﻯ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﺎﻳﻖ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻮﻛﺮ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴــﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ »ﭘﺲ« ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺧﻨﺎﻕ« ﻣﻰﺯﺩ ،ﻛﻪ »ﺟﻨﮓ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻔﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ »ﻛﻔﺮ« ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣــﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ،ﻛــﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﺔ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ،ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻨﺘﺴﻜﻴﻮﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻠﻮﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ. ﭘﺲ ﺑﻰﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻤﻪﺷــﺐﺑﺎﺯﻯ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪ ،ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ .ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ »ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻰﻟﺸﻜﺮﻯ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﻬﺮﺓ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﺎﺕ »ﺧﺮﺩﺭﭼﻤﻦ« ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺿﺪﺑﺸﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﻴﻦ »ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﻋﺎﻇﺎﺩﻯ« ﻭ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻧﺎﺑﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑــﻪ ﻧــﺎﻡ »ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ« ﻓــﻮﺕ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻴﺦ ﻛﺮﺍﻭﺍﺗــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧــﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ »ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ« ﻓﺮﻭﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ .ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺒﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ »ﺭﺃﻯﺳــﺎﺯﻯ« ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ
»ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﺓ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷــﺔ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻳﺨﺖ ﻭ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺠﺮﺕ« ﻣﻰﻧﻮﺷﺖ! ﺧﻼﺻﻪ، ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻛﻬﻦ« ،ﺩﻭﻥﻛﻴﺸﻮﺕﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺸــﺘﺎﺑﻨﺪ؛ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﻬﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻻﺷﺔ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﻔﻦﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻌﺮ ﻣﻨﺠﻼﺏ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ »ﺭﺃﻯﺳــﺎﺯﻯ« ﻭ »ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﺑﺎﺯﻯ« ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﺟﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻯ »ﻣﻮﺵ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺑﺔ« ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻧــﮓ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ »ﺑﺤــﺚ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﮕﻮﺋﻰ« ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻓﺼﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ! ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻯ« ﻣﻬﺮﺓ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ،ﺳﺮﺩﺳــﺘﺔ ﻗﻮﺍﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺯﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻤﺎﻕﻛﺸــﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﻭ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫــﺎﻯ »ﺭﺃﻯ!« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻏــﺮﺏ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ »ﺗــﻚﺭﻭﻯ« ،ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ »ﺟﺎﺑﺠﺎ« ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺷــﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺳــﻬﻢ »ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﻰ« ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﺓ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﻭ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺟﺎﻟﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤــﻪ ،ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﻧــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ« ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱﺷﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﭘﻮﺳﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﻠﺐ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻭﻳﮋﺓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ« ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺥﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻴﺦﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ .ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻫﻢﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴــﻬﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺷﺸﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻨﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻛﺒــﺮ ﺑﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺑــﺰﺭگﻻﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ« ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖﻫﺎ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺸــﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ،ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ »ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻯ« ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘــﻪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻛﻠﺔ »ﺑﺰ ﺳﺮﮔﻠﺔ« ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻻﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻂﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺁﺩﻣﻜﺸــﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﻋﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴﻴﻦ »ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﺟﺒــﺎﺭﻯ« ﻭ ﺩژﺧﻴــﻢ ﺯﻧــﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻨــﺎﻥ »ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ« ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻧﻌﻞﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧــﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺗﺎ ﻏﺮﻏﺮﻫﺎﻯ »ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ« ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ »ﺗﻌﺮﺽﻫﺎﻯ« ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﻰ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺷــﺒﻪﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﺋﻰ ،ﺭﻭﻯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ »ﺑﻬﺸﺖ« ﺑﺮﻳــﻦ .ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳــﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﻫﻤﻴــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻬﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﻨﮓﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫــﺎﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪﺍﺵ »ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ« ﻧﻤﻮﺩ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ. ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﺎﻥﺍﺵ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ »ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ«
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻰﺭﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖﺧﺎﻡ ﻭ ﮔﺎﺯﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﮕﻮﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ »ﻗﻴﻤﺖﮔــﺰﺍﺭﻯ« ﻛﻨــﺪ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭼﺸﻢﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺭﺯﻯ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤ ً ﻼ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ؛ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ، ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﺑﻰﺭﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺔ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﻓــﺮﺍﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ »ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ« ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ. ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺴــﺘﺠﻮ ﺷــﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻭﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﺣﺎﺝﺍﻛﺒــﺮ ﺑﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﺣﺮﺍﺝ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﺸــﻜﻪﺍﻯ 10ﺩﻻﺭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺳــﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ »ﻃﺮﺡ« ﻭ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺁﻧﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺕﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯﺟﻤﻌﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺍﺵ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ،ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﭘﻴﻐﻤﺒﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ« ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧــﺪ »ﻋﻤﻠــﻰ« ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻧــﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﻂ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺍﺵ ﺗﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ! ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﺴــﻦ ﺧﺘﺎﻡ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ »ﺷﻴﺮﺗﻮﺷﻴﺮ« ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﺑﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻃﻨﻰ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟــﺐ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻛــﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳــﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻛــﺖ ﺍﻭﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﻭ »ﻣﻨﻄﻖ« ﻓﻮﻕ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﻫــﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺘﺎً
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸــﻰ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭﻯ ،ﺟﺰ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﻼﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻼﺋﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﺯﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﺖ؛ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﮔﺎﻩﺷﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻬﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺤﻠﻞ« ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻩﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ـ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ« ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻼ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺿﻪﺧﻮﺍﻥﻫــﺎﻯ ﺧﻂﺍﻣﺎﻡ ،ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻣﻠﻰ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺳــﺒﺰ؛ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻜﻴﻢ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻦﺧﻮﺋﻰ، ﺑﺎﻭﺭﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ،ﺯﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰﻯ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﻭﺩﺍﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﺔ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻛﻬﻨﺴﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﻌﺒﺔ ﺭﺃﻯﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪ؛ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﻦﺍﻳﻢ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ.