16ﺩﺳـﺎﻣـﺒﺮ 2011
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ 10ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ ،2011ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻴــﺎﺩ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ« ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ. ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮﺍﺕ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺠــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ، ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﺔ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ« ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﻟﻮﺣﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ» ،ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﺔ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﺓ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ« ،ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺍﺳﺖ«» ،ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ« ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ،ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺘﻰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ »ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ« ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﻯ »ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺩﺭﺟﻪ« ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ؛ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ. »ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ« ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﺔ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﻳﻮﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻯ »ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ« ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺳﺎﺯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﺋﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻴﺐ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺷــﺎﻥ
ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ! ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯﻯ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ »ﻣﻄﻠﻖ« ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑــﺮ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺧــﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ »ﺷﻤﺸــﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻰﺑﻨﺪﻧﺪ« ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻛــﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ »ﻫﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻯ »ﺍﻣﺎﻡ« ﻣﻰﻛﻮﺑﻨﺪ ،ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻣﻠــﻰ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻮﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺯﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺖ ﻭ »ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ« ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺟﺎ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑــﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ »ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ« ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ! ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ »ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ« ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ« ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺑﻰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﺯﻩﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ؟ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ »ﺿﺪﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖ« ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴــﭻ »ﺭﻓﻴﻘﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺣﻖ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ »ﺟﺎﻧﻰ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ. ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺑﻠﺸﻮﻳﺴﻢ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ،ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺯﺩ ،ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ »ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ـ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ »ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥ« ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻰ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﭼﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺩﻣﺠﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻗﺎﺏﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﺓ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ؛ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ،ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﻳﻜﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ »ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ« ﺷﺪ. ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﻣﻚﺁﺭﺗﻮﺭ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﺷــﺒﻪﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﻓﻰﻣﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ! ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ 800ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻭﻯ ﻣﺎﺋﻮﺋﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ .ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ »ﺿﺪﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ« ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ« ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺗﺴــﻬﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﻮﺋﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚﺍﺵ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻛﺸــﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺰﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ« ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ »ﻧﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺑﺪ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ» .ﻧﻴﻚ« ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻮﻣﺎﻥﻛﻼﺗﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» ،ﺑﺪ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﺔ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻛﻠﻰﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﻜﻠﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ. ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺔ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ،ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻕ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﺮﺿﻴﻪ، ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﺧﭙﻮﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﭘﺎچ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨــﺪ .ﻫــﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺕ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻗﻮﻛﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻚﺷﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺗﺒﺔ »ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺩﺭ«» ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ«، »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﻰ« ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ! ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺳــﭙﺎﺭﻭﻑ ﺷــﻄﺮﻧﺞﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻮﺩﻭﺭﻛﻮﻓﺴــﻜﻰ ﻧﻔﺘﺨــﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﭽﻨﻰ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ »ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ« ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ! ﺑــﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚﺩﺍﻥ ،ﻃﺒﻴﺐ ،ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮ، ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺘﺤﺪ« ﻏﺮﺏ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﻣﺘﺤــﺪﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﺓ ﻗﻮﺍﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺍﻥ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ« ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺒــﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ »ﮔﺰﻳﻨــﺶ« ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ» ،ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﺎﻧﻪ« ﻭ »ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ« ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ. ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ »ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ« ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺟﺰ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪﺩﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﺭﻳﻪﮔﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻧﺎﻣﺎﺋﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻮﺱ ﻓﻴﻠﻴﭙﻴﻨﻰ ،ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻴﺨﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺏ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ ،ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﭼﻰ ﻣﺼﺮﻯ ،ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﻳﺴــﺘﺔ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ »ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ« ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻏﺮﺏ.
ﻭﻟــﻰ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻠﺒﺸــﻮﻯ ﻳﻠﺘﺴــﻴﻦ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﮕﺎﺭﺷــﻰ »ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘــﻰ ـ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﺔ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸــﻮﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺻﺤﻨﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ »ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻏﺮﺏ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺷﻤﺸــﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺒﻪ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ »ﺣﺴﻨﻪ« ﺑﺎ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﺧﻮﺵ« ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻟﻴﻦ ،ﭘﺮﺩﺓ ﺁﻫﻨﻴــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻛﮋﺭﻭﻯﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳــﺘﻴﺰﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺸﻴﮕﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺕ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ« ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﺔ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ 8ﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺔ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳــﻢ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺟﻼ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ .ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ« ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ »ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ« ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺥ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺭﺍ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺬﺍﻓﻰ ﻭ ﺷــﻴﺨﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺏ ﺗﺒﺪﻳــﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻓﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺮﺩ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﺋﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ،ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﻴﺪﻧﺪ؛ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺷﺘﺔ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ، ﻭ »ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺩژﺧﻴﻢ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﻛﺶ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺑﺸــﺮ .ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩژﺧﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺷــﺐ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻰﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻮﺱ، ﺷــﻴﺦ ﺯﻫﺮﻣﺎﺭ ﺁﻝﻛﺎﭘﻮﺕ ،ﻭ ...ﻭ »ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭ« ،ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺯﺩﻯ ﻭ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﺩﺯﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻨﺸﻴﻦ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﺯﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻨﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ »ﻣﺴﺘﺒﺪ« ،ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ »ﻣﺘﻘﻠــﺐ« ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ »ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﭘﻠﻴﺪ« ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ! ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ »ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﭘﻠﻴﺪ« ،ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣــﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﻨــﺪ؛ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ ﺟﺰ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ. ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺏﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ. ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺩﻩ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﮔﺰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺟﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﻟﻮﺡﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴــﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﻭ ...ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄــﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﺓ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺥﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﺤــﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ .ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ، ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ،ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﺍء ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻭ ...ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻜﻮﻫﻴﺪﻩ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰﺍﺵ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﮕﻮﻯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﺋــﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ »ﻭﻳﻨﺴــﻨﺖ ﻓﺎﻛــﺲ« ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ »ﻛﻮﻛﺎﻛﻮﻻﻯ« ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﺸــﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ »ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ« ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﺥﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﺋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ »ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺒﻬﻜﺎﺭ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﻧﻈﺎﻣــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﻓﻀﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ »ﺍﻑ .ﺑﻰ .ﺁﻯ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺎﭼﺎﻕ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﻳﺪﻙ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ،ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺑﻰﻗﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻁ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﻰﺍﺵ، ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻻﻳﻨﺤﻞ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﻌﻀﻞ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﭘﺮﺩﺓ ﺁﻫﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﮕﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰﺍﺵ ،ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺭﻗــﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ! ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ،ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﻌــﻜﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﭘﺮﻭﺳﻪ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸﻮﺭ. ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎً ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻫﻢﻣﺮﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻯ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺳــﺖﻭﭘﺎ ﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣــﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﮓ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ »ﻣﺼــﺎﺩﺭﻩ« ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ» .ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎﻯ« ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ« ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺟــﺰ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺯﺭﮔﺮﻯ«؛ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺰ ﺩﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻥﭘﻨﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻯ »ﻛﻠﻰﮔﻮﺋﻰ« ﻭ »ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨــﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻣﺎﻍ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ« ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ »ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ« ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺝ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ؛ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ،ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻔﻠﻮﻙ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﻳﺸــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ »ﺗﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ« ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ! ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻭﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ،ﺍﺯ ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺁﺩﻣﻜﺶ، ﺍﻧﮕﺸــﺖ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧــﺪ .ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺳــﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ! ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻃﻰ 33ﺳﺎﻝ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ؟ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻤﻦﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻴﮕﺎﺭﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ، ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻻﻫﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ »ﻋﻔﻮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ« ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ: »ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺎﺩﺭﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻭﻯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ]«[... ﻣﻨﺒﻊ :ﻓﻴﮕﺎﺭﻭ 14ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ 2011 ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﺸــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻔــﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺟــﺰ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﻪﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤــﺎﺵ »ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰﺩﻭﺳــﺘﻰ«» ،ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳــﺒﺰ« ﻭ ...ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﺓ »ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ« ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻔﻠﻮﻙ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﻧﻜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻃﻰ 33ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺿــﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺤﺎً ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» ،ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ!« ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳــﻢ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺳــﻴﺮﻭﺱ ﭘﻬﻠــﻮﻯ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺤﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ« ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺟﺎﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ »ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻫﻮﻳﺪﺍ« ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﺵ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻦ ﺗﻐﺎﺭ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ« ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻛﺎﺩﺭﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ »ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ« ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ. ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ »ﻓﺮﺿﻰ« ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ! ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻗﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻮ »ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﺔ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺵ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﻜــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻜﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻠﺸﻮﻳﺴﻢ ﺭﻭﺱ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ .ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﻏــﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ،ﻧﺒــﺮﺩ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻰ» ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﻭ »ﺭﻓــﺮﻡ« ﻭ ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺽ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ »ﺣﻖﺳﻜﻮﺕ« ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻢ ﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻟﺐﺗﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ ـ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﮔﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺳﺮ ﻭﺻﺪﺍﻯﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ـ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ،ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﻞﻭﭘﻼﺱﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ.