9ﺍﻛﺘـﺒﺮ 2011
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ »ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻰ« ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ »ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ، ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﺍﺯﻳﻢ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﮕﺎﻩ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﺎﻛﺶ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺪﻳــﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺳﺎﻳﺔ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ. ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﭘﺮﺍﻧﺘﺰ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ« ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﻪ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ، ﺩﻳﻤﻴﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺟﺰ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺔ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ، ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤــﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻧــﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﺸــﻰ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﻏﺮﺏﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺔ« ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﻯ
ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴــﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻨﺎﻳــﺖ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘــﻪ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣــﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰﺍﺵ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﺔ »ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ« ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺎﻟــﻰ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺑﺪﻩﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨــﺔ »ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ« ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﭼﺸﻢﮔﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺷــﻰ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﻧﻔــﻮﺫ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﻪﺍﺵ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺗﺮﺷﺮﻭﺋﻰ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﺔ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ »ﻣﻮﺷﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﺮﺩ« ﻭ ﻛﻼﻫﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻫﻨــﻮﺯ ﺍﺟــﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺳــﻤﺎً ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ،ﺩﻳﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻭﺩ »ﻳﻘﻪﮔﻴﺮﻯ« ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ. ﻓﺮﺍﻣــﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ« ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺑــﻮﻕ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘــﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻓﻠــﻚ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻓﻘــﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻫــﺪﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ :ﺗﻔﻬﻴﻢ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻠﻖﺍﷲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ »ﻣﻘﺼﺮ« ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ! ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﻘﺼﺮ« ﺩﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺟﺰ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ! ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ» ،ﭘﺎﺩﺯﻫﺮﻫﺎﻯ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ؛ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ! ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺧﺸﻰ ﺗﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﺪﻳــﺪﺓ ﮔﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﺔ ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻛﺸــﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭﺗﻮﻯ ﺗﻨﺪ، ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺭﻭﺩﺭﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻰﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﭘﻜﻦ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻴﺰ »ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ« ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﻮﺑﻰ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﺁﻗﺎﺑﺎﻻﺳﺮﻯ« ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ« ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ. ﺗﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ،ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﻛﻤﺪﻯ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻــﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ »ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﺔ »ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻰ« ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻧﮕﻴﻦﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ »ﻣﺘﻴﻦ« ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ »ﺑﻨﻤﺎﻳﺪ« ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﮔﺎﻭﭼﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺥﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ
ﺟﻮﺍﺋﺰ ﻧﻮﺑﻞ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ، ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﺭﺳــﻮﺍﻯ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀــﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﻣﻮﻫﺎﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ـ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ـ ﺳــﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺨﺖ ﭘﻮﺷــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ« ﻧﺎﺋﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ »ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ـ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ« ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ. ﻓﺮﺍﻣــﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻭ ...ﻭ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ً ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺔ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻨﺘﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ،ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻔﺮﻳﺐ »ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ« ﻭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﺔ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﻣﺜﻨﻮﻯ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺗﻮﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﭘﻜﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ »ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ« ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﺍﺵ ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﻏــﺮﺏ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ »ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ـ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ« ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﺑــﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ،ﺑﻬﺎﻧﺔ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ »ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ« ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ »ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ« ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺮﻫﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ »ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ« ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ »ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻢ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ« ،ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺓ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖﻭﭘﺎﺧﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺟﻠﻜﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴــﻢ ﺁﺩﻣﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﻍ ﻣﻰﻛــﺮﺩ؛ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ،ﻣﺪﺕﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺓ« ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴــﻢ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ »ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﻧﺮﻳﺰ« ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﭼﺴــﺒﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻭﺗﻮﻯ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺗﻮﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺍﻳــﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ »ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ« ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ،ﺩﻫﻠﻰﻧﻮ ،ﭘﻜﻦ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﺒــﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻧﻘﺸــﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ »ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ!« ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ »ﻭﺍﻝﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺳــﺔ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ .ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ »ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ« ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ،ﺑﺎﻍ ﺩﺍﺧــﻞ ﺭﺍ »ﺁﺑﻴﺎﺭﻯ« ﻧﻤــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻏﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﻨﺪ. ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﻬــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ »ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻯ« ﺑــﺰﺭگ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺮﮔــﺰ »ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ« ﺻﺪﻫــﺎ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﮔﺮﺳــﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ »ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﻪ« ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭﻯﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ »ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺿﺪﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ« ﺑــﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺁﺏﻭﺗﺎﺑﻰ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ« ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ! ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺵﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﻴﻢ؛ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻗﺒﺎﺳﻮﺧﺘﮕﻰ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ. ﺧﻼﺻــﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺷﺴــﺘﻪ ،ﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﻰﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﺔ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻃﻠﺐﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻰ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯ« ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﻳﻨــﺎﻥ »ﺣﺒﻞﺍﻟﻤﺘﻴﻦ« ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ« ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺑﻜﺸﻨﺪ؛ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻰ. ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ »ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ـ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ« ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴــﺖ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ،ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ »ﺷﻤﺎﻝ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ »ﺟﻨﻮﺏ!« ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺗﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ،ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ »ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ« ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﻘﺮ ،ﺗﻨﮕﺪﺳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ »ﺟﻨﻮﺏ« ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ً ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﻳﺎﻧﻮﻭﺳﺘﻰ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 7ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ: »] ]...ﻣــﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ«. ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ، ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺧﻮﺷﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ »ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ـ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ« ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ »ﺩﻻﺋﻞ« ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔــﺖ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ ﺷــﺮﻡﺁﻭﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﺘﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ »ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ« ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ »ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ« ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺪ، ﭼﻴــﻦ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﺎً ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭ« ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻭ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ »ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ـ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ« ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ، ﺍﻳــﻦ »ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ« ﻳﻚ ﻃﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ. ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊﺍﺵ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻤــﻞ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﻳﻜﺼﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ »ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫــﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ »ﻧﻮﻳﻦ« ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺑﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﺓ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﻢ
ﭼﻨــﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ،ﺑﺨﻮﺑﻰ »ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ« ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ »ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺩﺑﺎﺭﻯ« ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻦﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ »ﻃﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺮﺯﺍﻯ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺗﺸﻴﻴﻊ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺓ ﺭﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺳﻤﺎً ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» ،ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ« ،ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ »ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻧﻰ« ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ »ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ« ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪﺍﺵ ﺯﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ! ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﺍﻡﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ« ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ »ﺑﻰﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺗﻮ« ﻭ ﺟﺎﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻖﺍﺵ ،ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻰﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺗﻮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ. ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ »ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺯﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺤــﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪ. ﺭﺋﻴــﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ»ﻃﺎﻟﺒــﺎﻥﺯﺍﺩﻩ« ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﺍﻟﻤﺴــﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎﻻﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﺷﺪ! ﻃﻰ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺯﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻠﻰﻧﻮ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣــﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ ـ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ« ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ! ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻛﺮﺯﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺗﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ »ﻛﻨﺎﺭ« ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ. ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺷــﺘﺎﺑﺰﺩﻩ ﻓﻘــﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻻﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗﻰ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜــﺎﻝ ،ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﺱ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ .ﻃﻰ ﺳــﻪ ﺩﻫﺔ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ »ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳــﻰ« ﻭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﻴﺮ ،ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ؛ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺗﺒﻌﺔ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻧــﺎﺩﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﺩﺭﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ! ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ »ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ« ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻧﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺳﻤﺎً »ﺳﻮﮔﻨﺪ« ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺠــﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴــﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻘﺎء ﺗﺎﺝ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺖ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ »ﻏﺮﺏ« ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘــﻼﺱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻯ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺭﺩﻳﻒ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ! ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ »ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ« ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ »ﻣﻮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺸــﺪ« ﺟﺮﺃﺕ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺯﺩ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺷــﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﻧــﺎﺩﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺑﮕــﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻼﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺳــﻮﺍﺋﻰ ،ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ؛ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً »ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ« ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻣﻨﺴــﺘﺎﻥ، ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﻳﺠــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺟﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﺪﻭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺣﺪﻓﺎﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻯ ﺳــﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻯ ﺧــﺰﺭ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ »ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ« ﺑــﺮ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﺓ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺧﺘﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻥﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ. ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺷــﺘﺎﺑﺰﺩﺓ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻣﻨﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻗﺘﻞﻋﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻟﻮﺩﮔﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺘﻞﻋﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ
ﺑﺪﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺭﺩﻩ، ﺷﺎﻳﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺼﺪﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﺓ ﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺯﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺔ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﺑﺎ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ،ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻡ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ :ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﻳﺠﺎﻥ ،ﮔﺮﺟﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻣﻨﺴﺘﺎﻥ.
ﺟﺎﻟــﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ،ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺤﺘــﺮﻡ ﭘﻠﻴــﺲ ،ﺩﺭ »ﺑﻴﺎﻧــﺎﺕ« ﮔﻬﺮﺑﺎﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻴﺮ ﺳﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ! ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ »ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ« ﻣﺒﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻢ »ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺍﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ« ﺍﻫﺮﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺔ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ »ﮔﺸــﺖ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓــﻰ« ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺴــﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺬﺍ »ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ« ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ »ﺣﺮﺍﻡ« ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ!
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤــﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺸــﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟــﻰ ﭼــﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻠــﻮﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﺸــﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻻً ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻣﻨﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻰﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳــﻰ! ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﺎﻧﮕﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﺔ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ »ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻦ« ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ »ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ« ﺁﺑﻜﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺣﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺓ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭼﺸﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ، ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻠﻰ« ﻓﻰﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻛﻤﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻘﺎء ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻻﻯ ﺯﺧﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻘﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻳﻨــﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒــﺎﻥ ،ﺧﻂﺍﻣﺎﻡ، ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺩﻳﻦﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1357ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴــﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻣﻘــﺪﻡ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳــﻰ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 9ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ:
ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻰ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺐ »ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫــﻰ« ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﺎﺯﺩ، ﺑﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴــﻴﻞ« ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺗــﻰ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ،ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ »ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﺪﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
»ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧــﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫــﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺴﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ«.