19ﻣـــﻪ 2011
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴــﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧــﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ. ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺭﺳــﻤﺎً ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮﮔﻴﺮﻯ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ« ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ »ﺷﺘﺮﺍﻭﺱ
ـ ﻛﻦ« ،ﻣﻬﺮﺓ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ »ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ـ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺪﻙ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﻴﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻒ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺔ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﻮﻑﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ. ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ،ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ »ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ« ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤــﺪ ،ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗــﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻋــﺮﺏ ،ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ! ﺍﻳﻨﻬﻤﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺋﻰ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ« ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ، ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ. ﺍﮔــﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴــﻢ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺗﻨﮕﻨﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﻫﻴــﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﻃﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻭ ﺷــﻠﺘﺎﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍﻯ »ﻣﺤﻔﻠــﻰ« ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻧــﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑــﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ »ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘــﻰ« ـ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻼﻳــﺎﻥ »ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓــﻰ« ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ـ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻔﻜــﺮﺍﻥﺍﺵ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺘﻰ ﻣﺤــﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﺔ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺩﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﺭﺑﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻭﻻﻳﺖﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻀﺤﻜﻪﻫﺎﺋــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧــﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺋﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ »ﺑﺰﺍﻳــﺪ«! ﻛﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺴــﺎﻡ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ« ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﮕــﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴــﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺳــﻮﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳــﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺖﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ »ﻣﻠﻰ ـ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰﻫﺎ«.
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺷﻖ »ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ« ـ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺖﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ـ ﺑﻦﺑﺴــﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ، ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺸــﺘﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ، »ﻣﻠﻰ ـ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰﻫﺎ« ﻭ »ﺳﺒﺰﻫﺎ« ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻫــﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤــﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ. ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ »ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ« ،ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺵﺑﺎﻭﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﻳــﺞ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺘﺎ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً »ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ« ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺁﻳﺪ؛ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ!« ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ؟!« ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ »ﺷــﻘﺎﻕ« ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫــﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﻩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺷــﻘﺎﻕ« ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ. ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﺔ ﻟﻌﻨﺘﻰﺍﺵ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻻً ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ »ﺩﻳﻦ« ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺟﺰ ﻋﻮﺍﻡﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ »ﻛﻨﺎﺭ« ﺁﻳﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﻁ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻛﻪ »ﻛﻨﺎﺭ« ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ »ﻛﻨﺎﺭ« ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﻢﺳــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢﭘﺎﻳــﻪ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔــﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﺷــﺮﻁﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻠﺔ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺳــﺮﻳﻌﺎً ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴــﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺪﺳــﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً »ﺍﺧﺮﻭﻯﺍﻯ« ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻋﻠﻨﻰﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺗﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ» :ﺩﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﺰ«» ،ﺩﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ«» ،ﺟﻦﮔﻴﺮﻯ«، ﻓﻘﻴﻪﺩﻭﺳــﺘﻰ ﻭ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ« ،ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ...ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻭ ﻗﺸﺮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ »ﺩﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ« ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻴﻜﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﺔ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺑﺸﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ، ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﻚﭘﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ .ﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ،ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯ ﺑــﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣــﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﺪﺓ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﺓ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ؛ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﭘﻮچﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ« ﻣﻔﺘﻀﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻀﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ »ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻑﻧﻤﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎ« ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺍﺻــﻞ ﻛﻠﻰ »ﺗﻌﺒﺪ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ .ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ »ﺗﻌﺒﺪ« ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻓــﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ،ﻫﺮ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﻠﻖﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ» ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ« ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﺒﺚ ،ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ! ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﺒﺪ
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ »ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ« ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﺗﻔﻜﺮ« ﻧﻴــﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤــﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻰ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ. ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ 1967ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ، ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 29ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖﻣﺎﻩ ،1390ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ: »ﺁﻗــﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﻔــﺖ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1967ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺩ«. ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ »ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ« ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،1967ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ »ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ« ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ »ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ـ ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﻗــﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ؛ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫﻮ، ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓﺍﻓﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫــﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻨﮕﺮ »ﺻﻠﺢﻃﻠﺒــﻰ« ﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺑــﺮﺩﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺗﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓﺍﻓﺮﻭﺯﺍﻧﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ »ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ« ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ.
ﻃﺒﻴﻌــﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤــﺮﻭﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﺍﺑــﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻔﺮﻳﺒــﻰ ﻭ »ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉﺳــﺎﺯﻯ« ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﻓﺘــﺢ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑــﻮﺩﻯ ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ »ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺯﺩﻩ« ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣــﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺒﺎﺣﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﺭﻣﻖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺩﺑﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﻪ ﻛﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﺎﻥ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺷﺶ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯ »ﻏﺎﻳﺐ« ﻭ ﻏﺎﻳﺐﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﺮﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﻭ ﻟﻜﻨﺖﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻓﺘﺪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠــﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻪ ﺩﻫﺔ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛــﻢ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ .ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀــﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳــﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﺋﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺤﻘﻘﻴﻦ« ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺰﺍﺋﻰ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ. ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ »ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ« ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﺑﻰﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺎﻗــﻰ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ :ﺑﻪ ﭼــﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻦﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺳﻜﺘﺎﺭﻳﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 29ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ، ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑــﺎﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣــﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
»ﺁﻗــﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺣــﻖ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ِ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻤﻌﺎﺕ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ«. ﭼــﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ! ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺴﺘﺎﺧﻰ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ، ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤــﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺠــﺐ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻤــﺔ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗــﺎﻯ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ »ﻳﺪﺍﻟﻬﻰ« ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺿﺪﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ،ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ! ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﺸــﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ، ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻤﺠﻴﺪ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ. ﺧﻼﺻــﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺗﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴــﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻻﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ »ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ ـ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ« ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﺍﻧــﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳــﻚ ﻓــﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠــﻮ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﺋﻰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭽﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ، ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻃﺮﻓــﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻻﺋﻴــﻚ ،ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳــﻴﺎﻝ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺕﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺧــﻮﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧــﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ »ﺳﻮﺍﺩ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ« ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸــﻜﺎﻓﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ »ﺧﺰﻋﺒﻼﺕ« ﻛــﻪ ﺗﺤــﺖ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ »ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ« ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ »ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ« ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ »ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ« ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ »ﻣﺤﻘﻘﻴﻦ« ﻓﺎﺭﻳﻦﭘﺎﻟﻴﺴﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎپ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﻣــﻰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ »ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰﺍﻯ« ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴــﻢ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴــﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺁﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ،ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃــﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑــﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺳﻮﺧﺘﺔ »ﺿﺪﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸــﺖ ﻣﻰﻓﺸــﺎﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺿﺪﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭ« ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻠــﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ »ﭘﻨﻬــﺎﻥ« ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻔﺎﻯ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ »ﻣﺘﺮﻗﻰ« ﻭ »ﺳﺒﺰ« ﻭ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺗــﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﻭ ...ﺳــﻨﮕﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﻂ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.