Skip to main content

R+E - 227W20 evict FINAL

Page 1

ROSENBERG & ESTIS, P.C. 733 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10017 PRESS CONTACT: Shea Communications, LLC, Linda O’Flanagan, George Shea (332) 456-5459 linda@sheacommunications.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

ROSENBERG & ESTIS, P.C. SUCCESSFULLY WINS REMOVAL OF FORMER SUPER USING DOCTOR’S OFFICE AS HIS HOME Attorneys employ legal strategy that secures use & occupancy, possession judgement

NEW YORK, September 4, 2025 – Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., one of New York City’s preeminent real estate law firms, announced it successfully secured a property owner’s right to regain possession of a commercial unit in New York’s Chelsea neighborhood where a former building superintendent was squatting after being fired from his job. Representing the owner of a mixed-use multi-family walkup building in Chelsea, Member Alex Estis and Counsel Ariel S. Bresky obtained a court order enforcing the eviction and securing a rare monetary judgment for retroactive use and occupancy of the basement property. “This was a clear case of unlawful occupancy, but the legal complexities required a creative and strategic approach,” said Estis. “We not only obtained a judgment for fair market use and occupancy, but we also secured a court order enjoining further residential use and ultimately authorizing eviction.” The 1,100-square-foot space, designated solely for commercial use and previously used as a doctor’s office, had been unlawfully occupied by the former building employee after he was dismissed in October 2024. The former super never held legal tenancy rights and violated both the building’s COO and multiple housing codes by using the space as a residential apartment. Leveraging provisions of the Multiple Dwelling Law and Administrative Code, the attorneys highlighted the hazardous nature of the illegal occupancy, which jeopardized the building’s insurance and violated safety standards. Their innovative legal strategy enabled them to leverage the building’s commercial Certificate of Occupancy to prove the tenant’s residential use was unlawful, allowing the landlord to collect use and occupancy and seek removal. Judge Gerald Lebovits denied the former super’s claims for tenant protections under residential housing laws which normally make use and occupancy fees hard to secure. Noting that Rosenberg & Estis had proven that the space is not legally residential and that residential tenant


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
R+E - 227W20 evict FINAL by Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. - Issuu