THE
ROAD SAFETY TRUST
Impact Report
Making Roads Safer
2016-2021
5
25 PROJECTS
YEARS
1
Grant-giving basics
£3.9m
AWARDED TO A TOTAL OF
56
PROJECTS BY MAY 2021
1
CLOSED BUT UNCOMPLETED PROJECT (£137,969)
30
ONGOING LIVE PROJECTS (£2,200,883)
25
PROJECTS COMPLETED (£ 1,571,074)
2
NUMBER OF GRANTS AWARDED BY ROAD USER
25
ALL ROAD USERS
8
DRIVERS MOTORCYCLISTS
2 7
PEDAL CYCLISTS
9
PEDESTRIANS
5
OTHER
NUMBER OF GRANTS AWARDED BY ORGANISATION TYPE CHARITY (17) LOCAL AUTHORITY (10) OTHER PUBLIC SECTOR (6) POLICE FORCE (1) UNIVERSITY (18) COMPANY (4)
Grants by Geographical Area
GRANTS BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA
ALL UK (18) ENGLAND (29) ENGLAND AND WALES (5) NORTHERN IRELAND (1) SCOTLAND (1) WALES (5)
NUMBER OF TRUSTEES (MAY 2021): 13 FTE ROAD SAFETY TRUST STAFF: 2.75
The Road Safety Trust is a company limited by guarantee registered in England & Wales number 08837451 and a registered charity number 1156300. It operates a wholly owned trading subsidiary company, UKROEd Ltd, which runs the National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme (NDORS) on behalf of UK participating police forces.
Contents Welcome (1) How UKROEd is making a difference (5) Impact Assessment: Approach and Process (9) Impact Assessment Results (13) Individual Completed Projects (17) Grants Team (38)
5
Welcome SALLY LINES OBE MSC, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, THE ROAD SAFETY TRUST
1
Welcome to The Road Safety Trust’s first Impact Report. We are pleased to be able to celebrate 5 years of grant-giving and our first 25 completed projects by articulating the impact made to UK road safety through our funding – a milestone indeed.
As a new grant-giving charity, these first 5 years have been formative ones, allowing for the development from scratch of our approach and systems. The period has given us the opportunity to learn about how best to attract high quality applications, assess and award the grants, manage, and support each project as a partner and capture the progress and difference made. As a grantgiving Trust, we are entirely dependent on projects meeting their objectives for us to meet ours of ‘making UK roads safer’, hence the clear need for partnership and collaboration throughout the project’s lifetime. Trustees also accept that there are risks with funding research, pilots and trials and innovation, i.e., it may not always turn out the way we would like; that is the nature of experimentation. Whilst we have worked with grantees over the years to record their outputs (e.g., reports, websites, videos etc.), it has proved harder to capture their outcomes e.g., better informed young drivers, or motorcyclists with improved awareness. We feel that we have got better at working with grantees to plan for and monitor outcomes of their projects over the 5 years and systems are now in place for making the collection of such information easier and quicker for the 30 ongoing projects and new projects awarded this year onwards.
2
Yet none of the above really helped the Trust to be able to articulate the difference that it has made to road safety in the UK with its funding, and that has been the true challenge. Due to the nature of projects funded, it is not as simple as measuring reduction in deaths or serious injuries. Every charity has the challenge of proving its impact which is made easier or more difficult depending on its purpose, who its beneficiaries are or whether it delivers frontline as opposed to being an ‘enabler’ like the Trust, which awards the grants to projects whose objective it is to make that difference. In 2020, while the whole of the UK was in the grip of Covid-19 and its restrictions, we tackled this ‘charity challenge’ of assessing our impact head-on and the outcome of that work is in this report. For clarity, the assessment of our impact relates to the 25 completed projects, not to the total 56 funded (1 of which terminated before completion, 30 of which are ongoing). As projects complete, they will be categorised and added to the total figures which will be reported against annually from hereon in. We also aim to improve how we capture project outcomes, the difference made by them and lessons learned, as our process of assessing our impact develops
3
over time. All projects have varying degrees of impact and the aim of this assessment is not to try and judge those so much as categorise where a project might have made a difference or has the potential to make a difference. Projects rarely have impact immediately on completion, so a medium to long-term approach is needed and this assessment is just the start. Covid-19 has resulted in delays for many of the projects that the Trust has awarded grant funding to. If projects get back on track with easing of restrictions during 2021, then there will be 17 more projects completing during 2021-22, 8 of which were scheduled to complete last year. As more projects get awarded each year, their impact will get captured in the framework introduced here and added to the numbers below.
The 25 completed projects have either contributed to, or have the potential to contribute to, the following main areas:
14
Safer People
5
Improved Road Safety Management
While the Trust makes its difference to road safety through grant-giving, its wholly owned trading subsidiary, UKROEd Ltd, contributes to its charity’s purpose through the education of road offenders. All the Trust’s charitable income is donated by UKROEd and comprises any surplus made through the operation of the National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme (NDORS) which it carries out on behalf of participating UK Police Forces. The Trust could not do what it does without UKROEd and its delivery partners. While the activities are different, our Vision is shared:
3
Safer Vehicles
2
Safer Speeds
Zero deaths and serious injuries on UK roads
1
Safer Roads
4
How UKROEd is making a difference RUTH PURDIE OBE, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, UKROED LTD
5
I am delighted to contribute to this first Impact Report of our parent charity, The Road Safety Trust. UKROEd has its own Board of Directors with responsibility for the governance and development of the NDOR Scheme on behalf of the UK Police Service and it shares the same vision as the Trust. Through its actions, UKROEd drives behavioural change outcomes that result in safer roads. The focus on preventing re-offending is a key element of our approach. Some facts and figures are opposite:
11 UKROEd currently provides 11 courses that address change of driver behaviour around speed, safety, seatbelts, cycling, vulnerable road users, motorway driving and offences committed on motorcycles.
11.1m 11.1m such courses have been delivered since 2014, with 82% focused on change of behaviour around speed.
1.31m During 2020-21, 1.31m courses were delivered. These were delivered virtually, due to Covid-19 restrictions.
40,000 Of 40,000 survey respondents who attended and completed an NDORS course during 2020-21: • 89% stated they will be more safety conscious for themselves and other road users as a result of the course; and • 87% said they will consider the impact of their driving upon other road users. 6
Results of an impact evaluation on the National Speed Awareness Course (NSAC) published in May 20181 indicated that participation in this course was more effective at reducing speed reoffending than a Fixed Penalty Notice (comprising a fine and penalty points) over a period of 3 years following the initial offer to attend. An overview of the findings is set out in the following table. The findings also suggested that the effects of the course were greater among those drivers who had held a licence for a longer period of time.
Time elapsed since the offer to participate in NSAC
Estimated reduction in the rate of reoffending2 as result of participating in NSAC
Estimated reduction in the number of reoffences as a result of participating in NSAC
6 months
12-23%
13-23%
1 year
9-17%
11-17%
2 years
9-11%
9-12%
3 years
6-13%
6-18%
1 Ipsos Mori (in association with George Barrett) and the Institute for Transport Studies the University of Leeds were commissioned by the Department for Transport to undertake an assessment of the effects of the National Speed Awareness Course (NSAC) on the subsequent speed reoffending of participants. The full Impact Evaluation can be found here: Impact evaluation of the National Speed Awareness Course (publishing.service.gov.uk) 2 These reductions should be interpreted as the percentage reduction in the reoffending rate for course participants compared to the comparison group e.g., the reoffending rate for course participants after 3 years is 21%, a 10% reduction would imply that this reoffending rate would otherwise have been 23.3%.
7
Participation in [the NSAC] course was more effective at reducing speed reoffending than a Fixed Penalty Notice
8
Impact Assessment Approach and Process
9
The steps outlined here summarise how we got from individual project data to an impact assessment framework suitable for collective reporting:
STEP 1 The Grants Team pulled together all the individual project outputs and outcomes information for review in one document. Completed projects were contacted for outcomes and impact updates for inclusion.
IMPACT
STEP 2 We produced our Theory of Change for the Trust
• Safer Speeds • Safer Roads • Safer Vehicles • Safer People • Improved Post-Crash Response • Improved Road Safety Management
VISION
Zero deaths and serious injuries on UK roads
PURPOSE
To make UK roads safer, achieving impact through the funding of practical measures, research, dissemination, and education
PROJECT OUTPUTS
• Better road safety knowledge & behaviour • Better organisational risk management • Better organisational policies & procedures • Better guidance • Better safety equipment design standards • Better compliance • Better road safety legislation
PROJECT OUTCOMES
• Reports • Evidence • Conferences/events • Resources e.g. toolkits, compendium, podcast, video, training material, website • Standards • Practical interventions
• Research & Development • Partnerships • Communication • Monitoring & Evaluation • Leadership • Standards & legislation • Enforcement • Innovation
RST INPUTS
Partnership Rigour Independence Passion Knowledge & Challenge
CHANGE MECHANISMS
Funds
10
STEP 3
Agilysis was approached to help us compose a framework that was appropriate for the types of projects we fund, the Trust and the road safety sector
“To create a framework to determine impact, the starting point was the Trust’s vision: “To have the safest roads in the world with zero road deaths and serious injuries.” This is the ethical imperative at the centre of the Safe System model, making the Safe System the perfect approach for articulating the impact of funded projects. Many countries and organisations have adopted the Safe System model, with the core elements in the centre, surrounded by the various actions these territories believe contribute to the creation of a Safe System. Working with the Trust team, we grouped these actions into eight headings of ‘change mechanisms’; these are the mechanisms that funded projects will use to effect change in the UK road safety system. We also decided to design an adapted Safe System specifically for the Trust, adding in ‘Road Safety Management’ as an element. The new model provides the Trust with a framework to categorise projects and to understand how each project will have an impact on the system. This, in turn, helps the Trust understand the impact it has in achieving its charitable purpose. The framework also highlights the areas where more work is needed and therefore where future rounds of grants might need to focus.”
STEP 4 TANYA FOSDICK
11
The main approaches used by projects and common to most to achieve their objectives were categorised and classed as ‘change mechanisms’
The RST Safe System framework was drafted and agreed by Trustees as an appropriate impact assessment model
STEP 5
Monitoring & Evaluation
Leadership
Safer Vehicles
Improved Road Safety Management
Improved Post-Crash Response Innovation
Partnership
To have zero deaths and serious injuries on UK roads Safer People
Safer Roads
Communication
Enforcement
Safer Speeds
Research & Development
Standards & Legislation
STEP 6 We categorised projects into the Safe System framework. This was harder than it looks, due to the overlap of projects between pillars e.g., a project which clearly contributes to ‘Safer People’ may also include a component of ‘Safer Roads’. 12
Impact Assessment Results
13
The process of assessing our impact has been an interesting and challenging exercise, which will continue and develop as we award more projects and as those projects complete.
As a result of the work carried out and explained in this first impact report, The Road Safety Trust is able to demonstrate that it has made a difference to UK road safety through its grant award of £1,571,074 to the first 25 completed projects either contributing to, or having the potential to contribute to, the following:
Safer People
14
Safer Vehicles
Safer Speeds
3
2 Safer Roads
Improved Road Safety Management
1
5 Improved Post-Crash Response
0
Grant award of £1,571,074 to the first 25 completed projects 14
e
Some highlighted examples of IMPACT (full details on the individual project pages 17-37)
IMPROVED ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT Safer Vehicles report (PACTS Project ‘Seizing The Opportunities’ on p31) was credited as evidence for the Government’s updated car buying standards which mandates 5-star cars from 31 Dec 2020 for central government departments and agencies.
SAFER SPEEDS A community-led intervention to improve residential road safety was developed and trialled (see ‘Community Corners’ project on p35). The intervention used light touch engineering measures such as street furniture and road markings. A statistically significant decrease was observed in speed and traffic volume on experimental streets. A positive trend could also be observed in residents’ perception of safety and environmental parameters on experimental streets.
15
SAFER PEOPLE A research report produced by Nottingham Trent University (see project p18) suggests that a mindfulness training intervention can produce safety-related improvements in driving in laboratory and on-road measures. These include positive effects on driving-related anger, speed variance, hazard perception and mind wandering.
16
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… ALL ROAD USERS
Promoting safety for vulnerable road users: assessing the investigation and enforcement of endangerment offences University of Leicester | £45,138 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report examining current practice around the enforcement of endangerment offences – dangerous driving, careless driving and using a mobile phone whilst driving. A video, podcast, journal publication and article in ‘Magistrate’.
1
The report contains a set of recommendations for policy and practice and has been disseminated widely. Feedback from police forces has indicated some adoption of good practice identified through the report. The report was submitted as evidence as part of the House of Commons Transport Committee inquiry into road safety and active travel and contributed to the case for clarifying the law around driving and mobile phone use. An article was published in ‘Learning the Lessons’ produced by the Independent Office for Police Conduct’.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
17
Enforcement
Standards & Legislation
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… DRIVERS
Assessing the potential of driver awareness and emotional regulation training in improving road safety Nottingham Trent University | £98,604 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report and series of 8 short video versions of the mindfulness lectures.
2
The report suggests that a mindfulness-training intervention can produce safety-related improvements in driving in laboratory and on-road measures. These include positive effects on driving-related anger, speed variance, hazard perception and mind wandering.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Communication
Monitoring & Evaluation
Innovation
18
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… PEDAL CYCLISTS Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…BUS PASSENGERS
Research into the safety of London bus passengers
New Cycle Helmet Assessment Programme (NCHAP): protocols development
4 3 Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) | £99,520
London TravelWatch and Loughborough University £36,500 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report and two stakeholder workshops.
The project report identified key areas that can be addressed to help reduce bus passenger injuries in the short term through changing driver and bus passenger behaviour, supported by policy change, longer term technology and bus design measures.
RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report on testing for rotational impacts to better understand cycle head injuries. An international workshop comparing research across different laboratories.
London TravelWatch will use the findings of the research to inform its ongoing work to improve services to bus passengers.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
19
Standards & Legislation
CHANGE MECHANISMS
Innovation
Research & Development
Standards & Legislation
Partnership
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… DRIVERS
Development and pilot of a business travelfocused intervention addressing closefollowing driving behaviour Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) | £98,215
5
RST PRIORITY: PILOTS THAT TEST
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made The project produced a report and a literature review. These outputs contribute to understanding about the risk factors for close following driving behaviours and suggest ways for how they can be addressed.
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…MOBILITY SCOOTER USERS
Mobility scooter user behaviour and hazard perception at road crossings Nottingham Trent University | £88,976 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS
Project reports submitted to academic journals.
Evaluation of the guide suggests those who view it are then better able to negotiate hazards.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Monitoring & Evaluation
6
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A video guide ‘See and Scoot’ available online through the NTU hosted ‘Test my Driving’ web-site: https://www.testmydriving.com/see-scoot and through TGA Mobility: https://www.tgamobility.co.uk/about-us/videos/ watch?v=09-WfD6sQIU.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Communication
Monitoring & Evaluation
20
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… YOUNG PEOPLE
Impulse control and road safety - an educational intervention Extern NI | £100,000 RST PRIORITY: PILOTS THAT TEST Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A classroom-based educational intervention for 15-24-year-olds, aimed at improving impulsive behaviour. Positive results were indicated in the areas of awareness of road safety and around issues of impulsiveness. A follow-on grant has been awarded to eDriving solutions under the 2019-20 Small Grants Programme and Impact Fund to further develop, trial and evaluate the intervention
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
21
Monitoring & Evaluation
Innovation
Partnership
7
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… ALL ROAD USERS
Innovators and innovations in preventing mobile phone use while driving: sharing and improving University of Keele | £75,096 + £9,451 Impact Fund RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Compendium for the road safety profession reviewing innovations aimed at discouraging mobile phone use while driving.
8
The Compendium was launched in March 2019 and updated in 2020; Keele will track dissemination and what happens as a result. An additional outcome of the project was the creation of a ‘Roads Policing Academic Network’ (RPAN) and a suite of resources to support NPCC’s 2020 Mobile Enforcement Campaign.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Communication
Monitoring & Evaluation
Partnership
22
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR … ALL ROAD USERS
Green light safety app (Drive VR) West Mercia Police | £35,000 + £2,250 Impact Fund RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… YOUNG PEOPLE
9 10
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/drive-vr/ id1180969769?mt=8
Drive VR aims to improve young people’s road safety by helping them to understand the consequences of poor decisions and providing ways of managing peer pressure.
The young people driving change fix Fixers | £70,000
RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A dedicated ‘Micro-site’ for young people: http://www. fixers.org.uk/feel-happy-fix/the-road-safety-fix/home. php The project highlighted the value of peer-to-peer education for young people and the project outputs have had a large reach
CHANGE MECHANISMS Innovation
Communication
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
23
Communication
Partnerships
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…ALL ROAD USERS
Road safety mobility scooter training
11 12 MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… PEDESTRIANS
Urban Vision | £2,600
RST PRIORITY: PILOTS THAT TEST
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Training and advice event in Salford. Better informed mobility scooter users (attendees of the event).
CHANGE MECHANISMS Communication
Developing a road crossing educational computer ‘game’ for primary schools Cardiff University | £67,468
RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Carried out research adding to understanding of how children learn about crossing the road (teaching scanning skills, using a child’s point of view and touch) and devised a downloadable road safety game for use at schools and at home. The game which is for 7–9-year-olds (Virtual Road World) is available via the Apple Store.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Innovation
24
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…MOTORCYCLISTS
Know the dangers! Shiny Side Up Partnership | £13,000 + £2,286 Impact Fund RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
13
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A suite of video resources (7 short ones and 1 combined video) and infographics updated from paper format for motorcycle safety. https://shinysideup.co.uk/know-the-dangers/
The 8 films have already been viewed 273,866 times. The resource influences training practice by including ‘filtering’ as a manoeuvre.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Partnership
25
Innovation
Communication
Safer People
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… CHILD PEDESTRIANS
14
Identifying and evaluating promising road safety education programmes for parents of children under eleven years. University College London | £105,592 RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A practitioners’ resource ‘Guide to Involving Parents in Children’s Road Safety Education’.
The project provides a valuable evidence-based resource that can be used by practitioners to involve parents in teaching their children road safety. Findings from the research have been presented nationally and internationally.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Communication
Standards & Legislation
Research & Development
Monitoring & Evaluation
26
Improved Road Safetye Management
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… ALL ROAD USERS
The management of occupational road risk: emerging issues for policy and practice in a changing economy A survey of grey fleet and gig economy drivers, riders and their managers University College London | £24,293
15
RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A research report on road risk and its management in the ‘gig economy’.
A number of policy and practice leads are being followed up, these include the recommendation for there to be a parliamentary inquiry into road safety and the ‘gig economy’. The report has been circulated to key stakeholders and was presented at a PACTS conference on Work Related Road Safety. We continue to look at ways for the recommendations to be taken forward.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
27
Communication
Standards & Legislation
Improved Road Safety Management
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… ALL ROAD USERS
Strengthening the evidence base for effective pursuit management and decision-making for police officers and staff managing public safety and policing of the roads
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime and UCL | £27,724 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report providing comparative analysis of Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and national pursuit data (2016-2019). 30 in-depth qualitative interviews among drivers, control staff, tactical advisors and strategic stakeholders to explore factors which generate pursuits and influence their subsequent safety. A peer review article in ‘Safety Science’.
16
Enforcement
Standards & Legislation
The report has been used by the MPS Strategic Pursuit Group and National Pursuit Group to analyse the reasons for pursuits and how they are resourced and conducted. It has contributed to updates to working practices, including an increased emphasis on pre-emptive tactics as well as informing training and guidance for officers. Feedback from the MPS is that the project helped to improve the decision-making skills of control staff and drivers involved in pursuits and enhanced communications between control room staff and pursuit drivers.
28
Improved Road Safetye Management
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… DRIVERS
Reducing suicides on the UK roads - providing a baseline
17
PACTS (Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety) £15,500 + £7,300 of Impact Fund RST PRIORITY:ADVOCACY THAT INFLUENCES Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report and journal article.
Raised awareness of roads-related suicide and influenced changes to recording, reporting and management.
CHANGE MECHANISMS
29
Research & Development
Communication
Partnership
Leadership
Improved Road Safety Management
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… ALL ROAD USERS
Current and future road safety education, training and provision (RSE) across the 33 London local authorities London Road Safety Council £25,000 RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
18
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A qualitative report and a course on evaluation supporting the use of RoSPA’s E-Valu-it toolkit.
The project highlighted issues such as the lack of evaluation of existing interventions and difficulties using casualty data, providing an opportunity for London Road Safety Officers to raise and discuss concerns.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Standards & Legislation
Partnership
Leadership
30
Improved Road Safetye Management
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… ALL ROAD USERS
Seizing the opportunities
19
PACTS (Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety) | £19,000 RST PRIORITY:ADVOCACY THAT INFLUENCES
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Three policy reports (‘Safer Vehicles’, ‘Safer Roads’ and ‘Safer Road Users’) and a conference.
The ‘Safer Vehicles’ report was credited as evidence for the Government’s updated car buying standards which mandates 5-star cars from 31 Dec 2020 for central government departments and agencies. The reports have also been used by PACTS as follows: response to Ministerial Statement on Road Safety, support for revisions to EU Vehicle Safety Regulations, recommendation for the prioritisation of Vulnerable Road Users and need for a Road Safety Performance Management Framework at the national and local level.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Partnership
31
Standards & Legislation
Leadership
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR… OLDER PEOPLE
Safer Vehicles
FLOURISH - design requirements to enable use of connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) by older people with a disability Designability | £61,678 + £1,500 Impact Fund
20
RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Best practice guidance for HMI developers, user interface designers, CAV manufacturers and the auto industry (based on research on older peoples’ needs but also more widely applicable).
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Standards & Legislation
Monitoring & Evaluation
Innovation
32
e Safer Vehicles
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…PEDESTRIANS
Reducing road traffic casualties through improved forensic techniques and vehicle design (RoaD) – proof of concept Coventry University | £37,412 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A project report, a plain English summary and a journal article. A new organ trauma model for road traffic collisions.
21
The new organ trauma model has been included in the Toyota Motor Corporation ‘Total Human Model for Safety’ (THUMS) software. THUMS is a virtual human body model software program for computer analysis of human body injuries caused in vehicle collisions.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Partnership
33
Standards & Legislation
Safer Vehicles
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…DRIVERS
Using cognitive responses to assess and improve vehicle brake light designs University of Kent | £151,533 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS / PILOTS THAT TEST Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Academic outputs – Literature Review, laboratory and real-world testing methods and equipment, journal article. Project website to support dissemination and engagement. https://brake-light.uk/
22
The laboratory tests indicated better perception and braking times for LED lights than bulb-based lights and some further differences between models. This needs to be validated in a real world setting in order to generate reliable and actionable new knowledge for manufacturers. The RST plans to issue a call to complete the research.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Standards & Legislation
34
Safer Speeds e
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…ALL ROAD USERS
Community Corners CHANGE MECHANISMS Transport Research Laboratory £97,500 + £1,000 Impact Fund
23
Research & Development
Monitoring & Evaluation
Standards & Legislation
Innovation
RST PRIORITY: PILOTS THAT TEST
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report and a ‘Practitioners’ Guide’ to enable other road safety professionals to deliver the intervention.
Trialled and tested an intervention using light touch engineering measures such as street furniture and road markings. A statistically significant decrease was observed in speed and traffic volume on experimental streets. A positive trend could be observed in residents’ perception of safety and environmental parameters on experimental streets.
35
Safer Speeds
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…PEDAL CYCLISTS
The impacts of centre line removal or nonreinstatement on 20mph and 30mph speed limit roads as a contribution to cycle user safety UWE | £27,122
24
RST PRIORITY: DISSEMINATION THAT REACHES
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made A report and guidance note for the road safety profession.
The project carried out an evidence review, surveyed local authorities for local studies and produced a report and a guidance note for practitioners. Local studies suggest speed reductions of 1–2 mph for Centre Line Removal, however the report concluded there is a lack of robust studies.
CHANGE MECHANISMS Research & Development
Monitoring & Evaluation
Standards & Legislation
36
Safer Roads
MAKING ROADS SAFER FOR…PEDAL CYCLISTS
Reducing cycling injuries while cycling grows: a study of key route environment factors associated with reduced or elevated injury risk in the UK University of Westminster | £128,994 RST PRIORITY: RESEARCH THAT INFORMS / ADVOCACY THAT INFLUENCES
37
25
CHANGE MECHANISMS
Outputs, Outcomes & Difference Made Three journal articles. The case studies presented as twelve short topicfocused film chapters: https://vimeo.com/channels/1696720/videos
Research & Development
Evidence-based policy recommendations for cycle infrastructure presented in an accessible format e.g. • Mini roundabouts, like conventional roundabouts, may increase risk to cyclists. • High streets (with clusters of retail and related activity) are riskier for people cycling. • Shared bus lanes should not be considered as safe cycle infrastructure. • Sites with painted (usually ‘advisory’) cycle lanes are riskier for people cycling than sites without.
Standards & Legislation
Meet the Team I would like to acknowledge our Grants Team in the production of this first Impact Report for the Trust. It is a very small team with only 1.5 FTE staff across 3 people. The team manages the entire grant planning, application, award, monitoring and management process on a day-to-day basis. Strategic oversight is provided by the Road Safety Initiatives Committee which is comprised currently of 6 Trustee members with delegated responsibility by the full Board of Trustees. This work on assessing our impact as a charity would not have been possible without the level of knowledge and familiarity with each individual project that the Grants Team has. My thanks go to Louise, Tanya and Victoria for carrying out this vital work in addition to management of our grantee projects in a year of uncertainty like no other. By Sally Lines OBE MSc Chief Executive
LOUISE PALOMINO Grants Director Louise joined the charity in 2015 and has led it through its 7 different grant rounds to date. Most of the 42 different organisations which have received grant awards will have liaised with Louise at some point on their journey. “As a Grants Team we are grateful for and inspired by the hard working projects we have funded for the difference they are making to road safety”.
TANYA QADIR Grants Officer Tanya boosted the capacity of the Grants Team by 0.6FTE when she joined to help Louise in 2018 and has made a real difference to the Trust’s ability to properly service our grantees and their projects while we are working with them.
VICTORIA SINCLAIR Admin Officer Victoria joined us in October 2019 working 3.5 days pw, of which the 0.5 is spent supporting Louise and Tanya with grants work. Anyone who emails our info@roadsafetytrust.org.uk address will get a reply from Victoria... 38
The Road Safety Trust Registered charity number 1156300 Company registered in England & Wales number 08837451 Registered Office: Colwyn Chambers, York Street, Manchester, M2 3BA www.roadsafetytrust.org.uk
RoadSafetyTruUK
39