RATED page updated: August 2019
Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., Stringer, I. and Hogue, T. E. (2008) ‘Sexual reconviction rates in the United Kingdom and actuarial risk estimates.’ Child Abuse & Neglect 32(1), 121 138. Access Grubin,Here
Langton, C. M., Hogue, T. E., Daffern, M., Mannion, A. and Howells, K. (2009) ‘Prediction of institutional aggression among personality disordered forensic patients using actuarial and structured clinical risk assessment tools: prospective evaluation of the HCR 20, VRS, Static 99, and Risk Matrix 2000.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 15(7), 635 659. Access Here
Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H. C. and Howard, P. D. (2010) ‘An Examination of the Predictive Validity of the Risk Matrix 2000 in England and Wales.’ Sexual Abuse 22(4), 443 470. Access Here.
Bengtson, S. (2008) ‘Is newer better? A cross validation of the Static 2002 and the Risk Matrix 2000 in a Danish sample of sexual offenders.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 14(2), 85 106. Access Here
Beech, A. R., Fisher, D. D. and Thornton, D. (2003) ‘Risk assessment of sex offenders.’ Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34(4), 339 352. Access Here.
D. (1998) Sexual Offending Against Children: Understanding the Risk. London: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate. Access Here
Kingston, D. A., Yates, P. M., Firestone, P., Babchishin, K. and Bradford, J. M. (2008) ‘Long Term Predictive Validity of the Risk Matrix 2000: A Comparison With the Static 99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.’ Sexual Abuse 20(4), 466 484. Access Here
Knight, R. A. and Thornton, D. (2007) Evaluating and Improving Risk Assessment Schemes for Sexual Recidivism: A Long Term Follow Up of Convicted Sexual Offenders. Washington, D. C.: United States Department of Justice. Access Here.
Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D. and Stringer, l. (2004) ‘Comparing Sex Offender Risk Assessment Measures on a UK Sample.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48(1), 7 27. Access Here.
© Risk Management Authority 2019
Grubin, D. (2011) ‘A Large Scale Evaluation of Risk Matrix 2000 in Scotland.’ Sexual Abuse, 23(4), 419 433. Access Here.
VALIDATED TOOLS
Hanson, R. K. and Thornton, D. (2000) ‘Improving Risk Assessments for Sex Offenders: A Comparison of Three Actuarial Scales.’ Law and Human Behavior 24(1), 119 136. Access Here.
Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M. and Thornton, D. (2015) ‘Sex offender risk assessment with the risk matrix 2000: validations and guidelines for combining with the STABLE 2007.’ Journal of Sexual Aggression 21(2), 136 157. Access Here
Howard, P. and Wakeling, H. (2019) ‘Comparing two predictors of sexual recidivism: the Risk Matrix 2000 and the OASys Sexual Reoffending Predictor [Ministry of Justice Analytical Series]. HMPPS: Unpublished report. [Not accessible]
RM2000
Lehmann, R. J. B., Thornton, D., Helmus, L. M. and Hanson, R. K. (2016) ‘Developing Nonarbitrary Metrics for Risk Communication: Norms for the Risk Matrix 2000.’ Criminal Justice Behavior 43(12), 1661 1687. Access Here
Nicholls, C. M. and Webster, S. (2014) ‘Sex offender management and dynamic risk: pilot evaluation of the Active Risk Management System (ARMS).’ Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. Access Here
© Risk
Wakeling, H. C., Mann, R. E. and Milner, R. J. (2011) ‘Interrater Reliability of Risk Matrix 2000/s.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 55(8), 1324 1337. Access Here
Middleton, D. (2008) ‘From research to practice: the development of the internet sex offender treatment programme (i SOTP).’ Irish Probation Journal 5, 49 64. Access Here.
Smid, W. J., Kamphuis, J. H., Weaver, E. C. and Van Beek, D. J. (2014) ‘A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.’ Psychological Assessment 26(3), 691 703. Access Here
Thornton, D. (2010) Scoring guide for Risk Matrix 2000.10/SVC. London, England: Ministry of Justice. [Not accessible]
Looman, J. and Abracen, J. (2010) ‘Comparison of Measures of Risk for Recidivism in Sexual Offenders.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25(5), 791 807. Access Here.
Parent, G., Guay, J. P. and Knight, R. A. (2011) ‘An assessment of long term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: one size doesn’t fit all.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 38(2), 188 209. Access Here
Lindsay, W. R., Hogue, T. E., Taylor, J. L., Steptoe, L., Mooney, P., O’Brien, G., Johnston, S., Smith, A. H. W. (2008) Risk Assessment in Offenders With Intellectual Disability: A Comparison Across Three Levels of Security.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(1), 90 111. Access Here.
RATED page updated: August 2019 Management Authority 2019
Osborn, J., Elliott, I. A., Middleton, D. and Beech, A. R. (2010) ‘The use of actuarial risk assessment measures with UK internet child pornography offenders. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research 2(3), 16 24. Access Here.
Pryboda, J., Tully, R. J. and Browne, K. D. (2015) ‘Is the Risk Matrix 2000 applicable to intellectually disabled sex offenders?’ Aggression and Violent Behavior 25(A), 184 190. Access Here.
Thornton, D. and Helmus, M. (2015) ‘Adjusting Risk Matrix Categories for Older Age and Time Offense Free.’ ATSA Conference, 16th October. Montreal, Quebec. [Not accessible]
Wakeling, H. C., Howard, P. and Barnett, G. (2011) ‘Comparing the Validity of the RM2000 Scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by internet sexual offenders.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1), 146 168. Access Here
Tully, R. J. and Browne, K. B. (2015) ‘Appraising the Risk Matrix 2000 Static Sex Offender Risk Assessment Tool.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 59(2), 21 224. Access Here.
Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D. and Stringer, l. (2004) ‘Comparing Sex Offender Risk Assessment Measures on a UK Sample.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48(1), 7 27. Access Here.
Långström, N. (2004) ‘Accuracy of Actuarial Procedures for Assessment of Sexual Offender Recidivism Risk May Vary Across Ethnicity.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 16(2), 107 120. Access Here
Blacker, J., Beech, A. R., Wilcox, D. T. and Boer, D. P. (2011) ‘The assessment of dynamic risk and recidivism in a sample of special needs sexual offenders.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 17(1), 75 92. Access Here
Langton, C. M., Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Peacock, E. J., Harkins, L. and Hansen, K. T. (2007) ‘Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders: Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of the Static 2002 and Five Other Instruments.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 34(1), 37 59. Access Here.
Knight, R. A. and Thornton, D. (2007) Evaluating and Improving Risk Assessment Schemes for Sexual Recidivism: A Long Term Follow Up of Convicted Sexual Offenders. Washington, D. C.: United States Department of Justice. Access Here.
Sjöstedt, G. and Långström, N. (2002) ‘Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A Comparison of four different measures.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 8(1), 25 40. Access Here
Hanson, R. K. and Morton Bourgon, K. E. (2009) ‘The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta analysis of 118 prediction studies.’ Psychological Assessment 21(1), 1 21. Access Here
Hanson, R. K. (1997) The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Access Here.
RRASOR Beech, A. R., Fisher, D. D. and Thornton, D. (2003) ‘Risk assessment of sex offenders.’ Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34(4), 339 352. Access Here.
©
Looman, J. and Abracen, J. (2010) ‘Comparison of Measures of Risk for Recidivism in Sexual Offenders.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25(5), 791 807. Access Here
Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A., Boer, D. P. and Eher, R. (2010) ‘Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment: A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 169 186. Access Here
RATED page updated: August 2019 Risk Management Authority 2019
Parent, G., Guay, J. P. and Knight, R. A. (2011) ‘An assessment of long term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: one size doesn’t fit all.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 38(2), 188 209. Access Here.
Webb, L., Craissati, J. and Keen, S. (2007) ‘Characteristics of Internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 19(4), 449 465. Access Here
Watt, K. A. and Jackson, K. (2008) ‘Inter rater and structural reliabilities of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vienna, Austria. [Not accessible]
Yates, H. M. (2005) A Review of Evidence Based Practice in the Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders. Mechanicsburg, PA: Office of Planning, Research, Statistics and Grants, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. Access Here
Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A. and Schilling, F. (2010) ‘Stable dynamic risk factors in child sexual abusers: The incremental predictive power of narcissistic personality traits beyond
Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C. and Watt, K. A. (2003) The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured Professional Guidelines for Assessing Risk of Sexual Violence British Columbia, Canada Simon Fraser University: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University. [Not accessible]
F., Hanson, K. R. and Coache, M. È. (2010) ‘The Recidivism Rates of Female Sexual Offenders Are Low: A Meta Analysis.’ Sexual Abuse 22(4), 387 401. Access Here.
R. Russell, K., Forrest, L., Milton, E., Savoie, V., Baron, E., Kirkland, J. and Stobie, S. (2016) Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): A real world study of the reliability, validity and utility of a structured professional judgement instrument in the assessment and management of sexual offenders in South East Scotland. Edinburgh: NHS Lothian Sex Offender Liaison Service. Access Here.
Watt, K. A., Hart, S., Wilson, C., Guy, L. and Douglas, K. S. (2006) ‘An evaluation of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP) in high risk offenders: Inter rater reliability and concurrent validity.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychology Law Society, St Petersburg, Florida, USA. [Not accessible]
Hart, S. D., Michie, C. and Cooke, D. J. (2007) ‘Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence.’ British Journal of Psychiatry 190 (suppl. 49), s60 s65. Access Here
RATED page updated: August 2019 Risk Management Authority 2019
Hart, S. D. and Boer, D. P. (2010) ‘Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violent risk assessment.’ In R. K. Otto and K. S. Douglas. Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment. New York, London: Routledge, 269 294. Access Here
Sutherland, A. A. (2010). Sexual violence risk assessment: An investigation into the interrater reliability of the RSVP in Scotland. Doctoral thesis. Glasgow, UK: Section of Psychological Medicine, University of Glasgow. Access Here
©
Cortoni,SA07
Darjee,RSVP
Jackson, K. J. (2016) Validation of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol in Adult Sexual Offenders. Doctoral thesis. British Columbia, Canada Simon Fraser University. Access Here.
Sutherland, A.A., Johnstone, L., Davidson., K.M., Hart, S., Cooke, D.J., Kropp, P.R., Logan, C., Michie, C. and Stocks, R. (2012) ‘Sexual violence risk assessment: An investigation of the interrater reliability of professional judgements made using the risk of sexual violence protocol.’ International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 11(2), 119 133. Access Here.
Hanson, K. R., Helmus, L. M. and Harris, R., A. J. (2015) ‘Assessing the Risk and Needs of Supervised Sexual Offenders: A Prospective Study Using STABLE 2007, Static 99R, and Static 2002R.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 42(12), 1205 1224. Access Here
the Static 99/Stable 2007 priority categories on sexual reoffense.’ Sex Offender Treatment 5(1). Access Here.
© Risk Management Authority 2019
McNaughton Nicholls, C., Callanan, M., Legard, R., Tomaszewski, W., Purdon, S. and Webster, S.(2010) ‘Examining implementation of the Stable and Acute dynamic risk assessment tool pilot in England and Wales.’ Research Series 4/10. London: Ministry of Justice. Access Here
Tamatea, Amran J. (2014) ‘Predictive validity of the Stable 2007: A New Zealand Study.’ Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand 6(1), 57 72. Access Here
Sowden, J. N. and Olver, M. E. (2017) ‘Use of the violent risk scale sexual offender version and the Stable 2007 to assess dynamic sexual violence risk in a sample of treated sexual offenders.’ Psychological Assessment 29(3), 293 303. Access Here
RATED page updated: August 2019
Fernandez, Y., Harris, A. J. R., Hanson, R. K. and Sparks, J. (2012) STABLE 2007 coding manual revised 2012. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada. [Not accessible]
Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K. and Thornton, D. (2010) ‘Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 22(2), 191 217. Access Here.
Smid, W. J., Kamphuis, J. H., Weaver, E. C. and Van Beek, D. J. (2014) ‘A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.’ Psychological Assessment 26(3), 691 703. Access Here.
Eher, R., Olver, M. E., Heurix, I., Schilling, F. and Rettenberger, M. (2015) ‘Predicting reoffence in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment.’ Law and Human Behavior 39(6), 571 580. Access Here
An examination of the inter rater reliability of the STATIC 99 and STABLE 2007. Poster presentation at the 27th Annual Research and Treatment conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA, in October. [Not accessible]
Fabian, J. (2011) ‘Assessing the Sex Offender With Asperger’s Disorder: A Forensic Psychological and Neuropsychological Perspective.’ Sex Offender Law Report 12(5), 65 80. [Not Fernandez,accessible]Y.(2008)
Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T. and Helmus, L. (2007) Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project. Ontario, Canada: Public Safety Canada. Access Here.
Thornton, D. (2002) ‘Constructing and Testing a Framework for Dynamic Risk Assessment.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 14 (2), 139 153. Access Here
Eher, R, Mattes, A, Schilling, F, Haubner MacLean, T & Rettenberger, M (2011) ‘Dynamic Risk Assessment in Sexual Offenders Using STABLE 2000 and the STABLE 2007: An Investigation of predictive and Incremental Validity.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 20(10), 1 24. Access Here.
Rettenberger, M., M. E. Rice, G. T. Harris and R. Eher. (2017) ‘Actuarial risk assessment of sex offenders: the psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).’ Psychological Associaiton 29(6), 624 638. Access Here
Authority 2019
Rice, M. E. and G. T. Harris. (2016) ‘The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.’ In Phenix, A. and Hoberman, H. (eds.) Sexual Offending: Predisposing Antecedents, Assessments and Management. New York: Springer, 471 488. Access Here
Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Schilling, F. and Pfäfflin, F. (2008) ‘Failure of Static 99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study.’ Sexual Offender Treatment 3(1). Access Here
Walker, M. and O’ Rourke M. (2013) ‘Probation Officers’ Experience of Using Risk Matrix 2000 and Stable and Acute 2007 when supervising sex offenders living in the community.’ Irish Probation Journal 10, 162 176. Access Here
RATED page updated: August 2019 Management
Pham, T. H. and Ducro, C. (2008) ‘Évaluation du risque de récidive en Belgique francophone: Données préliminaires d'analyse factorielle de la “Sex Offender Recidivism Appraisal Guide” (SORAG) et de la Statique 99 [Risk assessment in social defence: Preliminary factorial analysis of the Sex Offender Recidivism Appraisal Guide (SORAG) and the Static 99].’ Annales Médico Psychologiques 166(7), 575 579. Access Here.
Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A., Boer, D. P. and Eher, R. (2010) ‘Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment: A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 169 186. Access Here.
Nunes, K. L., Firestone, P., Bradford, J. M., Greenberg, D. M. and Broom, I. (2002) ‘A comparison of modified versions of the Static 99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.’ Sexual Abuse: A journal of Research and Treatment 14(2), 253 269. Access Here.
© Risk
SORAG
Looman, J. (2006) ‘Comparison of Two Risk Assessment Instruments for Sexual Offenders.’ Sexual Abuse 18(2), 193 206. Access Here
Ducrol, C. and Pham, T. (2006) ‘Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static 99 on Belgian Sex Offenders Committed to a Forensic Facility.’ Sexual Abuse 18(1), 15 26. Access Here.
Parent, G., Guay, J. P. and Knight, R. A. (2011) ‘An assessment of long term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: one size doesn’t fit all.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 38(2), 188 209. Access Here
Langton, C. M., Hogue, T. E., Daffern, M., Mannion, A. and Howells, K. (2009) ‘Prediction of institutional aggression among personality disordered forensic patients using actuarial and structured clinical risk assessment tools: prospective evaluation of the HCR 20, VRS, Static 99, and Risk Matrix 2000.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 15(7), 635 659. Access Here
Rettenberger, M. and Eher, R. (2007) ‘Predicting reoffence in sexual offender subtypes: A prospective validation study of the German version of the Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).’ Sexual Offender Treatment, 2(2), 1 12. Access Here
Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K. and Helmus, L. (2012) ‘Communicating risk for sex offenders: risk ratios for Static 2002R.’ Sexual Offender Treatment 7(2), 1 12. Access Here.
Brouillette Alarie, S., Proulx, J. and Hanson, R. K. (2017)’Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: understanding the latent constructs of the Static 99R and Static 2002R.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 30(6), 676 704. Access Here
Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M., Helmus, L. M., Thornton, D. and Phenix, A. (2017) ‘Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static 99R and Static 2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools.’ Psychological Assessment 29(5), 582 597. Access Here
Yates, H. M. (2005) A Review of Evidence Based Practice in the Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders. Mechanicsburg, PA: Office of Planning, Research, Statistics and Grants, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. Access Here.
Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J., Letourneau, E., Helmus, L. M. and Thornton, D. (2018) ‘Reductions in risk based on time offense free in the community: Once a sexual offender, not always a sexual offender.’ Psychology, Public Policy and Law 24(1), 48 63. Access Here.
Walters, G. D., Knight, R. A. and Thornton, D. (2009) ‘The latent structure of sexual violence risk: A taxometric analysis of widely used sex offender actuarial risk measures.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 36(3), 290 306. Access Here
M., Hanson, R. K. and Helmus, L. (2011) The RRASOR, Static 99R, and Static 2002R All Add Incrementally to the Prediction of Recidivism among Sex Offenders. Corrections research user report no. 2011 02. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada. Access Here.
Hanson, K. R., Harris, R., A. J., Helmus, L. and Thornton, D. (2014) ‘High Risk Sex Offenders May Not Be High Risk Forever.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29(15), 2792 2813. Access Here
Rossegger, A.; Gerth, J.; Singh, J. P. and Endrass, J. (2013) ‘Examining the predictive validity of the SORAG in Switzerland.’ Sex Offender Treatment 8(2), 1 12. Access Here.
Quinsey, L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E. and Cormier, C. A. (2006) Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing the Risk. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association. [Not accessible]
Helmus, L. (2009) Re norming Static 99 recidivism estimates: Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Ontario, Canada: Carleton University. Access Helmus,HereL.,Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static 99 and Static 2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 24(1), 64 101. Access Here.
RATED page updated: August 2019
Static Babchishin,2002RK.
© Risk Management Authority 2019
Jung, S., Ennis, L., Hermann, C. A., Pham, A. T., Choy, A. L., Corabian, G. and Hock, T. (2017) ‘An evaluation of the reliability, construct validity and actor structure of the Static 2002R.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 61(4), 464 487. Access Here
Parent, G., Guay, J. P. and Knight, R. A. (2011) ‘An assessment of long term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: one size doesn’t fit all.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 38(2), 188 209. Access Phenix,Here.A.,Doren,
Lee, S. C. (2019) Cross Cultural Validity of Actuarial Risk Assessment Instruments for Individuals in North America with a History of Sexual Offending: Static 99R and Static 2002R. Doctoral thesis. Carleton University: Ottawa, Ontario. Access Here
D., Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K. and Thornton, D. (2009) Coding rules for Static 2002. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada. Access Here.
Risk
Rohrer, D. M. (2019) Replication of a Three Factor Solution: Exploring the Underlying Constructs of the Static 99R and Static 2002R. Master of Arts thesis. Brandeis University: Waltham, Massachusetts. Access Here.
Dietiker, J., Dittmann, V. and Graf, M. (2007) ‘Risk assessment of sex offenders in a German speaking sample. applicability of PCL SV, HCR 20+3, and SVR 20.’ Nervenarzt 78(1), 53 61. Access Here
Hill, A., Habermann, N., Klusmann, D., Berner, W. and Briken, P. (2008) ‘Criminal Recidivism in Sexual Homicide Perpetrators.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 52(1), 5 20. Access Here
Reeves, S. G., Ogloff, J. R. P. and Simmons, M. (2017) ‘The predictive validity of the Static 99, Static 99R and Static 2002/r: which one to use?’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 30(8), 887 907. Access Here
Kanters, T., Hornsveld, R. H. J., Nunes, K. L., Zwets, A. J., Muris, P. and Van Marie, H. J. C. (2017) ‘The Sexual Violence Risk 20: factor structure and psychometric properties.’ The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 28(3), 368 387. Access Here
© Management Authority 2019
Craig, L. A., Beech, A. and Browne, K. D. (2006b). ‘Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Sex Offender Risk Assessment Measures on UK Samples: A Cross Validation of the Risk Matrix 2000 Scales.’ Sexual Offender Treatment 1(1). Access Here
J., Beech, A. R., Wilcox, D. T. and Boer, D. P. (2011) ‘The assessment of dynamic risk and recidivism in a sample of special needs sexual offenders.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 17(1), 75 92. Access Here
Craig, L. A., Beech, A. and Browne, K. D. (2006a) ‘Cross validation of the Risk Matrix 2000 Sexual and Violent scales.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(5), 612 633. Access Here.
Hart, S. D. and Boer, D. P. (2010) ‘Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violent risk assessment.’ In R. K. Otto and K. S. Douglas. Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment. New York, London: Routledge, 269 294. Access Here.
SVR Blacker,20
De Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D. and Mead, G. (2004) ‘Predictive validity of the SVR 20 and Static 99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders.’ Law and Human Behavior 28(3), 235 251. Access Here.
RATED page updated: August 2019
RATED page updated: August 2019
Beggs, S. M. and Grace, R. C. (2010) ‘Assessment of Dynamic Risk Factors: An Independent Validation Study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version.’ Sexual Abuse 22(2), 234 251. Access Here
Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A., Boer, D. P. and Eher, R. (2010) ‘Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment: A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 169 186. Access Here.
Knight, R. A. and Thornton, D. (2007) Evaluating and Improving Risk Assessment Schemes for Sexual Recidivism: A Long Term Follow Up of Convicted Sexual Offenders. Washington, D. C.: United States Department of Justice. Access Here
Olver, M. E. (2004) ‘The development and validation of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version (VRS:SO) and its relationship to psychopathy and treatment attrition.’ Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 64(9 B), 4628. Access Here
Maltais, N. and Sribney, C. (2018) Assessing the Convergent Validity of the VRS:SO and the CPORT with a Community Sample. Poster presentation at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, B.C., 17 19 October. Access Here.
Rettenberger, M., Boer, D. P. and Eher, R. (2011) ‘The Predictive Accuracy of Risk Factors in the Sexual Violence Risk 20 (Svr 20).’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 38(10), 1009 1027. Access
G. and Långström, N. (2002) ‘Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A Comparison of four different measures.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 8(1), 25 40. Access
T., Di Placido, C. and Wong, S. (2001) How dangerous are dangerous sex offenders? An estimation of recidivism and level of risk using a matched control group. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre. [Not accessible]
Parent, G., Guay, J. P. and Knight, R. A. (2011) ‘An assessment of long term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: one size doesn’t fit all.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 38(2), 188 209. Access Here.
Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T. and Gordon, A. (2007) ‘The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.’ Psychological Assessment 19(3), 318 329. Access Here.
VRS:SO
Olver, M. E., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., Grace, R. C., and Wong, S. C. P. (2014) ‘Incorporating Change Information Into Sexual Offender Risk Assessments Using the Violence Risk Scale Sexual Offender Version.’ Sexual Abuse 26(5), 472 499. Access Here
© Risk Management Authority 2019
Sjöstedt,Here
Ramírez, M. P., Illescas, S. R., García, M. M., Forero, C. G. and Pueyo, A. A. (2008) ‘Predicción de riesgo de reincidencia en agresores sexuales [Recidivism risk assessment in sex offenders].’ Psicothema 20(2), 205 210. Access Here
Witte,Here.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C. and Norcross, J. C. (1992) ‘In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors.’ American Psychologist 47(9), 1102 1114. Access
RATED page updated: August 2019 © Risk Management Authority 2019
Sowden, J. N. and Olver, M. E. (2017) ‘Use of the violent risk scale sexual offender version and the Stable 2007 to assess dynamic sexual violence risk in a sample of treated sexual offenders.’ Psychological Assessment 29(3), 293 303. Access Here.
Olver, M. E., Neumann, C. S., Kingston, D. A., Nicholaichuk, T. P. and Wong, S. C. P. (2018b) ‘Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale Sexual Offender Version instrument in a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders.’ Assessment 25(1), 40 55. Access Here
Jung, S. and Wielinga, F. (2019) ‘Simplifying the estimation of violence risk by police among individuals charged for sexual assault.’ Journal of Threat Assessment and Management 6(1), 38 50. Access Here.
J. N. (2013) Examining the Relationship of Risk, Treating Readiness and Therapeutic Change to Recidivism in a Sample of Treated Sex Offenders. Doctoral thesis. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan. Access Here
TOOLS AWAITING VALIDATION BARR Babchishin,2002RK.
Jung, S., Wielinga, F. and Ennis, L. (2018) ‘Can we keep it simple? Using the Barr 2002R with a community based sex offender sample.’ Journal of Sexual Aggression 24(1), 25 36. Access Here
Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K. and Blais, J. (2016) ‘Less is more: using Static 2002R subscales to predict violent and general recidivism among sexual offenders.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 28(3), 187 217. Access Here.
Sowden,Here.
Olver, M. E., Mundt, J. C., Thornton, D., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., Kingston, D. A., Sowden, J. N., Nicholaichuck, T. P., Goprdon, A., and Wong, S. C. P. (2018a) ‘Using the Violence Risk Scale Sexual Offence Version in Sexual Violence Risk Assessments: updated risk categories and recidivism estimates from a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders.’ Psychological Assessment 30(7), 941 955. Access Here.
Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., Kingston, D. A. and Wong, S. C. P. (2014) ‘A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change.’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 82(2), 312 324. Access Here
Olver, M. E., Neumann, C. S., Kingston, D. A., Nicholaichuk, T. P. and Wong, S. C. P. (2016) ‘Construct validity of the violence risk scale sexual offender version instrument in a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders.’ Assessment 25(1), 40 55. Access Here.
W., Maaike Helmus, L. and Seto, M. C. (2018) ‘A Validation Study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT).’ Sexual Abuse Access Here
Eke,CPORTA.
M., Hanson, R. K. and Blais, J. (2013) User Guide for the Brief Assessment for Recidivism Risk 2002R (BARR 2002R). Based on a paper presented by K. Babchishin at the 32nd Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, October 30th, Chicago, Illinois. Access Here
N. and Sribney, C. (2018) Assessing the Convergent Validity of the VRS:SO and the CPORT with a Community Sample. Poster presentation at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, B.C., 17 19 October. Access Here
Long, M., Alison, L., Tejeiro, R., Hendricks, E. and Giles, S. (2016) ‘KIRAT: Law Enforcement’s Prioritization Tool for Investigating Indecent Image Offenders.’ Psychology, Public Policy and Law 22(1), 12 21. Access Here
Pilan, A. J. M. (2016) The predictive validity of general and offence specific risk assessment tools for child pornography offenders’ reoffending. Degree of Master of Art thesis. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan. Access Here.
Eke, A. W. and Seto, M. C. (2016) Scoring guide for the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT). Access Here
Seto, M. C. and Eke, A. W. (2015) ‘Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: development of the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT).’ Law and Human Behavior 39(4), 416 429. Access Here
Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre. (2012). A picture of abuse: a thematic assessment of the risk of contact child sexual abuse posed by those who possess indecent images of children. London: CEOP. Access Here
McManus, M.A., Long, M. L. and Alison, L. (2011) ‘Child pornography offenders: towards an evidenced based approach to prioritizing the investigation of indecent image offences.’ In Alison, L. and Rainbow, L. Professionalizing Offender Profiling: Forensic and Investigative Psychology in Practice. London: Routledge, 178 188. Access Here
KIRAT 2
© Risk Management Authority 2019
Seto, M. C. and Eke, A. W. (2017).’Correlates of Admitted Sexual Interest in Children Among Individuals Convicted of Child Pornography Offenses.’ Law and Human Behavior 41(3), 305 313. Access Here
Beech,SARN
A. R., Fisher, D. D. and Thornton, D. (2003) ‘Risk assessment of sex offenders.’ Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34(4), 339 352. Access Here.
Gunnarsdóttir, H. Ó. (2019) Risk Assessment of convicted Child Pornography Offenders in Iceland 2000 2017. Master of Clinical Psychology Thesis. Iceland: Skemann University. Access Maltais,Here.
RATED page updated: August 2019
Hocken, K., Winder, B. and Grayson, A. (2013) ‘Putting responsivity into risk assessment: the use of the Structured Assessment of Risk and Need (SARN) with sexual offenders who have an intellectual disability.’ Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending 4(3/4), 77 89. Access Here
Long, M. L., Alison, L. A. and McManus, M. A. (2013) ‘Child Pornography and Likelihood of Contact Abuse: A Comparison Between Contact Child Sexual Offenders and Noncontact Offenders.’ Sexual Abuse 25(4), 370 395. Access Here.
Miner, M. H., Robinson, B. E., Newstrom N. and Strobel Ayres, C. (2018) Evaluation of the Implementation of the Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS). National Institute of Justice: Washington, D. C. Access Here
VASOR 2
McGrath, R. J., Lasher, M. P., Cumming, G. F., Langton, C. M. and Hoke, S. E. (2014) ‘Development of Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk 2 (VASOR 2) Reoffense Risk Scale.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment 26(3), 271 290. Access Here
McGrath, R. J., Hoke, S. E. and Lasher, M. P. (2013) VASOR 2: Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk 2 Manual. Middlebury, VT. Access Here.
Lasher, M. P. and McGrath, R. J. (2017) ‘Desistance from sexual and other violent offending among child sexual abusers: observations using the Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS).’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 44, 416 431. Access Here.
M., McGrath, R. J., Wilson, D., and Cumming, G. F. (2015) ‘Collaborative Treatment Planning Using the Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS): Concordance of Therapist Evaluation and Client Self Evaluation.’ Internal Journal of Forensic Mental Health 14(1), 1 9. Access Here
RATED page updated: August 2019 © Risk Management Authority 2019
Thornton, D. (2002) ‘Constructing and Testing a Framework for Dynamic Risk Assessment.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 14 (2), 139 153. Access Here
Webster, S. D., Mann, R. E., Carter, A. J., Long, J., Milner, R. J. O’Brien, M. D., Wakeling, H. C. and Ray, N. L. (2006) ‘Inter rater reliability of dynamic risk assessment with sexual offenders.’ Psychology, Crime and Law 12(4), 439 452. Access Here
McGrath, R. J., Lasher, M. P. and Cumming, G. F. (2012) ‘The Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS): Psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with Static 99R.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 24(5), 431 458. Access McGrath,Here.R.J.,
Tully, R. J., Browne, K. D. and Craig, L. A. (2015) ‘An examination of the predictive validity of the structured assessment of the risk and needs treatment needs analysis (SARN TNA) in England and Wales.’ Criminal Justice & Behavior 42(5), 509 528. Access Here.
Smid, W. J., Kamphuis, J. H., Weaver, E. C. and Van Beek, D. J. (2014) ‘A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.’ Psychological Assessment 26(3), 691 703. Access Here
Lasher,SOTIPS
Cumming, G. F. and Lasher, M. P. (2013) SOTIPS (Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale) Manual. Middlebury: VT. Access Here.