Skip to main content

CA26

Page 1

Winter 1993/4

Madingley Hall

A QUESTION OF PATRONAGE Historically the University and Colleges have sought out thebest architects in the country: Wren, Gibbs, Wilkins, Waterhouse, and nowa-

days Foster, Hopkins and Cullinan. This is

understandable where thebrief requires genius and exceptional skill. This has made Cambridgea treasury of fine buildings and a

constant source of inspiration and instruction for those architects who come here to learn

and practice.

In the fifties and sixties these local architects were a6Ie to show that their output was ofa comparatively high order and were patronised accordingly. David Roberts, Leslie Martin, Sandy Wilson and Christophe Grillet built

major new buildings.

Criticism by Catherine Cooke

Why is it now that these opportunities go elsewhere? Why doesa leading construction cosr expert state that Cambridge practices are

too small? Why doesa leading academic archi-. tect suggest that theTé are ”no Cambridge prac-

tices good enough fortheCollege.ha advi.s.est “Wh y does

26

College holda competition for

local architects then turn its back on what is produced? Is the local practitioner ro sit back and allow an inferiority complex tobe inflirted? Must we wait foranother History Library fiasco to make theresearch and academic community realise that there is unrecognised and underemployed reliable architectural skill available locally? Is it really better to employ London whizz-kids for every bitofcollege addition and infill? Does not, at least, our familiarity with the traditions and the true characteristics of the place recommend usmore? Can we expect thata larger slice of the action, impliedbY theextraordinary current burst of fundraising, may come inour direction? We must be grateful that various local firms by gradual achievement have had their increasing excellence and competence acknowledged, but lets let it be known that generally we feel we should be given more of an opportunity.

A review ofcurrent Architectural and Environmental Issues and

DY

Now that it‘s finishedI suppose this library will start

getting prizes, as Cullinan buildings do.

I am struck by the appositeness of jury comments on hisFountains Abbey Visitors’ Centre, lately shortlist-

ed for Building of the Year as one ofthe National

RIBA Win ners. ’This isa building of which one could

never tire and where there could always be something new and delightful to discover.‘ The St Johns‘ building fails for precisely this reason. Instead of

fosussing attention on the real object for which the people are here assembled, it drowns and distracts them inits own over-detailed ’delights’. These buildings are not thresholds to experiencing the real

objective of ruined abbey orthe line-by-line contents of fascinating books’. They simply adda burden to the process of perception or of pushing the tired young brain that extra mile. And when every detail is so busy being ‘constructive*, all sense of construc

tion in the whole is overwhelmed. As an organisation of space and the exploitation ofa tight site the building is unarguably successful. It containsa diversity of spaces - public and private, individual and group, embracing and expansive and varied views outward, which will sustain the moods and needs of underg raduates. One can see

it‘s alreadya home-from-home tothem: comfy, full of mutually annihilating nick-nacks, feeling likea

conversion from something else. To my taste the best space isthe double heig ht

entrance hall. Beneath all its detailing, the gallery

and g reat round informal table for sorting xeroxeso r

waiting for friends make it genuinely redolent of some medieval great hall. From there one can rise on a lift or stairs to three close-packed floors of shelving and seating above.

The basic footprint is simple:a crossbar inthe range

events in the Cambridge area produced by theCambridge Association of Architects. The

This issue of Cambridge Architecture is largely’ devoted tosome current work inand

oftheindividual contributors and not of theAssociation.

completed, by both local and London architects and allied professionals.

views inthis newsletter are those

THE NEW LIBRARY FOR ST JOHN'S COLLEGE

around thecity under construction, or recently

ofold building betweena large, hard, public courtyard and the Master's verdant riverside garden. The shorter protrusion into the sunken public court cre-

ates an entrance witha mix of reading spaces above.

To the right the new

merges imperceptibly into the

old. To the left the old range will reconnect toa


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
CA26 by Cambridge Association of Architects - Issuu