Skip to main content

CA18

Page 1

Number 18

October 1991

GAMBRIDGEARGHITEGTURE

A review of current Architectural and Environmental Issues and events in the Cambridge area produced by theCambridge Association of Architects. The views in this newsletter are those of the individual contributors and not of the Association. Newsletter co-edited by David Raven and Colen Lumley. ’Cambridge Architecture Trumpington Mews, Trumpington, Cambridge. CB2 2LS

MISSED OPPORTUNITY Carl Rowland The City Council is producing its Local Plan for adoption next year and the draft has recently been published. Within this document isa section outlining its policies on the River Cam within the City's boundaries. This issue of Cambridge Architecture is dedicated to the B'ver Cam. arlier study by the City Council The River L'am, Environment and Conservation, published in 1973, described the many characteristics of the River from Bryon's Pool to Fen Ditton, by way of the water meadows of Granchester and Coe Fen, bringing the ‘rural scene’ to the doorstep of the more formal setting of the colleges at Silver Street bridge, then out again to the starkness of Stourbridge Common viaJesus Green and Midsummer Common. The relationship and form ofthe landscape adjoining the River is analysed ina complete way and one is made aware of the connections between theRiver and thespaces through which it flows. The draft Local Plan does not seem tobuild upon this earlier work and its policies do not address many oftheimportant issues it raises. For example, the 1973 report notes that the recreational uses on Jesus Green arenota response to their River setting and, perhaps, this is • missed opportunity. .raft Local Plan attempts to rationalise the Cams uses and limit their extent. Of course there isa sensible level above which chaos would ensue, but the Cam has historically been a busy stretch of River with large barges of coal and other goods once delivered to the King's Mill at Silver Street, the Colleges and Quayside. The provision of further short and long stay moorings, perhaps in the form ofa marina, would allow river craft - some colourful, some tatty - to be viewed inbetter circumstances than at present. The potential problem of encouraging more river traffic to Cambridge could be controlled by other methods. Perhaps by not allowing barges and cruisers through Bates Lock unlessa temporary mooring has been booked ora permanent one secured. The Council, in seeking with its polices to better the River environment, should not destroy its character of peaceful meadows, rhythmic blades, moored craft and “chaotic and noisy” punts. The Local Plan recognises the river's popularity for different leisure uses and seeks to identify the particular problems that rowing, fishing, cruising, walking, swimming, punting, etc bring.

The Nancy and other boats unloading at Quayside, Cambridge about 1900 (Cambridge and Country Folk Museum)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
CA18 by Cambridge Association of Architects - Issuu