8 minute read

Letters

Next Article
News

News

Sell out

Welcome to this week’s Reno News & Review.

Advertisement

I’ve had people ask me about my estate sale since I wrote about my decision to have one (“I can’t believe it’s not clutter,” feature story, Jan. 14). Well, after a couple of delays, we finally had the sale last weekend, and it was a terrible experience.

Don’t get me wrong. Debbie Cox, the professional estate sale organizer we hired, did a great job. And my girlfriend, Margot, and I did well enough on the two goals of the sale: getting rid of stuff and making some money. The mistake we made was that we volunteered to help during the sale. Cox usually discourages owners and family members to visit the property during an estate sale, and now I really understand why.

If Cox had just come to me after the sale and said, “We made this amount and got rid of all of these things,” I think I would’ve been happy, but being there during the sale was very stressful. It was disheartening to see strangers rummaging through my house, haggling down items I thought were already priced too low. Every time I heard the individual sale price of any given item, I was disappointed, though happy with the overall take.

Plus, some of these strangers were indeed strange. There was a variety of oddity, but, for me, the most obnoxious people were the wild-eyed oldtimers who would ask, “Got any rifles?” “Nope.” “What about handguns?” “No, sir.” “Bullets?” “No.” “OK, what about hunting knives?” Those interactions got me wondering how often guns are sold at garage sales and estate sales. It also occurred to me that there are two kinds of people in the world: those who fantasize about who they want to fuck, and those who fantasize about who they want to kill. And I have a hard time relating to the latter.

Anyway, if other people are considering doing something similar, I’d say go for it. And I’d reiterate that we had a good experience working with Cox. (Her website is www.chaosreno. com.) But I’d also suggest that you just trust her when she tells you that you don’t want to be there during the estate sale. —Brad Bynum bradb@newsreview.com

Sushi rules

Re: “What’s Reno’s Food?” (Feature story, Feb. 25):

It seems a bit unfair to label all AYCE sushi patrons as disgruntled, post-casino-buffet gluttons. After all, sushi, especially with a reasonable fish-to-rice ratio, is not exactly filling. The chances of achieving the same desired fullness at regular establishments before emptying the wallet or purse is a remote possibility at best. By the way, my favorite local AYCE, which shall remain nameless, is all about warm, friendly service, off-menu specials, and dazzling homemade creations that you won’t find anywhere else. (Yes, that’s you, Godzilla and Aureliano!) Oops!

Rob Shader Reno

Key to the letters page

It seems like more and more law enforcement agencies are lining up to have phones unlocked. It all started with one request from the FBI for one phone to be unlocked, and when will it end? A New York judge denied New York police from getting Apple to unlock the phone of a suspected drug dealer. If the government wins, and Apple has to unlock the phone, ground rules should be setup before the first phone is unlocked. 1. The phone must be unlocked at an Apple lab. The key must not be allowed to leave the premises, and no one except Apple employees are allowed to touch the equipment. This way the key will not end up in the hands of hackers, and if it does, no one else can be blamed except Apple. 2. A court order must accompany the phone detailing what information the law enforcement agency is trying to obtain. Any other information found on the phone can’t be used against the phone owner—Fifth Amendment against self incrimination, privacy rights. 3. An attorney representing the phone owner must be present to ensure the letter and spirit of the court order has been complied with and no one has a copy of information not allowed by the court order. 4. No fishing. Proof of ownership must be established.

More should be done to ensure the privacy rights of citizens than to give the government open access to your computer (and your phone is a computer) and any other private information just because some agent suspects your computer may or may not have something of interest. Dewey Quong Reno

Trainor wheels

Re “The market and solar” (Let Freedom Ring, Feb. 25):

Brendan Trainor’s article rails on solar subsidies yet completely ignores the fact that fossil fuels are heavily subsidized by our government, and that doesn’t include the hidden costs of environmental damage which have been legislated out of these industries. Journalistic integrity would tell a different story than portrayed in this article.

Marcial Reiley Reno

Re “The market and solar” (Let Freedom Ring, Feb. 25):

I’m replying to Brendan Trainor’s “The Market and Solar” to clear up the Libertarian Party of Nevada’s position. We agree that “libertarians should support a mandate and subsidy-free energy market, and should advocate the end of the progressive model of regulated monopolies like NV Energy, so consumers have real choices in who provides their energy needs.” Unfortunately, the PUC’s actions have further entrenched NV Energy’s monopoly on power generation and distribution by setting an artificially low “wholesale price,” along with a hefty monthly access fee. Assuming the PUC’s decision stands, NV Energy will effectively purchase surplus residentially-generated power for very close to free. Though net metering at retail rates does not reflect the cost to distribute power from residential sources to other customers, that framework comes closer to ending NV Energy’s monopoly by providing consumers a real choice in who provides their energy. We would prefer complete deregulation of Nevada’s power; until that happens, we must ensure the cronies that leverage regulatory capture to profit off of Nevadans don’t make a bad situation worse. To that end, we support all efforts that accommodate the decentralization and deregulation of power generation. David Colborne Libertarian Party of Nevada Reno

Cauci dissed

The historical purpose of a caucus is to gather folks together to discuss, argue, campaign for a particular candidate. Then, based on what folks hear and learn, folks can then make a more-informed vote.

That does not seem to be the case for the modern caucus. I attended the Democratic caucus in Virginia City and was hoping to actively participate in some kind of discussion, but it never happened. Instead, we listened to someone read letters from elected officials that were just pep talks encouraging us to vote for a Democrat. (Preaching to the choir?) The reason for a caucus cannot be for the people since caucusing creates time hardships that keep people from attending, and state law does not obligate employers to facilitate attending a caucus, which inhibits participation.

The only given reason is “First in the West” status (with a caucus, the party decides the date). But what does this buy us? Well, the candidates tend to show up in our state, but they all just repeated the same talking points from previous stump speeches with a few token panderings added for selected local issues. Is that worth disenfranchising so many voters? I think not. The Democratic party claims to be against voter suppression, yet it’s the Democratic party that insists on a caucus system. You can’t have it both ways.

Michel Rottman Virginia Highlands

Erik Holland

Our Mission: To publish great newspapers that are successful and enduring. To create a quality work environment that encourages employees to grow professionally while respecting personal welfare. To have a positive impact on our communities and make them better places to live. Editor-at-Large/Publisher D. Brian Burghart Associate Editor Brad Bynum News Editor Dennis Myers Special Projects Editor Jeri Chadwell-Singley Calendar Editor Kelley Lang Contributors Amy Alkon, Kelsey Fitzgerald, Bob Grimm, Ashley Hennefer, Shelia Leslie, Eric Marks, Jessica Santina, Todd South, Brendan Trainor, Kris Vagner, Bruce Van Dyke, Allison Young Design Manager Lindsay Trop Art Director Brian Breneman Marketing/Publications Manager Serene Lusano Marketing/Publications Designer Sarah Hansel Production Coordinator Skyler Smith Designer Kyle Shine Distribution Manager/Operations Coordinator Kelly Miller Senior Advertising Consultants Gina Odegard, Bev Savage Advertising Consultant Emily Litt Distribution Director Greg Erwin Distribution Drivers Tracy Breeden, Alex Barskyy, Denise Cairns, Steve Finlayson, Debbie Frenzi, Vicki Jewell, Marty Troye, Warren Tucker, Gary White, Joseph White, Margaret Underwood

President/CEO Jeff VonKaenel Director of Nuts & Bolts Deborah Redmond Human Resources Manager Melanie Topp Marketing/Promotions/Facilities Manager Will Niespodzinski Executive Coordinator Jessica Takehara Business Manager Nicole Jackson Payroll/AP Wizard Miranda Dargitz Accounts Receivable Specialist Kortnee Angel Sweetdeals Coordinator Courtney DeShields Nuts & Bolts Ninja Christina Wukmir Senior Support Tech Joe Kakacek Developer John Bisignano System Support Specialist Kalin Jenkins

N&R Publications Editor Michelle Carl N&R Publications Manging Editor Shannon Springmeyer N&R Publications Writers Kate Gonzales, Anne Stokes N&R Publications Consultant Catherine Greenspan 405 Marsh Ave.,Third Floor, Reno, NV 89509 Phone (775) 324-4440 Fax (775) 324-2515 Website www.newsreview.com Got a News Tip? Fax (775) 324-2515 Calendar Events www.newsreview.com/calendar Want to Advertise? Fax (775) 324-2515 or rnradinfo@newsreview.com Classified Fax (916) 498-7910 or classifieds@newsreview.com Job Opportunities jobs@newsreview.com Want to Subscribe to RN&R? renosubs@newsreview.com

Editorial Policies: Opinions expressed in RN&R are those of the authors and not of Chico Community Publishing, Inc. Contact the editor for permissions to reprint articles, cartoons, or other portions of the paper. RN&R is not responsible for unsolicited manuscripts or review materials. Email letters to rnrletters@newsreview.com. All letters received become the property of the publisher. We reserve the right to print letters in condensed form and to edit them for libel.

Advertising Policies: All advertising is subject to the newspaper’s Standards of Acceptance. The advertiser and not the newspaper assumes the responsibility for the truthful content of their advertising message.

RN&R is printed at Sierra Nevada Media on recycled newsprint. Circulation of RN&R is verified by the Circulation Verification Council. RN&R is a member of CNPA, AAN and AWN.

This article is from: